Re: Moblin and Gnome
* Spencer, Bob | Lastly, perhaps we could agree on some standards for branching existing | projects. For example #ifdef tag, for code, Makefile.am, | configure.in, etc. Then we could easily go to a project and find | where/if someone else had added mobile-device-specific changes. | | tag = MID or UME or HILDON or MOBILE | (My vote is MID) In the style of autoconf, I suggest we use #ifdef USE_HILDON -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are -- Ubuntu-mobile mailing list Ubuntu-mobile@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mobile
Re: psb.ko module
* Ben Collins | I think the best way to overcome this is to have a set kernel | development schedule for the release, with relative dates bound by | milestones, freezes, and other dates on the main release schedule. I | think keeping the projects informed about what they can expect from the | kernel, and how they need to interact with the kernel team for their | schedules, would benefit all. Another option would be to have faster-moving targets such as the UME port build-depend on linux-source-2.6.22 and then we can do uploads at our own leisure. This requires a bit more manpower, but would make it harder for us to end up being blocked in the way we've been recently. -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are -- Ubuntu-mobile mailing list Ubuntu-mobile@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mobile
Weekly Status
Moblin Image Creator * Switched over to using LPIA when creating platforms and targets. * Some GUI improvements were made. Moblin.org: * Packages are now being built with LPIA architecture. -- Ubuntu-mobile mailing list Ubuntu-mobile@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mobile
Moblin Applets (moblin-utilities) Status Update
[General] * three remaining plugins expected before Oct 12: volume status bar, brightness status bar, and touchscreen calibration applets. The first two will be taken from gnome-applets with all the bonobo interface code stripped out, the last will come from gnome-control-center's mouse caplet combined with evtouch code. [Applet Updates] Network: * Network and Date/Time are now just links to the gnome-system-tools executables. - | Todd Brandt - Intel Oregon | |Linux for Mobile Internet Devices (MID)| | 2111 W NE 25th Ave| |Hillsboro, OR 97124 JF1-235| |---| | Of all the things I've lost, I miss | |my mind the most - Mark Twain | - -- Ubuntu-mobile mailing list Ubuntu-mobile@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mobile
USB Client Status: 10/4/2007
- Continued work on bug fixing and validation of both driver and utility software. - May be able to pull in schedule and make this available early. - Intel is working internally to determine new delivery date. Don Johnson Ultra-Mobility Group Intel Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Ubuntu-mobile mailing list Ubuntu-mobile@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mobile
Poulsbo Graphics: Graphics Driver status: 10/4/2007
- Development on track for possible schedule pull in. - Intel is working internally to determine new delivery date. Don Johnson Ultra-Mobility Group Intel Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Ubuntu-mobile mailing list Ubuntu-mobile@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mobile
RE: Moblin and Gnome
Tollef Fog Heen wrote: * Spencer, Bob Lastly, perhaps we could agree on some standards for branching existing projects. For example #ifdef tag, for code, Makefile.am, configure.in, etc. Then we could easily go to a project and find where/if someone else had added mobile-device-specific changes. tag = MID or UME or HILDON or MOBILE (My vote is MID) In the style of autoconf, I suggest we use #ifdef USE_HILDON -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are Sounds good to me. Bob -- Ubuntu-mobile mailing list Ubuntu-mobile@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mobile
FW: Midbrowser Status update (09/27/07 - 10/04/07)
From: Wong, Carl Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 8:30 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Midbrowser Status update (09/27/07 - 10/04/07) * Implemented UI changes to preference tabs. Jimmy is working on replacing the network proxy setting with gconf. * Investigated panning support for Midbrowser. Found out that someone has implemented panning support for Minimo, I Will see what it takes to incorporate that into Midbrowser. * Analyzed incoming bugs. Will be in bug fixing mode in the next couple of weeks. -Carl -- Ubuntu-mobile mailing list Ubuntu-mobile@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mobile
Status update for Thermal Extensions (Dabney)
- No change - Still on track for delivery around WW41/Week of Oct 8th Don Johnson Ultra-Mobility Group Intel Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Ubuntu-mobile mailing list Ubuntu-mobile@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mobile
Re: psb.ko module
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 08:31:38AM -0700, Tobin Davis wrote: Since there is a two week delay between pushing patches upstream into the ubuntu-kernel and them getting back into the daily builds, wouldn't it make sense to test these changes prior to pushing them? It seems to me that we spend a lot of time spinning our wheels hoping a push doesn't break, and then scrambling when it does. It would be much more efficient if we tested them before submitting. At least that's how we do it in alsa. We're going through some teething pains because in some respects we're still bootstrapping the base system. Moving to the lpia architecture was a massive change and some breakage was to be expected. That said, could do better here. Amit, do you have the necessary resources to test a kernel build from GIT all the way through to an installable image? -- - mdz -- Ubuntu-mobile mailing list Ubuntu-mobile@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mobile
Re: Moblin and Gnome
Ola In the style of autoconf, I suggest we use #ifdef USE_HILDON maemo uses #ifdef MAEMO_CHANGES maybe keeping compatible with this could be 'a good thing' []'s Ian -- http://ianlawrence.info -- Ubuntu-mobile mailing list Ubuntu-mobile@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mobile
Re: psb.ko module
On 10/4/07, Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 08:31:38AM -0700, Tobin Davis wrote: Since there is a two week delay between pushing patches upstream into the ubuntu-kernel and them getting back into the daily builds, wouldn't it make sense to test these changes prior to pushing them? It seems to me that we spend a lot of time spinning our wheels hoping a push doesn't break, and then scrambling when it does. It would be much more efficient if we tested them before submitting. At least that's how we do it in alsa. We're going through some teething pains because in some respects we're still bootstrapping the base system. Moving to the lpia architecture was a massive change and some breakage was to be expected. That said, could do better here. Amit, do you have the necessary resources to test a kernel build from GIT all the way through to an installable image? I think so, yes. I need to start figuring out how to use the machine farm to speed up compile and spare my poor laptop though. -- Ubuntu-mobile mailing list Ubuntu-mobile@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mobile
