[Bug 512002] Re: Unable to install using ext4

2010-08-12 Thread Jeremy Foshee
This bug report was marked as Incomplete and has not had any updated
comments for quite some time.  As a result this bug is being closed.
Please reopen if this is still an issue in the current Ubuntu
development release http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/ .
Also, please be sure to provide any requested information that may have
been missing.  To reopen the bug, click on the current status under the
Status column and change the status back to New.  Thanks.

[This is an automated message.  Apologies if it has reached you
inappropriately; please just reply to this message indicating so.]


** Tags added: kj-expired

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Expired

-- 
Unable to install using ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 512002] Re: Unable to install using ext4

2010-02-10 Thread Colin Watson
I'm not sure there's much ubiquity can do here; reassigning over to the
kernel since, if it verifiably isn't a hardware problem, then the kernel
is about the only other piece that could be broken ...

** Package changed: ubiquity (Ubuntu) = linux (Ubuntu)

-- 
Unable to install using ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 512002] Re: Unable to install using ext4

2010-02-04 Thread Jamin W. Collins
I've just experienced what appears to be the same type of issue trying
to install the 9.10 64-bit server edition inside a KVM virtual machine
that is using an LVM volume for its storage.  Every attempt to install
using EXT4 would fail with I/O errors and eventually the /target volume
being remounted read-only.  The host system shows no issue with the LVM
volume and several other VMs are running happily.  Simply changing the
partition format from EXT4 to EXT3 solved the issue and the VM completed
its installation without issue.

-- 
Unable to install using ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 512002] Re: Unable to install using ext4

2010-01-26 Thread Actiu informatica
Jakob Unterwurzacher, I don't know how to see the error message, because
partitioner crashes and restarts inmediately. But you are showing a
message in another phase than mine, ok.

-- 
Unable to install using ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 512002] Re: Unable to install using ext4

2010-01-26 Thread Jakob Unterwurzacher
Jamin, i have no explaination why this does not happen with ext3 (or
badblocks, or dd). On the other hand i cannot see how ext4 could trigger
ATA errors without some kind of hardware problem.

-- 
Unable to install using ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 512002] Re: Unable to install using ext4

2010-01-25 Thread Actiu informatica
I left my old bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/503848
to subscribe this more exact bug.

I think the package affected is partman-ext3 (Add to partman support for ext3 
and ext4).
I can select ext3 format for normal partitions (it's a solution for traditional 
installations), but is not possible to make a manual partitioning, create an 
encrypted volume (because of a multisystem hard disk), and when configuring 
that encrypted volume change its default ext4 format.

Steps to reproduce:
1. Make a boot CD with ubuntu-9.10-alternate-i386.iso
2. Boot, select language and install option, keyboard and time zone
3. Give a name for the system
4. Choose the manual partitioning method
5. In the unpartitioned space, create a primary partition and mark it to use as 
physical volume for encryption
6. Select the Configure encrypted volumes option, then choose the new 
partition, accept defaults, and write the password as required
7. Select the new appeared encrypted volume on top of the list.
8. You see that is selected to have an ext4 format by default; when you select 
this item to change, partman crashes and tries to restart with a Starting up 
the partitioner message that never completes, and you never return to 
partitioner/installer in this session (reboot needed, without solution).

Seeing that the Desktop installer doesn't give option to make manual 
partitioning with encryption, and the Debian Installer selects ext4 filesystem 
by default in manual partitioning (and crashes if you want to change the use):
KARMIC DOESN'T SEEM TO BE POSSIBLE TO BE INSTALLED ON AN ENCRYPTED VOLUME 
WITHOUT DELETING ALL THE DISK.

-- 
Unable to install using ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 512002] Re: Unable to install using ext4

2010-01-25 Thread Jakob Unterwurzacher
Actiu, i don't think this is related to this problem/bugreport. We don't
have LVM nor encryption here.

Jamin, do you have any data on this drive? The thing is,
badblocks /dev/sda1
does a read-only test. The journal error seems to be happening on write.

Could you try (boot from the Live CD)
badblocks -nvs /dev/sda1
(non-destructive read-write)

Or even
badblocks -wvs /dev/sda1
(destructive read-write, THIS WILL ERASE THE WHOLE PARTITON. And will take a 
long time.)

(if you don't care about data loss and want quick results, try this
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda bs=512 count=1 seek=38032000
dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/null bs=512 count=1 skip=38032000
THIS WILL ERASE RANDOM DATA ON THE PARTITION)

-- 
Unable to install using ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 512002] Re: Unable to install using ext4

2010-01-25 Thread Jamin W. Collins
@Jakob
No data on the drive, replicating this issue means allowing it to be utterly 
erased as the installer erases and automatically partitions the entire drive.

Currently I have it going through the destructive read-write you
referenced.  However, as you can see from the initial output it's not
having any problems with that.  I'll post the final output once it's
completed.

$ sudo badblocks -wvs /dev/sda1
Checking for bad blocks in read-write mode
From block 0 to 38331057
Testing with pattern 0xaa: done
Reading and comparing: done

-- 
Unable to install using ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 512002] Re: Unable to install using ext4

2010-01-25 Thread Actiu informatica
I've found the problem with LVM and Encryption because I've tried the alternate 
installation with these configurations.
The problem I've found (in 3 different computers) can be reproduced with:
- Xubuntu 9.10 alternate-CD i386
- Ubuntu 9.10 alternate-CD i386
- Ubuntu 10.04 (in development) Server i386

All other installations I've made (a lot), were successful with ext4
using the Desktop CD installer.

-- 
Unable to install using ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 512002] Re: Unable to install using ext4

2010-01-25 Thread Jamin W. Collins
Test completed with no bad blocks found:

$ sudo badblocks -wvs /dev/sda1
Checking for bad blocks in read-write mode
From block 0 to 38331057
Testing with pattern 0xaa: done
Reading and comparing: done
Testing with pattern 0x55: done
Reading and comparing: done
Testing with pattern 0xff: done
Reading and comparing: done
Testing with pattern 0x00: done
Reading and comparing: done
Pass completed, 0 bad blocks found.

-- 
Unable to install using ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 512002] Re: Unable to install using ext4

2010-01-25 Thread Jakob Unterwurzacher
@Actiu: Do you get an error message like this?
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38337359/install3.jpg - If not then I
think you are seeing a different problem. I have marked your bug 503848
as not-a-duplicate to prevent confusion.

@Jamin: Hmm, just as the SMART data said, the drive has no bad sectors.
(Side note: Old_Age just means that this value will be high when the
drive is old, and Pre-fail means that this value will increase when the
drive is failing.)

But this error (dmesg-install2.log) suggests that either the drive or the 
controller must be doing something wrong.
[  525.74] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
[  525.92] ata1.00: cmd e7/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/a0 tag 0
[  525.94]  res 40/00:00:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x4 
(timeout)
[  525.98] ata1.00: status: { DRDY }
[  530.004017] ata1: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
[  535.040086] ata1: device not ready (errno=-16), forcing hardreset
[  535.040101] ata1: soft resetting link
[  535.224838] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/66
[  535.224852] ata1.00: device reported invalid CHS sector 0
[  535.224894] ata1: EH complete
[  535.243216] end_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 38039071

I don't get why ext3 does not trigger it, but this error is independent
of the filesystem. Faulty hardware of a ATA driver bug?

-- 
Unable to install using ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 512002] Re: Unable to install using ext4

2010-01-25 Thread Jamin W. Collins
I would agree save that my experience indicates otherwise.  If I install
the system as ext3, I can use it without issue even stressing both the
system and the drive by running VMs under KVM.  All without issue.  If I
can install the base system, apply all updates, then fully allocate an 8
gig disk image to use with KVM, and then run a VM against the disk image
on the very same hardware that fails to even complete an ext4 base
system installation I'd say it's pretty safe to say that the hardware is
operating properly.  Simply changing the target file system to ext4
causes things to fail.

-- 
Unable to install using ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 512002] Re: Unable to install using ext4

2010-01-25 Thread Jamin W. Collins
Additionally, with the badblocks operation you've seen 4 complete writes
and reads of every location that good possibly be used by ext3 or 4 on
the drive (ie all of sda1).  Would executing something like the
following help rule out the controller and drive for you?

dmesg  dmesg-before.log
for i in $(seq 1 10); do
dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/sda bs=512
dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/null bs=512
done
dmesg  dmesg-after.log

I'd think if this were a controller or drive issue, 10 full iterations
over the entire drive would cause the issue to surface, no?

-- 
Unable to install using ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 512002] Re: Unable to install using ext4

2010-01-24 Thread Jakob Unterwurzacher
Do you have a screenshot or something of the kernel oops? Is the disk
okay? (smarctl -a /dev/sda)

-- 
Unable to install using ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 512002] Re: Unable to install using ext4

2010-01-24 Thread Jamin W. Collins
The drive does have a number of sections listed as Old_age, which is
understandable because it is a very old drive, along with a few sections
listed as Pre-fail.  However, the overall smartctl report is a pass.

=== START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED

I've attached the testing output.  I'll see about doing another
installation and try to capture the error being reported.

** Attachment added: sda-test.log
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38336800/sda-test.log

-- 
Unable to install using ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 512002] Re: Unable to install using ext4

2010-01-24 Thread Jamin W. Collins

** Attachment added: install1.jpg
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38337325/install1.jpg

-- 
Unable to install using ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 512002] Re: Unable to install using ext4

2010-01-24 Thread Jamin W. Collins

** Attachment added: install2.jpg
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38337341/install2.jpg

-- 
Unable to install using ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 512002] Re: Unable to install using ext4

2010-01-24 Thread Jamin W. Collins

** Attachment added: install3.jpg
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38337359/install3.jpg

-- 
Unable to install using ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 512002] Re: Unable to install using ext4

2010-01-24 Thread Jamin W. Collins
As you can see from the attached screenshots, when the error happens
isn't consistent, but it does appear to always happen when trying to use
ext4.  I've yet to experience the problem using ext3.

I was not able to capture a dmesg output from the first install as
connecting the USB stick to the system caused it to lock up.  For
installs 2 and 3 I started with the USB stick already connected.

** Attachment added: dmesg-install3.log
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38337424/dmesg-install3.log

-- 
Unable to install using ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 512002] Re: Unable to install using ext4

2010-01-24 Thread Jamin W. Collins

** Attachment added: dmesg-install2.log
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38337370/dmesg-install2.log

-- 
Unable to install using ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 512002] Re: Unable to install using ext4

2010-01-24 Thread Monkey
Please give the next (attachment) information, I´ve added a link for
that. Thank You for making Ubuntu better.

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingUbiquity/AttachingLogs

** Tags added: iso-testing

** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
Unable to install using ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 512002] Re: Unable to install using ext4

2010-01-24 Thread Jamin W. Collins
From what I can see on the referenced page, it's mainly for Ubiquity
crashing.  This is not the case, Ubiquity is not crashing, it's erroring
and then exiting without a crash, but also without a viable
installation.  The crash that is being detected is redirected to
#452208, but that report indicates it's a non-critical crash and the
installation should complete.  My installation does not complete.

Attaching the files anyway.

** Attachment added: syslog
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38341668/syslog

-- 
Unable to install using ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 512002] Re: Unable to install using ext4

2010-01-24 Thread Jamin W. Collins

** Attachment added: partman
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38341726/partman

-- 
Unable to install using ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 512002] Re: Unable to install using ext4

2010-01-24 Thread Jamin W. Collins

** Attachment added: debug
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38341760/debug

-- 
Unable to install using ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 512002] Re: Unable to install using ext4

2010-01-24 Thread Jakob Unterwurzacher
From dmesg-2:
[  535.243216] end_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 38039071
[  535.248144] Aborting journal on device sda1:8.
[  535.265712] EXT4-fs error (device sda1): ext4_journal_start_sb: Detected 
aborted journal
[  535.265727] EXT4-fs (sda1): Remounting filesystem read-only

dmesg-3:
[  997.211783] end_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 38032023

Looks like the drive has some trouble starting sector 38032023 despite smart 
saying it has 0 bad sectors.
That ext3 is not affected may be just luck. ext3 does no happen to have 
important data there.

You could use
badblocks /dev/sda1
to verify that it's bad blocks that are causing trouble.

The ubuntu installer does not check for bad blocks when formattiing. If
you want to use this drive, i think you will have to manually format
(mkfs.ext4 -cc /dev/sda1) and then tell the installer to use the
existing file system.

-- 
Unable to install using ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 512002] Re: Unable to install using ext4

2010-01-24 Thread Jamin W. Collins
While I see your logic, the command did not report any errors on the
drive.

-- 
Unable to install using ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs