[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2011-05-11 Thread Timo Aaltonen
Closing this one, since 1.10.1 in natty has all the memleaks fixed that
were found with analyzer tools.

When the Xorg process shows taking a lot of memory, it's usually a rogue
client or the display driver leaking, and the xserver is caching pixmap
memory. This is not a bug in the xserver, and should be filed against
the client or the driver.

** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783

Title:
  MASTER: memory leak

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2010-12-11 Thread Miron Cuperman
I am able to reproduce this consistently on maverick.  xorg virtual
memory increases by 8MB every time I change the desktop background.
xrestop is stable.

Running the intel driver, compiz, nautilus.

Linux mimiv 2.6.35-23-generic #41-Ubuntu SMP Wed Nov 24 10:18:49 UTC
2010 i686 GNU/Linux

ii  xserver-xorg-video-intel   2:2.12.0-1ubuntu5.1
ii  xorg   1:7.5+6ubuntu3   
  X.Org X Window System
ii  xserver-xorg   1:7.5+6ubuntu3   
  the X.Org X server
ii  xserver-xorg-core  2:1.9.0-0ubuntu7 
  Xorg X server - core server

Let me know what other information I can provide.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783

Title:
  MASTER: memory leak

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2010-12-11 Thread Miron Cuperman
This seems related to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-
xorg-video-intel/+bug/658746 .

  cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects | grep 'object bytes'

increases with each desktop background swap.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783

Title:
  MASTER: memory leak

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2010-09-15 Thread Jaroslav Petráš
uptime:
07:11:31 up 6 days,  7:42,  1 user,  load average: 0.47, 0.73, 0.77

/usr/bin/X -nolisten tcp :0 -dpi 110  -auth /tmp/...
RES: 959M

And it will increase memory usage hour by hour, day by day...

Some infos about packages:

ii  xserver-xorg 1:7.5+6+xserver1.9 
the X.Org X server
ii  xserver-xorg-core
2:1.9.0+git20100902+server-1.9-branch.79ee78de-0ubuntu0sarvatt Xorg X server - 
core server
ii  xserver-xorg-input-all   1:7.5+7
the X.Org X server -- input driver 
metapackage
ii  xserver-xorg-input-evdev 
1:2.5.0+git20100822.990540fa-0ubuntu0sarvatt   X.Org X server 
-- evdev input driver
ii  xserver-xorg-input-mouse 
1:1.5.0+git20100812.374725ef-0ubuntu0sarvatt   X.Org X server 
-- mouse input driver
ii  xserver-xorg-input-synaptics 
1:1.2.99+git20100610.a489ec15-0ubuntu0sarvatt2 Synaptics 
TouchPad driver for X.Org server
ii  xserver-xorg-input-vmmouse   
1:12.6.10+git20100811.adc177e3-0ubuntu0sarvatt X.Org X server 
-- VMMouse input driver to use with VMWare
ii  xserver-xorg-input-wacom 
1:0.10.7+git20100706-0ubuntu0sarvatt   X.Org X server 
-- Wacom input driver
ii  xserver-xorg-video-radeon
1:6.13.99+git20100907.b90cb61c-0ubuntu0sarvatt X.Org X server 
-- AMD/ATI Radeon display driver


I have this issue about two years on every laptop (or PC) I had (no matters 
which GPU/driver I used, or which version of X I ran [stable or devel]). 
Workaround is restart X server after 3-5 days of use (really annoying).

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2010-08-19 Thread Tommy_CZ
700MB

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2010-08-19 Thread Francisco
Tommy, please, be serious, only report new records of memory usage.
Your 700MB is nothing compared to what other people have, on the order of 1-2GB.
;-)

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2010-07-13 Thread Tommy_CZ
OK thanks for help.

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2010-06-23 Thread Tommy_CZ
Jesus how can it be a wishlist?? It is a memory LEAK, wht can be worse?
The impossibility to running the OS?

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2010-06-22 Thread Tommy_CZ
Confirmed, Kubuntu Lucid x64, xorg takes up to 500MB, and cca 50% of CPU
after e.g. day of using.

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2010-04-25 Thread Pawel
I am using Lucid, Radeon Open Source driver, KDE and I have compositions
enabled. Xorg's memory usage is very high in Kubuntu compared to Arch
Linux - sometimes over 100MB to 30MB in Arch.

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2010-03-09 Thread Haggai Eran
Hi,

I've tried lucid a couple of days and Xorg is using about 240-270MB
virtual memory (120-140MB resident), which is much better than the 1.5GB
it used on karmic, but I'm not sure if the bug is fixed, or whether I
just need to run it a while longer.

I tried running okular with the pdf files mentioned above. It does
increase Xorg's memory usage by about 100MB, but it is accounted for in
xrestop, and released after okular is closed.

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2010-03-05 Thread Philipp Edelmann
I used to have similar issues with Xorg using up 300-400 MB after a
couple of hours usage. Now that I've upgraded to lucid and KMS (radeon
driver), Xorg stays at about 60 MB.

Is this problem solved for anybody else with lucid?

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2010-02-14 Thread Shahar Or
Dear Aaditya,

This is what it looks like:

top - 17:19:52 up  9:54,  3 users,  load average: 0.49, 0.43, 0.56
Tasks: 172 total,   3 running, 169 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
Cpu(s): 30.9%us, 41.9%sy,  0.0%ni, 27.2%id,  0.0%wa,  0.0%hi,  0.0%si,  0.0%st
Mem:   1026432k total,   955660k used,70772k free,23548k buffers
Swap:   481940k total,   346816k used,   135124k free,   222696k cached

  PID USER  PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+  COMMAND
   
 1398 root  20   0 1176m 252m 6640 R 38.1 25.2  28:14.74 Xorg   

 4516 dawn  20   0  360m  60m  29m S  0.0  6.0   0:28.35 chrome 

 4705 dawn  20   0  123m  50m  12m S  0.0  5.0   0:05.80 chrome 

 2079 dawn  20   0  187m  25m  12m S  0.0  2.5   0:50.18 nautilus   

30699 dawn  20   0  166m  22m  14m S  0.0  2.2   0:08.96 empathy

 4636 dawn  20   0  107m  22m  11m S  0.0  2.2   0:01.37 chrome 

 4513 dawn  20   0  117m  21m  17m S 27.8  2.1   0:43.84 gnome-system-mo

 4548 dawn  20   0  106m  20m  11m S  0.0  2.0   0:02.59 chrome 

 2072 dawn  20   0  156m  16m 8208 S  0.0  1.7   1:29.02 gnome-panel

 4617 dawn  20   0  117m  16m   9m S  1.3  1.6   0:00.68 chrome 

 4596 dawn  20   0  100m  15m 9952 S  0.0  1.5   0:00.50 chrome 

 4654 dawn  20   0  100m  14m 9268 S  1.3  1.5   0:00.60 chrome 

 4642 dawn  20   0 99.4m  13m 9828 S  0.0  1.4   0:00.35 chrome 

 4601 dawn  20   0  100m  13m 9424 S  0.0  1.4   0:00.45 chrome 

 4646 dawn  20   0 99.8m  13m 8664 S  0.0  1.4   0:00.44 chrome 

28154 dawn  20   0  121m  13m  10m S  1.0  1.3   0:15.08 gnome-terminal 

 4613 dawn  20   0  100m  13m 8780 S  0.0  1.3   0:00.36 chrome 

30864 dawn  20   0 18104  12m 3188 S  0.0  1.2   0:03.40 telepathy-butte

 4560 dawn  20   0 99.2m  12m 7976 S  0.0  1.2   0:00.24 chrome 

 4663 dawn  20   0 99.1m  11m 7848 S  0.0  1.2   0:00.19 chrome

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2010-02-14 Thread Aaditya
@Shahar
It's clearly a memory leak in Xorg since that's taking up 25% of your 1GB, that 
is, around 250MB.

I'd advise you to discuss the issue on IRC [1] in #ubuntu-bugs . They
can help you pull more information from your system so that you can post
it here for developers' attention.

[1] https://help.ubuntu.com/community/InternetRelayChat

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2010-02-14 Thread Daniel Caleb
Just adding my two cents to the party...

I've also been noticing excessive RAM usage in Xorg, having spent
several weeks dealing with it - I've narrowed it down to the wallpaper-
tray app I was running, also happens with Drapes (i.e. - when the wall
paper changes frequently). Since having settled on a wallpaper, Xorg
looks like such:

1673 root  20   0  160m  65m  21m R   10  1.7  13:30.42 Xorg

As compared to having it eat as much as 1GB of ram after several hours
of usage.

I'm running Ubuntu 9.10 64bit, Nvidia 9800GTm with the proprietary
195.36 Beta drivers (also tested on the Official Nvidia drivers 190.53
with the same result). Tested with both stock Xorg packages and Xorg
from x-swat repo (currently in use):

dpkg -l |grep xorg: 
xorg 1:7.4+3ubuntu10
xserver-xorg  1:7.4+3ubuntu10
xserver-xorg-core   2:1.6.4-2ubuntu4

Please let me know if you need anything else... This issue is easily 
reproducible for me. 
Daniel

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2010-02-12 Thread Shahar Or
So I've one of these memory leaks. How do I figure out which app does
it?

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2010-02-12 Thread Aaditya
@Shahar Could you run `top` in a terminal and sort the output by memory
usage by hitting F n enter, and then take a look at the %MEM column?

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2010-01-16 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress = Incomplete

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2010-01-15 Thread Bill
I'm seeing a very large X process.

I have an ATI x1600 (ATI Technologies Inc M56GL [Mobility FireGL
V5200]) on a Thinkpad t60p (2007-AD1).

X typicaly uses right around 1GB of virtual memory - but xrestop shows a
/total/ of 120MB in pixmaps in 61 clients - compiz has about 22MB, as
does Firefox 3.0.17.

X info:

X.Org X Server 1.6.0
Release Date: 2009-2-25
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.24-23-server i686 Ubuntu
Current Operating System: Linux chubby 2.6.28-17-generic #58-Ubuntu SMP Tue Dec 
1 18:57:07 UTC 2009 i686
Build Date: 09 April 2009  02:10:02AM
xorg-server 2:1.6.0-0ubuntu14 (bui...@rothera.buildd) 

Here is pmap output from /usr/bin/X only showing those entries larger
than 1024KB - anon is only 33% of the total on my system:

Address   Kbytes RSSAnon  Locked Mode   Mapping
080470001656   -   -   - r-x--  Xorg (deleted)
09e88000  104908   -   -   - rw---[ anon ]
419fe0001260   -   -   - r-x--  libcrypto.so.0.9.8 (deleted)
4710a0001392   -   -   - r-x--  libc-2.9.so
7eb99000   12096   -   -   - rw---[ anon ]
8093   13692   -   -   - rw---[ anon ]
8168f000   16384   -   -   - r--s-[ shmid=0x2b6801f ]
82818000   27720   -   -   - rw---[ anon ]
8433e000   12800   -   -   - rw---[ anon ]
85171000   13224   -   -   - rw---[ anon ]
85e6d000   11904   -   -   - rw---[ anon ]
86db6000   12044   -   -   - rw---[ anon ]
87e320006544   -   -   - rw---[ anon ]
884a30008316   -   -   - rw---[ anon ]
89871000   15144   -   -   - rw---[ anon ]
8a8870005432   -   -   - rw---[ anon ]
8af7a0001300   -   -   - rw---[ anon ]
8b89f0009032   -   -   - rw---[ anon ]
8c662144   -   -   - rw---[ anon ]
8c8d80005572   -   -   - rw---[ anon ]
8cf4d0005572   -   -   - rw---[ anon ]
8dd5b0006612   -   -   - rw---[ anon ]
8ea9   14740   -   -   - rw---[ anon ]
8fa070001060   -   -   - rw---[ anon ]
902040006612   -   -   - rw---[ anon ]
90a3b0001060   -   -   - rw---[ anon ]
90e44000   30708   -   -   - rw---[ anon ]
92eaa0001556   -   -   - rw---[ anon ]
936f10001544   -   -   - rw---[ anon ]
939640001284   -   -   - rw---[ anon ]
93b68000   29184   -   -   - rw-s-  card0
957e80002048   -   -   - rw-s-  card0
959fb000  262112   -   -   - rw-s-  card0
a59f30002192   -   -   - r-x--  r300_dri.so
a5c380002048   -   -   - rw-s-  card0
a5e38000   29184   -   -   - rw-s-  card0
a7ab80002048   -   -   - rw-s-  card0
a7cb8000  262144   -   -   - rw-s-  resource0_wc
b7d570001028   -   -   - rw-s-  card0
total kB  972476   -   -   -

Hope this helps. Please let me know what else I can do.  I'd love to
have X run in just 300MB at this point (though, yes, 50MB would be oh-
so-nice).

Many, many thanks to anyone who can help.

/Bill

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2010-01-15 Thread Bill
I only found this bug tonight - I don't want to seem impatient for a
response :-) but I dug a bit deeper, and tried a series of different
settings in xorg.conf.  My ATI card (too old now for fglrx) using the
radeon driver does offer some configuration options.

I ultimately decided that --- with my 256MB RAM video card, and with X
duplicating that size in virtual memory /twice/ --- that I'd try this
Device-section  setting:

VideoRam128000

Now, /usr/bin/X starts up and uses about 400MB (at login prompt).  When
you login, it jumps to a bit over 500MB (running Compiz here)  - that's
300 MB less than usual.

I've tried 3d accelerated games on this laptop like the wonderful
Penumbra trilogy) and they just don't cut it - so as long as I can
function day-to-day in Compiz with my 'heavyweight' business/development
apps, I'm ok this way.

I'd like to understand why 2x the card RAM size needs to be allocated,
though :-/Once my machine starts swapping, it gets ugly fairly
quickly.

Maybe this will help someone - and I'll still be watching for some
solution to this issue.This is NOT windows, after all. :-)

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2009-12-19 Thread ChrT
Confirming Xorg uses over 1GB of ram on karmic 64bit, with nvidia
drivers 190.

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2009-12-17 Thread Haggai Eran
I can also confirm this that on Ubuntu Karmic AMD64, with nvidia
drivers, Xorg uses a lot of memory (about 1.5GB).

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2009-11-29 Thread Peter Cordes
confirmed on Ubuntu Karmic AMD64, with fglrx from Catalyst 9.11.  1GB
HD4670 desktop card.  Okular makes server memory consumption go up, but
it doesn't go down even after exitting everything.

This has been discussed on the xorg list.
http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/2008-December/041324.html

http://www.phoronix.com/forums/showthread.php?t=19637

reported to ATI as http://ati.cchtml.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1703, but it's
probably not driver-specific.


** Bug watch added: ATi Linux Platform Bugs #1703
   http://ati.cchtml.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1703

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2009-10-26 Thread Mohammad Derakhshani
After using my pc for a while almost always Xorg's memory grows to 1GB
or more. I haven't read all the posts here. But in case you need any
more info you may need in fixing this bug, please let me know.

uname -a
Linux scspc259.cs 2.6.28-16-generic #55-Ubuntu SMP Tue Oct 20 19:48:32 UTC 2009 
x86_64 GNU/Linux

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2009-06-20 Thread Aaditya
Xorg's memory consumption goes up each time the tty is switched to or
from the one running the X server, and each time the box is suspended 
resumed. The increase at each step depends on the 'pixmem' size.

In the following, I switched between tty1 (CLI) and tty7 (X) and took a reading 
each time I returned to tty7. Only `firefox` and `gnome-terminal` windows were 
open.
 
$ top -bn1 |grep Xorg
 2816 root  20   0  556m  63m  17m S2  1.6   0:06.87 Xorg   

$ top -bn1 |grep Xorg
 2816 root  20   0  606m  79m  20m S0  2.1   0:08.54 Xorg   

$ top -bn1 |grep Xorg
 2816 root  20   0  653m  92m  23m S2  2.4   0:10.30 Xorg   

$ top -bn1 |grep Xorg
 2816 root  20   0  701m 106m  25m S0  2.7   0:12.19 Xorg   

$ top -bn1 |grep Xorg
 2816 root  20   0  750m 117m  27m S0  3.0   0:13.95 Xorg   

$ top -bn1 |grep Xorg
 2816 root  20   0  798m 130m  30m S2  3.4   0:15.74 Xorg   

$ top -bn1 |grep Xorg
 2816 root  20   0  845m 144m  32m S0  3.7   0:17.52 Xorg   

$ top -bn1 |grep Xorg
 2816 root  20   0  893m 157m  35m S0  4.1   0:20.08 Xorg   

$ top -bn1 |grep Xorg
 2816 root  20   0  960m 210m  44m S2  5.4   1:01.58 Xorg   

$ top -bn1 |grep Xorg
 2816 root  20   0 1007m 229m  46m R   70  5.9   1:08.70 Xorg   

$ top -bn1 |grep Xorg
 2816 root  20   0 1052m 242m  49m S   74  6.2   1:17.90 Xorg   

$ top -bn1 |grep Xorg
 2816 root  20   0 1101m 257m  51m R   71  6.6   1:23.54 Xorg 

In the following, there was one suspend  resume between any two
consecutive commands. Again, only `firefox` and `gnome-terminal` windows
were open.

$ top -bn1 |grep Xorg
23595 root  20   0  526m 103m  24m S4  2.7   3:59.37 Xorg   

$ top -bn1 |grep Xorg
23595 root  20   0  587m 123m  24m S6  3.2   4:03.11 Xorg   

$ top -bn1 |grep Xorg
23595 root  20   0  675m 145m  25m S4  3.8   4:11.56 Xorg   

$ top -bn1 |grep Xorg
23595 root  20   0  723m 160m  26m S4  4.1   4:23.90 Xorg

`xrestop`'s output showed no significant change, but the increases in Xorg's 
resident memory in each step approximately equal to the total memory according 
to `xrestop`:
  Pixmaps:   17925K total, Other: 122K total, All:   18047K total

The box is running Jaunty, amd64; all packages are up to date.
$ lspci |grep Display
00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated 
Graphics Controller (rev 03)
$ cat /proc/version
Linux version 2.6.28-11-generic (bui...@crested) (gcc version 4.3.3 (Ubuntu 
4.3.3-5ubuntu4) ) #42-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 17 01:58:03 UTC 2009

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2009-05-24 Thread whitis
X server resident memory usage went back up to 500MB and stayed that way even 
after I killed all GUI programs except the terminal and panel applets.   Logged 
out and back in to restart X server.  Usage went down to 200MB virtual and 69MB 
resident. Reloading firefox, and all my tabs, did not affect X server 
memory usage.  Reading a document:
ftp://ftp.ams.org/pub/tex/doc/amsfonts/amsfndoc.pdf
(font heavy, since it describes a font) using okular caused X server resident 
memory to jump up to 200MB and virtual memory to increase by about the same 
amount. However, this memory was freed when I exited okular. Using 
evince to read the same document did not cause any increase in X server usage.  
 xrestop is still reporting 17MB of usage.
  PID USER  PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+  COMMAND 
28137 root  20   0  200m  66m  15m S  0.3  6.7   0:53.35 Xorg

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2009-05-24 Thread whitis
Couple more remarks.
I am using twinview on two 1600x1200 monitors.
Shitwave flush is not installed.   Well, actually it may be as it shows up on 
about:plugins but swfdec gets first dibs and it doesn't play flash without 
permission.   And it doesn't get that very often.   Particularly since it 
doesn't work on most sites, anyway.
Running glxgears doesn't seem to change X server memory usage.   So loading the 
GL driver doesn't seem to be a problem.

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2009-05-24 Thread whitis
After skimming through this 1300 page document with okular:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2008/n2798.pdf
Memory usage went up and it did not go back down:

  PID USER  PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+  COMMAND
28137 root  20   0  379m 240m  14m S  0.3 24.4   3:22.85 Xorg  

I paged down through several hundred pages, some fast enough for the
pages to be fully rendered, others not.   Memory use went up early and
then seemed to stabilize.

Leading me to suspect that the bugs in okular are exciting the bugs in
X.

Someone else mentioned another document from this site and okular.
Perhaps certain document excite the bugs in okular.

This is a document I had been reading earlier.

I opened the document again, and a curious thing happened.Resident
memory went down while virtual memory went up.   The resident portion
then climbed back up again.   When I exited okular the second time, the
X server freed the memory.

Restarted okular again. It resumed at the page I was at when I exited the 
last time.Virtual memory used by the X server almost instantly doubled from 
200MB to 400MB, I think.   Went back down again to near its initial value, then 
climbed back up to 368MB/230MB as a paged down.Went back down to 200MB when 
I exited the program. Rinse, lather, repeat.   X virtual memory usage goes 
up to about 360MB when actively using okular on this document.Frequently 
goes down to normal when I exit.   Loaded n1256.pdf from the same website.  X 
Virtual memory climbed to 366MB.After page down about 40 pages, it suddenly 
dropped to around 200MB.   But then it climbed again to 366Mb.So, okular 
likes to use about 160MB of server memory when it is running.   
I then opened both documents simultaneously in two instances of okular.X 
virtual memory went up to about 379MB, then stayed there, even actively paging 
through both documents.So okular seems to share its memory allocation 
between instances (two separate processes).Exited both and the memory usage 
did not go back down much, it stayed at 342MB virtual/201MB resident.   
Reloaded both documents individually and memory didn't go back down.   Even 
after exiting the program again. But memory didn't go up much paging the 
documents, indicating that okular is still reusing the memory.   xrestop, 
incorrectly shows that okular is using about 40MB.

It seems like okular does some peculiar sharing of pixmap usage between
processes.And when more than one is running, it may get a little
confused about freeing it when it exits.

http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/WG14/www/docs/n1256.pdf
These documents are the C99 and C++ standards drafts.


So, looks like the problem is somewhat reproducible.

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2009-05-24 Thread whitis
This problem is reminiscent of similar problems with shmget().   You
could either create a private shared memory segment, in which case you
could only share it with subprocesses, or you created a public one.   If
you created a public one, it was not automatically deleted when your
process exited or when the last process sharing the segment exited.   At
least there, you could run a utility program to clean up.

Sure enough, the semantics of XShmCreatePixmap and XShmCreatePixmap look 
similar, but less documented regarding cleanup and with no utility.
http://www.xfree86.org/current/mit-shm.html
However, these shared memory segments are allocated using shmget().

I checked, and okular's Xshm does not show up in ipcs.

KSharedPixmaps exist only on the server, implying the server creates them, 
not the client.   And no shmget() would be expected to be used because 
applications share a common X server.
http://api.kde.org/2.2-api/classref/kdeui/KSharedPixmap.html
http://developer.kde.org/documentation/library/3.1-api/kdeui/html/ksharedpixmap_8cpp-source.html

It uses XInternAtom and  XConvertSelection
It appears to create a selection named KDESHPIXMAP:xx
xlsatoms doesn't show any such atom names.

OpenGL may have its own pixmap sharing mechanisms.

I still suspect this is a shared pixmap issue, though I haven't found
the specific shared pixmap mechanism in use.

I see this as the intersection of a number of bugs:
   - X or OpenGL failure to implement reference counting, close on last client 
exit semantics or incorrect implementation.
   - X or OpenGL failure to provide utilities to list and destroy orphaned 
shared pixmaps
   - xrestop failure to account for shared pixmaps
   - Okular - improper freeing of shared resources
   - X server/utils failure to identify application which created each retained 
resource.
Looks like yet another case of bugs compounded by other bugs.   If even one 
module had been implemented correctly, the problem either would not occur or 
there would at least be a workaround that would help you clean up the mess or 
identify the culpret.

I do think I have collected enough information that this can be
reproduced (with low but practical probability) and that it can be
escalated upstream to nvidia AND okular.   Even if the problem can't be
reproduced on a particular machine, it appears that it is related to
okular shared pixmap storage on the server and that can be analyzed.

Okular probably isn't the only app which has this problem, but it is one
that is known to have this problem.   And it is not just an Okular bug
since the X server allows applications to create messes that outlive the
application and doesn't provide a way for the user to identify the
application causing the problem and to clean up the mess.

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2009-05-24 Thread whitis
A few lines from strace may be of interest, though strace bombs out pretty 
early.
It suggests okular is using the MIT-SHM extension for something, though if that 
were the problem the memory would show up in ipcs and would show up as shared 
memory in top.   I think the problem is in server side allocated shared memory

strace okular /tmp/n2798.pdf 21 | egrep -i shm|pixmap | fgrep -v ENOENT
writev(7, [{b\0\4\0\7\0\0\0..., 8}, {MIT-SHM..., 7}, {\0..., 1}], 3) = 16
writev(7, [{b\0\4\0\7\0\0\0..., 8}, {MIT-SHM..., 7}, {\0..., 1}], 3) = 16
writev(16, [{b\0\4\0\7\0\0\4..., 8}, {MIT-SHM..., 7}, {\0..., 1}], 3) = 16
read(19, KDE PIXMAP CACHE DEUX\177\0\0\10\2\0\0\177r\26\0\0..., 4096) = 4096
read(19, KDE PIXMAP CACHE DEUX\177\0\0\10\2\0\0f\274\1\0R..., 4096) = 4096
read(19, KDE PIXMAP CACHE DEUX\177\0\0\10\2\0\0\177r\26\0\0..., 4096) = 4096
read(19, KDE PIXMAP CACHE DEUX\177\0\0\10\2\0\0f\274\1\0R..., 4096) = 4096
lstat(/usr/share/pixmaps, {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=32768, ...}) = 0
stat(/usr/share/pixmaps, {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=32768, ...}) = 0
read(19, KDE PIXMAP CACHE DEUX\177\0\0\10\2\0\0\177r\26\0\0..., 4096) = 4096
read(19, KDE PIXMAP CACHE DEUX\177\0\0\10\2\0\0f\274\1\0R..., 4096) = 4096
read(19, KDE PIXMAP CACHE DEUX\177\0\0\10\2\0\0\177r\26\0\0..., 4096) = 4096
read(19, KDE PIXMAP CACHE DEUX\177\0\0\10\2\0\0f\274\1\0R..., 4096) = 4096
*** glibc detected *** strace: malloc(): memory corruption (fast): 
0x00f6f610 ***
=== Backtrace: =
/lib/libc.so.6[0x7f3c20dc5cb8]
/lib/libc.so.6[0x7f3c20dc9351]
/lib/libc.so.6(__libc_malloc+0x98)[0x7f3c20dca828]
strace[0x4087d8]
strace[0x405c0e]
strace[0x404916]
/lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe6)[0x7f3c20d6c5a6]
strace[0x402119]

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2009-05-24 Thread whitis
Cross-reference:
This was added as a comment on a related okular bug:

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177213

** Bug watch added: KDE Bug Tracking System #177213
   http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177213

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2009-05-23 Thread whitis
The X server was eating around 500MB, almost half my system memory.   I
was able to reduce that by about half by killing and restarting firefox,
killing okular, killing oocalc, changing system - preferences -
appearance - no effects, killing compiz-decorator.

As to the theory that it isn't a memory leak but instead just X holding
pixmaps, I have some numbers that disagree.   Notice the huge
discrepancy between total memory reported by top and total memory
reported by xrestop.   Sure, I got rid of a lot of pixmaps by killing
some applications.   But the xserver is only able to account for 17MB of
258MB of usage.

 top:
  PID USER  PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+  COMMAND   
 4199 root  20   0 1231m 266m 8948 S  1.3 27.0 744:38.61 Xorg 

xrestop
xrestop - Display: :0.0
  Monitoring 54 clients. XErrors: 0
  Pixmaps:   18688K total, Other: 308K total, All:   18997K total

res-base Wins  GCs Fnts Pxms Misc   Pxm mem  Other   Total   PID Identifier
240   361  3611  318  223 5371K 23K   5395K 14185 Downloads
000 1020  154 5000K  5K   5005K   ?   unknown
460 00010 5000K  0B   5000K   ?   unknown
220 9   500   59   84 1944K  3K   1948K  5025 Do
440 240   60   85  695K  2K698K 15156 gnome-appearan
120   257   740   23  129  126K 10K137K  5000 Panel
78050   644   74   45   66K  7K 73K 26490 emacs
3e0   246   618   64  145   35K 18K 53K  9082 emacs
160 3   260   89 2076  356B 49K 49K  5113 gnome-screensa
600 3104   15   48K456B 48K  9103 knotify4
480 3104   15   48K456B 48K  5365 kded4
50029   2826 19159B 48K 48K 15162 metacity
520   117   566   57   95   35K 12K 47K 14664 emacs
38049   548   47   55   35K 11K 46K 27595 em...@cervante
6e0   100   656   52   65   35K 11K 46K 10473 emacs
54050   556   49   59   35K  9K 44K 18736 emacs

Since these results were printed, I have eliminated all GUI apps except
3*emacs, firefox, 2*gnome-terminal, and the basic panel applets
including workspace switcher, drive mounter,  stickynotes, clock, volume
control, network manager, and system monitor.   X is still using 1222MB
virtual and 261MB RES.


Other big memory hogs (not necessarily X memory) have been update-manager 
(90MB), beagle, and apt-get.

A number of the drivers and one of the fonts are reported to take up around 
28MB or 43MB of virtual memory.
/proc/4199/maps
0040-005c3000 r-xp  08:06 28286996   
/usr/bin/Xorg
007c3000-007c5000 r--p 001c3000 08:06 28286996   
/usr/bin/Xorg
007c5000-007d rw-p 001c5000 08:06 28286996   
/usr/bin/Xorg
007d-007e1000 rw-p 007d 00:00 0 
017a1000-3ff19000 rw-p 017a1000 00:00 0  [heap]
4012a000-4012c000 rwxp  00:0f 719
/dev/zero
7f376e40e000-7f376f2f6000 rw-p 7f376e40e000 00:00 0 
7f376f9f5000-7f37711ba000 rw-p 7f376f9f5000 00:00 0 
7f37731b-7f37739ee000 rw-p 7f37731b 00:00 0 
7f3773bef000-7f3773edd000 rw-p 7f3773bef000 00:00 0 
7f37749f7000-7f3775375000 rw-p 7f37749f7000 00:00 0 
7f3775a96000-7f3775d85000 rw-p 7f3775a96000 00:00 0 
7f3776211000-7f3776712000 rw-s e81bd000 00:0f 11091  
/dev/nvidia0
7f37782ab000-7f37787ac000 rw-s e6d1 00:0f 11091  
/dev/nvidia0
7f377c355000-7f377c3b5000 rw-s  00:09 1212437
/SYSV (deleted)
7f377c3b5000-7f377c415000 rw-s  00:09 1179668
/SYSV (deleted)
7f377ed9c000-7f377fc9d000 rw-s eeaf5000 00:0f 11091  
/dev/nvidia0
7f378014e000-7f3780531000 r--p  08:06 28442789   
/usr/share/fonts/truetype/unfonts/UnBatangBold.ttf
7f3780ff4000-7f3781054000 rw-s  00:09 1638428
/SYSV (deleted)
7f3781284000-7f37821c rw-s e000 00:0f 11091  
/dev/nvidia0
7f378229-7f37822f rw-s  00:09 2261026
/SYSV (deleted)
7f3782673000-7f37826d3000 rw-s  00:09 688142 
/SYSV (deleted)
7f37826d3000-7f3782733000 rw-s  00:09 524299 
/SYSV (deleted)
7f3782793000-7f37827f3000 rw-s  00:09 458761 
/SYSV (deleted)
7f37828fb000-7f378295b000 rw-s  00:09 393223 
/SYSV (deleted)
7f37829a1000-7f3782a01000 rw-s  00:09 360454 
/SYSV (deleted)
7f3782a23000-7f3782a83000 rw-s  00:09 327685 
/SYSV (deleted)

[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2009-04-08 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Won't Fix

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2009-04-08 Thread karlrt
why is it a wont fix?

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2009-04-08 Thread Bryce Harrington
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 05:32:08PM -, karlrt wrote:
 why is it a wont fix?

Because it's already filed against xorg-server.  It's redundant to file
it against xorg, too.

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2009-04-06 Thread dshrek
I just found a way to easily increase memory consumption for X.org. This
works at least on two machines, a desktop and a notebook, with intrepid
and KDE 4.2.2. Both machines have a NVidia card (Quatro NVS-290 and
GeForce Go 7400) and I tried it with both the nv and the newest nvidia
driver with the same result.

Open okular with a very big file. Now you can see memory usage of X rising just 
by scrolling through the document. After going through 200-300 pages X needs 
around 1GB of memory.
Sometimes the memory got released after closing okular but most of the time the 
amount of memory was just lost.

I have tried this with a big djvu and a different pdf file with the same
result. Using acroread for the pdf file, no increase in memory
consumption can be observed.

Hopefully this very annoying bug can be solved soon...

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2009-03-27 Thread karlrt
hm, i'm not so shure its flash.

I just ran suspendtests for jaunty amd64 on my t61 intel GM965/GL960
iwl4965, and in just a uptime of 1hour40, thats how top looks:

top - 11:33:47 up  1:39,  2 users,  load average: 0.12, 0.24, 4.16
Tasks: 141 total,   3 running, 138 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
Cpu(s):  7.5%us,  4.9%sy,  0.0%ni, 87.1%id,  0.0%wa,  0.5%hi,  0.0%si,  0.0%st
Mem:   2009004k total,  1556044k used,   452960k free,55956k buffers
Swap:  3903752k total,   388372k used,  3515380k free,   299620k cached

  PID USER  PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+  COMMAND
   
 2734 root  20   0 2361m 750m 105m R   17 38.2   4:31.65 Xorg   
   
 3492 karlrt20   0  632m 186m  19m S4  9.5   1:52.26 firefox
   
 3281 karlrt20   0  253m  16m 6908 S1  0.8   0:17.06 compiz.real 

38 % of my 2GB memory. I only have firefox open, and didnt use flash the
whole uptime (just have been on launchpad pages with firefox)

So for me, it has nothing to do with proprietary drivers or software, i
only used OS to use my memory that much. I would really like to debug
this, but just dont know how i can help further?

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2009-02-10 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Low = Wishlist

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2009-01-29 Thread Michael Milligan
Another data point.  I'm having the same overall issue using the
radeonhd driver on my laptop, so there may or may not really be an issue
with leaks in the nvidia driver.  It sure seems to be related to firefox
and flash content as the memory usage of the xorg process ramps up when
I run firefox (1.5.x thru 3.0.5) and ramps up exponentially faster for
pages that have flash content.  Killing/quiting firefox frees up a lot
of memory, but not from Xorg's overall total.  It has behaved like this
(for me) for the past couple of years.  Only reason it's not a big deal
for me is I'm constantly having suspend/resume issues since the 7.10
release, so uptime never exceeds a couple of weeks anymore.  :(

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2009-01-29 Thread rfehren
 Michael == Michael Milligan mi...@acmeps.com writes:

Michael Another data point.  I'm having the same overall issue
Michael using the radeonhd driver on my laptop, so there may or
Michael may not really be an issue with leaks in the nvidia
Michael driver.  It sure seems to be related to firefox and flash
Michael content as the memory usage of the xorg process ramps up
Michael when I run firefox (1.5.x thru 3.0.5) and ramps up
Michael exponentially faster for pages that have flash content.
Michael Killing/quiting firefox frees up a lot of memory, but not
Michael from Xorg's overall total.  It has behaved like this (for
Michael me) for the past couple of years.  Only reason it's not a
Michael big deal for me is I'm constantly having suspend/resume
Michael issues since the 7.10 release, so uptime never exceeds a
Michael couple of weeks anymore.  :(

Hmm, thinking about this makes it pretty clear to me know. It really
must be firefox + flash. My firefox on x86 recently also acquired
about 1.5GB of RAM with the X server running at more than 2GB. Killing
the firefox instance also released quite a lot of RAM from the X
server. But more importantly: As reported earlier, I don't have the
problem on my amd64 desktop at work. And guess what! I don't have a
flash plugin running for my firefox there.

So please debugger folks. Test along these lines, and I am almost
certain you will find the real cause of this.

Roland

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2009-01-23 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: xorg = xorg-server
   Status: Confirmed = In Progress

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2009-01-18 Thread Pete
I have the same problem on my laptop running 8.10 which has a standard
intel graphics card, and have had this problem ever since 7.04 (didn't
use ubuntu before then).

Like Francisco, my Xrestop also looks fairly 'normal', and closing
firefox doesn't change more than at most a couple of meg of ram.

Its a pretty annoying bug because it forces me to restart ubuntu every
day, or wave goodbye to a couple hundred meg of ram.

Anything I can do to mitigate the problem / any command to run that can
aid in debugging the problem?

Cheers, and keep up the good work, really enjoying my switch to ubuntu
so far! :-)

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2009-01-18 Thread Francisco
Well, that rules out nVidia binaries as a source of the problem, at least
Pete's problem.

On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Pete sandersen.pe...@gmail.com wrote:

 I have the same problem on my laptop running 8.10 which has a standard
 intel graphics card, and have had this problem ever since 7.04 (didn't
 use ubuntu before then).

 Like Francisco, my Xrestop also looks fairly 'normal', and closing
 firefox doesn't change more than at most a couple of meg of ram.

 Its a pretty annoying bug because it forces me to restart ubuntu every
 day, or wave goodbye to a couple hundred meg of ram.

 Anything I can do to mitigate the problem / any command to run that can
 aid in debugging the problem?

 Cheers, and keep up the good work, really enjoying my switch to ubuntu
 so far! :-)

 --
 MASTER: memory leak
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.


-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2009-01-18 Thread Ittay Dror
while knowing very little about X, I think in general, it would be nice
if pixmaps were associated with the process that requested them (maybe
by just having the process associate a constant label with the pixmaps
it uses). then it would be possible to write a utility named pixmaptop
and also to cleanup pixmaps (even if not automatically, at least
manually), and also to have something like sar to show usage trends
(memory leaks)

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2009-01-13 Thread rfehren
 Bryce == Bryce Harrington br...@bryceharrington.org writes:

Bryce Comment #11 is a good summary of the situation.  Currently,
Bryce none of the comments on this bug provide sufficient
Bryce information to do troubleshooting.  Memory usage problems
Bryce tend to be very hard to debug, especially when they cannot
Bryce be reproduced independently.

Sure, I'm aware of that.

Bryce For people using the -nvidia driver, you're almost entirely
Bryce out of luck - the binary proprietary -nvidia driver
Bryce replaces pretty large swaths of the xserver's internals
Bryce with its own code, so debugging issues with that driver are
Bryce almost always futile.  If the bug is sufficiently well
Bryce reported, it could be forwarded to -nvidia, but so far not
Bryce enough has been provided.

What additional information do you require?

Maybe nouveau will be an alternative in 9.04.

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2009-01-12 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: xorg
  
  People think it's X that is leaking memory, when in fact it is just
  including the total pixmem from all apps. Usually the biggest consumer
  is a www-browser like firefox (and especially with flashplugin-nonfree
  whch leaks pixmem) or a similar graphics intensive application.
  
  this bug is meant to gather all the reports currently open, and
  hopefully to prevent unnecessarily opened bugs in the future.
+ 
+ For further discussion, please see:
+ https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Troubleshooting/HighCPU

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2009-01-12 Thread Bryce Harrington
Comment #11 is a good summary of the situation.  Currently, none of the
comments on this bug provide sufficient information to do
troubleshooting.  Memory usage problems tend to be very hard to debug,
especially when they cannot be reproduced independently.

For people using the -nvidia driver, you're almost entirely out of luck
- the binary proprietary -nvidia driver replaces pretty large swaths of
the xserver's internals with its own code, so debugging issues with that
driver are almost always futile.  If the bug is sufficiently well
reported, it could be forwarded to -nvidia, but so far not enough has
been provided.

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2009-01-07 Thread rfehren
 Francisco == Francisco  franje...@gmail.com writes:

Francisco Actually you don't have to reboot, just restart the
Francisco X-server by quitting the session and hitting Alt-E in
Francisco kdm or gdm login screen. But yes, the bug is still
Francisco there. After switching to ubuntu (I just installed the
Francisco packages) I still get the same behaviour.

Sure I know. But loosing the X-Session on my workstation is just as
bad as a reboot.

Is anybody working on the problem? By the way: I don't have the issue
on my workstation at work. Here I am running a 64bit Kernel though
with a GeForce 7600 GS card.

Francisco -- MASTER: memory leak
Francisco https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783 You received this
Francisco bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of
Francisco the bug.

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2009-01-07 Thread Francisco
The problem is that the people that can work on the problem think that there
is no problem, since measuring memory use is not something easy, and any
badly written app (typically it was flashplayer, but I already tried
disabling it) can leak pixmem. So until somebody of us identify which is the
culprit, and it can be different for any of us, there's no way this is going
to be solved.

The fact is that now my X server is using ~300m and if I quit the session
(all X programs except gdm), it will still be using almost all that memory,
go figure.

Now, you say that with another graphics card you don't have the same
problem, maybe that is the root of all evil, are you using the same version
of the nvidia driver? Most reports have been with nVidia, and since some of
the reports are false positives it may well be a driver problem.

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2009-01-05 Thread rfehren
I really don't understand, how such a grave bug can go unfixed for such
a long time, and is even marked as low. I have this problem since at
least 4 versions of Ubuntu (kubuntu), and was hoping for a fix after
each upgrade. Unfortunately in vain.

My xorg currently uses up 
7142 root  20   0 1835m 1.3g 8416 S8 44.1 537:48.47 Xorg
after 8 days of uptime (that's 1,3Gig,  and it continues to grow until the 
machine becomes unusable because of swapping). Only solution: Reboot (WinXP 
sends his best regards).

xrestop shows:
xrestop - Display: :0
  Monitoring 39 clients. XErrors: 3
  Pixmaps:  141213K total, Other:1856K total, All:  143070K total

My graphics card has 128MB (GeForce FX 5200), and  I use Xinerama (2 monitors) 
with the nvidia driver.
ii  nvidia-glx-new 169.12+2.6.24.15-23.55   
   NVIDIA binary XFree86 4.x/X.Org 'new' driver
ii  nvidia-kernel-common   20051028+1ubuntu8
   NVIDIA binary kernel module common files

Otherwise I'm still running stock kubuntu 8.04.
2.6.24-23-generic #1 SMP Thu Nov 27 18:44:42 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux

I'd really appreciate, if some effort were put in fixing this painful
bug.

Cheers,

Roland

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2009-01-05 Thread Francisco
Actually you don't have to reboot, just restart the X-server by quitting
the session and hitting Alt-E in kdm or gdm login screen. But yes, the
bug is still there. After switching to ubuntu (I just installed the
packages) I still get the same behaviour.

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2008-12-02 Thread Francisco
Somebody please explain this output from top:
15744  20   0 1029m 345m  32m S   12 17.2  33:11.88 firefox
22617  20   0  395m 243m 6944 S   10 12.1  27:47.82 Xorg
24251  20   0  592m  89m  23m S6  4.5  13:38.97 plasma
28131  20   0  612m  81m  58m S0  4.1   0:02.50 soffice.bin
28215  20   0  503m  80m  33m S4  4.0   0:03.50 konqueror
20960  20   0  840m  80m  35m S2  4.0   4:31.19 amarok

and xrestop:
xrestop - Display: :0
  Monitoring 45 clients. XErrors: 0
  Pixmaps:   58122K total, Other: 177K total, All:   58300K total

After quitting firefox (i'm writing this from konqueror), top:
22617  20   0  394m 243m 6696 S3 12.1  27:57.58 Xorg
24251  20   0  592m  90m  23m S3  4.5  13:44.09 plasma
28131  20   0  612m  81m  58m S0  4.1   0:02.53 soffice.bin
28215  20   0  504m  80m  34m S0  4.0   0:07.18 konqueror
20960  20   0  840m  80m  35m S0  4.0   4:31.53 amarok

xrestop - Display: :0
  Monitoring 43 clients. XErrors: 0
  Pixmaps:   57079K total, Other: 146K total, All:   57225K total

Only 1MB got freed, Xorg is still eating up 243MB. BTW, my graphics card
has only 128 MB, so it cannot be that memory shown as used by Xorg is
actually memory from the graphics card.

Cheers!

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2008-12-02 Thread Francisco
BTW, I disabled compiz, fearing that it would be the cause, it turned
out that it wasn't.

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2008-11-05 Thread nyarnon
Yup confirming here on three terminals. Restarting XORG ctrl-alt-
backspace clears the memory and start the xorg clogging from new. Is a
pain. Usually it takes about 24 hours for the system to become so
unresponsive that I need to restart either the terminal or Xorg.

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2008-10-11 Thread simtris
I'm trying the intrepid ubuntu and this issue appear then.
In gusty I din't have any problems. Since I upgraded, I have a huge memory 
consumption by Xorg. And slowly it increases reatching sometimes 150Mo. 
If I disable compiz (and kill the serveur) then my Xorf  memory stay around to 
30Mo.

In both case firefox take too huge memory only with few tabs (120Mo with 3 tabs)
It's clearly visible. I want this problem solved so don't hesitate to ask me 
for more help.

lspci:
Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 0c)

aptitude show xorg
Paquet : xserver-xorg
État: installé
Automatiquement installé: non
Version : 1:7.4~2ubuntu6

aptitude show compiz
Paquet : compiz
État: installé
Automatiquement installé: non
Version : 1:0.7.8-0ubuntu1

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2008-09-23 Thread Ittay Dror
i have this issue. closing firefox, and other desktop apps does not
help. X remains 408MB (after starting at 80MB). almost all of this
memory is private (not shared libraries etc.). I've tried using
MOZ_DISABLE_IMAGE_OPTIMIZE, but it didn't seem to make a change.

xrestop does not show a lot of pixmap memory used (only 7.6MB total).

so x is taking a lot of memory, that isn't pixmaps memory

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2008-03-19 Thread Martin Tuzinsky
i am using ubuntu gutsy, intel driver. after compiz is switched off and
gdm restart performed, the situation is normal and stable.

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98783] Re: MASTER: memory leak

2007-10-03 Thread KerwinKhu
Using Kubuntu Gutsy on amd64, nvidia-glx-new package, 512MB RAM

It seems that firefox/flash is indeed the culprit. I've been trying to
track down the cause of unresponsiveness in my system for days. First I
figured it was Xgl, so I disabled it - but then the bug hit me again on
plain Xorg. Finally found this bug report. Closed firefox, found that it
left orphaned processes. Killed those off, now my system seems as
responsive as ever. I am using a 32-bit browser in a chroot environment,
if that helps.

-- 
MASTER: memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs