[Bug 1436710] [NEW] package libnss3-nssdb 2:3.17.4-0ubuntu0.14.10.1 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration

2015-03-26 Thread Milan Marsic
Public bug reported:

There is always an error message when I start my computer, sometimes 2. It´s 
been several months now, and also I cannot update, there is also always an 
error message when I´m trying to update..
thank you

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10
Package: libnss3-nssdb 2:3.17.4-0ubuntu0.14.10.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.16.0-31.41-generic 3.16.7-ckt5
Uname: Linux 3.16.0-31-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.14.7-0ubuntu8.2
Architecture: amd64
Date: Wed Mar 25 17:07:09 2015
DuplicateSignature: package:libnss3-nssdb:2:3.17.4-0ubuntu0.14.10.1:package is 
in a very bad inconsistent state; you should  reinstall it before attempting 
configuration
ErrorMessage: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should  
reinstall it before attempting configuration
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: nss
Title: package libnss3-nssdb 2:3.17.4-0ubuntu0.14.10.1 failed to 
install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should  
reinstall it before attempting configuration
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to utopic on 2014-10-29 (147 days ago)

** Affects: nss (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package need-duplicate-check utopic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nss in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1436710

Title:
  package libnss3-nssdb 2:3.17.4-0ubuntu0.14.10.1 failed to
  install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you
  should  reinstall it before attempting configuration

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nss/+bug/1436710/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1015041] Re: Conflict between NTP and NTPDATE

2012-08-21 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015041

Title:
  Conflict between NTP and NTPDATE

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/1015041/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1015041] Re: Conflict between NTP and NTPDATE

2012-06-19 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Have you tried reinstalling ntpdate to check it's really its fault? I
don't see how it could create delays when logging in. Also please attach
/var/log/daemon.log and ~/.xsession-errors when the problem happens.

** Package changed: gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu) = ntp (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015041

Title:
  Conflict between NTP and NTPDATE

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/1015041/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1015041] Re: Conflict between NTP and NTPDATE

2012-06-19 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Jun 19 16:26:51 josef-Xubuntu rtkit-daemon[1683]: Successfully made thread 1681 
of process 1681 (n/a) owned by '1000' high priority at nice level -11.
Jun 19 16:26:51 josef-Xubuntu rtkit-daemon[1683]: Supervising 1 threads of 1 
processes of 1 users.
Jun 19 16:26:52 josef-Xubuntu rtkit-daemon[1683]: Successfully made thread 1697 
of process 1681 (n/a) owned by '1000' RT at priority 5.
Jun 19 16:26:52 josef-Xubuntu rtkit-daemon[1683]: Supervising 2 threads of 1 
processes of 1 users.
Jun 19 16:26:52 josef-Xubuntu rtkit-daemon[1683]: Successfully made thread 1698 
of process 1681 (n/a) owned by '1000' RT at priority 5.
Jun 19 16:26:52 josef-Xubuntu rtkit-daemon[1683]: Supervising 3 threads of 1 
processes of 1 users.
Jun 19 16:26:52 josef-Xubuntu rtkit-daemon[1683]: Successfully made thread 1703 
of process 1703 (n/a) owned by '1000' high priority at nice level -11.
Jun 19 16:26:52 josef-Xubuntu rtkit-daemon[1683]: Supervising 4 threads of 2 
processes of 1 users.
Jun 19 16:26:52 josef-Xubuntu pulseaudio[1703]: [pulseaudio] pid.c: Daemon 
already running.

Could you have a look to find out what was/is process 1681?

Please also attach ~/.xsession-errors.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015041

Title:
  Conflict between NTP and NTPDATE

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/1015041/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 970921] Re: Postfix 2.9.1 Crashing with Signal 6 - Postfix 2.8.5-2 works perfectly

2012-04-12 Thread Milan
Your suggestion,

# cp /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 /var/spool/postfix/lib/x86_64
-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1

fixes the problem here. I also use postfix-mysql for mail aliases etc. I
didn't even know that Postfix needs so many files in its chroot.

Thanks for your help. I assume this will be fixed in the Postfix
packages?

Regards,
Milan

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/970921

Title:
  Postfix 2.9.1 Crashing with Signal 6 - Postfix 2.8.5-2 works perfectly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/970921/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 970921] Re: Postfix 2.9.1 Crashing with Signal 6 - Postfix 2.8.5-2 works perfectly

2012-04-08 Thread Milan
I observe the very same behaviour on 12.04: The processes cleanup,
rewrite and smtpd crash with signal 6 if they are within a chroot. (In
the default configuration, chroots are used for these processes and it
works here e.g. on Ubuntu 10.04).

Sample log message:

Apr  8 15:57:29 two postfix/master[7938]: warning: process 
/usr/lib/postfix/smtpd pid 7946 killed by signal 6
Apr  8 15:57:29 two postfix/master[7938]: warning: /usr/lib/postfix/smtpd: bad 
command startup -- throttling

I did an strace -s 4096 -f of the postfix master process with smtpd et
al. in chroot, and I believe that these are the relevant parts:

(process 7938 is the postfix master process)

7938  clone(child_stack=0, 
flags=CLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID|CLONE_CHILD_SETTID|SIGCHLD, 
child_tidptr=0x7f71f2a439d0) = 7946
...
7946  execve(/usr/lib/postfix/smtpd, [smtpd, -n, 127.0.0.1:25, -t, 
inet, -u, -c, -o, smtpd_tls_auth_only=no], [/* 4 vars */]) = 0
...
7946  chroot(/var/spool/postfix)  = 0
...
7946  clone(child_stack=0x7f95d51cbff0, 
flags=CLONE_VM|CLONE_FS|CLONE_FILES|CLONE_SIGHAND|CLONE_THREAD|CLONE_SYSVSEM|CLONE_SETTLS|CLONE_PARENT_SETTID|CLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID,
 parent_tidptr=0x7f95d51cc9d0, tls=0x7f95d51cc700, child_tidptr=0x7f95d51cc9d0) 
= 7954
7954  set_robust_list(0x7f95d51cc9e0, 0x18) = 0
7954  open(/etc/ld.so.cache, O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or 
directory)
...
7954  open(/dev/tty, O_RDWR|O_NOCTTY|O_NONBLOCK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or 
directory)
7954  writev(2, [{libgcc_s.so.1 must be installed for pthread_cancel to 
work\n, 59}], 1) = 59
7954  mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) 
= 0x7f95d88ca000
7954  rt_sigprocmask(SIG_UNBLOCK, [ABRT], NULL, 8) = 0
7954  tgkill(7946, 7954, SIGABRT)   = 0
7954  --- SIGABRT (Aborted) @ 0 (0) ---
...
7946  +++ killed by SIGABRT +++
...
7938  wait4(-1, [{WIFSIGNALED(s)  WTERMSIG(s) == SIGABRT}], WNOHANG, NULL) = 
7946
7938  sendto(3, 20Apr  8 15:57:29 postfix/master[7938]: warning: process 
/usr/lib/postfix/smtpd pid 7946 killed by signal 6, 109, MSG_NOSIGNAL, NULL, 
0) = 109
7938  sendto(3, 20Apr  8 15:57:29 postfix/master[7938]: warning: 
/usr/lib/postfix/smtpd: bad command startup -- throttling, 108, MSG_NOSIGNAL, 
NULL, 0) = 108


However, I haven't investigated what to do about that.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/970921

Title:
  Postfix 2.9.1 Crashing with Signal 6 - Postfix 2.8.5-2 works perfectly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/970921/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 585053] Re: no user interface to configure whether time synchronisation is always made on establishing the network connection.

2010-05-24 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
But that's not a problem with time-admin, which is not supposed to
control ntpdate at all. It's just that ntpdate shouldn't run by ifup
when interfaces are enabled. Else, there's no point in optionally
installing the ntp daemon.

I suspect ntpdate is not run when your connections are managed using
NetworkManager instead of ifup, which could explain why this bug has
gone unnoticed. If it's the case, that would be a workaround, anyway
NetworkManager is the preferred way to handle connections on desktops
now.

I don't think disabling ntpdate by default would hurt, no application
should rely on it.

From https://help.ubuntu.com/10.04/serverguide/C/NTP.html:
 Ubuntu comes with ntpdate as standard, and will run it once at
 boot time to set up your time according to Ubuntu's NTP server.

So it may well be that server settings are used on desktops, where it
doesn't really make sense, since we get an inconsistent behavior with
the GUI.


** Package changed: gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu) = ntp (Ubuntu)

** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Triaged

** Summary changed:

- no user interface to configure whether time synchronisation is always made on 
establishing the network connection.
+ ntpdate shouldn't be run by ifup on desktops (conflict with time-admin's NTP 
options)

-- 
ntpdate shouldn't be run by ifup on desktops (conflict with time-admin's NTP 
options)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585053
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 585053] Re: ntpdate shouldn't be run by ifup on desktops (conflict with time-admin's NTP options)

2010-05-24 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 322518 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322518

OK, I've just found bug 322518 which is about the same issue.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 322518
   No obvious way to prevent ntpdate to be run when interface are brought up

-- 
ntpdate shouldn't be run by ifup on desktops (conflict with time-admin's NTP 
options)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585053
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 322518] Re: No obvious way to prevent ntpdate to be run when interface are brought up

2010-05-24 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
I'd argue ntpdate shouldn't be started at all by default. I can see no
reason why people would prefer using ntpdate rather than ntpd. Desktops
should ship without NTP enabled (i.e. ntp package not installed, but
installable via time-admin), and server should ship with it installed.

Current situation conflicts with time-admin's options, and is not really
optimal for servers either (time should be updated smoothly via ntpd).

** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Wishlist = Low

-- 
No obvious way to prevent ntpdate to be run when interface are brought up
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322518
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 583994] Re: Consider replacing ntpdate calls by 'ntpd -g'

2010-05-24 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
See also bug 322518. I think we want to get rid of ntpdate, and use ntpd
everywhere, which would be more consistent.

** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Triaged

** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Low

-- 
Consider replacing ntpdate calls by 'ntpd -g'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583994
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 83604] Re: ntpdate 1:4.2.2.p4+dfsg-1ubuntu2 has a flawed configuration file.

2010-05-24 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Is this still buggy in Lucid?

Anyway, I think fixing bug 583994 by replacing ntpdate with ntpd would
solve this the right way.

-- 
ntpdate 1:4.2.2.p4+dfsg-1ubuntu2 has a flawed configuration file.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83604
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 546874] Re: passwd - can't login, change password (pam_winbind pam-auth-update profile)

2010-05-04 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
If the workarounds above didn't work, why do you think that's the same
bug at all? I think you should open a new report.

The other issue is that if you actually upgraded your system using 'apt-
get upgrade' (not even 'dist-upgrade'?!), that's not the correct
procedure and is likely to break. See
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/LucidUpgrades.

-- 
passwd - can't login, change password (pam_winbind pam-auth-update profile)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/546874
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 157215] Re: [jaunty] Synchronizing with a time server does not work when time difference is greater than several hours

2010-01-04 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
If you are willing to help debugging this, then please run 'sudo ntpd
-q' and report its output, and whether that fixes the problem. Is your
clock highly different from the real hour, i.e. by hours as the title of
the bug says?

-- 
[jaunty] Synchronizing with a time server does not work when time difference is 
greater than several hours
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157215
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 283811] Re: cups says can't promp for authorization when printing to my samba printer

2009-12-03 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
I think the wrong behavior on failure was fixed, but the real support
for authentication has still not be committed. That's another bug
report, I guess it will go into Lucid.

** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #553690
   https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=553690

** Changed in: gtk
   Status: Fix Released = Unknown

** Changed in: gtk
 Remote watch: GNOME Bug Tracker #384940 = GNOME Bug Tracker #553690

-- 
cups says can't promp for authorization when printing to my samba printer
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283811
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 288052] Re: /etc/resolv.conf inserts commas between Search Domains

2009-11-23 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Thanks. So that's a bug with dhclient, I hope somebody more aware of its
behavior will be able to help.

** Package changed: gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu) = dhcp3 (Ubuntu)

** Changed in: dhcp3 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Confirmed

-- 
/etc/resolv.conf inserts commas between Search Domains
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/288052
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dhcp3 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 479493] Re: NTP services installation crashes

2009-11-11 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Thanks for your report. I think you were right, this is a problem in ntp
and not in the gnome-system-tools. But luckily, I believe I've already
seen this problem, which has its root cause in yet another package (gdm-
guest-session).

The interesting part of the log is:
 Setting up ntp (1:4.2.4p6+dfsg-1ubuntu5) ...
 useradd: cannot lock /etc/passwd; try again later.
 adduser: `/usr/sbin/useradd -d /home/ntp -g ntp -s /bin/false -u 117 ntp' 
 returned error code 1. Exiting.

One workaround is to remove /etc/passwd.lock, and then to run 'sudo dpkg
--configure -a'. I think you're suffering from bug 432964. Can you
confirm the workaround is the right one?


** Changed in: gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

** Package changed: gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu) = ntp (Ubuntu)

-- 
NTP services installation crashes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/479493
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 479493] Re: NTP services installation crashes

2009-11-11 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 432964 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432964

Thanks for the feedback. Marking as duplicate then.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 432964
   System crash in guest session locks /etc/passwd forever

-- 
NTP services installation crashes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/479493
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 449702] Re: [time-admin] ntp.ubuntu.com doesn't appear in server list just after you enable NTP

2009-10-15 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
I meant, commit something (i.e. unselect all servers) when you close the
program after installing NTP support but not changing anything.

-- 
[time-admin] ntp.ubuntu.com doesn't appear in server list just after you enable 
NTP
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449702
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 449702] Re: Default ntp server list doesn't have any servers enabled

2009-10-12 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
I thought ntp.ubuntu.com was checked by default. But as I've upgraded
from Jaunty, I can't be sure that it's the case in Karmic. Anyway,
that's likely to be a bug in ntp - installing it from the command line
should also set it up automatically.

** Package changed: gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu) = ntp (Ubuntu)

-- 
Default ntp server list doesn't have any servers enabled
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449702
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 296327] Re: smb:/// No application is registered as handling this file

2009-01-06 Thread Milan
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 305030 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305030

I don't know what I want you to test since your report is not clear to
me. There's bug 305030 about not being able to print from GTK+ apps
(including Evince). The problem you report here is not a standard
usecase, this is why  I marked your bug as a duplicate. In bug 305030
you'll find more informations.

-- 
smb:/// No application is registered as handling this file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296327
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 296327] Re: smb:/// No application is registered as handling this file

2008-12-30 Thread Milan
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 305030 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305030

Do you think your present problem is the cause of that bug in Evince? I
don't expect so. The problem you mention in the report is an intended
behavior and has nothing to do with bug 305030 which comes from GTK+.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 305030
   Failed to print document - can't prompt for authorization

-- 
smb:/// No application is registered as handling this file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296327
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 296327] Re: smb:/// No application is registered as handling this file

2008-12-28 Thread Milan
Why do you think you cannot print because of this problem? Just set up
your printer using System-Administration-Printing.

** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Incomplete

-- 
smb:/// No application is registered as handling this file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296327
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs