[Bug 312648] Re: package samba 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new post-removal script returned error exit status 132
Quoting the log: Unpacking replacement samba ... Illegal instruction dpkg: warning - old post-removal script returned error exit status 132 dpkg - trying script from the new package instead ... Illegal instruction dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/samba_2%3a3.2.3-1ubuntu3.3_i386.deb (--unpack): These 'illegal instruction' errors (of which there's more than one in the log) appear to come from the shell itself. I'm marking this bug as invalid, since this is not a bug in the samba package; bug #280602 already addresses the larger issue. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Invalid -- package samba 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new post-removal script returned error exit status 132 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/312648 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 244801] Re: pam_smbpass(kscreensaver:auth): unrecognized option [missingok]
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 234786 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234786 marking as a duplicate of bug #234786. This bug is resolved in Ubuntu 8.10 and beyond. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 234786 dovecot-auth: pam_smbpass(dovecot:auth): unrecognized option [missingok] -- pam_smbpass(kscreensaver:auth): unrecognized option [missingok] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244801 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 342580] Re: smbcontrol reports Segmentation fault
Thank you for reporting this bug and helping to improve Ubuntu. This bug is not present in the version of samba in the upcoming Ubuntu 9.04 release, therefore I'm marking this report as fixed. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- smbcontrol reports Segmentation fault https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342580 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 342056] Re: Samba automatic account creation assumes local accounts
This additional variable is unnecessary, the check should simply modify the default for the 'GENERATE_SMBPASSWD' variable if anything. Also, I don't agree that it's correct to assume users in LDAP implies samba in LDAP. Even if it does, the samba package won't read from LDAP out of the box, it will require additional configuration after installation - so I don't think it's unreasonable to continue to populate passdb.tdb by default. And normally, 'getent passwd' will not enumerate users from LDAP. It's strange that it does in your case. -- Samba automatic account creation assumes local accounts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342056 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 242869] Re: dnsmasq's dhcp blocked to clients by firestarter
A useful bit of information here: ISC dhcpd uses raw sockets to grab incoming packets before they pass through the IP stack and IP tables, it therefore doesn't suffer from problems caused by broken firewall rules. Dnsmasq uses standard IP sockets so that all incoming packets are filtered by iptables. It is therefore not the case that having dhcpd work with firestarter means that the problem is solved and firestarter just has to do the same for dnsmasq as for dhcpd. WIth dhpcd the problem is moot, but with dnsmasq firestarter really has to get it right. From the dnsmasq FAQ: Q: I'm using dnsmasq on a machine with the Firestarter firewall, and DHCP doesn't work. What's the problem? A: This a variant on the iptables problem. Explicit details on how to proceed can be found at http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2005q3/000431.html Cheers, SImon. -- dnsmasq's dhcp blocked to clients by firestarter https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242869 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 311350] Re: Auto mount of windows shares doesn't work.
The script /etc/network/if-up.d/mountnfs is meant to mount both nfs and cifs mounts present in /etc/fstab when the network interface comes up. This works just fine for me in the case of NFS mounts; I haven't tested with cifs, but I don't see anything in that script that should fail. (Unless NM is secretly bypassing this code and reinventing the wheel by mounting only NFS mounts, in which case that would be an NM bug.) -- Auto mount of windows shares doesn't work. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311350 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 298680] Re: samba restart broken in intrepid
Is this a recurring problem, or did it just happen the one time? If the problem is not reproducible, then we'll have to close this report since there's not enough information here to reproduce the problem. -- samba restart broken in intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298680 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 323601] Re: [FFe] Upgrade to likewise-open 5 for Jaunty
Fine for me, then. -- [FFe] Upgrade to likewise-open 5 for Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/323601 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to likewise-open in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 328436] Re: SASL/GSSAPI problem in OpenLDAP
Yes, it now works for me too. -- SASL/GSSAPI problem in OpenLDAP https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328436 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 323601] Re: [FFe] Upgrade to likewise-open 5 for Jaunty
Approved as long as someone from server team is assigned to watch over bugs and deal with any issues that come up. ** Changed in: likewise-open (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- [FFe] Upgrade to likewise-open 5 for Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/323601 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to likewise-open in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 270395] Re: cannot resolve windows host name
The description in this bug report is complete; it is a request to enable the WINS NSS module by default. However, I'm going to have to mark this bug 'wontfix', because the nss_wins module isn't mature enough to enable it by default, and using it can cause recursion problems for apps in a variety of cases. Some details can be found in Debian bug #459972. I believe anyone in this situation is better off deploying DNS than bolting WINS onto their Ubuntu systems. Microsoft appears to agree, given that their current domain technology (Active Directory) uses DNS. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Won't Fix -- cannot resolve windows host name https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270395 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 342617] [NEW] package postfix 2.5.5-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 75
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Masood masoodaboo...@yahoo.com wrote: Public bug reported: Binary package hint: postfix Hi, This is the third time that I have posted this error and also, provided more information by posting the out put of apt-get install postfix but I have not received any feedback yet. I am re-posting the output of the sudo apt-get install postfix so that you can see the error I get with each Ubuntu update which results in Ubuntu updates not to be installed properly. it seems that this problem has made my computer somewhat slow too. I have done all that i could do but no luck so far and I need help please. mas...@masood-rocks!:~$ sudo apt-get install postfix Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done postfix is already the newest version. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 31 not fully installed or removed. After this operation, 0B of additional disk space will be used. Setting up postfix (2.5.5-1) ... Postfix configuration was not changed. If you need to make changes, edit /etc/postfix/main.cf (and others) as needed. To view Postfix configuration values, see postconf(1). After modifying main.cf, be sure to run '/etc/init.d/postfix reload'. Running newaliases newaliases: warning: valid_hostname: invalid character 33(decimal): masood-ROCKS! newaliases: fatal: file /etc/postfix/main.cf: parameter myhostname: bad parameter value: masood-ROCKS! Is the hostname of your computer masood-ROCKS!? Is so it's probably an issue with the ! character. You might try temporarily changing your hostname then running sudo dpkg-reconfigure postfix. -- Party On, Adam -- package postfix 2.5.5-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 75 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342617 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 216358] Re: Samba crashes repeatedly to assert_uid
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 02:39:53AM -, Paul Dufresne wrote: I now tend to think this is caused by the -1 not being casted to appropriate type in: setresgid(-1,gid,-1); and in: assert_uid(-1, uid); in lib/sec_util.c as I said in bug #314657 causing problems on 64 bits machines. Absolutely not. You don't have to cast integer types when passing them as function arguments, you just have to have a proper function prototype - which Samba has for all functions it uses. This can be confirmed by grepping for warnings in the build logs. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org -- Samba crashes repeatedly to assert_uid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216358 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 323601] Re: [FFe] Upgrade to likewise-open 5 for Jaunty
I'll do it. I'm in close contact with upstream so that all bugs get handled quickly. ** Changed in: likewise-open (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Thierry Carrez (ttx) Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- [FFe] Upgrade to likewise-open 5 for Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/323601 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to likewise-open in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 270395] Re: cannot resolve windows host name
Just to be clear. Are you suggesting that to have my Ubuntu laptop to connect to my Windows desktop on my 3 PC LAN, I've to setup an internal DNS server? Or do I miss something? -- cannot resolve windows host name https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270395 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 242956] Re: Bind9 (8.04) not returning 'ad' flag when dnssec is enabled
In my (limited) experience, the server only responds with the AD bit set which it can validate the DNSSEC records on the domain. As there is no root key in the DNS now, this means you must configure trust anchors on your recursive nameserver. My question would be: is your recursive DNS server actually able to validate the DNSSEC records? If you operate the server, you should be able to examine the dnssec logs and determine if the nameserver is able to validate the DNSSEC records. -- Bind9 (8.04) not returning 'ad' flag when dnssec is enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242956 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 270395] Re: cannot resolve windows host name
This is because using 'ping host' attempts to look up a host using DNS. Using 'smb://host/' uses lmhosts. If you were to go to Windows and type 'ping host' it would fail the same way. -- cannot resolve windows host name https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270395 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 216358] Re: Samba crashes repeatedly to assert_uid
Yeah, I began to realise I was wrong before reading you comment. I have a new, I hope better hypothesis now. It look a bit stupid, but maybe it is trying to become a deleted user. For ZDS (original poster) it would have means he would have deleted the nobody user (normally nobody have id 65534 in /etc/passwd, but I remember a time where I was deleting it for feeling my system more secure. Maybe even the user nogroup in /etc/group. For Berni, it would be not having a group 1001 in /etc/group Based on Failed to set uid privileges to (-1,1001) now set to (0,0) info. Try to look if sudo /etc/group | grep 1001 returns something. -- Samba crashes repeatedly to assert_uid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216358 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 216358] Re: Samba crashes repeatedly to assert_uid
For Berni, I meant: sudo cat /etc/group | grep 1001 of course. -- Samba crashes repeatedly to assert_uid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216358 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 341816] Re: samba PANIC: failed to set uid
Thank you for this bug report. Many other similar bugs have been reported, some on Ubuntu, sometimes on Fedora, or even in FreeBSD. In Ubuntu I speak of bug #216358, bug #314657 and bug #229654. Could you check if user ID 11789 really exist by doing: sudo cat /etc/passwd | grep 11789 sudo cat /etc/group | grep 11789 and if so, try to become this user with su user and issue ulimit -u and give the result here. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- samba PANIC: failed to set uid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341816 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 216358] Re: Samba crashes repeatedly to assert_uid
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 03:01:40AM -, Paul Dufresne wrote: It look a bit stupid, but maybe it is trying to become a deleted user. For ZDS (original poster) it would have means he would have deleted the nobody user (normally nobody have id 65534 in /etc/passwd, but I remember a time where I was deleting it for feeling my system more secure. Maybe even the user nogroup in /etc/group. Sorry, not this either. The setuid() calls don't require that the uid has a matching name on the system. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org -- Samba crashes repeatedly to assert_uid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216358 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
