[Bug 286828] [NEW] CIFS share broken after upgrade from 8.04 - 8.10
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: smbfs System info: smbfs: Installed: 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3 Candidate: 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3 Description:Ubuntu 8.10 Release:8.10 [0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -a Linux firefly 2.6.27-7-generic #1 SMP Fri Oct 17 22:24:30 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux Expected results: CIFS mounts keeps working after upgrade. Results: After upgrading from 8.04 to 8.10 (roughly one week ago, on the 23rd of Oct 08) using update-manager -d my CIFS mounts stopped working properly. I did not change any settings between them, and I have another machine on this network that is still running 8.04 and that doesn't have any problems. They mount fine, and I can, with some effort, copy and read files from it (though I have to do it manually, as many programs will whine). As an example (here /mnt/diverse is my cifs mountpoint, mounted from a MyBook network drive): [0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -l /mnt/diverse/test ls: cannot access /mnt/diverse/test: No such file or directory [2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ touch /mnt/diverse/test touch: setting times of `/mnt/diverse/test': Not a directory [1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -l /mnt/diverse/test -rwxr--r-- 1 zerodogg zerodogg 0 Oct 21 08:39 /mnt/diverse/test [0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -l /mnt/diverse/test2 ls: cannot access /mnt/diverse/test2: No such file or directory [2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ touch test2 [0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ mv test2 /mnt/diverse/ `test2' - `/mnt/diverse/test2' mv: preserving times for `/mnt/diverse/test2': Not a directory mv: setting permissions for `/mnt/diverse/test2': Not a directory removed `test2' [0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ chmod 644 /mnt/diverse/test2 chmod: changing permissions of `/mnt/diverse/test2': Not a directory [0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rsync -avzh --progress --partial test3 /mnt/diverse/ sending incremental file list test3 0 100%0.00kB/s0:00:00 (xfer#1, to-check=0/1) rsync: mkstemp /mnt/diverse/.test3.mllG7b failed: Not a directory (20) sent 87 bytes received 31 bytes 236.00 bytes/sec total size is 0 speedup is 0.00 rsync error: some files could not be transferred (code 23) at main.c(1058) [sender=3.0.3] The same commands, on the same mount on the 8.04 machine works perfectly fine. It also worked fine on this (8.10) machine before the upgrade. The relevant fstab entry (I have tried with and without dir_mode,file_mode,nounix): //zdmybook/DIVERSE /mnt/diverse cifs username=USERNAME,password=PASSWORD,uid=1000,gid=1000,dir_mode=0750,file_mode=0640,noauto,user,exec 0 0 [0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ mount |grep div //zdmybook/DIVERSE on /mnt/diverse type cifs (rw,mand,nosuid,nodev) The fstab entry on the 8.04 box: //zdmybook/DIVERSE /mnt/Diverse smbfs username=USER,password=PASSWORd,uid=1000,gid=1001,noauto,user,noatime 0 0 And as an example, this time from the 8.04: [0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ touch /mnt/diverse/123 [0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -l /mnt/diverse/123 -rwxr--r-- 1 lisbeth zerodogg 0 2008-10-21 08:53 /mnt/diverse/123 [0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ mount|\grep div //zdmybook/DIVERSE on /mnt/diverse type cifs (rw,mand,noexec,nosuid,nodev) [0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ LC_ALL=C apt-cache policy smbfs smbfs: Installed: 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.5 Candidate: 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.5 [0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 8.04.1 Release:8.04 [0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -a Linux lisbeth 2.6.24-21-generic #1 SMP Mon Aug 25 16:57:51 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: Binary package hint: smbfs System info: smbfs: Installed: 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3 Candidate: 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3 Description:Ubuntu 8.10 Release:8.10 [0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -a Linux firefly 2.6.27-7-generic #1 SMP Fri Oct 17 22:24:30 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux Expected results: CIFS mounts keeps working after upgrade. Results: After upgrading from 8.04 to 8.10 (roughly one week ago, on the 23rd of Oct 08) using update-manager -d my CIFS mounts stopped working properly. I did not change any settings between them, and I have another machine on this network that is still running 8.04 and that doesn't have any problems. They mount fine, and I can, with some effort, copy and read files from it (though I have to do it manually, as many programs will whine). As an example (here /mnt/diverse is my cifs mountpoint, mounted from a MyBook network drive): [0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -l /mnt/diverse/test ls: cannot access /mnt/diverse/test: No such file or directory [2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ touch /mnt/diverse/test touch: setting times of `/mnt/diverse/test': Not a directory [1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -l /mnt/diverse/test -rwxr--r-- 1 zerodogg zerodogg 0 Oct 21 08:39 /mnt/diverse/test [0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -l /mnt/diverse/test2 ls: cannot access /mnt/diverse/test2: No such file or directory [2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ touch test2 [0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug 286851] Re: CVE-2008-3658,2008-3659,2008-3660
** Visibility changed to: Public -- CVE-2008-3658,2008-3659,2008-3660 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286851 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 286878] [NEW] utf8_decode bug
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: php5
release ubuntu intrepid beta
php5 5.2.6-2ubuntu4
does not decode properly the right single quote rsquot char(')
utf8 \xE2\x80\x99 code is translated to question mark (?)
** Affects: php5 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
utf8_decode bug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286878
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 227410] Re: [SRU] catalog Backup fails because .my.cnf is not read
** Tags removed: verification-done -- [SRU] catalog Backup fails because .my.cnf is not read https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227410 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 228693] Re: [SRU] bacula-director-pgsql postinstall broken
The current version in hardy-proposed queue does this in debian/bacula- director-pgsql.postinst: - if dpkg --compare-versions lt 2.2.8-5ubuntu1 + if dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt 2.2.8-5ubuntu1 This still looks wrong for fresh installations. If this is an upgrade quirk, it must be lt-nl. Should that be fixed with another upload, or will the code that is run there do the right thing for fresh installations as well? ** Changed in: bacula (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: Triaged = Incomplete -- [SRU] bacula-director-pgsql postinstall broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228693 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 282733] Re: Winbind deamon segfaults regularly
I compiled the Samba 3.2.4 package from Debian which solved this problem so it would appear that my segfaults are indeed related to the fix mentioned in the changelog for 3.2.4 -- Winbind deamon segfaults regularly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282733 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 286678] Re: Samba transfer of multiple files very slow
Perhaps it is not a regression - I reinstalled from scratch, but this time did not add the ubuntu-desktop package and created a Samba share directly in /etc/smb.conf rather than through the GUI. The transfer time now seems to be similar to what I experienced in Hardy. Maybe it's a bad interaction with all the extra services install by ubuntu-desktop? -- Samba transfer of multiple files very slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286678 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 239302] Re: Setting squid's udp_incoming_address address to 127.0.0.1 stop its DNS requests working
Is there a reason you're not using udp_outgoing_address? Solved the problem for me. -- Setting squid's udp_incoming_address address to 127.0.0.1 stop its DNS requests working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239302 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 286643] Re: bacula client configuration is broken out of the box
Hi Scott, Thanks for taking the time to get in touch with the Ubuntu Development team. We understand that bacula is planning to send a couple of developers to Fosscamp, and think that might be an appropriate forum to collaborate on a final solution. I'll attend Fooscamp and I'm ready to discuss this issue with them. Is is this an acceptable solution for you? ** Changed in: bacula (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High Status: New = Confirmed -- bacula client configuration is broken out of the box https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286643 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 227848] Re: boot order wrong for iscsi
** Also affects: ubuntu-release-notes Importance: Undecided Status: New -- boot order wrong for iscsi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227848 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to open-iscsi in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 286643] Re: bacula client configuration is broken out of the box
I would just like to present my opinion on this one... This change was introduced in Debian as fix for Debian bug 367105: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=367105 Both configurations have valid use cases. I'm kind of in favor of having bacula file daemon listening only on localhost, as it is now. Why? Here is why... Bacula will never work out of box, cause of lots of configuration options that should be changed after installation. Changing listening IP address is just a tip of an iceberg. On the other hand, people that don't have any clue about bacula, and are just testing the software, are in danger. I would advise not changing default at least until we solve bug #222558 - each bacula client and daemon have the same password. This is cause password is generated on compile time. IMHO, talking about this and working on this issue should be post-intrepid. -- bacula client configuration is broken out of the box https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286643 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 286643] Re: bacula client configuration is broken out of the box
On Tuesday 21 October 2008 18:36:11 Mathias Gug wrote: Hi Scott, Thanks for taking the time to get in touch with the Ubuntu Development team. We understand that bacula is planning to send a couple of developers to Fosscamp, and think that might be an appropriate forum to collaborate on a final solution. I'll attend Fooscamp and I'm ready to discuss this issue with them. Is is this an acceptable solution for you? I won't speak for Scott for the above question, but I will be attending FossCamp, and would be more than happy to provide as much help as I can to arrive at solutions for all problems, concerns or questions you may have about Bacula. Kern Sibbald Bacula Project Manager -- bacula client configuration is broken out of the box https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286643 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
