[Bug 528326] Re: Sync libsynthesis 3.2.0.35+ds2-2 from debian sid
The current situation is bad: 1) syncevolution doesn't work 2) if I patch the current version with the linked patch _and_ delete the UbuntuOne addressbook, it works 3) if I install 1.0, it works Please decide what to do. If you find 2) is the most acceptable solution, I will provide a debdiff in a matter of hours. ** Changed in: libsynthesis (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- Sync libsynthesis 3.2.0.35+ds2-2 from debian sid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 528326] Re: Sync libsynthesis 3.2.0.35+ds2-2 from debian sid
Given that the current version of syncevolution doesn't work and that universe packages in 10.04 LTS are supportable for three years on the desktop, it makes sense to sync from testing instead of carrying a patch that also requires the user to delete her/his UO addressbook. -- Sync libsynthesis 3.2.0.35+ds2-2 from debian sid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 528326] Re: Sync libsynthesis 3.2.0.35+ds2-2 from debian sid
This is a sync request for libsynthesis, which was done; please don't overload this bug task for other issues. syncevolution is being synced from testing now. ** Changed in: libsynthesis (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- Sync libsynthesis 3.2.0.35+ds2-2 from debian sid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 528326] Re: Sync libsynthesis 3.2.0.35+ds2-2 from debian sid
I have been experimenting with several combinations of syncevolution and libsynthesis, and unfortunately I found that syncevolution 0.9.1+ds1-1 currently doesn't work in combination with _any_ libsynthesis version, triggering the bug described at 2) in my first comment: evolution-data- server at 100% of CPU, and nothing happens. The bug had disappeared in some upgrade of evolution-data-server, but later was reintroduced, and now happens _always_. That's why I wasn't able so far to test the specific compatibility of the new libsynthesis with the current syncevolution. Instead, syncevolution 1.0+ds1~beta2a, which is in sid since 15 days (stopped from migrating to testing only by architectures not supported by Ubuntu and dependencies already present in Lucid) works perfectly in my (massive) tests. Now: 1.0 _does_ introduce new features - namely, the ability of syncing without a third-party server - but I think it is still by far the best way to solve the current problem. Obviously, it _may_ be that at some point before the release of Lucid I upgrade evolution-data-server again and everything works again... but I have no clue on that. That said: assuming that the request to sync 1.0+ds1~beta2a is _not_ accepted, and assuming that the 100% CPU bug is somehow solved, the upstream developers (who don't use lucid and _don't see_ the 100% CPU bug) have said that the current syncevolution and libsynthesis are _probably_ compatible apart from one particular problem - in brief, after one applies the patch at http://lists.syncevolution.org/pipermail/syncevolution/attachments/20100309/11670673/attachment.bin -- Sync libsynthesis 3.2.0.35+ds2-2 from debian sid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 528326] Re: Sync libsynthesis 3.2.0.35+ds2-2 from debian sid
(just to avoid ambiguity: I strongly suggest importing 1.0, if it is not really impossible given the release process) -- Sync libsynthesis 3.2.0.35+ds2-2 from debian sid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 528326] Re: Sync libsynthesis 3.2.0.35+ds2-2 from debian sid
** Changed in: libsynthesis (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Released -- Sync libsynthesis 3.2.0.35+ds2-2 from debian sid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 528326] Re: Sync libsynthesis 3.2.0.35+ds2-2 from debian sid
AHEM... what you synced is apparently not 3.2.0.35+ds2-2 , which was the most recent present in Debian unstable when I filed this request, but 3.4.0.5+ds1-1 , which is in unstable since just 2 days. I may ask to upstream and debian maintainer if 3.4.0.5+ds1-1 is acceptable with the currently available version of syncevolution (and I think the answer would be positive), but I won't if, as I imagine, after you read this you will immediately revert the sync to 3.2.0.35+ds2-2 (in case the information could prove useful, that version migrated to testing 3 days ago). If instead you decide to keep the currently synced version - which, by the way, could incidentally solve the problem with Ubuntu One mentioned in the first of my comments - I will obviously test it and try to ensure all is fine. -- Sync libsynthesis 3.2.0.35+ds2-2 from debian sid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 528326] Re: Sync libsynthesis 3.2.0.35+ds2-2 from debian sid
It's too late. We can't go back to 3.2.0.35+ds2-2 easily. If there are no grave issues with the new version, we will stay with 3.4.0.5+ds1-1. -- Sync libsynthesis 3.2.0.35+ds2-2 from debian sid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 528326] Re: Sync libsynthesis 3.2.0.35+ds2-2 from debian sid
Sorry, it's not possible to revert a package sync; the only thing that can be done from here is to do a new upload of the previous upstream version with an artificially higher version number. Please investigate whether 3.4.0.5 is ok for us, and let us know if it wlll be a problem. -- Sync libsynthesis 3.2.0.35+ds2-2 from debian sid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 528326] Re: Sync libsynthesis 3.2.0.35+ds2-2 from debian sid
package builds, sync request ACK'd ** Changed in: libsynthesis (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Triaged ** Changed in: libsynthesis (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist -- Sync libsynthesis 3.2.0.35+ds2-2 from debian sid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 528326] Re: Sync libsynthesis 3.2.0.35+ds2-2 from debian sid
ACK, FFe granted, please go ahead. ** Changed in: libsynthesis (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Sync libsynthesis 3.2.0.35+ds2-2 from debian sid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 528326] Re: Sync libsynthesis 3.2.0.35+ds2-2 from debian sid
Just for the records: after upgrading evolution to version 2.28.3-0ubuntu2 , problem 2) seems to have disappeared. -- Sync libsynthesis 3.2.0.35+ds2-2 from debian sid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 528326] Re: Sync libsynthesis 3.2.0.35+ds2-2 from debian sid
Hello, the benefits of the release are: - the linked bug, which it fixes, was (is) cause of data corruption! - other refinements and bugfixes have been made by the developers the risk of regressions is quite limited, because: - syncevolution and the relative libraries are tipically high quality and tested code, as can be deduced for instance from the very low number of bugs present in Debian and Ubuntu (compared with the increasing popcon) - the debian package is out since one month and a half and in unstable since two weeks - in other words, it was presumably tested much more than some packages that enter Ubuntu automatically - the debian maintainer and the upstream developers are very responsive, and I'm in contact with both - in any case, the most important feature added - namely, the ability for syncevolution to act as a syncml server - was only made available in 1.0, which will certainly not enter Lucid. So the current syncevolution configuration is anyway quite conservative. - by the way, syncevolution (with sync-ui) is the only rdepend of libsynthesis That said, it must be noticed that the package _is having_ some problems in lucid, but they are not regressions: 1) it doesn't play well with the Ubuntu One contacts: this is known upstream, but I think it's to late for the fix to enter lucid. This is not a regression of syncevolution, though the fact that now (or maybe even in Karmic? sorry, I ignore) Ubuntu One holds contacts by default makes the worsen the issue. 2) in a vast percentage of tests, syncevolution hangs with evolution- data-server using all the available CPU: this is very unfortunate, but it happens with the current version of syncevolution as well, and hence seems to be a problem on the evolution side: I will anyway keep testing that and try to isolate the problem. -- Sync libsynthesis 3.2.0.35+ds2-2 from debian sid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 528326] Re: Sync libsynthesis 3.2.0.35+ds2-2 from debian sid
I forgot to add the build (pbuilder) log. Notice that unfortunately NEWS and ChangeLog are both empty. ** Attachment added: Build (pbuilder) log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39920213/log.txt -- Sync libsynthesis 3.2.0.35+ds2-2 from debian sid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
