[Bug 222804] Re: [SRU] fail2ban fails to start after reboot
On Ubuntu 8.04.1 I downloaded and installed the package for Intrepid Ibex and now it works. http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/f/fail2ban/fail2ban_0.8.3-2_all.deb -- [SRU] fail2ban fails to start after reboot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222804 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 197476] Re: akonadi does not work with the apparmor rules introduced for /usr/sbin/mysqld on hardy.
Should be working since 0.82.0-0ubuntu2 ** Changed in: akonadi (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- akonadi does not work with the apparmor rules introduced for /usr/sbin/mysqld on hardy. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197476 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.0 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 218734] Re: (ITS#5527) slapd segfaults when using dynlist
Anderson, I tested the 2.4.9-0ubuntu0.8.04 and the bug is gone. -- (ITS#5527) slapd segfaults when using dynlist https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218734 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap2.3 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 249824] Re: [intrepid] IPv6 unusable
This bug is still there with 1:9.5.0.dfsg.P2-1ubuntu1. Rebuilding the source package on an IPv6 enabled box did not fix it. In the buildlog at http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17069359 /buildlog_ubuntu- intrepid-i386.bind9_1%3A9.5.0.dfsg.P2-1ubuntu1_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz you can see checking for sin6_scope_id in struct sockaddr_in6... yes checking for in6_pktinfo... no -- disabling runtime ipv6 support According to a bug filed with Gentoo this is a problem with glibc 2.8 (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=227333). There is a patch to configure.in filed with this bug that fixes the problem (http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=157025). Unfortunately it requires rerunning autotools (debian/rules autofiles), which I did not get to work. I probably don't have all the necessary tools installed. Bug #257909 and #259740 are most likely duplicates of this. -- [intrepid] IPv6 unusable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249824 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 259740] Re: DNS: not able to use IPv6 Resolvers
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 249824 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249824 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 249824 [intrepid] IPv6 unusable -- DNS: not able to use IPv6 Resolvers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259740 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 257909] Re: bind9 doesn't bind to IPv6 interfaces
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 249824 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249824 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 249824 [intrepid] IPv6 unusable -- bind9 doesn't bind to IPv6 interfaces https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257909 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 242309] Re: expire-log-days typo error
** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Didier Roche (didrocks) Status: New = Confirmed -- expire-log-days typo error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242309 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.0 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 238872] Re: HEREDOC fails when terminating string matches tail of HEREDOC string
hello Chuck, I tested your php5, and it seems to have made the problem worse. Now, instead of just getting rid of the matching tail, it also takes another character with it. Sorry! -- HEREDOC fails when terminating string matches tail of HEREDOC string https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238872 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 261198] Re: Add UFW profile integration with apache2
Comment from mathiaz: [18:39] mathiaz nxvl: as of intrepid, apache2 comes with ssl ootb [18:40] mathiaz nxvl: apache2 depends on ssl-cert and uses the snake-oil-cert IIRC So, make Apache Full profile as default. * add ufw integration (see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuFirewall#Integrating%20UFW%20with%20Packages) (LP: #261198) - debian/control: suggest ufw for apache2.2-common - add apache2.2-common.ufw.profile with 3 profiles and install it to /etc/ufw/applications.d/apache2.2-common - apache2.2-common.postinst: add Apache Full rules as default as apache2 now depends on ssl-cert and uses the snake-oil-cert - apache2.2-common.postrm: remove the profile on --purge ** Attachment removed: apache2_2.2.9-3ubuntu2.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17069237/apache2_2.2.9-3ubuntu2.debdiff ** Attachment added: apache2_2.2.9-3ubuntu2.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17094068/apache2_2.2.9-3ubuntu2.debdiff -- Add UFW profile integration with apache2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261198 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 261544] [NEW] Please add UFW profile integration with Samba
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba Ubuntu FireWall have now some features to integrate profiles from different application. Instead of knowing the ports on which xxx service is running, the administrator have different profiles and can create some rules on the profile instead of updating the targeted port. For that, we need to add some files to /etc/ufw/applications.d/ and add automatically a rule to this profile regarding the ufw current policy. ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Please add UFW profile integration with Samba https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261544 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 261544] Re: Please add UFW profile integration with Samba
** Attachment added: samba_3.2.1-1ubuntu5.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17094684/samba_3.2.1-1ubuntu5.debdiff -- Please add UFW profile integration with Samba https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261544 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 260687] Re: pam_smbpass.so segfaults
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None = samba -- pam_smbpass.so segfaults https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260687 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 253268] Re: php5-cgi not working with suphp in Hardy
