[Bug 1810517] Re: re-enable GhostScript in ImageMagick
** Information type changed from Public to Public Security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1810517 Title: re-enable GhostScript in ImageMagick To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/imagemagick/+bug/1810517/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1810517] Re: re-enable GhostScript in ImageMagick
Although the security vulnerability in GhostScript that led to this restriction on converting to and from PostScript and PDF has been addressed in version 9.24, this restriction remains in place in at least Ubuntu and Gentoo, and an attempt to remove it in Gentoo has been stopped, apparently out of an abundance of caution: https://bugs.gentoo.org/716674. Perhaps the Ubuntu Security Team could investigate and weigh in? It looks like a problem for them. The vulnerability concerned the execution of code embedded in PostScript and PDF files when they are read in, for instance after they are uploaded to a web server configured to process them with GhostScript (directly or indirectly, as in the use case where they are converted to image files through ImageMagick). If still unsafe to lift this restriction, perhaps writing to PostScript and PDF could be allowed (using rights="write" in /etc/ImageMagick-6/policy.xml), as the vulnerability only concerned reading, if I understand correctly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1810517 Title: re-enable GhostScript in ImageMagick To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/imagemagick/+bug/1810517/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1810517] Re: re-enable GhostScript in ImageMagick
Thanks for the context! It makes sense. Can someone with adequate rights please mark this as Won't Fix, to close the report? Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1810517 Title: re-enable GhostScript in ImageMagick To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/imagemagick/+bug/1810517/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1758545] Re: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Uncorrected (Non-Fatal), type=Transaction Layer
I can also report the same behavior, on a Clevo laptop running Ubuntu 20.04 (development version), kernel 5.3.0-24. Clevo does not currently provide BIOS updates for this model, and it is unlikely that they ever will. The error is as reported by the OP, and repeats several times per second on the standard error, which makes it impossible to use virtual consoles and terminals: [timestamp] pcieport :00:1d.4: AER: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Uncorrected (Non-Fatal), type=Transaction Layer, (Requester ID) [timestamp] pcieport :00:1d.4: AER: device [8086:9db4] error status/mask=0010/0001 [timestamp] pcieport :00:1d.4: AER:[20] UnsupReq (First) [timestamp] pcieport :00:1d.4: AER: TLP Header: 3400 0410 80008000 I have followed the explanation given here for a very similar PCI Express bus error: https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/369090 to give the option pci=nommconf to the kernel, in order to disable memory-mapping the configuration space of the PCI device, and instead use the original method of accessing this space through I/O ports, if I understand correctly. This option can be given at startup (press E in GRUB) and then in /etc/default/grub for subsequent boots (GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="quiet splash pci=nommconf"). The option works for me in working around the issue, and can hopefully work for other users whose hardware won't be supported with a BIOS update. >From what I understand, the problem could come from the particular PCI Express device (an Intel PCIe NVMe M.2 SSD, 760p Series, according to lshw), from the PCI Express root controller, or from the interaction between them. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1758545 Title: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Uncorrected (Non-Fatal), type=Transaction Layer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1758545/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1829497] Re: Bluetooth not work
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1832087 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1832087 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1832087 Intel WIRELESS-AC 9260 (2526:0010) Wi-Fi doesn't work on kernel > 5.0.0-16 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1829497 Title: Bluetooth not work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1829497/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1859308] [NEW] software-properties-gtk erroneously reports that Intel Wireless-AC 9260 device is not working
Public bug reported: On Ubuntu 20.04 (development branch), as of today, Additional Drivers (software-properties-gtk 0.98.6) reports that the device "Intel Corporation: Wireless-AC 9260" is not working, and suggests using a manually installed driver (cf. screenshot). However the device is working correctly: * lsmod | grep iwlwifi, lspci -v, lshw, dmesg | grep iwlwifi all show that its driver iwlwifi is in use * ls /lib/firmware/*9260* show that the appropriate firmware files are present And I am indeed writing this bug report connected to an ac (5 GHz) wifi network, where I can verify a ~130-160 Mbps download speed, so software- properties-gtk shouldn't report the device as not working and suggest manually installing a driver. Not sure why it says so? ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: software-properties-gtk 0.98.6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-9.12-generic 5.4.3 Uname: Linux 5.4.0-9-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu15 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Sun Jan 12 00:53:43 2020 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/software-properties-gtk InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-12-29 (13 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Alpha amd64 (20191226) InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python3.7 PackageArchitecture: all Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.7, Python 3.7.6, python3-minimal, 3.7.5-1ubuntu1 PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python2.7, Python 2.7.17, python-minimal, 2.7.17-1 SourcePackage: software-properties UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: software-properties (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal ** Attachment added: "Screenshot of the bug" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1859308/+attachment/5319308/+files/Screenshot%20from%202020-01-12%2000-44-43.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1859308 Title: software-properties-gtk erroneously reports that Intel Wireless-AC 9260 device is not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1859308/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1859308] Re: software-properties-gtk erroneously reports that Intel Wireless-AC 9260 device is not working
In case it is relevant, note that I am starting the kernel with the option "pci=nommconf" to work around an issue with my PCIe SSD. ** Attachment added: "dmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1859308/+attachment/5319314/+files/dmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1859308 Title: software-properties-gtk erroneously reports that Intel Wireless-AC 9260 device is not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1859308/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1859308] Re: software-properties-gtk erroneously reports that Intel Wireless-AC 9260 device is not working
** Attachment added: "*9260*.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1859308/+attachment/5319318/+files/%2A9260%2A.txt ** Description changed: On Ubuntu 20.04 (development branch), as of today, Additional Drivers (software-properties-gtk 0.98.6) reports that the device "Intel Corporation: Wireless-AC 9260" is not working, and suggests using a manually installed driver (cf. screenshot). However the device is working correctly: - * lsmod | grep iwlwifi, lspci -v, lshw, dmesg | grep iwlwifi all show - that its driver iwlwifi is in use - * ls /lib/firmware/*9260* show that the appropriate firmware files are present + * lsmod | grep iwlwifi, lspci -v, lshw, dmesg | grep iwlwifi all show + that its driver iwlwifi is in use + * ls /lib/firmware/*9260* show that the appropriate firmware files + are present And I am indeed writing this bug report connected to an ac (5 GHz) wifi network, where I can verify a ~130-160 Mbps download speed, so software- properties-gtk shouldn't report the device as not working and suggest manually installing a driver. Not sure why it says so? ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: software-properties-gtk 0.98.6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-9.12-generic 5.4.3 Uname: Linux 5.4.0-9-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu15 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Sun Jan 12 00:53:43 2020 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/software-properties-gtk InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-12-29 (13 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Alpha amd64 (20191226) InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python3.7 PackageArchitecture: all Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.7, Python 3.7.6, python3-minimal, 3.7.5-1ubuntu1 PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python2.7, Python 2.7.17, python-minimal, 2.7.17-1 SourcePackage: software-properties UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1859308 Title: software-properties-gtk erroneously reports that Intel Wireless-AC 9260 device is not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1859308/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1859308] Re: software-properties-gtk erroneously reports that Intel Wireless-AC 9260 device is not working
** Attachment added: "lshw.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1859308/+attachment/5319315/+files/lshw.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1859308 Title: software-properties-gtk erroneously reports that Intel Wireless-AC 9260 device is not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1859308/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1859308] Re: software-properties-gtk erroneously reports that Intel Wireless-AC 9260 device is not working
** Attachment added: "lspci -v.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1859308/+attachment/5319317/+files/lspci%20-v.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1859308 Title: software-properties-gtk erroneously reports that Intel Wireless-AC 9260 device is not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1859308/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1859308] Re: software-properties-gtk erroneously reports that Intel Wireless-AC 9260 device is not working
** Attachment added: "lsmod.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1859308/+attachment/5319316/+files/lsmod.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1859308 Title: software-properties-gtk erroneously reports that Intel Wireless-AC 9260 device is not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1859308/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1866565] Re: Enabling the embedded terminal plugin crashes GEdit and subsequently prevents GEdit to start b/c of missing key in GSettings schema
The bug is fixed in gedit-plugins 3.36.1, and therefore in Ubuntu 20.04 Focal Fossa which has 3.36.2 at the moment. Previous releases are not affected by this bug. ** Changed in: gedit-plugins (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866565 Title: Enabling the embedded terminal plugin crashes GEdit and subsequently prevents GEdit to start b/c of missing key in GSettings schema To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gedit-plugins/+bug/1866565/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1868409] Re: gnome-{calculator, logs, characters} snaps not removed after the equivalent APT packages are installed on 20.04, and gnome-software APT package not replaced by snap-store
Thanks for the insight Brian. I indeed rarely use the graphical update
manager. I'm starting to suspect I should manually install the snap-
store and uninstall the gnome-{calculator,logs,characters} snaps to get
in sync with the development release.
** Also affects: gnome-logs (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: gnome-characters (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868409
Title:
gnome-{calculator,logs,characters} snaps not removed after the
equivalent APT packages are installed on 20.04, and gnome-software APT
package not replaced by snap-store
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-calculator/+bug/1868409/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1730231] Re: Nautilus opens for every mediafile a seperate player when selecting a group of files and pressing Enter
** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/issues #117 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/issues/117 ** Also affects: nautilus via https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/issues/117 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1730231 Title: Nautilus opens for every mediafile a seperate player when selecting a group of files and pressing Enter To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/1730231/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1861631] Re: "The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information."
The fix was made upstream on Mar 24 [1], released as part of gnome- software 3.36 on Apr 3 [2], which was packaged for Ubuntu today Apr 6 [3]. I'd say it's just a matter of hours before it's available in the repository :) [1] https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/-/commit/bb7f58f5f88381857cd9b5dbe608e75d459873f1 [2] https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/-/commits/gnome-3-36 [3] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/473131226/gnome-software_3.36.0-0ubuntu1_source.changes ** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Invalid ** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861631 Title: "The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information." To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1861631/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1861631] Re: "The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information."
Please disregard my previous comment. Looking at the code, I realize that the maintainer packaged the upstream gnome-software "3.36.0" tag, not the "gnome-3-36" branch, which makes a lot more sense indeed. So even though the fix is made upstream, it is NOT YET released, and therefore not packaged for Ubuntu. I think this bug is stuck until upstream releases 3.36.1. ** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861631 Title: "The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information." To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1861631/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1868409] Re: [FFe] gnome-{calculator, logs, characters} snaps not removed after the equivalent APT packages are installed on 20.04, and gnome-software APT package not replaced by snap-store
Thanks a lot for the work Marcus, and Iain for reviewing, Gunnar for
translating! I look forward to try that out.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868409
Title:
[FFe] gnome-{calculator,logs,characters} snaps not removed after the
equivalent APT packages are installed on 20.04, and gnome-software APT
package not replaced by snap-store
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1868409/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1868409] Re: [FFe] gnome-{calculator, logs, characters} snaps not removed after the equivalent APT packages are installed on 20.04, and gnome-software APT package not replaced by snap-store
Just ran update-manager and can confirm that the fix works perfectly.
The gnome-{calculator,logs,characters} snaps were removed, leaving their
deb equivalents. The snap-store was installed, and the gnome-software
deb was removed.
Thanks a lot!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868409
Title:
[FFe] gnome-{calculator,logs,characters} snaps not removed after the
equivalent APT packages are installed on 20.04, and gnome-software APT
package not replaced by snap-store
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1868409/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1861631] Re: "The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information."
With the replacement of gnome-software by snap-store in 20.04, this bug is no longer apparent. Only users who manually (re-)install gnome- software will see it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861631 Title: "The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information." To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1861631/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1861631] Re: "The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information."
Hi Jonathan and Dan: > I am not sure what you mean. There is no "snap-store" deb on my > 20.04 system, nor does "apt search snap-store" yield any results. It's a snap application, which you'll see in the output of the "snap list" command if it is installed. It provides the Ubuntu Software application on 20.04 and replaces the "gnome-software" deb, cf https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/is-ubuntu-software-going-to-be-remove- for-snap-snap-store/14542 and bug 1868409. If I understand correctly, at this point in time, your system shouldn't have the "gnome-software" deb any longer unless you've manually installed it yourself, and it should have the "snap-store" snap instead. > Furthermore, this bug was initially reported about the output of > apticron showing up in cron job emails; as far as I know, apticron > is independent of gnome-software. This is unclear to me too, but Matthias Klumpp identified the cause of this error as lying with gnome-software metadata, and he fixed it upstream in gnome-software, cf comment 3 on this bug. Perhaps apticron runs apt-get update? > I have an up-to-date focal system and I am still seeing this. I don't see it any more. The plot thickens. You may still have the "gnome-software" deb? If yes, and you don't mind migrating to the "snap- store" snap for you Ubuntu Software application, then you could run the update-manager (the graphical application), it will take care of the transition, see bug 1868409 for details. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861631 Title: "The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information." To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1861631/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1872221] Re: Updates installed snap-store snap and uninstalled ubuntu-software
> Updates installed snap-store snap and uninstalled ubuntu-software This is normal behavior, unless you have manually installed the "gnome- software" package. The Ubuntu Software application on 20.04 is now provided by the "snap-store" snap instead of the "gnome-software" package. More info in https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/is-ubuntu-software- going-to-be-remove-for-snap-snap-store/14542/ and bug 1868409. > snap store app is also see thru (100% transparent) I'm not sure what you mean, but it sounds like a different bug, possibly against the display system? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872221 Title: Updates installed snap-store snap and uninstalled ubuntu-software To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1872221/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1872221] Re: Updates installed snap-store snap and uninstalled ubuntu-software
Fixed by update-manager version 1:20.04.6 in bug 1872958 ** Package changed: gnome-software (Ubuntu) => update-manager (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872221 Title: Updates installed snap-store snap and uninstalled ubuntu-software To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1872221/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1861631] Re: "The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information."
Hi Jonathan and Dan:
> I don't think either apt nor snap auto-updates will handle this.
I don't think so either, and nor will manual snap updates ("snap
refresh" command).
My assumption is that deb-to-snap and snap-to-deb transitions are
limited to development releases. It would be very surprising to have
such transitions happen once a release is out, wouldn't it? But then
again I don't know.
Canonical's Marcus Tomlinson, who implemented the special deb-to-snap
/snap-to-deb logic in update-manager to fix bug 1868409 and bug 1872958,
could tell us more, and let us know if we now need to do more than run
apt to keep our systems up-to-date. But I'm not sure how to contact him
or his team. This bug, or Launchpad in general, don't seem like the
right place, as it's not a bug. Perhaps a mailing list (which one?), the
Freenode IRC network (which channel?), Ubuntu Discourse or Ask Ubuntu
are better places for this question.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861631
Title:
"The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were
ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information."
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1861631/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1861631] Re: "The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information."
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1872258 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872258 Jonathan: Actually that sounds like a question for the update-manager developers, so I've asked it there and subscribed you to it: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update- manager/+question/690201 Matthias: Thanks for the downstream patch! It's awesome to see this fixed without having to wait for a new upstream version. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861631 Title: "The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information." To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1861631/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1877798] [NEW] The "areas" click-method doesn't work with "SynPS/2 Synaptics TouchPad" on "Clevo N141ZU" laptop
Public bug reported: I'm trying to switch from the "fingers" click-method to the "areas" click-method, because tapping with three fingers is awkward and I find that my three-fingers taps are rarely registered as such. * "fingers": single-finger tap for a click, two-finger tap for a right click, three-finger tap for a middle click * "areas": tap in the lower right corner for a right click, tap in the upper right corner for a middle click After running the following command: gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.peripherals.touchpad click-method \ "'areas'" I can verify with gsettings get... that the click-method is now "areas", however tapping in the lower/upper right corners of the touchpad does not elicit the expected right/middle clicks, whereas tapping with two fingers elicits a right click. This remains the case even after rebooting the computer. It's as if the click-method was ignored and defaulted to "fingers". I couldn't find any similar bug reports and don't know how to investigate this problem further. I assume this problem is specific to my hardware, otherwise it would have been noticed already. I attach the output of the following commands: cat /proc/bus/input/devices xinput --list xinput --list-props 13 # where 13 is the touchpad's ID Should I report this issue to upstream libinput (www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/libinput)? Or could this be something to do with GNOME instead? Using Ubuntu 20.04 with libinput 1.15.5-1 and xserver-xorg-input- libinput 0.29.0-1. ** Affects: xserver-xorg-input-libinput (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "cat /proc/bus/input/devices" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877798/+attachment/5369253/+files/devices.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877798 Title: The "areas" click-method doesn't work with "SynPS/2 Synaptics TouchPad" on "Clevo N141ZU" laptop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-input-libinput/+bug/1877798/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1877798] Re: The "areas" click-method doesn't work with "SynPS/2 Synaptics TouchPad" on "Clevo N141ZU" laptop
** Attachment added: "xinput --list-props 13" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-input-libinput/+bug/1877798/+attachment/5369255/+files/xinput--list-props13.txt ** Description changed: I'm trying to switch from the "fingers" click-method to the "areas" click-method, because tapping with three fingers is awkward and I find that my three-fingers taps are rarely registered as such. - * "fingers": single-finger tap for a click, two-finger tap for a right click, - three-finger tap for a middle click - * "areas": tap in the lower right corner for a right click, tap in the upper - right corner for a middle click + * "fingers": single-finger tap for a click, two-finger tap for a right + click, three-finger tap for a middle click + * "areas": tap in the lower right corner for a right click, tap in the + upper right corner for a middle click After running the following command: - gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.peripherals.touchpad click-method - "'areas'" + gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.peripherals.touchpad click-method \ + "'areas'" I can verify with gsettings get... that the click-method is now "areas", however tapping in the lower/upper right corners of the touchpad does not elicit the expected right/middle clicks, whereas tapping with two fingers elicits a right click. This remains the case even after rebooting the computer. It's as if the click-method was ignored and defaulted to "fingers". I couldn't find any similar bug reports and don't know how to investigate this problem further. I assume this problem is specific to my hardware, otherwise it would have been noticed already. I attach the output of the following commands: - cat /proc/bus/input/devices - xinput --list - xinput --list-props 13 # where 13 is the touchpad's ID + cat /proc/bus/input/devices + xinput --list + xinput --list-props 13 # where 13 is the touchpad's ID Should I report this issue to upstream libinput (www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/libinput)? Or could this be something to do with GNOME instead? Using Ubuntu 20.04 with libinput 1.15.5-1 and xserver-xorg-input- libinput 0.29.0-1. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877798 Title: The "areas" click-method doesn't work with "SynPS/2 Synaptics TouchPad" on "Clevo N141ZU" laptop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-input-libinput/+bug/1877798/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1877798] Re: The "areas" click-method doesn't work with "SynPS/2 Synaptics TouchPad" on "Clevo N141ZU" laptop
** Attachment added: "xinput --list" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-input-libinput/+bug/1877798/+attachment/5369254/+files/xinput--list.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877798 Title: The "areas" click-method doesn't work with "SynPS/2 Synaptics TouchPad" on "Clevo N141ZU" laptop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-input-libinput/+bug/1877798/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1847829] Re: Three finger tap to middle click stopped working
Hi Rip, > Three fingers results in a right-click now for whatever > reason. I have the appropriate settings enabled in KDE > (I haven't changed them). > > Middle click works sometimes after restarting the device > via xinput, but this is very rare. If your three-finger taps are inconsistent (sometimes registered as left clicks, sometimes as right clicks, sometimes as middle clicks), it could be related to the following upstream issues: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/libinput/libinput/-/issues/361 https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/libinput/libinput/-/issues/473 I am also affected by inconsistent three-finger taps (most often registered as right clicks) on a "SynPS/2 Synaptics TouchPad". ** Bug watch added: gitlab.freedesktop.org/libinput/libinput/-/issues #361 https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/libinput/libinput/-/issues/361 ** Bug watch added: gitlab.freedesktop.org/libinput/libinput/-/issues #473 https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/libinput/libinput/-/issues/473 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847829 Title: Three finger tap to middle click stopped working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-input-libinput/+bug/1847829/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1859308] Re: software-properties-gtk erroneously reports that certain Intel wireless adapter cards are not working
Description updated to reflect that this issue is not specific to a particular Intel wireless card. A number of different cards are concerned. ** Summary changed: - software-properties-gtk erroneously reports that Intel Wireless-AC 9260 device is not working + software-properties-gtk erroneously reports that certain Intel wireless adapter cards are not working ** Description changed: On Ubuntu 20.04 (development branch), as of today, Additional Drivers (software-properties-gtk 0.98.6) reports that the device "Intel Corporation: Wireless-AC 9260" is not working, and suggests using a manually installed driver (cf. screenshot). However the device is working correctly: * lsmod | grep iwlwifi, lspci -v, lshw, dmesg | grep iwlwifi all show that its driver iwlwifi is in use * ls /lib/firmware/*9260* show that the appropriate firmware files - are present + are present And I am indeed writing this bug report connected to an ac (5 GHz) wifi network, where I can verify a ~130-160 Mbps download speed, so software- properties-gtk shouldn't report the device as not working and suggest manually installing a driver. Not sure why it says so? + + EDIT: bug confirmed as affecting the following Intel wireless adapter + cards, and assumedly more to come: + + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 + Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 + Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7260 + Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 + Intel Wireless-AC 9260 + + Also for reference here are the specs of Intel adapter cards: + + ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark.html#@WirelessNetworking ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: software-properties-gtk 0.98.6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-9.12-generic 5.4.3 Uname: Linux 5.4.0-9-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu15 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Sun Jan 12 00:53:43 2020 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/software-properties-gtk InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-12-29 (13 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Alpha amd64 (20191226) InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python3.7 PackageArchitecture: all Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.7, Python 3.7.6, python3-minimal, 3.7.5-1ubuntu1 PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python2.7, Python 2.7.17, python-minimal, 2.7.17-1 SourcePackage: software-properties UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1859308 Title: software-properties-gtk erroneously reports that certain Intel wireless adapter cards are not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1859308/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1878109] [NEW] Certain features in the Sharing panel fail with D-Bus related messages when gnome-control-center is run over ssh -X
Public bug reported: When I run gnome-control-center (1:3.36.1-1ubuntu5) on a remote Ubuntu 20.04 host over ssh -X, trying to enable Screen Sharing (VNC) or Media Sharing in the Sharing panel (*) fails with the following D-Bus related messages on the standard error: -- (gnome-control-center:25937): sharing-cc-panel-WARNING **: 00:15:12.770: couldn't list networks: GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name org.gnome.SettingsDaemon.Sharing was not provided by any .service files (gnome-control-center:25937): sharing-cc-panel-WARNING **: 00:15:28.646: Failed to enable service vino-server: GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name org.gnome.SettingsDaemon.Sharing was not provided by any .service files (gnome-control-center:25937): sharing-cc-panel-WARNING **: 00:15:54.309: Failed to enable service rygel: GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name org.gnome.SettingsDaemon.Sharing was not provided by any .service files -- What does this mean? Can I do anything about it? A remote user, sitting in front of the remote computer, can enable Screen Sharing or Media Sharing in gnome-control-center themselves. Failure to enable only occurs over ssh -X, as far as I can tell. Looking up this error online led me down a D-Bus rabbit hole. I found many year-old StackExchange answers that recommend setting various environment variables and/or running dbus-launch to start a session bus instance of dbus-daemon, in case of D-Bus related errors. I am rather unfamiliar with D-Bus, but I can see using ps -ef | grep dbus that a session bus instance of dbus-daemon is already running. It has been started under my UID at the time of my SSH login. So I'm wary of those old resources. I have tried following their instructions though, for completeness sake, but to no avail. I can provide more information if necessary. (*) This odd situation happened when I had to provide technical support over VNC to an older user whose computer I had previously set up with SSH access. Hence why I was using ssh -X to try and enable VNC in gnome- control-center... ** Affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1878109 Title: Certain features in the Sharing panel fail with D-Bus related messages when gnome-control-center is run over ssh -X To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1878109/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1878109] Re: Certain features in the Sharing panel fail with D-Bus related messages when gnome-control-center is run over ssh -X
Here is another user reporting the same GDBus errors when trying to enable Screen Sharing on Ubuntu Server 20.04, if I understand correctly: https://askubuntu.com/questions/1238329 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1878109 Title: Certain features in the Sharing panel fail with D-Bus related messages when gnome-control-center is run over ssh -X To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1878109/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1878109] Re: Certain features in the Sharing panel fail with D-Bus related messages when gnome-control-center is run over ssh -X
** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/-/issues #999 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/-/issues/999 ** Also affects: gnome-control-center via https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/-/issues/999 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1878109 Title: Certain features in the Sharing panel fail with D-Bus related messages when gnome-control-center is run over ssh -X To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/1878109/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1878109] Re: Certain features in the Sharing panel fail with D-Bus related messages when gnome-control-center is run over ssh -X
Issue reported upstream and bug watch added -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1878109 Title: Certain features in the Sharing panel fail with D-Bus related messages when gnome-control-center is run over ssh -X To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/1878109/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1864539] Re: gnome-screenshot adds unnecessary transparent padding around window screenshots
** Summary changed: - screenshot tool inserts corrupt border area + gnome-screenshot adds unnecessary transparent padding around window screenshots -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864539 Title: gnome-screenshot adds unnecessary transparent padding around window screenshots To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screenshot/+bug/1864539/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1864539] Re: gnome-screenshot adds unnecessary transparent padding around window screenshots
** Description changed: - Screenshot tool inserts corrupt border area. + When taking a window screenshot with gnome-screenshot in 19.10 and + 20.04, a 20 to 25 pixel wide area of transparent padding (alpha) is + added around the screenshot. - This also applies to Ubuntu 20.04 daily build. + See attached screenshots, possibly with an external image viewer that + displays transparency as e.g. a checkered pattern, if your browser + doesn't. - See attached screenshot. + The expected behavior is that of 18.04: + + * If a border effect is selected, the smallest necessary amount of + transparent padding is added to accommodate the effect. + + * If no border effect is selected, no transparent padding is added (is + there even a need for an alpha channel in this case?). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.10 Package: gnome-screenshot 3.33.90-1ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.3.0-40.32-generic 5.3.18 Uname: Linux 5.3.0-40-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu8.4 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Mon Feb 24 14:45:28 2020 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-screenshot InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-10-20 (127 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.10 "Eoan Ermine" - Release amd64 (20191014) ProcEnviron: - SHELL=/bin/bash - XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= - PATH=(custom, no user) - LANG=en_US.UTF-8 + SHELL=/bin/bash + XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= + PATH=(custom, no user) + LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SourcePackage: gnome-screenshot UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Tags added: focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864539 Title: gnome-screenshot adds unnecessary transparent padding around window screenshots To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screenshot/+bug/1864539/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1864539] Re: gnome-screenshot adds unnecessary transparent padding around window screenshots
** Attachment added: "With --include-border and --border-effect=shadow" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screenshot/+bug/1864539/+attachment/5367065/+files/include-border-and-shadow-border-effect.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864539 Title: gnome-screenshot adds unnecessary transparent padding around window screenshots To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screenshot/+bug/1864539/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1864539] Re: gnome-screenshot adds unnecessary transparent padding around window screenshots
** Attachment added: "With --remove-border" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screenshot/+bug/1864539/+attachment/5367066/+files/remove-border.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864539 Title: gnome-screenshot adds unnecessary transparent padding around window screenshots To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screenshot/+bug/1864539/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1864539] Re: gnome-screenshot adds unnecessary transparent padding around window screenshots
I can confirm this bug. I have updated the bug report with more precise information, and I'm adding additional screenshots to demonstrate the issue. Additionally, I've noted that: * There is no difference between --include-border and --remove-border: the window border is included in the screenshot in any case. It may be an unrelated bug though. * The documentation (man and --help) doesn't state which of --include- border or --remove-border is the default. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864539 Title: gnome-screenshot adds unnecessary transparent padding around window screenshots To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screenshot/+bug/1864539/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1864539] Re: gnome-screenshot adds unnecessary transparent padding around window screenshots
** Attachment added: "With --include-border and --border-effect=none" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screenshot/+bug/1864539/+attachment/5367064/+files/include-border-and-no-border-effect.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864539 Title: gnome-screenshot adds unnecessary transparent padding around window screenshots To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screenshot/+bug/1864539/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1864539] Re: gnome-screenshot adds unnecessary transparent padding around window screenshots
It appears to be an upstream issue, as the only Ubuntu patches in gnome- screenshot 3.36.0 are related to: * Unity support * Disabling the possibility of taking a screenshot of a window or an area by right-clicking on gnome-screenshot's desktop icon, because this feature doesn't work in Wayland (bug 1720262) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864539 Title: gnome-screenshot adds unnecessary transparent padding around window screenshots To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screenshot/+bug/1864539/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1864539] Re: gnome-screenshot adds unnecessary transparent padding around window screenshots
Indeed! Thank you for pointing that out. I also found https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-screenshot/-/issues/82 and linked issues and merge requests, for additional context. So the option to include/remove-border is removed from the upstream GUI and so are the border effects. The CLI isn't updated yet though. Window screenshots now always include a faint shadow on all four sides of the window, and that's why there's transparent padding added all around. That's the new expected behavior. Would it make sense, and would it be possible, for the recently released 3.37.1 version of gnome-screenshot to be SRU'd into Ubuntu 19.10 and 20.04 then? With the current 3.36.0 version, it looks like border inclusion/removal and the border shadow/none effect are broken, or at least really don't work as the GUI states. ** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-screenshot/-/issues #82 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-screenshot/-/issues/82 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864539 Title: gnome-screenshot adds unnecessary transparent padding around window screenshots To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screenshot/+bug/1864539/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1685754] Re: gnome-terminal unduly forces umask=0022
Does anyone know where this bug is being tracked upstream now? GNOME has migrated from Bugzilla to GitLab, and I haven't been able to find the GitLab version of the Bugzilla bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1685754 Title: gnome-terminal unduly forces umask=0022 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gedit/+bug/1685754/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1685754] Re: gnome-terminal unduly forces umask=0022
Ah, OK, thanks. No news since 2018-08 then - I was hoping the GNOME GitLab would have something new :( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1685754 Title: gnome-terminal unduly forces umask=0022 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gedit/+bug/1685754/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1607535] Re: ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 fails to install core fonts
@Kristoffer: Assuming the package apt-transport-https is up-to-date on your computer, what you're seeing are not errors but probably the warnings mentioned in the bug's description, second-to-last paragraph. Please refer to the bug's description, and please report details here if seeing something the description doesn't mention. I'll investigate. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607535 Title: ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 fails to install core fonts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/1607535/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1620103] Re: Installation fails with realpath error
** Changed in: pepperflashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1620103 Title: Installation fails with realpath error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pepperflashplugin-nonfree/+bug/1620103/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1681679] Re: package deja-dup 34.2-0ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration
@mohan: Have you tried doing what APT suggests: reinstalling deja-dup, which is apparently "in a very bad inconsistent state" (possibly because something failed during your system update on 2017-04-11 11:02:02, although I don't know what did)? For instance, from the command line: sudo apt-get install --reinstall deja-dup You may also want to check next if there are broken dependencies: sudo apt-get check And fix any broken dependencies with: sudo apt-get install --fix-broken Before upgrading your system again: sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get dist-upgrade Also, instead of removing the battery to shutdown your laptop when it freezes, you can try switching to a virtual text console with Ctrl+Alt+F1 (or F2, F3, ..., F6). Explore the process list with commands such as "ps", "ps aux | more", "top" and kill whichever process you can identify as a cause for the freeze with "kill ", "kill -9 ", "killall ". Then go back to the graphical interface with Ctrl+Alt+F7 to check if it's unfrozen. If that fails, you can try restarting the graphical session with "sudo service lightdm restart" in a virtual text console. And if you can't even get to a virtual text console, you can try powering off your laptop by long pressing the power button instead of removing the battery. That works on many laptops. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1681679 Title: package deja-dup 34.2-0ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/deja-dup/+bug/1681679/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1641423] Re: Backup fails with message: 'Failed to execute child process "duplicity" (No such file or directory)' or 'No module named gi.repository': missing deja-dup-backend-gvfs, duplicity, and
** Summary changed: - Back up failed with message: Failed to execute child process "duplicity" (No such file or directory) + Backup fails with message: 'Failed to execute child process "duplicity" (No such file or directory)' or 'No module named gi.repository': missing deja-dup-backend-gvfs, duplicity, and/or python-gi packages -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1641423 Title: Backup fails with message: 'Failed to execute child process "duplicity" (No such file or directory)' or 'No module named gi.repository': missing deja-dup-backend-gvfs, duplicity, and/or python-gi packages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/1641423/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1685294] Re: Deja-dup won't run backup in Xubuntu 17.04
Hi Victor, you're just missing a Python module ("no module named
gi.repository"). This has been encountered before, e.g. bug 1641423. No
reason why it is sometimes missing has been found yet.
The module is provided by the python-gi package, which should have been
installed as a dependency of the deja-dup-backend-gvfs package, which
you have normally installed when you first opened Déjà-Dup's GUI (System
Settings > Backups, a.k.a. deja-dup-preferences) and clicked the Install
button at the bottom of the message informing you that additional
packages were required.
You did click that button, did you? Or was it not available?
Can you also please report which packages are installed and which ones
aren't, by running the following commands:
apt-cache policy deja-dup-backend-gvfs
apt-cache policy deja-dup-backend-cloudfiles
apt-cache policy deja-dup-backend-s3
apt-cache policy duplicity
apt-cache policy python-gi
Look for the "Installed: (none)" and "Installed: "
lines. Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1685294
Title:
Deja-dup won't run backup in Xubuntu 17.04
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/deja-dup/+bug/1685294/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1284479] Re: Flash does not work in Firefox in Ubuntu 14.04
** Changed in: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu) Assignee: Manpreet (manpreetkunnath) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: adobe-isv Status: Confirmed => Incomplete ** Changed in: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1284479 Title: Flash does not work in Firefox in Ubuntu 14.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/adobe-isv/+bug/1284479/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1284479] Re: Flash does not work in Firefox in Ubuntu 14.04
Much has changed regarding the Flash plugin and its support by Adobe and Canonical since this bug was reported. Things are better and simpler. This bug is unlikely to still be occurring, and if it were it certainly wouldn't warrant a Critical status. The Flash plugin can be installed and kept up-to-date via the flashplugin-installer package in the multiverse repository (NPAPI version) or via the adobe-flashplugin package in Canonical's partner repository (NPAPI and PPAPI versions, recommended). It is currently version 25.0. https://help.ubuntu.com/stable/ubuntu-help/net-install-flash.html I've set this old bug to expire. Please report problems here, or in another bug report, whichever is more appropriate. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1284479 Title: Flash does not work in Firefox in Ubuntu 14.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/adobe-isv/+bug/1284479/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 555316] Re: Cannot install flash player from Adobe's home page
I am setting this old bug to expire, seeing how it concerns ancient releases and how Flash plugin support has improved since it was reported. The Flash plugin can be installed and kept up-to-date via the flashplugin-installer package in the multiverse repository (NPAPI version) or via the adobe-flashplugin package in Canonical's partner repository (NPAPI and PPAPI versions, recommended). It is currently version 25.0. https://help.ubuntu.com/stable/ubuntu-help/net-install-flash.html Please report problems here, or in another bug report, whichever is more appropriate. ** Changed in: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu) Assignee: Anusha Kulkarni (anushakulkarani) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555316 Title: Cannot install flash player from Adobe's home page To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adobe-flashplugin/+bug/555316/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 727064] Re: [Natty] Strange beeping sound when viewing flash video
** Changed in: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released ** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/727064 Title: [Natty] Strange beeping sound when viewing flash video To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glibc/+bug/727064/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 238606] Re: [MASTER] Flash player doesn't work properly on Firefox 3 64bits (crash, gray square)
** Changed in: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete ** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238606 Title: [MASTER] Flash player doesn't work properly on Firefox 3 64bits (crash,gray square) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adobe-flashplugin/+bug/238606/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 238606] Re: [MASTER] Flash player doesn't work properly on Firefox 3 64bits (crash, gray square)
I am setting this old bug to expire, seeing how it concerns ancient releases of Ubuntu with antediluvian versions of Flash and Firefox. To install and keep the Flash plugin up-to-date, one can nowadays use the flashplugin-installer package in the multiverse repository (NPAPI version) or the adobe-flashplugin package in Canonical's partner repository (NPAPI and PPAPI versions, recommended). https://help.ubuntu.com/stable/ubuntu-help/net-install-flash.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238606 Title: [MASTER] Flash player doesn't work properly on Firefox 3 64bits (crash,gray square) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adobe-flashplugin/+bug/238606/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1685609] [NEW] Remove pepperflashplugin-nonfree from Ubuntu 17.10 "Artful Aardvark"
Public bug reported:
Please remove pepperflashplugin-nonfree from Ubuntu, starting from the
upcoming Ubuntu 17.10 "Artful Aardvark".
pepperflashplugin-nonfree is the only (packaged) way for Debian users to
install the PPAPI Flash plugin, but adobe-flashplugin from Canonical's
partner repository is recommended instead for Ubuntu users and installs
both the PPAPI and the NPAPI Flash plugins.
https://help.ubuntu.com/stable/ubuntu-help/net-install-flash.html
The drawback of pepperflashplugin-nonfree is that it doesn't update with
new versions of Adobe Flash, contrary to adobe-flashplugin. The user has
to run a separate update script, provided by the package, to update the
Flash plugin ("sudo update-pepperflashplugin-nonfree --install"). Most
normal Ubuntu users are not aware of this fact and never manually update
their Flash plugin, which puts them at risk of security vulnerabilities.
This has led one user to proposing a cronjob-improved version of the
package (ppa:jonathonf/pepperflashplugin-nonfree).
The advantage of pepperflashplugin-nonfree over adobe-flashplugin is
that it is in multiverse rather than in partner.
I believe that the drawback outweighs the advantage and that
pepperflashplugin-nonfree should be dropped from Ubuntu (but not from
Debian). Please discuss here if you agree or not. Also please see bug
1632870 where the idea of removing pepperflashplugin-nonfree was first
floated (comments 31, 32, 34, 40, 42, 43, 52). Thanks.
** Affects: pepperflashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: artful
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1685609
Title:
Remove pepperflashplugin-nonfree from Ubuntu 17.10 "Artful Aardvark"
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pepperflashplugin-nonfree/+bug/1685609/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1681679] Re: package deja-dup 34.2-0ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration
I'm converting this bug report to a question, as it doesn't appear to be a bug in Déjà-Dup (upstream or package), but a support request after an installation failure. Please comment and/or convert the question back to a bug if more help is needed and/or more information can be provided and/or it turns out to be a bug. ** Changed in: deja-dup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Converted to question: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/deja-dup/+question/629854 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1681679 Title: package deja-dup 34.2-0ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/deja-dup/+bug/1681679/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1657092] Re: deja-dup refers to "Files" instead of "Caja"
@Russ Phillips (or anyone using MATE): Can you confirm that "Caja" is the user-facing name of the file manager in MATE desktop environment? And by that I mean, its name in the menus. Thanks. Cause in Unity DE and Cinnamon DE, I'm quite certain that the user- facing name of Nautilus and Nemo, respectively, is "Files", even though many people refer to them by their internal names Nautilus and Nemo. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657092 Title: deja-dup refers to "Files" instead of "Caja" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/1657092/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1657092] Re: deja-dup refers to "Files" instead of "Caja"
@Russ Phillips: Don't bother, I checked by myself in the .desktop file. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657092 Title: deja-dup refers to "Files" instead of "Caja" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/1657092/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1657092] Re: deja-dup refers to "Files" instead of "Caja"
@Vej (and @Russ too): I have uploaded my (trivial) patch to an upstream branch, but haven't proposed it for merging yet. To be honest, I'm not too wild about changing the name "Files" to accommodate Caja (sorry), because of the reasons I wrote down in the branch's description: https://code.launchpad.net/~nathanael-naeri/deja-dup/fix-1657092 Vej, could you please consult with Michael, directly or on the mailing- list, to get his opinion on supporting another desktop environment and/or Nautilus fork (MATE/Caja), and potentially, supporting all DE that use Nautilus forks? Right now Déjà-Dup only officially integrates with GNOME/Nautilus and Unity/Nautilus as far as I know. If he's OK with Russ's suggestion then I'll be happy to propose for merging of course. ** Changed in: deja-dup Assignee: (unassigned) => Nathanaël Naeri (Naël) (nathanael-naeri) ** Changed in: deja-dup (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Nathanaël Naeri (Naël) (nathanael-naeri) ** Changed in: deja-dup Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: deja-dup (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657092 Title: deja-dup refers to "Files" instead of "Caja" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/1657092/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1442111] Re: Scanner is correctly identified but scan fails with "sane_start: Invalid argument" as root, and rebooting the computer sometimes makes things work, sometimes not
Yes I am marking this Invalid because the issue hasn't manifested itself since mid-2015. See comment 3 for more details. Fingers crossed that it doesn't come back. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1442111 Title: Scanner is correctly identified but scan fails with "sane_start: Invalid argument" as root, and rebooting the computer sometimes makes things work, sometimes not To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1442111/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1607535] Re: ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 fails to install core fonts
** Description changed:
[Symptoms]
When installing or updating the package ttf-mscorefonts-installer in
Ubuntu 16.04 or 16.10, an error message appears in a GUI window,
indicating "failure to download extra data files" (the fonts themselves)
"after package installation" (the package itself appears to have been
installed). This error message re-appears regularly, as a cron-job re-
tries the failed download.
If installing or updating from the command line, additional failure
information is given in an error message prefixed by "E:", but this
error message depends on the mirror server which is contacted for the
download: "404 Not Found" is common, but there is also "Protocol http
not supported or disabled in libcurl", and complains about invalid
Content-Range headers.
[Cause]
The current 3.4 version of ttf-mscorefonts-installer in Ubuntu 16.04
delegates the download of the proprietary Microsoft Core Fonts for the
Web (Andale, Arial...) to the package update-notifier, which itself
delegates it to the program apt-helper provided by the package apt. The
download URL points to the host downloads.sourceforge.net, which
redirects to a randomly-chosen mirror server
.dl.sourceforge.net.
Unfortunately, the program apt-helper has a bug in the way it treats
redirections. This bug makes apt-helper keep a space in the URL instead
of encoding it to %20 before contacting the mirror. It is more
extensively documented in bug 1655431 and bug 1651923. The mirror
replies to this malformed request with an error message (e.g. "404 Not
Found"), and download fails.
Some mirrors appear to understand the malformed request nonetheless, and
send the requested font file, however since there are 11 fonts to
download, the chances of getting 11 understanding mirrors are low. Hence
why the error message usually concerns andale32.exe or arial32.exe
instead of webdin32.exe.
[Workaround 1]
Download the fonts manually and put them all in the same directory. You
can use wget for that, because contrary to apt-helper, it handles
redirections fine (command line formatted for readability, do not
include line breaks and line indents):
$ wget http://downloads.sourceforge.net/corefonts/
{andale32.exe,arial32.exe,arialb32.exe,comic32.exe,courie32.exe,
georgi32.exe,impact32.exe,times32.exe,trebuc32.exe,verdan32.exe,
webdin32.exe}
Or you can use your browser: point it to
https://sourceforge.net/projects/corefonts/files/the%20fonts/final and
download the same files.
Make sure the package is purged and no remaining setup triggers are
remaining, using your favorite package manager or command-line APT:
$ sudo apt-get purge ttf-mscorefonts-installer
Then reinstall the package, this time pointing to the previously-
downloaded fonts in a second step:
$ sudo apt-get install ttf-mscorefonts-installer
# (this will most likely fail again)
$ sudo dpkg-reconfigure ttf-mscorefonts-installer
The second command should return a "graphical" interface in the
terminal. Use it to point to the directory where you downloaded the
fonts (/path/to/directory/containing/the/fonts). Make sure no .deb files
are in this directory, they seem to be picked up too and then it fails.
If a pop-up shows up for a post-install action later, just let it run,
it shouldn't come back. It may triggered by the file /var/lib/update-
notifier/user.d/data-downloads-failed and you may be successful in
avoiding the regularly-reappearing message by removing this file. But
this point is less clear.
Once everything is working, you can delete the downloaded fonts in .exe
format, they have been uncompressed and installed in
/usr/share/fonts/truetype/msttcorefonts in .ttf format.
Adapted from: Vincent Gerris (comment 17), Lesley Binks (comment 18).
[Workaround 2]
Remove Ubuntu's version of ttf-mscorefonts-installer and install
Debian's version instead. Indeed, Debian's version uses wget to download
the fonts, and contrary to apt-helper, wget handles redirections fine.
Download the package from https://packages.debian.org/ttf-mscorefonts-
installer. Version 3.6 has been tested by several users. This workaround
should work with Debian's version 3.4+nmu1 too, but then you'd be
prompted to update to Ubuntu's problematic version 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 next
time you update your packages.
To download the package with wget (command line formatted for
readability, do not include line break and line indent):
$ wget http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/pool/contrib/m/
msttcorefonts/ttf-mscorefonts-installer_3.6_all.deb
Purge your currently-installed Ubuntu version of the package using your
favorite package manager or command-line APT, and install the Debian
version with dpkg:
$ sudo apt-get purge ttf-mscorefonts-installer
$ sudo dpkg --install /path/to/
[Bug 1654573] Re: dowload of ttf-mscorefonts-installer failed
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1607535 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607535 @Christopher: thanks for the clarification. I have added this detail (that reinstallation is necessary) to bug 1607535's description, section [Fix]. The warnings about user _apt have been reported in a number of specific bugs. No idea what's causing this. Will have to investigate one day. ** Changed in: msttcorefonts (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Fix Released ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1607535 ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 fails to install core fonts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1654573 Title: dowload of ttf-mscorefonts-installer failed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/1654573/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1607535] Re: ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 fails to install core fonts
Sigh... The bug that never got away. Did you update apt-transport-https? Reinstalled ttf-mscorefonts-installer? Followed the instructions in section [Fix] of the bug's description? And what's the errors saying? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607535 Title: ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 fails to install core fonts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/1607535/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1607535] Re: ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 fails to install core fonts
@Tanner > "All done, no errors." Where is the error? Joke aside, the fonts are successfully downloaded and installed. The warnings (W) that you see, about the user _apt, are non-blocking. They have been reported in several other bug reports. I don't think anybody is investigating them yet. They're not on my urgent todo list either. Perhaps in the future. I'm going to update the bug's description to mention them. Thanks for reminding me about them. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607535 Title: ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 fails to install core fonts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/1607535/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1607535] Re: ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 fails to install core fonts
** Description changed:
[Symptoms]
When installing or updating the package ttf-mscorefonts-installer in
Ubuntu 16.04 or 16.10, an error message appears in a GUI window,
indicating "failure to download extra data files" (the fonts themselves)
"after package installation" (the package itself appears to have been
installed). This error message re-appears regularly, as a cron-job re-
tries the failed download.
If installing or updating from the command line, additional failure
information is given in an error message prefixed by "E:", but this
error message depends on the mirror server which is contacted for the
download: "404 Not Found" is common, but there is also "Protocol http
not supported or disabled in libcurl", and complains about invalid
Content-Range headers.
[Cause]
The current 3.4 version of ttf-mscorefonts-installer in Ubuntu 16.04
delegates the download of the proprietary Microsoft Core Fonts for the
Web (Andale, Arial...) to the package update-notifier, which itself
delegates it to the program apt-helper provided by the package apt. The
download URL points to the host downloads.sourceforge.net, which
redirects to a randomly-chosen mirror server
.dl.sourceforge.net.
Unfortunately, the program apt-helper has a bug in the way it treats
redirections. This bug makes apt-helper keep a space in the URL instead
of encoding it to %20 before contacting the mirror. It is more
extensively documented in bug 1655431 and bug 1651923. The mirror
replies to this malformed request with an error message (e.g. "404 Not
Found"), and download fails.
Some mirrors appear to understand the malformed request nonetheless, and
send the requested font file, however since there are 11 fonts to
download, the chances of getting 11 understanding mirrors are low. Hence
why the error message usually concerns andale32.exe or arial32.exe
instead of webdin32.exe.
[Workaround 1]
Download the fonts manually and put them all in the same directory. You
can use wget for that, because contrary to apt-helper, it handles
redirections fine (command line formatted for readability, do not
include line breaks and line indents):
$ wget http://downloads.sourceforge.net/corefonts/
{andale32.exe,arial32.exe,arialb32.exe,comic32.exe,courie32.exe,
georgi32.exe,impact32.exe,times32.exe,trebuc32.exe,verdan32.exe,
webdin32.exe}
Or you can use your browser: point it to
https://sourceforge.net/projects/corefonts/files/the%20fonts/final and
download the same files.
Make sure the package is purged and no remaining setup triggers are
remaining, using your favorite package manager or command-line APT:
$ sudo apt-get purge ttf-mscorefonts-installer
Then reinstall the package, this time pointing to the previously-
downloaded fonts in a second step:
$ sudo apt-get install ttf-mscorefonts-installer
# (this will most likely fail again)
$ sudo dpkg-reconfigure ttf-mscorefonts-installer
The second command should return a "graphical" interface in the
terminal. Use it to point to the directory where you downloaded the
fonts (/path/to/directory/containing/the/fonts). Make sure no .deb files
are in this directory, they seem to be picked up too and then it fails.
If a pop-up shows up for a post-install action later, just let it run,
it shouldn't come back. It may triggered by the file /var/lib/update-
notifier/user.d/data-downloads-failed and you may be successful in
avoiding the regularly-reappearing message by removing this file. But
this point is less clear.
Once everything is working, you can delete the downloaded fonts in .exe
format, they have been uncompressed and installed in
/usr/share/fonts/truetype/msttcorefonts in .ttf format.
Adapted from: Vincent Gerris (comment 17), Lesley Binks (comment 18).
[Workaround 2]
Remove Ubuntu's version of ttf-mscorefonts-installer and install
Debian's version instead. Indeed, Debian's version uses wget to download
the fonts, and contrary to apt-helper, wget handles redirections fine.
Download the package from https://packages.debian.org/ttf-mscorefonts-
installer. Version 3.6 has been tested by several users. This workaround
should work with Debian's version 3.4+nmu1 too, but then you'd be
prompted to update to Ubuntu's problematic version 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 next
time you update your packages.
To download the package with wget (command line formatted for
readability, do not include line break and line indent):
$ wget http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/pool/contrib/m/
msttcorefonts/ttf-mscorefonts-installer_3.6_all.deb
Purge your currently-installed Ubuntu version of the package using your
favorite package manager or command-line APT, and install the Debian
version with dpkg:
$ sudo apt-get purge ttf-mscorefonts-installer
$ sudo dpkg --install /path/to/
[Bug 1657092] Re: deja-dup refers to "Files" instead of "Caja"
Russ, can you please post the values of the following environment variables in MATE, I'm going to try and implement something and I'm not sure which one to use (probably the last one). You can use printenv var or echo $var to find them out. Thanks. SESSION GDMSESSION DESKTOP_SESSION XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657092 Title: deja-dup refers to "Files" instead of "Caja" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/1657092/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1657092] Re: deja-dup refers to "Files" instead of "Caja"
I wish I was knowledgeable enough to fix less trivial bugs. In the
meantime, here are two branches. Michael, which one would you like I
request a merge of?
https://code.launchpad.net/~nathanael-naeri/deja-dup/fix-1657092-a
Changes the word "Files" to "the file manager". The more accurate "a
compatible file manager" or "a supported file manager" can be considered
too.
https://code.launchpad.net/~nathanael-naeri/deja-dup/fix-1657092-b
Uses "Files" or "Caja" depending on the environment variable
XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP ("Caja" if it's MATE, "Files" if it's something else
or unset). To test in the test shell, make a first backup, and open
deja-dup-preferences as follow:
$ XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP=Unity deja-dup-preferences
$ XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP=MATE deja-dup-preferences
PS [Michael]: I don't know if Launchpad notified you, but you'll want to
read my follow-up comments on my last merge request :
https://code.launchpad.net/~nathanael-naeri/deja-
dup/fix-1549776/+merge/317042
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657092
Title:
deja-dup refers to "Files" instead of "Caja"
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/1657092/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1632870] Re: Package is broken since Google stopped shipping Flash with Chrome 54 for Linux
@Bhavani: thanks a lot! If it's easily doable to SRU in Trusty, why not? That would unbreak the package for the rest of Trusty's life. But Trusty's version of the package is 1.3 vs. Xenial/Yakkety/Zesty's 1.8.x, so the difference in versions may make it more difficult to SRU in Trusty. In which case, don't bother, this can be a Won't Fix. In any case, since there is adobe-flashplugin, we'll request removal of this package in Zesty+1, to prevent problems in future releases. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1632870 Title: Package is broken since Google stopped shipping Flash with Chrome 54 for Linux To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pepperflashplugin-nonfree/+bug/1632870/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1657092] Re: deja-dup refers to "Files" instead of "Caja"
@Michael: Sweet, thanks for merging! @Vej, C de-Avillez: It's nice to nominate this bug for Xenial and Yakkety, but I'm not sure it's really worth fixing in these series, or that it fits the SRU requirements (I would personally go with Won't Fix for the published releases). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657092 Title: deja-dup refers to "Files" instead of "Caja" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/1657092/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1450429] Re: Backups configuration duplicated folders
Not reproducible every time in my case. Sometimes the folders are listed twice, sometimes once. In both the include and exclude lists. This bug and bug 1599662 are probably duplicates indeed. Also: I cannot reproduce the bug at all on Trusty (deja-dup 30.0-0ubuntu4.1, duplicity 0.6.23-1ubuntu4.1), only when building from source (current revision 1575), and the OP reports that against Vivid (deja-dup 32.0-0ubuntu5), so perhaps check the changes introduced between these versions first. Or I could just have been lucky. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1450429 Title: Backups configuration duplicated folders To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/deja-dup/+bug/1450429/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 989750] Re: repeatedly asks for encryption password when backing up, even though "remember password" is ticked
** Changed in: deja-dup (Ubuntu) Status: Expired => Confirmed ** Tags removed: amd64 oneiric running-unity ** Tags added: xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989750 Title: repeatedly asks for encryption password when backing up, even though "remember password" is ticked To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/deja-dup/+bug/989750/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 989750] Re: repeatedly asks for encryption password when backing up, even though "remember password" is ticked
Status changed to "Confirmed" because some users are still affected, on recent Ubuntu releases. We still don't have enough information for triaging though. Everyone affected, please provide the full log when replicating the problem, not just the GPG error: $ DEJA_DUP_DEBUG=1 deja-dup --backup > deja-dup.log You may want to scrub the log of any incriminating file names or details. Also, if the log is really too large, limit it to e.g. the last 1000 lines or whatever number of lines is enough to include enough information about the issue: $ DEJA_DUP_DEBUG=1 deja-dup --backup | tail -n 1000 > deja-dup.log Also of interest may be your settings (please scrub the file of any incriminating file names or details): $ gsettings list-recursively org.gnome.DejaDup > deja-dup.gsettings And I've also found in the past that the content of Déjà-Dup's cache directory could provide valuable insight over the available backup chains: $ ls -lR .cache/deja-dup/ > deja-dup.cachedir Thanks. ** Also affects: deja-dup Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: deja-dup Status: New => Confirmed ** Also affects: duplicity Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989750 Title: repeatedly asks for encryption password when backing up, even though "remember password" is ticked To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/989750/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 989750] Re: repeatedly asks for encryption password when backing up, even though "remember password" is ticked
Added this bug to the Duplicity project, as it looks more like a bug in Duplicity than a bug in Déjà-Dup, judging from the currently available log files. Also it's worth noticing that the GPG error reported by Joseph Hedgcorth in comment 24 is not the same as the GPG error reported by Mathias Binke in comment 15, so these two reporters may encounter different issues resulting in the same GPG error code (31). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989750 Title: repeatedly asks for encryption password when backing up, even though "remember password" is ticked To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/989750/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 989750] Re: repeatedly asks for encryption password when backing up, even though "remember password" is ticked
@Joseph: When Vej wrote "the first backup", I think he meant "a full backup" (as opposed to an incremental backup), not the actual first backup of your documents. You can force a full backup by backing up to a new location, e.g. a different folder on the server/disk that you are backing up to. Don't forget to log Déjà-Dup's output in case the issue occurs. Beware that a full backup can take some time, depending on how much data you have, so when running tests, you may want to only backup a few files and folders. Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989750 Title: repeatedly asks for encryption password when backing up, even though "remember password" is ticked To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/989750/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 883742] Re: Deja Dup keeps asking for password
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 989750 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989750 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 989750 repeatedly asks for encryption password when backing up, even though "remember password" is ticked -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/883742 Title: Deja Dup keeps asking for password To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/deja-dup/+bug/883742/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 989750] Re: repeatedly asks for encryption password when backing up, even though "remember password" is ticked
Awesome, thanks for weighting in Kenneth. I've set the status to "Invalid" (not a bug) for deja-dup since the bug was in duplicity. ** No longer affects: deja-dup ** Changed in: deja-dup (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989750 Title: repeatedly asks for encryption password when backing up, even though "remember password" is ticked To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/duplicity/+bug/989750/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1607535] Re: ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 fails to install core fonts
@Greg: > 500 Bad redirection (path) > which I have not seen listed here before - is this a new issue? Possibly. I have not seen this error before either, in relation to this bug. Just to be sure, can you please make sure that there aren't any font-related partial downloads in /var/lib/update-notifier/package-data- downloads/partial/? If there are, delete them, and check that the issue you report still happens when reinstalling ttf-mscorefonts-installer: $ sudo apt-get purge ttf-mscorefonts-installer $ sudo apt-get install ttf-mscorefonts-installer This trick helped a previous user who was bothered by an error that shouldn't have occurred any longer (comments 79 to 85). If you're still stuck with the same error, your issue would possibly be a new bug that I think would be best reported against apt (source package for the binary package apt-transport-https), unless I'm mistaken: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607535 Title: ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 fails to install core fonts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/1607535/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1607535] Re: ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 fails to install core fonts
** Description changed:
[Symptoms]
When installing or updating the package ttf-mscorefonts-installer in
Ubuntu 16.04 or 16.10, an error message appears in a GUI window,
indicating "failure to download extra data files" (the fonts themselves)
"after package installation" (the package itself appears to have been
installed). This error message re-appears regularly, as a cron-job re-
tries the failed download.
If installing or updating from the command line, additional failure
information is given in an error message prefixed by "E:", but this
error message depends on the mirror server which is contacted for the
download: "404 Not Found" is common, but there is also "Protocol http
not supported or disabled in libcurl", and complains about invalid
Content-Range headers.
[Cause]
The current 3.4 version of ttf-mscorefonts-installer in Ubuntu 16.04
delegates the download of the proprietary Microsoft Core Fonts for the
Web (Andale, Arial...) to the package update-notifier, which itself
delegates it to the program apt-helper provided by the package apt. The
download URL points to the host downloads.sourceforge.net, which
redirects to a randomly-chosen mirror server
.dl.sourceforge.net.
Unfortunately, the program apt-helper has a bug in the way it treats
redirections. This bug makes apt-helper keep a space in the URL instead
of encoding it to %20 before contacting the mirror. It is more
extensively documented in bug 1655431 and bug 1651923. The mirror
replies to this malformed request with an error message (e.g. "404 Not
Found"), and download fails.
Some mirrors appear to understand the malformed request nonetheless, and
send the requested font file, however since there are 11 fonts to
download, the chances of getting 11 understanding mirrors are low. Hence
why the error message usually concerns andale32.exe or arial32.exe
instead of webdin32.exe.
[Workaround 1]
Download the fonts manually and put them all in the same directory. You
can use wget for that, because contrary to apt-helper, it handles
redirections fine (command line formatted for readability, do not
include line breaks and line indents):
$ wget http://downloads.sourceforge.net/corefonts/
{andale32.exe,arial32.exe,arialb32.exe,comic32.exe,courie32.exe,
georgi32.exe,impact32.exe,times32.exe,trebuc32.exe,verdan32.exe,
webdin32.exe}
Or you can use your browser: point it to
https://sourceforge.net/projects/corefonts/files/the%20fonts/final and
download the same files.
Make sure the package is purged and no remaining setup triggers are
remaining, using your favorite package manager or command-line APT:
$ sudo apt-get purge ttf-mscorefonts-installer
Then reinstall the package, this time pointing to the previously-
downloaded fonts in a second step:
$ sudo apt-get install ttf-mscorefonts-installer
# (this will most likely fail again)
$ sudo dpkg-reconfigure ttf-mscorefonts-installer
The second command should return a "graphical" interface in the
terminal. Use it to point to the directory where you downloaded the
fonts (/path/to/directory/containing/the/fonts). Make sure no .deb files
are in this directory, they seem to be picked up too and then it fails.
If a pop-up shows up for a post-install action later, just let it run,
it shouldn't come back. It may triggered by the file /var/lib/update-
notifier/user.d/data-downloads-failed and you may be successful in
avoiding the regularly-reappearing message by removing this file. But
this point is less clear.
Once everything is working, you can delete the downloaded fonts in .exe
format, they have been uncompressed and installed in
/usr/share/fonts/truetype/msttcorefonts in .ttf format.
Adapted from: Vincent Gerris (comment 17), Lesley Binks (comment 18).
[Workaround 2]
Remove Ubuntu's version of ttf-mscorefonts-installer and install
Debian's version instead. Indeed, Debian's version uses wget to download
the fonts, and contrary to apt-helper, wget handles redirections fine.
Download the package from https://packages.debian.org/ttf-mscorefonts-
installer. Version 3.6 has been tested by several users. This workaround
should work with Debian's version 3.4+nmu1 too, but then you'd be
prompted to update to Ubuntu's problematic version 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 next
time you update your packages.
To download the package with wget (command line formatted for
readability, do not include line break and line indent):
$ wget http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/pool/contrib/m/
msttcorefonts/ttf-mscorefonts-installer_3.6_all.deb
Purge your currently-installed Ubuntu version of the package using your
favorite package manager or command-line APT, and install the Debian
version with dpkg:
$ sudo apt-get purge ttf-mscorefonts-installer
$ sudo dpkg --install /path/to/
[Bug 1648676] Re: package ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting a removal
** Changed in: msttcorefonts (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648676 Title: package ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting a removal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/1648676/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1132736] Re: Xorg fails to start after installing the Hardware Enablement Stack due to missing symlink after purging old xserver-xorg
Still affects xorg-lts-trusty for the users of releases < Trusty LTS, but all of those releases e.g. Precise LTS are EOL now. There is therefore no point in fixing this package, it won't be installed by anybody any more. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1132736 Title: Xorg fails to start after installing the Hardware Enablement Stack due to missing symlink after purging old xserver-xorg To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1132736/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1648676] Re: package ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting a removal
I set it to incomplete because the original reporter (or anyone else affected by this problem) hasn't replied to my comment #2 requesting more information (or hasn't brought up any additional information that might help understanding the bug's cause). This is standard practice (AFAIK) and sets old bugs to expire if they are not replied to after a number of weeks in Incomplete status (2 months I think). I'm not against a Confirmed status of course. Just can't investigate more at this stage. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648676 Title: package ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting a removal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/1648676/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1132736] Re: Xorg fails to start after installing the Hardware Enablement Stack due to missing symlink after purging old xserver-xorg
Sounds right. I just assumed that there wasn't any users of releases < Trusty any more, as all those releases are EOL. But actually there may still be, indeed. Bug should stay Confirmed until Trusty itself is EOL. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1132736 Title: Xorg fails to start after installing the Hardware Enablement Stack due to missing symlink after purging old xserver-xorg To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1132736/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1648676] Re: package ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting a removal
Fair point. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648676 Title: package ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting a removal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/1648676/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1429030] Re: netboot mini.iso doesn't support UEFI boot
@Elliot, can you give more details please? I don't know how to extract files to the root of an image and obtain a new image. I'd like to try. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1429030 Title: netboot mini.iso doesn't support UEFI boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1429030/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1660556] Re: Package ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 fails to install/upgrade, is left in half-installed state, and can not be removed/reinstalled
** Changed in: msttcorefonts (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1660556 Title: Package ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 fails to install/upgrade, is left in half-installed state, and can not be removed/reinstalled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/1660556/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1663878] Re: mscorefonts-installer looks at wrong path in sourceforge
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1657567 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657567 You're getting an "invalid Content-Range header" error from the server, see bug 1607535 (description and comment 69) and bug 1657567 about that. Basically delete the downloaded fonts in /var/lib/update-notifier /package-data-downloads/partial/ and update apt-transport-https to 1.2.19 before reinstalling ttf-mscorefonts-installer. It should work. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1657567 "Content-Range: */" on non-416 responses considered invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1663878 Title: mscorefonts-installer looks at wrong path in sourceforge To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/1663878/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1658707] Re: ttf-mscorefonts-installer drop-priv warnings and download errors during install
** Changed in: msttcorefonts (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1658707 Title: ttf-mscorefonts-installer drop-priv warnings and download errors during install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/1658707/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1442111] Re: Scanner is correctly identified but scan fails with "sane_start: Invalid argument" as root, and rebooting the computer sometimes makes things work, sometimes not
Hi Christopher, thank you for resurrecting this bug report. The affected machine has since been upgraded to Xenial. It still uses the same scanner. The current versions of sane-backends and iscan are barely more recent, so one could suppose the behavior I reported in 2015-05 could still occur. However, it hasn't manifested itself since mid-2015, or I would have moved this bug report upstream to get help. Perhaps I've just been lucky. After all, this scanner isn't used very frequently and this bug doesn't show up every time. Still, my opinion is to close this bug as Invalid (can't reproduce). I'll re-open it in the future if necessary. Do you still want the apport information? OS/Kernel: Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS (GNU/Linux 4.4.0-62-generic x86_64) Scanner: Epson Stylus Office BX305FW, USB 2.0, id 0x04b8/0x0863 SANE: libsane, libsane-common, sane-utils version 1.0.25+git20150528-1ubuntu2 (up-to-date 16.04 LTS) Epson IScan: iscan_2.30.3-1, iscan-data_1.39.0-1 (latest versions, 2016-12-01) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1442111 Title: Scanner is correctly identified but scan fails with "sane_start: Invalid argument" as root, and rebooting the computer sometimes makes things work, sometimes not To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1442111/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1429030] Re: netboot mini.iso doesn't support UEFI boot
** Tags removed: utopic vivid wily ** Tags added: yakkety -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1429030 Title: netboot mini.iso doesn't support UEFI boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1429030/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1652410] Re: Undescriptive duplicity/collection-status error when the backup directory contains two volumes with different file names and same volume number in the same backup set
** Also affects: duplicity Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: duplicity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: duplicity Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: duplicity (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652410 Title: Undescriptive duplicity/collection-status error when the backup directory contains two volumes with different file names and same volume number in the same backup set To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/1652410/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1652410] Re: Undescriptive duplicity/collection-status error when the backup directory contains two volumes with different file names and same volume number in the same backup set
Added this bug to duplicity, since it is probably better suited for
resolution there than in Déjà-Dup.
Also updated the description.
** Tags removed: amd64 xenial
** Tags added: testcase
** Description changed:
- Deja-dup has never worked for me (last 5 years) always errors.
- No after a new system reinstall 16.04 I was determined to get it up and
running and learn about it's use,and perhaps recover some old data.
- Still fails with see attached text
+ [System]
- ProblemType: Bug
- DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
- Package: deja-dup 34.2-0ubuntu1.1
- ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-57.78-generic 4.4.35
- Uname: Linux 4.4.0-57-generic x86_64
- ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.4
- Architecture: amd64
- CurrentDesktop: Unity
- Date: Fri Dec 23 16:56:43 2016
- ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/deja-dup
- InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-12-02 (21 days ago)
- InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64
(20160719)
- ProcEnviron:
- PATH=(custom, user)
- SHELL=/usr/bin/fish
- LANG=en_CA.UTF-8
- LANGUAGE=en_CA:en
- XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
- SourcePackage: deja-dup
- UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
+ Ubuntu 16.04
+ deja-dup 34.2-0ubuntu1.1
+ duplicity 0.7.06-2ubuntu2
+
+ [Symptoms]
+
+ When the backup location unfortunately contains two backup volumes with
+ different file names and same volume number in the same backup set, for
+ instance:
+
+ duplicity-full.20161129T015237Z.vol1.difftar
+ duplicity-full.20161129T015237Z.vol1.difftar.gz
+
+ this confuses duplicity collection-status, which ends up returning an
+ undescriptive Python assertion error, as seen in this Déjà-Dup log file:
+
+ DUPLICITY: INFO 1
+ DUPLICITY: . Args: /usr/bin/duplicity collection-status [...]
+
+ [...]
+
+ DUPLICITY: DEBUG 1
+ DUPLICITY: . 12 files exist on backend
+
+ DUPLICITY: DEBUG 1
+ DUPLICITY: . Extracting backup chains from list of files:
+[u'duplicity-full.20161129T015237Z.vol1.difftar',
+ u'duplicity-full.20161129T015237Z.manifest',
+ u'duplicity-full.20161129T015237Z.vol1.difftar.gz',
+ u'duplicity-full-signatures.20161129T015237Z.sigtar.gz',
+ u'duplicity-full-signatures.20161129T015237Z.sigtar',
+ [...]
+
+ DUPLICITY: DEBUG 1
+ DUPLICITY: . File duplicity-full.20161129T015237Z.vol1.difftar is not
+ part of a known set; creating new set
+
+ DUPLICITY: DEBUG 1
+ DUPLICITY: . File duplicity-full.20161129T015237Z.manifest is part of
+ known set
+
+ DUPLICITY: ERROR 30 AssertionError
+ [...]
+ DUPLICITY: . File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/duplicity/collections.
+ py", line 105, in add_filename(self.volume_name_dict, filename)
+ DUPLICITY: . AssertionError:
+ ({1: 'duplicity-full.20161129T015237Z.vol1.difftar'},
+ 'duplicity-full.20161129T015237Z.vol1.difftar.gz')
+
+ What happens is that duplicity collection-status takes the uncompressed
+ duplicity-full.20161129T015237Z.vol1.difftar for the start of a backup
+ set, then tries to add the compressed duplicity-
+ full.20161129T015237Z.vol1.difftar.gz to this set, and fails because the
+ volume number of this file has already been added to the set. Otherwise
+ there would be two backup volumes with the same volume number in the
+ backup set.
+
+ Note that a similar issue may also happen for file signatures instead of
+ backup volumes, e.g.:
+
+ duplicity-full-signatures.20161129T015237Z.sigtar
+ duplicity-full-signatures.20161129T015237Z.sigtar.gz
+
+ but backup volumes appear to be tripped on first, perhaps because of
+ alphabetic order.
+
+ Note also that under normal operation, the backup location isn't
+ supposed to contain a mixed of compressed and uncompressed files (or
+ encrypted and unencrypted files), but this situation was still reported
+ by the bug reporter in the original bug report.
+
+ [Test case]
+
+ See comment 19, written for Déjà-Dup, but easily adaptable to pure
+ duplicity I think.
+
+ [Ideas for fixing]
+
+ Duplicity already has checks to avoid considering files whose names
+ don't look like they could be part of a backup set (see comment 19,
+ point 4). Perhaps this filename filter could be improved on so that
+ duplicity doesn't burp so hard when a backup volume is present in both
+ compressed and uncompressed forms? Perhaps it could have duplicity
+ prefer a particular filename when there are two volumes with the same
+ number in the same backup set? But then which one and on what grounds?
+
+ Please also see comment 23.
+
+ [Easier fix]
+
+ Worst case, if this situation can't be handled automatically and the
+ situation requires a human to examine the contents of the backup
+ repository to take adequate action, then it would be helpful that
+ duplicity return a more descriptive message than the current terse
+ assertion error.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652410
Title:
Undescrip
[Bug 1641950] Re: ubuntu-restricted-addons amd64 package should have the same Adobe Flash dependencies as the i386 package
** Tags added: bitesize packaging -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1641950 Title: ubuntu-restricted-addons amd64 package should have the same Adobe Flash dependencies as the i386 package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-restricted-addons/+bug/1641950/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1656776] Re: should depend on apt-transport-https (was: fails to download andale32.exe, spams my cron every night)
** Tags removed: amd64 xenial ** Tags added: packaging -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1656776 Title: should depend on apt-transport-https (was: fails to download andale32.exe, spams my cron every night) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/1656776/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1654573] Re: dowload of ttf-mscorefonts-installer failed
See also bug 1607535 for more details and instructions -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1654573 Title: dowload of ttf-mscorefonts-installer failed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1654573/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1442111] Re: Scanner is correctly identified but scan fails with "sane_start: Invalid argument" as root, and rebooting the computer sometimes makes things work, sometimes not
** Changed in: sane-backends (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1442111 Title: Scanner is correctly identified but scan fails with "sane_start: Invalid argument" as root, and rebooting the computer sometimes makes things work, sometimes not To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1442111/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1632870] Re: Package is broken since Google stopped shipping Flash with Chrome 54 for Linux
This bug has been fixed in pepperflashplugin-nonfree 1.8.3+nmu1 in Debian on 2017-01-14, and the fix landed in 1.8.3+nmu1ubuntu1 in Ubuntu Zesty (the current development release) on 2017-01-22. The PPAPI Flash plugin is now downloaded from Adobe rather than Google. One still has to run the provided update-pepperflashplugin-nonfree to update it from time to time. I'm marking the bug as Fix Released (in the development release). The package is still broken in the published releases: Trusty, Xenial, Yakkety. Is it worth requesting Stable Release Updates? It would qualify, since the bug comes from a web service change that makes the package stop working, and exposes the user to Flash vulnerabilities. I also still believe, like I said in comment 32, that this package offers no advantage over adobe-flashplugin, besides being in multiverse rather than in partner. Unless that last point is important (independence from Adobe/Canonical, perhaps?), dropping the package from Zesty seems more appropriate to me. If this has to be done before FeatureFreeze, there's only a couple days left. Gunnar, do you have the authority to do that? Also, did you get feedback from Chris Coulson? ** Changed in: pepperflashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1632870 Title: Package is broken since Google stopped shipping Flash with Chrome 54 for Linux To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pepperflashplugin-nonfree/+bug/1632870/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1645083] Re: pepperflash chromium plugin doesn't work
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1632870 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1632870 Bug fixed in Debian Sid and Ubuntu Zesty, pepperflashplugin-nonfree version 1.8.3+nmu1ubuntu1. See bug 1632870 comment 34. Pepperflashplugin-nonfree is still not recommended over adobe- flashplugin though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1645083 Title: pepperflash chromium plugin doesn't work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pepperflashplugin-nonfree/+bug/1645083/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1633674] Re: libpepflashplayer.so: No such file or directory
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1632870 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1632870 Bug fixed in Debian Sid and Ubuntu Zesty, pepperflashplugin-nonfree version 1.8.3+nmu1ubuntu1. See bug 1632870 comment 34. Pepperflashplugin-nonfree is still not recommended over adobe- flashplugin though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1633674 Title: libpepflashplayer.so: No such file or directory To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pepperflashplugin-nonfree/+bug/1633674/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1644551] Re: install fails because downloaded file does not match the script
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1632870 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1632870 Bug fixed in Debian Sid and Ubuntu Zesty, pepperflashplugin-nonfree version 1.8.3+nmu1ubuntu1. See bug 1632870 comment 34. Pepperflashplugin-nonfree is still not recommended over adobe- flashplugin though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644551 Title: install fails because downloaded file does not match the script To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pepperflashplugin-nonfree/+bug/1644551/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1555641] Re: flashplugin causes firefox to hang
Thanks for reporting this bug. Much has changed regarding the Flash plugin in the last few months. Adobe has started supporting the NPAPI plugin again, which is now version 24.0 compared to 11.2 when you reported this bug. So perhaps things are better now: can you please check if the current version solves your issues? The current NPAPI version (for Firefox) is in the packages flashplugin- installer and adobe-flashplugin (install either one). If you also have a PPAPI version installed (e.g. pepperflashplugin-nonfree), make sure that you don't have the package browser-plugin-freshplayer-pepperflash, otherwise Firefox will use the PPAPI version through this wrapper (which works fine too, but won't show if the bug you reported is still current). Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1555641 Title: flashplugin causes firefox to hang To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adobe-flashplugin/+bug/1555641/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
