[Bug 223789] Re: Please backport mercurial 1.0.1-1 from Intrepid to Hardy

2008-07-01 Thread Max Bowsher
** Summary changed:

- [needs-packaging] mercurial 1.0
+ Please backport mercurial 1.0.1-1 from Intrepid to Hardy

** Tags removed: needs-packaging

-- 
Please backport mercurial 1.0.1-1 from Intrepid to Hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223789
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 224110] Re: /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/bin/java: error while loading shared libraries: libjli.so: cannot openshared object file: No such file or directory - /proc/self/exe fullpath error on stac

2008-07-31 Thread Max Bowsher
Andreas: It sounds like you've not mounted /proc in your chroot. That's
different from this bug, which is about a mounted /proc giving incorrect
results when used with unionfs.

-- 
/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/bin/java: error while  loading shared libraries: 
libjli.so: cannot openshared object file:  No such file or directory - 
/proc/self/exe fullpath error on stackable filesystem
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224110
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 296417] [NEW] debchange --distributor option is nonfunctional (jaunty, intrepid-backports, hardy-backports)

2008-11-10 Thread Max Bowsher
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: devscripts

The debchange --distributor option is broken in devscripts
2.10.39ubuntu1 (which has been backported to both intrepid and hardy).

Here is a diff between 2.10.26ubuntu15 (intrepid) and
2.10.39ubuntu1~intrepid1 (intrepid-backports) showing that the code that
sets the actual distributor variable from the command line value has
apparently been inadvertently dropped:

@@ -381,9 +381,7 @@

 # See if we're Debian, Ubuntu or someone else, if we can
 my $distributor;
-if (defined $opt_distributor) {
-$distributor = $opt_distributor;
-} elsif (system('command -v lsb_release >/dev/null 2>&1') >> 8 == 0) {
+if (system('command -v lsb_release >/dev/null 2>&1') >> 8 == 0) {
 $distributor = `lsb_release -is 2>/dev/null`;
 chomp $distributor;
 }

** Affects: devscripts (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
debchange --distributor option is nonfunctional (jaunty, intrepid-backports, 
hardy-backports)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296417
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 275010] Re: Unable to disable the ssh module of gnome-keyring

2008-11-12 Thread Max Bowsher
Here is a workaround that can be enacted purely using non-root config:

1. Add the line "unset SSH_AUTH_SOCK" to ~/.xsessionrc (creating it if it 
doesn't exist).
2. Run gnome-session-properties and untick "GNOME Keyring Daemon Wrapper".

The first makes /etc/X11/Xsession.d/90x11-common_ssh-agent not decide
that it should not start since there is already an existing agent. The
second stops the g-k-r envvars being reinjected into the X session at a
later point in startup.

-- 
Unable to disable the ssh module of gnome-keyring
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275010
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 275010] Re: Unable to disable the ssh module of gnome-keyring

2008-12-03 Thread Max Bowsher
I'm using the workaround I posted on current Intrepid right now. It
works fine at leaving you using an actual ssh-agent.

As for "The daemon is still there.", well yes, nothing in the workaround
stops it running, it just stops it preempting the actual ssh-agent.

-- 
Unable to disable the ssh module of gnome-keyring
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275010
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 275010] Re: Unable to disable the ssh module of gnome-keyring

2008-12-03 Thread Max Bowsher
Jeff, are you seeing gnome-keyring-daemon running (expected) or gnome-
keyring-daemon-wrapper running (not expected, and not running for me) ?

-- 
Unable to disable the ssh module of gnome-keyring
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275010
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 277865] Re: usb-creator crashed with AttributeError in install_bootloader()

2008-11-22 Thread Max Bowsher
Setting to Confirmed as I've independently come across the same issue of
usb-creator breaking on a USB stick without a partition table

** Changed in: usb-creator (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

** Summary changed:

- usb-creator crashed with AttributeError in install_bootloader()
+ usb-creator crashes when USB stick is a single filesystem with no partition 
table. (AttributeError in install_bootloader())

-- 
usb-creator crashes when USB stick is a single filesystem with no partition 
table. (AttributeError in install_bootloader())
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277865
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 277865] Re: usb-creator crashes when USB stick is a single filesystem with no partition table. (AttributeError in install_bootloader())

2008-11-22 Thread Max Bowsher
Supplementary to the core problem of explaining to the user if their USB
stick has no partition table that it cannot be made bootable, a quick
fix that would at least give the user an error rather than a hang would
be to wrap the backend.install_bootloader() call in a try/except block
in the same way backend.copy_files() is.

-- 
usb-creator crashes when USB stick is a single filesystem with no partition 
table. (AttributeError in install_bootloader())
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277865
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 375618] Re: does not pass xkb* settings to xorg server

2009-05-13 Thread Max Bowsher
Confirming

** Changed in: hal (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
does not pass xkb* settings to xorg server
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375618
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 375618] Re: does not pass xkb* settings to xorg server

2009-05-13 Thread Max Bowsher
Attaching Xorg.0.log.old, broken situation running hal
0.5.12~rc1+git20090510-0ubuntu2

** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log.old"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26664559/Xorg.0.log.old

-- 
does not pass xkb* settings to xorg server
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375618
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 375618] Re: does not pass xkb* settings to xorg server

2009-05-13 Thread Max Bowsher
Attaching Xorg.0.log, working situation running hal
0.5.12~rc1+git20090510-0ubuntu1

** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26664570/Xorg.0.log

-- 
does not pass xkb* settings to xorg server
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375618
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 376374] [NEW] Crackling audio, especially from DVDs [karmic regression]

2009-05-14 Thread Max Bowsher
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: pulseaudio

After upgrading to Karmic, I now experience a crackling sound when
playing audio. The problem is very markedly worse for audio from DVDs
(where is is extremely obvious) than for .mp3 files (where most of the
time it is only audible if listening carefully).

A dual-booted Jaunty installation on the same hardware does not suffer
the problem.

I've reproduced the problem in totem-xine, totem-gstreamer, mplayer -ao
pulse, mplayer -ao alsa, xine -A pulseaudio and xine -A alsa.  I'm not
sure if pulseaudio is the right package to be reporting this against -
I'm just picking it in as part of the general underlying audio stack,
and hoping its apport hooks will provide some useful information.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
ArecordDevices:
  List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices 
 card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: AD198x Analog [AD198x Analog]
   Subdevices: 1/1
   Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USER PID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/controlC0:  maxb   5707 F mixer_applet2
Card0.Amixer.info:
 Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xee40 irq 17'
   Mixer name   : 'Analog Devices AD1981'
   Components   : 'HDA:11d41981,17aa2060,00100200'
   Controls  : 20
   Simple ctrls  : 11
Date: Thu May 14 08:33:31 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
Package: pulseaudio 1:0.9.15-1ubuntu3
ProcEnviron:
 LC_COLLATE=C
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.30-5.6-generic
SourcePackage: pulseaudio
Uname: Linux 2.6.30-5-generic x86_64

** Affects: pulseaudio (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug

-- 
Crackling audio, especially from DVDs [karmic regression]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376374
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 376374] Re: Crackling audio, especially from DVDs [karmic regression]

2009-05-14 Thread Max Bowsher

** Attachment added: "AlsaDevices.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26706179/AlsaDevices.txt

** Attachment added: "AplayDevices.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26706180/AplayDevices.txt

** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26706182/BootDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "Card0.Amixer.values.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26706183/Card0.Amixer.values.txt

** Attachment added: "Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26706184/Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt

** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26706185/CurrentDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26706186/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: "PciMultimedia.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26706187/PciMultimedia.txt

-- 
Crackling audio, especially from DVDs [karmic regression]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376374
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 376374] Re: Crackling audio, especially from DVDs [karmic regression]

2009-05-14 Thread Max Bowsher
I confirm that resample-method=ffmpeg in Karmic is a great improvement,
approximately on a par with the quality of src-linear in Jaunty.

-- 
Crackling audio, especially from DVDs [karmic regression]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376374
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 320632] Re: tap-to-click and edge-scrolling broken in Jaunty

2009-01-27 Thread Max Bowsher
Using 0.99.3-2ubuntu1 on an Acer Aspire One, something truly bizarre is
happening.

Immediately after login, edge-scroll works. Shortly after login, edge-
scroll stops working. When this happens, 'xinput list-props' and
'synclient -l' *DISAGREE* about the position of the right edge of the
touchpad!? - see here:

m...@aao:~$ synclient -l | head -5
Parameter settings:
LeftEdge= 1632
RightEdge   = 6143
TopEdge = 1575
BottomEdge  = 4281
m...@aao:~$ xinput list-props 5 | head -3
Device 'SynPS/2 Synaptics TouchPad':
Device Enabled (109):   1
Synaptics Edges (255):  1632, 5312, 1575, 4281

Using 'synclient' to reset the RightEdge value to what 'xinput list-
props' shows throughout *re-enables* edge scrolling for a while.
After a minute or so, edge scrolling breaks again, and inspecting the
RightEdge value with 'synclient -l' shows that it has mysteriously
reverted to the broken value, apparently spontaneously !?

I will attach the full 'xinput list-props' output for both 0.15.2 and
0.99.3, though I have summarized the interesting bit above, AFAICS.

-- 
tap-to-click and edge-scrolling broken in Jaunty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/320632
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 320632] Re: tap-to-click and edge-scrolling broken in Jaunty

2009-01-27 Thread Max Bowsher

** Attachment added: "list-props-0.15.2.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21694998/list-props-0.15.2.txt

-- 
tap-to-click and edge-scrolling broken in Jaunty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/320632
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 320632] Re: tap-to-click and edge-scrolling broken in Jaunty

2009-01-27 Thread Max Bowsher

** Attachment added: "list-props-0.99.3.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21695008/list-props-0.99.3.txt

-- 
tap-to-click and edge-scrolling broken in Jaunty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/320632
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 320632] Re: tap-to-click and edge-scrolling broken in Jaunty

2009-01-27 Thread Max Bowsher

** Attachment added: "list-props-0.99.3.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21695014/list-props-0.99.3.txt

-- 
tap-to-click and edge-scrolling broken in Jaunty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/320632
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 312499] Re: gnome-power-manager makes X eat up all cpu

2009-01-27 Thread Max Bowsher
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 307306 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307306

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 307306
   upgrade to 2:1.2.99.2-0ubuntu1 makes session utterly slow

-- 
gnome-power-manager makes X eat up all cpu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/312499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs



[Bug 307306] Re: upgrade to 2:1.2.99.2-0ubuntu1 makes session utterly slow

2009-01-27 Thread Max Bowsher
Some additional information on my problems reported in comment 33:
(which, to recap, are that gnome-power-manager still stimulates Xorg
into using excessive CPU with the patches applied, but not as excessive
as without them, and that the CPU usage stops after a while)

I turned off autostart of g-p-m in gnome-session-properties and instead
ran it manually as 'gnome-power-manager --no-daemon --verbose' so that I
could capture its logging. I am attaching the result. Of particular
relevance, note that in the logs there is a gap of 2 minutes 26 seconds
in the log timestamps at line 86 of the file - it is during this
interval that the CPU usage is occurring. If the log output is anything
to judge by, it looks like g-p-m may be blocked waiting on Xorg during
this time. Once this situation unblocks, a HUGE quantity of various
gpm_brightness_xrandr_* calls are logged.

** Attachment added: "gnome-power-manager.log"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21698068/gnome-power-manager.log

-- 
upgrade to 2:1.2.99.2-0ubuntu1 makes session utterly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307306
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 307306] Re: upgrade to 2:1.2.99.2-0ubuntu1 makes session utterly slow

2009-01-28 Thread Max Bowsher
Reversing automated action of Launchpad Janitor, as per my previous
comments the patch improves but does not fully fix the problem with
gnome-power-manager

** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Released => In Progress

-- 
upgrade to 2:1.2.99.2-0ubuntu1 makes session utterly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307306
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 322571] [NEW] intrepid->jaunty, linux-doc-2.6.27 not replaced with linux-doc-2.6.28

2009-01-28 Thread Max Bowsher
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: update-manager

In my intrepid->jaunty upgrade, linux-doc-2.6.27 was not remove and
replaced with linux-doc-2.6.28 as should happen. I am attaching relevant
logfiles.

** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
intrepid->jaunty, linux-doc-2.6.27 not replaced with linux-doc-2.6.28
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322571
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 322571] Re: intrepid->jaunty, linux-doc-2.6.27 not replaced with linux-doc-2.6.28

2009-01-28 Thread Max Bowsher

** Attachment added: "apt.log"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21751732/apt.log

-- 
intrepid->jaunty, linux-doc-2.6.27 not replaced with linux-doc-2.6.28
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322571
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 322571] Re: intrepid->jaunty, linux-doc-2.6.27 not replaced with linux-doc-2.6.28

2009-01-28 Thread Max Bowsher

** Attachment added: "apt-term.log"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21751744/apt-term.log

-- 
intrepid->jaunty, linux-doc-2.6.27 not replaced with linux-doc-2.6.28
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322571
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 322571] Re: intrepid->jaunty, linux-doc-2.6.27 not replaced with linux-doc-2.6.28

2009-01-28 Thread Max Bowsher

** Attachment added: "main.log"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21751757/main.log

-- 
intrepid->jaunty, linux-doc-2.6.27 not replaced with linux-doc-2.6.28
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322571
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 322571] Re: intrepid->jaunty, linux-doc-2.6.27 not replaced with linux-doc-2.6.28

2009-01-28 Thread Max Bowsher
The issue may be "reproduced" by downgrading linux-doc to the intrepid-
updates version, and installing intrepid-updates' linux-doc-2.6.27,
(removing linux-doc-2.6.28), and then running "update-manager --dist-
upgrade".

The GUI reports that there are no available updates. /var/log/dist-
upgrade/apt.log show relevant apt messages.

-- 
intrepid->jaunty, linux-doc-2.6.27 not replaced with linux-doc-2.6.28
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322571
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 321533] Re: Please sync pidgin-libnotify 0.14-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main).

2009-01-29 Thread Max Bowsher
** Summary changed:

- [Sync request]pidgin-libnotify
+ Please sync pidgin-libnotify 0.14-1 (universe) from Debian experimental 
(main).

-- 
Please sync pidgin-libnotify 0.14-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/321533
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 321533] Re: Please sync pidgin-libnotify 0.14-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main).

2009-01-29 Thread Max Bowsher
** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: pidgin-libnotify
  
  Please sync pidgin-libnotify (0.14-1) from Debian experimental.
+ 
+ New changelog entries in Debian:
+ pidgin-libnotify  (0.14-1) experimental; urgency=low
+ 
+* New upstream release
+* Bump up Standards-Version: 3.8.0.
+ 
+  -- Torsten Werner   Sun, 28 Dec 2008 17:52:00 +0100
  
  Ubuntu changes all incorporated in Debian:
   * 01-only_available.patch: Changed in the original source
   * 02-fix_show_button.patch: Patch which does the same provided in Debian
  It builds cleanly in pbuilder, and I can confirm it installs and works under 
Jaunty.
  
  Here are the release notes for 0.14:
  * really add option: don't show notifications when absent
  * Updated polish translation (Piotr Drąg)
  * Added russian translation (Dmitry Egorkin)
  * Added bulgarian translation (Dilyan Palauzov)
  * Added german translation (Marc Mikolits)
  * Added swedish translation (Jonas Granqvist)

-- 
Please sync pidgin-libnotify 0.14-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/321533
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 307306] Re: upgrade to 2:1.2.99.2-0ubuntu1 makes session utterly slow

2009-01-29 Thread Max Bowsher
I am reopening the task against gnome-desktop, as in my case, on the
Acer Aspire One, the current 1:2.25.5-0ubuntu1 does _not_ fix the
problem. I require additionally Peter Clifton's workaround from comment
23, a.k.a.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=126905&action=view, or the
Xorg CPU usage pegs at 50% (100% of one core) and remains there, with
killing gnome-power-manager _not_ being a solution in this case.

** Changed in: gnome-desktop (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Released => In Progress

-- 
upgrade to 2:1.2.99.2-0ubuntu1 makes session utterly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307306
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 307306] Re: upgrade to 2:1.2.99.2-0ubuntu1 makes session utterly slow

2009-01-30 Thread Max Bowsher
No, killing gnome-settings-daemon does not affect the CPU usage level,
as mentioned in comment 33 above.

-- 
upgrade to 2:1.2.99.2-0ubuntu1 makes session utterly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307306
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 386699] Re: Mistakes external USB flash disk for system-internal disk

2009-06-16 Thread Max Bowsher
Attached.

** Attachment added: "dump.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28004984/dump.txt

-- 
Mistakes external USB flash disk for system-internal disk
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/386699
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 289087] Re: Missing linux-image-debug packages and metapackages since Intrepid

2009-06-16 Thread Max Bowsher
Regardless of whether this bug eventually ends up as "Won't Fix" or not,
I don't think it's valid to set it as such on the basis of the mail
quoted above. That mail concerns how to build the debug packages
locally, not why they are no longer in the archive.

Looking through the kernel-team mail archives, I found this thread:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2009-March/004570.html

which demonstrates that the rationale for no longer publishing debug
packages in the archive and the validity of not doing so is unresolved.

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Won't Fix => Confirmed

-- 
Missing linux-image-debug packages and metapackages since Intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289087
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 386699] Re: Mistakes external USB flash disk for system-internal disk

2009-06-17 Thread Max Bowsher
Confirmed:

$ devkit-disks --mount /dev/sdb1
Mounted /org/freedesktop/DeviceKit/Disks/devices/sdb1 at /media/49DC-AFA8

works, no password prompt.

-- 
Mistakes external USB flash disk for system-internal disk
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/386699
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 388372] [NEW] Result of "Leave a message" has UI warts

2009-06-17 Thread Max Bowsher
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gnome-screensaver

The result of gnome-screensaver's "Leave a message" has multiple UI
warts.

1) OK and Cancel buttons, which both simply dismiss the dialog.

2) No indication what the dialog is actually telling you. If the person
leaving the message was not especially verbose, it's quite inexplicable
why the dialog is appearing, unless you're already aware of the feature.
It should begin the dialog with something along the lines of "At 
a person left a message for you via the screensaver:".

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
Date: Wed Jun 17 11:02:33 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: gnome-screensaver 2.27.0-0ubuntu1
ProcEnviron:
 LC_COLLATE=C
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.30-9.10-generic
SourcePackage: gnome-screensaver
Uname: Linux 2.6.30-9-generic x86_64

** Affects: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug

-- 
Result of "Leave a message" has UI warts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/388372
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 388372] Re: Result of "Leave a message" has UI warts

2009-06-17 Thread Max Bowsher

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28019805/Dependencies.txt

-- 
Result of "Leave a message" has UI warts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/388372
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 272938] Re: [intrepid] 'leave message' messages do not use selected time format

2009-06-17 Thread Max Bowsher
Furthermore, it doesn't tell you the *date*. I could have been on
holiday or something.

-- 
[intrepid] 'leave message' messages do not use selected time format
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272938
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 357365] Re: Keybindings consisting completely of modifier keys no longer work

2009-06-20 Thread Max Bowsher
Seems to be fixed in Karmic.

** Changed in: libx11 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
Keybindings consisting completely of modifier keys no longer work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357365
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 391052] [NEW] screen should not depend on byobu

2009-06-23 Thread Max Bowsher
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: screen

Today, screen in karmic was made to depend on byobu, as a hack to deal
with some transitional issue. Please don't do this, screen does not
depend on byobu, so the screen package should not compel me to have
byobu installed. The transitional issues need to be solved in a way
which doesn't introduce erroneous dependencies.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Jun 23 11:14:45 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: screen 4.0.3-13ubuntu1
ProcEnviron:
 LC_COLLATE=C
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.30-9.10-generic
SourcePackage: screen
Uname: Linux 2.6.30-9-generic x86_64

** Affects: screen (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug

-- 
screen should not depend on byobu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391052
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 391052] Re: screen should not depend on byobu

2009-06-23 Thread Max Bowsher

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28241714/Dependencies.txt

-- 
screen should not depend on byobu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391052
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 391057] Re: package makedumpfile ... failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite directory `/bin' ... with nondirectory - broken package contains file as "/bin"

2009-06-23 Thread Max Bowsher

** Attachment added: "AptOrdering.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28242004/AptOrdering.txt

** Attachment added: "Dmesg.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28242008/Dmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.gz"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28242009/DpkgTerminalLog.gz

-- 
package makedumpfile ... failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite 
directory `/bin' ... with nondirectory - broken package contains file as "/bin"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391057
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 391057] [NEW] package makedumpfile ... failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite directory `/bin' ... with nondirectory - broken package contains file as "/bin"

2009-06-23 Thread Max Bowsher
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: makedumpfile

$ dpkg --fsys-tarfile .../makedumpfile_1.3.3-0ubuntu2_amd64.deb | tar -tv
...
-rwxr-xr-x root/root  4947 2009-06-23 08:42 ./bin

Package is severely broken - I suspect a missing mkdir in the
installation commands, causing executables to be written as a file named
"/bin" directly, rather than inside the directory.

ProblemType: Package
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Jun 23 11:26:34 2009
Dependencies:
 
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite directory `/bin' in package libpam-foreground 
with nondirectory
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: makedumpfile 1.2.9-0ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.30-9.10-generic
SourcePackage: makedumpfile
Title: package makedumpfile 1.2.9-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: trying to 
overwrite directory `/bin' in package libpam-foreground with nondirectory
Uname: Linux 2.6.30-9-generic x86_64

** Affects: makedumpfile (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package

-- 
package makedumpfile ... failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite 
directory `/bin' ... with nondirectory - broken package contains file as "/bin"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391057
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 391057] Re: package makedumpfile ... failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite directory `/bin' ... with nondirectory - broken package contains file as "/bin"

2009-06-23 Thread Max Bowsher
Fixed by 1.3.3-0ubuntu3


** Changed in: makedumpfile (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
package makedumpfile ... failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite 
directory `/bin' ... with nondirectory - broken package contains file as "/bin"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391057
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 384469] Re: constantly polls floppy drive

2009-06-23 Thread Max Bowsher
I've installed the packages from the ubuntu-desktop PPA, but the bug is
still present.

-- 
constantly polls floppy drive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384469
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 391513] [NEW] sleep '0.1' Invalid number - initramfs sleep no longer supports non-integer sleep times

2009-06-24 Thread Max Bowsher
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: initramfs-tools

Recently, I think with initramfs-tools 0.92bubuntu32, which notes a
change of commandline tools from klibc utilities to busybox, I notice
many messages declaring that sleep finds '0.1' to be an invalid number
during early boot.

Sure enough, grepping /usr/share/initramfs-tools/ reveals a couple of
'/bin/sleep 0.1' invocations.

It looks like the busybox sleep only supports sleeping for integer
numbers of seconds.

** Affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
sleep '0.1' Invalid number - initramfs sleep no longer supports non-integer 
sleep times
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391513
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 391527] [NEW] usplash broken by KMS

2009-06-24 Thread Max Bowsher
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: usplash

Hardware: Acer Aspire One, Intel 945GME graphics.

When using KMS, usplash breaks - it displays the initial screen (ubuntu
logo plus 0% progress bar) but no motion of the progress bar, nor
display of messages happens. Additionally, in this locked up state,
Alt+Fx keys fail to change VT. The boot proceeds normally underneath
this, and usplash dies correctly when gdm takes over. Disabling KMS
(i915.modeset=0) makes usplash work.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
Date: Wed Jun 24 09:39:24 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
MachineType: Acer AOA150
Package: usplash 0.5.32
ProcCmdLine: root=UUID=2c1bed4c-e0ef-433f-a439-cd43a5c43748 ro splash 
i915.modeset=0
ProcEnviron:
 LC_COLLATE=C
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.30-10.12-generic
SourcePackage: usplash
Uname: Linux 2.6.30-10-generic i686
UsplashConf:
 # Usplash configuration file
 # These parameters will only apply after running update-initramfs.
 
 xres=1024
 yres=600
dmi.bios.date: 10/06/2008
dmi.bios.vendor: Acer
dmi.bios.version: v0.3308
dmi.board.asset.tag: Base Board Asset Tag
dmi.board.vendor: Acer
dmi.board.version: Base Board Version
dmi.chassis.type: 1
dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacturer
dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAcer:bvrv0.3308:bd10/06/2008:svnAcer:pnAOA150:pvr1:rvnAcer:rn:rvrBaseBoardVersion:cvnChassisManufacturer:ct1:cvrChassisVersion:
dmi.product.name: AOA150
dmi.product.version: 1
dmi.sys.vendor: Acer

** Affects: usplash (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386

-- 
usplash broken by KMS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391527
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 391527] Re: usplash broken by KMS

2009-06-24 Thread Max Bowsher

** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28275014/BootDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28275015/CurrentDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28275016/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28275017/Lspci.txt

** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28275018/Lsusb.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28275019/ProcCpuinfo.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28275020/ProcInterrupts.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28275021/ProcModules.txt

** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28275022/UdevDb.txt

** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28275023/UdevLog.txt

-- 
usplash broken by KMS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391527
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 391789] [NEW] mesa 7.4.1-1ubuntu3 crasher regression

2009-06-24 Thread Max Bowsher
Public bug reported:

Installing the mesa 7.4.1-1ubuntu3 packages makes X crash for me
reliably when opening and then closing a right-click menu, or clicking
on a panel application launcher.

Acer Aspire One
Intel 945GME

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
Date: Wed Jun 24 20:25:27 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
MachineType: Acer AOA150
Package: mesa-utils 7.4.1-1ubuntu2
ProcCmdLine: root=UUID=2c1bed4c-e0ef-433f-a439-cd43a5c43748 ro
ProcEnviron:
 LC_COLLATE=C
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.30-10.12-generic
RelatedPackageVersions:
 xserver-xorg 1:7.4~5ubuntu21
 libgl1-mesa-glx 7.4.1-1ubuntu2
 libdrm2 2.4.11-0ubuntu1
 xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.7.99.1+git20090602.ec2fde7c-0ubuntu2
 xserver-xorg-video-ati N/A
SourcePackage: mesa
Uname: Linux 2.6.30-10-generic i686
XorgConf:
 Section "ServerFlags"
Option "DontZap" "false"
Option "XkbModel" "pc105"
Option "XkbLayout" "gb"
 EndSection
dmi.bios.date: 10/06/2008
dmi.bios.vendor: Acer
dmi.bios.version: v0.3308
dmi.board.asset.tag: Base Board Asset Tag
dmi.board.vendor: Acer
dmi.board.version: Base Board Version
dmi.chassis.type: 1
dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacturer
dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAcer:bvrv0.3308:bd10/06/2008:svnAcer:pnAOA150:pvr1:rvnAcer:rn:rvrBaseBoardVersion:cvnChassisManufacturer:ct1:cvrChassisVersion:
dmi.product.name: AOA150
dmi.product.version: 1
dmi.sys.vendor: Acer
fglrx: Not loaded
system:
 distro: Ubuntu
 architecture:   i686kernel: 2.6.30-10-generic

** Affects: mesa (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386

-- 
mesa 7.4.1-1ubuntu3 crasher regression
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391789
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 391789] Re: mesa 7.4.1-1ubuntu3 crasher regression

2009-06-24 Thread Max Bowsher

** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28299306/BootDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28299307/CurrentDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28299308/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: "GdmLog.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28299309/GdmLog.txt

** Attachment added: "GdmLogOld.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28299310/GdmLogOld.txt

** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28299312/Lspci.txt

** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28299313/Lsusb.txt

** Attachment added: "PciDisplay.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28299314/PciDisplay.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28299315/ProcCpuinfo.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28299316/ProcInterrupts.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28299318/ProcModules.txt

** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28299319/UdevDb.txt

** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28299320/UdevLog.txt

** Attachment added: "XorgLog.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28299321/XorgLog.txt

** Attachment added: "XorgLogOld.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28299322/XorgLogOld.txt

** Attachment added: "Xrandr.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28299323/Xrandr.txt

** Attachment added: "glxinfo.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28299324/glxinfo.txt

** Attachment added: "setxkbmap.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28299325/setxkbmap.txt

** Attachment added: "xdpyinfo.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28299326/xdpyinfo.txt

** Attachment added: "xkbcomp.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28299327/xkbcomp.txt

-- 
mesa 7.4.1-1ubuntu3 crasher regression
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391789
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 391789] Re: mesa 7.4.1-1ubuntu3 crasher regression

2009-06-24 Thread Max Bowsher
Forgot to say, rolling back to -1ubuntu2 fixes the problem.

-- 
mesa 7.4.1-1ubuntu3 crasher regression
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391789
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 383396] Re: X crashes when screensaver activates

2009-06-03 Thread Max Bowsher
Confirmed. Also reassigning to xserver-xorg-video-intel package. Rolling
that back to 2.7.1 avoids the problem.

Like Rodney, I also have Intel 915 graphics hardware.

** Package changed: xorg (Ubuntu) => xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)

** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
X crashes when screensaver activates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383396
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 384304] [NEW] devicekit-power fails to realize I'm on battery

2009-06-06 Thread Max Bowsher
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: devicekit-power

Since upgrading to gnome-power-manager 2.27.1-0ubuntu2, which IIUC
switched backends from hal to devkit-power, g-p-m thinks I'm always on
AC, and doesn't even acknowledge the fact I have a battery. Rolling back
to g-p-m 2.26.1-0ubuntu4 results in correct behaviour.

I'll post some attachments with various debugging info...

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
Date: Sat Jun  6 16:50:59 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
Package: devicekit-power 008-1
ProcEnviron:
 LC_COLLATE=C
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.30-8.9-generic
SourcePackage: devicekit-power
Uname: Linux 2.6.30-8-generic i686

** Affects: devicekit-power (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386

-- 
devicekit-power fails to realize I'm on battery
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384304
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 384304] Re: devicekit-power fails to realize I'm on battery

2009-06-06 Thread Max Bowsher

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27585852/Dependencies.txt

-- 
devicekit-power fails to realize I'm on battery
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384304
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 384304] Re: devicekit-power fails to realize I'm on battery

2009-06-06 Thread Max Bowsher
"devkit-power -d" output - despite what it says, I'm actually on battery
at the time.

** Attachment added: "devkit-power-d.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27585944/devkit-power-d.txt

-- 
devicekit-power fails to realize I'm on battery
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384304
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 384304] Re: devicekit-power fails to realize I'm on battery

2009-06-06 Thread Max Bowsher
Tarball of /var/lib/DeviceKit-power/, just in case it's helpful.

** Attachment added: "var-lib-DeviceKit-power.tar.bz2"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27586140/var-lib-DeviceKit-power.tar.bz2

-- 
devicekit-power fails to realize I'm on battery
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384304
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 384304] Re: devicekit-power fails to realize I'm on battery

2009-06-06 Thread Max Bowsher
The bug seems to be only reproduceable when devkit-power-daemon starts
up whilst that battery is fully charged. Here is the output of running
it in the foreground with -v, with the battery fully charged to start
with, then pulling the plug - and it still thinks I'm on AC.

** Attachment added: "dkp.log"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27587656/dkp.log

-- 
devicekit-power fails to realize I'm on battery
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384304
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 384316] [NEW] "radeon" driver now depends on "ati" to be autoloaded, previously it did not

2009-06-06 Thread Max Bowsher
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-ati

Prior to 1:6.12.2-2ubuntu1, I had only xserver-xorg-video-radeon
installed, *without* xserver-xorg-video-ati. This used to work fine.  As
of that version, X now fails to load the driver unless the -ati wrapper
is present. This is probably related to pci ids no longer being shipped
in the -radeon package.   Either X should learn the necessary pci ids to
load radeon directly, or the radeon package should depend on ati if
that's necessary for it to ever be properly autoloaded.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat Jun  6 17:45:40 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
MachineType: LENOVO 0674KSG
Package: xserver-xorg-video-radeon 1:6.12.2-2ubuntu1
ProcCmdLine: root=UUID=57eb71e0-dd7f-48b8-86a1-1cf6593fd188 ro
ProcEnviron:
 LC_COLLATE=C
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.30-8.9-generic
RelatedPackageVersions:
 xserver-xorg 1:7.4~5ubuntu21
 libgl1-mesa-glx 7.4.1-1ubuntu1
 libdrm2 2.4.11-0ubuntu1
 xserver-xorg-video-intel N/A
 xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.12.2-2ubuntu1
SourcePackage: xserver-xorg-video-ati
Uname: Linux 2.6.30-8-generic x86_64
dmi.bios.date: 06/03/2008
dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.bios.version: 7FETA7WW (2.25 )
dmi.board.name: 0674KSG
dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.board.version: Not Available
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.chassis.version: Not Available
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvr7FETA7WW(2.25):bd06/03/2008:svnLENOVO:pn0674KSG:pvrThinkPadZ61p:rvnLENOVO:rn0674KSG:rvrNotAvailable:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNotAvailable:
dmi.product.name: 0674KSG
dmi.product.version: ThinkPad Z61p
dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO
fglrx: Not loaded
system:
 distro: Ubuntu
 architecture:   x86_64kernel: 2.6.30-8-generic

** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug

-- 
"radeon" driver now depends on "ati" to be autoloaded, previously it did not
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384316
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 384316] Re: "radeon" driver now depends on "ati" to be autoloaded, previously it did not

2009-06-06 Thread Max Bowsher

** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27587937/BootDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27587938/CurrentDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27587939/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: "GdmLog.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27587940/GdmLog.txt

** Attachment added: "GdmLogOld.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27587941/GdmLogOld.txt

** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27587942/Lspci.txt

** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27587943/Lsusb.txt

** Attachment added: "PciDisplay.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27587944/PciDisplay.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27587946/ProcCpuinfo.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27587947/ProcInterrupts.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27587948/ProcModules.txt

** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27587949/UdevDb.txt

** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27587950/UdevLog.txt

** Attachment added: "XorgConf.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27587951/XorgConf.txt

** Attachment added: "XorgLog.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27587952/XorgLog.txt

** Attachment added: "XorgLogOld.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27587953/XorgLogOld.txt

** Attachment added: "Xrandr.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27587954/Xrandr.txt

** Attachment added: "glxinfo.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27587955/glxinfo.txt

** Attachment added: "setxkbmap.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27587956/setxkbmap.txt

** Attachment added: "xdpyinfo.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27587957/xdpyinfo.txt

** Attachment added: "xkbcomp.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27587958/xkbcomp.txt

-- 
"radeon" driver now depends on "ati" to be autoloaded, previously it did not
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384316
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 384715] Re: subversion 1.5.6 built without ra_dav

2009-06-08 Thread Max Bowsher
I suggest adding --disable-neon-version-check to the configure
invocation for now, to instruct Subversion that it doesn't need to be
*that* obsessive about which versions of neon it will use.

-- 
subversion 1.5.6 built without ra_dav
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384715
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 374162] Re: Please remove screen-profiles from karmic (renamed to byobu)

2009-06-12 Thread Max Bowsher
Hi, it seems screen-profiles has now re-entered Karmic by way of sync
from Debian. Therefore reopening removal bug as it presumably needs to
be re-removed and sync-blacklisted.

** Changed in: screen-profiles (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Released => New

-- 
Please remove screen-profiles from karmic (renamed to byobu)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374162
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 224110] Re: /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/bin/java: error while loading shared libraries: libjli.so: cannot openshared object file: No such file or directory - /proc/self/exe fullpath error on stac

2009-06-13 Thread Max Bowsher
Hi Amy,

I'm assuming you assigned this bug to yourself erroneously, and am
reverting the change. If that is not the case, please be sure to leave
an explanatory comment when assigning a bug.

** Changed in: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: amygalloway89 (amy-731) => (unassigned)

-- 
/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/bin/java: error while  loading shared libraries: 
libjli.so: cannot openshared object file:  No such file or directory - 
/proc/self/exe fullpath error on stackable filesystem
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224110
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 386699] Re: Mistakes external USB flash disk for system-internal disk

2009-06-13 Thread Max Bowsher

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27867201/Dependencies.txt

-- 
Mistakes external USB flash disk for system-internal disk
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/386699
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 386699] [NEW] Mistakes external USB flash disk for system-internal disk

2009-06-13 Thread Max Bowsher
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: devicekit-disks

On my ThinkPad Z61p, on plugging in a USB flash disk, I now get a prompt
requesting authentication to authorize mounting a *system-internal*
device.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat Jun 13 13:19:48 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
Package: devicekit-disks 004-1
ProcEnviron:
 LC_COLLATE=C
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.30-8.9-generic
SourcePackage: devicekit-disks
Uname: Linux 2.6.30-8-generic x86_64

** Affects: devicekit-disks (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug

-- 
Mistakes external USB flash disk for system-internal disk
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/386699
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 378391] Re: Source rename clobbered local changes (so tapping not working in Karmic)

2009-06-16 Thread Max Bowsher
Tapping is *currently* disabled by default in Karmic, it will be enabled
again once wgrant uploads the fixes he has already prepared. In the
meantime, you might use the package in my PPA, which is just the one
from wgrant's PPA merged with the recent sync from Debian.

-- 
Source rename clobbered local changes (so tapping not working in Karmic)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/378391
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 375618] Re: does not pass xkb* settings to xorg server

2009-06-30 Thread Max Bowsher
** Also affects: xorg (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
does not pass xkb* settings to xorg server
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375618
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 375618] Re: does not pass xkb* settings to xorg server

2009-06-30 Thread Max Bowsher
Bug reintroduced by fdi file being moved from hal to xorg, but the
version introduced in xorg is an old version still affected by this bug.

-- 
does not pass xkb* settings to xorg server
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375618
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 393939] Re: package xserver-xorg 1:7.4~5ubuntu21 failed to install/upgrade: intentando sobreescribir `/usr/lib/hal/debian-setup-keyboard', que est? tambi?n en el paquete hal

2009-06-30 Thread Max Bowsher
"The new xserver does (did) not overtake the old settings from hal."

This is bug 375618, for which a fix is in progress.

-- 
package xserver-xorg 1:7.4~5ubuntu21 failed to install/upgrade: intentando 
sobreescribir `/usr/lib/hal/debian-setup-keyboard', que est? tambi?n en el 
paquete hal
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393939
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 377395] Re: [karmic] software RAID not assembled at boot - blkid hangs using 100% CPU

2009-06-01 Thread Max Bowsher
I find this bug to be fixed in util-linux 2.15.1~rc1-1ubuntu1 - marking
as such. If anyone has further problems, please reopen or file separate
new bugs, as appropriate.

** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

-- 
[karmic] software RAID not assembled at boot - blkid hangs using 100% CPU
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377395
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 318375] Re: linux-image-debug-2.6.27-7-generic missing from repos and ddeb

2009-06-01 Thread Max Bowsher
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 289087 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289087

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 289087
   Intrepid: missing linux-image-debug for 2.6.27?

-- 
linux-image-debug-2.6.27-7-generic missing from repos and ddeb
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318375
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 289087] Re: Missing linux-image-debug packages and metapackages since Intrepid

2009-06-01 Thread Max Bowsher
** Summary changed:

- Intrepid: missing linux-image-debug for 2.6.27?
+ Missing linux-image-debug packages and metapackages since Intrepid

-- 
Missing linux-image-debug packages and metapackages since Intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289087
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 253904] Re: does not build a lot of metapackages any more

2009-06-01 Thread Max Bowsher
Sean,

It's very easy to overlook comments on a closed bug - it's not a good
way to report continuing problems.

The primary concern of this bug - the missing metapackages - is indeed
fixed.

Please follow bug 289087 concerning the missing debug packages.

-- 
does not build a lot of metapackages any more
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253904
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 289087] Re: Intrepid: missing linux-image-debug for 2.6.27?

2009-06-01 Thread Max Bowsher
During the Intrepid cycle, the 'linux' source package ceased to build
explicit debug .debs. These were apparently "replaced" by ddebs -
however, http://ddebs.ubuntu.com/pool/main/l/linux/ seems to be
consistently carrying only ddebs for the current *development* release,
thus leaving users of Intrepid and Jaunty stable releases without a
feature that was offered in Hardy and previous.

This should ideally be fixed - if it's not going to be, then at least
some explanation for removing this facility needs to be published.

