[Bug 668145] Re: Font preferences not available anymore, internal font changed
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 593971 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/593971 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 593971 Rich Text in EEschema -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668145 Title: Font preferences not available anymore, internal font changed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/668145/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 668145] Re: Font preferences not available anymore, internal font changed
** Tags removed: oneiric ** Tags added: fonts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668145 Title: Font preferences not available anymore, internal font changed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/668145/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 668145] Re: Font preferences not available anymore, internal font changed
** Changed in: kicad Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668145 Title: Font preferences not available anymore, internal font changed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/668145/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 668145] Re: Font preferences not available anymore, internal font changed
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 04:28:58AM -, Daniel Santos wrote: From a cursory examination of the Gerber spec (which I've never worked with before). It looks like the appropriate way to render an arbitrary font from it's vector representation is to render each non-contiguous shape of each glyph as a single contour (enable region mode with G36, draw the contour and then end the region mode with G37). Now this is tricky for many reasons. The recommended way to render arbitrary images/fonts in gerber (and AFAIK the approach used by every CAD supporting truetype fonts in gerber) is using horizontal rasters. Usually the raster pitch is wide as the aperture or maybe half of it for better edge quality; also the raster approach actually follows the mechanics of the silkscreen process (which *is* done on a raster of wires...) I did a proof-of-concept demo some year ago (about when we switched from the 'squared' font) but the idea wasn't pursued for lack of interest (and display performance reasons, too). Another reason is that the plotting infrastructure need to implement text in postscript/PDF too and that is even more tricky than gerber. -- Lorenzo Marcantonio Logos Srl -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668145 Title: Font preferences not available anymore, internal font changed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/668145/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 668145] Re: Font preferences not available anymore, internal font changed
http://timeguy.com/cradek/truetype Is this anything? On Oct 13, 2013 2:25 AM, Lorenzo Marcantonio 668...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 04:28:58AM -, Daniel Santos wrote: From a cursory examination of the Gerber spec (which I've never worked with before). It looks like the appropriate way to render an arbitrary font from it's vector representation is to render each non-contiguous shape of each glyph as a single contour (enable region mode with G36, draw the contour and then end the region mode with G37). Now this is tricky for many reasons. The recommended way to render arbitrary images/fonts in gerber (and AFAIK the approach used by every CAD supporting truetype fonts in gerber) is using horizontal rasters. Usually the raster pitch is wide as the aperture or maybe half of it for better edge quality; also the raster approach actually follows the mechanics of the silkscreen process (which *is* done on a raster of wires...) I did a proof-of-concept demo some year ago (about when we switched from the 'squared' font) but the idea wasn't pursued for lack of interest (and display performance reasons, too). Another reason is that the plotting infrastructure need to implement text in postscript/PDF too and that is even more tricky than gerber. -- Lorenzo Marcantonio Logos Srl -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of KiCad Bug Squad, which is subscribed to KiCad. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668145 Title: Font preferences not available anymore, internal font changed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/668145/+subscriptions -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668145 Title: Font preferences not available anymore, internal font changed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/668145/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 668145] Re: Font preferences not available anymore, internal font changed
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 08:49:40AM -, Dick Hollenbeck wrote: http://timeguy.com/cradek/truetype Is this anything? Extracting the outlines from a TT is not difficult, actually... freetype can give it to you ready to plot (FT_Outline_Decompose), you only have to mess a little with quadric/cubic curves. The problem is that the result at the small sizes used for silks and stuff is... well, disappointing. That changes of course if you have access to photo-silk instead of true silkscreening... Also the cut-in feature for gerber fill seems a little tricky to use. The problem outlined in pages 50-51 of the specs make me think a lot of experimentation and care is needed. I think it could be done (good quality results are not guaranteed, anyway...). There *is* a reason for the major cad manufacturer to recommend stroke fonts in place of outline ones. -- Lorenzo Marcantonio Logos Srl -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668145 Title: Font preferences not available anymore, internal font changed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/668145/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 668145] Re: Font preferences not available anymore, internal font changed
On 10/13/2013 04:49 AM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote: http://timeguy.com/cradek/truetype Is this anything? On Oct 13, 2013 2:25 AM, Lorenzo Marcantonio 668...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 04:28:58AM -, Daniel Santos wrote: From a cursory examination of the Gerber spec (which I've never worked with before). It looks like the appropriate way to render an arbitrary font from it's vector representation is to render each non-contiguous shape of each glyph as a single contour (enable region mode with G36, draw the contour and then end the region mode with G37). Now this is tricky for many reasons. This is the hard part and what I was eluding to in the previous conversation. I've never used the FreeType library but looking at the API it looks like it provides a way to convert any font type it supports to strokes as Lorenzo pointed out. The difficult part is accurately converting this output into the gerber or any other file format for that matter. Obviously it can be done. Other applications do it all the time. However, this will require a lot of testing and visual comparison which is always fraught errors. Over the years I've seen some very expensive board layout software do a very poor job of rendering fonts to gerbers. If we want to provide this for our users, I want make sure we do it properly. At least the current line drawn fonts are accurate which IMHO is more important when manufacturing PCBs than inaccurate fancy TT fonts. The recommended way to render arbitrary images/fonts in gerber (and AFAIK the approach used by every CAD supporting truetype fonts in gerber) is using horizontal rasters. Usually the raster pitch is wide as the aperture or maybe half of it for better edge quality; also the raster approach actually follows the mechanics of the silkscreen process (which *is* done on a raster of wires...) I did a proof-of-concept demo some year ago (about when we switched from the 'squared' font) but the idea wasn't pursued for lack of interest (and display performance reasons, too). Maybe with the forthcoming OpenGL rendering, the performance issues will be less of an issue. Of course, this means you would have to modify both the GAL and the wxDC renderer to support FreeType fonts until all of the KiCad rendering has been ported over to the OpenGL GAL. Another reason is that the plotting infrastructure need to implement text in postscript/PDF too and that is even more tricky than gerber. Yes. All of the output formats that KiCad supports would have to be modified to support the new fonts as well. Now we have a more accurate view of how large the task really is and there are probably some other parts of KiCad this will effect (file formats?) that we haven't even considered. I am all for high quality fonts for KiCad but I am opposed to a partial implementation for obvious reasons. I am not trying to discourage anyone and I think it is a great idea. I am only trying to make sure anyone who takes on this task understands what's involved. -- Lorenzo Marcantonio Logos Srl -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of KiCad Bug Squad, which is subscribed to KiCad. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668145 Title: Font preferences not available anymore, internal font changed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/668145/+subscriptions -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668145 Title: Font preferences not available anymore, internal font changed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/668145/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 668145] Re: Font preferences not available anymore, internal font changed
I am all for high quality fonts for KiCad but I am opposed to a partial implementation for obvious reasons. It may be worthwhile to consider partial implementation as an explicitly and loudly marked EXPERIMENTAL feature. Such a feature would typically have the text (EXPERIMENTAL) next to it in whatever menu or dialog box where it is enabled and when enabled, a pop-up appears explaining to the user what they are getting into when they enable it. I'm reccomending this because projects following an iterative delivery model are historically more successful those following the waterfall model (i.e., everything at once). Further, since we are open source, these experimental features can be enabled/disabled via the configure/cmake script. :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668145 Title: Font preferences not available anymore, internal font changed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/668145/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 668145] Re: Font preferences not available anymore, internal font changed
