[Bug 740815]

2011-07-19 Thread Pbiggar
Ionut, you can get this added to SpiderMonkey for the next release by
filing a bug for it in the Core/Javascript component (that same
component as this). If you have a patch, mark it for review by setting
r? to 'pbig...@mozilla.com' and I can review it for you.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to gwt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815

Title:
  [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/740815/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 740815]

2011-03-27 Thread Pbiggar
(In reply to comment #21)
  Would you take a patch to add one, say
 spidermonkey-185.pc?

Can you add this to the tracemonkey repo too?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to gwt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815

Title:
  [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 740815]

2011-03-27 Thread Pbiggar
(Apologies if this is bikeshedding or a repeat of previous discussion)

(In reply to comment #29)
 Mike -- I named the library libmozjs185.so rather than libmozjs.so 
 specifically
 because it doesn't work as a drop-in for any previously-released libmozjs.so
 (not even close -- see the release notes).

Since we're deliberately changing the name, maybe libspidermonkey is a
better name? I agree that putting 185 in the name isn't good. When we
change to 1.9.0, would we have to change the SO name? That can't be
right.


 Versioning the spidermonkey library based on the JavaScript version it
 implements (1.8.5) doesn't make much sense to me; I prefer to think of this as
 version 1.0.0 of the library which implements JavaScript 1.8.5.  Trying to
 connect solib versioning with language versioning has, at least in the past,
 been completely and utterly futile.

I believe that the 1.8.5 numbering scheme is a pretty bad one, and is
only there because of history. Perhaps we should change it; maybe to the
Firefox version number or the Gecko one.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to gwt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815

Title:
  [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs