[Bug 311864] [NEW] reports wrong version?

2008-12-27 Thread ArtM
Public bug reported:

The reported version number of samba in Intrepid is 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.3.
This causes sadms to fail when trying to join the machine to a windows
domain, as it thinks samba is reporting version 2.  This was not a
problem in Gutsy when I joined my machine to my windows domain.  After
reinstalling Ubuntu, sadms breaks.

** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
reports wrong version?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311864
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 50385] Re: samba can't be launched by a normal user (qemu related)

2008-12-27 Thread Rich
Confirming bug on Intrepid. :/

-- 
samba can't be launched by a normal user (qemu related)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/50385
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 311826] [NEW] package mysql-server-5.0 5.0.67-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2008-12-27 Thread lrkwz
Public bug reported:

~ $ sudo apt-get install mysql-server
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
  libhtml-template-perl mysql-server-5.0
Suggested packages:
  libipc-sharedcache-perl tinyca mailx
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  libhtml-template-perl mysql-server mysql-server-5.0
0 upgraded, 3 newly installed, 0 to remove and 5 not upgraded.
Need to get 27.0MB of archives.
After this operation, 87.9MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? 
Get:1 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main mysql-server-5.0 
5.0.67-0ubuntu6 [26.8MB]
Get:2 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main libhtml-template-perl 2.9-1 
[65.8kB]
Get:3 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main mysql-server 5.0.67-0ubuntu6 
[54.9kB]
Fetched 27.0MB in 41s (644kB/s)
Preconfiguring packages ...
Selecting previously deselected package mysql-server-5.0.
(Reading database ... 144140 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking mysql-server-5.0 (from .../mysql-server-5.0_5.0.67-0ubuntu6_i386.deb) 
...
Selecting previously deselected package libhtml-template-perl.
Unpacking libhtml-template-perl (from .../libhtml-template-perl_2.9-1_all.deb) 
...
Selecting previously deselected package mysql-server.
Unpacking mysql-server (from .../mysql-server_5.0.67-0ubuntu6_all.deb) ...
Processing triggers for man-db ...
Setting up mysql-server-5.0 (5.0.67-0ubuntu6) ...
 * Stopping MySQL database server mysqld [ OK ] 
Reloading AppArmor profiles : done.
 * Starting MySQL database server mysqld [fail] 
invoke-rc.d: initscript mysql, action "start" failed.
dpkg: error processing mysql-server-5.0 (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Setting up libhtml-template-perl (2.9-1) ...
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of mysql-server:
 mysql-server depends on mysql-server-5.0; however:
  Package mysql-server-5.0 is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing mysql-server (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
No apport report written because the error message indicates its a followup 
error from a previous failure.
  Errors were encountered while processing:
 mysql-server-5.0
 mysql-server
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

ProblemType: Package
Architecture: i386
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10
ErrorMessage: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Package: mysql-server-5.0 5.0.67-0ubuntu6
SourcePackage: mysql-dfsg-5.0
Title: package mysql-server-5.0 5.0.67-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: 
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Uname: Linux 2.6.27-9-generic i686

** Affects: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package

-- 
package mysql-server-5.0 5.0.67-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess 
post-installation script returned error exit status 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311826
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.0 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 311826] Re: package mysql-server-5.0 5.0.67-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2008-12-27 Thread lrkwz

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20768518/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.gz"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20768519/DpkgTerminalLog.gz

-- 
package mysql-server-5.0 5.0.67-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess 
post-installation script returned error exit status 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311826
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.0 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 249337] Re: bash get_cword: command not found

2008-12-27 Thread Martin Mai
Confirming this for Intrepid and for Jaunty. It's a problem in bash-
completion and the patch criser created fixes both problems. I will make
a debdiff for Jaunty. Thanks for your work.

** Changed in: bash-completion (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

** Changed in: kio-umountwrapper (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
bash get_cword: command not found
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249337
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 311826] Re: package mysql-server-5.0 5.0.67-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2008-12-27 Thread lrkwz
Sorry: port 3306 was redirected into a ssh tunnel

** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
package mysql-server-5.0 5.0.67-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess 
post-installation script returned error exit status 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311826
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.0 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Blueprint groupware-server] Groupware Server

2008-12-27 Thread perspectoff
Blueprint changed by perspectoff:

Whiteboard changed to:

2006-12+21 khaeru: might this be handled by the ubuntu-server-tasks spec?
é
21/12/2006 - I think we should pick an existing suite, i.e. hula and then 
create the ubiquitous middleware to achieve what we want

13/07/2007 (stephan-impilinux) - We have recently evaluated a load of
these solutions and have some professional experience in it.

2008-06-07 (pixelpapst) - Just a quick reminder that the hula project
ist effectively dead since late 2006, and the community created a fork
called "bongo project". However, by now they ripped out all of Hula's
LDAP connectivity, which makes this a very pretty but useless solution
for SmallBusinessServer.

2008-06-08  (Guy Van Sanden) Citadel seems a very good choice.  IT offers many 
features (including a Jabber server) and is completely GPL'ed.
The only caveat is that it does not have LDAP support (yet)

2008-06-19 (Art Cancro) -- yes, definitely go with Citadel.  Ubuntu
packages are already being maintained, and the project would be
delighted to cooperate with the Ubuntu team on integration issues.

2008-06-19 (Todd Hanna) I would also like to give a big +1 to Citadel.
They already have the .debs and there is even a connector to use it as
an "Exchange" replacement if you have clients using Outlook.  I have run
it without issue on Ubuntu server since version 6.06.  It's head and
shoulders above the rest at the moment..  and it is easy to setup,
update, and maintain.

2008-07-08 (Stuart Cianos) - I'll also give major points to Citadel, and
have been a longtime user of it. It is the only open-source groupware
package that is self maintaining and straightforward to configure.

2008-07-09 (Stephan Buys) - Please also dont forget Kolab (Citadel
implements the Kolab v1 format). Kolab has 3 plugins for Outlook,
support Horde Webmail, Thunderbird/Lightning and Kontact.

2008-07-09 (Guy Van Sanden) RE Kolab - Kolab is not a full groupware
AFAIK, it does not have a web interface.  Correct me if I'm wrong.

2008-07-09 (Christian Merlin) Remember also SOGo
(http://sogo.opengroupware.org/) it use LDAP for users and PostgreSQL
for database. So It could be easy to integrate with Ebox (http://ebox-
platform.com/). So Ubuntu can became an'easy and powerfull groupware
server like the commercial one.

2008-07-10 (Stephan Buys) Kolab does have a web interface (for admin and
email) through Horde (www.horde.org). Calendars, Contacts and Tasks can
be shared between Outlook/Kontact/Horde/Thunderbird

2008-07-10 - Personally I prefer bongo, however it is still in its
infancy.  It has a great UI, and is targeted at being simple to install
and use

2008-11-14 - (Guy Van Sanden) Zarafa is becoming an option too.  It was
AGPL'd recently and offers many features including CalDAV in the
upcoming 6.30 release.

2008-11-14 - (Stuart Cianos) Only the server-side components of Zarafa
were opened up... There are still numerous proprietary functions that
are unavailable in the AGPL version. There are plenty of completely open
solutions out there (Horde, Citadel, Kolab, etc.) Personally, I use
Citadel (with Funambol for push e-mail) due to its funtionality,
reliability, speed and flexibility... They also have a fantastic
developer/user community that is supportive and communicative.

2008-11-15 - (Guy Van Sanden)  @Stuart Cianos  Actually most of it seems to be 
in the AGPL version except for the client license required for Outlook usage.  
Which is logical, if you are paying for closed source outlook you should also 
pay for the connector...
I know about citadel, have been running it for 2 years but it does have some 
issues and lacks certain features like LDAP integration.

2008-11-16 (Stuart Cianos) @Guy Van Sanden: Citadel will allow you to
authenticate against any service which support the underlying
authentication of the operating system (in this case, PAM). I have used
this to authenticate users against PAM using modules such as pam_ldap;
additionally, it can automatically populate an LDAP directory with
information from its global address book for use with external clients.

2008-11-29 (Giorgio Zarrelli) I do not see eGroupware, what about it?

2008-12-01 (Guy Van Sanden) @Stuart:  I tried PAM based authentication on 
Ubuntu, but it only works with pam_unix and not pam_krb5 or pam_ldap for me.  
Though I really like Citadel in many ways, it has too many limitations to use 
it as a full-blown groupware server like Zimbra or Zarafa.  Zimbra is nice, but 
it really needs a dedicated server to run properly.
@Giorgio: eGroupWare is not a groupware server but rather a Web frontend to 
other servers. 

2008-12-01 (Giorgio Zarrelli)  @Guy. I agree on Zimbra. It's too
"expensive", not all people can afford a dedicated server just for a
groupware. Zarafa looks nice, but never tried it

Zimbra or potentially bongo are the prettiest of the groupware products
available which would make them great marketing tools for ubuntu.
However Zimbra has too many un

[Blueprint groupware-server] Groupware Server

2008-12-27 Thread perspectoff
Blueprint changed by perspectoff:

Whiteboard changed to:

2006-12+21 khaeru: might this be handled by the ubuntu-server-tasks spec?
é
21/12/2006 - I think we should pick an existing suite, i.e. hula and then 
create the ubiquitous middleware to achieve what we want

13/07/2007 (stephan-impilinux) - We have recently evaluated a load of
these solutions and have some professional experience in it.

2008-06-07 (pixelpapst) - Just a quick reminder that the hula project
ist effectively dead since late 2006, and the community created a fork
called "bongo project". However, by now they ripped out all of Hula's
LDAP connectivity, which makes this a very pretty but useless solution
for SmallBusinessServer.

2008-06-08  (Guy Van Sanden) Citadel seems a very good choice.  IT offers many 
features (including a Jabber server) and is completely GPL'ed.
The only caveat is that it does not have LDAP support (yet)

2008-06-19 (Art Cancro) -- yes, definitely go with Citadel.  Ubuntu
packages are already being maintained, and the project would be
delighted to cooperate with the Ubuntu team on integration issues.

2008-06-19 (Todd Hanna) I would also like to give a big +1 to Citadel.
They already have the .debs and there is even a connector to use it as
an "Exchange" replacement if you have clients using Outlook.  I have run
it without issue on Ubuntu server since version 6.06.  It's head and
shoulders above the rest at the moment..  and it is easy to setup,
update, and maintain.

2008-07-08 (Stuart Cianos) - I'll also give major points to Citadel, and
have been a longtime user of it. It is the only open-source groupware
package that is self maintaining and straightforward to configure.

2008-07-09 (Stephan Buys) - Please also dont forget Kolab (Citadel
implements the Kolab v1 format). Kolab has 3 plugins for Outlook,
support Horde Webmail, Thunderbird/Lightning and Kontact.

2008-07-09 (Guy Van Sanden) RE Kolab - Kolab is not a full groupware
AFAIK, it does not have a web interface.  Correct me if I'm wrong.

2008-07-09 (Christian Merlin) Remember also SOGo
(http://sogo.opengroupware.org/) it use LDAP for users and PostgreSQL
for database. So It could be easy to integrate with Ebox (http://ebox-
platform.com/). So Ubuntu can became an'easy and powerfull groupware
server like the commercial one.

2008-07-10 (Stephan Buys) Kolab does have a web interface (for admin and
email) through Horde (www.horde.org). Calendars, Contacts and Tasks can
be shared between Outlook/Kontact/Horde/Thunderbird

2008-07-10 - Personally I prefer bongo, however it is still in its
infancy.  It has a great UI, and is targeted at being simple to install
and use

2008-11-14 - (Guy Van Sanden) Zarafa is becoming an option too.  It was
AGPL'd recently and offers many features including CalDAV in the
upcoming 6.30 release.

2008-11-14 - (Stuart Cianos) Only the server-side components of Zarafa
were opened up... There are still numerous proprietary functions that
are unavailable in the AGPL version. There are plenty of completely open
solutions out there (Horde, Citadel, Kolab, etc.) Personally, I use
Citadel (with Funambol for push e-mail) due to its funtionality,
reliability, speed and flexibility... They also have a fantastic
developer/user community that is supportive and communicative.

2008-11-15 - (Guy Van Sanden)  @Stuart Cianos  Actually most of it seems to be 
in the AGPL version except for the client license required for Outlook usage.  
Which is logical, if you are paying for closed source outlook you should also 
pay for the connector...
I know about citadel, have been running it for 2 years but it does have some 
issues and lacks certain features like LDAP integration.

2008-11-16 (Stuart Cianos) @Guy Van Sanden: Citadel will allow you to
authenticate against any service which support the underlying
authentication of the operating system (in this case, PAM). I have used
this to authenticate users against PAM using modules such as pam_ldap;
additionally, it can automatically populate an LDAP directory with
information from its global address book for use with external clients.

2008-11-29 (Giorgio Zarrelli) I do not see eGroupware, what about it?

2008-12-01 (Guy Van Sanden) @Stuart:  I tried PAM based authentication on 
Ubuntu, but it only works with pam_unix and not pam_krb5 or pam_ldap for me.  
Though I really like Citadel in many ways, it has too many limitations to use 
it as a full-blown groupware server like Zimbra or Zarafa.  Zimbra is nice, but 
it really needs a dedicated server to run properly.
@Giorgio: eGroupWare is not a groupware server but rather a Web frontend to 
other servers. 

2008-12-01 (Giorgio Zarrelli)  @Guy. I agree on Zimbra. It's too
"expensive", not all people can afford a dedicated server just for a
groupware. Zarafa looks nice, but never tried it

Zimbra or potentially bongo are the prettiest of the groupware products
available which would make them great marketing tools for ubuntu.
However Zimbra has too many un

[Blueprint groupware-server] Groupware Server

2008-12-27 Thread perspectoff
Blueprint changed by perspectoff:

Whiteboard changed to:

2006-12+21 khaeru: might this be handled by the ubuntu-server-tasks spec?
é
21/12/2006 - I think we should pick an existing suite, i.e. hula and then 
create the ubiquitous middleware to achieve what we want

13/07/2007 (stephan-impilinux) - We have recently evaluated a load of
these solutions and have some professional experience in it.

2008-06-07 (pixelpapst) - Just a quick reminder that the hula project
ist effectively dead since late 2006, and the community created a fork
called "bongo project". However, by now they ripped out all of Hula's
LDAP connectivity, which makes this a very pretty but useless solution
for SmallBusinessServer.

2008-06-08  (Guy Van Sanden) Citadel seems a very good choice.  IT offers many 
features (including a Jabber server) and is completely GPL'ed.
The only caveat is that it does not have LDAP support (yet)

2008-06-19 (Art Cancro) -- yes, definitely go with Citadel.  Ubuntu
packages are already being maintained, and the project would be
delighted to cooperate with the Ubuntu team on integration issues.

2008-06-19 (Todd Hanna) I would also like to give a big +1 to Citadel.
They already have the .debs and there is even a connector to use it as
an "Exchange" replacement if you have clients using Outlook.  I have run
it without issue on Ubuntu server since version 6.06.  It's head and
shoulders above the rest at the moment..  and it is easy to setup,
update, and maintain.

2008-07-08 (Stuart Cianos) - I'll also give major points to Citadel, and
have been a longtime user of it. It is the only open-source groupware
package that is self maintaining and straightforward to configure.

2008-07-09 (Stephan Buys) - Please also dont forget Kolab (Citadel
implements the Kolab v1 format). Kolab has 3 plugins for Outlook,
support Horde Webmail, Thunderbird/Lightning and Kontact.

2008-07-09 (Guy Van Sanden) RE Kolab - Kolab is not a full groupware
AFAIK, it does not have a web interface.  Correct me if I'm wrong.

2008-07-09 (Christian Merlin) Remember also SOGo
(http://sogo.opengroupware.org/) it use LDAP for users and PostgreSQL
for database. So It could be easy to integrate with Ebox (http://ebox-
platform.com/). So Ubuntu can became an'easy and powerfull groupware
server like the commercial one.

2008-07-10 (Stephan Buys) Kolab does have a web interface (for admin and
email) through Horde (www.horde.org). Calendars, Contacts and Tasks can
be shared between Outlook/Kontact/Horde/Thunderbird

2008-07-10 - Personally I prefer bongo, however it is still in its
infancy.  It has a great UI, and is targeted at being simple to install
and use

2008-11-14 - (Guy Van Sanden) Zarafa is becoming an option too.  It was
AGPL'd recently and offers many features including CalDAV in the
upcoming 6.30 release.

2008-11-14 - (Stuart Cianos) Only the server-side components of Zarafa
were opened up... There are still numerous proprietary functions that
are unavailable in the AGPL version. There are plenty of completely open
solutions out there (Horde, Citadel, Kolab, etc.) Personally, I use
Citadel (with Funambol for push e-mail) due to its funtionality,
reliability, speed and flexibility... They also have a fantastic
developer/user community that is supportive and communicative.

2008-11-15 - (Guy Van Sanden)  @Stuart Cianos  Actually most of it seems to be 
in the AGPL version except for the client license required for Outlook usage.  
Which is logical, if you are paying for closed source outlook you should also 
pay for the connector...
I know about citadel, have been running it for 2 years but it does have some 
issues and lacks certain features like LDAP integration.

2008-11-16 (Stuart Cianos) @Guy Van Sanden: Citadel will allow you to
authenticate against any service which support the underlying
authentication of the operating system (in this case, PAM). I have used
this to authenticate users against PAM using modules such as pam_ldap;
additionally, it can automatically populate an LDAP directory with
information from its global address book for use with external clients.

2008-11-29 (Giorgio Zarrelli) I do not see eGroupware, what about it?

2008-12-01 (Guy Van Sanden) @Stuart:  I tried PAM based authentication on 
Ubuntu, but it only works with pam_unix and not pam_krb5 or pam_ldap for me.  
Though I really like Citadel in many ways, it has too many limitations to use 
it as a full-blown groupware server like Zimbra or Zarafa.  Zimbra is nice, but 
it really needs a dedicated server to run properly.
@Giorgio: eGroupWare is not a groupware server but rather a Web frontend to 
other servers. 

2008-12-01 (Giorgio Zarrelli)  @Guy. I agree on Zimbra. It's too
"expensive", not all people can afford a dedicated server just for a
groupware. Zarafa looks nice, but never tried it

Zimbra or potentially bongo are the prettiest of the groupware products
available which would make them great marketing tools for ubuntu.
However Zimbra has too many un

[Blueprint groupware-server] Groupware Server

2008-12-27 Thread perspectoff
Blueprint changed by perspectoff:

Whiteboard changed to:

2006-12+21 khaeru: might this be handled by the ubuntu-server-tasks spec?
é
21/12/2006 - I think we should pick an existing suite, i.e. hula and then 
create the ubiquitous middleware to achieve what we want

13/07/2007 (stephan-impilinux) - We have recently evaluated a load of
these solutions and have some professional experience in it.

2008-06-07 (pixelpapst) - Just a quick reminder that the hula project
ist effectively dead since late 2006, and the community created a fork
called "bongo project". However, by now they ripped out all of Hula's
LDAP connectivity, which makes this a very pretty but useless solution
for SmallBusinessServer.

2008-06-08  (Guy Van Sanden) Citadel seems a very good choice.  IT offers many 
features (including a Jabber server) and is completely GPL'ed.
The only caveat is that it does not have LDAP support (yet)

2008-06-19 (Art Cancro) -- yes, definitely go with Citadel.  Ubuntu
packages are already being maintained, and the project would be
delighted to cooperate with the Ubuntu team on integration issues.

2008-06-19 (Todd Hanna) I would also like to give a big +1 to Citadel.
They already have the .debs and there is even a connector to use it as
an "Exchange" replacement if you have clients using Outlook.  I have run
it without issue on Ubuntu server since version 6.06.  It's head and
shoulders above the rest at the moment..  and it is easy to setup,
update, and maintain.

2008-07-08 (Stuart Cianos) - I'll also give major points to Citadel, and
have been a longtime user of it. It is the only open-source groupware
package that is self maintaining and straightforward to configure.

2008-07-09 (Stephan Buys) - Please also dont forget Kolab (Citadel
implements the Kolab v1 format). Kolab has 3 plugins for Outlook,
support Horde Webmail, Thunderbird/Lightning and Kontact.

2008-07-09 (Guy Van Sanden) RE Kolab - Kolab is not a full groupware
AFAIK, it does not have a web interface.  Correct me if I'm wrong.

2008-07-09 (Christian Merlin) Remember also SOGo
(http://sogo.opengroupware.org/) it use LDAP for users and PostgreSQL
for database. So It could be easy to integrate with Ebox (http://ebox-
platform.com/). So Ubuntu can became an'easy and powerfull groupware
server like the commercial one.

2008-07-10 (Stephan Buys) Kolab does have a web interface (for admin and
email) through Horde (www.horde.org). Calendars, Contacts and Tasks can
be shared between Outlook/Kontact/Horde/Thunderbird

2008-07-10 - Personally I prefer bongo, however it is still in its
infancy.  It has a great UI, and is targeted at being simple to install
and use

2008-11-14 - (Guy Van Sanden) Zarafa is becoming an option too.  It was
AGPL'd recently and offers many features including CalDAV in the
upcoming 6.30 release.

2008-11-14 - (Stuart Cianos) Only the server-side components of Zarafa
were opened up... There are still numerous proprietary functions that
are unavailable in the AGPL version. There are plenty of completely open
solutions out there (Horde, Citadel, Kolab, etc.) Personally, I use
Citadel (with Funambol for push e-mail) due to its funtionality,
reliability, speed and flexibility... They also have a fantastic
developer/user community that is supportive and communicative.

2008-11-15 - (Guy Van Sanden)  @Stuart Cianos  Actually most of it seems to be 
in the AGPL version except for the client license required for Outlook usage.  
Which is logical, if you are paying for closed source outlook you should also 
pay for the connector...
I know about citadel, have been running it for 2 years but it does have some 
issues and lacks certain features like LDAP integration.

2008-11-16 (Stuart Cianos) @Guy Van Sanden: Citadel will allow you to
authenticate against any service which support the underlying
authentication of the operating system (in this case, PAM). I have used
this to authenticate users against PAM using modules such as pam_ldap;
additionally, it can automatically populate an LDAP directory with
information from its global address book for use with external clients.

2008-11-29 (Giorgio Zarrelli) I do not see eGroupware, what about it?

2008-12-01 (Guy Van Sanden) @Stuart:  I tried PAM based authentication on 
Ubuntu, but it only works with pam_unix and not pam_krb5 or pam_ldap for me.  
Though I really like Citadel in many ways, it has too many limitations to use 
it as a full-blown groupware server like Zimbra or Zarafa.  Zimbra is nice, but 
it really needs a dedicated server to run properly.
@Giorgio: eGroupWare is not a groupware server but rather a Web frontend to 
other servers. 

2008-12-01 (Giorgio Zarrelli)  @Guy. I agree on Zimbra. It's too
"expensive", not all people can afford a dedicated server just for a
groupware. Zarafa looks nice, but never tried it

Zimbra or potentially bongo are the prettiest of the groupware products
available which would make them great marketing tools for ubuntu.
However Zimbra has too many un

[Blueprint groupware-server] Groupware Server

2008-12-27 Thread perspectoff
Blueprint changed by perspectoff:

Whiteboard changed to:

2006-12+21 khaeru: might this be handled by the ubuntu-server-tasks spec?
é
21/12/2006 - I think we should pick an existing suite, i.e. hula and then 
create the ubiquitous middleware to achieve what we want

13/07/2007 (stephan-impilinux) - We have recently evaluated a load of
these solutions and have some professional experience in it.

2008-06-07 (pixelpapst) - Just a quick reminder that the hula project
ist effectively dead since late 2006, and the community created a fork
called "bongo project". However, by now they ripped out all of Hula's
LDAP connectivity, which makes this a very pretty but useless solution
for SmallBusinessServer.

2008-06-08  (Guy Van Sanden) Citadel seems a very good choice.  IT offers many 
features (including a Jabber server) and is completely GPL'ed.
The only caveat is that it does not have LDAP support (yet)

2008-06-19 (Art Cancro) -- yes, definitely go with Citadel.  Ubuntu
packages are already being maintained, and the project would be
delighted to cooperate with the Ubuntu team on integration issues.

2008-06-19 (Todd Hanna) I would also like to give a big +1 to Citadel.
They already have the .debs and there is even a connector to use it as
an "Exchange" replacement if you have clients using Outlook.  I have run
it without issue on Ubuntu server since version 6.06.  It's head and
shoulders above the rest at the moment..  and it is easy to setup,
update, and maintain.

2008-07-08 (Stuart Cianos) - I'll also give major points to Citadel, and
have been a longtime user of it. It is the only open-source groupware
package that is self maintaining and straightforward to configure.

2008-07-09 (Stephan Buys) - Please also dont forget Kolab (Citadel
implements the Kolab v1 format). Kolab has 3 plugins for Outlook,
support Horde Webmail, Thunderbird/Lightning and Kontact.

2008-07-09 (Guy Van Sanden) RE Kolab - Kolab is not a full groupware
AFAIK, it does not have a web interface.  Correct me if I'm wrong.

2008-07-09 (Christian Merlin) Remember also SOGo
(http://sogo.opengroupware.org/) it use LDAP for users and PostgreSQL
for database. So It could be easy to integrate with Ebox (http://ebox-
platform.com/). So Ubuntu can became an'easy and powerfull groupware
server like the commercial one.

2008-07-10 (Stephan Buys) Kolab does have a web interface (for admin and
email) through Horde (www.horde.org). Calendars, Contacts and Tasks can
be shared between Outlook/Kontact/Horde/Thunderbird

2008-07-10 - Personally I prefer bongo, however it is still in its
infancy.  It has a great UI, and is targeted at being simple to install
and use

2008-11-14 - (Guy Van Sanden) Zarafa is becoming an option too.  It was
AGPL'd recently and offers many features including CalDAV in the
upcoming 6.30 release.

2008-11-14 - (Stuart Cianos) Only the server-side components of Zarafa
were opened up... There are still numerous proprietary functions that
are unavailable in the AGPL version. There are plenty of completely open
solutions out there (Horde, Citadel, Kolab, etc.) Personally, I use
Citadel (with Funambol for push e-mail) due to its funtionality,
reliability, speed and flexibility... They also have a fantastic
developer/user community that is supportive and communicative.

2008-11-15 - (Guy Van Sanden)  @Stuart Cianos  Actually most of it seems to be 
in the AGPL version except for the client license required for Outlook usage.  
Which is logical, if you are paying for closed source outlook you should also 
pay for the connector...
I know about citadel, have been running it for 2 years but it does have some 
issues and lacks certain features like LDAP integration.

2008-11-16 (Stuart Cianos) @Guy Van Sanden: Citadel will allow you to
authenticate against any service which support the underlying
authentication of the operating system (in this case, PAM). I have used
this to authenticate users against PAM using modules such as pam_ldap;
additionally, it can automatically populate an LDAP directory with
information from its global address book for use with external clients.

2008-11-29 (Giorgio Zarrelli) I do not see eGroupware, what about it?

2008-12-01 (Guy Van Sanden) @Stuart:  I tried PAM based authentication on 
Ubuntu, but it only works with pam_unix and not pam_krb5 or pam_ldap for me.  
Though I really like Citadel in many ways, it has too many limitations to use 
it as a full-blown groupware server like Zimbra or Zarafa.  Zimbra is nice, but 
it really needs a dedicated server to run properly.
@Giorgio: eGroupWare is not a groupware server but rather a Web frontend to 
other servers. 

2008-12-01 (Giorgio Zarrelli)  @Guy. I agree on Zimbra. It's too
"expensive", not all people can afford a dedicated server just for a
groupware. Zarafa looks nice, but never tried it

Zimbra or potentially bongo are the prettiest of the groupware products
available which would make them great marketing tools for ubuntu.
However Zimbra has too many un

[Bug 162082] Re: PHP fastcgi with PHP_FCGI_CHILDREN doesn't kill children when parent is killed

2008-12-27 Thread Yann Hamon
Ah, and it seems to affect python processes, too.

-- 
PHP fastcgi with PHP_FCGI_CHILDREN doesn't kill children when parent is killed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162082
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 162082] Re: PHP fastcgi with PHP_FCGI_CHILDREN doesn't kill children when parent is killed

2008-12-27 Thread Yann Hamon
I have the same issue but without PHP_FCGI_CHILDREN set.

y...@jok:/proc/15237$ ps -ef | fgrep 15237
ufr_doc  15237 1  0 04:20 ?00:00:00 /usr/lib/cgi-bin/php5 -d 
magic_quotes_gpc=off
yann 26564 24593  0 14:15 pts/000:00:00 fgrep 15237

y...@jok:/proc/15237$ sudo cat environ
PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/binPWD=/nfs/www/fr/doc/binSHLVL=0PHP_FCGI_MAX_REQUESTS=1000

-- 
PHP fastcgi with PHP_FCGI_CHILDREN doesn't kill children when parent is killed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162082
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs