[Bug 343898] [NEW] dhclient-script apparmor issues
You have been subscribed to a public bug: Please notice the dhclient-script. I tried as root and sudo, also attempted to change the permission to 777, there was no change. r...@abonilla-a150:/home/abonilla# dhclient eth0 There is already a pid file /var/run/dhclient.pid with pid 5707 killed old client process, removed PID file Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Client V3.1.1 Copyright 2004-2008 Internet Systems Consortium. All rights reserved. For info, please visit http://www.isc.org/sw/dhcp/ wmaster0: unknown hardware address type 801 execve (/sbin/dhclient-script, ...): Permission denied wmaster0: unknown hardware address type 801 Listening on LPF/eth0/00:1e:68:c0:9b:59 Sending on LPF/eth0/00:1e:68:c0:9b:59 Sending on Socket/fallback DHCPREQUEST of 10.0.0.2 on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 DHCPACK of 10.0.0.2 from 10.0.0.138 execve (/sbin/dhclient-script, ...): Permission denied bound to 10.0.0.2 -- renewal in 39730 seconds. [ 176.233766] ath5k phy0: gain calibration timeout (2412MHz) [ 176.233785] ath5k phy0: ath5k_chan_set: unable to reset channel (2412 Mhz) [ 176.233793] wlan0: failed to restore operational channel after scan [ 176.458639] type=1503 audit(1237231722.264:15): operation=inode_permission requested_mask=w:: denied_mask=w:: fsuid=0 name=/var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket pid=5699 profile=/usr/lib/NetworkManager/nm-dhcp-client.action [ 177.205156] type=1503 audit(1237231723.012:16): operation=inode_permission requested_mask=w:: denied_mask=w:: fsuid=0 name=/var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket pid=5700 profile=/usr/lib/NetworkManager/nm-dhcp-client.action [ 178.841047] ath5k phy0: gain calibration timeout (2412MHz) [ 178.841067] ath5k phy0: can't reset hardware (-11) [ 178.841073] wlan0: Failed to config new SSID to the low-level driver [ 179.471742] ath5k phy0: gain calibration timeout (2412MHz) [ 179.471760] ath5k phy0: can't reset hardware (-11) [ 179.471767] wlan0: Failed to config new BSSID to the low-level driver [ 200.120268] type=1503 audit(1237231745.928:17): operation=inode_permission requested_mask=x:: denied_mask=x:: fsuid=0 name=/lib/ld-2.9.so pid=5705 profile=/sbin/dhclient-script [ 202.196170] type=1503 audit(1237231748.000:18): operation=inode_permission requested_mask=x:: denied_mask=x:: fsuid=0 name=/lib/ld-2.9.so pid=5706 profile=/sbin/dhclient-script [ 226.514684] type=1503 audit(1237231772.320:19): operation=inode_permission requested_mask=x:: denied_mask=x:: fsuid=0 name=/lib/ld-2.9.so pid=5778 profile=/sbin/dhclient-script [ 229.196303] type=1503 audit(1237231775.004:20): operation=inode_permission requested_mask=x:: denied_mask=x:: fsuid=0 name=/lib/ld-2.9.so pid=5779 profile=/sbin/dhclient-script ** Affects: dhcp3 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed -- dhclient-script apparmor issues https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/343898 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dhcp3 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 343898] Re: dhclient-script apparmor issues
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. To help fix the bug, please follow the instructions found in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingApparmor. This will greatly help us in tracking down your problem. ** Package changed: ubuntu = dhcp3 (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: dhcp3 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete ** Changed in: dhcp3 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand) -- dhclient-script apparmor issues https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/343898 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dhcp3 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 271922] Re: Default ACL not applied on files created through CIFS filesystem (mount.cifs)
** Changed in: samba Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- Default ACL not applied on files created through CIFS filesystem (mount.cifs) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271922 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 380942] [NEW] snmptrapd v5.4.1 seems to have a memory leak much like snmpd in the previous release
Public bug reported: I've ran some tests and snmptrapd in version 5.4.1 seems to be consuming system memory much like how snmpd had a memory leak in the previous release. I have been cron'ing this script every 15 minutes to justify my findings. I do a lot of trap catching so I'm not sure if that has any significance. I am running Ubuntu 8.04.2 (hardy) with kernel 2.6.24-24-sparc64-smp and I have 4GB of RAM. #!/bin/bash SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin memoryUsage=`ps aux | grep /usr/sbin/snmptrapd -Lsd -p /var/run/snmptrapd.pid | grep -v grep | awk -F '{print $4}'` dateTime=`date` echo SNMPTRAPD [$dateTime]: $memoryUsage% system memory used. /etc/snmp/snmptrapd.debug.dat #eof And the results are... SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 13 00:00:01 EDT 2009]: 0.4% system memory used. SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 13 00:15:01 EDT 2009]: 0.7% system memory used. SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 13 00:30:01 EDT 2009]: 0.8% system memory used. SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 13 00:45:01 EDT 2009]: 0.8% system memory used. SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 13 01:00:01 EDT 2009]: 0.9% system memory used. SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 13 01:15:02 EDT 2009]: 0.9% system memory used. SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 13 01:30:01 EDT 2009]: 1.5% system memory used. SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 13 01:45:01 EDT 2009]: 1.7% system memory used. SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 13 02:00:01 EDT 2009]: 1.7% system memory used. SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 13 02:15:01 EDT 2009]: 1.8% system memory used. [...] SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 27 06:45:02 EDT 2009]: 69.4% system memory used. SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 27 07:00:01 EDT 2009]: 69.4% system memory used. SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 27 07:15:01 EDT 2009]: 69.5% system memory used. SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 27 07:30:01 EDT 2009]: 69.4% system memory used. SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 27 07:45:01 EDT 2009]: 69.5% system memory used. SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 27 08:00:01 EDT 2009]: 69.4% system memory used. SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 27 08:15:01 EDT 2009]: 69.4% system memory used. SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 27 08:30:01 EDT 2009]: 69.3% system memory used. SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 27 08:45:01 EDT 2009]: 69.3% system memory used. SNMPTRAPD [Wed May 27 09:00:01 EDT 2009]: 69.3% system memory used. Complete output file is attached. ** Affects: net-snmp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- snmptrapd v5.4.1 seems to have a memory leak much like snmpd in the previous release https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/380942 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to net-snmp in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 380942] Re: snmptrapd v5.4.1 seems to have a memory leak much like snmpd in the previous release
** Attachment added: Complete debug output from my script. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27203817/snmptrapd.debug.dat -- snmptrapd v5.4.1 seems to have a memory leak much like snmpd in the previous release https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/380942 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to net-snmp in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 380962] [NEW] init script doesn't handle rndc error properly
Public bug reported: 1) Ubuntu 9.04 2) 1:9.5.1.dfsg.P2-1 3) I have disabled the remote admin capability on my bind9 server using controls {}; I expected that I would still be able to both stop and to restart the bind9 server using the /etc/init.d/bind9 script. Furthermore I expected that if the init script was unable to do either of these things it would tell me that it had failed. 4) When I executed /etc/init.d/bind9 stop the following happened: * Stopping domain name service... bind9 rndc: connect failed: 127.0.0.1#953: connection refused [ OK ] As you can see the init script printed [ OK ], which I interpreted to mean that it had successfully stopped bind9. Despite printing [ OK ] the bind9 server hadn't actually been stopped: `ps aux|grep named` confirmed this. Ideally I would prefer if you fixed this bug by resorting to an alternative method of killing bind9, e.g. `kill $PID` if the rndc program fails. If you don't want to do that, then could you at least fix the init script so that it doesn't mistakenly print [ OK ]. (As an aside I discovered this bug when I executed /etc/init.d/bind9 restart and the following happened: * Stopping domain name service... bind9 rndc: connect failed: 127.0.0.1#953: connection refused [ OK ] * Starting domain name service... bind9[ OK ] This led me to believe that my configuration change to bind (enabling DNSSEC) had succeeded (because I saw the two OKs), and therefore I thought that my DNS lookups were now being protected by DNSSEC DLV validation, when they in fact weren't. I therefore consider this issue to be on the borderline of being a security vulnerability, because it led me to be believe that I had enabled a security feature when I had in fact not done so.) ** Affects: bind9 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- init script doesn't handle rndc error properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/380962 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 42947] Re: postfix: fatal: /etc/postfix/postfix-script: No such file or directory
Just ran into this on jaunty. Fixed it with: sudo apt-get remove postfix sudo dpkg --purge postfix sudo apt-get -V install postfix no reboot needed -- postfix: fatal: /etc/postfix/postfix-script: No such file or directory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/42947 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 328874] Re: getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller
What can be done in such a situation? Isn't the SRU Verification team supposed to test the packages? -- getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328874 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 380938] [NEW] _netdev not working; other mount.cifs problems
You have been subscribed to a public bug: I'm running the Jaunty kde3.5 remix (Ubuntu 9.04). I have several related problems with automount of a cifs share, shown by the following transcript: p...@lepiota:~$ mount /mediavault mount error: permission denied or not superuser and mount.cifs not installed SUID p...@lepiota:~$ cat /etc/fstab | grep mediavault //hpmediavault/FileShare /mediavault cifs users,auto,rw,nodev,noexec,_netdev,guest 0 0 p...@lepiota:~$ ls -l $(which mount.cifs) -rwsr-sr-x 1 root root 30704 2009-03-27 12:20 /sbin/mount.cifs 1. The /mediavault share is not mounted on boot, even though _netdev is supposed to solve the problem of delayed mounting not taking place. 2. Despite the presence of users in the /etc/fstab entry, an ordinary user cannot mount this share. This happens even though mount.cifs is installed SUID. I also note that the same /etc/fstab entry works properly in OpenSuSE 11.1. ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- _netdev not working; other mount.cifs problems https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/380938 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 380938] Re: _netdev not working; other mount.cifs problems
** Package changed: ubuntu = samba (Ubuntu) -- _netdev not working; other mount.cifs problems https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/380938 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 317564] Re: Upgrade to Subversion 1.6.x for Karmic
** Summary changed: - Upgrade to Subversion 1.6.x for Jaunty 9.04 + Upgrade to Subversion 1.6.x for Karmic ** Description changed: Binary package hint: subversion Subversion 1.5.5 is a minor bug fix release. It is already in Debian experimental - can it please be included in Jaunty? http://packages.debian.org/experimental/subversion http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/tags/1.5.5/CHANGES Thanks! Bug description is outdated, now the current Version is 1.6.2 with a new repo and wc format an much better performance and lots of bugfixes (grizzly)! Please provide a way to at least _choose_ what subversion to install (such as the old apache 1.3 vs. 2.x series decision was possible a long time in most distros and may be still) + + (Bug description originally requested inclusion in Jaunty, which has + shipped.) -- Upgrade to Subversion 1.6.x for Karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317564 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs