[Bug 49635] Re: adept is _really_ slow.

2008-11-03 Thread Dave W
Same problem here.  Each box I check in the Adept Installer takes about 13 
seconds before I am able to check another box.
Kubuntu 8.04 Hardy Heron

-- 
adept is _really_ slow. 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49635
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 49635] Re: adept is _really_ slow.

2008-08-03 Thread Jonathan Thomas
Adept alpha 5 is _really_ way faster. ;-)
/me rejoices.

** Changed in: adept (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

-- 
adept is _really_ slow. 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49635
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 49635] Re: adept is _really_ slow.

2008-01-25 Thread jasonq
Kubuntu 7.10 (Gutsy) with all updates as of 25-Jan-2008 (on Intel Core 2
Duo with 3GB RAM).  Still get slow behavior (about 8 seconds per checked
program).

-- 
adept is _really_ slow. 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49635
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 49635] Re: adept is _really_ slow.

2008-01-09 Thread pipatron
Freshly installed kubuntu on a 1.2GHz Pentium M with 1.25GB RAM
(Thinkpad X40): From clicking on the game 'KQ' until it's actually
marked: about 18 seconds, during which adept does not respond at all.

Doesn't matter what package I chose, this was just an example.

-- 
adept is _really_ slow. 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49635
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 49635] Re: adept is _really_ slow.

2007-11-06 Thread Marc Carson
Confirmed - Adept is unusably slow and feels like it will crash at any
moment. Selecting single software packages takes longer than it should.
Kubuntu 7.10 - Dell Inspiron E1505 Dual Core T7200/2G RAM

-- 
adept is _really_ slow. 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49635
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 49635] Re: adept is _really_ slow.

2007-11-06 Thread Michael D. Stemle, Jr.
Could everybody who is reporting this *PLEASE* quantify their report in
some way (preferably in seconds or in the number of beers they consumed
while waiting)?

Slow is such a relative term that I think we need to get away from it.
I see someone talking about 5-10 seconds per selection, and I haven't
really experienced that... we'll have to troubleshoot that a little
more.

-- 
adept is _really_ slow. 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49635
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 49635] Re: adept is _really_ slow.

2007-11-06 Thread Jon Anderson
Actually, performance is much better for me in Gutsy. I'd call it usable
now!

When I click on a category (e.g. Settings), it takes ~3s to switch view.

Selecting a program (e.g. GBINDADMIN) takes ~2s.

It used to be more like 5-10s when I clicked on a program.

-- 
adept is _really_ slow. 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49635
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 49635] Re: adept is _really_ slow.

2007-11-06 Thread asbenicio
Ok.

In my experience, for each packet added I wait between 1 and 5 minutes
(minutes, I said). The variation is due a dependencies checking, I think..
In multiple selection, depending of how much itens I select, the wait extend
for many HOURS I abort the process after circa 2 hours. For experience I
select many, many itens (dozens of it). The system almost freeze.

Aristóteles

2007/11/6, Michael D. Stemle, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Could everybody who is reporting this *PLEASE* quantify their report in
 some way (preferably in seconds or in the number of beers they consumed
 while waiting)?

 Slow is such a relative term that I think we need to get away from it.
 I see someone talking about 5-10 seconds per selection, and I haven't
 really experienced that... we'll have to troubleshoot that a little
 more.

 --
 adept is _really_ slow.
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49635
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.


-- 
adept is _really_ slow. 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49635
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 49635] Re: adept is _really_ slow.

2007-09-01 Thread asbenicio
I'm using a pretty core2duo/1,25 GB ram. My preference is kde instead
gnome, but Synaptic is very funcional, while adept is very, very, very
bad. Someone known any other add/remove apps that I can use with kde??

-- 
adept is _really_ slow. 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49635
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 49635] Re: adept is _really_ slow.

2007-08-19 Thread Fernán González
Waiting for adept to check which apps you have installed and wait for it
to load all the lists is also extremely long. Sometimes I think
something must be going wrong in the system when I open Add/Remove
Apps.

-- 
adept is _really_ slow. 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49635
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 49635] Re: adept is _really_ slow.

2007-05-15 Thread Ace Suares
Above use case is not too exaggerated.

On top of the described actual behavior, it happens sometimes that a
certain click activates some other programs. Sometimes, when hasty, you
click on another program, however, it is still processing the first,
which means now you have *disabled* that program. With it, some other
programs are disabled, and suddenly you find yourself in a terrible lag-
and-clickfest.

Please accept this as a bug that renders Adept near useless.

I run a P4 3.0 Ghz with 2 GB RAM.

-- 
adept is _really_ slow. 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49635
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Team, which is a bug contact for adept in ubuntu.

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 49635] Re: adept is _really_ slow.

2007-05-08 Thread Jon Anderson
I don't know if this is exactly what the original poster was talking
about, but I find Adept Installer (Add / Remove Programs) to be
*really* slow. I've always just apt-get install'ed things, but I'm
trying the GUI out now that I've got newbies on Kubuntu.

The problem is that, every time I check a box, the GUI freezes until
*all* dependancies, etc. are checked. This really gets in the way of
usability and makes me want to just drop to a shell (which I can't
recommend to newbies).

Since Qt has such a great signal-slot mechanism, why can't ticking a box
just fire off a signal to a worker thread, which updates the list of
packages to install in the *background*? As it is, it's really quite
irritating.

I don't have much time, but I have some Qt experience, and I'd be
willing to look at this issue if the patches are likely to get
considered.

** Changed in: adept (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: ept = adept
   Status: Needs Info = Confirmed

-- 
adept is _really_ slow. 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49635
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Team, which is a bug contact for adept in ubuntu.

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 49635] Re: adept is _really_ slow.

2007-05-08 Thread Jon Anderson
A use case:

Bob, having just installed Kubuntu from CD, wants to see what games are
available for Linux. He runs Add / Remove Programs and sees a list of
hundreds of games.

Desired Behaviour:
Bob selects a bunch of them (say, twenty or so), clicks Inspect Changes and 
then installs them. He has lots of fun and recommends Linux to everybody he 
meets. World peace ensues.

Actual Behaviour:
Bob selects a bunch of them (say, twenty or so), but because he has to wait 
5-10 seconds between *every* *single* *mouse* *click*, he gives up and tells 
everybody he knows Linux is really slow. People who were on the verge of 
trying Ubuntu for themselves decide not to in the face of such a negative 
review.

Okay, so that might be a little exaggerated, but this is a real
usability issue.

-- 
adept is _really_ slow. 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49635
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 49635] Re: adept is _really_ slow.

2007-03-12 Thread Yuriy Kozlov
Are you still experiencing this problem in Edgy or Feisty?

** Changed in: ept (Ubuntu)
   Status: Unconfirmed = Needs Info

-- 
adept is _really_ slow. 
https://launchpad.net/bugs/49635

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 49635] Re: adept is _really_ slow.

2006-06-13 Thread mornfall
I don't consider that to be a bug.

** Changed in: ept (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Untriaged = Wishlist
 Assignee: (unassigned) = mornfall

-- 
adept is _really_ slow. 
https://launchpad.net/bugs/49635

--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs