the 2nd panel is wasting place in height

2009-09-10 Thread Jérôme Bouat
Hello,

The default 2nd panel is wasting place in height especially on small 
screens.

The new 13 notebooks have a DVD writer as well as a powerfull processor 
and thus need a Ubuntu desktop version instead of the netbook version.

Moreover, the new displays are mostly with a 16/10 or 16/9 aspect ratio.

Thus I think that having a uniq panel would save place in height and 
make the end user life easier.

Regards.

-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: Ubuntu Software Store: What it does, and how you can help

2009-09-10 Thread Matthew Paul Thomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Dylan McCall wrote on 01/09/09 18:15:
...
 I'm a bit concerned about using price to distinguish things here. The
 price: free thing is flawed, because it furthers the misconception
 that free software is only free in price, when in fact being free in
 price is quite irrelevant. Software with price: $20 may still be
 free as in libré, which deserves credit! Is get free software going
 to display stuff with price == 0.00, or is it going to display
 software that is _free_?

It will display stuff that is free in the sense most computer users
understand it, i.e. free as in zero price. It would be cool if the Store
could also present whether a package had a free or proprietary license,
and if it did, I would specify that it should present free licenses as
open source -- not because I particularly like that term, but because
calling them free would be unacceptably confusing.

Currently, however, there is no way for the Store to tell whether an
arbitrary package in an arbitrary repository has a free or proprietary
license. debian/copyright isn't machine-readable, and isn't included in
Packages.gz anyway. We can assume that everything in Main (except
Firefox and Thunderbird) has a free license, and that everything on
archive.canonical.com has a proprietary license, but that's about it.

It would be cool if Debian and Ubuntu packagers could work together to
address this in the Packages.gz format.

 Will this thingy be connecting to Launchpad? It would be neat to get
 linked to code, bugs and answers directly from the store :)
...

We plan to link it to Launchpad in the sense that Launchpad will store
user-submitted suggestions for improved descriptions, categories,
keywords, and screenshots/movies, as well as ratings and reviews (though
these might be submitted directly in the Store rather than in a Web
interface).

I don't see what we would gain from linking directly to Launchpad Code,
Bugs, and Answers, though. It would seem to make more sense to link to
Launchpad from the applications themselves, and launchpad-integration
already does this. And Ubuntu has too many bug reports, not too few.

Cheers
- --
Matthew Paul Thomas
http://mpt.net.nz/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkqpF+AACgkQ6PUxNfU6ecqJfACgv2lGsdy15taxFhIiCtHYdzhA
qGUAn3bkDocUenuA2uhtqOAJMZlEMK7a
=Q8Cl
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop