[Bug 721320] Re: DKIM-related failures should not end up in the panic log

2011-07-12 Thread Niko Ehrenfeuchter
Ok, so what's the plan regarding the long term in LTS? There is a fix
released upstream, but nothing happened with the exim4 package in lucid.

To quote the inital reporter of this bug: Can we please have a backport
of this fix for Lucid - it makes running an Exim mailserver painful on
that release.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to exim4 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721320

Title:
  DKIM-related failures should not end up in the panic log

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/721320/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 721320] Re: DKIM-related failures should not end up in the panic log

2011-07-12 Thread Niko Ehrenfeuchter
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #567876
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=567876

** Also affects: exim4 (Debian) via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=567876
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

** Bug watch added: bugs.exim.org/ #966
   http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966

** Also affects: exim via
   http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to exim4 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721320

Title:
  DKIM-related failures should not end up in the panic log

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/exim/+bug/721320/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 563805] Re: mount.cifs won't mount shares; set uid bit not set

2010-05-19 Thread Niko Ehrenfeuchter
I think Dietmar's comment #5 is pretty interesting: the binaries in 9.10
did *NOT* have the suid-bit set, but it definitely worked for me back
then (and for others too, as they reported). So there must have been a
way to make this work. Have there been any of the mechanisms mentioned
by Wladimir involved in 9.10?

-- 
mount.cifs won't mount shares; set uid bit not set
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563805
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs