[Bug 343898] [NEW] dhclient-script apparmor issues

2009-05-27 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
You have been subscribed to a public bug:

Please notice the dhclient-script. I tried as root and sudo, also
attempted to change the permission to 777, there was no change.

r...@abonilla-a150:/home/abonilla# dhclient eth0
There is already a pid file /var/run/dhclient.pid with pid 5707
killed old client process, removed PID file
Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Client V3.1.1
Copyright 2004-2008 Internet Systems Consortium.
All rights reserved.
For info, please visit http://www.isc.org/sw/dhcp/

wmaster0: unknown hardware address type 801
execve (/sbin/dhclient-script, ...): Permission denied
wmaster0: unknown hardware address type 801
Listening on LPF/eth0/00:1e:68:c0:9b:59
Sending on   LPF/eth0/00:1e:68:c0:9b:59
Sending on   Socket/fallback
DHCPREQUEST of 10.0.0.2 on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67
DHCPACK of 10.0.0.2 from 10.0.0.138
execve (/sbin/dhclient-script, ...): Permission denied
bound to 10.0.0.2 -- renewal in 39730 seconds.

[  176.233766] ath5k phy0: gain calibration timeout (2412MHz)
[  176.233785] ath5k phy0: ath5k_chan_set: unable to reset channel (2412 Mhz)
[  176.233793] wlan0: failed to restore operational channel after scan
[  176.458639] type=1503 audit(1237231722.264:15): operation=inode_permission 
requested_mask=w:: denied_mask=w:: fsuid=0 
name=/var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket pid=5699 
profile=/usr/lib/NetworkManager/nm-dhcp-client.action
[  177.205156] type=1503 audit(1237231723.012:16): operation=inode_permission 
requested_mask=w:: denied_mask=w:: fsuid=0 
name=/var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket pid=5700 
profile=/usr/lib/NetworkManager/nm-dhcp-client.action
[  178.841047] ath5k phy0: gain calibration timeout (2412MHz)
[  178.841067] ath5k phy0: can't reset hardware (-11)
[  178.841073] wlan0: Failed to config new SSID to the low-level driver
[  179.471742] ath5k phy0: gain calibration timeout (2412MHz)
[  179.471760] ath5k phy0: can't reset hardware (-11)
[  179.471767] wlan0: Failed to config new BSSID to the low-level driver
[  200.120268] type=1503 audit(1237231745.928:17): operation=inode_permission 
requested_mask=x:: denied_mask=x:: fsuid=0 name=/lib/ld-2.9.so pid=5705 
profile=/sbin/dhclient-script
[  202.196170] type=1503 audit(1237231748.000:18): operation=inode_permission 
requested_mask=x:: denied_mask=x:: fsuid=0 name=/lib/ld-2.9.so pid=5706 
profile=/sbin/dhclient-script
[  226.514684] type=1503 audit(1237231772.320:19): operation=inode_permission 
requested_mask=x:: denied_mask=x:: fsuid=0 name=/lib/ld-2.9.so pid=5778 
profile=/sbin/dhclient-script
[  229.196303] type=1503 audit(1237231775.004:20): operation=inode_permission 
requested_mask=x:: denied_mask=x:: fsuid=0 name=/lib/ld-2.9.so pid=5779 
profile=/sbin/dhclient-script

** Affects: dhcp3 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Confirmed

-- 
dhclient-script apparmor issues
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/343898
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server 
Team, which is subscribed to dhcp3 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 343898] Re: dhclient-script apparmor issues

2009-05-27 Thread Jamie Strandboge
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. To help fix the bug, please follow the instructions found
in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingApparmor. This will greatly help us
in tracking down your problem.

** Package changed: ubuntu = dhcp3 (Ubuntu)

** Changed in: dhcp3 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Incomplete

** Changed in: dhcp3 (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand)

-- 
dhclient-script apparmor issues
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/343898
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dhcp3 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 271922] Re: Default ACL not applied on files created through CIFS filesystem (mount.cifs)

2009-05-27 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: samba
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

-- 
Default ACL not applied on files created through CIFS filesystem (mount.cifs)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271922
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 380942] [NEW] snmptrapd v5.4.1 seems to have a memory leak much like snmpd in the previous release

2009-05-27 Thread Luke J Militello
Public bug reported:

I've ran some tests and snmptrapd in version 5.4.1 seems to be consuming
system memory much like how snmpd had a memory leak in the previous
release.  I have been cron'ing this script every 15 minutes to justify
my findings.  I do a lot of trap catching so I'm not sure if that has
any significance.  I am running Ubuntu 8.04.2 (hardy) with kernel
2.6.24-24-sparc64-smp and I have 4GB of RAM.

#!/bin/bash
SHELL=/bin/bash
PATH=/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin
memoryUsage=`ps aux | grep /usr/sbin/snmptrapd -Lsd -p /var/run/snmptrapd.pid 
| grep -v grep | awk -F   '{print $4}'`
dateTime=`date`
echo SNMPTRAPD [$dateTime]: $memoryUsage% system memory used.  
/etc/snmp/snmptrapd.debug.dat
#eof

And the results are...

SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 13 00:00:01 EDT 2009]: 0.4% system memory used.
SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 13 00:15:01 EDT 2009]: 0.7% system memory used.
SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 13 00:30:01 EDT 2009]: 0.8% system memory used.
SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 13 00:45:01 EDT 2009]: 0.8% system memory used.
SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 13 01:00:01 EDT 2009]: 0.9% system memory used.
SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 13 01:15:02 EDT 2009]: 0.9% system memory used.
SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 13 01:30:01 EDT 2009]: 1.5% system memory used.
SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 13 01:45:01 EDT 2009]: 1.7% system memory used.
SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 13 02:00:01 EDT 2009]: 1.7% system memory used.
SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 13 02:15:01 EDT 2009]: 1.8% system memory used.
[...]
SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 27 06:45:02 EDT 2009]: 69.4% system memory used.
SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 27 07:00:01 EDT 2009]: 69.4% system memory used.
SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 27 07:15:01 EDT 2009]: 69.5% system memory used.
SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 27 07:30:01 EDT 2009]: 69.4% system memory used.
SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 27 07:45:01 EDT 2009]: 69.5% system memory used.
SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 27 08:00:01 EDT 2009]: 69.4% system memory used.
SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 27 08:15:01 EDT 2009]: 69.4% system memory used.
SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 27 08:30:01 EDT 2009]: 69.3% system memory used.
SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 27 08:45:01 EDT 2009]: 69.3% system memory used.
SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 27 09:00:01 EDT 2009]: 69.3% system memory used.

Complete output file is attached.

** Affects: net-snmp (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
snmptrapd v5.4.1 seems to have a memory leak much like snmpd in the previous 
release
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/380942
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to net-snmp in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 380942] Re: snmptrapd v5.4.1 seems to have a memory leak much like snmpd in the previous release

2009-05-27 Thread Luke J Militello

** Attachment added: Complete debug output from my script.
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27203817/snmptrapd.debug.dat

-- 
snmptrapd v5.4.1 seems to have a memory leak much like snmpd in the previous 
release
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/380942
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to net-snmp in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 380962] [NEW] init script doesn't handle rndc error properly

2009-05-27 Thread David
Public bug reported:

1) Ubuntu 9.04

2) 1:9.5.1.dfsg.P2-1

3) I have disabled the remote admin capability on my bind9 server using
controls {};

I expected that I would still be able to both stop and to restart the
bind9 server using the /etc/init.d/bind9 script.  Furthermore I expected
that if the init script was unable to do either of these things it would
tell me that it had failed.

4) When I executed /etc/init.d/bind9 stop the following happened:

 * Stopping domain name service... bind9
rndc: connect failed: 127.0.0.1#953: connection refused
 [ OK ]

As you can see the init script printed [ OK ], which I interpreted to
mean that it had successfully stopped bind9.  Despite printing [ OK ]
the bind9 server hadn't actually been stopped: `ps aux|grep named`
confirmed this.

Ideally I would prefer if you fixed this bug by resorting to an
alternative method of killing bind9, e.g. `kill $PID` if the rndc
program fails.  If you don't want to do that, then could you at least
fix the init script so that it doesn't mistakenly print [ OK ].


(As an aside I discovered this bug when I executed /etc/init.d/bind9 restart 
and the following happened:

 * Stopping domain name service... bind9
rndc: connect failed: 127.0.0.1#953: connection refused
 [ OK ]
 * Starting domain name service... bind9[ OK ] 

This led me to believe that my configuration change to bind (enabling
DNSSEC) had succeeded (because I saw the two OKs), and therefore I
thought that my DNS lookups were now being protected by DNSSEC DLV
validation, when they in fact weren't.  I therefore consider this issue
to be on the borderline of being a security vulnerability, because it
led me to be believe that I had enabled a security feature when I had in
fact not done so.)

** Affects: bind9 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
init script doesn't handle rndc error properly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/380962
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 42947] Re: postfix: fatal: /etc/postfix/postfix-script: No such file or directory

2009-05-27 Thread Mario Zigliotto
Just ran into this on jaunty.

Fixed it with:
sudo apt-get remove postfix
sudo dpkg --purge postfix
sudo apt-get -V install postfix

no reboot needed

-- 
postfix: fatal: /etc/postfix/postfix-script: No such file or directory
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/42947
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 328874] Re: getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller

2009-05-27 Thread Adrien Cunin
What can be done in such a situation? Isn't the SRU Verification team
supposed to test the packages?

-- 
getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328874
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 380938] [NEW] _netdev not working; other mount.cifs problems

2009-05-27 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
You have been subscribed to a public bug:

I'm running the Jaunty kde3.5 remix (Ubuntu 9.04).  I have several
related problems with automount of a cifs share, shown by the following
transcript:

p...@lepiota:~$ mount /mediavault
mount error: permission denied or not superuser and mount.cifs not installed 
SUID
p...@lepiota:~$ cat /etc/fstab | grep mediavault
//hpmediavault/FileShare /mediavault cifs 
users,auto,rw,nodev,noexec,_netdev,guest 0 0
p...@lepiota:~$ ls -l $(which mount.cifs)
-rwsr-sr-x 1 root root 30704 2009-03-27 12:20 /sbin/mount.cifs

1. The /mediavault share is not mounted on boot, even though _netdev is
supposed to solve the problem of delayed mounting not taking place.

2. Despite the presence of users in the /etc/fstab entry, an ordinary
user cannot mount this share.  This happens even though mount.cifs is
installed SUID.

I also note that the same /etc/fstab entry works properly in OpenSuSE
11.1.

** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
_netdev not working; other mount.cifs problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/380938
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server 
Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 380938] Re: _netdev not working; other mount.cifs problems

2009-05-27 Thread Kurt Wall
** Package changed: ubuntu = samba (Ubuntu)

-- 
_netdev not working; other mount.cifs problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/380938
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 317564] Re: Upgrade to Subversion 1.6.x for Karmic

2009-05-27 Thread Andrew Snare
** Summary changed:

- Upgrade to Subversion 1.6.x for Jaunty 9.04
+ Upgrade to Subversion 1.6.x for Karmic

** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: subversion
  
  Subversion 1.5.5 is a minor bug fix release. It is already in Debian
  experimental - can it please be included in Jaunty?
  
  http://packages.debian.org/experimental/subversion
  
  http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/tags/1.5.5/CHANGES
  
  Thanks!
  
  Bug description is outdated, now the current Version is 1.6.2 with a new
  repo and wc format an much better performance and lots of bugfixes
  (grizzly)! Please provide a way to at least _choose_ what subversion to
  install (such as the old apache 1.3 vs. 2.x series decision was possible
  a long time in most distros and may be still)
+ 
+ (Bug description originally requested inclusion in Jaunty, which has
+ shipped.)

-- 
Upgrade to Subversion 1.6.x for Karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317564
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs