[Bug 951087] Re: Samba non-functional on boot.

2014-04-26 Thread Adrien Beau
Note that instead of editing /etc/init/smbd.conf (which can mess up
package upgrades), you can create a file named /etc/init/smbd.override
and put the line there. Works fine for me, and solved the problem.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951087

Title:
  Samba non-functional on boot.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/951087/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 996968] Re: Samba needs to be stopped and restarted in order to work

2014-04-26 Thread Adrien Beau
This bug is still present in 14.04 LTS. Putting the following line in
/etc/init/smbd.override solves it for me:

start on (local-filesystems and net-device-up IFACE!=lo)

(Putting this line in /etc/init/smbd.conf also works of course.)

Why can't this line be included in the standard smbd.conf that ships
with Ubuntu? The only downside I can see is that on computers which only
have a loopback interface, Samba will not start. But why would someone
want to use Samba in such a configuration?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996968

Title:
  Samba needs to be stopped and restarted in order to work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/996968/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 996968] Re: Samba needs to be stopped and restarted in order to work

2014-04-26 Thread Adrien Beau
By the way, this bug seems to be a duplicate of
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/951087

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996968

Title:
  Samba needs to be stopped and restarted in order to work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/996968/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1277432] Re: Please update to samba 4.1.x from Debian/sid for trusty

2014-04-26 Thread Adrien Beau
2:4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2 is in LTS, this bug should be closed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1277432

Title:
  Please update to samba 4.1.x from Debian/sid for trusty

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1277432/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1242153] Re: package nova-common 1:2013.2~rc2-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2014-04-18 Thread Adrien Cunin
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1241803 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1241803

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1241803
   During Distribution Upgrade could not install 'nova-common'

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1242153

Title:
  package nova-common 1:2013.2~rc2-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
  ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned
  error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/1242153/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1247148] Re: rndc addzone isn't working. fix available

2014-04-18 Thread Adrien Cunin
Can you reproduce this on saucy or trusty?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1247148

Title:
  rndc addzone isn't working. fix available

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1247148/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1168030] Re: Apache2 with PHP FallbackResource doesn't work when Request-URI is / and encoding is gzip

2014-04-06 Thread Adrien Béraud
This bug breaks many websites.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1168030

Title:
  Apache2 with PHP FallbackResource doesn't work when Request-URI is /
  and encoding is gzip

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/1168030/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1005440] Re: "Could not load host key: /etc/ssh/ssh_host_ecdsa_key" when connecting

2013-01-26 Thread Adrien Beau
I was affected by this bug too, using Ubuntu Server 12.04.1 LTS, with
openssh-server 1:5.9p1-5ubuntu1. Using the following command line solved
the issue:

sudo ssh-keygen -f /etc/ssh/ssh_host_ecdsa_key -N '' -t ecdsa

I think it is important to note the following:

-- I did not install Ubuntu myself, it was automatically installed by my
dedicated hosting provider;

-- The install (or at least the SSH key generation) was performed from
an operating system booted and downloaded from the network (Debian 6.0.4
as far as I can tell);

-- The Ubuntu install has been slightly altered by my dedicated hosting
provider (nothing malicious, I checked that using debsums and diff;
mostly a couple additional proprietary hardware RAID administration
binaries in /sbin, a small monitoring framework in /usr/local, one
additional cron entry, and their very own Linux kernel).

So, I cannot say that the missing key is due to a bug in the openssh-
server install scripts (the openssh-server.postinst script looks fine to
me); I strongly suspect it is due to a bug in my hosting provider's
installation.

Michael Nagel, Kaizoku, did you install Ubuntu yourselves, or are you
using a version installed by a hosting provider?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1005440

Title:
  "Could not load host key: /etc/ssh/ssh_host_ecdsa_key" when connecting

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1005440/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 960350] Re: Cleanup Keystone package descriptions

2012-10-04 Thread Adrien Cunin
** Changed in: keystone (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Adrien Cunin (adri2000)

** Changed in: python-keystoneclient (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Adrien Cunin (adri2000)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/960350

Title:
  Cleanup Keystone package descriptions

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keystone/+bug/960350/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 960350] Re: Cleanup Keystone package descriptions

2012-10-04 Thread Adrien Cunin
** Also affects: python-keystoneclient (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: python-keystoneclient (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: python-keystoneclient (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Low

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/960350

Title:
  Cleanup Keystone package descriptions

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keystone/+bug/960350/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 978963] Re: add release note that OpenStack should be used on a protected network

2012-10-03 Thread Adrien Cunin
Why do we keep horizon and keystone tasks?

By the way, I think it's possible to mitigate this issue in Keystone
using Apache. See http://adam.younglogic.com/2012/04/keystone-httpd/ to
set it up and be able to use https:// for Keystone.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/978963

Title:
  add release note that OpenStack should be used on a protected network

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/978963/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1043292] Re: Hung agent processes

2012-10-02 Thread Adrien
Thanks James & Clint for your answers.

I would like to add some details:

Currently, as a temporary solution, we use crontab to kill the process
at 00h00 and start again at 00h01. With that, we are sure that the agent
works every days.

With my co-worker, we have updated a server (Ubuntu 12.04 LTS) which had
the stable version (2.7.11) with the version of quantal (2.7.18, we used
pin preferences for that), and we have the same problem.. Nothing wrong
in syslog

For example, saturday, the last execution of the puppet was at 07h00 AM,
and the next at 00h00 sunday (thanks to crontab)..

I hope this information can help you..!

Regards

Adrien

** Attachment added: "Screenshot of hung agent"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/puppet/+bug/1043292/+attachment/3366182/+files/puppet.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to puppet in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1043292

Title:
  Hung agent processes

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/puppet/+bug/1043292/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1043410] Re: nova-manage create flavor shouldn't require a flavorid

2012-08-29 Thread Adrien Cunin
(Sorry I filed this against ubuntu/nova instead of nova.)

** Package changed: nova (Ubuntu) => nova

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1043410

Title:
  nova-manage create flavor shouldn't require a flavorid

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1043410/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1043410] [NEW] nova-manage create flavor shouldn't require a flavorid

2012-08-29 Thread Adrien Cunin
Public bug reported:

It's possible to specify a flavorid using --flavor=... (which is a
different thing than the auto-incremented id in the DB) when creating a
flavor but I think it shouldn't be required. If nothing is specified it
could be automatically generated.

$ nova-manage flavor create --name=test --memory=512 --cpu=1 --root_gb=0 
--ephemeral_gb=0 
Possible wrong number of arguments supplied
Creates instance types / flavors
[...]
TypeError: create() takes at least 7 arguments (6 given)

Expected:
$ nova-manage flavor create --name=test --memory=512 --cpu=1 --root_gb=0 
--ephemeral_gb=0 
[...]
test created

** Affects: nova
 Importance: Undecided
 Assignee: Adrien Cunin (adri2000)
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1043410

Title:
  nova-manage create flavor shouldn't require a flavorid

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1043410/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1043292] [NEW] Hung agent processes

2012-08-29 Thread Adrien
Public bug reported:

Since 2.7.11, the puppet process has gotten stuck in some hosts.

You can read the issue on the bugreport below:

http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/13038

Is it possible to update the package to 2.7.12 or > in LTS?

Thx.

** Affects: puppet (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to puppet in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1043292

Title:
  Hung agent processes

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/puppet/+bug/1043292/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1013457] Re: twistd still autostarted for juju after juju is removed from system

2012-07-01 Thread Adrien Lamothe
Just delete the startup files /etc/init/juju--sample-file-
storage.conf and /etc/init/juju--sample-machine-agent.conf
when the user removes juju. That's all that needs to happen to fix this
bug.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to juju in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013457

Title:
  twistd still autostarted for juju after juju is removed from system

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1013457/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1013457] Re: twistd still autostarted for juju after juju is removed from system

2012-06-16 Thread Adrien Lamothe
Hey Clintie, do you think you can spell my name correctly?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to juju in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013457

Title:
  twistd still autostarted for juju after juju is removed from system

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1013457/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1013457] Re: twistd still autostarted for juju after juju is removed from system

2012-06-14 Thread Adrien Lamothe
** Attachment added: "juju_twistd.png"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013457/+attachment/3190170/+files/juju_twistd.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to juju in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013457

Title:
  twistd still autostarted for juju after juju is removed from system

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/juju/+bug/1013457/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1013457] [NEW] twistd still autostarted for juju after juju is removed from system

2012-06-14 Thread Adrien Lamothe
Public bug reported:

After removing Juju from my system ("apt-get remove --purge juju") I
notice a python twistd process for juju still runs all the time (it is
started at bootup.) The process is outputting data to the storage-
server.log. A screen shot is attached showing the process.

** Affects: juju (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: juju storage-server.log twistd

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to juju in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013457

Title:
  twistd still autostarted for juju after juju is removed from system

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/juju/+bug/1013457/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1003138] Re: python process hogged the cpu in 12.04

2012-06-14 Thread Adrien Lamothe
It appears the bug also output huge amounts of data to the machine-
agent.log file, ~ 93 GB, which completely ate up my free disk space.
This happened gradually over a period of time. I've attached a screen
shot showing this.

It is important to note that during the period where Juju was running
amok, I never once used it. It was merely installed on my computer.


** Attachment added: "machine-agent-log.png"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/juju/+bug/1003138/+attachment/3190147/+files/machine-agent-log.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to juju in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003138

Title:
  python process hogged the cpu in 12.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/juju/+bug/1003138/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1003138] Re: python process hogged the cpu in 12.04

2012-06-08 Thread Adrien Lamothe
Just happened again, have attached a screen shot of the 'top' output.
Also:

~$ cat /proc/1007/cmdline | tr '\0' '\n'
/usr/bin/python
-m
juju.agents.machine
--nodaemon
--logfile
/home/alamo/juju/alamo-sample/machine-agent.log
--session-file
/var/run/juju/alamo-sample-machine-agent.zksession


** Attachment added: "Screenshot from 2012-06-08 14:38:13.png"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/juju/+bug/1003138/+attachment/3181377/+files/Screenshot%20from%202012-06-08%2014%3A38%3A13.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to juju in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003138

Title:
  python process hogged the cpu in 12.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/juju/+bug/1003138/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 934064] Re: Installing openstack-dashboard on Precise removes Keystone package

2012-02-29 Thread Adrien Cunin
See #916773 for the explanation of why the conflict was added.
Essex 4 shouldn't cause any more problem, so the packaging can be fixed.

** Also affects: python-keystoneclient (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: python-keystoneclient (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

** Changed in: python-keystoneclient (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: python-keystoneclient (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Chuck Short (zulcss)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/934064

Title:
  Installing openstack-dashboard on Precise removes Keystone package

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/934064/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 942541] [NEW] Short descriptions mistakes

2012-02-28 Thread Adrien Cunin
Public bug reported:

nova-cert and nova-doc short descriptions should be fixed:
 * nova-cert: s/virtual machine scheduler/certificate management/
 * nova-doc: s/documetation/documentation/

** Affects: nova (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Low
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942541

Title:
  Short descriptions mistakes

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/942541/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 563805] Re: mount.cifs won't mount shares; set uid bit not set

2010-04-17 Thread Adrien Chauve
** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: samba
  
  In 9.10 this worked fine:
  
  dut...@vampire:~$ mount.cifs //dragon/dutchy ~/dragon/
  Password:
  
  In 10.04, i get:
  
  dut...@vampire:~$ mount.cifs //dragon/dutchy dragon/
- Password: 
+ Password:
  mount error(1): Operation not permitted
  Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g. man mount.cifs)
  
  Setting the set uid bit fixed the problem:
- dut...@vampire:~$ sudo chmod +s /sbin/umount.cifs
+ dut...@vampire:~$ sudo chmod +s /sbin/mount.cifs
  
  I am quite sure I didn't change this, so somewhere in the upgrade
  process 9.10 -> 10.04 something went wrong.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
  Package: smbfs 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-19.28-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1
  Uname: Linux 2.6.32-19-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
  Architecture: amd64
  CIFSMounts: Error: command ['mount', '|', 'grep', 'cifs'] failed with exit 
code 1: mount: only root can do that
  Date: Thu Apr 15 15:07:39 2010
  ProcEnviron:
-  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
-  SHELL=/bin/bash
+  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
  SambaClientRegression: Yes
  SourcePackage: samba

-- 
mount.cifs won't mount shares; set uid bit not set
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563805
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 328874] Re: getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller

2009-06-23 Thread Adrien Cunin
Sorry to be repeating myself, but isn't the SRU Verification team
supposed to do all these tests?

Also, given that the patch comes from and is approved by upstream, given
that it's really tiny, given that it's been in -proposed for more than 3
months with no negative feedback (nor positive, right), would it be
possible to assume it's safe to move it to -updates?

-- 
getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328874
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 328874] Re: getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller

2009-05-27 Thread Adrien Cunin
What can be done in such a situation? Isn't the SRU Verification team
supposed to test the packages?

-- 
getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328874
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 328874] Re: getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller

2009-04-20 Thread Adrien Cunin
Martin, I cannot test the packages in -proposed because I don't have
anymore access to the domain controllers where I encountered the bug,
but when I had such access, I built and tested my own packages including
exactly the same patch with a successful result, and I know the domain
controllers have been running using these packages without any problem
since then.

-- 
getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328874
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 328874] Re: getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller

2009-04-05 Thread Adrien Cunin
Could the SRU Verification team take a look at this bug please?

-- 
getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328874
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 328874] Re: getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller

2009-02-16 Thread Adrien Cunin
Needs to be uploaded by ubuntu-main-sponsors and ACKed by ubuntu-sru,
once the bug is fixed in jaunty.

** Attachment added: "hardy debdiff"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22706088/samba_3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.8.debdiff

-- 
getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328874
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 328874] Re: getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller

2009-02-16 Thread Adrien Cunin
Steve, can you merge the latest version from unstable into jaunty before
Thursday?

** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Jaunty)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Steve Langasek (vorlon)

** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Hardy)
   Status: Confirmed => In Progress

-- 
getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328874
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 328874] Re: getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller

2009-02-14 Thread Adrien Cunin
** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: samba
  
  I encountered this bug on a hardy domain controller using winbind to
  fetch user/group informations from another NT domain (the Samba domain
  trusts the NT domain). Calling getent group just crashes winbindd, as
  seen in the log attached.
  
  This is a bug known and fixed upstream [0] (in 3.2.6 and 3.3.0).
- Fixing jaunty is a matter of uploading the latest 3.2 version.
+ Fixing jaunty is a matter of uploading the latest 3.2 version or 3.3.
  Fixing hardy requires backporting the patch (I successfully tested it 
already). Actually the bug is not fixed in any maintenance release of 3.0, and 
I'm not sure it will ever be (as it seems to be EOL), but I got upstream to 
confirm the fix is appropriate for this branch as well [1] and commit it [2].
  If someone is interested, we could also fix intrepid. I don't know about 
other releases.
  
  [0] https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5906
  [1] http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2009-February/063155.html
  [2] 
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=commit;h=db4a435d235bedf48d668a0f4418dd46f38044ed

-- 
getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328874
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 328874] Re: getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller

2009-02-13 Thread Adrien Cunin
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium
   Status: New => Confirmed

** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Hardy)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Adrien Cunin (adri2000)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328874
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 328874] Re: getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller

2009-02-12 Thread Adrien Cunin

** Attachment added: "winbindd-crash.log"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22567931/winbindd-crash.log

** Bug watch added: Samba Bugzilla #5906
   https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5906

** Also affects: samba via
   https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5906
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328874
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 328874] [NEW] getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller

2009-02-12 Thread Adrien Cunin
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: samba

I encountered this bug on a hardy domain controller using winbind to
fetch user/group informations from another NT domain (the Samba domain
trusts the NT domain). Calling getent group just crashes winbindd, as
seen in the log attached.

This is a bug known and fixed upstream [0] (in 3.2.6 and 3.3.0).
Fixing jaunty is a matter of uploading the latest 3.2 version.
Fixing hardy requires backporting the patch (I successfully tested it already). 
Actually the bug is not fixed in any maintenance release of 3.0, and I'm not 
sure it will ever be (as it seems to be EOL), but I got upstream to confirm the 
fix is appropriate for this branch as well [1] and commit it [2].
If someone is interested, we could also fix intrepid. I don't know about other 
releases.

[0] https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5906
[1] http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2009-February/063155.html
[2] 
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=commit;h=db4a435d235bedf48d668a0f4418dd46f38044ed

** Affects: samba
 Importance: Unknown
 Status: Fix Released

** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328874
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 222804] Re: [SRU] fail2ban fails to start after reboot

2008-10-15 Thread Adrien Cunin
Chuck,
According to 
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+queue?queue_state=4&queue_text=fail2ban, 
your upload was rejected on 2008-09-03. Please sort it out and re-upload. If 
you cannot take care of that reasonably quickly (the sru process started more 
than 3 months ago!), please tell us so that someone else can do the work. 
Thanks.

-- 
[SRU] fail2ban fails to start after reboot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222804
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs