[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
I suppose revision 113 that Zygmunt talked about is now https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~zyga/command-not-found/trunk/revision/113 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862 Title: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/command-not-found/+bug/92862/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
Zygmunt, I hope you are still following this ticket. You marked the upstream ticket as fix released. Did your code ever make it into an official upstream release? What version? ** Changed in: command-not-found (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862 Title: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/command-not-found/+bug/92862/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
** Changed in: command-not-found Assignee: sanjay (sanjay-enrogel) = (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862 Title: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/command-not-found/+bug/92862/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
** Changed in: command-not-found Assignee: (unassigned) = sanjay (sanjay-enrogel) ** Changed in: command-not-found (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862 Title: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/command-not-found/+bug/92862/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
As far as I know, this is still not fixed. ** Changed in: command-not-found (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Triaged ** Changed in: command-not-found Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- Shouldn't be apt-get-centric https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
Please don't change the status on upstream project. This was fixed in: lp:command-not-found/lucid revno 113 (http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~zkrynicki/command-not- found/lucid/revision/113) it just never got to ubuntu. ** Changed in: command-not-found Status: Confirmed = Fix Released ** Changed in: command-not-found Assignee: Zygmunt Krynicki (zkrynicki) = (unassigned) -- Shouldn't be apt-get-centric https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
I have heard this aptitude is prefered before but have never seen any official documentation to support it. From the dpkg man page: dpkg is a tool to install, build, remove and manage Debian packages. The primary and more user-friendly front-end for dpkg is aptitude(1). I agree with Evan that there should be some global configuration for this, but it seems to me that aptitude as a default is better than apt- get, and we're going to need a default either way. -- Shouldn't be apt-get-centric https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
Zygmunt, I had a look at the bzr branch and I don't see anything. Can you give me a pointer where this is released? -- Shouldn't be apt-get-centric https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
** Changed in: command-not-found Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- Shouldn't be apt-get-centric https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
** Changed in: command-not-found Importance: Undecided = Wishlist -- Shouldn't be apt-get-centric https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
I will work on a lucid branch this evening. I'll post updates here -- Shouldn't be apt-get-centric https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
Branch is ready, I just need to publish this ** Changed in: command-not-found (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = In Progress ** Changed in: command-not-found (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Zygmunt Krynicki (zkrynicki) -- Shouldn't be apt-get-centric https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
Sorry, it's hard to aim on this lousy touchpad, the fix is not released jet, just commited ** Changed in: command-not-found (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed ** Also affects: command-not-found Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: command-not-found Status: New = Fix Released ** Changed in: command-not-found Assignee: (unassigned) = Zygmunt Krynicki (zkrynicki) ** Changed in: command-not-found Status: Fix Released = Fix Committed ** Changed in: command-not-found (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = In Progress ** Changed in: command-not-found (Ubuntu) Assignee: Zygmunt Krynicki (zkrynicki) = Michael Vogt (mvo) -- Shouldn't be apt-get-centric https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
** Changed in: command-not-found Milestone: None = 0.2.41 -- Shouldn't be apt-get-centric https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
Can you provide something for testing? -- Shouldn't be apt-get-centric https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
Zygmunt, thank you for your continued support. Any chance we may see this in Lucid? -- Shouldn't be apt-get-centric https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
I think that depends on Lucid freeze time. A simple fix shoud do it. -- Shouldn't be apt-get-centric https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
Two things: 1. It would be cool if this could be globally configured, as well as per-user configured. Religious battles aside, I have a personal preference for aptitude, and would like to encourage users on systems I administer to use it. 2. It would also be cool if I could replace apt-get install with an arbitrary string, instead of just choosing between apt-get and aptitude, as well as having config frobs for whether or not sudo is necessary. In particular, I could see wanting to transition to using PackageKit in the future, so ideally I should be able to tell unprivileged users to use pkgcon install foo instead of sudo apt-get install foo -- Shouldn't be apt-get-centric https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
** Changed in: command-not-found (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Triaged -- Shouldn't be apt-get-centric https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
I don't see any such code anywhere, not even in the Jaunty source. $ rgrep install-package-cmd command-not-found-0.2.31ubuntu2/ $ -- Shouldn't be apt-get-centric https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
Zygmunt seems to be busy and not actively working on this. Reassigning back to nobody. ** Changed in: command-not-found (Ubuntu) Assignee: Zygmunt Krynicki (zkrynicki) = (unassigned) -- Shouldn't be apt-get-centric https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
I'm sorry I don't really have time to get this fixed ATM (basically I don't do source uploads which means I cannot control how the code is fixed etc). To put the story to an end: 1) Yes there *was* some support for this in my code (I wrote it back 3 ubuntu cycles from now) 2) I think the code was never released due to 0.2 - 0.3 failed rewrite and multiple versions actually shipped by Ubuntu (which are now de facto latest version) 3) Yes there is no *released* version that supports this I'd love to fix this but maintaining this package is a pain in the neck: * building the database requires tons of bandwidth or someone to constantly help you at canonical * python has some nasty issues that I didn't know of when I started - it's better to rewrite this in C * I have a full-time job and a family which kind of get in the way -- Shouldn't be apt-get-centric https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
Zygmunt, thank you for taking the time to reply. Your previous work is appreciated. Excuse me if I'm being naive, but I took a brief look at the sources today (even hardwired aptitude into c-n-f instead of apt-get) and wouldn't it be just replacing the hardcoded strings that are present now with some variable that either holds aptitude or apt-get? The variable would have a sane default (I'd say aptitude), but a user- defined override in a config file would be honoured. Am I overlooking something or did you have bigger things in mind to fix alongside? -- Shouldn't be apt-get-centric https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
No you're right - it's very easy to fix this. I added a configuration file (per user) that allows you to choose aptitude. Simple variable was not enough because I think with apt you need two programs and with aptitude you only needed one and I had some localization issues. I cannot remember exactly. As for my whines - they are generally expressing why I'm not touching c-n-f for quite a while. They are not specific to this problem (except for the part that I didn't ever upload fixes to ubuntu myself and always needed help with that which does slow things down) -- Shouldn't be apt-get-centric https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
Zygmunt, are you sure there is such code? Still not working in Intrepid. -- Shouldn't be apt-get-centric https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
Reopening, since even on hardy, command-not-found still insists on apt- get (I think the argument that aptitude should be default if nothing else has been specified has some merit) $ cat ~/.command-not-found/install-package-cmd aptitude install yet, nothing ** Changed in: command-not-found (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Confirmed -- Shouldn't be apt-get-centric https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
Hmm apparently for some reason aptitude vs apt-get selection code is missing in Hardy -- Shouldn't be apt-get-centric https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
I strongly disagree about not telling the user exactly how to install a package. This is mostly intended for new users that cannot search package directory yet and are stuck looking for something they want to use. Debian can replace the default value and recommend aptitude instead. -- Shouldn't be apt-get-centric https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
Debian recommends aptitude over apt-get [1]. I think that command-not-found should just say install package instead of saying the exact command to install the package. [1] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ch-package.en.html#s -apt-commands -- Shouldn't be apt-get-centric https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
I had thought that (despite aptitude being horribly slow) the recommended command line package tool was aptitude and not apt-get. If this is the case it seems strange that the command line magic in ubuntu points users to apt-get install instead of aptitude install. -- Shouldn't be apt-get-centric https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
The next version that is not included in feisty has a perference option that allows you select either one. -- Shouldn't be apt-get-centric https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
I have heard this aptitude is prefered before but have never seen any official documentation to support it. I appreciate that some people prefer it, but that's personal preference not Ubuntu policy as far as I can see. The official docs don't even mention aptitude:- https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Repositories/CommandLine Whilst aptitide is mentioned all over the wiki and help sites, that seems to be just where the editor of the page happens to use aptitude themselves, not for any particular development decision reason. -- Shouldn't be apt-get-centric https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
apt-get's autoremove sucks, sorry. It wants to autoremove like half my system right now, and there's no way to tell it, No, I _WANT_ to keep these packages! Aptitude, however, is being very nice about it and not mentioning any packages right now. In fact, aptitude can actually autoremove old kernel images so my 54 MiB /boot partition doesn't max out with only 3 kernels every time. Aptitude also has better dependency handling and can recover from errors when packages fail to install/configure (without leaving your system hosed). I suggest that this bug be expanded to Ubuntu in general. Debian 4.0 (and probably 3.1) recommends usage of aptitude over apt-get in most situations (especially when it comes to dependencies). -- Shouldn't be apt-get-centric https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
Matt, maybe you should file a bug against apt-get rather than comment here where it wont necessarily get seen. -- Shouldn't be apt-get-centric https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
Implemented an extension that searches for ~/.command-not-found/install- package-cmd. If you put something like 'aptitude install' it will pick it up and display it instead of 'apt-get install' ** Changed in: command-not-found (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Zygmunt Krynicki Status: Needs Info = Fix Committed -- Shouldn't be apt-get-centric https://launchpad.net/bugs/92862 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
apt-get also has autoremove:- --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get install links2 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following extra packages will be installed: libdirectfb-0.9-25 libsvga1 The following NEW packages will be installed libdirectfb-0.9-25 libsvga1 links2 0 upgraded, 3 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/3220kB of archives. After unpacking 5857kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Selecting previously deselected package libdirectfb-0.9-25. (Reading database ... 23669 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libdirectfb-0.9-25 (from .../libdirectfb-0.9-25_0.9.25.1-5ubuntu2_i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package libsvga1. Unpacking libsvga1 (from .../libsvga1_1%3a1.4.3-24_i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package links2. Unpacking links2 (from .../links2_2.1pre26-4build1_i386.deb) ... Setting up libdirectfb-0.9-25 (0.9.25.1-5ubuntu2) ... Setting up libsvga1 (1.4.3-24) ... Setting up links2 (2.1pre26-4build1) ... --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get autoremove links2 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: libsvga1 libdirectfb-0.9-25 The following packages will be REMOVED libdirectfb-0.9-25 libsvga1 links2 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 3 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 5857kB disk space will be freed. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? (Reading database ... 23778 files and directories currently installed.) Removing links2 ... Removing libdirectfb-0.9-25 ... Removing libsvga1 ... -- Shouldn't be apt-get-centric https://launchpad.net/bugs/92862 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 11:30 +, Alan Pope wrote: apt-get also has autoremove:- That's news to me, but my argument still stands, people might prefer other package managers. -- Bruce Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Shouldn't be apt-get-centric https://launchpad.net/bugs/92862 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
Thanks for your bugreport. Out of interesst, what do you use? aptitude? dselect? Cheer,s Michael ** Changed in: command-not-found (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist Status: Unconfirmed = Needs Info -- Shouldn't be apt-get-centric https://launchpad.net/bugs/92862 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92862] Re: Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
aptitude, thanks to it's lovely auto-removal handling. -- Shouldn't be apt-get-centric https://launchpad.net/bugs/92862 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
