Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Qt 5.4 QVariant change and module news

2015-02-20 Thread Christian Dywan
This is in progress and will be on your favorite linux distro soon. :-)

On 19.02.2015 19:26, Bogdan Cuza wrote:
 I see there is a branch with unit tests that pass. Are the fixes gonna
 land soon?

  Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:19:42 +0100
  From: christian.dy...@canonical.com
  To: bogdan.c...@hotmail.com; timo.jyri...@canonical.com;
 ubuntu-ph...@lists.launchpad.net; ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
  Subject: Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Qt 5.4 QVariant change and module news
 
  I confirm that several unit tests don't pass.
 
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/u1db-qt/+bug/1423473
 
  On 18.02.2015 19:51, Bogdan Cuza wrote:
   I have just received a vivid-proposed image and noticed that U1db no
   longer loads the defaults (which was probably a processed QVariantMap
   from JS). Did this change break it/could it break even more
 components?
  
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:37:38 +0200
From: timo.jyri...@canonical.com
To: ubuntu-ph...@lists.launchpad.net
CC: ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Subject: [Ubuntu-phone] Qt 5.4 QVariant change and module news
   
Qt 5.4 is now in vivid, powering Ubuntu Phone starting with devel
image #102, Kubuntu's Plasma 5 and also the Unity 8 desktop preview.
No app changes are generally needed, but there is a change in
 QVariant
that may be relevant to C++ using apps.
   
== QVariant change in Qt 5.4 ==
   
QVariant has changed a bit in Qt 5.4, although in a way that fixing
its use does not affect negatively use in Qt 5.3 either.
   
Quote: ”When a JavaScript object/array is passed to C++ through a
QVariant, the engine no longer immediately converts the object
recursively into a QVariantMap or QVariantList but instead stores a
QJSValue in the QVariant. This prevents a loss of data when the JS
object contains non-primitive types such as function objects for
example. Code that expects the variant type to be exactly
QVariant::Map or QVariant::List may need to be adapted. Registered
conversion functions however ensure that code that merely calls
toMap() or toList() continues to work.” [QTBUG-40431]
   
Examples of fixes:
- Oxide:
   https://code.launchpad.net/~aacid/oxide/qt54_variantjs/+merge/248765
- Ubuntu UI Toolkit:
   
  
 https://code.launchpad.net/~aacid/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/statesaver_54/+merge/247986
   
Another noted small difference:
”In Qt 5.4 an alias to a null variable is correctly null instead of
undefined like it was in Qt 5.3”
   
== Status of less supported Qt modules ==
   
It's useful to remember that not all of Qt we have in Ubuntu is
supported by the Qt Project:
   
- qtlocation: Upstream releases this as part of their releases, but
they emphasize that Qt Positioning is API stable while Qt Location
might change. Still, this should be pretty safe to use and will
probably be declared stable soon.
- qt3d: The original module has not been developed for two years. A
complete rewrite has been in development during that time. Qt 3D 2.0
will be available as a preview with Qt 5.5.
- qtsystems: Semi-active development. Qt 5.4 absorbed
 QStorageInfo to
be official part of qtbase, but it is a bit different and oddly does
not have QML support at this point. We include the SystemInfo module
on the phone images, but currently not the Publish Subscribe or
Service Framework modules from the same source.
- qtpim: Semi-active development, but can be considered supported
since our Renato is one of the upstream developers. Ubuntu uses the
Contacts/Organizer extensively in phone/scheduling apps.
- qtfeedback: Stable in the sense that there is no development
happening. It's also a very small module. If you are interested
 in the
module, consider taking an active role in the Qt Project where
contributions would surely be welcome.
   
-Timo
 
 




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Qt 5.4 QVariant change and module news

2015-02-20 Thread Timo Jyrinki
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Bogdan Cuza bogdan.c...@hotmail.com wrote:
 I have just received a vivid-proposed image and noticed that U1db no longer
 loads the defaults (which was probably a processed QVariantMap from JS). Did
 this change break it/could it break even more components?

Indeed this was a QVariant related problem and a fix is landing now.

There might be some other similar bugs lurking still, even though no
actual problems related to it have been spotted. I'll adjust the
landing test plan to include more non-required rebuilds in addition to
current 26 Qt private headers using packages. This would also have
been caught if eg u1db-qt was using autopkgtests to run its unit
tests. I think there were about 20 autopkgtest suites successfully run
against the new Qt at the time of landing. Increasing the amount of
autopkgtests would be useful, but so is catching these problems even
earlier, which is why the non-required rebuilds would help.

-Timo

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Qt 5.4 QVariant change and module news

2015-02-20 Thread Sergio Schvezov

On viernes 20 de febrero de 2015 07h'45:50 ART, Timo Jyrinki wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Bogdan Cuza 
bogdan.c...@hotmail.com wrote:
I have just received a vivid-proposed image and noticed that 
U1db no longer
loads the defaults (which was probably a processed QVariantMap 
from JS). Did

this change break it/could it break even more components?


Indeed this was a QVariant related problem and a fix is landing now.

There might be some other similar bugs lurking still, even though no
actual problems related to it have been spotted. I'll adjust the
landing test plan to include more non-required rebuilds in addition to
current 26 Qt private headers using packages. This would also have
been caught if eg u1db-qt was using autopkgtests to run its unit
tests. I think there were about 20 autopkgtest suites successfully run
against the new Qt at the time of landing. Increasing the amount of
autopkgtests would be useful, but so is catching these problems even
earlier, which is why the non-required rebuilds would help.


Telegram uses u1db; and on devel-proposed, reopening the app after first 
account creation is completely busted. I'm not sure it's related, but worth 
a look for your test plan.


That said, Telegram shouldn't require a rebuild, it just needs to work on 
rtm and vivid (according to the framework), as long as only ud1b needs 
rebuilding it should be fine.


--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


request for some pizzas

2015-02-20 Thread Jonathan Riddell
I'd like to claim €66 from the ubuntu community fund for some pizzas.
This will be used at the Plasma sprint here in Barcelona to continue
to work effectively late into the night with them as needed for
Kubuntu 15.04.

I've been told I need to request these ahead of time now.  This makes
it far more burdensome and less useful.  I don't know where to send
requests for this so I'm using this catch all list.

Requests to this fund are processed by Canonical's community team who
explicity have chosen not to be involved in parts of the ubuntu
community that canonical doesn't take part in, I think this should be
moved to the community council or just to the teams directly.

Jonathan

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: Help with debdiff generation of soundconverter package

2015-02-20 Thread Michele Giacomoli
Thank you Javier, still more professional than my tries :-)
I will check the meaning of your commands since I'd like to learn something
more about this, and try to redo your steps.
I'll also try your debdiff

Also thank you Robert for your suggestions, I'll check your steps too

2015-02-20 10:38 GMT+01:00 Javier Lopez chilic...@ubuntu.com:

 Hi Michele,

 Even when I'm not an Ubuntu developer just a enthusiastic user, I gave
 it a shot and created a basic debdiff, it may be used as base to
 create a formal one. This is how I did it:

 $ sudo apt-get install ubuntu-dev-tools git quilt fakeroot debhelper
 $ git clone https://github.com/kassoulet/soundconverter/
 $ cd soundconverter  git checkout origin/2.0
 $ #it seems like the patches you're interested are the last 3 commits
 $ git format-patch HEAD~3
 $ cd ../  mkdir ubuntu
 $ cd ubuntu  pull-lp-source soundconverter trusty
 $ cd soundconverter-2.0.4  dch -i #document the changes and replace
 raring with trusty
 $ mkdir debian/patches
 $ quilt import
 ../../soundconverter/0001-Missing-plugins-handling-ignore-video-codecs.patch
 $ quilt import
 ../../soundconverter/0002-Apply-patch-from-Michael.-Empty-task-queue-when-abor.patch
 $ quilt import
 ../../soundconverter/0003-Apply-patch-from-Michael-fixing-TypeError-when-calli.patch
 $ debuild -S -us -uc
 $ cd ..  debdiff *dsc  soundconverter.debdiff

 I didn't compile the result neither tested the result, (I ran this on
 a remote machine without X).  You could compile the result by running:
 $ debuild -us -uc #withouth the -S parameter

 I consulted the following sites to get the details (terrible memory):


 http://raphaelhertzog.com/2011/07/04/how-to-prepare-patches-for-debian-packages/
 http://makandracards.com/makandra/2521-git-how-to-create-and-apply-patches

 On 19/02/15 at 11:46pm, Michele Giacomoli wrote:
  Hi developers,
 
  The package soundconverter (2.0.4-0ubuntu1) in trusty repo has some bugs,
  so the developer created a branch (
  https://github.com/kassoulet/soundconverter/tree/2.0) with some highly
  recommended fixes for this version.
 
   I filled an SRU request for this (
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/soundconverter/+bug/1423709).
 I
  managed to build from source and everything seems to work fine, but I
 would
  need to attach a debdiff to the request, and I feel insecure with
 packaging
  stuff.
 
  So I ask you for help, if someone could try to build and generate a
  debdiff, or explain me the procedure to solve this problem, or who can
 ask
  for this.
 
  Thank you very much

  --
  ubuntu-devel mailing list
  ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
  Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: request for some pizzas

2015-02-20 Thread David Planella
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Jonathan Riddell j...@jriddell.org wrote:

 I'd like to claim €66 from the ubuntu community fund for some pizzas.
 This will be used at the Plasma sprint here in Barcelona to continue
 to work effectively late into the night with them as needed for
 Kubuntu 15.04.

 I've been told I need to request these ahead of time now.  This makes
 it far more burdensome and less useful.  I don't know where to send
 requests for this so I'm using this catch all list.


Hi Jonathan,

I'm a bit puzzled by this e-mail: you know very well where to request funds
for community events, as you've filed several such requests using this form
[1] over the last few months. In fact IIRC all of them have been approved
and reported [2] as any other approved requests.



 Requests to this fund are processed by Canonical's community team who
 explicity have chosen not to be involved in parts of the ubuntu
 community that canonical doesn't take part in,


We review these requests every week in the community team weekly call. They
often take longer than a week to process due to administrative overhead and
back and forth communication with requesters. Coincidentally, we just
discussed recommending requests to be filed a month in advance of the
actual event to set the expectations, especially after the fact that the
number of requests has steeply been increasing over the last couple of
months.

On the last request you filed, which was also approved, you were simply
asked not to file requests retroactively (that is, to send them in advance
rather than after the fact) and to provide detailed receipts, both of which
I think are sensible requirements.


 I think this should be
 moved to the community council or just to the teams directly.


I think it's fair to involve the CC and have a discussion if you really
think your requests haven't been handled fairly or if you believe there is
any flaw in the process. Either that, reaching to anyone in the community
team or sending an e-mail to the community team mailing list [3] would
probably be the best way forward. Everyone involved are easily reachable
and always open for discussion.

Cheers,
David.

[1] http://community.ubuntu.com/help-information/funding/
[2]
http://fridge.ubuntu.com/?s=Community+Donations+Reportsearchsubmit=Search
[3] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-community-team



 --
 ubuntu-devel mailing list
 ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: libgit2

2015-02-20 Thread Jonathan Riddell

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:14:02PM +0100, Harald Sitter wrote:
 On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Jackson Doak nosk...@ubuntu.com wrote:
  Just looking through upstream logs, this should be as simple as uploading
  libgit2-glib 0.22.0 and gitg 3.15.1
 
 unfortunately there's symbol retractions without soname change :(
 
 http://paste.ubuntu.com/10271618/

I'd say that makes it the responsibility of whatever team cares about
libgit2-glib and gitg to sort.  I'm happy to remove from the archive
if that means we can get the newer version of libgit in.

Jonathan

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: Updating SSSD for Vivid

2015-02-20 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
On 20 February 2015 at 22:02, Robie Basak robie.ba...@ubuntu.com wrote:
 On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:53:34PM -0200, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
  Any chances to see the latest SSSD (1.12.4) version for Vivid?

 Feature freeze was yesterday, so sorry, it's too late for an update in
 the schedule now. It'll need to wait for Vivid+1. Unless someone wants
 to drive analysing the changes and justifying and obtaining an exception
 from the release team if required?

 Robie

Oh! Too bad...

I'm building a few file servers with Samba4 but (also as AD DC), I am
moving from Winbind to SSSD, and from what I'm seeing, SSSD 1.12 is
the best choice for this scenario that I'm using (for file servers
without winbind).

I'll upgrade and maintain the new SSSD packages directly on my PPA instead.

Thank you!
Thiago

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: libgit2

2015-02-20 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Hi,

On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 12:00:17 +, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
 I'd say that makes it the responsibility of whatever team cares about
 libgit2-glib and gitg to sort.  I'm happy to remove from the archive
 if that means we can get the newer version of libgit in.

As far as I can see, both packages in question are coming unchanged from
Debian. Have you tried contacting the respective maintainers in Debian?

--
Dmitry Shachnev

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


[ubuntu-studio-devel] LiveFS ubuntustudio/vivid/i386 failed to build on 20150220

2015-02-20 Thread CD Image
: deferring update (trigger activated)
Setting up perl (5.20.1-5) ...
Setting up libdpkg-perl (1.17.23ubuntu1) ...
Setting up dpkg-dev (1.17.23ubuntu1) ...
Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.19-15ubuntu1) ...
Processing triggers for initramfs-tools (0.103ubuntu12) ...
Processing triggers for ca-certificates (20141019) ...
Updating certificates in /etc/ssl/certs... 10 added, 5 removed; done.
Running hooks in /etc/ca-certificates/update.ddone.
RUN: /usr/share/launchpad-buildd/slavebin/buildlivefs ['buildlivefs', 
'--build-id', 'LIVEFSBUILD-20374', '--arch', 'i386', '--project', 
'ubuntustudio-dvd', '--series', 'vivid', '--datestamp', '20150220-181705']
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
Reading state information...
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:
  libgcrypt11 libisl10 libsystemd-journal0
Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them.
The following extra packages will be installed:
  apt-utils dctrl-tools debootstrap dh-python germinate iso-codes
  libapt-inst1.5 libexpat1 liblzo2-2 libmpdec2 libpopt0 libpython2.7-minimal
  libpython3-stdlib libpython3.4-minimal libpython3.4-stdlib live-build
  lsb-release mime-support python

[ubuntu-studio-devel] LiveFS ubuntustudio/vivid/amd64 failed to build on 20150220

2015-02-20 Thread CD Image
RUN: /usr/share/launchpad-buildd/slavebin/slave-prep ['slave-prep']
Forking launchpad-buildd slave process...
Kernel version: Linux lamiak 3.2.0-76-generic #111-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jan 13 
22:16:09 UTC 2015 x86_64
Buildd toolchain package versions: launchpad-buildd_126 python-lpbuildd_126 
bzr_2.5.1-0ubuntu2 dpkg-dev_1.16.1.2ubuntu7.5.
Syncing the system clock with the buildd NTP service...
20 Feb 18:17:31 ntpdate[5973]: adjust time server 10.211.37.1 offset -0.19 
sec
RUN: /usr/share/launchpad-buildd/slavebin/unpack-chroot ['unpack-chroot', 
'LIVEFSBUILD-20373', 
'/home/buildd/filecache-default/a665269cbd0fd566602516993cd02903b7df1cae']
Unpacking chroot for build LIVEFSBUILD-20373
RUN: /usr/share/launchpad-buildd/slavebin/mount-chroot ['mount-chroot', 
'LIVEFSBUILD-20373']
Mounting chroot for build LIVEFSBUILD-20373
RUN: /usr/share/launchpad-buildd/slavebin/override-sources-list 
['override-sources-list', 'LIVEFSBUILD-20373', 'deb 
http://ftpmaster.internal/ubuntu vivid main universe']
Overriding sources.list in build-LIVEFSBUILD-20373
RUN: /usr/share/launchpad-buildd/slavebin/update-debian-chroot 
['update-debian-chroot', 'LIVEFSBUILD-20373', 'amd64']
Updating debian chroot for build LIVEFSBUILD-20373
Ign http://ftpmaster.internal vivid InRelease
Get:1 http://ftpmaster.internal vivid Release.gpg [933 B]
Ign http://archive-team.internal vivid InRelease
Get:2 http://ftpmaster.internal vivid Release [215 kB]
Ign http://archive-team.internal vivid Release.gpg
Get:3 http://ftpmaster.internal vivid/main amd64 Packages [1357 kB]
Get:4 http://ftpmaster.internal vivid/universe amd64 Packages [6484 kB]
Get:5 http://archive-team.internal vivid Release [728 B]
Get:6 http://archive-team.internal vivid/main amd64 Packages
Ign http://archive-team.internal vivid/main Translation-en
Get:7 http://ftpmaster.internal vivid/main Translation-en [781 kB]
Get:8 http://ftpmaster.internal vivid/universe Translation-en [4459 kB]
Fetched 13.3 MB in 4s (2929 kB/s)
Reading package lists...
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
Reading state information...
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:
  libgcrypt11 libisl10 libsystemd-journal0
Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them.
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  gcc-5-base libisl13 libsystemd0
The following packages will be upgraded:
  apt apt-transport-https base-files base-passwd bash binutils bsdutils
  busybox-initramfs bzip2 ca-certificates coreutils cpio cpp cpp-4.9 debconf
  dpkg dpkg-dev e2fslibs e2fsprogs fakeroot findutils g++ g++-4.9 gcc gcc-4.9
  gcc-4.9-base gnupg gpgv grep gzip ifupdown init-system-helpers
  initramfs-tools initramfs-tools-bin initscripts libacl1 libapt-pkg4.12
  libasan1 libasn1-8-heimdal libatomic1 libblkid1 libbz2-1.0 libc-bin
  libc-dev-bin libc6 libc6-dev libcap2 libcgmanager0 libcilkrts5 libcloog-isl4
  libcomerr2 libcurl3-gnutls libdb5.3 libdbus-1-3 libdebconfclient0
  libdpkg-perl libdrm2 libfakeroot libffi6 libgcc-4.9-dev libgcc1 libgcrypt20
  libgdbm3 libgmp10 libgnutls-deb0-28 libgomp1 libgpg-error0 libgssapi-krb5-2
  libgssapi3-heimdal libhcrypto4-heimdal libheimbase1-heimdal
  libheimntlm0-heimdal libhogweed2 libhx509-5-heimdal libitm1 libjson-c2
  libjson0 libk5crypto3 libkrb5-26-heimdal libkrb5-3 libkrb5support0 liblsan0
  libmount1 libmpc3 libmpfr4 libnettle4 libnih-dbus1 libnih1 libp11-kit0
  libpam-modules libpam-modules-bin libpam-runtime libpam0g libpcre3
  libplymouth4 libprocps3 libquadmath0 libroken18-heimdal librtmp1 libsasl2-2
  libsasl2-modules-db libselinux1 libsemanage-common libsemanage1 libslang2
  libsmartcols1 libsqlite3-0 libss2 libssl1.0.0 libstdc++-4.9-dev libstdc++6
  libtasn1-6 libtsan0 libubsan0 libudev1 libusb-0.1-4 libuuid1
  libwind0-heimdal linux-libc-dev login make mount mountall multiarch-support
  openssl passwd patch perl perl-base perl-modules plymouth procps sysv-rc
  sysvinit-utils tzdata udev upstart upstart-bin util-linux zlib1g
140 upgraded, 3 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 72.3 MB of archives.
After this operation, 4139 kB of additional disk space will be used.
Get:1 http://ftpmaster.internal/ubuntu/ vivid/main base-files amd64 7.2ubuntu8 
[63.5 kB]
Get:2 http://ftpmaster.internal/ubuntu/ vivid/main bash amd64 4.3-11ubuntu2 
[581 kB]
Get:3 http://ftpmaster.internal/ubuntu/ vivid/main libsystemd0 amd64 
219-1ubuntu1 [75.8 kB]
Get:4 http://ftpmaster.internal/ubuntu/ vivid/main bsdutils amd64 
1:2.25.2-4ubuntu1 [45.1 kB]
Get:5 http://ftpmaster.internal/ubuntu/ vivid/main coreutils amd64 
8.23-3ubuntu1 [1137 kB]
Get:6 http://ftpmaster.internal/ubuntu/ vivid/main dpkg amd64 1.17.23ubuntu1 
[2156 kB]
Get:7 http://ftpmaster.internal/ubuntu/ vivid/main libcap2 amd64 1:2.24-6 [12.8 
kB]
Get:8 http://ftpmaster.internal/ubuntu/ vivid/main libc-bin amd64 
2.19-15ubuntu1 [1162 kB]
Get:9 http://ftpmaster.internal/ubuntu/ vivid/main libdbus-1-3 amd64 
1.8.12-1ubuntu1 [147 kB]
Get:10 http://ftpmaster.internal/ubuntu/ 

Re: Updating SSSD for Vivid

2015-02-20 Thread Robie Basak
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:53:34PM -0200, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
  Any chances to see the latest SSSD (1.12.4) version for Vivid?

Feature freeze was yesterday, so sorry, it's too late for an update in
the schedule now. It'll need to wait for Vivid+1. Unless someone wants
to drive analysing the changes and justifying and obtaining an exception
from the release team if required?

Robie


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Updating SSSD for Vivid

2015-02-20 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
Hey guys!

 Any chances to see the latest SSSD (1.12.4) version for Vivid?

Best,
Thiago

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss