Re: GIMP *final* release for Gutsy?

2007-11-08 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 16:48:55 -0700 Scott (angrykeyboarder) 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gutsy shipped with a *non-final* release of The GIMP (2.4 RC3, to be
specific).

In situations of this type (my) logic would dictate that Gutsy would be
updated (gutsy-updates?) with the Final version soon after it's release
(rather than leave users with an unfinished product in main).

As this has not been the case, I requested a sync from Debian Sid (sid
currently has GIMP 2.4.1).  My request was marked as a duplicate of the
following:

   https://bugs.launchpad.net/baltix/+source/gimp/+bug/157642.

The initial response to that bug was THank you for your bug report. I'm
marking this as triaged.

The bug was then quietly changed from Triaged to Wishlist(!).

In my worst case scenario GIMP 2.4.x would eventually land in Gutsy
backports.  In my best case scenario it would (more logically) land in
main and in the next week.

It seems this has become a back burner bug.

How might I get it back to the front burner and how might I get GIMP
2.4.x to land in a Gutsy updates or backports place within,  say the
next week?

Please note:

I'm not a developer.
I'm not package maintainer.
I'm just an ordinary user.

As a rule, developers aren't terribly impressed by version numbers.  What 
problem are you 
having that you think this would fix and that is severe enough to warrant a 
stable release 
update?

Scott K

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Easier and more reliable ISO downloads, with error correction

2007-11-08 Thread Scott (angrykeyboarder)
John Richard Moser spake thusly on 218814416 ::

 OK, I had issues with bittorrent recently.  Changing my tune.
 

Whew! For a moment there you had me thinking you believe BitTorrent was
the greatest thing since sliced bread...
-- 
Scott
http://angrykeyboarder.com
I've never used an OS I didn't (dis)like.
©2007 angrykeyboarder™  Elmer Fudd. All Wites Wesewved


-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


GIMP *final* release for Gutsy?

2007-11-08 Thread Scott (angrykeyboarder)
Gutsy shipped with a *non-final* release of The GIMP (2.4 RC3, to be
specific).

In situations of this type (my) logic would dictate that Gutsy would be
updated (gutsy-updates?) with the Final version soon after it's release
(rather than leave users with an unfinished product in main).

As this has not been the case, I requested a sync from Debian Sid (sid
currently has GIMP 2.4.1).  My request was marked as a duplicate of the
following:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/baltix/+source/gimp/+bug/157642.

The initial response to that bug was THank you for your bug report. I'm
marking this as triaged.

The bug was then quietly changed from Triaged to Wishlist(!).

In my worst case scenario GIMP 2.4.x would eventually land in Gutsy
backports.  In my best case scenario it would (more logically) land in
main and in the next week.

It seems this has become a back burner bug.

How might I get it back to the front burner and how might I get GIMP
2.4.x to land in a Gutsy updates or backports place within,  say the
next week?

Please note:

I'm not a developer.
I'm not package maintainer.
I'm just an ordinary user.

Thank you.

-- 
Scott
http://angrykeyboarder.com
I've never used an OS I didn't (dis)like.
©2007 angrykeyboarder™  Elmer Fudd. All Wites Wesewved


-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Easier and more reliable ISO downloads, with error correction

2007-11-08 Thread Jan Claeys
Op dinsdag 06-11-2007 om 22:38 uur [tijdzone +], schreef Caroline
Ford:
 They don't tell you they block it until you have it installed. 

Which means they broke the contract, and you don't have to stay with
them for a year...


-- 
Jan Claeys


-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: A Wine-like compatibility layer to run Mac OS X programs on Linux?

2007-11-08 Thread Emmet Hikory
On 11/9/07, Greg K Nicholson wrote:
 Is a compatibility layer (like Wine) to run Mac OS X programs on Linux
 feasible? Does one already exist?

If you have a powerpc machine, the MacOnLinux (1) virtual layer
may be useful for many applications (although using alternate virtual
machines may be as convenient).  If you have an x86 machine, there are
a number of virtual machines that can be used for Intel OS X (with
appropriate modifications) and the Basilisk II m68k emulator (2) does
a reasonable job for older applications (through OS 8.1 or so).

Separately, for some applications, the GNU OpenStep (3)
implementation may provide source-level compatibility for some
applications (some of the Cocoa API is included).  I do not know of a
current effort providing binary compatibility for applications that
might be source compatible with GNUstep, although one is conceivable,
assuming appropriate wrappers / implementations for various assumed
system services (source for some of which are available from Darwin
(4)).

 Anyhow, it'd be cool if we could say all OS X programs will Just Work™
 on Ubuntu, too.

I'd suggest that the project of implementing a full compatibility
layer likely consists of many separate components, some ported from
Darwin, some as new components, and some implemented with GNUstep.
Given the scope, such an effort to provide a compatibility layer for
Linux is probably best done as a separate upstream project, outside
Ubuntu, with integration deferred until the system is somewhat stable,
and demonstrably suitable for at least a limited set of test
applications.  To promote testing with Ubuntu, such a project might
provide candidate Ubuntu packages in a separate repository, as a
technology demonstration and basis for ongoing efforts.

1: http://mac-on-linux.sourceforge.net/
2: http://basilisk.cebix.net/
3: http://www.gnustep.org/
4: http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/

-- 
Emmet HIKORY
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Windows Program Support

2007-11-08 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thursday 08 November 2007 20:15, Evan wrote:
 While this is not yet a major issue since the majority of users still
 choose Ubuntu expressly over Windows or Mac (and realize what they're
 getting into), there are several problems inherent with Ubuntu's growing
 popularity. One of these is that less technical users may purchase
 off-the-shelf software written for Win/Mac and expect it to run. While this
 is essentially their fault for not researching the system requirements of
 the software, Ubuntu could handle it far better than it currently does. At
 the moment it essentially ignores all Win/Mac binaries with an error that
 it could not open the file. This email is mainly to open up this topic for
 discussion, but the following is what I personally would like to see
 implemented for 8.10 (most of these changes are too large for LTS).

 When a binary is run, instead of giving the current error, provide a
 dialogue that notifies the user of the fact that it is a Windows program
 that cannot be run normally under Ubuntu. Then give the user two options:

- list / install equivalent software for linux, the recommended option
(via partnership with an organization like www.linuxalt.com or
similar)
- attempt to run it under wine (with caveat that it may not work)

Once this works, from a security perspective you have to assume that the user 
will click yes when a random please install me pop-up appears.  So once this 
works, Ubuntu will be vulnerable to many of the same security threats that 
Windows is (not that the machine can be fundamentally compromised, but that 
it can be turned into a useful bot).

 While I realize that wine is still highly unstable and incomplete, it is
 making progress, and it will now run the majority of programs which support
 win2k and earlier. Theoretically it should be starting to get better
 support for XP (which most new programs still support) by the 8.10 release,
 which will make it moderately useful. It won't run everything, but it will
 be considerably more useful than it has been in the past (largely in thanks
 to the slow Windows release cycle).

 In addition, Ubuntu should also add support for CD/DVD autorun. The
 majority of non-techy users will pop a CD in the drive and expect the
 installer to come up automatically. While most of them will be
 knowledgeable enough to browse the disk and find 'installer.exe' or
 'setup.exe', this would be a nice feature to make Ubuntu even more
 user-friendly.

 Ideally, Ubuntu would be able to identify the program (using a file hash?
 out of my depth here), and automatically list equivilant programs, as well
 as that program's rating in the Wine AppDB, directly inside the dialogue. I
 imagine that this would be difficult, but I'm not sure, and it would be
 really great if possible.

 Again, this is mainly to open the subject up for discussion, so discuss
 away!

My initial thought to the is please, please, no don't do this.  I waited a 
couple of hours to reply and I haven't reconsidered.

Once you make desirable Windows software easy to install, you've made all 
Windows software easy to install.  It seems the most common goal in 
compromising machines these days is to use them as bots.  Compromising a WINE 
install is sufficient for that.  Running A/V is not a solution on Linux any 
more than it's consistently effective on Windows (every Windows box I've ever 
been asked to remove a virus from had a virus scanner installed).

Windows software NOT working without actually being carefully installed is a 
feature and not a bug IMO.

Scott K

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: GIMP *final* release for Gutsy?

2007-11-08 Thread Scott (angrykeyboarder)
Scott Kitterman spake thusly :
 On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 16:48:55 -0700 Scott (angrykeyboarder) 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Gutsy shipped with a *non-final* release of The GIMP (2.4 RC3, to be
 specific).

 In situations of this type (my) logic would dictate that Gutsy would be
 updated (gutsy-updates?) with the Final version soon after it's release
 (rather than leave users with an unfinished product in main).


 As a rule, developers aren't terribly impressed by version numbers. 
 What problem are you  having that you think this would fix and that is severe 
 enough to warrant a stable release 
 update?

None that would interest [some Ubuntu] developers, I suppose

OK...

Off to plan B.

getdeb.net

Oh wait, Ubuntu developers get upset when users go elsewhere for updated
versions of software...

OK..

Off to plan C.

?




-- 
Scott
http://angrykeyboarder.com
I've never used an OS I didn't (dis)like.
©2007 angrykeyboarder™  Elmer Fudd. All Wites Wesewved


-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: GIMP *final* release for Gutsy?

2007-11-08 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thursday 08 November 2007 22:58, Scott (angrykeyboarder) wrote:
 Scott Kitterman spake thusly :
  On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 16:48:55 -0700 Scott (angrykeyboarder)
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Gutsy shipped with a *non-final* release of The GIMP (2.4 RC3, to be
  specific).
 
  In situations of this type (my) logic would dictate that Gutsy would be
  updated (gutsy-updates?) with the Final version soon after it's release
  (rather than leave users with an unfinished product in main).
 
  As a rule, developers aren't terribly impressed by version numbers.
  What problem are you  having that you think this would fix and that is
  severe enough to warrant a stable release update?

 None that would interest [some Ubuntu] developers, I suppose

 OK...

 Off to plan B.

 getdeb.net

 Oh wait, Ubuntu developers get upset when users go elsewhere for updated
 versions of software...

 OK..

 Off to plan C.

If you want to install software simply because it has a different version 
number, you are clearly interested in different thngs than I am.  You are 
quite welcome to risk breaking your system however you want.

If it's been uploaded to Hardy (I haven't looked) it should be possible to 
backport it to gutsy-backports.

My main concern is that if there are serious problems that are fixed in the 
later releases, we should fix them in gutsy-updates.

Scott K

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: GIMP *final* release for Gutsy?

2007-11-08 Thread Sebastian Heinlein
Am Donnerstag, den 08.11.2007, 20:58 -0700 schrieb Scott
(angrykeyboarder):
 
 None that would interest [some Ubuntu] developers, I suppose

You should get used to talk about facts. To support your request you
could for example write to the GIMP authors or contact them on IRC and
ask if they would recommend an update. This would only cost a minute.

Cheers,

Sebastian


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Windows Program Support

2007-11-08 Thread Sebastian Heinlein
Am Freitag, den 09.11.2007, 02:24 +0100 schrieb Sebastian Heinlein:
 Lots of your ideas have been discussed at the UDS last week. Furthermore
 you should consider that running Windows apps also opens the door to
 viruses and worms.
 
 Perhaps we could perform a ClamAV scan before running a Windows
 application?

I created a prototype:

http://www.glatzor.de/blog/blog-details/article/making-windows-applications-more-secure/

Furthermore the scan seems to be quite fast and not disrupting.


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: A Wine-like compatibility layer to run Mac OS X programs on Linux?

2007-11-08 Thread Sebastian Heinlein
Am Freitag, den 09.11.2007, 11:12 +0900 schrieb Emmet Hikory:
 If you have a powerpc machine, the MacOnLinux (1) virtual layer
 may be useful for many applications (although using alternate virtual
 machines may be as convenient).  If you have an x86 machine, there are
 a number of virtual machines that can be used for Intel OS X (with
 appropriate modifications) and the Basilisk II m68k emulator (2) does
 a reasonable job for older applications (through OS 8.1 or so).

AFAIK you are not allowed to virtualize MacOS.


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: GIMP *final* release for Gutsy?

2007-11-08 Thread Emmet Hikory
On 11/9/07, Scott (angrykeyboarder) wrote:
 Scott Kitterman spake thusly :
  On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 16:48:55 -0700 Scott (angrykeyboarder)  wrote:
  Gutsy shipped with a *non-final* release of The GIMP (2.4 RC3, to be
  specific).
 
  In situations of this type (my) logic would dictate that Gutsy would be
  updated (gutsy-updates?) with the Final version soon after it's release
  (rather than leave users with an unfinished product in main).
 

  As a rule, developers aren't terribly impressed by version numbers.
  What problem are you  having that you think this would fix and that is 
  severe enough to warrant a stable release
  update?

 None that would interest [some Ubuntu] developers, I suppose

 OK...

It is important to understand the nature of the issue.  Many of
the bugfixes that are applied in upstream GIMP 2.4 final are also
included in the current Ubuntu package (although the version number is
different).  If there is a specific bug that needs to be addressed, or
a specific patch that should be applied, emphasis on this issue would
spur resolution.

If the only issue is the text of the version string, without
behavioural impact, the developer time may be more beneficially
applied to resolution of more significant bugs, or preparation of the
next release.

 Off to plan B.

 getdeb.net

 Oh wait, Ubuntu developers get upset when users go elsewhere for updated
 versions of software...

No so much upset, but that packages from external repositories
cannot be supported (as the specifics of the packaging are not
controlled by Ubuntu).  It may be that the getdeb.net package is
perfect, but it may also be that it is not.

 Off to plan C.

 ?

https://launchpad.net/gutsy-backports/+filebug will be the solution,
once available packaging for gimp 2.4.1 is adjusted to include
existing Ubuntu changes.  This effort is currently in queue for
available developer time.  This effort may be accelerated by
investigation of the relevant Ubuntu variation, and the presentation
of a patch for review by developers (although it may be slowed by
interruption of the developers for repeated review of an incomplete
patch).

-- 
Emmet HIKORY

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: GIMP *final* release for Gutsy?

2007-11-08 Thread Scott (angrykeyboarder)
Emmet Hikory spake thusly:
 On 11/9/07, Scott (angrykeyboarder) wrote:
 Scott Kitterman spake thusly :
 On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 16:48:55 -0700 Scott (angrykeyboarder)  wrote:
 Gutsy shipped with a *non-final* release of The GIMP (2.4 RC3, to be
 specific).

 In situations of this type (my) logic would dictate that Gutsy would be
 updated (gutsy-updates?) with the Final version soon after it's release
 (rather than leave users with an unfinished product in main).

 As a rule, developers aren't terribly impressed by version numbers.
 What problem are you  having that you think this would fix and that is 
 severe enough to warrant a stable release
 update?
 None that would interest [some Ubuntu] developers, I suppose

 OK...
 
 It is important to understand the nature of the issue.  Many of
 the bugfixes that are applied in upstream GIMP 2.4 final are also
 included in the current Ubuntu package (although the version number is
 different).

This is to confuse us, correct? ;)

 If there is a specific bug that needs to be addressed, or
 a specific patch that should be applied, emphasis on this issue would
 spur resolution.

*Of course* there are (were) bugs. Upstream stable is now a .1 release.

https://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/lists/gimp-announce/2007-October/89.html


 
 If the only issue is the text of the version string, without
 behavioral impact, the developer time may be more beneficially
 applied to resolution of more significant bugs, or preparation of the
 next release.
 
 Off to plan B.

 getdeb.net

 Oh wait, Ubuntu developers get upset when users go elsewhere for updated
 versions of software...
 
 No so much upset, but that packages from external repositories
 cannot be supported (as the specifics of the packaging are not
 controlled by Ubuntu).  It may be that the getdeb.net package is
 perfect, but it may also be that it is not.


And my whole point is that if developers would start thinking more like
users (especially the users the SABDFL strives to attract) getdeb.net
wouldn't exist.

For the record, I'm no fan of getdeb.net.  In general, If Ubuntu isn't
interested in providing me with the software I want or need, I go to
prefer third party apt repositories. They tend to make for much
smoother installs (comments on the getdeb.net page for GIMP 2.4.1 are a
classic example of why).


 
 Off to plan C.

 ?
 
 https://launchpad.net/gutsy-backports/+filebug will be the solution,


 been there, done that.

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gimp/+bug/157642/comments/6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gimp/+bug/157642/comments/8

...
 once available packaging for gimp 2.4.1 is adjusted to include
 existing Ubuntu changes.  This effort is currently in queue for
 available developer time.  This effort may be accelerated by
 investigation of the relevant Ubuntu variation, and the presentation
 of a patch for review by developers (although it may be slowed by
 interruption of the developers for repeated review of an incomplete
 patch).

I see.


I guess I must get over beta/rc stigma..


For some strange reason I'd rather have a final release of a program
rather than a beta or a release candidate. I'm weird like that.

-- 
Scott
http://angrykeyboarder.com
I've never used an OS I didn't (dis)like.
©2007 angrykeyboarder™  Elmer Fudd. All Wites Wesewved


-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: GIMP *final* release for Gutsy?

2007-11-08 Thread Scott (angrykeyboarder)
Christopher Halse Rogers spake thusly:
 On 11/9/07, Scott (angrykeyboarder) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 ...

 For some strange reason I'd rather have a final release of a program
 rather than a beta or a release candidate. I'm weird like that.

 Release candidates (especially later ones) tend to be nearly identical
 to the actual release (unless you're MPlayer, apparently).  Often the
 release *is* the final release candidate, just with a version bump.

I'm aware of this. It's often (but not always) true.

 
 All of this means that, yes, we'd like to see the bugs that are fixed
 in the new release over RC3, so we can weigh up the risk of breaking
 stuff against the benefits of the bug fixes.  And the best way to
 notify the people who can do something about it is generally not on
 ubuntu-devel-discuss, but on launchpad in bug(s) against the gimp
 package.

See the message that started this thread for details.

-- 
Scott
http://angrykeyboarder.com
I've never used an OS I didn't (dis)like.
©2007 angrykeyboarder™  Elmer Fudd. All Wites Wesewved


-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Windows Program Support

2007-11-08 Thread Scott (angrykeyboarder)
Evan spake thusly:

less technical users may purchase
 off-the-shelf software written for Win/Mac and expect it to run [in Ubuntu].

Surely, you just...


-- 
Scott
http://angrykeyboarder.com
I've never used an OS I didn't (dis)like.
©2007 angrykeyboarder™  Elmer Fudd. All Wites Wesewved


-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss