Re: [Bug 453579] Re: in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4

2010-08-20 Thread Mackenzie Morgan
It's not Transmission's fault. I'm a KDE user (so, I use KTorrent),
and I was affected back when this bug was filed (no problems since
though).

-- 
in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 
2.6.31-14.46 on ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453579
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 453579] Re: in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4

2010-01-28 Thread Øyvind Stegard
I've yet to see any feedback about the 2.6.31-18 kernel
(karmic-proposed) in this critical bug report, and I find that rather
strange. The proposed -18-kernel has been out for while now and I count
80+ ext4-fixes in the changelog, including a fix for a data corruption
scenario.

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/496816
http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.31.8 (upstream
stable release from which 2.6.31-18 has patches)
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed

-- 
in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 
2.6.31-14.46 on ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453579
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 453579] Re: in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4

2010-01-27 Thread Ryan C. Underwood

Why would the kernel update get corrupted unless the archive or any of
the files it contains are several hundred megabytes in size?

-- 
Ryan C. Underwood, neme...@icequake.net

-- 
in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 
2.6.31-14.46 on ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453579
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 453579] Re: in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4

2010-01-27 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 07:49:06PM -, TragicWarrior wrote:
 I believe the large file aspect of the bug is an incorrect
 characterization.  If you take a look at comment #184, you will see that
 I have reproduced the bug on much smaller files.

No, you have reproduced some *other* corruption problem that doesn't fit the
profile of the original bug report.  Please file a separate bug.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org

-- 
in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 
2.6.31-14.46 on ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453579
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 453579] Re: in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4

2010-01-27 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 08:29:43PM -, TragicWarrior wrote:

 Why not just re-characterize the bug to match the collected data?

Because the data is not related to the bug that was reported, and it's not
appropriate to hijack bug reports for unrelated issues.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org

-- 
in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 
2.6.31-14.46 on ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453579
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 453579] Re: in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4

2010-01-11 Thread Michael Lazarev
@Z149: try Applications-Accessories-Disk Usage Alanyzer, which
also can be run from command line as baobab. Push Scan Filesystem
button to see where the space goes to.

-- 
in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 
2.6.31-14.46 on ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453579
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 453579] Re: in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4

2009-12-24 Thread Jakob Unterwurzacher
Am 2009-12-24 01:17, schrieb Goffi:
 By the way, I made a cmp of the qtmoko files, I have 2 bytes which
 differ:

Excellent! Scott, could you also post a cmp -l of a corrupted vs a good 
file?


Now, let's have some binary... (Note that cmp -l output is octal)

% cmp -l qtmoko-debian-v15.jffs2.clean qtmoko-debian-v15.jffs2.old
16070033  64 164
16070039 257 255

064 = 00110100
164 = 01110100

257 = 1010
255 = 10101101


% cmp -l qtmoko-debian-v15.jffs2.clean qtmoko-debian-v15.jffs2.old2
12701898   0 100
12701904  47  45

000 = 
100 = 0100

047 = 00100111
045 = 00100101


You have single bit flips on the second and on the seventh bit.
This looks so much like broken memory it virtually has to be broken memory.

OTOH, if everybody sees the second and the seventh bit flip then 
probably ext4 is doing something very stupid. Again, please post your 
cmp -l results!

-- 
in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 
2.6.31-14.46 on ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453579
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 453579] Re: in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4

2009-12-23 Thread Ernst
Goffi, I think your problem is related to the network part. I have a bug
report about file corruption using samba:

File corruption after copying files via samba from Karmic to Karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491288

Maybe your problem is similar?

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 15:26, Goffi go...@goffi.org wrote:

 I forgot: fsck is OK, and my corrupted files come from network

 --
 in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with
 linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453579
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.


-- 
in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 
2.6.31-14.46 on ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453579
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 453579] Re: in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4

2009-12-23 Thread Michael Lazarev
@Goffi: so, all files in which you noticed corruption, come from
network? If not Samba, how do you actually get them? Rsync? Torrent? I
believe these details could help investigate the problem.

-- 
in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 
2.6.31-14.46 on ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453579
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 453579] Re: in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4

2009-12-23 Thread Michael Lazarev
I tried to reproduce this bug with australia.navit.bin.zip, but I
couldn't.

# I got the first copy with firefox, and the second with wget
 wget http://downloads.cloudmade.com/oceania/australia/australia.navit.bin.zip 
 -O ./australia.navit.bin2.zip
 diff -bq australia.navit.bin.zip australia.navit.bin2.zip
 md5sum australia.navit.bin*
77fe45bf71779e9263d45b7f31145bbb  australia.navit.bin2.zip
77fe45bf71779e9263d45b7f31145bbb  australia.navit.bin.zip

By the way, if you downloaded that file after 15 December 2009, md5sum
should be like above.

-- 
in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 
2.6.31-14.46 on ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453579
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 453579] Re: in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4

2009-12-12 Thread Ramon
i believe not...some recent updates must have corrected the problem. You
guys experiencing any corruption lately?

On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 7:41 AM, Desh Danz nicol...@libero.it wrote:

 I'd like to know it too.

 --
 in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with
 linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453579
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.

 Status in The Linux Kernel: New
 Status in Ubuntu Release Notes: Fix Released
 Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu: Triaged
 Status in “linux” source package in Karmic: Triaged

 Bug description:
 There are worrying reports of filesystem corruption on ext4 in karmic.
  Scott says:

 12:36  Keybuk this whole ext4 thing is worrying me
 12:36  Keybuk I just downloaded an iso image, md5sum didn't match
 12:36  Keybuk downloaded it into an ext3 partition, matched just fine
 12:59  Keybuk and I know mvo has seen bugs with corrupted .debs in
 /var/cache/apt/archives
 12:59  Keybuk which seems to imply its any file large enough to use lots
 of extents

 I'm opening this bug report so that this bug gets tracked  triaged for
 karmic.  If we're unable to isolate the issue, we should consider rolling
 back to ext3 as the default filesystem in the installer.

 ProblemType: Bug
 Architecture: amd64
 ArecordDevices:
   List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices 
  card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: AD198x Analog [AD198x Analog]
   Subdevices: 1/1
   Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
 AudioDevicesInUse:
  USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
  /dev/snd/controlC0:  vorlon 3350 F pulseaudio
 Card0.Amixer.info:
  Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xee24 irq 17'
   Mixer name   : 'Analog Devices AD1981'
   Components   : 'HDA:11d41981,17aa2025,00100200'
   Controls  : 20
   Simple ctrls  : 11
 Date: Fri Oct 16 16:01:26 2009
 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
 HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=f108133c-6b9d-4d28-9058-0b3a0c5549b4
 MachineType: LENOVO 6371CTO
 Package: linux-image-2.6.31-14-generic 2.6.31-14.46
 PccardctlIdent:
  Socket 0:
   no product info available
 PccardctlStatus:
  Socket 0:
   no card
 ProcCmdLine: root=/dev/mapper/hostname-root ro
 ProcEnviron:
  PATH=(custom, user)
  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
  SHELL=/bin/bash
 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-13.44-generic
 RelatedPackageVersions: linux-firmware 1.22
 SourcePackage: linux
 Uname: Linux 2.6.31-13-generic x86_64
 WpaSupplicantLog:

 dmi.bios.date: 12/27/2006
 dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
 dmi.bios.version: 7IET23WW (1.04 )
 dmi.board.name: 6371CTO
 dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
 dmi.board.version: Not Available
 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information
 dmi.chassis.type: 10
 dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
 dmi.chassis.version: Not Available
 dmi.modalias:
 dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvr7IET23WW(1.04):bd12/27/2006:svnLENOVO:pn6371CTO:pvrThinkPadT60:rvnLENOVO:rn6371CTO:rvrNotAvailable:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNotAvailable:
 dmi.product.name: 6371CTO
 dmi.product.version: ThinkPad T60
 dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO

 To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/453579/+subscribe



-- 
ÐÌĞ
--
http://www.everythinglegit.com
http://twitter.com/ram130
http://www.myspace.com/everythinglegit

-- 
in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 
2.6.31-14.46 on ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453579
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 453579] Re: in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4

2009-11-23 Thread Mackenzie Morgan
I have not installed those packages, and I really doubt Scott has either since 
I think he maintains them.

-- 
in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 
2.6.31-14.46 on ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453579
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 453579] Re: in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4

2009-11-18 Thread Ramon
i just installed karmic on a  1TB sataand my flash drive 16GB...lets see
how it goes! both EXT4..if it lets me down, then yall got sum serious
problems..

On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 1:13 AM, Nicky Gillette
nickygille...@gmail.comwrote:

 I meant that it happens with or without encryption on 9.10 in the
 comment above, if it was unclear.

 --
 in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with
 linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453579
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.

 Status in The Linux Kernel: New
 Status in Ubuntu Release Notes: Fix Released
 Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu: Triaged
 Status in “linux” source package in Karmic: Triaged

 Bug description:
 There are worrying reports of filesystem corruption on ext4 in karmic.
  Scott says:

 12:36  Keybuk this whole ext4 thing is worrying me
 12:36  Keybuk I just downloaded an iso image, md5sum didn't match
 12:36  Keybuk downloaded it into an ext3 partition, matched just fine
 12:59  Keybuk and I know mvo has seen bugs with corrupted .debs in
 /var/cache/apt/archives
 12:59  Keybuk which seems to imply its any file large enough to use lots
 of extents

 I'm opening this bug report so that this bug gets tracked  triaged for
 karmic.  If we're unable to isolate the issue, we should consider rolling
 back to ext3 as the default filesystem in the installer.

 ProblemType: Bug
 Architecture: amd64
 ArecordDevices:
   List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices 
  card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: AD198x Analog [AD198x Analog]
   Subdevices: 1/1
   Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
 AudioDevicesInUse:
  USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
  /dev/snd/controlC0:  vorlon 3350 F pulseaudio
 Card0.Amixer.info:
  Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xee24 irq 17'
   Mixer name   : 'Analog Devices AD1981'
   Components   : 'HDA:11d41981,17aa2025,00100200'
   Controls  : 20
   Simple ctrls  : 11
 Date: Fri Oct 16 16:01:26 2009
 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
 HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=f108133c-6b9d-4d28-9058-0b3a0c5549b4
 MachineType: LENOVO 6371CTO
 Package: linux-image-2.6.31-14-generic 2.6.31-14.46
 PccardctlIdent:
  Socket 0:
   no product info available
 PccardctlStatus:
  Socket 0:
   no card
 ProcCmdLine: root=/dev/mapper/hostname-root ro
 ProcEnviron:
  PATH=(custom, user)
  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
  SHELL=/bin/bash
 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-13.44-generic
 RelatedPackageVersions: linux-firmware 1.22
 SourcePackage: linux
 Uname: Linux 2.6.31-13-generic x86_64
 WpaSupplicantLog:

 dmi.bios.date: 12/27/2006
 dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
 dmi.bios.version: 7IET23WW (1.04 )
 dmi.board.name: 6371CTO
 dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
 dmi.board.version: Not Available
 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information
 dmi.chassis.type: 10
 dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
 dmi.chassis.version: Not Available
 dmi.modalias:
 dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvr7IET23WW(1.04):bd12/27/2006:svnLENOVO:pn6371CTO:pvrThinkPadT60:rvnLENOVO:rn6371CTO:rvrNotAvailable:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNotAvailable:
 dmi.product.name: 6371CTO
 dmi.product.version: ThinkPad T60
 dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO



-- 
ÐÌĞ
--
http://www.goeazy.com
http://twitter.com/ram130
http://www.myspace.com/everythinglegit

-- 
in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 
2.6.31-14.46 on ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453579
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 453579] Re: in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4

2009-11-18 Thread Ramon
and yes i am doing large transfers of files over 16GBhow do you check
the checksums?

On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 2:50 AM, Ram'on McNally ram...@gmail.com
wrote:

 i just installed karmic on a  1TB sataand my flash drive 16GB...lets
 see how it goes! both EXT4..if it lets me down, then yall got sum serious
 problems..


 On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 1:13 AM, Nicky Gillette 
 nickygille...@gmail.comwrote:

 I meant that it happens with or without encryption on 9.10 in the
 comment above, if it was unclear.

 --
 in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with
 linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453579
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.

 Status in The Linux Kernel: New
 Status in Ubuntu Release Notes: Fix Released
 Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu: Triaged
 Status in “linux” source package in Karmic: Triaged

 Bug description:
 There are worrying reports of filesystem corruption on ext4 in karmic.
  Scott says:

 12:36  Keybuk this whole ext4 thing is worrying me
 12:36  Keybuk I just downloaded an iso image, md5sum didn't match
 12:36  Keybuk downloaded it into an ext3 partition, matched just fine
 12:59  Keybuk and I know mvo has seen bugs with corrupted .debs in
 /var/cache/apt/archives
 12:59  Keybuk which seems to imply its any file large enough to use lots
 of extents

 I'm opening this bug report so that this bug gets tracked  triaged for
 karmic.  If we're unable to isolate the issue, we should consider rolling
 back to ext3 as the default filesystem in the installer.

 ProblemType: Bug
 Architecture: amd64
 ArecordDevices:
   List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices 
  card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: AD198x Analog [AD198x Analog]
   Subdevices: 1/1
   Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
 AudioDevicesInUse:
  USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
  /dev/snd/controlC0:  vorlon 3350 F pulseaudio
 Card0.Amixer.info:
  Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xee24 irq 17'
   Mixer name   : 'Analog Devices AD1981'
   Components   : 'HDA:11d41981,17aa2025,00100200'
   Controls  : 20
   Simple ctrls  : 11
 Date: Fri Oct 16 16:01:26 2009
 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
 HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=f108133c-6b9d-4d28-9058-0b3a0c5549b4
 MachineType: LENOVO 6371CTO
 Package: linux-image-2.6.31-14-generic 2.6.31-14.46
 PccardctlIdent:
  Socket 0:
   no product info available
 PccardctlStatus:
  Socket 0:
   no card
 ProcCmdLine: root=/dev/mapper/hostname-root ro
 ProcEnviron:
  PATH=(custom, user)
  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
  SHELL=/bin/bash
 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-13.44-generic
 RelatedPackageVersions: linux-firmware 1.22
 SourcePackage: linux
 Uname: Linux 2.6.31-13-generic x86_64
 WpaSupplicantLog:

 dmi.bios.date: 12/27/2006
 dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
 dmi.bios.version: 7IET23WW (1.04 )
 dmi.board.name: 6371CTO
 dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
 dmi.board.version: Not Available
 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information
 dmi.chassis.type: 10
 dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
 dmi.chassis.version: Not Available
 dmi.modalias:
 dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvr7IET23WW(1.04):bd12/27/2006:svnLENOVO:pn6371CTO:pvrThinkPadT60:rvnLENOVO:rn6371CTO:rvrNotAvailable:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNotAvailable:
 dmi.product.name: 6371CTO
 dmi.product.version: ThinkPad T60
 dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO




 --
 ÐÌĞ
 --
 http://www.goeazy.com
 http://twitter.com/ram130
 http://www.myspace.com/everythinglegit




-- 
ÐÌĞ
--
http://www.goeazy.com
http://twitter.com/ram130
http://www.myspace.com/everythinglegit

-- 
in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 
2.6.31-14.46 on ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453579
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 453579] Re: in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4

2009-11-12 Thread Ramon
That's what I had use to know I got a bad sector in the first place. I tried
runing the short test and the other one that wasn't extended. All failed
before they could complete bout 90%. Tried just awhile ago and it failed to
continue runing after 10sec, saying cannot read. I jus ran a memtest, its
clean. Windows 7 finally booted, but saying it cannot access my desktop and
a lot of errors now, sumting about read error and corrupted files. Its just
problem after problem. I guess everyone else here is better off than me
right now?

On Nov 12, 2009 3:20 AM, unggnu ung...@googlemail.com wrote:

The tool to check S.M.A.R.T in Karmic is called Disk Utility (gnome-
disk-utility) and it is also possible before with the smartmontools.

-- in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with
linux 2.6.31-14.46 on...

-- 
in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 
2.6.31-14.46 on ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453579
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 453579] Re: in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4

2009-11-11 Thread Ramon
Wow now that's a test!!!   I think karmic corrupted my windows7 and two data
partitions. I installed karmic on a brand new 21days old 500GB hard drive.
Been transfering files for 2 weeks from my failing 320GB. After that was
done I tried booting back into windows7, failed. Karmic crashes occasionally
for no reason!! Decided to run start up repair, no problems then I ran
chkdsk, all of corrupted files on each partition! ..to top it off disk
utility is reporting my hard drive now has a bad sector!! Sumone help me
before I go insane

On Nov 11, 2009 9:26 PM, Andrew M. 2bitoperati...@gmail.com wrote:

oh yes, one more thing,
all fs's were created  formatted by the Karmic installer, using the release
media

-- in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with
linux 2.6.31-14.46 on...

-- 
in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 
2.6.31-14.46 on ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453579
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 453579] Re: in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4

2009-11-11 Thread Mackenzie Morgan
Er...this is only for ext4. Win7 does not run on ext4.  Sounds like that bad 
sector is to blame.  Just because it's new doesn't mean it's not broken.

-- 
in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 
2.6.31-14.46 on ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453579
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 453579] Re: in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4

2009-11-11 Thread Ramon
I used Karmic to create the partitions, 2 NTFS, SWAP  an EXT4. The bad
sector didn't show up until I was doing copying files...so far it says One
bad sector. It just seems ironic this corruption problem is here then this
happens.

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 1:39 AM, Mackenzie Morgan maco...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Er...this is only for ext4. Win7 does not run on ext4.  Sounds like that
 bad
 sector is to blame.  Just because it's new doesn't mean it's not broken.

 --
 in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with
 linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453579
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.

 Status in The Linux Kernel: New
 Status in Ubuntu Release Notes: Fix Released
 Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu: Triaged
 Status in “linux” source package in Karmic: Triaged

 Bug description:
 There are worrying reports of filesystem corruption on ext4 in karmic.
  Scott says:

 12:36  Keybuk this whole ext4 thing is worrying me
 12:36  Keybuk I just downloaded an iso image, md5sum didn't match
 12:36  Keybuk downloaded it into an ext3 partition, matched just fine
 12:59  Keybuk and I know mvo has seen bugs with corrupted .debs in
 /var/cache/apt/archives
 12:59  Keybuk which seems to imply its any file large enough to use lots
 of extents

 I'm opening this bug report so that this bug gets tracked  triaged for
 karmic.  If we're unable to isolate the issue, we should consider rolling
 back to ext3 as the default filesystem in the installer.

 ProblemType: Bug
 Architecture: amd64
 ArecordDevices:
   List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices 
  card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: AD198x Analog [AD198x Analog]
   Subdevices: 1/1
   Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
 AudioDevicesInUse:
  USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
  /dev/snd/controlC0:  vorlon 3350 F pulseaudio
 Card0.Amixer.info:
  Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xee24 irq 17'
   Mixer name   : 'Analog Devices AD1981'
   Components   : 'HDA:11d41981,17aa2025,00100200'
   Controls  : 20
   Simple ctrls  : 11
 Date: Fri Oct 16 16:01:26 2009
 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
 HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=f108133c-6b9d-4d28-9058-0b3a0c5549b4
 MachineType: LENOVO 6371CTO
 Package: linux-image-2.6.31-14-generic 2.6.31-14.46
 PccardctlIdent:
  Socket 0:
   no product info available
 PccardctlStatus:
  Socket 0:
   no card
 ProcCmdLine: root=/dev/mapper/hostname-root ro
 ProcEnviron:
  PATH=(custom, user)
  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
  SHELL=/bin/bash
 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-13.44-generic
 RelatedPackageVersions: linux-firmware 1.22
 SourcePackage: linux
 Uname: Linux 2.6.31-13-generic x86_64
 WpaSupplicantLog:

 dmi.bios.date: 12/27/2006
 dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
 dmi.bios.version: 7IET23WW (1.04 )
 dmi.board.name: 6371CTO
 dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
 dmi.board.version: Not Available
 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information
 dmi.chassis.type: 10
 dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
 dmi.chassis.version: Not Available
 dmi.modalias:
 dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvr7IET23WW(1.04):bd12/27/2006:svnLENOVO:pn6371CTO:pvrThinkPadT60:rvnLENOVO:rn6371CTO:rvrNotAvailable:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNotAvailable:
 dmi.product.name: 6371CTO
 dmi.product.version: ThinkPad T60
 dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO



-- 
ÐÌĞ
--
http://www.goeazy.com
http://twitter.com/ram130
http://www.myspace.com/everythinglegit

-- 
in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 
2.6.31-14.46 on ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453579
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs