[Bug 339966] Re: dangerous action: dovecot-postfix force-installs new conf file
Right, (2) is an error from previous upload and (1) is an oversight (i didn't copy-paste it :). I'm fixing that and at the same time I would like to discuss some things. What would user expect on purge/removal of dovecot-postfix? At the moment, if the user removes dovecot-postfix, /etc/dovecot/dovecot- postfix.conf remains and nothing changes for the user. Is that ok? Wouldn't the user expect to have dovecot-postfix integration removed? And how about purge? I've would also like to have postfix's master.cf and main.cf (in the state they are before installing dovecot-postfix) in /var/backups/dovecot/, so that on purge we can set up environment that was there before installation. -- dangerous action: dovecot-postfix force-installs new conf file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339966 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 345330] Re: smbfs, samba samba-common are uninstallable
Well, it should be allowed to proceed only if you are sure that smbfs will work with all later versions of libsmbclient, which might not be the case. Anyway, the problem here seems to be that you enabled -updates or -security at one point, got samba common...-1ubuntu3.4 installed. Then -updates or -security were disabled and you were left with only the release packages... So installing smbfs would try to install -1ubuntu3. I'll close this as Invalid since you solved it. I'd recommend adding the -security repository again, apt-get update and apt-get upgrade to get all the packages at the -1ubuntu3.4 level. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- smbfs, samba samba-common are uninstallable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345330 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 216358] Re: Samba crashes repeatedly to assert_uid
Proposed patch for Intrepid Packages also available for testing in my PPA (2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.6~ppa1) at https://launchpad.net/~ttx/+archive/ppa I can't really reproduce the issue in the first place, so I'd welcome some testing to make sure this is indeed the right fix :) ** Attachment added: samba_3.2.3-1ubuntu3.6.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24145405/samba_3.2.3-1ubuntu3.6.debdiff -- Samba crashes repeatedly to assert_uid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216358 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 288616] Re: Packages depending on JRE might not have a usable JRE when configured
So it can't be fixed by just working around it in commons-daemon. We need the JRE to be fully installed before it's put in use. Solutions left include: 1- PreDepend 2- Fix apt 3- Make default-jre-headless depend on both openjdk6-lib and openjdk6-jre-headless Reopening tasks for apt and java-common, since I'm still unsure why (3) isn't the easiest solution. ** Summary changed: - Tomcat 6 fails to start during install + Packages depending on JRE might not have a usable JRE when configured ** Changed in: commons-daemon (Ubuntu) Assignee: Thierry Carrez (ttx) = (unassigned) Status: Confirmed = Invalid ** Changed in: java-common (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New ** Changed in: commons-daemon (Ubuntu Intrepid) Status: New = Invalid ** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Packages depending on JRE might not have a usable JRE when configured https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/288616 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 345899] [NEW] should the full licence be included?
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ec2-ami-tools I'm not hugely familiar with debian/ubuntu packaging policy, but should the full text of the licence be included in the copyright file? At the moment there is a minimal amount of legalese and a URL to the full licence. ** Affects: ec2-ami-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- should the full licence be included? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345899 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ec2-ami-tools in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 216358] Re: Samba crashes repeatedly to assert_uid
Well, I don't really can test it either, so it would have to be tested
by others.
I don't really understand, how this race between AIO and setresuid would affect
the result of setresuid.
Seems it's fix the result of the (Asynchronous IO), not of setresuid.
But I have an even much bigger problem with this.
My understanding of the problem (which could well be wrong), is that Linux have
effective user ID by thread,
rather than by process (this is one of the big guess I make that are often
wrong).
But POSIX works with uid on process rather than threads (yes, an other guess).
So, glibc guys, think that they should change effective uid of other threads of
the process to respect the POSIX standard.
Which does make sense to me (even if it may cause problems like race condition
with AIO, and maybe other stuff).
Now, my really big problem with all this, is that glibc seems to have made a
big error.
They seems to think that setresuid is a syscall in the POSIX standards, and
setreuid is not.
After all, they seems to have made setresuid ('being smart' about changing
other threads of the process).
But it is reverse, as far as I know: setresuid is not part of any POSIX
standard, but setreuid is.
Need to find back the pdf where I have read that.
Now, what would seems like a better patch for me, would be to simply make a
loop to retry 3 to 5 times,
the setresuid or setreuid, when the result is EAGAIN, which does means after
all, can not do your requested
operation now, please try again.
** Also affects: glibc (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Samba crashes repeatedly to assert_uid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216358
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 268663] Re: files incoming through nautilus-share should be created with user ownership, instead of nobody
** Also affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- files incoming through nautilus-share should be created with user ownership, instead of nobody https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268663 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 337203] Re: /usr/sbin/winbindd: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/samba/idmap/lwopen.so: undefined symbol: wcache_tdc_fetch_list
This likewise howto is apparently for use with the Likewise Enterprise packages published by Likewise, not the Likewise Open published by Ubuntu. We don't even include the files they are talking about. Then you follow some advice from the forum on how to adapt it to the Ubuntu packages and discover that those instructions don't work... That's not a bug in Ubuntu. That's a bug in that advice on how to adapt documentation that was never supposed to apply to us. ** Changed in: likewise-open (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- /usr/sbin/winbindd: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/samba/idmap/lwopen.so: undefined symbol: wcache_tdc_fetch_list https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337203 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to likewise-open in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 345957] Re: iscsid is looking for targets prior to network being available
** Attachment added: screen shot http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24152989/photo.jpg -- iscsid is looking for targets prior to network being available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345957 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to open-iscsi in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 345957] [NEW] iscsid is looking for targets prior to network being available
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: open-iscsi Description:Ubuntu jaunty (development branch) Release:9.04 open-iscsi: Installed: 2.0.870.1-0ubuntu2 Candidate: 2.0.870.1-0ubuntu2 Version table: *** 2.0.870.1-0ubuntu2 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status I am trying to get a iscsi target to mount at boot time by setting node.startup = automatic and adding the _netdev option to fstab. However, it appears that the open-scsi initd script is trying to find devices prior to network being available (line 90 in /etc/init.d/open- iscsi). I have attached a screen shot of the system startup. ** Affects: open-iscsi (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- iscsid is looking for targets prior to network being available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345957 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to open-iscsi in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 314623] Re: likewise-open: allows lockout while disconnected
I can't reproduce that. With the DC shut down I've ssh-ed in and typed 15 wrong passwords... but could still connect using cached credentials on the 16th attempt. Could you please explain what I could do to reproduce the issue ? ** Changed in: likewise-open (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- likewise-open: allows lockout while disconnected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314623 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to likewise-open in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 277492] Re: lwinet crashes when joining a windows domain with likewise
** Changed in: likewise-open (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- lwinet crashes when joining a windows domain with likewise https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277492 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to likewise-open in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 268663] Re: files incoming through nautilus-share should be created with user ownership, instead of nobody
nautilus-share adds user shares by running a command net usershare add . Currently, there is no real way to add a user share that has the inherit owner = yes option set. Hence, I'm marking samba as affected as well. -- files incoming through nautilus-share should be created with user ownership, instead of nobody https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268663 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 268663] Re: files incoming through nautilus-share should be created with user ownership, instead of nobody
Perhaps it would be a good idea to make the default smb.conf contain that flag within [global]. -- files incoming through nautilus-share should be created with user ownership, instead of nobody https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268663 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 287420] Re: likewise winbindd dumps core on startup
I can't reproduce that error... Did you update to 4.0.5-0ubuntu3.1 in hardy-updates and still get the same error ? If you upgraded to intrepid, do you still have the error ? Is there anything in the logs, anything produced apart from that core dump ? Could you enable https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Apport and regenerate the crash info ? Thanks, ** Changed in: likewise-open (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- likewise winbindd dumps core on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/287420 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to likewise-open in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 327703] Re: DHCP Request Cycle can get caught in infinite loop
Thanks Simon ! I guess we'll wait for the 2.48 release, then :) ** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged -- DHCP Request Cycle can get caught in infinite loop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327703 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 216358] Re: Samba crashes repeatedly to assert_uid
Sigh. It is even a bit more complex than that: In Unix-like systems, user-level activities are implemented by running processes. Most Unix systems support a ``thread'' as a separate concept; threads share memory inside a process, and the system scheduler actually schedules threads. Linux does this differently (and in my opinion uses a better approach): there is no essential difference between a thread and a process. Instead, in Linux, when a process creates another process it can choose what resources are shared (e.g., memory can be shared). The Linux kernel then performs optimizations to get thread-level speeds; see clone(2) for more information. It's worth noting that the Linux kernel developers tend to use the word ``task'', not ``thread'' or ``process'', but the external documentation tends to use the word process (so I'll use the term ``process'' here). When programming a multi-threaded application, it's usually better to use one of the standard thread libraries that hide these differences. Taken from: http://linux.com/base/ldp/howto/Secure-Programs-HOWTO/processes.html -- Samba crashes repeatedly to assert_uid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216358 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 345957] Re: iscsid is looking for targets prior to network being available
I should add that I tried changing /etc/rcS.d/S25open-iscsi to S41open- scsi (just after networking) and while I didn't get the [failed] message the target still didn't automatically mount. -- iscsid is looking for targets prior to network being available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345957 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to open-iscsi in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 345957] Re: iscsid is looking for targets prior to network being available
I can confirm the same for Hardy, this works for me: mv /etc/rcS.d/S25open-iscsi /etc/rcS.d/S50open-iscsi -- iscsid is looking for targets prior to network being available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345957 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to open-iscsi in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 249783] [NEW] Wrong message when sharing a root-owned folder
You have been subscribed to a public bug: Binary package hint: nautilus-share Ubuntu 8.04.1 nautilus-share 0.7.2-0ubuntu5 When a user with admin/sharing privileges attempts to share a root-owned folder (eg /shared) he gets the message: net usershare add: cannot share path/shared as we are restricted to only sharing directories we own The message suggests we ask admin to add usershare owner only = False to smb.conf. Throwing security away just to share 1 folder on 1 occasion? - Not a good idea. What it should do is put up a sudo-password box and share the folder. Failing that, the message should suggest gksudo nautilus to run nautilus as root to share the folder. ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed -- Wrong message when sharing a root-owned folder https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249783 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 249783] Re: Wrong message when sharing a root-owned folder
The message comes from /usr/bin/net, which belongs to samba. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: nautilus-share = samba -- Wrong message when sharing a root-owned folder https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249783 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 251433] Re: dpkg-reconfigure postfix partly broken
I can confirm the same issue. In my case it was a fresh install of postfix. Worked the first time, but I used Synaptic to completely remove it including the conf files. I then reinstalled with Synaptic and it would not let me get through the postinst. The error was related to the recipient delimiter, it would not accept any answer I gave it and I had to abandon the install; it seemed to have gotten the text OK from the button as opposed to the text typed in the input area. I then tried from the command line using sudo apt-get install postfix. again it hung on the same question, and would not accept any answer. When I hit cancel in the curses GUI it crashed the terminal window. I was able to install the package by selecting the configuration deferral offered as the first choice on the install. dpkg-reconfigure postfix had the same issues after I got the package installed. ' I was able to configure it mysellf by editing the conf files. I just now tried a dpkg-reconfigure and it works fine... I guess that's why its marked can't reproduce :o( -- dpkg-reconfigure postfix partly broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251433 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 345957] Re: iscsid is looking for targets prior to network being available
@Ryan: Are you able to login and mount the target manually? The way iscsi is handled has changed in jaunty. They're considered as normal block device, thus _netdev is not honored by the boot process. ** Changed in: open-iscsi (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- iscsid is looking for targets prior to network being available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345957 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to open-iscsi in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 345957] Re: iscsid is looking for targets prior to network being available
Yes, I can mount the target right away once I login. -- iscsid is looking for targets prior to network being available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345957 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to open-iscsi in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 345957] Re: iscsid is looking for targets prior to network being available
Setting it to S50open-iscsi didn't solve the issue for me. -- iscsid is looking for targets prior to network being available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345957 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to open-iscsi in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 338431] [NEW] package akonadi-server 1.1.1-0ubuntu2~intrepid2 failed to install/upgrade: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
You have been subscribed to a public bug: Simple upgrade (update-manager -d) from Hardy to Intrepid on an un- remarkable box. Not sure what else to add. ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: akonadi-server 1.1.1-0ubuntu2~intrepid2 SourcePackage: akonadi Title: package akonadi-server 1.1.1-0ubuntu2~intrepid2 failed to install/upgrade: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Uname: Linux 2.6.24-23-generic i686 ** Affects: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package -- package akonadi-server 1.1.1-0ubuntu2~intrepid2 failed to install/upgrade: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/338431 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.0 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 338431] Re: package akonadi-server 1.1.1-0ubuntu2~intrepid2 failed to install/upgrade: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
It looks like this was caused by MySQL failing to upgrade: Selecting previously deselected package mysql-server-5.0. (Reading database ... 345024 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking mysql-server-5.0 (from .../mysql-server-5.0_5.0.67-0ubuntu6_i386.deb) ... /usr/sbin/nscd: relocation error: /usr/sbin/nscd: symbol __nss_services_lookup, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference /usr/sbin/nscd: relocation error: /usr/sbin/nscd: symbol __nss_services_lookup, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference /usr/sbin/nscd: relocation error: /usr/sbin/nscd: symbol __nss_services_lookup, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference /usr/sbin/nscd: relocation error: /usr/sbin/nscd: symbol __nss_services_lookup, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference /usr/sbin/nscd: relocation error: /usr/sbin/nscd: symbol __nss_services_lookup, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference adduser: The group `mysql' does not exist. dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/mysql-server-5.0_5.0.67-0ubuntu6_i386.deb (--unpack): subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 ** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: akonadi = mysql-dfsg-5.0 -- package akonadi-server 1.1.1-0ubuntu2~intrepid2 failed to install/upgrade: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338431 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.0 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 33378] Re: Sftp can't copy directories
Confirming this is still an issue on Intrepid with openssh-client 1:5.1p1-3ubuntu1. sshfs has its own issues. -- Sftp can't copy directories https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33378 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
