[Bug 1406729] Re: dig does not have a default trusted key
Considering that the 'bind9' package ships the root key (in /etc/bind/bind.keys), I see no reason why it should not also be shipped in the dnsutils package as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1406729 Title: dig does not have a default trusted key To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1406729/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1406729] [NEW] dig does not have a default trusted key
Public bug reported: dig, as supplied, will not validate a DNSSEC domain. The +sigchase option should cause validation to occur but it does not. As noted in http://bryars.eu/2010/08/validating-and-exploring-dnssec- with-dig/ if a file called 'trusted-key.key' is present then dig will use that. By default dig will look in /etc/trusted-key.key and then the current directory. By supplying the file /etc/trusted-key.key, dig's signature checking will work out of the box. Thanks, Anand ** Affects: bind9 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1406729 Title: dig does not have a default trusted key To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1406729/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1090593] Re: D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET changing January 3rd 2013
As noted in http://d.root-servers.org/renumber.html, the change will be done on the 3rd Jan and the old IP address will be retried 6 months later. Could we get proposed-update packages before the 3rd Jun (when the old IP will stop responding)? I'm presuming that the Ubuntu guys are waiting until the start of May so that 8.04 LTS does not need new packages. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1090593 Title: D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET changing January 3rd 2013 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1090593/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 825825] [NEW] have DNS based verification occur by default
Public bug reported: Hi, openssh can lookup a host's key in the DNS (via the SSHFP record) and use it compare hosts presented public key. VerifyHostKeyDNS yes I believe that is the connection is secured via DNSSEC that this option will allow for the host's key to be automagically accepted. However I have not verified that myself. However I have had this personally set to 'Yes' and for initial connection to hosts which are NOT secured via DNSSEC I am prompted to accept the key. If you want to be more cautious with the change then perhaps setting 'VerifyHostKeyDNS ask' would be better. Either way, I think that making this the default option will: - increase security for those who choose to deploy SSHFP - increased awareness of this ability The only downside is that a connection will make external calls to the DNS to determine if a SSHFP record exists. It would be great if this change could be made before 12.04 is released. ** Affects: openssh (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/825825 Title: have DNS based verification occur by default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/825825/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 825825] Re: have DNS based verification occur by default
Meant to say that /etc/ssh/config would be the place to put the default configuration. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/825825 Title: have DNS based verification occur by default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/825825/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 782614] Re: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier
** Patch added: 0004-dnssec-in-options.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/782614/+attachment/2257805/+files/0004-dnssec-in-options.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782614 Title: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/782614/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 782614] Re: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier
DNSSEC will place an additional burden on the network and, in particular, the infrastructure based DNS servers. The rationale to have the root key defined here but not used is that will use some of the existing DNS infrastructure (via use of RFC5011) and allow server operators to gauge load. I would recommend that Ubuntu 11.10 ships with DNSSEC available (i.e. root key but disabled) and Ubuntu 12.04 ships with DNSSEC enabled (i.e. root key and enabled by default), so that server operators are not overwhelmed. ** Patch added: 0005-Add-in-the-current-root-.-DNSSEC-key.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/782614/+attachment/2257836/+files/0005-Add-in-the-current-root-.-DNSSEC-key.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782614 Title: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/782614/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 782614] Re: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier
Note, I just checked Fedora 15 and the root key is setup similarly and is *enabled* by default as well. So you might just want to do so within Ubuntu as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782614 Title: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/782614/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 782614] Re: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier
** Patch added: 0001-Add-a-named.conf.keys-file-for-storing-various-keys.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/782614/+attachment/2256290/+files/0001-Add-a-named.conf.keys-file-for-storing-various-keys.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782614 Title: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/782614/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 782614] Re: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier
** Patch added: 0002-Install-the-named.conf.keys-file.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/782614/+attachment/2256307/+files/0002-Install-the-named.conf.keys-file.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782614 Title: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/782614/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 782614] Re: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier
** Patch added: 0003-Include-the-named.conf.keys-file.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/782614/+attachment/2256349/+files/0003-Include-the-named.conf.keys-file.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782614 Title: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/782614/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 605871] Re: [needs-packaging] rrdtool 1.4.4
libdbi is now clear in the later version of Ubuntu. Any progress on an updated rrdtool? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to rrdtool in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605871 Title: [needs-packaging] rrdtool 1.4.4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rrdtool/+bug/605871/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 782614] Re: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier
** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782614 Title: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 782614] Re: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier
All versions of BIND that Ubuntu has ever published could do with improvements in making DNSSEC easier. However, as noted in the linked instructions, the specific suggestions apply to Bind 9.7+ Which, according to http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=bind9 is Ubuntu 10.04 (Lucid) and later. Thanks, Anand -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782614 Title: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 782614] [NEW] make configuring DNSSEC validation easier
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bind9 As noted here: http://wiki.debian.org/DNSSEC#BIND9 The are some configuration changes required to enable DNSSEC validation. I think it would be nicer if things could be made easier. Create an empty file /etc/bind/named.conf.keys Include the file in /etc/bind/named.conf Include a commented out entry in /etc/bind/named.conf.options of: // dnssec-validation yes; within the options section. This would made the steps listed there even simpler. ** Affects: bind9 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782614 Title: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 700945] Re: backport of patch for error message undefined method `closed?' for Nil:NilClass required.
Hi guys, I am very happy to confirm that this worked great. First it was gave me an indication that the remote server was not responding (as per http://bitcube.co.uk/content/puppet-errors-explained) and then it correclt diagnosed a mismatched server identity. Thanks for getting this fix in. Regards, Anand On 16 April 2011 20:38, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Oliver thats great! We usually try to get some third party who did not develop the fix to verify the proposed packages before marking it as verification done. Anand, are you still affected by the original problem, and if so, would you be willing to try out the package from lucid-proposed? -- You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/700945 Title: backport of patch for error message undefined method `closed?' for Nil:NilClass required. Status in puppet: Fix Released Status in “puppet” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “puppet” source package in Lucid: Fix Committed Bug description: Binary package hint: puppet Hi, There are many versions of puppet, fortunately lucid (10.04) has a relatively new version (merely called legacy from puppetlabs). Unfortunately it has a number of bugs / issues, one of which I have recently encountered is an underlying bug in Ruby (and OpenSSL) on Lucid. However, the bug can be easily worked around, as noted two months after lucid's release. http://www.mailinglistarchive.com/html/puppet- us...@googlegroups.com/2010-06/msg00206.html Basically, upgrading to the latest available version of puppet in the 'legacy' series will resolve the issue. To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/puppet/+bug/700945/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to puppet in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/700945 Title: backport of patch for error message undefined method `closed?' for Nil:NilClass required. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 729780] [NEW] bind9 fails to create pid file.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bind9 1. root@ns3:~# lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS Release:10.04 2. ot@ns3:~# apt-cache policy bind9 bind9: Installed: 1:9.7.0.dfsg.P1-1ubuntu0.1 Candidate: 1:9.7.0.dfsg.P1-1ubuntu0.1 Version table: *** 1:9.7.0.dfsg.P1-1ubuntu0.1 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/main Packages 500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-security/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1:9.7.0.dfsg.P1-1 0 500 http://ubuntu.positive-internet.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 3. I expected bind to create a pid file. 4. bind9 did not create a pid file. Here are the default when installing from scratch, and 'apt-get install bind9'. root@ns3:~# ps aux | grep bind root 4138 0.0 0.2 6156 736 pts/0S+ 18:27 0:00 grep bind root@ns3:~# ls -l /var/run/ total 44 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 Mar 5 14:50 ConsoleKit -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4 Mar 4 06:36 collectdmon.pid -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5 Mar 4 06:37 console-kit-daemon.pid -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4 Mar 4 06:36 crond.pid -- 1 root root 0 Mar 4 06:36 crond.reboot drwxr-xr-x 2 messagebus messagebus 80 Mar 4 06:36 dbus drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 80 Mar 4 06:36 fail2ban -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3 Mar 4 06:36 memcached.pid -rw-r--r-- 1 root root187 Mar 5 14:50 motd drwxrwxr-x 2 root bind 40 Nov 30 20:35 named running bind9 results in: Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: starting BIND 9.7.0-P1 -u bind Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: built with '--prefix=/usr' '--mandir=/usr/share/man' '--infodir=/usr/share/info' '--sysconfdir=/etc/bind' '--localstatedir=/var' '--en able-threads' '--enable-largefile' '--with-libtool' '--enable-shared' '--enable-static' '--with-openssl=/usr' '--with-gssapi=/usr' '--with-gnu-ld' '--with-dlz-postgres =no' '--with-dlz-mysql=no' '--with-dlz-bdb=yes' '--with-dlz-filesystem=yes' '--with-dlz-ldap=yes' '--with-dlz-stub=yes' '--with-geoip=/usr' '--enable-ipv6' 'CFLAGS=-fn o-strict-aliasing -DDIG_SIGCHASE -O2' 'LDFLAGS=-Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions' 'CPPFLAGS=' Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: adjusted limit on open files from 1024 to 1048576 Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: found 1 CPU, using 1 worker thread Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: using up to 4096 sockets Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: loading configuration from '/etc/bind/named.conf' Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: reading built-in trusted keys from file '/etc/bind/bind.keys' Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: using default UDP/IPv4 port range: [1024, 65535] Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: using default UDP/IPv6 port range: [1024, 65535] Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: listening on IPv6 interfaces, port 53 Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: listening on IPv4 interface lo, 127.0.0.1#53 Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: listening on IPv4 interface eth0, 95.172.29.74#53 Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: Could not open '/var/run/named/named.pid'. Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: Please check file and directory permissions or reconfigure the filename. Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: could not open file '/var/run/named/named.pid': Permission denied Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: generating session key for dynamic DNS Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: Could not open '/var/run/named/session.key'. Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: Please check file and directory permissions or reconfigure the filename. Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: could not open file '/var/run/named/session.key': Permission denied Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: could not create /var/run/named/session.key Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: failed to generate session key for dynamic DNS: permission denied Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: automatic empty zone: 254.169.IN-ADDR.ARPA root@ns3:~# ps aux | grep bind bind 4154 0.1 5.1 119468 12864 ?Ssl 18:27 0:00 /usr/sbin/named -u bind root 4169 0.0 0.2 6156 740 pts/0S+ 18:28 0:00 grep bind OK - so it is running as the user bind. Let's chown the directory to that user: root@ns3:~# chown bind: /var/run/named/ root@ns3:~# ls -la /var/run/ total 48 drwxr-xr-x 11 root root440 Mar 5 14:50 . drwxr-xr-x 15 root root 4096 Mar 4 05:21 .. drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 Mar 5 14:50 ConsoleKit -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4 Mar 4 06:36 collectdmon.pid -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5 Mar 4 06:37 console-kit-daemon.pid -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4 Mar 4 06:36 crond.pid -- 1 root root 0 Mar 4 06:36 crond.reboot drwxr-xr-x 2 messagebus messagebus 80 Mar 4 06:36 dbus drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 80 Mar 4 06:36 fail2ban -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3 Mar 4 06:36 memcached.pid
[Bug 104525] Re: default ntp.conf should use pool.ntp.org servers
See if you can contact someone from the Canonical server team. Personally I'd also try to contact the ntp maintainer via IRC too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104525 Title: default ntp.conf should use pool.ntp.org servers -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 700945] [NEW] puppet 0.25.5 backport required
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: puppet Hi, There are many versions of puppet, fortunately lucid (10.04) has a relatively new version (merely called legacy from puppetlabs). Unfortunately it has a number of bugs / issues, one of which I have recently encountered is an underlying bug in Ruby (and OpenSSL) on Lucid. However, the bug can be easily worked around, as noted two months after lucid's release. http://www.mailinglistarchive.com/html/puppet- us...@googlegroups.com/2010-06/msg00206.html Basically, upgrading to the latest available version of puppet in the 'legacy' series will resolve the issue. ** Affects: puppet (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to puppet in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/700945 Title: puppet 0.25.5 backport required -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 512732] Re: package libvirt-bin 0.7.5-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
OK - it appears that /etc/passwd.lock and /etc/shadow.lock existed, for some reason, and was the cause of the problem. I removed those file and was able to complete installed. Closing. ** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- package libvirt-bin 0.7.5-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512732 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 512732] Re: package libvirt-bin 0.7.5-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Hi, Yes, it occurs all the time. Now occuring with 0.7.5-5ubuntu7, let me know if you would like to do any further investigation. Thanks, Anand ** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- package libvirt-bin 0.7.5-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512732 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 512732] [NEW] package libvirt-bin 0.7.5-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: 1) eve:[~]% lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu lucid (development branch) Release:10.04 2) eve:[~]% apt-cache policy libvirt-bin libvirt-bin: Installed: 0.7.5-5ubuntu3 Candidate: 0.7.5-5ubuntu3 Version table: *** 0.7.5-5ubuntu3 0 500 http://uk.archive.ubuntu.com lucid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 3) successfull installation 4) failed to install ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Jan 26 10:42:11 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Package: libvirt-bin 0.7.5-5ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-11.15-generic SourcePackage: libvirt Title: package libvirt-bin 0.7.5-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-11-generic i686 ** Affects: libvirt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 lucid -- package libvirt-bin 0.7.5-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512732 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 512732] Re: package libvirt-bin 0.7.5-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38399177/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38399178/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Df.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38399179/Df.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38399180/Dmesg.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38399181/DpkgTerminalLog.gz -- package libvirt-bin 0.7.5-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512732 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 477333] [NEW] cron job is overly noisy
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: sysstat 1) eve[~]% lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 9.10 Release:9.10 2) eve[~]% apt-cache policy sysstat sysstat: Installed: 9.0.3-2ubuntu1 Candidate: 9.0.3-2ubuntu1 Version table: *** 9.0.3-2ubuntu1 0 500 http://uk.archive.ubuntu.com karmic/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 3) Currently sysstat is not enabled (via /etc/default/sysstat) but an email is generated from the cron job every 10 minutes. 4) No noise from cron when executing the job e.g. Nov 7 09:05:01 eve CRON[9668]: (root) CMD (command -v debian-sa1 /dev/null debian-sa1 1 1) Nov 7 09:09:01 eve CRON[9673]: (root) CMD ( [ -x /usr/lib/php5/maxlifetime ] [ -d /var/lib/php5 ] find /var/lib/php5/ -type f -cmin +$(/usr/lib/php5/maxlifetime) -print0 | xargs -n 200 -r -0 rm) Nov 7 09:15:01 eve CRON[9687]: (root) CMD (command -v debian-sa1 /dev/null debian-sa1 1 1) Nov 7 09:17:01 eve CRON[9691]: (root) CMD ( cd / run-parts --report /etc/cron.hourly) Nov 7 09:25:01 eve CRON[9708]: (root) CMD (command -v debian-sa1 /dev/null debian-sa1 1 1) Nov 7 09:35:01 eve CRON[9718]: (root) CMD (command -v debian-sa1 /dev/null debian-sa1 1 1) ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Nov 7 11:08:52 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 Package: sysstat 9.0.3-2ubuntu1 ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=C PATH=(custom, user) LANG=C SHELL=/usr/bin/zsh ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic SourcePackage: sysstat Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic i686 ** Affects: sysstat (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- cron job is overly noisy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477333 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to sysstat in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 477333] Re: cron job is overly noisy
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35304279/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35304289/XsessionErrors.txt -- cron job is overly noisy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477333 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to sysstat in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 357569] Re: please set usershare path
The uncontrovorsial changes are the ones I already elaborated. Please let me know if you did not understand my English and I will try to explain things once again. Obviously the bug report asking for the directory to be created on the filesystem has not been filed. I will file it shortly, unless you have beaten me to it. But do you have anything else to add to this particular issue which might be relevant? Thanks, Anand On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Thierry Carrez thierry.car...@ubuntu.com wrote: What is this uncontroversial change ? If it's Please set in smb.conf: usershare path = /var/lib/samba/usershares, I fail to see what having it in the configuration file but not created on the filesystem would change to the error message you are observing. I tried net usershare info with the usershare path explicitely defined and got the exact same error as without it. Could you elaborate ? -- please set usershare path https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357569 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- please set usershare path https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357569 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 357569] Re: please set usershare path
I'd rather file a separate bug for each of those issues you mention - since this change should be uncontroversial, I can not see any reason to not do it. Whereas differing people might agree / disagree about whether to enable / disable usershares by default. Thanks, Anand On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Thierry Carrez thierry.car...@ubuntu.com wrote: What would setting usershare path = /var/lib/samba/usershares change exactly ? The issue here (if any) is that by default usershares are not enabled, the directory is not created and nautilus-share is a little noisy when trying to test their existence ? ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- please set usershare path https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357569 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- please set usershare path https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357569 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 357569] [NEW] please set usershare path
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba Hi, Whilst perusing my ~/.xsession-error file, I noticed nautilius-share complaining. It turns out it is trying to do 'net usershare info', which was failing. Please set in smb.conf: usershare path = /var/lib/samba/usershares This is okay, since the option 'usershares max' is by default 0 (i.e. none are allowed). It would also be a good idea to ship /var/lib/samba/usershares in the samba-common package, since that package is installed by default when ubuntu-desktop is selected, as is nautilus-share. Thanks, Anand ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Package: samba 2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=C SHELL=/usr/bin/zsh SourcePackage: samba Uname: Linux 2.6.28-11-generic i686 ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- please set usershare path https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357569 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 357569] Re: please set usershare path
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25008692/Dependencies.txt -- please set usershare path https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357569 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 201786] Re: ssh Agent admitted failure to sign using the key on big endian machines
Hi Sebastien, How we can help diagnose the problem? The issue description is wrong (since earlier commentators indicated that it also failed on amd64). I have an i386 and amd64 machine and am only expericing this issue on the amd64 one. Thanks, Anand -- ssh Agent admitted failure to sign using the key on big endian machines https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201786 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