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #477646 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=477646 ** Also affects: suphp (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=477646 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- php5-cgi not working with suphp in Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253268 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 253268] Re: php5-cgi not working with suphp in Hardy
** Changed in: suphp (Debian) Status: Unknown = New -- php5-cgi not working with suphp in Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253268 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 205608] Re: libapache2-mod-php5 can't be configured
This was the fix for my problem, why this happened I have no idea. It took quite a bit of searching to locate this... Run /usr/share/debconf/fix_db.pl as root user I hope this will help someone else! Steve -- libapache2-mod-php5 can't be configured https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205608 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 261544] Re: Please add UFW profile integration with Samba
Updating debdiff, i forgot to add a line on changelog. ** Attachment added: samba_3.2.1-1ubuntu5.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17099535/samba_3.2.1-1ubuntu5.debdiff -- Please add UFW profile integration with Samba https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261544 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 253268] Re: php5-cgi not working with suphp in Hardy
I think this should work (however in my case, I compiled from source): Download '*0.6.2-1ubuntu1_i386.deb' files (as listed below in the deb -i) from launchpad (might need current version on the purge statements) % sudo apt-get purge libapache2-mod-suphp % sudo apt-get purge suphp-common % deb -i suphp-common_0.6.2-1ubuntu1_i386.deb % deb -i libapache2-mod-suphp_0.6.2-1ubuntu1_i386.deb (I added my files attached below in case the ones from launchpad don't work) ** Attachment added: (technically unchanged) .deb files with older code made on a Hardy machine http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17100893/suphp-common_0.6.2-1ubuntu1_i386.deb -- php5-cgi not working with suphp in Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253268 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 191251] Re: [needs-packaging] php5-embed
Ok, thank you for your answer i will test it at night. On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 3:27 AM, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Nicolas, There is a presentation here that explains it: www.cluesheet.com/lectures/phptek-embedding.pdf. There is a more detailed guide to programming with it here: http://phi.lv/?p=376 I guess to test it you would compile and link a program against it. Here is a sample program: http://code.google.com/p/phc/source/browse/trunk/misc/old/tryout.c Once the package is installed (in /usr/local), you should be able to compile it with: gcc -I/usr/local/include/php -I/usr/local/include/php/main -I/usr/local/include/php/TSRM -I/usr/local/include/php/Zend -L/usr/local/lib -Wl,-R/usr/local/lib -lphp5 tryout.c I've tested this on Hardy, and it compiles fine. You may need to use /usr/include instead of /usr/local/include. Thanks, Paul On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Nicolas Valcárcel (nxvl) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can you please give some documentation (a link to) about what is actually embed and/or some tests to check my package please ** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu) Assignee: Nicolas Valcárcel (nxvl) (nvalcarcel) = (unassigned) -- [needs-packaging] php5-embed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191251 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Paul Biggar [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [needs-packaging] php5-embed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191251 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs -- [needs-packaging] php5-embed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191251 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 242313] Re: TLS_CACERTDIR not supported in gnutls
I can confirm the cacertdir not implemented for gnutls warning message. The same setup that worked for me on Gutsy no longer works on Hardy. I had only added the following option to my /etc/ldap/ldap.conf file: TLS_CACERTDIR /usr/share/ca-certificates/mozilla However, while this ticket might be valid as far as support for TLS_CACERTDIR goes, it appears that the actual connection problems are a different problem (see bug #257153). There, the user is using the TLS_CACERT option, is not getting any gnutls warning, and is still getting the same connection error. ** Changed in: openldap2.3 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- TLS_CACERTDIR not supported in gnutls https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242313 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap2.3 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 257153] Re: TLS: peer cert untrusted or revoked (0x82) error in Hardy's version of ldap-utils
I am seeing this same issue. Let me know if there is any information I can provide that would be helpful, but my output is basically the same as what Karl has already posted. And for those interested, you can work around the issue with the following option in ldap.conf: TLS_REQCERT allow ...however, this is insecure as it ignores certificate verification errors and just continues with the connection anyway. ** Changed in: openldap2.3 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- TLS: peer cert untrusted or revoked (0x82) error in Hardy's version of ldap-utils https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257153 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap2.3 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 235653] Re: [SRU] ACL covering all IPv4 addresses is broken in 2.2.1
Hi Charles, Well, most sysadmins that I know, including the sysadmin that is me :), prefer security in depth and don't want an either-or choice between application-level and system-level ACLs. Note also that newer versions of NUT are dropping ACLs in favor of binding to interfaces (with a failsafe default of not binding to any interfaces automatically). I believe the rationale was that by binding to a specific interface, there is no chance for someone to exploit any potential holes in the NUT ACL code. That's not a meaningful solution for users who want to allow remote access from certain addresses and only have one interface. -- [SRU] ACL covering all IPv4 addresses is broken in 2.2.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235653 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 261689] [NEW] Please add UFW profile integration with dovecot
Public bug reported: Ubuntu FireWall have now some features to integrate profiles from different application. Instead of knowing the ports on which xxx service is running, the administrator have different profiles and can create some rules on the profile instead of updating the targeted port. For that, we need to add some files to /etc/ufw/applications.d/ and add automatically a rule to this profile regarding the ufw current policy. ** Affects: dovecot (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed -- Please add UFW profile integration with dovecot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261689 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 261689] Re: Please add UFW profile integration with dovecot
** Attachment added: dovecot_1.1.2-1ubuntu6.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17105349/dovecot_1.1.2-1ubuntu6.debdiff ** Changed in: dovecot (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Please add UFW profile integration with dovecot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261689 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 261544] Re: Please add UFW profile integration with Samba
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Please add UFW profile integration with Samba https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261544 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 235653] Re: [SRU] ACL covering all IPv4 addresses is broken in 2.2.1
On Aug 26, 2008, at 8:11 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: Hi Charles, Well, most sysadmins that I know, including the sysadmin that is me :), prefer security in depth and don't want an either-or choice between application-level and system-level ACLs. Understood, but at the very least, application-level ACLs are probably better handled by something like libwrap, with a common syntax, and a more thoroughly-inspected codebase. We don't want to lull users into thinking that the NUT ACLs are a complete replacement for firewall rules. Note also that newer versions of NUT are dropping ACLs in favor of binding to interfaces (with a failsafe default of not binding to any interfaces automatically). I believe the rationale was that by binding to a specific interface, there is no chance for someone to exploit any potential holes in the NUT ACL code. That's not a meaningful solution for users who want to allow remote access from certain addresses and only have one interface. This is starting to stray from the original issue in this bug regarding 2.2.1. I don't want to misrepresent the intentions of the rest of the NUT team - do you mind if I quote this message and some history on the NUT developer list, and CC you? -- [SRU] ACL covering all IPv4 addresses is broken in 2.2.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235653 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 261699] [NEW] Please add UFW profile integration with Bind9
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bind9 Ubuntu FireWall have now some features to integrate profiles from different application. Instead of knowing the ports on which xxx service is running, the administrator have different profiles and can create some rules on the profile instead of updating the targeted port. For that, we need to add some files to /etc/ufw/applications.d/ and add automatically a rule to this profile regarding the ufw current policy. ** Affects: bind9 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed -- Please add UFW profile integration with Bind9 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261699 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 261698] [NEW] Please add UFW profile integration with postfix
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: postfix Ubuntu FireWall have now some features to integrate profiles from different application. Instead of knowing the ports on which xxx service is running, the administrator have different profiles and can create some rules on the profile instead of updating the targeted port. For that, we need to add some files to /etc/ufw/applications.d/ and add automatically a rule to this profile regarding the ufw current policy. ** Affects: postfix (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed -- Please add UFW profile integration with postfix https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 261698] Re: Please add UFW profile integration with postfix
** Attachment added: postfix_2.5.4-1ubuntu2.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17105701/postfix_2.5.4-1ubuntu2.debdiff ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Please add UFW profile integration with postfix https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 247598] Re: dnsmasq might be vulnerable to recent DNS spoofing issue
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu Dapper) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu Feisty) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu Gutsy) Status: New = Confirmed -- dnsmasq might be vulnerable to recent DNS spoofing issue https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247598 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 261698] Re: Please add UFW profile integration with postfix
Port 587 is far more important than 465, but a bigger question is that port opening is really a function of Postfix config. If smtps is not configured, then there's no reason to open 465 (that's actually officially assigned to another protocol). ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete -- Please add UFW profile integration with postfix https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 222804] Re: [SRU] fail2ban fails to start after reboot
** Changed in: fail2ban (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- [SRU] fail2ban fails to start after reboot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222804 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 261698] Re: Please add UFW profile integration with postfix
That's why that profile is not loaded by default, just added for enabling it by hand when user want's to, the default profile is Postfix, which allows port 25, because that's the default opened port in an out-of-the-box instalation. Port number for TLS was taken from /usr/share/doc/postfix/TLS_README.gz i wasn't sure about what port number to use and that file told it was 465. Updating debdiff with 587 instead of 465. ** Attachment added: postfix_2.5.4-1ubuntu2.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17107963/postfix_2.5.4-1ubuntu2.debdiff -- Please add UFW profile integration with postfix https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
