[Bug 140921] Re: Wrong firmware for ivtv driver

[Martin Dauskardt]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 99107 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99107

yes, the firmware included in Gutsy is not the recommended one.

The recommended firmware version for the ivtv driver is included in 
http://dl.ivtvdriver.org/ivtv/firmware/firmware.tar.gz
It is indeed a 376836 bytes file. 

Unfortunately the ivtv version included in kernel 2.6.22 has a bug, see
http://ivtvdriver.org/index.php/Troubleshooting#Kernel_2.6.22_firmware_size

@ Ubuntu developers:
I recommend to fix the bug in the next release of the ubuntu 2.6.22-kernel and 
supply the correct firmware

-- 
Wrong firmware for ivtv driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/140921
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 360282] Re: x server will not start up

[Martin Dauskardt]

I have exactly the same problem since I made an upgrade from Jaunty beta
to RC1 yesterday. I have also configured autologin.

-- 
x server will not start up
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/360282
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 393801] [NEW] cvidix driver for PVR350 (ivtv) missing

[Martin Dauskardt]

Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: mplayer

mplayer has three ivtv-related output drivers:

1.  ivtv 
This one is for using the hardware decoder (/dev/video16) of the PVR350 card 
and works only with older ivtv drivers. Since 2.6.22 ivtv is in the kernel and 
this driver is obsolete. Ubuntu has disabled this driver, because it cannot be 
built with recent kernels

2. v4l2  
This is for for using the hardware decoder of the PVR350 card with kernel = 
2.6.22

3. cvidix:ivtv
This is a totally different output driver and has nothing to do with the first 
one, except it is also namend ivtv. The cvidix subdriver ivtv uses the YUV 
device (/dev/video48) of the PVR350, similar to a graphics card. 
Unfortunately the mplayer configure script checks for a wrong dependency:

  test $_vidix_drivers || _vidix_drivers=cyberblade ivtv mach64 mga 
mga_crtc2 nvidia pm2 pm3 radeon rage128 s3 sh_veu sis unichrome
  test $_ivtv = yes || _vidix_drivers=`echo $_vidix_drivers | sed s/ivtv//`

The second check means that in case the first driver (ivtv) is
disabled, the cvidix ivtv subdriver will also be removed from the list
of drivers. This is wrong!

Please rebuild the mplayer package with uncommenting the second check:

  test $_vidix_drivers || _vidix_drivers=cyberblade ivtv mach64 mga 
mga_crtc2 nvidia pm2 pm3 radeon rage128 s3 sh_veu sis unichrome
  #test $_ivtv = yes || _vidix_drivers=`echo $_vidix_drivers | sed s/ivtv//`

I will also post this to the mplayer mailing list.

** Affects: mplayer (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
cvidix driver for PVR350 (ivtv) missing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393801
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 393801] Re: cvidix driver for PVR350 (ivtv) missing

[Martin Dauskardt]

http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/mplayer-users/2009-June/077194.html

-- 
cvidix driver for PVR350 (ivtv) missing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393801
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 393801] Re: cvidix driver for PVR350 (ivtv) missing

[Martin Dauskardt]

Unfortunately no mplayer developer seems to read the mplayer-users list.
While I am waiting for approval by the mplayer-devel moderator, I made a
Bugzilla entry: http://bugzilla.mplayerhq.hu/show_bug.cgi?id=1509


** Bug watch added: Mplayer Bugzilla #1509
   http://bugzilla.mplayerhq.hu/show_bug.cgi?id=1509

-- 
cvidix driver for PVR350 (ivtv) missing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393801
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 393801] Re: cvidix driver for PVR350 (ivtv) missing

[Martin Dauskardt]

The big has finally been fixed:
http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/mplayer-dev-eng/2009-July/061870.html

Would be nice if the Ubuntu mplayer maintainers could build a new
package, with should now automatically include the ivtv cvidix driver

-- 
cvidix driver for PVR350 (ivtv) missing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393801
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 278770] Re: Black/pink screen after boot, stopped by Ctrl-Alt-Backspace

[Martin Dauskardt]

I can conform this. Only difference with my GeForce 6150 onboard graphic
is that I have a complete dark screen with white lines/strokes after
booting, no colours.

-- 
Black/pink screen after boot, stopped by Ctrl-Alt-Backspace
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278770
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 539422] [NEW] KFind 4.4.1 not being able to search in file contents

[Martin Dauskardt]

Public bug reported:

There came a big bug with Revision 1092333 into kfind (kquery.cpp)  on 
18.02.2010 in KDE SVN:
http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/KDE/kdebase/apps/kfind/kquery.cpp?sortby=dateview=log
The bug has already been fixed (see Revision 1098983 and explanation in 
Revision 1099017), but unfortunately the bug came into the 4.4.1 KDE SC release.
It is therefore present in 4:4.4.1-0ubuntu1~karmic1~ppa1 and in the Lucid 
package 4:4.4.1-0ubuntu3. 

I strongly recommend to build new packages based on the svn fixes.

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
KFind 4.4.1 not being able to search in file contents
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539422
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 590220] Re: installer slow

[Martin Dauskardt]

I noticed the same behaviour with the Karmic installer and was hoping
that Maverick would be faster.

Just tried the 10.10 beta Desktop CD: 
After choosing Install Ubuntu  it takes 18s until the next menu appears.
I choosed Tick this box... and it takes 3s until the box is marked.

In the menu Preparing to install it takes 46s after hitting the
Forward-Button.

During preparing the partitions (every click results again in a 30s
pause) the screen goes black for a second. After the menu reappeared my
mouse lost its cursor.

I can't  believe that this is something the developers are not able to
reproduce.

Just an idea: my machine has an ATI Radeon 7000 card. Maybe this is a problem 
with kernel mode setting?
The graphic preformance of the Maverick Live CD is also very poor (slow) - 
obviously no improvement compared to Karmic.

I managed to copy the whole content of /var/log to an USB stick. Let me
know what you need

-- 
installer slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590220
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 590220] Re: installer slow

[Martin Dauskardt]

sorry, I meant obviously no improvement compared to Lucid

-- 
installer slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590220
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 539422] Re: KFind 4.4.1 not being able to search in file contents

[Martin Dauskardt]

When will this become decided and assigned?

Will this be fixed before the final Lucid Kubuntu release?

-- 
KFind 4.4.1 not being able to search in file contents
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539422
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to kdebase in ubuntu.

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1250196] Re: sane plustek backend not working on USB 3 root hub

[Martin Dauskardt]

since upgrading to a Board with USB 3.0 (Intel H87 chipset) I have the same 
problems with my Canon LIDE20.
If I install an old USB 2.0 PCI Controller card, it works.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1250196

Title:
  sane plustek backend not working on USB 3 root hub

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1250196/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1277552] Re: libpostproc52 does not support multiarch

[Martin Dauskardt]

during the upgrade from 13.10 to 14.04. I got this error which stopped
the upgrade

dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten des Archivs 
/var/cache/apt/archives/libpostproc52_6%3a0.git20120821-4_amd64.deb (--unpack):
 libpostproc52:amd64 6:0.git20120821-4 (Multi-Arch: no) kann nicht zusammen mit 
libpostproc52 installiert werden, welches mehrere installierte Instanzen hat


The workaround described by Julien helped.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1277552

Title:
  libpostproc52 does not support multiarch

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/kaffeine/+bug/1277552/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1422132] Re: Canoscan LIDE 20 (plustek backend) not working anymore

[Martin Dauskardt]

This problems exists since months and is still present in 14.10.

For me, it only happens when I use the onboard USB (2.0 or 3.0) of my
mainboard. With an older USB 2.0 PCI card the scanner still works with
sane.

And I can also use the scanner with the onboard USB controller, when I
start Windows XP in VirtualBox , which uses an older USB 2.0 protocol.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1422132

Title:
  Canoscan LIDE 20 (plustek backend) not working anymore

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1422132/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1422132] Re: Canoscan LIDE 20 (plustek backend) not working anymore

[Martin Dauskardt]

es gibt in dem ppa von Rolf Bensch aktualisierte sane-Pakete, mit denen
geht mein Lide20 wieder:

sudo add-apt-repository ppa:rolfbensch/sane-git
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get dist-upgrade

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1422132

Title:
  Canoscan LIDE 20 (plustek backend) not working anymore

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1422132/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1442169] Re: cupsd crashed with SIGSEGV in avahi_entry_group_free()

[Martin Dauskardt]

I wonder how much bug reports are necessary to get this assigned to
anybody...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1442169

Title:
  cupsd crashed with SIGSEGV in avahi_entry_group_free()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1442169/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1512120] Re: thunar crashes on file renaming

[Martin Dauskardt]

In https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12264#c30 there is a patch
from thunar developer Harald Judt in comment 30 (2016-02-17 18:17:30 CET
). This patch fixes all my problems with thunar. There was an earlier
patch from him (Deactivate-SEND_MOVED-code-paths) which is no longer
necessary when thunar is patched with Check-if-a-thunar-file-is-still-
valid-before-reloading.patch from comment 30.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512120

Title:
  thunar crashes on file renaming

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunar/+bug/1512120/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1512120]

[Martin-dauskardt]

@ pgkos:

Which version of thunar was the base for this patch?

-1.6.10 vanilla?

-1.6.10 with patches from Distribution?
(1.6.10 in Xubuntu 16.10 has for example some additional patches, including the 
Check-if-a-thunar-file-is-still-valid-before-reloading.patch  from 17.02.2016 
from Harald Judt, which is not in master git.

-git master branch?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512120

Title:
  [SRU] thunar crashes on file renaming

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunar/+bug/1512120/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1512120]

[Martin-dauskardt]

What slumbergod reported is absolutely on-topic. The problems he and Yuri were 
writing about are known side-effect of an earlier patch (which we all hoped 
that it could be a solution for the renaming/remove crash.)
The side effects with this patch (when accessing USB drives and other file 
systems) have already been reported in #131 and #136.
Obviously Peter wasn't aware of the whole story.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512120

Title:
  [SRU] thunar crashes on file renaming

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunar/+bug/1512120/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1512120]

[Martin-dauskardt]

You are not the only one.
I use 15.10, but 16.04 is obviously also effected.
If you have the 64 bit version, you could try my binary. It also works on 
16.04. 
Have a look here: https://forum.ubuntuusers.de/post/8172653/
You need to rename the attachment, make it executable, change the owner to root 
and replace /usr/bin/thunar. A reboot is recommended.

While some users are regularly effected, others seem to have no
problems. I read anywhere that it may depend on your view settings
(detailed list view with showing of the file date?)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512120

Title:
  [SRU] thunar crashes on file renaming

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunar/+bug/1512120/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1512120]

[Martin-dauskardt]

The patch from Harald Judt in comment 30 of this thread resolves all my
problems with thunar. There was an earlier patch from him (Deactivate-
SEND_MOVED-code-paths) which is no longer necessary when thunar is
patched with Check-if-a-thunar-file-is-still-valid-before-
reloading.patch from comment 30.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512120

Title:
  [SRU] thunar crashes on file renaming

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunar/+bug/1512120/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1512120]

[Martin-dauskardt]

Are you really sure that new compiled thunar was running?
I suggest to remove the old /usr/bin/thunar and make a reboot

I did not use the git as base but patched the Ubuntu 15.10 source
instead. You can find my compiled binary in the ubuntuusers forum. It
should also work with Xubuntu 16.04

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512120

Title:
  [SRU] thunar crashes on file renaming

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunar/+bug/1512120/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1512120]

[Martin-dauskardt]

Created attachment 6660
64 bit binary with patches from comment 7,14,30,31,41 and master git patch from 
30.11.15

With further testing using the example commands shown in #32 I recognize
still crashes when using the patch from #30.

Same happens with Emils Patch in #41 (If used only or in combination
with #30.)

The patch from Harald in #14 seems to be the most reliable solution,
although he said himself that he still has crashes with it.

To be on the safe side, I now made a new binary which includes the
following patches:

-'Fixing missing return value in standard view' from 30.11.2015 (already
in master git)

-patches from comment Nr. 7, 14, 30, 31, 41 from this page.


Installation: 
tar xvfz thunar.tgz -C /

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512120

Title:
  [SRU] thunar crashes on file renaming

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunar/+bug/1512120/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1512120]

[Martin-dauskardt]

Fine to hear that. Credit goes of course to Harald Judt who made the
patch. I am only the compiler :-)

I discovered another patch in a BSD forum:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208341

Peter, maybe you can try this?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512120

Title:
  [SRU] thunar crashes on file renaming

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunar/+bug/1512120/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1762595] Re: Thunar incorrectly thinks USB storage device hasn't finished ejecting

[Martin Dauskardt]

It's a shame that Ubuntu has still no fix released and even not assigned
the issue to a developer.

I compiled gvfs for Ubuntu 18.04 (64 bit version) with the patch. It
should be sufficient to change /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfs-udisks2-volume-monitor
against the attached new binary.

** Attachment added: "new compiled binary for manual replacement in 
/usr/lib/gvfs"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/archlinux/+source/gvfs/+bug/1762595/+attachment/5158378/+files/gvfs-udisks2-volume-monitor

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1762595

Title:
  Thunar incorrectly thinks USB storage device hasn't finished ejecting

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/1762595/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1722508] Re: Font hinting appears broken on 17.10 beta

[Martin Dauskardt]

In german ubuntuusers forum there is an simpler solution without need to 
downgrade libfreetype.
https://forum.ubuntuusers.de/post/8914328/

Just add

FREETYPE_PROPERTIES="truetype:interpreter-version=35 cff:no-stem-
darkening=1 autofitter:warping=1"

in /etc/environment and restart x-server or reboot.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1722508

Title:
  Font hinting appears broken on 17.10 beta

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qt/+bug/1722508/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1762595] Re: Thunar incorrectly thinks USB storage device hasn't finished ejecting

[Martin Dauskardt]

How long will it take to for 1.36.1-0ubuntu3 to appear in Bionic?
After 
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
I get nothing.
sudo apt-get install gvfs says that gvfs is already the newest version 
(1.36.1-0ubuntu1).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1762595

Title:
  Thunar incorrectly thinks USB storage device hasn't finished ejecting

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/1762595/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1540186] Re: thunar crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_is_fundamentally_a()

[Martin Dauskardt]

After upgrading from Xubuntu 18.04 to 18.10 I have the same segfault
immidiately when starting thunar or when selecting the first
file/folder.

martin@martin-desktop:/tmp$ gdb thunar core
GNU gdb (Ubuntu 8.2-0ubuntu1) 8.2
Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later 
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "x86_64-linux-gnu".
Type "show configuration" for configuration details.
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
.
Find the GDB manual and other documentation resources online at:
.

For help, type "help".
Type "apropos word" to search for commands related to "word"...
Reading symbols from thunar...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
[New LWP 7382]
[New LWP 7383]
[New LWP 7385]
[New LWP 7384]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".
Core was generated by `thunar'.
Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
#0  0x7fe46a618acd in g_type_check_instance_is_fundamentally_a () from 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
[Current thread is 1 (Thread 0x7fe466593a80 (LWP 7382))]
(gdb) bt
#0  0x7fe46a618acd in g_type_check_instance_is_fundamentally_a () at 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#1  0x7fe46a5fe826 in g_object_get_data () at 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#2  0x7fe46b1fd01d in gtk_tree_row_reference_free () at 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0
#3  0x7fe46a4f6aab in g_datalist_clear () at 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
#4  0x7fe46a5f9c82 in g_object_unref () at 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#5  0x7fe46a5f42a4 in g_closure_unref () at 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#6  0x7fe46a60e874 in g_signal_handlers_destroy () at 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#7  0x7fe46a5f925d in  () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#8  0x7fe46a5f9c13 in g_object_unref () at 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#9  0x7fe46a50254f in  () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
#10 0x7fe46a5036a8 in g_hash_table_remove_all () at 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
#11 0x7fe46a5036ee in g_hash_table_destroy () at 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
#12 0x7fe46af6a45d in  () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0
#13 0x7fe46a5f9c82 in g_object_unref () at 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#14 0x55790383764a in  ()
#15 0x7fe46a5f4b6d in g_closure_invoke () at 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#16 0x7fe46a6078f3 in  () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#17 0x7fe46a610882 in g_signal_emit_valist () at 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#18 0x7fe46a610ecf in g_signal_emit () at 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#19 0x7fe46a5f91d4 in  () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#20 0x7fe46a5f8b0e in  () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#21 0x7fe46a5fc6bd in g_object_setv () at 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#22 0x7fe46a5fd71e in g_object_set_property () at 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#23 0x7fe46a5f02f4 in  () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#24 0x7fe46a5f4b6d in g_closure_invoke () at 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#25 0x7fe46a6078f3 in  () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#26 0x7fe46a610882 in g_signal_emit_valist () at 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#27 0x7fe46a610ecf in g_signal_emit () at 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#28 0x7fe46a5f91d4 in  () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#29 0x7fe46a5fb651 in g_object_notify () at 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#30 0x557903839d37 in  ()
#31 0x7fe46a5f4b6d in g_closure_invoke () at 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#32 0x7fe46a6078f3 in  () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#33 0x7fe46a610882 in g_signal_emit_valist () at 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#34 0x7fe46a610ecf in g_signal_emit () at 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#35 0x7fe46a5f4b6d in g_closure_invoke () at 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#36 0x7fe46a6078f3 in  () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#37 0x7fe46a610882 in g_signal_emit_valist () at 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#38 0x7fe46a610ecf in g_signal_emit () at 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#39 0x5579037dbaaa in  ()
#40 0x55790381d812 in  ()
#41 0x55790382060a in  ()
#42 

[Bug 1788036] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in tcache_get()

[Martin Dauskardt]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1786650 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786650

I also see the same segfault showing "tcache_get (tc_idx=0) at
malloc.c:2943" when I use Thunar 1.8.1 on Xubuntu 18.04

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1788036

Title:
  nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in tcache_get()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1788036/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1633702] Re: wistron_btns module possible BUG on FJ AMILO Pro V3505.

[Martin Dauskardt]

same problem here with a MEDION MD 96500 Notebook. wistron_btns causes a
segfault and as a result the machine won't shut down.

A fix has been posted several times to LKML and it is really hard to understand 
why it is ignored.
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/815755/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1633702

Title:
  wistron_btns module possible BUG on FJ AMILO Pro V3505.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1633702/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 430245] Re: suspend/resume failure (ATI Mobility Radeon X700, kernel 2.6.31-10 Karmic Coala)

[Martin Dauskardt]

same problem with Ubuntu 12.04, 16.04, 18.04, 18.10. And even a Bhodi
with Kernel 3.2 shows the same error an resume. Last Distribution which
works with suspend/resume is Ubuntu 9.04.

The workaround with /etc/acpi/sleep.sh force seems to be outdated, as
this file is not present in recent Ubuntus.

Is there anything else I could do?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430245

Title:
  suspend/resume failure (ATI Mobility Radeon X700, kernel 2.6.31-10
  Karmic Coala)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/430245/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 430245] Re: suspend/resume failure (ATI Mobility Radeon X700, kernel 2.6.31-10 Karmic Coala)

[Martin Dauskardt]

same problem with Ubuntu 12.04, 16.04, 18.04, 18.10. And even a Bhodi
with Kernel 3.2 shows the same error an resume. Last Distribution which
works with suspend/resume is Ubuntu 9.04.

The workaround with /etc/acpi/sleep.sh force seems to be outdated, as
this file is not present in recent Ubuntus.

Is there anything else I could do?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430245

Title:
  suspend/resume failure (ATI Mobility Radeon X700, kernel 2.6.31-10
  Karmic Coala)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/430245/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1822380] Re: Thunar right-click menu not expanded

[Martin Dauskardt]

Please change the status to „open“, as the bug is NOT FIXED in 19.04
There are still unnecessaey arrow scrolls!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1822380

Title:
  Thunar right-click menu not expanded

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunar/+bug/1822380/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1822380] Re: Thunar right-click menu not expanded

[Martin Dauskardt]

I can't see any effect of the thunar patch for THIS isue(unnecessaey
arrow scrolls).

There is now a workaround for Nemo:
https://github.com/leigh123linux/nemo/commit/15b3f99a1de6a1d5164bf3d8d66b2246cea734c3

Isn't it possible to implement a similar fix for Thunar?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1822380

Title:
  Thunar right-click menu not expanded

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gtk/+bug/1822380/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1822380] Re: Thunar right-click menu not expanded

[Martin Dauskardt]

The gtk-patch in #5 from
https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-desktop-74/thunar-bug-in-right-mouse-menus-4175651369/
fixes the problem!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1822380

Title:
  Thunar right-click menu not expanded

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gtk/+bug/1822380/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1822380] Re: Thunar right-click menu not expanded

[Martin Dauskardt]

I still have the unnecessary arrow scrolls. What does it mean "the fix
landed the development branches and will be available in the next
release". Which release? Ubuntu 19.10 ??

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1822380

Title:
  Thunar right-click menu not expanded

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunar/+bug/1822380/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1822380] Re: Thunar right-click menu not expanded

[Martin Dauskardt]

For all who are annoyed about the unnecessaey arrow scrolls I attach a
patched libgtk3 for Ubuntu 64bit. It includes the patch I mentioned in
#44.

** Attachment added: "libgtk-3-0_3.24.8-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunar/+bug/1822380/+attachment/5276890/+files/libgtk-3-0_3.24.8-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1822380

Title:
  Thunar right-click menu not expanded

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gtk/+bug/1822380/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs