[Bug 205170] [NEW] please resync pokerth with the version in debian
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: pokerth I uploaded 0.6.1 to debian some days ago, please resync your package with Debian. The new packages split the data and server stuff in own packages, so saving some space on the mirrors and not installing too much on the users pc. Regards Evgeni Golov ** Affects: pokerth (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- please resync pokerth with the version in debian https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205170 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 189621] Re: v86d missing, needed for uvesafb
I've just filled http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=473176: ITP: v86d -- execute x86 BIOS code in a controlled environment Will try to get this into Debian asap, should follow to Ubuntu then ;) -- v86d missing, needed for uvesafb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189621 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 192179] Re: [Gutsy] hdapsd daemon FAIL, protect not exist
Did you read /usr/share/doc/hdapsd/README.Debian? If so, you would know, you need to patch the kernel. ** Changed in: hdapsd (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Evgeni Golov (sargentd) Status: New = Invalid -- [Gutsy] hdapsd daemon FAIL, protect not exist https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192179 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 139881] Re: hdaps_protect patch to enable disk head parking on thinkpads
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:12:16 - Noel J. Bergman wrote: Ubuntu is trying to deliver linux to a larger population of users. A typical problem throughout the Open Source world is recognizing and coping with a transition from a small population of computer-skilled participants able to dig for information to a larger unskilled population that expects everything to just work. No one outside of the cognoscenti is going to go digging under /usr/share/doc, unless explicitly told to look there. Hum, should we remove /u/s/doc then ;) Nor should most users look there, given the nature of the material generally present (changelogs, TODO files, copyright notices). At best, we'll train users to read man pages. In any event, don't worry about removing the package. If you add a hint to that file on startup, and to the package description, that should indicate to most users that the feature won't be present, and point the rare few (a tiny fraction of a percent) who can handle the patch to what they have to do. And we can hope that someday either the kernel support will be mainline, or the daemon won't need it. I think adding a hint to the init script only should be enough. IMHO hdaps is something advanced even when the kernel would have the UNLOAD support, as the vanilla kernel has many problems with newer hdaps chips (this is solved by tp-smapi (not in Ubuntu)) and thus hdapsd might not work correctly sometimes. However, I'm trying to get multidisk support for hdapsd and will then upload a version with a louder RTFM ;-) in the init script. Regards Evgeni -- hdaps_protect patch to enable disk head parking on thinkpads https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139881 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 139881] Re: hdaps_protect patch to enable disk head parking on thinkpads
not a bug in hdapsd, needs support in the kernel ** Changed in: hdapsd (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- hdaps_protect patch to enable disk head parking on thinkpads https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139881 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174447] Re: Cannot start hdapsd on Thinkpad T60
I assume you have read /usr/share/doc/hdapsd/README.Debian and patched your kernel accordingly? ** Changed in: hdapsd (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- Cannot start hdapsd on Thinkpad T60 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174447 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 148450] Re: strange startup script
Please read /usr/share/doc/hdapsd/README.Debian, your kernel needs a patch! ** Changed in: hdapsd (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Evgeni Golov (sargentd) Status: New = Invalid -- strange startup script https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148450 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154807] Re: hdapsd configuration only supports one disk; my machine has two...
Hi, two hdapsd instances should not be the way you want (but it should work though). Did you try giving hdapsd two -d options? If this does not work, I'll try to speak with upstream, maybe we will find an easy way to solve the issue without running hdapsd twice. Regards Evgeni -- hdapsd configuration only supports one disk; my machine has two... https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154807 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154807] Re: hdapsd configuration only supports one disk; my machine has two...
sent mail to upstream, will see how he thinks about that ** Changed in: hdapsd (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Evgeni Golov (sargentd) Status: New = Confirmed -- hdapsd configuration only supports one disk; my machine has two... https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154807 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 139881] Re: hdaps_protect patch to enable disk head parking on thinkpads
Well, exactly this hint is written in /usr/share/doc/hdapsd/README.Deabian, which should be the first place to read if some app does not work out of the box, but I could add a hint to that file on startup though. About removal: Uh, I didn't upload the package to Ubuntu, I don't know anything about removal from it either - can you give me a pointer here? -- hdaps_protect patch to enable disk head parking on thinkpads https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139881 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 74712] Re: Should not pop up error messages when there is no user action
Well, what is wrong with this: Configuration - Common Preferences - Details - Other - Don't popup error dialog on receive error -- Should not pop up error messages when there is no user action https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/74712 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 237561] [NEW] libboost-date-time-dev: Breaks compilation with g++-4.3
Public bug reported: The original bug in Debian was http://bugs.debian.org/468061 which was fixed in boost 1.34.1-9. Currently pokerth FTBFS because of that: g++ -c -pipe -O2 -Wall -W -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -DENABLE_IPV6 -DQT_NO_DEBUG -I/usr/share/qt4/mkspecs/linux-g++ -I. -I/usr/include/qt4 -I. -Isrc -Isrc/engine -Isrc/gui -Isrc/gui/qt -Isrc/gui/qt/qttools -Isrc/net -Isrc/engine/local_engine -Isrc/engine/network_engine -Isrc/config -Isrc/third_party/tinyxml -Isrc/third_party/libircclient/include -Isrc/core -Imocs -Iuics -o obj/game.o src/game.cpp In file included from /usr/include/boost/date_time/gregorian/gregorian_io.hpp:12, from /usr/include/boost/date_time/gregorian/conversion.hpp:23, from /usr/include/boost/date_time/gregorian/gregorian.hpp:21, from /usr/include/boost/date_time/posix_time/time_formatters.hpp:12, from /usr/include/boost/date_time/posix_time/posix_time.hpp:24, from src/third_party/boost/timers/portable/clock_device.hpp:18, from src/third_party/boost/timers/portable.hpp:15, from src/third_party/boost/timers.hpp:22, from src/game.h:30, from src/game.cpp:20: /usr/include/boost/date_time/date_facet.hpp:560: error: declaration of 'void boost::date_time::date_input_facetdate_type, CharT, InItrT::special_values_parser(boost::date_time::special_values_parserdate_type, charT)' /usr/include/boost/date_time/special_values_parser.hpp:34: error: changes meaning of 'special_values_parser' from 'class boost::date_time::special_values_parserdate_type, charT' make[2]: *** [obj/game.o] Error 1 (http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15016739/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-i386.pokerth_0.6.2-1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz) Can you please sync the fix from Debian, so packages using libboost- date-time-dev can be built again? TIA Evgeni ** Affects: boost (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- libboost-date-time-dev: Breaks compilation with g++-4.3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237561 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 234247] Re: On net game, other opponents don't appear on the list
Well, I filled a bug about that 2 month ago: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pokerth/+bug/205170 Noone replied, and noone cared. Now 0.6.2 is out, which should be in Debian this weekend (currently waiting for a review on mentors.debian.net). Maybe you want to bug Harald Sitter (https://launchpad.net/~apachelogger) directly, as he has uploaded the 0.6-0ubuntu1 version. Regards Evgeni Golov, Debian PokerTH maintainer -- On net game, other opponents don't appear on the list https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234247 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 189621] Re: v86d missing, needed for uvesafb
Hi, I was able to reproduce this error on one of my machines. It seems it *does* find v86d, as the error would have to more lines if it wouldn't: uvesafb: failed to execute /sbin/v86d uvesafb: make sure that the v86d helper is installed and executable uvesafb: Getting VBE info block failed (eax=0x4f00, err=-2) uvesafb: vbe_init() failed with -22 uvesafb: probe of uvesafb.0 failed with error -22 I still do not understand why it works on 2 machines, and on one not... Could you try moving the uvesafb line from /etc/initramfs-tools/modules to /etc/modules, run update-initramfs -u and reboot? That works for me on the one machine, however that means that uvesafb and v86d will be started a bit later (leaving you with an ugly console until then). Regards Evgeni PS: what graphiccard do you have? My working are an old Radeon 7000 and a VIA Chrome 9, the non-working is a Radeon X1400. -- v86d missing, needed for uvesafb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189621 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 251736] [NEW] please resync the latest changes with Debian
Public bug reported: Hi, yesterday I've uploaded v86d 0.1.5.2-1 to Debian. The package includes the Ubuntu initramfs changes and has some minor documentation improvements. It would be nice if you could sync it, so it could go to Intrepid. The only change you still need it the adding of uvesafb.h. Regards Evgeni ** Affects: v86d (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- please resync the latest changes with Debian https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251736 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 189621] Re: v86d missing, needed for uvesafb
Hi, On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 11:57:05 - Colin Watson wrote: I've synced v86d into Ubuntu. We still need to review it for main and probably get it into the minimal seed, or have the new kernel depend on it, or both. It failed to build because your linux-libc-dev does not have a /usr/include/video/uvesafb.h - whyever. And please please please, don't use v86d as default (so dont let the kernel depend on it). It should only be used when there is no better FB driver. Regards Evgeni -- v86d missing, needed for uvesafb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189621 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 189621] Re: v86d missing, needed for uvesafb
Hi, On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 02:14:53 - nullack wrote: Problem 1: From within Intrepid if I unload and reload the module like so: sudo modprobe -r uvesafb sudo modprobe uvesafb mode=1280x1024-32 It results in tty alignment being wrong (like its centre aligned not left) Why do you do this? If you want to change resolution, you can use fbset. And additionaly, 1280x1024 should be possible with standard vesafb using vga=793 (or 794 or 795). Problem 2: Trying to load video=uvesafb:1280x1024-32 wont run in the grub boot line results in nothing occuring and the default vga res being activated. Do you have uvesafb in your kernel (or at least in your initrd)? If not you'll need to add those options in /etc/modprobe.d/ and not on the GRUB command line. Regards Evgeni -- v86d missing, needed for uvesafb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189621 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 189621] Re: v86d missing, needed for uvesafb
Hi, On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 07:58:52 - Michael Sotnikov wrote: 1. with current interpid kernel (2.6.26-4) vesafb isn't possible - it's absent. It was replaced with uvesafb, which use another command (according to documents) In addition. After system load we can see that uvesafb was loaded (lsmod | grep uvesafb), but it doesn't work! Cause uvesafb should create some entries in /sys/class/graphics/fb0/ which is absent at this moment. And if you restart uvesafb - they will be created. So you have CONFIG_FB_UVESA=y CONFIG_FB_VESA=n in your kernel config? IMHO that's bad, as uvesafb should not be used as a complete replacement for vesafb, but only in cases where vesafb fails due to it's limitations. Can you post a `dmesg |grep -i uvesa` after a fresh boot with uvesafb not working correctly? I assume it just can't start v86d (as / is not yet mounted). This should be solved by including v86d into the initrd. 2.I think this is right way - add uvesafb to initrd, but we need it working first. It works fine as a module here for me, both with and without initrd. -- v86d missing, needed for uvesafb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189621 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 189621] Re: v86d missing, needed for uvesafb
hi, On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:26:24 - Michael Sotnikov wrote: I use default kernel (iterpid): $ uname -a Linux astar-laptop 2.6.26-4-generic #1 SMP Mon Jul 14 18:39:53 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux my config: $ cat /boot/config-2.6.26-4-generic | grep VESA CONFIG_FB_UVESA=m # CONFIG_FB_VESA is not set after clean start without any vga= or video=: $ dmesg |grep -i uvesa [2.422795] uvesafb: Getting VBE info block failed (eax=0x4f00, err=-3) [2.422795] uvesafb: vbe_init() failed with -22 [2.422795] uvesafb: probe of uvesafb.0 failed with error -22 does it mean that it can't find v86d on / ? Yes it looks like this. Do you have v86d 0.1.5-1ubuntu2? If so, it should have added itself to the initrd already... Can you look inside of it (gzip and cpio are your friends) and tell me that there is a v86d inside? can you help us to figure out how to put it to initrd? I think that forum is a much better than bugzilla: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=860719 I don't have an account there, and to be honest: I don't want to have one :) -- v86d missing, needed for uvesafb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189621 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 189621] Re: v86d missing, needed for uvesafb
Hi, On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:17:14 - Michael Sotnikov wrote: $ apt-cache policy v86d v86d: Установлен: 0.1.5-1ubuntu2 Кандидат: 0.1.5-1ubuntu2 Таблица версий: *** 0.1.5-1ubuntu2 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status with unpacked initrd: $ find . | grep vesa ./lib/modules/2.6.26-4-generic/initrd/uvesafb.ko $ find . | grep v86d ./sbin/v86d That looks strange... Well it looks right and it's strange that it does not work :P Where do you set uvesafb for use in initrd? I have the following line in my /etc/initramfs-tools/modules: uvesafb mode=1024x768 Which gives me a perfect 1024x768 framebuffer on boot. Maybe something in /usr/share/initramfs-tools/modules.d? Regards Evgeni, puzzled about that issue. -- v86d missing, needed for uvesafb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189621 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 237561] Re: libboost-date-time-dev: Breaks compilation with g++-4.3
** Changed in: boost (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- libboost-date-time-dev: Breaks compilation with g++-4.3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237561 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 300814] Re: please sync hdapsd 1:0.0.20081004-1 from Debian/experimental
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:24:41 - Jonas Pedersen wrote: Breaks: udev ( 136-1) Shouldn't that be Conflicts: udev (...)? For anything else: ACK from me. Regards -- Bruce Schneier Fact Number 372: Bruce Schneier is the Bombe -- please sync hdapsd 1:0.0.20081004-1 from Debian/experimental https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300814 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 366330] Re: [needs-packaging] ITP: New upstream version of hdapsd
needs-packaging? sorry what? Why you do something that is long done? Just sync 20090401 from Debian and be happy. No need to reinvent the wheel again. -- [needs-packaging] ITP: New upstream version of hdapsd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366330 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 299407] Re: After Intrepid PokerTH starts without any pictures (background, players etc.)
So you're on Intrepid, running PokerTH 0.6.2-2, right? And you have pokerth-data installed? (It should have been installed as a dependency of pokerth). The PokerTH binary is placed under /usr/games/pokerth, the data is in /usr/share/games/pokerth. Both, the .desktop and the .menu file point correctly to /usr/games/pokerth (if it's in your $PATH), so the problem should not occur. can you post the output of the following commands? echo $PATH ls /usr/share/pokerth dpkg -L pokerth dpkg -L pokerth-data dpkg -l pokerth dpkg -l pokerth-data cat /usr/share/applications/pokerth.desktop Regards Evgeni -- After Intrepid PokerTH starts without any pictures (background, players etc.) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299407 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 299407] Re: After Intrepid PokerTH starts without any pictures (background, players etc.)
Okay, that looks strange: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ echo $PATH /usr/local/sbin /usr/local/bin /usr/sbin /usr/bin /sbin /bin /usr/games /usr/X11R6/bin [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ ls /usr/share/pokerth data/ libs/ pokerth* pokerth.png* You don't have /usr/share/pokerth in your $PATH (which is correct), so why does it get called? What does which pokerth tell you? And what dpkg -S /usr/share/pokerth? It seems that dir and it's contents do not come from a package? Did you have PokerTH installed from source? Regards -- After Intrepid PokerTH starts without any pictures (background, players etc.) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299407 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 299407] Re: After Intrepid PokerTH starts without any pictures (background, players etc.)
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:00:25 - Igor Gomes wrote: Before the upgrade, it was starting fine. The command on the menu entry was /usr/share/pokertk/pokertk and still being after the upgrade, when I tried to play. That *can't* be. I just looked at the Hardy package of PokerTH - it calls pokerth only (which then will be searched in your $PATH) and it installs the binary to /usr/bin, not to /usr/share/pokerth. Where does your /usr/share/pokerth/pokerth come from? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ which pokerth /usr/games/pokerth thats fine [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ dpkg -S /usr/share/pokerth dpkg: /usr/share/pokerth not found. Well, where do your files in /usr/share/pokerth come from then? Puzzled, Evgeni -- After Intrepid PokerTH starts without any pictures (background, players etc.) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299407 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 251736] Re: please resync the latest changes with Debian
Hi,
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:44:50 - James Westby wrote:
- CFLAGS=$(CFLAGS) LDFLAGS=$(LDFLAGS) $(MAKE)
+ CFLAGS=$(CFLAGS) LDFLAGS=$(LDFLAGS) $(MAKE) KDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian
This one is (or was?) needed, because Ubuntu didn't have uvesafb.h in
linux-libc-dev (and it still hasn't).
-copy_exec /sbin/v86d
+mkdir -p ${DESTDIR}/sbin
+
+copy_exec /sbin/v86d /sbin
This is unneeded, as copy_exec will create the destination directory on
its own and copy the file to the same prefix (/sbin) if it's ommited
--
please resync the latest changes with Debian
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251736
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 251736] Re: please resync the latest changes with Debian
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:00:01 - Manny Vindiola wrote:
I am going to keep this change and note why I am keeping it in the change
log:
- CFLAGS=$(CFLAGS) LDFLAGS=$(LDFLAGS) $(MAKE)
+ CFLAGS=$(CFLAGS) LDFLAGS=$(LDFLAGS) $(MAKE) KDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian
I am going to remove this change:
-copy_exec /sbin/v86d
+mkdir -p ${DESTDIR}/sbin
+
+copy_exec /sbin/v86d /sbin
Anything I am missing?
Nah, that looks sane to me.
Btw, it would be nice to convince your linux-libc-dev Maintainers to
ship uvesafb.h, that would make our all life much easier (you could
just use Debian's version without any changes).
Regards
--
please resync the latest changes with Debian
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251736
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 300803] [NEW] linux-libc-dev: please include video/uvesafb.h
Public bug reported: Hi, currently Ubuntu does not ship /usr/include/video/uvesafb.h in linux- libc-dev (it does in various linux-headers-* but that does not help while building packages needing that file), as a result of this, v86d has to ship an own (maybe outdated) copy of that file. Could you please ship it? That would make the diff between Debian and Ubuntu v86d smaller (actually zero) and make our life easier. Regards Evgeni Golov Debian v86d Maintainer ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- linux-libc-dev: please include video/uvesafb.h https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300803 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 251736] Re: please resync the latest changes with Debian
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:14:06 - Evgeni Golov wrote: Btw, it would be nice to convince your linux-libc-dev Maintainers to ship uvesafb.h, that would make our all life much easier (you could just use Debian's version without any changes). https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/300803 :) -- please resync the latest changes with Debian https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251736 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 300814] [NEW] please sync 1:0.0.20081004-1 from Debian/experimental
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: hdapsd Hey, please sync hdapsd 1:0.0.20081004-1 from Debian with the attached diff ontop. This version is currently only in experimental because we are in freeze for Lenny and no new upstreams should be uploaded to unstable in that time. It's stable and should go to jaunty without problems. This releases fixes #218072 in the Debian version and #258342 in the attached Ubuntu-version. regards Evgeni ** Affects: hdapsd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- please sync 1:0.0.20081004-1 from Debian/experimental https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300814 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 300814] Re: please sync 1:0.0.20081004-1 from Debian/experimental
** Attachment added: debdiff between 1:0.0.20081004-1 and 1:0.0.20081004-1ubuntu1 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19843308/hdapsd-0.0.20081004-1ubuntu1.debdiff -- please sync 1:0.0.20081004-1 from Debian/experimental https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300814 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 197437] Re: desmume fails to start with GLXBadContext error
This is fixed in 0.8-2 in Debian. -- desmume fails to start with GLXBadContext error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197437 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 234304] Re: sungem ifconfig problem on sparc64
Hey, this is present in 2.6.26, 2.6.27 and 2.6.28-rc7 :( ** Tags added: linux-2.6.27 -- sungem ifconfig problem on sparc64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234304 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 258803] Re: Current version is obsolete
In the meantime, you can get a version from my PPA: deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/sargentd/ubuntu hardy main deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/sargentd/ubuntu hardy main -- Current version is obsolete https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258803 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 258031] Re: v86d crashed with SIGSEGV
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #505977 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=505977 ** Also affects: v86d (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=505977 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- v86d crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258031 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 302563] Re: package pokerth None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/pokerth.list] failed to install/upgrade: ??????? ? ?????? ?????????? ??? `./usr/share/pixmaps/pokerth.png' (??? ?????????? ?? ??????
1. Please report bugs with LC_ALL=C, noone can read Greek. 2. There is no bug in PokerTH, your NFS just did something wrong. ** Changed in: pokerth (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- package pokerth None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/pokerth.list] failed to install/upgrade: ??? ? ?? ?? ??? `./usr/share/pixmaps/pokerth.png' (??? ?? ?? ???): Stale NFS file handle https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/302563 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 222094] Re: integer type is defined as 64 bit on x86-64, but dgesv_ expects 32 bit
It's a bug in libf2c2, not in lapack3 ** Changed in: lapack3 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- integer type is defined as 64 bit on x86-64, but dgesv_ expects 32 bit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 222094] Re: integer type is defined as 64 bit on x86-64, but dgesv_ expects 32 bit
That is fixed in 20061008-4.1 in Debian unstable (the problem was in f2c.h). Please sync. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #442018 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=442018 ** Also affects: libf2c2 (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=442018 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: libf2c2 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Evgeni Golov (sargentd) Status: New = Confirmed -- integer type is defined as 64 bit on x86-64, but dgesv_ expects 32 bit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 490387] Re: Please sync monkeystudio 1.8.4.0~beta1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).
FTBFS forwarded Upstream They will fix this ASAP -- Please sync monkeystudio 1.8.4.0~beta1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/490387 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 450821] Re: Yabause crashes with segmentation fault on launch
Ok, I just uploaded a fixed mini18n 0.1.0-2 to Debian sid. Now someone has to pull the package to Karmic :) ** Also affects: mini18n (Debian) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: mini18n (Debian) Status: New = Fix Committed -- Yabause crashes with segmentation fault on launch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450821 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 454829] [NEW] Please sync mini18n 0.1-2 from Debian sid main
Public bug reported: I've just uploaded mini18n 0.1-2 to Debian sid main for fixing #450821. The changes contain a patch to fix the segfault and some minor packaging cleanup, debian/changelog says: mini18n (0.1-2) unstable; urgency=low * debian/control: + Add quilt Build-Dep. + Update my email-address. + Put debug package into debug section. + Standards-Version: 3.8.3. * debian/rules: + Use quilt for patch handling. * debian/patches/01_fix_segfault_LP450821.patch: + Fix segfault with a patch from upstream SVN. LP: #450821 * debian/README.source: + Add README.source telling where info about quilt can be found. -- Evgeni Golov evg...@debian.org Sun, 18 Oct 2009 18:18:54 +0200 TIA Evgeni ** Affects: mini18n (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Please sync mini18n 0.1-2 from Debian sid main https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454829 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 450821] Re: Yabause crashes with segmentation fault on launch
** Changed in: mini18n (Debian) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- Yabause crashes with segmentation fault on launch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450821 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 392983] Re: Please sync pokerth (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
** Changed in: pokerth (Ubuntu) Assignee: MOTU (motu) = (unassigned) -- Please sync pokerth (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392983 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 355689] Re: nexuiz leaves fullscreen and loses focus (Jaunty beta1)
** Summary changed: - nexuiz in Jaunty beta1 + nexuiz leaves fullscreen and loses focus (Jaunty beta1) -- nexuiz leaves fullscreen and loses focus (Jaunty beta1) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355689 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 324366] Re: Nexuiz won't start : [X Error of failed request: BadRequest (invalid request code or no such operation) ]
Hi, for me that sounds like a Xorg issue, but nexuiz triggering it. Could you provide your Xorg.log when this happens, including some info like Xorg version, Driver name and Version and Nexuiz version (I guess 2.4.2?). Regards Evgeni -- Nexuiz won't start : [X Error of failed request: BadRequest (invalid request code or no such operation) ] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324366 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 215909] Re: nexuiz.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
Hi this bug is over a year old. Does it still happen on a recent Ubuntu release with Nexuiz 2.4.2? Regards -- nexuiz.bin crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215909 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 97111] Re: [apport] nexuiz crashed with SIGSEGV in Reassociate()
Is this still happening with a recentish Ubuntu/Nexuiz release? Looing at your report, it says Reassociate () from /usr/lib/dri/fglrx_dri.so Which means you run the closed-source ATI driver, which is known to play bad in some situations. Any chance you can try using radeon or radeonhd with your card? These should be much more sane in terms of correct DRI usage. Regards Evgeni -- [apport] nexuiz crashed with SIGSEGV in Reassociate() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97111 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 392983] [NEW] Please sync pokerth (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: pokerth 0.7.1 is mostly a bugfix release, improving network performance etc. It'd be nice to have it in karmic, even when I know the DebianSync frame is closed. ** Affects: pokerth (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: MOTU (motu) Status: New ** Changed in: pokerth (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = MOTU (motu) -- Please sync pokerth (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392983 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 381646] Re: package rott 1.0+dfsg-2 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso post-installation scri pt devolvió el código de salida de error 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 305779 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305779 Thanks for reporting a reported bug. #305779 ** Changed in: rott (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 305779 package rott None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/rott.list] failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- package rott 1.0+dfsg-2 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso post-installation script devolvió el código de salida de error 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381646 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 381130] Re: package rott 1.0+dfsg-2 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso post-installation script devolvi? el c?digo de salida de error 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 305779 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305779 Thanks for reporting a reported bug. #305779 ** Changed in: rott (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 305779 package rott None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/rott.list] failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- package rott 1.0+dfsg-2 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso post-installation script devolvi? el c?digo de salida de error 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381130 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 357367] Re: package nexuiz-data None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/nexuiz-data.list] failed to install/upgrade: failed in buffer_write(fd) (10, ret=-1): backend dpkg-deb during `./usr/share/games
That does not look like an nexius-data issue. More like your harddrive or such. Thus invalid, please reopen if you can show how this is nexius-data related :) ** Changed in: nexuiz-data (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- package nexuiz-data None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/nexuiz-data.list] failed to install/upgrade: failed in buffer_write(fd) (10, ret=-1): backend dpkg-deb during `./usr/share/games/nexuiz/data/data.pk3' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357367 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301124] Re: package nexuiz-data None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/nexuiz-data.list] failed to install/upgrade: short read in buffer_copy (backend dpkg-deb during `./usr/share/games/nexuiz/data/d
Marking as invalid as it looks more like an issue with your harddrive or filesystem. Please reopen if you can prove otherwise. ** Changed in: nexuiz-data (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- package nexuiz-data None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/nexuiz-data.list] failed to install/upgrade: short read in buffer_copy (backend dpkg-deb during `./usr/share/games/nexuiz/data/data.pk3') https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301124 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 277748] Re: Nexuiz demands a user to update to a new version
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #522738 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=522738 ** Also affects: nexuiz-data (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=522738 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Nexuiz demands a user to update to a new version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 391055] [NEW] Please backport nexuiz-data 2.4.2-2 to Jaunty and Intrepid
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nexuiz-data 2.4.2-2 was just synced to Karmic and should be backported to Jaunty and Intrepid. This version won't nag users about an upgrade anymore and works fine with nexuiz 2.4.2-1 as in Jaunty and Intrepid. ** Affects: intrepid-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: jaunty-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: nexuiz-data (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: intrepid-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: jaunty-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - Please backport nexuiz-data 2.4.2-2 to Jauntry and Intrepid + Please backport nexuiz-data 2.4.2-2 to Jaunty and Intrepid -- Please backport nexuiz-data 2.4.2-2 to Jaunty and Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391055 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 391060] [NEW] Please sync 0.40-5 from Debian/Sid to Karmic
Public bug reported: 0.40-5 was uploaded to Debian 6 days ago and it would be really nice to have it in Karmic. Please sync :) ** Affects: tp-smapi (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: MOTU (motu) Status: New ** Changed in: tp-smapi (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = MOTU (motu) -- Please sync 0.40-5 from Debian/Sid to Karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391060 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 391060] Re: Please sync 0.40-5 from Debian/Sid to Karmic
0.40-5 was autosynced today, closing this now. ** Changed in: tp-smapi (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released ** Changed in: tp-smapi (Ubuntu) Assignee: MOTU (motu) = (unassigned) -- Please sync 0.40-5 from Debian/Sid to Karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391060 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 389782] Re: /etc/depmod.d/ubuntu.conf ignored (updates directory not searched)
This was fixed in http://git.debian.org/?p=users/evgeni/tp-smapi.git;a=commit;h=dd51517f51ee9497f81c96f881e8e046dd8d0071 Which is present in tp-smapi-source 0.40-3 and later (karmic has -5). ** Changed in: tp-smapi (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Released -- /etc/depmod.d/ubuntu.conf ignored (updates directory not searched) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389782 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 404656] Re: playing on network or internet not possible due to too old programm version
Please use 0.6.3 from Intrepid Backports or 0.7.1 from the official PPA at https://launchpad.net/~pkg-games/+archive/ppa -- playing on network or internet not possible due to too old programm version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404656 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303915] Re: New interface in kernel 2.6.27 and new version of hdapsd
Why you dont just fetch the version from debian/experimental? -- New interface in kernel 2.6.27 and new version of hdapsd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303915 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154807] Re: hdapsd configuration only supports one disk; my machine has two...
Hey, are you still interested in multidisk support? I've hacked a bit on it, can you have a look at http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.hdaps.devel/1474 and compile that hdaps.c and try it? Regards Evgeni -- hdapsd configuration only supports one disk; my machine has two... https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154807 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 621493] Re: grub2 unicode support on encrypted ubuntu
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 615769 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615769 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #641751 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=641751 ** Also affects: grub2 (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=641751 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621493 Title: grub2 unicode support on encrypted ubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/621493/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 930907] [NEW] Sync monkeystudio 1.9.0.1-2 (universe) from Debian sid (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync monkeystudio 1.9.0.1-2 (universe) from Debian sid (main) Changelog entries since current precise version 1.9.0.1-1build1: monkeystudio (1.9.0.1-2) unstable; urgency=low * fix keyboard shortcuts with qscintilla2 = 2.6 patch by upstream (02_qscintilla2_2.6_keyfix.patch) -- Evgeni Golov evg...@debian.org Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:48:29 +0100 ** Affects: monkeystudio (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930907 Title: Sync monkeystudio 1.9.0.1-2 (universe) from Debian sid (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/monkeystudio/+bug/930907/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 930906] [NEW] Sync pokerth 0.9.3-1 (universe) from Debian sid (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync pokerth 0.9.3-1 (universe) from Debian sid (main) Changelog entries since current precise version 0.9.2-1: pokerth (0.9.3-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream bugfix release. -- Evgeni Golov evg...@debian.org Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:42:59 +0100 ** Affects: pokerth (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930906 Title: Sync pokerth 0.9.3-1 (universe) from Debian sid (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pokerth/+bug/930906/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 924175] [NEW] Sync pokerth 0.9.2-1 (universe) from Debian sid (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync pokerth 0.9.2-1 (universe) from Debian sid (main) Changelog entries since current precise version 0.9.1-1: pokerth (0.9.2-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream bugfix release. -- Evgeni Golov evg...@debian.org Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:54:19 +0100 ** Affects: pokerth (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/924175 Title: Sync pokerth 0.9.2-1 (universe) from Debian sid (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pokerth/+bug/924175/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 603191] Re: E: thinkfan: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2
do you have any logs what happened to return badly? the thinkfan postinst script doesnt do anything that could go really wrong. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/603191 Title: E: thinkfan: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thinkfan/+bug/603191/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 596020] Re: feature request: disengaged or full-speed level
this is now possible in 0.7.3-1 that just hit debian unstable. you *may* need to use 127 as disengaged. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596020 Title: feature request: disengaged or full-speed level To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thinkfan/+bug/596020/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 781654] Re: Fan turns at high speed all the time
Is START=yes set in /etc/default/thinkfan? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/781654 Title: Fan turns at high speed all the time To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thinkfan/+bug/781654/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 787031] Re: installing thinkfan package does not make thinkfan usable
This works on non-Thinkpads without fan_control=1. Additionally, it wouldn't help, as the module is most probably loaded and the option would only be used on the next reboot. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787031 Title: installing thinkfan package does not make thinkfan usable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thinkfan/+bug/787031/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 787697] Re: thinkfan doesn't find temperature sensors
@mejo: Did you configure thinkfan according to /usr/share/doc/thinkfan/examples/thinkfan.conf.sysfs? It defaults to the thinkpad-specific configuration @pascal did you configure thinkpad_acpi with fan_control=1? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787697 Title: thinkfan doesn't find temperature sensors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thinkfan/+bug/787697/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 878010] Re: hdaps installed 11.10 amd64
Besides hitting me too, more information would pe nice. I don't see how this could be fixed besides of adding Recommends: tp-smapi-dkms to hdapsd -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878010 Title: hdaps installed 11.10 amd64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hdapsd/+bug/878010/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 878010] Re: hdaps installed 11.10 amd64
hdapsd did not change between 11.04 and 11.10, so unlikely a bug here. what hardware are you running? do you have tp-smapi installed? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878010 Title: hdaps installed 11.10 amd64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hdapsd/+bug/878010/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 878010] Re: hdaps installed 11.10 amd64
the AWN applet is just a status view, it wont help you here. can you please post the output of 1. sudo modinfo hdaps 2. sudo modprobe hdaps (shouldnt output anything actually) 3. dmesg |grep hdaps -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878010 Title: hdaps installed 11.10 amd64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hdapsd/+bug/878010/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 878010] Re: hdaps installed 11.10 amd64
But enough for me to explain it to you :) 1. says you are using the in-kernel hdaps driver 2. says the driver cannot load as it cannot find the hdaps device 3. more info about 2 :) Could you please install linux-headers-generic and tp-smapi-dkms and rerun the commands above? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878010 Title: hdaps installed 11.10 amd64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hdapsd/+bug/878010/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 878010] Re: hdaps installed 11.10 amd64
okay, could you try a dpkg-reconfigure tp-smapi-dkms and show sudo modinfo hdaps after that? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878010 Title: hdaps installed 11.10 amd64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hdapsd/+bug/878010/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 878010] Re: hdaps installed 11.10 amd64
hah, it works! you just started it wrong try sudo /etc/init.d/hdapsd start or sudo hdapsd for testing -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878010 Title: hdaps installed 11.10 amd64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hdapsd/+bug/878010/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 878010] Re: hdaps installed 11.10 amd64
:) Beer, flattr (https://flattr.com/profile/evgeni) and better documentation always welcome ;) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878010 Title: hdaps installed 11.10 amd64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hdapsd/+bug/878010/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 884656] Re: pokerth stops at 80% when trying to start internetgame
Please either use the pokerth.debian.net server for playing. Or update to the latest PokerTH version to use upstream's server: https://launchpad.net/~pkg-games/+archive/ppa?field.series_filter=lucid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884656 Title: pokerth stops at 80% when trying to start internetgame To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pokerth/+bug/884656/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 770962] Re: fenix version 0.92a.dfsg1-5 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric
Ah, sorry, you were building -5, which is old and has this bug, -6 has the fix, -8 currently FTBFS (as mentioned above), -9 will come soon. Closing here. ** Changed in: fenix (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770962 Title: fenix version 0.92a.dfsg1-5 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 771087] Re: mmpong version 0.9.1-1 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #565039 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=565039 ** Also affects: mmpong (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=565039 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/771087 Title: mmpong version 0.9.1-1 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 760751] Re: package v86d 0.1.9-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
your system seems really f*cked up. see the DpkgTerminalLog.gz. marking as invalid. ** Changed in: v86d (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760751 Title: package v86d 0.1.9-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 749080] Re: kanatest version 0.4.8-1 failed to build on i386
** Changed in: kanatest (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/749080 Title: kanatest version 0.4.8-1 failed to build on i386 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 671146] Re: poker TH 0.7.1. doesn't work, connection is stopped by server
Would you mind using the *official* PPA from the Games Team? Also linked from upstream homepage: https://launchpad.net/~pkg-games/+archive/ppa/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671146 Title: poker TH 0.7.1. doesn't work,connection is stopped by server -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 682188] Re: Monkey Studio crash on project create
** Changed in: monkeystudio (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682188 Title: Monkey Studio crash on project create To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/monkeystudio/+bug/682188/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 770962] Re: fenix version 0.92a.dfsg1-5 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric
Heya, sorry, but I cannot reproduce this neither on current i386 Sid nor i386 Oneiric. amd64 should not get a build anyways. BTW, it ftbfs for another reason (it tries to call gcc with --as- needed), but that's not the report here. Your log misses -lm -ldl at the very end of the command line. This is passed as LIBS to configure in debian/rules. I'd like to close it here, as (from my POV) your bug is not a bug (and upload a fix for the other ftbfs asap) ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #554286 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=554286 ** Also affects: fenix (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=554286 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770962 Title: fenix version 0.92a.dfsg1-5 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 770857] Re: late version 0.1.0-11 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #624937 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624937 ** Also affects: late (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624937 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770857 Title: late version 0.1.0-11 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 770805] Re: libclaw version 1.6.1-3 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #624919 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624919 ** Also affects: libclaw (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624919 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770805 Title: libclaw version 1.6.1-3 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 770932] Re: libsfml version 1.6+dfsg1-1 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #625031 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=625031 ** Also affects: libsfml (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=625031 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770932 Title: libsfml version 1.6+dfsg1-1 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 765973] Re: alex4 version 1.1-3 failed to build on i386
-4 in oneiric builds fine on i386 ** Changed in: alex4 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765973 Title: alex4 version 1.1-3 failed to build on i386 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 730653] Re: Package alex4-1.1-3 failed to build from source with ld --as-needed option
Fixed in -4, which already hit Oneiric ** Changed in: alex4 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/730653 Title: Package alex4-1.1-3 failed to build from source with ld --as-needed option -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 765984] Re: adonthell version 0.3.5-5build1 failed to build on i386
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #624998 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624998 ** Also affects: adonthell (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624998 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765984 Title: adonthell version 0.3.5-5build1 failed to build on i386 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 765942] Re: btanks version 0.9.8083-2 failed to build on i386
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #624916 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624916 ** Also affects: btanks (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624916 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765942 Title: btanks version 0.9.8083-2 failed to build on i386 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 770970] Re: kiki-the-nano-bot version 1.0.2+dfsg1-3build1 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #625047 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=625047 ** Also affects: kiki-the-nano-bot (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=625047 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770970 Title: kiki-the-nano-bot version 1.0.2+dfsg1-3build1 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 749195] Re: kball version 0.0.20041216-6ubuntu1 failed to build on i386
Fixed in -7, waits for sync. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #565011 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=565011 ** Also affects: kball (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=565011 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/749195 Title: kball version 0.0.20041216-6ubuntu1 failed to build on i386 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 474392] Re: LTSP Clients show shutdown, hibernate in indicator-applet-session
Just my 2¢: indicator-session is just a gui, the user should not have the right to shutdown the machine in the first place (consolekit, policykit or whatever allows him to do so). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/474392 Title: LTSP Clients show shutdown, hibernate in indicator-applet-session To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-session/+bug/474392/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 371916] [NEW] please sync 0.1.9-1 from Debian
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: v86d Hi, some time ago I've uploaded 0.1.9 to Debian, which today migrated to testing and seems to work fine. Please sync it into karmic. The uvesafb.h adding isn't needed anymore, as linux-libc-dev has it (in jaunty and karmic), so you can auto-sync the package without any manual merges :) Regards Evgeni ** Affects: v86d (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- please sync 0.1.9-1 from Debian https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371916 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 335628] Re: lintian error: menu-item-creates-new-root-section
Ugh? Which version of lintian do you use? Here on 2.2.10 (on Debian unstable) this warning isn't shown, as Applications is a valid root entry in the Debian menu. -- lintian error: menu-item-creates-new-root-section https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335628 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370289] Re: Does not support Thinkpad X200
I've reported this upstream, expect it to be in the next release :) -- Does not support Thinkpad X200 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370289 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 372185] Re: sdlbasic-0.0.20070714-2 help path is wrong
confirmed on Debian Sid, this is also present here. Will fix and request a sync. ** Changed in: sdlbasic (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: sdlbasic (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Evgeni Golov (sargentd) -- sdlbasic-0.0.20070714-2 help path is wrong https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372185 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 372185] Re: sdlbasic-0.0.20070714-2 help path is wrong
Just commited the patch to pkg-games SVN, will be uploaded to Debian soon. ** Changed in: sdlbasic (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed -- sdlbasic-0.0.20070714-2 help path is wrong https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372185 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
