[Bug 1379567] Re: maas-proxy is an open proxy with no ACLs; it should add networks automatically
For the 1.9 backport of this fix, rather than introduce a schema migration (as done for 2.0), we'll simply allow all known subnets to use the proxy, with a note in the proxy config to disable unwanted subnets with iptables. ** Also affects: maas (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1379567 Title: maas-proxy is an open proxy with no ACLs; it should add networks automatically To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/1379567/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1379567] Re: maas-proxy is an open proxy with no ACLs; it should add networks automatically
** Branch linked: lp:~lamont/maas/create-maas-proxy.conf-packaging -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1379567 Title: maas-proxy is an open proxy with no ACLs; it should add networks automatically To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/1379567/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1379567] Re: maas-proxy is an open proxy with no ACLs; it should add networks automatically
** Changed in: maas Assignee: (unassigned) => LaMont Jones (lamont) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1379567 Title: maas-proxy is an open proxy with no ACLs; it should add networks automatically To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/1379567/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1556175] Re: networking.service hangs on shutdown -- killing dhclient has no effect any more
** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1556175 Title: networking.service hangs on shutdown -- killing dhclient has no effect any more To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1556175/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1553176] Re: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload
Fixed in alpha2 ** Changed in: maas Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: maas Milestone: None => 2.0.0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553176 Title: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bind/+bug/1553176/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1551351] Re: dhclient does not renew leases
The plan here is to restore the -export libraries for the time being, until upstream finishes the dhcp changes that are needed to have the common libs work. This is in-progress. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551351 Title: dhclient does not renew leases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1551351/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1528710] Re: overly agressive URLField validation causes failures
Any progress on getting this into xenial, or shall I just do an upload so that I quit hitting it and wait for the eventual merge? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to python-django in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1528710 Title: overly agressive URLField validation causes failures To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/django/+bug/1528710/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1553176] Re: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload
Fixed in 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P2-5 ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553176 Title: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bind/+bug/1553176/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1553176] Re: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload
This also affects 9.9.5 in trusty and later. ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Milestone: None => trusty-updates ** Branch linked: lp:~lamont/maas/packaging-bug-1553176 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553176 Title: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bind/+bug/1553176/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1553176] [NEW] BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload
Public bug reported: Since 2.6, linux has supported nanosecond granular time in stat(2) returns. BIND has a comment in the code that it might use it, but continues to ignore it. As of 9.9.3b2, named checks the time of (at least) zone files on disk (expanding to include include files in 9.10.0a2). Because the check is only done to a granularity of seconds, changing the zone file twice in the same second can cause BIND to decide that it need not reload the zone, even though it is out of date. ** Affects: bind Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: maas Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: bind9 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Patch added: "patch to fix the issue." https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553176/+attachment/4588314/+files/70_precise_time.diff ** Also affects: bind Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: maas Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553176 Title: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bind/+bug/1553176/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1552441] Re: [xenial] @{PROC}/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range denial
Fixed in 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P2-5
** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1552441
Title:
[xenial] @{PROC}/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range denial
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1552441/+subscriptions
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1546788] Re: Fresh install of Postfix 3.0.3-1~build1 will not start with instance conflict error
Fixed in 3.0.3-2, which eventually became 3.0.4-1 ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1546788 Title: Fresh install of Postfix 3.0.3-1~build1 will not start with instance conflict error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1546788/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1548594] [NEW] Convert test suite to python 3.0
Public bug reported: 3.0.4-1ubuntu1 uses python 2.7 instead of 3.0 for the test suite. This should be corrected: migrate the test suite to python 3.0. ** Affects: postfix (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1548594 Title: Convert test suite to python 3.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1548594/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1546788] Re: Fresh install of Postfix 3.0.3-1~build1 will not start with instance conflict error
Fixed in 3.0.3-2 ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1546788 Title: Fresh install of Postfix 3.0.3-1~build1 will not start with instance conflict error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1546788/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1538198] Re: python in xenial cloud image
Fixed in 3.0.3-1 ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1538198 Title: python in xenial cloud image To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1538198/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1547052] Re: bind9-host 9.10.X should not depend on bind9 (named)
** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => LaMont Jones (lamont) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547052 Title: bind9-host 9.10.X should not depend on bind9 (named) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1547052/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1547052] Re: bind9-host 9.10.X should not depend on bind9 (named)
There are several libraries that were misdelivered in the bind9 package instead of the correct lib$FOO package. I'm planning to have this fixed in -4. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547052 Title: bind9-host 9.10.X should not depend on bind9 (named) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1547052/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1547052] Re: bind9-host 9.10.X should not depend on bind9 (named)
There are several libraries that were misdelivered in the bind9 package instead of the correct lib$FOO package. I'm planning to have this fixed in -4. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547052 Title: bind9-host 9.10.X should not depend on bind9 (named) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1547052/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1528710] Re: overly agressive URLField validation causes failures
Without creating yet-another-login that I will generally never use, how should I go about creating a ticket upstream? Generally, if the bug is to be forwarded upstream, that is done by the package maintainer... See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting I guess I'll go file the bug with Debian and let the Debian maintainer forward it to the django project. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to python-django in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1528710 Title: overly agressive URLField validation causes failures To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-django/+bug/1528710/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1528710] Re: overly agressive URLField validation causes failures
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #814372 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814372 ** Also affects: python-django (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814372 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to python-django in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1528710 Title: overly agressive URLField validation causes failures To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/django/+bug/1528710/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1356012] Re: maas incorrectly overmanages DNS reverse zones
** Branch linked: lp:~lamont/maas/bug-1356012 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1356012 Title: maas incorrectly overmanages DNS reverse zones To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/1356012/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1356012] Re: maas incorrectly overmanages DNS reverse zones
** Branch linked: lp:~lamont/maas/rfc2317-small-subnet-rdns ** Changed in: maas/trunk Status: Fix Released => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1356012 Title: maas incorrectly overmanages DNS reverse zones To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/1356012/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1356012] Re: maas incorrectly overmanages DNS reverse zones
This will also entail adding a field to Subnet (default=True, changable
via the api, but we won't clutter the web UI with it) to also be
authoritative for the parent /24 zone and generate glue for the
/{25..30} rfc2317 zone.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1356012
Title:
maas incorrectly overmanages DNS reverse zones
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/1356012/+subscriptions
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1528966] [NEW] error from /etc/resolvconf/update-libc.d/squid3
Public bug reported: On a fresh xenial install, I get the following: -xenial(root) 269 : dhclient -i ens8 /etc/resolvconf/update-libc.d/squid3: 6: /etc/resolvconf/update-libc.d/squid3: status: not found -xenial(root) 270 : This is because squid3 checks its jobstatus in upstart, but xenial is systemd. It needs to check the appropriate job status. ** Affects: squid3 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: systemd -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to squid3 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1528966 Title: error from /etc/resolvconf/update-libc.d/squid3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid3/+bug/1528966/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1528710] [NEW] overly agressive URLField validation causes failures
Public bug reported: If the django site lives somewhere that the admins have declared a bogus top-level domain, and chosen to use an rfc1035-conforming name (with a hyphen in the middle of it), then django URLField validation considers the domain to be invalid. (I suspect that IANA hasn't released any TLDs with hyphens yet - making them the ideal choice right now for "something that won't be real".) That is to say: http://ubuntu-mirror.my-tld/ubuntu is flagged as an invalid URL, even though the DNS has an IP for it, and apt happily upgrades from the archive mirror that is there. Please fix the validator to allow hyphens in the tld_re. lamont ** Affects: python-django (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to python-django in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1528710 Title: overly agressive URLField validation causes failures To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-django/+bug/1528710/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1449099] Re: [SRU] bcache-tools to trusty and precise
Version 1.0.7-1~12.04.1 works on precise, with the needed (hwe-t) kernel. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bcache-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1449099 Title: [SRU] bcache-tools to trusty and precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcache-tools/+bug/1449099/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1356012] Re: maas incorrectly overmanages DNS reverse zones
** Changed in: maas/1.9 Assignee: (unassigned) => LaMont Jones (lamont) ** Changed in: maas/trunk Assignee: (unassigned) => LaMont Jones (lamont) ** Changed in: maas/trunk Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: maas/trunk Assignee: LaMont Jones (lamont) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: maas/1.9 Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: maas/trunk Assignee: (unassigned) => LaMont Jones (lamont) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1356012 Title: maas incorrectly overmanages DNS reverse zones To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/1356012/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1515661] Re: [SRU] sync 14.04 cloud-initramfs-tools to 12.04
I have verified this fix. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1515661 Title: [SRU] sync 14.04 cloud-initramfs-tools to 12.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas-images/+bug/1515661/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1449099] Re: [SRU] bcache-tools to trusty and precise
bcache-tools_1.0.7-1~12.04.1 (in my ppa) has been tested and is known to work. I'll be uploading that to precise-proposed shortly. lamont -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bcache-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1449099 Title: [SRU] bcache-tools to trusty and precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcache-tools/+bug/1449099/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1509147] Re: [SRU] MAAS 1.8.3
Of course, once the package is in the various -proposed, we'll do a final round of testing, including upgrade testing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1509147 Title: [SRU] MAAS 1.8.3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maas/+bug/1509147/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1510711] [NEW] if-pre-up.d/vlan should support brN.X interfaces
Public bug reported: A common name for bridge interfaces is 'br0'. Currently, the pre-up and post-down scripts do not support those, so the interaface fails to autocreate. Seen on trusty (1.9-3ubuntu10) and confirmed as not fixed on xenial (1.9-3.2ubuntu1) ** Affects: vlan (Ubuntu) Importance: Low Status: New ** Changed in: vlan (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to vlan in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1510711 Title: if-pre-up.d/vlan should support brN.X interfaces To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlan/+bug/1510711/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1382196] Re: Changing IP address for the region causes the cluster to ignore pserv.conf and endlessly respawn
If you change the IP address of the server, you need to dpkg-reconfigure maas-region-controller. ** Changed in: maas Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1382196 Title: Changing IP address for the region causes the cluster to ignore pserv.conf and endlessly respawn To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/1382196/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1272016] Re: Which interface to bind maas-region-controller to should be a debconf question
In cases where there is no clear "best default", a high-priority debconf question is warranted. If the package is being installed on a machine with multiple configured network interfaces, I don't think we have a clear "best" answer. OTOH, I think that if there is only one interface, then it makes sense to default to that and not bother the user. ** Changed in: maas Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1272016 Title: Which interface to bind maas-region-controller to should be a debconf question To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/1272016/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1272016] Re: Which interface to bind maas-region-controller to should be a debconf question
** Changed in: maas Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1272016 Title: Which interface to bind maas-region-controller to should be a debconf question To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/1272016/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1429857] Re: [MIR] bcache-tools
** Also affects: bcache-tools (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: bcache-tools (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bcache-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1429857 Title: [MIR] bcache-tools To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcache-tools/+bug/1429857/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1454775] [NEW] incorrect architecture label on i386 images
Public bug reported: Trusty's python-simplestreams uploads i386 images as architecture: i386, which nova filters out, since it is not 'i686'. See also http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~smoser/simplestreams/trunk/revision/366 Can we please get this into trusty-updates? thanks, lamont ** Affects: simplestreams (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Status: Confirmed ** Affects: simplestreams (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Medium Status: Confirmed ** Affects: simplestreams (Ubuntu Vivid) Importance: Medium Status: Confirmed ** Affects: simplestreams (Ubuntu Wily) Importance: Medium Status: Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to simplestreams in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1454775 Title: incorrect architecture label on i386 images To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/simplestreams/+bug/1454775/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 583216] Re: inet_protocols can't be preseeded
Looks good to me. I'll get it added into the debian source next time I upload. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583216 Title: inet_protocols can't be preseeded To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/583216/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1379132] [NEW] openvpn has a poor choice of default cipher, and does not negotiate
Public bug reported: all versions The default cipher for openvpn is BF-CBC (blowfish), which was likely once a good choice. Virtually all modern hardware has hardware acceleration/support for AES instructions, and can therefore do AES-128-CBC far faster and more efficiently than it can blowfish. Unfortunately, it also appears that openvpn doesn't negotiate the cipher at all, so it must match on both ends. 1) please enhance openvpn so that there is at least some negotiation (if the server specifies a cipher, and the client does not, then use the server's cipher) 2) change the default to be AES. thanks, lamont ** Affects: openvpn (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openvpn in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1379132 Title: openvpn has a poor choice of default cipher, and does not negotiate To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvpn/+bug/1379132/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1356012] Re: maas incorrectly overmanages DNS reverse zones
See also https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2317.txt for a very nice (still current best practice 16 years later) writeup on how to handle zones smaller than /24. If you guys have any other DNS questions, feel free to ask me, or one of the other admins. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1356012 Title: maas incorrectly overmanages DNS reverse zones To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/1356012/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1358586] Re: fails to deploy machines when eth0 does not exist
See also https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1335179 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1358586 Title: fails to deploy machines when eth0 does not exist To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maas/+bug/1358586/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1358306] [NEW] lxc postinst incorrectly chooses network address to use
Public bug reported: The lxc postinst assumes that only /24 networks are used in 10.0.0.0/8. If the host has a route for 10.0.0.2/23 (or 10.0.0.0/22, or any other block that includes 10.0.3.0/24 or whatever other block it is checking) then the postinst chooses a chunk of the existing network block, breaking connectivity. Preparing to unpack .../lxc_1.0.5-0ubuntu0.1_amd64.deb ... Unpacking lxc (1.0.5-0ubuntu0.1) ... Processing triggers for ureadahead (0.100.0-16) ... ureadahead will be reprofiled on next reboot Processing triggers for man-db (2.6.7.1-1) ... Setting up lxc (1.0.5-0ubuntu0.1) ... lxc start/running Setting up lxc dnsmasq configuration. Processing triggers for ureadahead (0.100.0-16) ... On branch master nothing to commit, working directory clean -soko(root) 308 : netstat -rn | grep ^10.0..\. 10.0.2.010.172.64.1 255.255.254.0 UG0 0 0 tun0 10.0.3.00.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 lxcbr0 ** Affects: lxc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1358306 Title: lxc postinst incorrectly chooses network address to use To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/1358306/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1358586] [NEW] fails to deploy machines when eth0 does not exist
Public bug reported: Trying to use MAAS to deploy a machine, it would go offline early in the deployment. It turns out that the networking was being overwritten to use br0 with eth0 as the underlying interface. The only problem is, there is no eth0 on the machine: 'em1' is the interface that has the network configured. This makes deploying the hardware with MAAS problematic, at best. ** Affects: maas (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1358586 Title: fails to deploy machines when eth0 does not exist To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maas/+bug/1358586/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1358586] Re: fails to deploy machines when eth0 does not exist
FWIW, the machine in question has this: cat /proc/net/dev Inter-| Receive| Transmit face |bytespackets errs drop fifo frame compressed multicast|bytes packets errs drop fifo colls carrier compressed lo: 0 0000 0 0 00 0000 0 0 0 rename5: 0 0000 0 0 00 0000 0 0 0 lxcbr0: 0 0000 0 0 0 4192 30000 0 0 0 em3: 0 0000 0 0 00 0000 0 0 0 em1: 35183692564000 0 0 0 124134 1389000 0 0 0 em2: 0 0000 0 0 00 0000 0 0 0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1358586 Title: fails to deploy machines when eth0 does not exist To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maas/+bug/1358586/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1356392] [NEW] lacks sw raid1 install support
Public bug reported: There is evidence in both the trusty and utopic versions of curtin that swraid support is on its way, but it appears to only think raid0 is needed/desirable, at least thus far. Installing machines that lack cciss (and therefore hardware raid) under MAAS, we would still like to have RAID1. I can see other uses where RAID5 or RAID10 might be a useful thing. ** Affects: curtin (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to curtin in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1356392 Title: lacks sw raid1 install support To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/curtin/+bug/1356392/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1356392] Re: lacks sw raid1 install support
Following up on a discussion from today with more detail. For metal in the datacenters, everything that can be RAID, is. The driving reason for this is to avoid a disk failure resulting in machine downtime. Given the number of drives in a modern datacenter, it's not a question of if a drive fails, but rather how many drive failures did we have this last week or two?. In almost all cases, we have hardware RAID controllers, and this reality is hidden from the operating system. In cases where we don't have a card (blades being today's example), we use software RAID (allowing operation with a degraded RAID) to achieve the same result. Generally speaking, we use RAID1, with RAID 5 when the drives aren't big enough and performance is less critical, RAID 10 where performance is critical (and the individual drives are too small for the job). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to curtin in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1356392 Title: lacks sw raid1 install support To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/curtin/+bug/1356392/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1356012] [NEW] maas incorrectly overmanages DNS reverse zones
Public bug reported: when I configure maas to manage DNS and DHCP for 10.89.64.0/20, it creates a reverse zone for 89.10.in-addr.arpa. If 10.89.0.0/16 is in use for other things, and only 10.89.64.0/20 was delegated to scalingstack, then no reverse DNS can happen, since the parent zone will win the argument. In this case, maas needs to create the following zones, and properly populate them (nsupdate will do the right thing if the zone declarations are correct): 64.89.10.in-addr.arpa 65.89.10.in-addr.arpa ... 78.89.10.in-addr.arpa 79.89.10.in-addr.arpa (a total of 16 zones.) Seen on trusty: ii maas-dns 1.5.2+bzr2282-0ubuntu0.2 all MAAS DNS server Please let me know what other information you need. lamont ** Affects: maas (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - maas incorrectly overmanages DNS + maas incorrectly overmanages DNS reverse zones -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1356012 Title: maas incorrectly overmanages DNS reverse zones To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maas/+bug/1356012/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1305232] Re: Postfix fails to start, failure to copy certificates
I will get this added to the package. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1305232 Title: Postfix fails to start, failure to copy certificates To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1305232/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1317716] [NEW] net_gateway behaves poorly when used twice
Public bug reported: with a precise server (openvpn 2.2.1-8ubuntu1.2) and trusty client (2.3.2-7ubuntu3): In the config, I had: push route xx.xx.xx.xx 255.255.255.255 net_gateway push route yy.yy.yy.yy 255.255.255.255 net_gateway (and another route for the /21 containing both of the hosts above). When the vpn comes up (on 192.168.1.50, with gw 192.168.1.1), we wind up with: 192.168.1.1 is routed dev tun0 xx.xx.xx.xx is routed via 192.168.1.1 dev tun0 yy.yy.yy.yy is routed via 192.168.1.1 dev eth0 (xx.xx.xx.xx is the endpoint for the vpn) Clearly this is wrong. If I only specify one IP (the vpn endpoint) via net_gateway, everything works correctly. lamont ** Affects: openvpn (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openvpn in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1317716 Title: net_gateway behaves poorly when used twice To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvpn/+bug/1317716/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1265877] [NEW] nova fails to launch i386 images
Public bug reported: in nova.conf: compute_scheduler_driver=nova.scheduler.filter_scheduler.FilterScheduler scheduler_default_filters=RetryFilter,AvailabilityZoneFilter,DiskFilter,CoreFilter,RamFilter,ComputeFilter,ComputeCapabilitiesFilter,ImagePropertiesFilter The openstack deployment has several compute nodes, all of them running 64-bit installs. The above config results in: vm_type:all does not support requested instance_properties host_passes /usr/lib/python2.7/dist- packages/nova/scheduler/filters/image_props_filter.py:83 And error-state for all attempts to launch a 32-bit image. The same applies with: compute_scheduler_driver=nova.scheduler.chance.ChanceScheduler Dropping ImagePropertiesFilter from the filters list fixes the issue, but clearly there is no reason that the 64-bit box cannot run a 32-bit image in a vm. lamont ** Affects: nova (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1265877 Title: nova fails to launch i386 images To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/1265877/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1265877] Re: nova fails to launch i386 images
We are seeing this in both: nova-scheduler=1:2013.1.4-0ubuntu1~cloud0 and nova-scheduler=1:2013.2-0ubuntu1~cloud0 lamont -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1265877 Title: nova fails to launch i386 images To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/1265877/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1263765] [NEW] snmpd does not notice when a disk is added
Public bug reported: snmpd does not notice when a disk is added to the system after snmpd is started. It should at a minimum arrange to do so. Observed in snmpd 5.4.3~dfsg-2.4ubuntu1.1 ** Affects: net-snmp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to net-snmp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1263765 Title: snmpd does not notice when a disk is added To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/net-snmp/+bug/1263765/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1229257] [NEW] assertion failure warnings output
Public bug reported: When I run various nova commands, stderr gets assertion failure warnings spewed on it. Unsure if this is a gobject issue, or a nova client issue, so marking it as both. lamot % nova list /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gobject/constants.py:24: Warning: g_boxed_type_register_static: assertion 'g_type_from_name (name) == 0' failed import gobject._gobject +--+---+++-++ ... (command functions normally other than the extraneous lines.) ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10 Package: python-gobject 3.9.92-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.11.0-7.14-generic 3.11.1 Uname: Linux 3.11.0-7-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.12.1-0ubuntu4 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Sep 23 09:44:37 2013 InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-04-22 (153 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 13.04 Raring Ringtail - Release amd64 (20130422) MarkForUpload: True PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: pygobject UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to saucy on 2013-09-17 (5 days ago) ** Affects: pygobject (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: python-novaclient (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug saucy ** Also affects: python-novaclient (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to python-novaclient in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1229257 Title: assertion failure warnings output To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pygobject/+bug/1229257/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1222179] Re: /usr/bin/mail has no package
Postfix delivers no /usr/bin/mail, nor any mail user agent. ** Package changed: postfix (Ubuntu) = bsd-mailx (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bsd-mailx in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1222179 Title: /usr/bin/mail has no package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bsd-mailx/+bug/1222179/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1222180] Re: postfix package produces errors in ubuntu-bug
Fixed in 2.10.2-1 ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu Saucy) Status: Triaged = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1222180 Title: postfix package produces errors in ubuntu-bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1222180/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1202278] Re: bind9 has no rate limit option
Fixed in 1:9.9.3.dfsg.P2-3 ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released ** Also affects: bind9 (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu Precise) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1202278 Title: bind9 has no rate limit option To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1202278/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 930280] Re: AppArmor profile for named prevents reading of samba4 zone and keytab
/var/tmp/* rw, I would much rather have named using some more protected directory, like maybe /var/cache/bind or some such. Otherwise I don't have any issue with this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930280 Title: AppArmor profile for named prevents reading of samba4 zone and keytab To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/930280/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1092243] Re: /etc/init.d/bind9: 92: [: pid:: unexpected operator
This will be in 1:9.9.3.dfsg.P2-4 ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1092243 Title: /etc/init.d/bind9: 92: [: pid:: unexpected operator To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1092243/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1099479] Re: /etc/init.d/bind9.dpkg-dist file is left over after upgrade
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1099458 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1099458 ** Summary changed: - /etc/init.d/bind9.dpkg-dist file is left over after lucid to precise main and universe upgrades + /etc/init.d/bind9.dpkg-dist file is left over after upgrade ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1099458 /etc/init.d/bind9.dpkg-dist file is left over after quantal to raring server upgrades -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1099479 Title: /etc/init.d/bind9.dpkg-dist file is left over after upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1099479/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1115168] Re: add --enable-filter-aaaa compilation option
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #701704 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=701704 ** Also affects: bind9 (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=701704 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1115168 Title: add --enable-filter- compilation option To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1115168/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 834901] Re: Apparmor profile blocks geoip db access
** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/834901 Title: Apparmor profile blocks geoip db access To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/834901/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1099458] Re: /etc/init.d/bind9.dpkg-dist file is left over after upgrade
** Summary changed: - /etc/init.d/bind9.dpkg-dist file is left over after quantal to raring server upgrades + /etc/init.d/bind9.dpkg-dist file is left over after upgrade -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1099458 Title: /etc/init.d/bind9.dpkg-dist file is left over after upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1099458/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1115168] Re: add --enable-filter-aaaa compilation option
** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1115168 Title: add --enable-filter- compilation option To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1115168/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1169044] Re: can't install/upgrade postfix non interactively through apt
This is specifically caused by having non-default smtp_recipient_restrictions, which changed behavior in 2.10, and postfix needs to know how you want to proceed. The answer to the question can be preseeded if you so desire. There is no bug here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1169044 Title: can't install/upgrade postfix non interactively through apt To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1169044/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1167512] [NEW] nova-network fails to start if bindir is not set
Public bug reported: The setup: - grizzly rc2 upgraded to grizzly (1:2013.1-0ubuntu1~cloud0), running on precise. - fresh install configured based on what appears to be a folsom howto Starting nova-network results in the following in the nova-network log: ... 2013-04-10 08:59:18.788 WARNING nova.db.sqlalchemy.api [req-8094076e-9813-42c4-968e-9dcb1f640659 69e6b81d4dbd41669313d522df780566 fdd2025e9254488dbe52919938c96edf] Change will make usage less than 0 for the following resources: ['fixed_ips'] 2013-04-10 08:59:19.098 ERROR nova.openstack.common.rpc.amqp [req-8094076e-9813-42c4-968e-9dcb1f640659 69e6b81d4dbd41669313d522df780566 fdd2025e9254488dbe52919938c96edf] Exception during message handling 2013-04-10 08:59:19.098 5003 TRACE nova.openstack.common.rpc.amqp Traceback (most recent call last): 2013-04-10 08:59:19.098 5003 TRACE nova.openstack.common.rpc.amqp File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nova/openstack/common/rpc/amqp.py, line 430, in _process_data 2013-04-10 08:59:19.098 5003 TRACE nova.openstack.common.rpc.amqp rval = self.proxy.dispatch(ctxt, version, method, **args) 2013-04-10 08:59:19.098 5003 TRACE nova.openstack.common.rpc.amqp File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nova/openstack/common/rpc/dispatcher.py, line 133, in dispatch 2013-04-10 08:59:19.098 5003 TRACE nova.openstack.common.rpc.amqp return getattr(proxyobj, method)(ctxt, **kwargs) 2013-04-10 08:59:19.098 5003 TRACE nova.openstack.common.rpc.amqp File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nova/network/floating_ips.py, line 187, in deallocate_for_instance 2013-04-10 08:59:19.098 5003 TRACE nova.openstack.common.rpc.amqp super(FloatingIP, self).deallocate_for_instance(context, **kwargs) 2013-04-10 08:59:19.098 5003 TRACE nova.openstack.common.rpc.amqp File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nova/network/manager.py, line 550, in deallocate_for_instance 2013-04-10 08:59:19.098 5003 TRACE nova.openstack.common.rpc.amqp self.deallocate_fixed_ip(context, fixed_ip['address'], host=host) 2013-04-10 08:59:19.098 5003 TRACE nova.openstack.common.rpc.amqp File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nova/network/manager.py, line 243, in deallocate_fixed_ip 2013-04-10 08:59:19.098 5003 TRACE nova.openstack.common.rpc.amqp address) 2013-04-10 08:59:19.098 5003 TRACE nova.openstack.common.rpc.amqp File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nova/network/manager.py, line 938, in deallocate_fixed_ip 2013-04-10 08:59:19.098 5003 TRACE nova.openstack.common.rpc.amqp self._teardown_network_on_host(context, network) 2013-04-10 08:59:19.098 5003 TRACE nova.openstack.common.rpc.amqp File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nova/network/manager.py, line 1630, in _teardown_network_on_host 2013-04-10 08:59:19.098 5003 TRACE nova.openstack.common.rpc.amqp self.driver.update_dhcp(elevated, dev, network) 2013-04-10 08:59:19.098 5003 TRACE nova.openstack.common.rpc.amqp File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nova/network/linux_net.py, line 938, in update_dhcp 2013-04-10 08:59:19.098 5003 TRACE nova.openstack.common.rpc.amqp restart_dhcp(context, dev, network_ref) 2013-04-10 08:59:19.098 5003 TRACE nova.openstack.common.rpc.amqp File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nova/openstack/common/lockutils.py, line 242, in inner 2013-04-10 08:59:19.098 5003 TRACE nova.openstack.common.rpc.amqp retval = f(*args, **kwargs) 2013-04-10 08:59:19.098 5003 TRACE nova.openstack.common.rpc.amqp File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nova/network/linux_net.py, line 1048, in restart_dhcp 2013-04-10 08:59:19.098 5003 TRACE nova.openstack.common.rpc.amqp _execute(*cmd, run_as_root=True) 2013-04-10 08:59:19.098 5003 TRACE nova.openstack.common.rpc.amqp File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nova/network/linux_net.py, line 1141, in _execute 2013-04-10 08:59:19.098 5003 TRACE nova.openstack.common.rpc.amqp return utils.execute(*cmd, **kwargs) 2013-04-10 08:59:19.098 5003 TRACE nova.openstack.common.rpc.amqp File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nova/utils.py, line 239, in execute 2013-04-10 08:59:19.098 5003 TRACE nova.openstack.common.rpc.amqp cmd=' '.join(cmd)) 2013-04-10 08:59:19.098 5003 TRACE nova.openstack.common.rpc.amqp ProcessExecutionError: Unexpected error while running command. 2013-04-10 08:59:19.098 5003 TRACE nova.openstack.common.rpc.amqp Command: sudo nova-rootwrap /etc/nova/rootwrap.conf env CONFIG_FILE=[/etc/nova/nova.conf] NETWORK_ID=1 dnsmasq --strict-order --bind-interfaces --conf-file= --domain=novalocal --pid-file=/var/lib/nova/networks/nova-eth0.pid --listen-address=172.28.20.1 --except-interface=lo --dhcp-range=set:private,172.28.20.2,static,120s --dhcp-lease-max=1024 --dhcp-hostsfile=/var/lib/nova/networks/nova-eth0.conf --dhcp-script=/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/bin/nova-dhcpbridge --leasefile-ro 2013-04-10 08:59:19.098 5003 TRACE nova.openstack.common.rpc.amqp Exit code: 3 2013-04-10 08:59:19.098 5003 TRACE nova.openstack.common.rpc.amqp Stdout: ''
[Bug 1166455] [NEW] nova flavor-list only shows 1000 flavors
Public bug reported: After I created a thousand new flavors (to enable some automation), with IDs 1000-1999, nova flavor-list now displays flavor 1, followed by 1000-1998, and then stops. Flavors 1999 and 2-6 are still valid and usable, just absent from the output of flavor-list (flavor-show is happy to provide details). (Also, performance seems to have been hurt by the number of flavors. Does it read all the data over the network before printing any of it??) The nova version in question is folsom. lamont ** Affects: nova (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1166455 Title: nova flavor-list only shows 1000 flavors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/1166455/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1166455] Re: nova flavor-list only shows 1000 flavors
** Tags added: prodstack -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1166455 Title: nova flavor-list only shows 1000 flavors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/1166455/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1157687] [NEW] Upgrade to raring fails in prerm
Public bug reported:
During an upgrade to raring (from quantal), the prerm script tries to
use things that are not defined. There are broken Dependencies in the
package.
Preparing to replace python-novaclient 1:2.9.0-0ubuntu1 (using
.../python-novaclient_1%3a2.11.1-0ubuntu1_all.deb) ...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site.py, line 562, in module
main()
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site.py, line 544, in main
known_paths = addusersitepackages(known_paths)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site.py, line 271, in addusersitepackages
user_site = getusersitepackages()
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site.py, line 246, in getusersitepackages
user_base = getuserbase() # this will also set USER_BASE
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site.py, line 236, in getuserbase
USER_BASE = get_config_var('userbase')
File /usr/lib/python2.7/sysconfig.py, line 548, in get_config_var
return get_config_vars().get(name)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/sysconfig.py, line 475, in get_config_vars
import re
File /usr/lib/python2.7/re.py, line 105, in module
import sre_compile
File /usr/lib/python2.7/sre_compile.py, line 14, in module
import sre_parse
File /usr/lib/python2.7/sre_parse.py, line 17, in module
from sre_constants import *
File /usr/lib/python2.7/sre_constants.py, line 18, in module
from _sre import MAXREPEAT
ImportError: cannot import name MAXREPEAT
dpkg: warning: subprocess old pre-removal script returned error exit status 1
dpkg: trying script from the new package instead ...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site.py, line 562, in module
main()
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site.py, line 544, in main
known_paths = addusersitepackages(known_paths)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site.py, line 271, in addusersitepackages
user_site = getusersitepackages()
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site.py, line 246, in getusersitepackages
user_base = getuserbase() # this will also set USER_BASE
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site.py, line 236, in getuserbase
USER_BASE = get_config_var('userbase')
File /usr/lib/python2.7/sysconfig.py, line 548, in get_config_var
return get_config_vars().get(name)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/sysconfig.py, line 475, in get_config_vars
import re
File /usr/lib/python2.7/re.py, line 105, in module
import sre_compile
File /usr/lib/python2.7/sre_compile.py, line 14, in module
import sre_parse
File /usr/lib/python2.7/sre_parse.py, line 17, in module
from sre_constants import *
File /usr/lib/python2.7/sre_constants.py, line 18, in module
from _sre import MAXREPEAT
ImportError: cannot import name MAXREPEAT
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/python-novaclient_1%3a2.11.1-0ubuntu1_all.deb
(--unpack):
subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 1
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site.py, line 562, in module
main()
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site.py, line 544, in main
known_paths = addusersitepackages(known_paths)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site.py, line 271, in addusersitepackages
user_site = getusersitepackages()
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site.py, line 246, in getusersitepackages
user_base = getuserbase() # this will also set USER_BASE
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site.py, line 236, in getuserbase
USER_BASE = get_config_var('userbase')
File /usr/lib/python2.7/sysconfig.py, line 548, in get_config_var
return get_config_vars().get(name)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/sysconfig.py, line 475, in get_config_vars
import re
File /usr/lib/python2.7/re.py, line 105, in module
import sre_compile
File /usr/lib/python2.7/sre_compile.py, line 14, in module
import sre_parse
File /usr/lib/python2.7/sre_parse.py, line 17, in module
from sre_constants import *
File /usr/lib/python2.7/sre_constants.py, line 18, in module
from _sre import MAXREPEAT
ImportError: cannot import name MAXREPEAT
dpkg: error while cleaning up:
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Affects: python-novaclient (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to python-novaclient in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1157687
Title:
Upgrade to raring fails in prerm
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-novaclient/+bug/1157687/+subscriptions
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1156223] Re: package postfix 2.10.0-2 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück
Fixed in 2.10.0-3 ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Won't Fix ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: Won't Fix = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1156223 Title: package postfix 2.10.0-2 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1156223/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1089342] Re: Postfix uses temporary IPv6 address for outbound connections
This is actually a bug in the ubuntu server settings. Servers should not have ipv6 privacy on by default, and postfix should honor what the admin has set. I'll revisit this and either close it with a reference to the other bug, or reassign it, as appropriate. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1089342 Title: Postfix uses temporary IPv6 address for outbound connections To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1089342/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1155730] [NEW] postfix 2.10 for raring
Public bug reported: Postfix 2.10 provides improved controls for reducing the risk of open relays. Also, we want to continue to offer the latest postfix to LTS users via backports and we need to get it into raring to do this. Attached is the upstream diff of the HISTORY file. ** Affects: postfix (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Assignee: Scott Kitterman (kitterman) Status: Fix Released ** Attachment added: Upstream HISTORY diff https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155730/+attachment/3576017/+files/diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155730 Title: postfix 2.10 for raring To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1155730/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1155730] Re: postfix 2.10 for raring
If approved, please sync 2.10.0-2 from debian. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155730 Title: postfix 2.10 for raring To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1155730/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1155730] Re: postfix 2.10 for raring
Fred - was that on a fresh install, or what version were you upgrading from? thanks, lamont -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155730 Title: postfix 2.10 for raring To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1155730/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1154667] [NEW] When tftpd was converted to upstart, xinetd support was dropped
Public bug reported: I need to run tftpd from xinetd, and that support was dropped when the init script was converted to upstart. Please restore the ability to run tftpd from xinetd. ** Affects: tftp-hpa (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tftp-hpa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1154667 Title: When tftpd was converted to upstart, xinetd support was dropped To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tftp-hpa/+bug/1154667/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1139159] Re: Postfix does not restart properly when using SSL
What is the value for smtp_tls_CApath in your configuration? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1139159 Title: Postfix does not restart properly when using SSL To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1139159/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1139159] Re: Postfix does not restart properly when using SSL
Finally saw what was meant there. Confirmed, doing the mkdir
${dest_dir}.NEW will be unconditional (inside that box) as of 2.10.0-1
** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = LaMont Jones (lamont)
** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1139159
Title:
Postfix does not restart properly when using SSL
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1139159/+subscriptions
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1090593] Re: D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET changing January 3rd 2013
An SRU into existing releases makes good sense. The change is very minimal, with the biggest risk being that somepoint after the current operator of D stops using the IP address, said address gets assigned to someone who decides that giving out the wrong answers would be a thing to do. I don't see that as even remotely likely. As for what the issue actually causes: it slows down lookups a very very small fraction of the time, since BIND does round-trip time tracking on requests, and prefers hosts that answer faster, and rarely queries the root nameservers (most TLDs are 2 day TTLs) in any case. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1090593 Title: D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET changing January 3rd 2013 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1090593/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1090593] Re: D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET changing January 3rd 2013
I've uploaded SRU-able versions of the package to my personal ppa. See https://launchpad.net/~lamont/+archive/ppa/+packages -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1090593 Title: D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET changing January 3rd 2013 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1090593/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1094052] [NEW] default install of snmpd leaks memory when VLAN interfaces present
Public bug reported: See Debian bug #510495 - when vlans are configured, snmpd leaks memory. Definitely observed in 5.4.1~dfsg-4ubuntu4.4. ** Affects: net-snmp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: net-snmp (Debian) Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #510495 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=510495 ** Also affects: net-snmp (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=510495 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to net-snmp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1094052 Title: default install of snmpd leaks memory when VLAN interfaces present To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/net-snmp/+bug/1094052/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1027061] Re: Postfix upgrade to 2.9.3-2~12.04.1 changes configuration files
I suspect that the issue here is that the config file was modified (values set) during install, and then the file changed outside of debconf later, and then installed again, resulting in postfix honoring the debconf values it had been told to enforce. There are several values that postfix expects you will only set using debconf or only not-using debconf. mixing that makes for bad times. Since the non-debconf piece here appears to be puppet, one would expect puppet to quickly re-enforce the config state and make this a non- issue... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1027061 Title: Postfix upgrade to 2.9.3-2~12.04.1 changes configuration files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1027061/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1059899] Re: nova fails to configure dnsmasq, resulting in DNS timeouts in instances
As discussed in IRC: If the domain I assign to nova is its own (which I believe it should be), then it should be authoritative for that zone. As in it shouldn't go asking the upstream resolver to give it answers for things that are delegated to it. This is also true of the reverse zone for the IP blocks that are assigned to nova networks (public and private). That is, forward and reverse zones should be handed to dnsmasq in server= declarations based on the network and DNS config of the network. Alternatively, running an actual nameserver would be an option, as would having nova-network use nsupdate to update such a beast. --dns_server doesn't do the trick, since (a) multiple domains are involved and (b) nova already has the answers - making the admin tell it twice is just asking for errors. Please let me know if there are any more questions on the subject. ** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1059899 Title: nova fails to configure dnsmasq, resulting in DNS timeouts in instances To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/1059899/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1059899] [NEW] nova fails to configure dnsmasq, resulting in DNS timeouts in instances
Public bug reported: Nova uses dnsmasq to answer questions about name - IP resolution for instances. By default, it does nothing about things where there is no answer. This causes dnsmasq to forward the query (for which it should be authoritative) off to the nameserver found in resolv.conf. If the zone is properly delegated to nova via a forward only zone declaration in the resolver, then we run into the situation where the instance asks dnsmasq which asks the resolver which asks dnsmasq which then times out. Combine this with linux' love for IPv6, and a single domain search list in resolv.conf, and anything that looks up a host name (e.g., sudo) will take 10 seconds (5 seconds each for the lookup of $(hostname).$domain and $(hostname) RRs), before it fails back to looking up $(hostname).$domain A RR and gets an answer. The fix that worked for us was to add --dnsmasq_config_file=/etc/nova/dnsmasq.conf (not --dns_server, because we DO NOT WANT -h and -R passed to dnsmasq, and we need to specify multiple --server directives) and then dnsmasq.conf gets --server=/xxx.yyy.10.in-addr.arpa/ --server=/openstack.example.com/ which tells it to not forward queries for those zones off-machine. (The lack of -h and -R means that we do not break our ability to resolute the rest of the DNS world.) ** Affects: nova (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1059899 Title: nova fails to configure dnsmasq, resulting in DNS timeouts in instances To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/1059899/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1037738] [NEW] race condition in init script
Public bug reported: ifup -a with lots of new interfaces exposes a race condition in the init script: lamont --- ssh start/running, process 9328 Set name-type for VLAN subsystem. Should be visible in /proc/net/vlan/config cat: /var/run/sshd.pid: No such file or directory ERROR: List of process IDs must follow -p. ** Affects: openssh (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1037738 Title: race condition in init script To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1037738/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1021708] [NEW] no CLI interface to find all of the tenants which a given user belongs to
Public bug reported: There does not seem to be a CLI, nor does the python api appear to provide a way (other than iteration) to find all of the tenants to which a user belongs. I basically want the rough equivalent of the following sql: SELECT tenant.* FROM tenant,user_tenant_membership WHERE user_tenant_membership.user_id = $USERID AND user_tenant_membersip.tenant_id = tenant.id; ** Affects: keystone (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1021708 Title: no CLI interface to find all of the tenants which a given user belongs to To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keystone/+bug/1021708/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 583216] Re: inet_protocols can't be preseeded
** Also affects: postfix (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=671235 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583216 Title: inet_protocols can't be preseeded To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/583216/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 995285] [NEW] if /etc/sudoers.d/nova_sudoers is removed, upgrades fail
Public bug reported: dpkg --configure -a Setting up nova-common (2012.1-0ubuntu2.1) ... chmod: cannot access `/etc/sudoers.d/nova_sudoers': No such file or directory dpkg: error processing nova-common (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of nova-network: nova-network depends on nova-common (= 2012.1-0ubuntu2.1); however: Package nova-common is not configured yet. The package should survive the upgrade even without the sudoers file there. ** Affects: nova (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/995285 Title: if /etc/sudoers.d/nova_sudoers is removed, upgrades fail To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/995285/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 994779] [NEW] changing the IP address of the maas server requires a reinstall
Public bug reported: For a variety of reasons, I wound up needing to change the IP address of a MAAS server. Doing what it said to do at install time (dpkg --reconfigure maas) was insufficient, and I eventually just reinstalled the machine as the final fallback solution to fixing the config to the new IP address. Changing the IP address is not a common thing, but it happens often enough (due to moves, etc) that it should be made trivial to do. ** Affects: maas Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: maas (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: maas Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994779 Title: changing the IP address of the maas server requires a reinstall To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/994779/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 994781] [NEW] removing a node when it has failed commissioning is not possible from the UI
Public bug reported: If a node failed to commission, and I wish simply to remove it from maas completely, there is no way to do that from the UI, since the remove node button is greyed out at that stage. I believe that the failed state is the same way. ** Affects: maas Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: maas (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: maas (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994781 Title: removing a node when it has failed commissioning is not possible from the UI To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/994781/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 994887] [NEW] /MAAS/nodes page needs sorting abilities
Public bug reported: When viewing /MAAS/nodes, it is sometimes useful to sort by hostname (which may have actually been assigned to something other than the nodename based on MAC address, as it was in our case). Today that can only be done by cut-n-paste piped into sort, which is suboptimal. ** Affects: maas Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: maas (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: maas Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994887 Title: /MAAS/nodes page needs sorting abilities To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/994887/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 989304] Re: package postfix 2.9.1-4 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 75
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 980682 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/980682 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 980682 postconf can't open main.cf with the result that /etc/resolvconf/update-libc.d/postfix fails trying to copy /etc/resolv.conf onto itself -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989304 Title: package postfix 2.9.1-4 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 75 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/989304/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 980682] Re: postconf can't open main.cf with the result that /etc/resolvconf/update-libc.d/postfix fails trying to copy /etc/resolv.conf onto itself
Fixed in 2.9.1-5 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/980682 Title: postconf can't open main.cf with the result that /etc/resolvconf /update-libc.d/postfix fails trying to copy /etc/resolv.conf onto itself To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/980682/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 980682] Re: postconf can't open main.cf with the result that /etc/resolvconf/update-libc.d/postfix fails trying to copy /etc/resolv.conf onto itself
Bad code from 2007, I believe that simply making sure that the queue directory is non-null before copying will fix it. ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = LaMont Jones (lamont) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/980682 Title: postconf can't open main.cf with the result that /etc/resolvconf /update-libc.d/postfix fails trying to copy /etc/resolv.conf onto itself To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/980682/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 980798] Re: incorrect owner '644' for /etc/bind/named.conf.options
apparently, it's spelled 'chmod', not 'chown' :( ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Committed ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = LaMont Jones (lamont) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/980798 Title: incorrect owner '644' for /etc/bind/named.conf.options To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/980798/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 970921] Re: Postfix 2.9.1 Crashing with Signal 6 - Postfix 2.8.5-2 works perfectly
I am unable to reproduce this, but I also lack the mysql setup to really test this well. Try this: # cp /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 /var/spool/postfix/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 and see if the problem goes away, (you may need to repeat that if strace gives you yet a different library that must be installed... If that doesn't fix it, perhaps you can toss me a more complete sample to reproduce the issue. thanks, lamont -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/970921 Title: Postfix 2.9.1 Crashing with Signal 6 - Postfix 2.8.5-2 works perfectly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/970921/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 970921] Re: Postfix 2.9.1 Crashing with Signal 6 - Postfix 2.8.5-2 works perfectly
I will be in -3, with a changelog entry that is a bit vague about this bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/970921 Title: Postfix 2.9.1 Crashing with Signal 6 - Postfix 2.8.5-2 works perfectly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/970921/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 970921] Re: Postfix 2.9.1 Crashing with Signal 6 - Postfix 2.8.5-2 works perfectly
fixed in 2.9.1-3 ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Committed ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = LaMont Jones (lamont) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/970921 Title: Postfix 2.9.1 Crashing with Signal 6 - Postfix 2.8.5-2 works perfectly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/970921/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 978698] Re: sqlite maps are broken in postfix 2.9.1-2
Will be in 2.9.1-3 ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Committed ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = LaMont Jones (lamont) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/978698 Title: sqlite maps are broken in postfix 2.9.1-2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/978698/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 970921] Re: Postfix 2.9.1 Crashing with Signal 6 - Postfix 2.8.5-2 works perfectly
I don't suppose that /var/spool/postfix has a core file in it? if so, that would be wonderful to have -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/970921 Title: Postfix 2.9.1 Crashing with Signal 6 - Postfix 2.8.5-2 works perfectly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/970921/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 877150] Re: postfix debconf instructions typo
The wording was ambiguous, though correct, given that the postinst only appends an entry. I've updated the text to be less ambiguous. ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Committed ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = LaMont Jones (lamont) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/877150 Title: postfix debconf instructions typo To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/877150/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 933723] Re: resolvconf creating bogus resolv.conf file
** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933723 Title: resolvconf creating bogus resolv.conf file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/933723/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 681536] Re: /usr/share/bind9/bind9-default.md5sum should be in conffiles
** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681536 Title: /usr/share/bind9/bind9-default.md5sum should be in conffiles To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/681536/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