Fritzing project also staring at this quandary : https://code.google.com/p/fritzing/issues/detail?id=1568 Also, of possible interest is this dxf2gbr utility: http://www.artwork.com/acad/engine/index.htm From a cursory examination of the Gerber spec (which I've never worked with before). It looks like the appropriate way to render an arbitrary font from it's vector representation is to render each non-contiguous shape of each glyph as a single contour (enable region mode with G36, draw the contour and then end the region mode with G37). Now this is tricky for many reasons. The recommended way to render arbitrary images/fonts in gerber (and AFAIK the approach used by every CAD supporting truetype fonts in gerber) is using horizontal rasters. Usually the raster pitch is wide as the aperture or maybe half of it for better edge quality; also the raster approach actually follows the mechanics of the silkscreen process (which *is* done on a raster of wires...) Hmm, while I'm not certain, we may be talking about the same thing, but from a different standpoint. I don't see any reference in the gerber spec to the word raster. If you are talking about drawing straight lines with an apeture to to rasterize your own image, I'm wondering if this falls into the catagory of stroke painting which unamco is claiming to be harmful (see the PDF named Gerber File Format: Painting Considered Harmful on the page http://www.ucamco.com/downloads.aspx). However, it was my understanding that a modern photoplotter would take your contour regions and rasterize them to produce the final output, leaving you to just draw what you need in as simple of terms as possible and let the plotter rasterize it. Please correct me if I'm misunderstanding something here. ** Bug watch added: code.google.com/p/fritzing/issues #1568 https://code.google.com/p/fritzing/issues/detail?id=1568 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668145 Title: Font preferences not available anymore, internal font changed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/668145/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 668145] Re: Font preferences not available anymore, internal font changed
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 06:04:46PM -, Daniel Santos wrote: Hmm, while I'm not certain, we may be talking about the same thing, but from a different standpoint. I don't see any reference in the gerber spec to the word raster. If you are talking about drawing straight lines with an apeture to to rasterize your own image, I'm wondering if this falls into the catagory of stroke painting which unamco is claiming to be harmful (see the PDF named Gerber File Format: Painting Considered Harmful on the page http://www.ucamco.com/downloads.aspx). Yes, that is however referred to copper pours. It is indeed a deprecated way to fill zones (however pcbnew still supports it), mainly because it's difficult to handle with CAM processors, to check netlists and fabrication rules. However text is (hopefully) far from copper areas or on the silkscreen so it doesn't suffer from these drawbacks. The main problem with area fills with fonts it the model used to represent outlines and suboutlines (i.e. internal cutouts); the font model uses the common 'postscript' model: - Outlines are described with lines, quadric and cubic curves, depending on the font: truetype uses quadrics, Type1/CFF uses cubics; lines are represented as the obvious degeneration of said curves; orientation of the (sub)outlines is consistent and mandatory (I don't remember the details); - Sub-outlines are handled closing the current outline and opening a new one. Inner area is described (IIRC) using the winding rule (need to check for details on this and on self intersecting outlines). If you ever used Corel Draw/Adobe Illustrator/Inkscape that's the usual graphic model for handling outlines. Gerber instead uses a way different (and simpler) model for outlines: - Outlines are described with lines and circular arcs (as different primitives), orientation is not defined nor required; - There are no suboutlines, internal cutouts have to be represented with a zero-width isthmus cutting thru the filled area to the cutout. Page 49 better explains that. The most similar thing I can think of are autocad polylines and shapes. In fact SHP/SHX fonts are described exactly as polylines and I actually have a working converter from SHP to the Hershey encoding used by kicad (my ISO branch uses an hand-tuned version of the ISOCP font). The first difference is easily handled approximating the curves with lines (fun fact: the bezier curves used by fonts can't actually exactly describe circular arcs, which are the only gerber supported curves). However the difference on suboutlines need to be resolved with a numerically stable way to find a good point to cut the filled area: think about the eye in the R glyph: you need to find a non self-intersecting line connecting the perimeter with the eye (the @ glyph is left as an exercise:D). The stability condition is needed because the entry line and the exit line must be exactly overlapped to avoid artifacts (remember: they can't self intersect so they must be the same!). I'm not saying it can't be done but needs considerable computational geometry experience (which I don't have...i.e. I haven't a good idea on how to do it in the general case). However, it was my understanding that a modern photoplotter would take your contour regions and rasterize them to produce the final output, leaving you to just draw what you need in as simple of terms as possible and let the plotter rasterize it. Please correct me if I'm misunderstanding something here. Yes, the plotter give you a (polyesther, probably) film with these characteristics. However usually the film simply produces an images over a coarse grid of wires (which can even have 0.2mm pitch with some processes!). Look here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ssc.jpg There are different, more expensive, processes which gives you better resolution, of course. Anyway all the board I've seen screened with a non-vector font had the raster shapes quite visible under magnification (you see the round line caps on the left and side of the letters), so I'd assume that's the industry standard practice. The idea of using gerber fills for filling glyphs is interesting anyway, let me know if you manage to handle that. -- Lorenzo Marcantonio Logos Srl -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668145 Title: Font preferences not available anymore, internal font changed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/668145/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 668145] Re: Font preferences not available anymore, internal font changed
From a cursory examination of the Gerber spec (which I've never worked with before). It looks like the appropriate way to render an arbitrary font from it's vector representation is to render each non-contiguous shape of each glyph as a single contour (enable region mode with G36, draw the contour and then end the region mode with G37). Now this is tricky for many reasons. 1. The contour cannot self-intersect, except for coincidental segments, i.e., those who's start and end vertices are identical. This isn't a bad thing alone. The bad part is that non-coincidental intersections can occur due to rounding, creating a bad gerber for one device that is rendering it, but not another. :( Thus, we have to know in advance what this minimal pixel rounding value will be so we don't accidentally generate a bad gerber. 2. We don't get to work with actual polynomials, so everything has to be converted into straight lines and arcs. 3. Dealing with holes in glyphs (as in the letters 'O', 'p' and 'B') is a little bit of a pain because you have to add them as additional layers. If that hole needs to have something inside of it (I can't think of any English or Latin character examples), then 3 layers must be used, etc. So I would say that the way to perform this conversion is basically to have some type of resolution setting, but not in pixels, just to say how the glyph will be approximated and control the number of gerber instructions. Then an engine to render the glyphs into approximations using straight lines and arcs (for the outline) followed by holes (and possibly shapes within those holes, as there are quite likely languages that will need this). All of this while avoiding illegal overlaps in verticies as they may occur after rounding, even rounding as a result of progressive processing on a single contour! (See ยง4.4.8 of the spec, page 58 for one example of this.) To make this even more fun, it would seem that there would also be a need to render the font on-screen that way as well, so that we can actually see what we're going to get. I suppose, that that part won't be as difficult as the actual conversion into a gerber-compatible format, although it sounds like it may be a pain. For example, if rendering straight to opengl, you can't draw convex polygons, you have to break them into triangles, etc. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668145 Title: Font preferences not available anymore, internal font changed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/668145/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 668145] Re: Font preferences not available anymore, internal font changed
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: kicad (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668145 Title: Font preferences not available anymore, internal font changed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/668145/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 668145] Re: Font preferences not available anymore, internal font changed
Hello guys. I see that this bug is fairly old, but as a person recently introduced to Kicad, I must tell you that the font appearance was an immediate turn-off! I know this sounds bubble-gum, twitter-ish, gen-me shallow, but first appearances really have a profound impact on the *perception* of quality. It's been a while since I've played with fonts, but I agree that the font should not be compiled in and one should definately NOT have to manually draw a font! In fact, by zooming in on the schematic view and not researching at all, I could tell that the font was custom made from straight lines. So in other words, it's obvious. It is my uneducated opinion that we *should* be able to use some existing font library to transform vector fonts into the language of gerber without too much problem, although I can't comment on what it would take to make the change in kicad. IMHO, the design should have abstracted the font from the start, although I realize the importance of sometimes just getting a product done and accepting costs like hard- coded fonts. Is anybody still working on this? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668145 Title: Font preferences not available anymore, internal font changed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/668145/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 668145] Re: Font preferences not available anymore, internal font changed
On 10/11/2013 2:19 PM, Daniel Santos wrote: Hello guys. I see that this bug is fairly old, but as a person recently introduced to Kicad, I must tell you that the font appearance was an immediate turn-off! I know this sounds bubble-gum, twitter-ish, gen-me shallow, but first appearances really have a profound impact on the *perception* of quality. It's been a while since I've played with fonts, but I agree that the font should not be compiled in and one should definately NOT have to manually draw a font! In fact, by zooming in on the schematic view and not researching at all, I could tell that the font was custom made from straight lines. So in other words, it's obvious. If you read all of messages in this bug report, I don't think anyone would disagree with you that the stroke fonts are less than ideal. They do allow us to guarantee the accuracy of the output. It is my uneducated opinion that we *should* be able to use some existing font library to transform vector fonts into the language of gerber without too much problem, although I can't comment on what it would take to make the change in kicad. IMHO, the design should have abstracted the font from the start, although I realize the importance of sometimes just getting a product done and accepting costs like hard- coded fonts. I doubt there is anything easy about using some existing font library to transform them into the gerber format unless you don't care about accuracy or someone else is doing the work ( which I find are always the easiest tasks to do :) ). If it was easy, someone would have done it by now. KiCad is getting to the point where there are not many easy tasks left to do. Most of the wishlist issues are very significant development efforts that require some financial incentive to motivate developers to work on them or high quality patches that don't require a huge amount of lead developer time to commit. While I agree that there is a difference between rendering fonts in the schematic editor where the output accuracy isn't as critical as the board font rendering, Pcbnew and Eeschema share common font rendering code so it's not that easy to replace. Is anybody still working on this? I don't think anyone ever worked on this other than take a look at the effort involved. If you are feeling motivated, by all means give it a try. We are always looking for motivate developers who are willing to work with the KiCad development team. Wayne -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668145 Title: Font preferences not available anymore, internal font changed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/668145/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 668145] Re: Font preferences not available anymore, internal font changed
or someone else is doing the work ( which I find are always the easiest tasks to do :) ). Yes, so very true! :) If you are feeling motivated, by all means give it a try. We are always looking for motivate developers who are willing to work with the KiCad development team. Sadly, I'm famous for getting side-tracked by stuff like this so maybe I can at least investigate it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668145 Title: Font preferences not available anymore, internal font changed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/668145/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 668145] Re: Font preferences not available anymore, internal font changed
ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4 Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 NonfreeKernelModules: ksplice_pbmwgiu0_vmlinux_new ksplice_pbmwgiu0 ksplice_ct7sazfs ksplice_krmjnvxg ksplice_hx623fn0 ksplice_4oeja2uc ksplice_41483s1e_vmlinux_new ksplice_41483s1e ksplice_6dc7tpwy_vmlinux_new ksplice_6dc7tpwy ksplice_afp00loi_vmlinux_new ksplice_afp00loi ksplice_teqoo91w_vmlinux_new ksplice_teqoo91w ksplice_qyp5yxfp_vmlinux_new ksplice_qyp5yxfp ksplice_vxo5sfg6_vmlinux_new ksplice_vxo5sfg6 ksplice_xjvtfy6n_vmlinux_new ksplice_xjvtfy6n ksplice_aoyveuuh_vmlinux_new ksplice_aoyveuuh ksplice_uxyxwka2_vmlinux_new ksplice_uxyxwka2 nvidia Package: kicad 0.0.20110616-1 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=(custom, user) LANG=nb_NO.UTF-8 LANGUAGE=nb_NO:nb:no_NO:no:nn_NO:nn:en ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.20-generic-pae 3.0.4 Tags: oneiric Uname: Linux 3.0.0-12-generic-pae i686 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2011-10-14 (88 days ago) UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy fuse lpadmin plugdev vboxusers video ** Changed in: kicad Status: New = Confirmed ** Also affects: kicad (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags added: apport-collected oneiric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668145 Title: Font preferences not available anymore, internal font changed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/668145/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
