Re: lsmod shows nothing
just checked and found that it is running on 8.10. does it matter? Alexander Kraev wrote: > It has been running since December 2008. > > brent timothy saner wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Alexander Kraev wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> No, it's a dedicated server. >>> >>> modprobe -ls shows: >>> >>> /lib/modules/2.6.27.9/kernel/drivers/scsi/scsi_wait_scan.ko >>> >>> Regards, >>> Sasha >>> >> >> stock kernel config? >> >> i have to admit, that's fairly unusual. how long has it been running >> 8.04? what's the total life of the server so far? >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- >> Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) >> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org >> >> iEYEARECAAYFAkqfjGEACgkQ8u2Zh4MtlQoIygCgqXlvz091GJIgpOoCI9RTKJ/a >> bXkAn16/WVmmhArixbAuJ+xNXDk7LbCT >> =tqKa >> -END PGP SIGNATURE- >> > -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: lsmod shows nothing
It has been running since December 2008. brent timothy saner wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Alexander Kraev wrote: >> Hi, >> >> No, it's a dedicated server. >> >> modprobe -ls shows: >> >> /lib/modules/2.6.27.9/kernel/drivers/scsi/scsi_wait_scan.ko >> >> Regards, >> Sasha >> > > stock kernel config? > > i have to admit, that's fairly unusual. how long has it been running > 8.04? what's the total life of the server so far? > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iEYEARECAAYFAkqfjGEACgkQ8u2Zh4MtlQoIygCgqXlvz091GJIgpOoCI9RTKJ/a > bXkAn16/WVmmhArixbAuJ+xNXDk7LbCT > =tqKa > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: Virtualization
hi On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Midnite Mac (.com) wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > My name is Michael and I have recently purchased a Dell PowerEdge > (T105 AMD series). At this time, I have installed WordPress onto it. > In addition, I have built my own personal foundation for my community > project; 'BurbankLUG' at burbanklug.org/blog With that said, I am now > looking towards setting up Virtualization... But now, after bringing > up Virtualization? What should I use? As I have been doing some > research... I am left with the following question? Which should I > use..? > > KVM or VMware? And why? > there are lot of choice based on what you want to achieve. I personally use OpenVZ (this is very simillar to chroot, but with better security) and it work great. Other tools that i use is VirtualBox and Xen. If you are looking at running few guest operating system and its hydrid (linux and windows), Xen is first preference for me. On the other hand if you just want to test few guest, easy start would be VirtualBox. I suggest you read more about Virtualizationhere http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtualization detailed list of linux Virtualization technologies is here http://virt.kernelnewbies.org/ - sree -- http://picasaweb.google.com/gnuyoga संगच्छध्वं - Let's move together M: +91 90 37 92 83 87 @: sree [at] openbravo [dot] com IRC channel #openbravo at irc.freenode.net Skype: gnuyoga -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: lsmod shows nothing
Hi, No, it's a dedicated server. modprobe -ls shows: /lib/modules/2.6.27.9/kernel/drivers/scsi/scsi_wait_scan.ko Regards, Sasha brent timothy saner wrote: > Alexander Kraev wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have a server running on Ubuntu 8.04. I just got an access, so I >> started to check how the system works and I was confused by the fact >> that 'lsmod' command shows nothing, '/proc/modules' is also empty. Is it ok? >> >> Regards, >> Sasha >> > > might be a VPS which uses a shared-kernel system. > > i'm guesing modprobe -ls also returns nothing? > > do lease it from a company or is it a physical box you have? -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
lsmod shows nothing
Hi, I have a server running on Ubuntu 8.04. I just got an access, so I started to check how the system works and I was confused by the fact that 'lsmod' command shows nothing, '/proc/modules' is also empty. Is it ok? Regards, Sasha -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: Virtualization
There are several variables in this but here goes: KVM is a great community option which is widely supported and I would say is your best option if you plan on Ubuntu being the host operating system. Now that said VMware has several options, and is a very mature virtualization technology. Wiht VMware server (The Free version you install onto another operating system) has a few improvements of system resource handling over KVM but it mostly shows through when running VM optimized kernels and Windows Guests. However if you are talking about using ESXi (another Free version from VMWare, but its own O/S) then My opinion is that nothing out performs it in the VM World at this point. If you want the free support and help of the Ubuntu community, (Which I highly suggest), you should go with KVM on Ubuntu Server. -Nick On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Midnite Mac (.com) wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > My name is Michael and I have recently purchased a Dell PowerEdge > (T105 AMD series). At this time, I have installed WordPress onto it. > In addition, I have built my own personal foundation for my community > project; 'BurbankLUG' at burbanklug.org/blog With that said, I am now > looking towards setting up Virtualization... But now, after bringing > up Virtualization? What should I use? As I have been doing some > research... I am left with the following question? Which should I > use..? > > KVM or VMware? And why? > > Thank you, All! > > Michael S. Mason > BurbankLUG.org/blog > > > > -- > ubuntu-server mailing list > ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server > More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam > -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: Virtualization
> Hello Everyone, > > > KVM or VMware? And why? > it depends on what you want to achieve. For VMWare there are several products available and you have to say what product you want to compare it to KVM. If you want to use a freely available Open Source virtualisation you should choose KVM. If you have more technical concerns you should know what you want to achieve. For just virtualizing some servers you can achieve this with most of the common virtualization software. For myself I administer some VMWare Server servers, some Xen servers and one KVM server. They all work great in their use cases and you can run various guest OSs on them. But all three have advantages or disadvantages. For myself I prefer Xen, because I have much more knowledge about it than VMWare or KVM. But it is really nasty to get the Xen code in the Linux kernel... I think that's why Ubuntu dropped support for it and I use Debian Lenny as the virt host installation... With KVM I had once problems installing a Windows Vista OS. It was awfully slow and I never understood why. Sadly I had not the time to figure out why and I had to use Xen... The best way to know what virtualization you prefer is by trying out :-). Hope this helps in some way, Michael -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