-- 
Missing linux-image-debug packages and metapackages since Intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289087
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 375306] Re: package linphone 3.1.1-2 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/usr/share/pixmaps/linphone/linphone2.xpm', which is also in package linphone-common

2009-06-02 Thread Max Bowsher
Fixed by sync of 3.1.2-2

** Changed in: linphone (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
package linphone 3.1.1-2 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite 
`/usr/share/pixmaps/linphone/linphone2.xpm', which is also in package 
linphone-common
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375306
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 379203] Re: touchpad tap-to-click doesn't works after update to karmic from jaunty

2009-05-22 Thread Max Bowsher
This is almost certainly related to the following entry in xserver-xorg-
input-synaptics' debian/NEWS file:

xserver-xorg-input-synaptics (1.1.1~git20090510-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * Tapping has been disabled by default on many touchpads by upstream, see
the "NOTES" section in the synaptics(4) manpage for a short overview
about how defaults are calculated.
If you want to re-enable it, you can do so from within the X
environment by running the following commands in a terminal:

$ synclient TapButton1=1
$ synclient TapButton2=2
$ synclient TapButton3=3

Note that the configuration will not be permanently modified, to do
so assign the above option values in your xorg.conf or custom fdi file
(see the synaptics(4) manpage or the documents in
/usr/share/doc/xserver-xorg-input-synaptics for additional details).
Another alternative is to use desktop environment specific tools
like gpointing-device-settings or touchfreeze.

 -- David Nusinow   Sat, 11 Apr 2009 16:23:11 -0400

-- 
touchpad tap-to-click doesn't works after update to karmic from jaunty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/379203
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 379745] [NEW] WARNING: Failed to parse default value `sound-juicer -d %d' for schema (/schemas/desktop/gnome/volume_manager/autoplay_cda)

2009-05-23 Thread Max Bowsher
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gnome-volume-manager

Preparing to replace gnome-volume-manager 2.24.1-2ubuntu1 (using 
.../gnome-volume-manager_2.24.1-3ubuntu1_amd64.deb) ...
WARNING: Failed to parse default value `sound-juicer -d %d' for schema 
(/schemas/desktop/gnome/volume_manager/autoplay_cda)
Unpacking replacement gnome-volume-manager ...
Processing triggers for desktop-file-utils ...
Processing triggers for man-db ...
Setting up gnome-volume-manager (2.24.1-3ubuntu1) ...
WARNING: Failed to parse default value `sound-juicer -d %d' for schema 
(/schemas/desktop/gnome/volume_manager/autoplay_cda)

^ In above dpkg log, warning suggests something is broken

** Affects: gnome-volume-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
WARNING: Failed to parse default value `sound-juicer -d %d' for schema 
(/schemas/desktop/gnome/volume_manager/autoplay_cda)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/379745
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 380426] Re: package alsa-base 1.0.19.dfsg-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 2

2009-05-25 Thread Max Bowsher
Confirming. The preinst script of alsa-base 1.0.20+dfsg-1ubuntu1 is a
bit of a brown-paper-bag oops.

It contains an erroneous backslash in the shebang line, and an
unresolved merge conflict marker!

** Changed in: alsa-driver (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
package alsa-base 1.0.19.dfsg-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess 
pre-installation script returned error exit status 2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/380426
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 365352] Re: setup.py install --prefix=/usr/local installs modules in site-packages/ directory

2009-05-26 Thread Max Bowsher
Matthias, are you sure this behaviour is intentional, and if so, by what
rationale? It seems plain wrong.

For that matter, why is --install-layout=deb not the default when using
a deb-packaged python executable?

-- 
setup.py install --prefix=/usr/local installs modules in site-packages/ 
directory
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365352
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 380749] Re: laptop touchpad does not register single/double/triple click

2009-05-26 Thread Max Bowsher
Please could you verify whether executing the following commands restores 
tapping functionality for that X session:
$ synclient TapButton1=1
$ synclient TapButton2=2
$ synclient TapButton3=3

If so, then you are experiencing bug 378391 - though I can't imagine why
a custom kernel would avoid the problem.

-- 
laptop touchpad does not register single/double/triple click
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/380749
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 391398] Re: Applications segfault with gtk+ version 2.17.2 when selecting listbox values

2009-07-01 Thread Max Bowsher
I'm seeing segfaults in Eclipse (non-Ubuntu-packaged) when opening
comboboxes, at /build/buildd/gtk+2.0-2.17.2/gtk/gtkcombobox.c:1703 -
this is in cell_view_is_sensitive(GtkCellView *cell_view) whilst trying
to iterate the result of gtk_cell_view_get_cell_renderers(cell_view)

-- 
Applications segfault with gtk+ version 2.17.2 when selecting listbox values
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391398
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 225733] Re: last line of info dir appears blank

2009-07-02 Thread Max Bowsher
Hi Reuben,

I can't reproduce this bug - perhaps it's dependent on the actual
content of the directory node?

Please could you check whether you are still affected by the bug, and
attach your /usr/share/info/dir or /usr/share/info/dir.gz file
(whichever exists, both if both do).


** Changed in: texinfo (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
last line of info dir appears blank
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225733
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 394808] [NEW] info reader now chokes on tab characters in info files

2009-07-02 Thread Max Bowsher
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: texinfo

I was attempting to view "info bash" and "info readline", and noticed
that the menu items are missing from the display.

Upon investigation, it appears that the info reader now chokes on files
containing a tab character, ignoring all remaining content up to the
next start-of-node marker.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
Date: Thu Jul  2 18:05:30 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: info 4.13a.dfsg.1-4
ProcEnviron:
 LC_COLLATE=C
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.30-10.12-generic
SourcePackage: texinfo
Uname: Linux 2.6.30-10-generic x86_64

** Affects: texinfo (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug

-- 
info reader now chokes on tab characters in info files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/394808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 394808] Re: info reader now chokes on tab characters in info files

2009-07-02 Thread Max Bowsher

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28634164/Dependencies.txt

-- 
info reader now chokes on tab characters in info files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/394808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 395299] Re: gdm 2.26 has no graphical configuration tool

2009-07-03 Thread Max Bowsher
** Summary changed:

- Login Window Preferences missing
+ gdm 2.26 has no graphical configuration tool

** Tags added: regression-potential

-- 
gdm 2.26 has no graphical configuration tool
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395299
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 395281] Re: gdm 2.26 criteria for which users shown in greeter list are bad

2009-07-03 Thread Max Bowsher
** Summary changed:

- kernoops user is listed as real user in gdm 2.26.x
+ gdm 2.26 criteria for which users shown in greeter list are bad

-- 
gdm 2.26 criteria for which users shown in greeter list are bad
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395281
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 395281] Re: kernoops user is listed as real user in gdm 2.26.x

2009-07-03 Thread Max Bowsher
On one of my machines, the only interactive user is *not* displayed in
the selection box. It sounds as if the criteria for user filtering need
to be refined in both directions.

-- 
gdm 2.26 criteria for which users shown in greeter list are bad
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395281
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 395313] Re: gdm 2.26 kills or switches away from active X sessions on upgrading

2009-07-03 Thread Max Bowsher

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28670406/Dependencies.txt

-- 
gdm 2.26 kills or switches away from active X sessions on upgrading
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395313
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 395313] [NEW] gdm 2.26 kills or switches away from active X sessions on upgrading

2009-07-03 Thread Max Bowsher
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gdm

On upgrading from gdm 2.20 to 2.26, I was ejected from my X session, but
on logging in, was returned to the same session.

On upgrading from gdm 2.26.1-0ubuntu1 to -0ubuntu2, my X session was
killed outright.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
Date: Fri Jul  3 21:15:14 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: gdm 2.26.1-0ubuntu2
ProcEnviron:
 LC_COLLATE=C
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-1.14-generic
SourcePackage: gdm
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-1-generic x86_64

** Affects: gdm (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Confirmed


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug

-- 
gdm 2.26 kills or switches away from active X sessions on upgrading
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395313
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 395314] [NEW] gdm 2.26 appears on wrong monitor

2009-07-03 Thread Max Bowsher
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gdm

I have two monitors, using nVidia TwinView.

gdm 2.20 appeared on my primary monitor

gdm 2.26 appears on my secondary monitor

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
Date: Fri Jul  3 21:19:02 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: gdm 2.26.1-0ubuntu2
ProcEnviron:
 LC_COLLATE=C
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-1.14-generic
SourcePackage: gdm
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-1-generic x86_64

** Affects: gdm (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug

-- 
gdm 2.26 appears on wrong monitor
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395314
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 395314] Re: gdm 2.26 appears on wrong monitor

2009-07-03 Thread Max Bowsher

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28670447/Dependencies.txt

-- 
gdm 2.26 appears on wrong monitor
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395314
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 395281] Re: gdm 2.26 criteria for which users shown in greeter list are bad

2009-07-03 Thread Max Bowsher
It appears that the reason I saw no users was because some consolekit
related thing was taking lots of time to process, blocking the list
population. On a second boot, the list initially appeared unpopulated,
but was populated with relevant users after about 5 seconds. (Point of
interest: ck-history was still running and consuming lots of CPU for
several seconds *after* login.)

-- 
gdm 2.26 criteria for which users shown in greeter list are bad
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395281
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 395314] Re: gdm 2.26 appears on wrong monitor

2009-07-03 Thread Max Bowsher
Empirically is seems that gdm 2.26 is appearing on whichever monitor
contains the mouse pointer, which in my case at bootup seems to be one
pixel right of centre, putting it just onto my secondary monitor. I
assume gdm 2.20 tried to pick the primary monitor.

-- 
gdm 2.26 appears on wrong monitor
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395314
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 395324] [NEW] 'These windows do not support "save current setup"....' metacity warning when logging in with gdm 2.26

2009-07-03 Thread Max Bowsher
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gdm

When I log in through the new gdm, there is a spurious alert from
metacity that gdm-simple-greeter does not support "save current setup".

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
Date: Fri Jul  3 21:59:29 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: gdm 2.26.1-0ubuntu2
ProcEnviron:
 LC_COLLATE=C
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-1.14-generic
SourcePackage: gdm
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-1-generic x86_64

** Affects: gdm (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug

-- 
'These windows do not support "save current setup"' metacity warning when 
logging in with gdm 2.26
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395324
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 395324] Re: 'These windows do not support "save current setup"....' metacity warning when logging in with gdm 2.26

2009-07-03 Thread Max Bowsher

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28671158/Dependencies.txt

-- 
'These windows do not support "save current setup"' metacity warning when 
logging in with gdm 2.26
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395324
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 386699] Re: Mistakes external USB flash disk for system-internal disk

2009-07-03 Thread Max Bowsher
Yes, still a problem for me on completely updated current karmic.

** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Confirmed

-- 
Mistakes external USB flash disk for system-internal disk
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/386699
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 386699] Re: Mistakes external USB flash disk for system-internal disk

2009-07-03 Thread Max Bowsher
Possibly related in the general sense of misdetecting media attributes -
I'm offered in the desktop right click menu the choices to "Unmount"
(good) or "Eject" (insane!) my usb flash disk.

Though the mental image of my usb stick being forcibly ejected from the
side of my computer is amusing :-)

-- 
Mistakes external USB flash disk for system-internal disk
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/386699
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 395313] Re: gdm 2.26 kills or switches away from active X sessions on upgrading

2009-07-03 Thread Max Bowsher
For my gdm 2.20 to 2.26 upgrade I'm not sure - my experience was that I
was taken from my X session to a new-style gdm, and on logging in, back
to my previous X session.

For my gdm 2.26.1-0ubuntu1 to -0ubuntu2 upgrade, it definitely killed my
session outright.

-- 
gdm 2.26 kills or switches away from active X sessions on upgrading
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395313
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 395313] Re: gdm 2.26 kills or switches away from active X sessions on upgrading

2009-07-04 Thread Max Bowsher
OK, I just upgraded another machine from gdm 2.20 to 2.26, and can
confirm that for that upgrade, the new gdm is erroneously started on vt8
/ X screen :1 whilst the previous session remains happily alive on vt7 /
:0.

I am attaching apt-term.log from that upgrade - in particular I find it
suspicious that there is first an attempt to reload gdm, which fails,
followed by an attempt to start gdm afresh, with is presumably
responsible for the extra spurious gdm.

** Attachment added: "apt-term.log"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28685927/apt-term.log

-- 
gdm 2.26 kills or switches away from active X sessions on upgrading
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395313
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 395362] Re: unittest is broken

2009-07-04 Thread Max Bowsher
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 389942 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389942

Hi Xavier,

As you note in your bug description, there is already a bug filed for
this issue. Therefore, I'm marking this bug as a duplicate, and will
open a python2.6 task on the parent bug.

I will not open a python-defaults task on the parent bug because I see
no reason why python-defaults is involved.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 389942
   python-nose is broken in Karmic alpha 2

-- 
unittest is broken
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395362
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 389942] Re: python-nose is broken in Karmic alpha 2

2009-07-04 Thread Max Bowsher
NB that the change mentioned above is an upstream one.

The problem is in essence that an upstream change to unittest reveals a
bug in how nose overrides TestProgram.runTests.

I shall file a bug upstream.


** Summary changed:

- python-nose is broken in Karmic alpha 2
+ python-nose is broken with python 2.6.3-dev

-- 
python-nose is broken with python 2.6.3-dev
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389942
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 389942] Re: python-nose is broken with python 2.6.3-dev

2009-07-04 Thread Max Bowsher
http://code.google.com/p/python-nose/issues/detail?id=276 filed

** Bug watch added: code.google.com/p/python-nose/issues #276
   http://code.google.com/p/python-nose/issues/detail?id=276

-- 
python-nose is broken with python 2.6.3-dev
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389942
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 395362] Re: unittest is broken

2009-07-04 Thread Max Bowsher
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 389942 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389942

> Why is unittest.py patched by python2.6_2.6.2-0ubuntu2.diff this way?

I advise reading the changelog and/or examining the package in more
detail. You will see it is a change taken from upstream svn.
Therefore...

> Will this patch on unittest.py part of python2.6.3 ?

Yes.

> unittest.py comes from python2.6 that is why I have opened this bug
> (but maybe it is not good practice. Please tell me).

Generally, one problem == one bug. Launchpad bugs can have multiple
bugtasks applying to different packages.

> Should python-nose try to accomadate with this patch ?

Yes, see bug 389942 for more.

-- 
unittest is broken
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395362
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >