[Bug 1341138] [NEW] package tor (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/tor', which is also in package tor-browser 3.5.4

2014-07-12 Thread Simon May
Public bug reported:

Ubuntu version: 14.04, latest updates (as of 2014-07-12)
Package version (package 'tor'): 0.2.4.20-1
Expected to happen: The tor package is installed successfully
What happened instead: Installation of package failed with message package tor 
(not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/tor', 
which is also in package tor-browser 3.5.4'. Apparently the packages 'tor' and 
'tor-browser' are in conflict.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: tor (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-30.55-generic 3.13.11.2
Uname: Linux 3.13.0-30-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.2
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat Jul 12 16:52:14 2014
DpkgTerminalLog:
 Preparing to unpack .../tor_0.2.4.20-1_amd64.deb ...
 Unpacking tor (0.2.4.20-1) ...
 dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/tor_0.2.4.20-1_amd64.deb (--unpack):
  trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/tor', which is also in package tor-browser 3.5.4
DuplicateSignature: package:tor:(not installed):trying to overwrite 
'/usr/bin/tor', which is also in package tor-browser 3.5.4
ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/tor', which is also in package 
tor-browser 3.5.4
InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-05-02 (70 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS Trusty Tahr - Release amd64 (20140417)
SourcePackage: tor
Title: package tor (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to 
overwrite '/usr/bin/tor', which is also in package tor-browser 3.5.4
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: tor (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package trusty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1341138

Title:
  package tor (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to
  overwrite '/usr/bin/tor', which is also in package tor-browser 3.5.4

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tor/+bug/1341138/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1726325] [NEW] Log-out button has no effect

2017-10-23 Thread Simon May
Public bug reported:

The extension doesn’t seem to work with Ubuntu 17.10. The log-out button
is correctly added to the shell menu, but clicking it does nothing.

1) Ubuntu release: Ubuntu 17.10 (artful)
2) Package version: 1.0.6-1
3) What you expected to happen: Clicking the log-out button which is added by 
the GNOME Shell extension (prompts to) log out the current user.
4) What happened instead: Nothing.

** Affects: gnome-shell-extension-log-out-button (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1726325

Title:
  Log-out button has no effect

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-log-out-button/+bug/1726325/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1745273] Re: Cannot open terminal with long working directory name containing Unicode characters

2018-04-30 Thread Simon May
Fixed in Ubuntu 18.04

** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1745273

Title:
  Cannot open terminal with long working directory name containing
  Unicode characters

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/1745273/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1745273] Re: Cannot open terminal with long working directory name containing Unicode characters

2018-04-30 Thread Simon May
Caused by a bash bug/crash

** Changed in: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1745273

Title:
  Cannot open terminal with long working directory name containing
  Unicode characters

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/1745273/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1745273] Re: Cannot open terminal with long working directory name containing Unicode characters

2018-04-30 Thread Simon May
Indeed, it seems to be gone/fixed in 18.04.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1745273

Title:
  Cannot open terminal with long working directory name containing
  Unicode characters

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/1745273/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1743471] [NEW] nautilus-actions-config-tool crashes with segmentation fault

2018-01-15 Thread Simon May
Public bug reported:

1) Ubuntu release: 17.10 (running Wayland session)
2) Package: nautilus-actions 3.2.3-1build5
3) When running nautilus-actions-config-tool, the Nautilus Actions 
configuration tool should be starrted.
4) Nothing (the program crashed):
$ nautilus-actions-config-tool
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

** Affects: nautilus-actions (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1743471

Title:
  nautilus-actions-config-tool crashes with segmentation fault

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus-actions/+bug/1743471/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1745273] [NEW] Cannot open gnome-terminal with long working directory name containing Unicode characters

2018-01-24 Thread Simon May
Public bug reported:

1) The release of Ubuntu you are using: Ubuntu 17.10

2) The version of the package you are using: 3.24.2-0ubuntu4

3) What you expected to happen: When opening a terminal window with a
long working directory path containing Unicode characters (such as
“/home/test/01234567890123456789/01234567890123456789/ä/01234567890123456789/01234567890123456789/01234567890123456789/01234567890123456789”
in a 80×24 window), gnome-terminal opens normally.

4) What happened instead: gnome-terminal closes immediately, both when opened 
using
gnome-terminal 
--working-directory=/home/test/01234567890123456789/01234567890123456789/ä/01234567890123456789/01234567890123456789/01234567890123456789/01234567890123456789
and when changing to this directory using “cd”. There is no output on stderr or 
anywhere else, the window just closes.

This makes it impossible to use gnome-terminal for many directories with
long paths. This did NOT happen in Ubuntu 16.04.

** Affects: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1745273

Title:
  Cannot open gnome-terminal with long working directory name containing
  Unicode characters

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1745273/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1745271] [NEW] Input prompt behaves incorrectly if working directory path spans two lines

2018-01-24 Thread Simon May
Public bug reported:

1) The release of Ubuntu you are using: Ubuntu 17.10

2) The version of the package you are using: 3.24.2-0ubuntu4

3) What you expected to happen: The input prompt should behave the same,
no matter what the working directory is.

4) What happened instead: The cursor starts overlapping the working
directory text (see attached screenshot, which shows a 80×24 terminal
window in a directory called
“/home/test/01234567890123456789/01234567890123456789/a/01234567890123456789/01234567890123456789/01234567890123456789/01234567890123456789”).

On text input, the inputted text overwrites the working directory text.
When pressing backspace, the entire second line is deleted (including
the $ character). This makes using the history (up arrow) very confusing
because afterwards, the actual input line characters do not seem to
correspond to the displayed text anymore, i.e. characters inserted at a
certain point are actually shifted in the resulting line, making it very
difficult to properly type in commands.

** Affects: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Attachment added: "Screenshot illustrating the issue"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1745271/+attachment/5042542/+files/screenshot.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1745271

Title:
  Input prompt behaves incorrectly if working directory path spans two
  lines

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1745271/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1745273] Re: Cannot open terminal with long working directory name containing Unicode characters

2018-01-25 Thread Simon May
My locale is as follows:
$ locale
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
LANGUAGE=
LC_CTYPE="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_NUMERIC=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_TIME=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_COLLATE="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_MONETARY=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_MESSAGES="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_PAPER=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_NAME=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_ADDRESS=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_TELEPHONE=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_MEASUREMENT=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_IDENTIFICATION=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_ALL=

Using “unset PROMPT_COMMAND” had no effect at all (and seems to be empty
for me, anyway?). This is pretty much a fresh install, so I’m using
Ubuntu’s default value of PS1:

$ echo "'$PS1'"
'\[\e]0;\u@\h: 
\w\a\]${debian_chroot:+($debian_chroot)}\[\033[01;32m\]\u@\h\[\033[00m\]:\[\033[01;34m\]\w\[\033[00m\]\$
 '

However, when I change that to

PS1='\[\033[01;34m\]\w\[\033[00m\]\$ '

there seems to be no more crashing. So it seems that certain values of
PS1 do indeed trigger this bug.

I have also tried the bash development version, as suggested. Even with
the default value of PS1, I haven’t been able to cause a crash there.
However, this version goes REALLY crazy with the input prompt (junk
characters, erratically printing parts of the history or working
directory path to the terminal when pressing the arrow keys, invisible
text input etc.) for long working directory paths (with or without
Unicode characters), making input all but impossible. So whatever the
difference between the two versions is, it’s not an improvement.


Anyway, thanks a lot for the help so far. Since I’m not seeing the crash in the 
newer version, I’m assuming it will be gone when Ubuntu updates (with the weird 
behavior for long paths hopefully due to different compiler flags or something 
like that). As a workaround, modifying PS1 seems to work.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1745273

Title:
  Cannot open terminal with long working directory name containing
  Unicode characters

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/1745273/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1745271] Re: Input prompt behaves incorrectly if working directory path spans two lines

2018-01-25 Thread Simon May
Nope, not happening in xterm.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1745271

Title:
  Input prompt behaves incorrectly if working directory path spans two
  lines

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1745271/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1745271] Re: Input prompt behaves incorrectly if working directory path spans two lines

2018-01-25 Thread Simon May
Oh, sorry about that. Apparently, xterm uses a different value for PS1
than gnome-terminal by default. It seems that this issue only happens
when color escape sequences are involved, which is why it didn’t happen
for me in xterm. However, when I manually set xterm to the same value as
in gnome-terminal, I also got the issue in xterm.

So, it does seem like a bash issue once again. Thanks for checking!

** Also affects: bash (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Summary changed:

- Input prompt behaves incorrectly if working directory path spans two lines
+ Input prompt behaves incorrectly if working directory path spans three lines

** Description changed:

  1) The release of Ubuntu you are using: Ubuntu 17.10
  
- 2) The version of the package you are using: 3.24.2-0ubuntu4
+ 2) The version of the package you are using: gnome-terminal version
+ 3.24.2-0ubuntu4; bash version 4.4-5ubuntu1
  
  3) What you expected to happen: The input prompt should behave the same,
  no matter what the working directory is.
  
  4) What happened instead: The cursor starts overlapping the working
  directory text (see attached screenshot, which shows a 80×24 terminal
  window in a directory called
  
“/home/test/01234567890123456789/01234567890123456789/a/01234567890123456789/01234567890123456789/01234567890123456789/01234567890123456789”).
  
  On text input, the inputted text overwrites the working directory text.
  When pressing backspace, the entire second line is deleted (including
  the $ character). This makes using the history (up arrow) very confusing
  because afterwards, the actual input line characters do not seem to
  correspond to the displayed text anymore, i.e. characters inserted at a
  certain point are actually shifted in the resulting line, making it very
  difficult to properly type in commands.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1745271

Title:
  Input prompt behaves incorrectly if working directory path spans three
  lines

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/1745271/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1745273] Re: Cannot open gnome-terminal with long working directory name containing Unicode characters

2018-01-25 Thread Simon May
When I change to that same directory in xterm, it closes just like
gnome-terminal. So it doesn’t seem to be specific to gnome-terminal, but
it DOES seem to be important that the input prompt fills more than two
lines in the terminal to trigger the bug.

I’ve tested this on my laptop, and it doesn’t happen there with the path
from the original report because this machine’s hostname is shorter, so
the input prompt is shorter as well. Using an even longer path, however,
the same happens on this machine.

The “ä” is a precomposed character. Using your command, the output is
000 c3 a4 0a
005
c3 a4 is the UTF-8 representation of the Unicode character U+00E4 LATIN SMALL 
LETTER A WITH DIAERESIS. So I’m not sure if that specific bash bug has anything 
to do with this (since there are no surrogates anywhere in my example), but 
since xterm is also affected, the cause does seem to be a lower-level component 
(bash? readline?).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1745273

Title:
  Cannot open terminal with long working directory name containing
  Unicode characters

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/1745273/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1745273] Re: Cannot open gnome-terminal with long working directory name containing Unicode characters

2018-01-25 Thread Simon May
As a quick update, it does seem to be bash that crashes – see the
following terminal session:

user@host:~$ sh
$ cd 
/home/test/01234567890123456789/01234567890123456789/ä/01234567890123456789/01234567890123456789/01234567890123456789/01234567890123456789/01234567890123456789/
$ bash
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
$

At this point, no more terminal input is possible.

** Description changed:

  1) The release of Ubuntu you are using: Ubuntu 17.10
  
- 2) The version of the package you are using: 3.24.2-0ubuntu4
+ 2) The version of the package you are using: gnome-terminal version
+ 3.24.2-0ubuntu4; bash version 4.4-5ubuntu1
  
  3) What you expected to happen: When opening a terminal window with a
  long working directory path containing Unicode characters (such as
  
“/home/test/01234567890123456789/01234567890123456789/ä/01234567890123456789/01234567890123456789/01234567890123456789/01234567890123456789”
  in a 80×24 window), gnome-terminal opens normally.
  
  4) What happened instead: gnome-terminal closes immediately, both when opened 
using
  gnome-terminal 
--working-directory=/home/test/01234567890123456789/01234567890123456789/ä/01234567890123456789/01234567890123456789/01234567890123456789/01234567890123456789
  and when changing to this directory using “cd”. There is no output on stderr 
or anywhere else, the window just closes.
  
- This makes it impossible to use gnome-terminal for many directories with
- long paths. This did NOT happen in Ubuntu 16.04.
+ It seems that gnome-terminal closes because bash crashes with a
+ segmentation fault, see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
+ terminal/+bug/1745273/comments/4.
+ 
+ This makes it impossible to use the shell for many directories with long
+ paths. This did NOT happen in Ubuntu 16.04.

** Also affects: bash (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Summary changed:

- Cannot open gnome-terminal with long working directory name containing 
Unicode characters
+ Cannot open terminal with long working directory name containing Unicode 
characters

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1745273

Title:
  Cannot open terminal with long working directory name containing
  Unicode characters

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/1745273/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1746622] [NEW] Okular snap package cannot open URLs due to AppArmor

2018-01-31 Thread Simon May
Public bug reported:

1) Ubuntu release: Ubuntu 17.10

2) Package version: Installed using “snap install okular”. “snap info okular” 
shows
snap-id: SfUqQ280Y4bJ0k64qtBKTTXq5ml46tvQ
tracking:stable
installed:   16.12.3 (3) 7MB -
refreshed:   2017-03-27 12:56:54 +0200 CEST

3) Expected behavior: Clicking a link in a PDF document opens the URL in
an appropriate program (e.g. a browser).

4) Observed behavior: When clicking the link, Okular opens a window
prompting to choose the application which should be used to open the
URL. When choosing “Applications → Url handler script”, Okular displays
the following error message:

KLauncher could not be reached via D-Bus. Error when calling 
start_service_by_desktop_path:
An AppArmor policy prevents this sender from sending this message to this 
recipient; type="method_call", sender=":1.411" (uid=1000 pid=29799 comm="okular 
/path/to/document.pdf ") interface="org.kde.KLauncher" 
member="start_service_by_desktop_path" error name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" 
destination="org.kde.klauncher5" (uid=1000 pid=32653 
comm="/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libexec/kf5/klauncher --")

** Affects: okular (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1746622

Title:
  Okular snap package cannot open URLs due to AppArmor

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/okular/+bug/1746622/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1745999] [NEW] Okular snap package cannot access files outside home directory

2018-01-29 Thread Simon May
Public bug reported:

I’m not sure where the correct place is to report issues in snap
packages, so I hope this isn’t completely wrong.

I installed okular on Ubuntu 17.10 via snap (“sudo snap install
okular”). “snap info okular” gives me the following output:


name:  okular
summary:   Universal document viewer
publisher: kde
contact:   https://www.kde.org
description: |
  Okular is a universal document viewer developed by KDE. Okular works on
  multiple platforms, including but not limited to Linux, Windows, Mac OS X,
  \*BSD, etc.
  
  Features:
  
  - Supported Formats: PDF, PS, Tiff, CHM, DjVu, Images, DVI, XPS, ODT, Fiction
  Book, Comic Book, Plucker, EPub, Fax
  - Sidebar with contents, thumbnails, reviews and bookmarks
  - Annotations support
snap-id: SfUqQ280Y4bJ0k64qtBKTTXq5ml46tvQ
commands:
  - okular
tracking:stable
installed:   16.12.3 (3) 7MB -
refreshed:   2017-03-27 12:56:54 +0200 CEST
channels:
  stable:16.12.3(3)  7MB -
  candidate: 17.04.3(5)  8MB -
  beta:  17.04.3(5)  8MB -
  edge:  master+782a5fe (27) 5MB -


The okular snap seems to use “strict” confinement and is thus unable to access 
files outside the user’s home directory even for reading. However, for a 
“viewer”-type application like okular, this is very problematic:

– When downloading a file (e.g. PDF) in a browser like Firefox and
choosing to open the file (instead of saving it somewhere in the home
directory), the browser will typically place the file in /tmp/ and then
open it using the default viewer for that file type. Since /tmp/ is
outside the user’s home directory, okular is unable to open the file.

– When opening documentation which is installed to system directories
(e.g. /usr/share/…) along with its corresponding application, okular is
likewise unable to open the documentation files for viewing. For
example, the “texdoc” program for the TeX typesetting system looks up
the documentation for a specified package (typically in PDF format) and
runs the default (PDF) viewer to show the documentation. This fails if
the okular snap application is set as the default PDF viewer.

– Any files on mounted file systems, such as external storage (USB
drives, SD cards, external hard drives…), network shares, etc., cannot
be viewed with okular.

Attempting to open any such files results in a dialog with the following
error message: “Could not open file:///path/to/file”. This does not
provide any explanation for the reason of the failure.

** Affects: kdegraphics
 Importance: Unknown
 Status: Unknown

** Affects: okular (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Bug watch added: KDE Bug Tracking System #389576
   https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389576

** Also affects: kdegraphics via
   https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389576
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1745999

Title:
  Okular snap package cannot access files outside home directory

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/kdegraphics/+bug/1745999/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1748881] [NEW] Okular exits when machine is suspended

2018-02-12 Thread Simon May
Public bug reported:

1) Ubuntu release: Ubuntu 17.10

2) Package version: okular 4:17.04.3-0ubuntu1

3) Expected behavior: When suspending while Okular is open, it should
still be open in the same state when resuming.

4) Observed behavior: There are no Okular windows after resuming.

** Affects: okular (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1748881

Title:
  Okular exits when machine is suspended

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/okular/+bug/1748881/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1800179] [NEW] Search in recent files list only works with lowercase letters

2018-10-26 Thread Simon May
Public bug reported:

When clicking “Open” and typing to search the recently opened files, any
search involving uppercase letters fails to return any result, even if
files with uppercase letters in their file names have recently been
opened. Searching for the same file names, but using all-lowercase
letters, does yield results (see attached screenshot). So it seems that
gedit converts the recently used file names to lowercase before
comparing to the search term, which is incorrect.

** Affects: gedit (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: cosmic

** Attachment added: "screenshot of the problematic behavior"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1800179/+attachment/5205885/+files/gedit_recent_search.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1800179

Title:
  Search in recent files list only works with lowercase letters

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit/+bug/1800179/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1793322] [NEW] “Domain” field missing when editing WPA2 Enterprise connection

2018-09-19 Thread Simon May
Public bug reported:

Ubuntu release: 18.04.1 LTS
Package version: gnome-control-center 1:3.28.2-0ubuntu0.18.04.2

When *adding* a WPA2 Enterprise connection, the dialog that appears is
very similar to the “Security” tab when *editing* the connection (see
the attached screenshot). However, one field from the “create
connection” dialog is conspicuously missing from the “edit connection”
dialog: the “Domain:” field! (Marked in red in the screenshot.) In other
words, it is not possible to change the domain for a WPA2 Enterprise
connection after creating it. The field should be present in both
dialogs.

** Affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: bionic

** Attachment added: "screenshot illustrating the problem"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1793322/+attachment/5190538/+files/screenshot.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1793322

Title:
  “Domain” field missing when editing WPA2 Enterprise connection

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1793322/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1793322] Re: “Domain” field missing when editing WPA2 Enterprise connection

2018-12-24 Thread Simon May
Reported at https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-
center/issues/325

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1793322

Title:
  “Domain” field missing when editing WPA2 Enterprise connection

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1793322/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1769383] Re: Ubuntu dock/launcher is shown on the lock screen

2019-01-11 Thread Simon May
I can also confirm that this issue still occurs even with the version in
-proposed. The only difference I’ve noticed with the new version is that
the text on the keyboard layout indicator sometimes disappears.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1769383

Title:
  Ubuntu dock/launcher is shown on the lock screen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1769383/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1815480] Re: “Extract Here” only creates empty files (0 bytes) for .zip files created by ownCloud

2019-02-12 Thread Simon May
Is there anything specific I should do? Just extracting the file in
Nautilus doesn’t generate any entries in journalctl.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1815480

Title:
  “Extract Here” only creates empty files (0 bytes) for .zip files
  created by ownCloud

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1815480/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1815480] [NEW] “Extract Here” only creates empty files (0 bytes) for .zip files created by ownCloud

2019-02-11 Thread Simon May
Public bug reported:

For any .zip archive generated by the ownCloud software, it seems that
extracting the files using Nautilus results in correctly-named
directories/files to be created, but all files are actually empty (0
bytes). The archive can be extracted without issues using file-roller,
unzip or 7z:

$ unzip -t test.zip
Archive:  test.zip
testing: test/OK
testing: test/f1.txt  OK
testing: test/f2.txt  OK
testing: test/f3.txt  OK
No errors detected in compressed data of test.zip.
$ unzip test
Archive:  test.zip
   creating: test/
 extracting: test/f1.txt 
 extracting: test/f2.txt 
 extracting: test/f3.txt 
$ 7z x test.zip

7-Zip [64] 16.02 : Copyright (c) 1999-2016 Igor Pavlov : 2016-05-21
p7zip Version 16.02 (locale=en_US.UTF-8,Utf16=on,HugeFiles=on,64 bits,4 CPUs 
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-5200U CPU @ 2.20GHz (306D4),ASM,AES-NI)

Scanning the drive for archives:
1 file, 8656 bytes (9 KiB)

Extracting archive: test.zip
--
Path = test.zip
Type = zip
Physical Size = 8656
64-bit = +

Everything is Ok

Folders: 1
Files: 3
Size:   7850
Compressed: 8656


Expected behavior: Download the attached file “test.zip”, right-click the file 
in Nautilus and choose “Extract Here”. A directory “test” containing three 
non-empty files “f1.txt”, “f2.txt” and “f3.txt” should be created.

Actual behavior: All three files are empty (0 bytes).

Nautilus version: 1:3.26.4-0ubuntu7.1 (cosmic)

** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: cosmic

** Attachment added: "Example .zip archive which exhibits the problem"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1815480/+attachment/5237721/+files/test.zip

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1815480

Title:
  “Extract Here” only creates empty files (0 bytes) for .zip files
  created by ownCloud

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1815480/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 156201] Re: gedit handles opening big files badly

2019-02-04 Thread Simon May
“Unfortunately nano doesn't have syntax highlighting.”

nano does have syntax highlighting!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/nano#Syntax_highlighting

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/156201

Title:
  gedit handles opening big files badly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gedit/+bug/156201/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1932159] Re: bcmwl/6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu7~20.04.2 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-08-20 Thread Simon May
Unfortunately, it seems that this update is not actually arriving on
systems because apt considers package version
6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu7~20.04.3 from focal-updates a downgrade
compared to version 6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu7, see LP: #1940722. Not
sure why that is, maybe the version should be named differently?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932159

Title:
  bcmwl/6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu7~20.04.2 ADT test failure with linux-
  hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1932159/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940722] [NEW] Package bcmwl-kernel-source version 6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu7~20.04.3 is not installed because apt thinks it’s a downgrade

2021-08-20 Thread Simon May
Public bug reported:

1) Ubuntu release: 20.04
2) Installed package version: 6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu7
3) Expectation: bcmwl-kernel-source version 6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu7~20.04.3 
was released to focal-updates to fix LP: #1932159 (building the kernel module 
with HWE kernel 5.11 on Ubuntu 20.04). The bcmwl-kernel-source package should 
be updated to the version in focal-updates.
4) Actual result: apt considers the package from focal-updates a downgrade, 
leaving the system with broken WiFi after updating to the HWE kernel.

$ apt-cache policy bcmwl-kernel-source
bcmwl-kernel-source:
  Installed: 6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu7
  Candidate: 6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu7
  Version table:
 *** 6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu7 100
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu7~20.04.3 500
500 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-updates/restricted amd64 
Packages
500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-security/restricted amd64 
Packages
 6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu5 500
500 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/restricted amd64 Packages
$ sudo apt install bcmwl-kernel-source=6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu7~20.04.3
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:
  libllvm11 libllvm11:i386 shim
Use 'sudo apt autoremove' to remove them.
The following packages will be DOWNGRADED:
  bcmwl-kernel-source
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 downgraded, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 1,546 kB of archives.
After this operation, 8,192 B of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]

** Affects: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: focal

** Description changed:

  1) Ubuntu release: 20.04
  2) Installed package version: 6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu7
- 3) Expectation: bcmwl-kernel-source version 
6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu7~20.04.3 was released to focal-updates to fix 
#1932159 (building the kernel module with HWE kernel 5.11 on Ubuntu 20.04). The 
bcmwl-kernel-source package should be updated to the version in focal-updates.
+ 3) Expectation: bcmwl-kernel-source version 
6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu7~20.04.3 was released to focal-updates to fix LP: 
#1932159 (building the kernel module with HWE kernel 5.11 on Ubuntu 20.04). The 
bcmwl-kernel-source package should be updated to the version in focal-updates.
  4) Actual result: apt considers the package from focal-updates a downgrade, 
leaving the system with broken WiFi after updating to the HWE kernel.
  
  $ apt-cache policy bcmwl-kernel-source
  bcmwl-kernel-source:
-   Installed: 6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu7
-   Candidate: 6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu7
-   Version table:
-  *** 6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu7 100
- 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
-  6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu7~20.04.3 500
- 500 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-updates/restricted 
amd64 Packages
- 500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-security/restricted amd64 
Packages
-  6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu5 500
- 500 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/restricted amd64 
Packages
+   Installed: 6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu7
+   Candidate: 6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu7
+   Version table:
+  *** 6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu7 100
+ 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
+  6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu7~20.04.3 500
+ 500 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-updates/restricted 
amd64 Packages
+ 500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-security/restricted amd64 
Packages
+  6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu5 500
+ 500 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/restricted amd64 
Packages
  $ sudo apt install bcmwl-kernel-source=6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu7~20.04.3
  Reading package lists... Done
- Building dependency tree   
+ Building dependency tree
  Reading state information... Done
  The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer 
required:
-   libllvm11 libllvm11:i386 shim
+   libllvm11 libllvm11:i386 shim
  Use 'sudo apt autoremove' to remove them.
  The following packages will be DOWNGRADED:
-   bcmwl-kernel-source
+   bcmwl-kernel-source
  0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 downgraded, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
  Need to get 1,546 kB of archives.
  After this operation, 8,192 B of additional disk space will be used.
  Do you want to continue? [Y/n]

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940722

Title:
  Package bcmwl-kernel-source version
  6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu7~20.04.3 is not installed because apt
  thinks it’s a downgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1940722/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940722] Re: Package bcmwl-kernel-source version 6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu7~20.04.3 is not installed because apt thinks it’s a downgrade

2021-08-20 Thread Simon May
This seems to have hit multiple users, see e.g. a post on Ask Ubuntu:
https://askubuntu.com/q/1356061

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940722

Title:
  Package bcmwl-kernel-source version
  6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu7~20.04.3 is not installed because apt
  thinks it’s a downgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1940722/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940417]

2021-09-13 Thread Simon-may
(In reply to simon.may from comment #28)
> In fact, it seems really strange what values for `layout.css.devPixelsPerPx` 
> trigger this – `1.22` also seems to work without issues, while other values 
> (like `1.21`) don’t.

Sorry, nevermind, `1.22` does have problems with some entries in the
bookmarks toolbar.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940417

Title:
  On Wayland toolbar menus are sometimes invisible/flickering

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1940417/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940417]

2021-09-13 Thread Simon-may
(In reply to Jani Uusitalo from comment #26)
> I can't speak for Jeroen, but I played around with the upstream builds (both 
> 92 and 91) and my faulty profile a bit and managed to isolate the trigger 
> combination for this: `MOZ_ENABLE_WAYLAND=1` and setting 
> `layout.css.devPixelsPerPx` to my preferred value of `1.2`; either resetting 
> `layout.css.devPixelsPerPx` to its default (`-1.0`), or running Firefox 
> without `MOZ_ENABLE_WAYLAND=1` will make the toolbar items work again. 
> [Here's the graphics portion of my 
> `about:support`](https://pastebin.mozilla.org/OdgM9Oox).
> 
> **So my steps to reproduce this are:**
> 1. start Firefox with `MOZ_ENABLE_WAYLAND=1`
> 2. set `layout.css.devPixelsPerPx` to `1.2`
> 3. click on the hamburger menu button
> 
> **What I expect to happen:**
> For the hamburger menu content to show.
> 
> **What happens instead:**
> The hamburger menu content flickers or doesn't show at all.

Just for reference/as a workaround: A value of `1.25` for
`layout.css.devPixelsPerPx` seems to work flawlessly for me (I was also
using `1.2` :-) ).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940417

Title:
  On Wayland toolbar menus are sometimes invisible/flickering

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1940417/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940417]

2021-09-13 Thread Simon-may
In fact, it seems really strange what values for
`layout.css.devPixelsPerPx` trigger this – `1.22` also seems to work
without issues, while other values (like `1.21`) don’t.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940417

Title:
  On Wayland toolbar menus are sometimes invisible/flickering

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1940417/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1906476] Re: PANIC at zfs_znode.c:335:zfs_znode_sa_init() // VERIFY(0 == sa_handle_get_from_db(zfsvfs->z_os, db, zp, SA_HDL_SHARED, >z_sa_hdl)) failed

2021-09-27 Thread Simon May
@#41: Dataset “rpool/ROOT/ubuntu_” sounds like bug 1894329, although
that one should have been fixed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906476

Title:
  PANIC at zfs_znode.c:335:zfs_znode_sa_init() // VERIFY(0 ==
  sa_handle_get_from_db(zfsvfs->z_os, db, zp, SA_HDL_SHARED,
  >z_sa_hdl)) failed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/zfs/+bug/1906476/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1862329] [NEW] Cannot add okular to favorites in the dock

2020-02-07 Thread Simon May via ubuntu-bugs
Public bug reported:

1) Ubuntu version: 19.10


2) Package version: okular 4:19.04.3-0ubuntu1 (APT package)


3) What you expected to happen:
When starting okular, its icon appears in the dock (as for any other program). 
When right-clicking this icon, the option “Add to Favorites” should appear, 
which allows one to pin the program to the dock so that it can be launched from 
there.


4) What happened instead:
The option “Add to Favorites” is missing for the okular icon. This can be fixed 
by adding the line

StartupWMClass=okular

to the file “/usr/share/applications/org.kde.okular.desktop”.

** Affects: okular (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862329

Title:
  Cannot add okular to favorites in the dock

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/okular/+bug/1862329/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs