[Bug 1536882] Re: upload golang1.6 package for trusty

2016-02-22 Thread Peter Matulis
** Tags added: docteam

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to golang in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1536882

Title:
  upload golang1.6 package for trusty

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang/+bug/1536882/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 507728] Re: man page missing for slapo-nssov

2016-02-15 Thread Peter Matulis
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Wishlist => Low

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507728

Title:
  man page missing for slapo-nssov

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/507728/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1523567] [NEW] login greeter misspells OpenStack

2015-12-07 Thread Peter Matulis
Public bug reported:

The login greeter for Horizon on Ubuntu has OpenStack misspelled as
'Openstack'.

** Affects: horizon (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Attachment added: "horizon_login.png"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1523567/+attachment/4531017/+files/horizon_login.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to horizon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1523567

Title:
  login greeter misspells OpenStack

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/horizon/+bug/1523567/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1452087] Re: slapd [or its init script] does not create necessary directory for nssov socket and fails to start

2015-05-05 Thread Peter Matulis
Can you check /var/log/kern.log to see if this is an apparmor issue?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1452087

Title:
  slapd [or its init script] does not create necessary directory for
  nssov socket and fails to start

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1452087/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1232258] Re: tomcat7 installer fails to create symbolic links

2015-03-24 Thread Peter Matulis
Removed Ubuntu Server Guide as affected.  This is a software problem.

** No longer affects: serverguide

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat7 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1232258

Title:
  tomcat7 installer fails to create symbolic links

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat7/+bug/1232258/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1395098] [NEW] [Utopic] OpenLDAP version is outdated

2014-11-21 Thread Peter Matulis
Public bug reported:

Debian unstable has openldap at version 2.4.40 but the version in the
latest stable Ubuntu release (14.10) is 2.4.31 (released upstream in
April 2012).  A lot of bugs have been fixed since then [1].

Please put version 2.4.40 into the next release of Ubuntu (15.04).

[1]: http://www.openldap.org/software/release/changes.html

** Affects: openldap (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Summary changed:

- [Utopic] OpenLDAP is outdated
+ [Utopic] OpenLDAP version is outdated

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1395098

Title:
  [Utopic] OpenLDAP version is outdated

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1395098/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1316124] Re: Actual Ubuntu Slapd totaly useless for serious use

2014-05-05 Thread Peter Matulis
Please add Debian backport bug

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316124

Title:
  Actual Ubuntu Slapd totaly useless for serious use

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1316124/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1316124] Re: Actual Ubuntu Slapd totaly useless for serious use

2014-05-05 Thread Peter Matulis
Once Utopic syncs with the new Debian version I think the best option is
to make a request via the Ubuntu Backports Project (-backports).

** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Medium

** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316124

Title:
  Actual Ubuntu Slapd totaly useless for serious use

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1316124/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1312156] [NEW] [Precise] Potential for data corruption

2014-04-24 Thread Peter Matulis
Public bug reported:

Under certain conditions there is faulty logic in function
tengine_stonith_notify() which can incorrectly add successfully fenced
nodes to a list, causing Pacemaker to subsequently erase that node’s
status section when the next DC (Designated Controller) election occurs.
With the status section erased, the cluster considers that node is down
and starts corresponding services on other nodes.  Multiple instances of
the same service can cause data corruption.

Conditions:

1. fenced node must have been the previous DC and been sufficiently functional 
to request its own fencing
2. fencing notification must arrive after the new DC has been elected but 
before it invokes the policy engine

Pacemaker versions affected:

1.1.6 - 1.1.9

Stable Ubuntu releases affected:

Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
Ubuntu 12.10 (EOL?)

Fix:

https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/commit/f30e1e43

References:

https://www.mail-archive.com/pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org/msg19509.html
http://blog.clusterlabs.org/blog/2014/potential-for-data-corruption-in-pacemaker-1-dot-1-6-through-1-dot-1-9/

** Affects: pacemaker (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: precise quantal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to pacemaker in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1312156

Title:
  [Precise] Potential for data corruption

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pacemaker/+bug/1312156/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 863741] Re: apt doesn't want to replace portmap with rpcbind on upgrade

2014-03-21 Thread Peter Matulis
I redid the test (install, upgrade) and simply asked to install nfs-
kernel-server.  It worked (?).  See attachment.

** Attachment added: nfs_upgrade.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/863741/+attachment/4035668/+files/nfs_upgrade.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to rpcbind in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863741

Title:
  apt doesn't want to replace portmap with rpcbind on upgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/863741/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 863741] Re: apt doesn't want to replace portmap with rpcbind on upgrade

2014-03-21 Thread Peter Matulis
Here are the APT logs.

** Attachment added: apt_logs.tar.gz
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/863741/+attachment/4035684/+files/apt_logs.tar.gz

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to rpcbind in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863741

Title:
  apt doesn't want to replace portmap with rpcbind on upgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/863741/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 863741] Re: apt doesn't want to replace portmap with rpcbind on upgrade

2014-03-21 Thread Peter Matulis
Clarification.  I logs I uploaded are:

/var/log/dist-upgrade/{apt.log,main.log}

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to rpcbind in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863741

Title:
  apt doesn't want to replace portmap with rpcbind on upgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/863741/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 863741] Re: apt doesn't want to replace portmap with rpcbind on upgrade

2014-03-20 Thread Peter Matulis
I just observed this after a Lucid:Precise upgrade.  It was a fresh
Lucid install and all that was done was a simple NFS server share export
and then do-release-upgrade.

My workaround was purging nfs-common and nfs-kernel-server and then
reinstalling them.  Results:

The following extra packages will be installed:
  libtirpc1 rpcbind
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  portmap
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  libtirpc1 nfs-common nfs-kernel-server rpcbind

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to rpcbind in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863741

Title:
  apt doesn't want to replace portmap with rpcbind on upgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/863741/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1245921] Re: postinstaller expects slapd.d to be a directory

2013-10-29 Thread Peter Matulis
Probably an apparmor thing.

/etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.slapd

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1245921

Title:
  postinstaller expects slapd.d to be a directory

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1245921/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1211876] Re: keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison

2013-10-15 Thread Peter Matulis
Confirmed.  Once the henrix kernel [1] is installed the new keepalived
on Raring works.

$ apt-cache policy keepalived
keepalived:
  Installed: 1:1.2.2-3ubuntu2.13.04.1
  Candidate: 1:1.2.2-3ubuntu2.13.04.1
  Version table:
 *** 1:1.2.2-3ubuntu2.13.04.1 0
500 http://nova.clouds.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ raring-proposed/main 
amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 1:1.2.2-3ubuntu2 0
500 http://nova.clouds.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ raring/main amd64 
Packages

[1]: http://people.canonical.com/~henrix/lp1238494/

** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done-raring

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keepalived in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1211876

Title:
  keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keepalived/+bug/1211876/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1211876] Re: keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison

2013-10-15 Thread Peter Matulis
Let me clarify.  Once the henrix kernel is installed, the normal and
proposed keepalived can be installed and tested.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keepalived in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1211876

Title:
  keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keepalived/+bug/1211876/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1211876] Re: keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison

2013-10-11 Thread Peter Matulis
On a KVM guest the freeze happens upon starting the normal (non-
proposed) keepalived.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keepalived in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1211876

Title:
  keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keepalived/+bug/1211876/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1211876] Re: keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison

2013-10-04 Thread Peter Matulis
There is something seriously wrong with the Raring package.  Starting
keepalived caused my system to lock up.  The same happened after trying
it on a few different platforms.  My last attempt was with a traditional
KVM guest.  After the freeze I reset the guest and I was able to capture
a screenshot of a kernel panic.

** Attachment added: keepalived_raring.png
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keepalived/+bug/1211876/+attachment/3859403/+files/keepalived_raring.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keepalived in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1211876

Title:
  keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keepalived/+bug/1211876/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1211876] Re: keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison

2013-10-04 Thread Peter Matulis
Hm, I tried again and it installed ok.  I need more time to verify this.
Don't know what's going on.

$ apt-cache policy keepalived   

keepalived:
  Installed: 1:1.2.2-3ubuntu2.13.04.1
  Candidate: 1:1.2.2-3ubuntu2.13.04.1
  Version table:
 *** 1:1.2.2-3ubuntu2.13.04.1 0
500 http://nova.clouds.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ raring-proposed/main 
amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 1:1.2.2-3ubuntu2 0
500 http://nova.clouds.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ raring/main amd64 
Packages

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keepalived in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1211876

Title:
  keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keepalived/+bug/1211876/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1211876] Re: keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison

2013-10-03 Thread Peter Matulis
Obviously, the above verification was done for Precise.  I will soon do
the same for Quantal and Raring.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keepalived in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1211876

Title:
  keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keepalived/+bug/1211876/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1211876] Re: keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison

2013-10-03 Thread Peter Matulis
I redid both tests (description) and re-confirmed both failures.  I then
installed the -proposed version below and re-did the tests.  They both
passed.

$ apt-cache policy keepalived
keepalived:
  Installed: 1:1.2.2-3ubuntu1.1
  Candidate: 1:1.2.2-3ubuntu1.1
  Version table:
 *** 1:1.2.2-3ubuntu1.1 0
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-proposed/main amd64 
Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 1:1.2.2-3ubuntu1 0
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages

** Tags added: verification-done-precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keepalived in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1211876

Title:
  keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keepalived/+bug/1211876/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1211876] Re: keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison

2013-10-03 Thread Peter Matulis
Ditto for Quantal - all good.

$ sudo apt-cache policy keepalived
keepalived:
  Installed: 1:1.2.2-3ubuntu2.12.10.1
  Candidate: 1:1.2.2-3ubuntu2.12.10.1
  Version table:
 *** 1:1.2.2-3ubuntu2.12.10.1 0
500 http://nova.clouds.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ quantal-proposed/main 
amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 1:1.2.2-3ubuntu2 0
500 http://nova.clouds.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ quantal/main amd64 
Packages

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keepalived in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1211876

Title:
  keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keepalived/+bug/1211876/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1211876] Re: keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison

2013-10-03 Thread Peter Matulis
** Tags added: verification-done-quantal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keepalived in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1211876

Title:
  keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keepalived/+bug/1211876/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1211876] Re: keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison

2013-09-27 Thread Peter Matulis
** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  There are at least 2 identified problems with keepalived on Precise when 
trying to reload the configuration (/etc/keepalived/keepalived.conf):
  
  (a) The removal of a server from the cluster does not work when the port
  of that server is in use by another member server
  
  (b) The change of weight of a cluster member does not work
  
  Reload is done by either:
  
  1. sudo service keepalived reload
  2. sudo kill -HUP `pidof keepalived`
  
  The upstream devel list suggests that issue (a) [1] has been resolved in
  version 1.2.3 which is currently only in Debian unstable via version
  1.2.7.  I can't find the actual bug supposedly filed by 'Ronie Gilberto
  Henrich'.  I have not tested 1.2.7 as it is not easily available to me.
  
  The pertinent entry for (a) in the upstream changelog [2] I believe is
  here:
  
  {{{ * check : Fix IPv4 address comparison routine. }}}
  
  This bug is a request to have fixes for both issues ([3] for (a))
  introduced into Ubuntu 12.04.
  
  [1]: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.keepalived.devel/3708
  [2]: http://www.keepalived.org/changelog.html
  [3]: 
https://github.com/acassen/keepalived/commit/e7931c851ecd359379c6bbc5b39287e36cbfbf25
  
  [Test Case]
+ 
+ 4A. Steps to reproduce issue #1:
+ 
  (a) Stop keepalived
  
  $ sudo service keepalived stop
  
  (b) Begin with a simple configuration file (attached: keepalived.conf)
  
  $ cat keepalived.conf | sudo tee /etc/keepalived/keepalived.conf
  $ sudo service keepalived start
  $ sudo ipvsadm -Ln
  
  IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096)
  Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
-   - RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
+   - RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
  TCP 192.168.0.100:80 wrr
-   - 192.168.1.101:8080 Masq 1 0 0
-   - 192.168.1.102:8080 Masq 1 0 0
+   - 192.168.1.101:8080 Masq 1 0 0
+   - 192.168.1.102:8080 Masq 1 0 0
  
  (c) Add a stanza to the configuration file (a server with a port that is
  in use by another server)
  
  --
- real_server 192.168.1.103 8080 {
- weight 1
- inhibit_on_failure
- }
+ real_server 192.168.1.103 8080 {
+ weight 1
+ inhibit_on_failure
+ }
  --
  
  (d) Reload the configuration
  
  $ sudo service keepalived reload
  $ sudo ipvsadm -Ln
  
  --
  IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096)
  Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
-   - RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
+   - RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
  TCP 192.168.0.100:80 wrr
-   - 192.168.1.101:8080 Masq 1 0 0
-   - 192.168.1.102:8080 Masq 1 0 0
-   - 192.168.1.103:8080 Masq 1 0 0
+   - 192.168.1.101:8080 Masq 1 0 0
+   - 192.168.1.102:8080 Masq 1 0 0
+   - 192.168.1.103:8080 Masq 1 0 0
  --
  
  (e) Remove the .103 stanza
  (f) Perform step (d) above
  
  --
  IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096)
  Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
-   - RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
+   - RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
  TCP 192.168.0.100:80 wrr
-   - 192.168.1.101:8080 Masq 1 0 0
-   - 192.168.1.102:8080 Masq 1 0 0
-   - 192.168.1.103:8080 Masq 1 0 0
+   - 192.168.1.101:8080 Masq 1 0 0
+   - 192.168.1.102:8080 Masq 1 0 0
+   - 192.168.1.103:8080 Masq 1 0 0
  --
  
  Note the .103 server remains.
  
- 4B. Steps to Reproduce issue #2:
+ 4B. Steps to reproduce issue #2:
  
  (a) Perform steps (a) and (b) from 4A
  (b) Edit a stanza in the configuration file (change weight from '1' to '0' in 
the .102 server)
  
  --
- real_server 192.168.1.102 8080 {
- weight 0
- inhibit_on_failure
- }
+ real_server 192.168.1.102 8080 {
+ weight 0
+ inhibit_on_failure
+ }
  --
  
  (c) Perform step (d) from 4A
  
  --
  P Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096)
  Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
-   - RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
+   - RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
  TCP 192.168.0.100:80 wrr
-   - 192.168.1.101:8080 Masq 1 0 0
-   - 192.168.1.102:8080 Masq 1 0 0
+   - 192.168.1.101:8080 Masq 1 0 0
+   - 192.168.1.102:8080 Masq 1 0 0
  --
  
  Note the original weight of '1' for .102 server remains.
  
- 4C. Steps to Counterprove issue #1:
+ 4C. Steps to counterprove issue #1:
  
  (a) Perform steps (a) and (b) from 4A
  (b) Add a stanza to the configuration file (a server with a port that is not 
in use by another server)
  
  --
- real_server 192.168.1.103 8081 {
- weight 1
- inhibit_on_failure
- }
+ real_server 192.168.1.103 8081 {
+ weight 1
+ inhibit_on_failure
+ }
  --
  
  (c) Perform step (d) from 4A
  
  --
  IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096)
  Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
-   - 

[Bug 1211876] [NEW] [Precise] keepalived reload buggy

2013-08-13 Thread Peter Matulis
Public bug reported:

There are at least 2 identified problems with keepalived on Precise when
trying to reload the configuration (/etc/keepalived/keepalived.conf):

(a) The removal of a server from the cluster does not work when the port
of that server is in use by another member server

(b) The change of weight of a cluster member does not work

Reload is done by either:

1. sudo service keepalived reload
2. sudo kill -HUP `pidof keepalived`

The upstream devel list suggests that issue (a) [1] has been resolved in
version 1.2.3 which is currently only in Debian unstable via version
1.2.7.  I can't find the actual bug supposedly filed by 'Ronie Gilberto
Henrich'.  I have not tested 1.2.7 as it is not easily available to me.

The pertinent entry for (a) in the upstream changelog [2] I believe is
here:

{{{ * check : Fix IPv4 address comparison routine. }}}

This bug is a request to have fixes for both issues ([3] for (a))
introduced into Ubuntu 12.04.

[1]: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.keepalived.devel/3708
[2]: http://www.keepalived.org/changelog.html
[3]: 
https://github.com/acassen/keepalived/commit/e7931c851ecd359379c6bbc5b39287e36cbfbf25

** Affects: keepalived (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keepalived in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1211876

Title:
  [Precise] keepalived reload buggy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keepalived/+bug/1211876/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1028585] Re: Memory allocation problem with ipvsadm

2013-08-06 Thread Peter Matulis
@Ralf

1. Edit the real server without specifying the -m

ipvsadm -e -t 10.131.208.21.80 -r 192.168.0.5 -w 0 -m

But you did specify the -m ^^^

ipvsadm -e -t -t 10.131.208.21.80 -r 192.168.0.5 -w 0 -m
works.

-t -t ?

Really?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ipvsadm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1028585

Title:
  Memory allocation problem with ipvsadm

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipvsadm/+bug/1028585/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1028585] Re: Memory allocation problem with ipvsadm

2013-08-06 Thread Peter Matulis
Ah, I needed to specify the -m !

$ sudo ipvsadm -e -t 192.168.0.100:80 -r 192.168.1.103:8080 -m -w 0

This works.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ipvsadm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1028585

Title:
  Memory allocation problem with ipvsadm

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipvsadm/+bug/1028585/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1028585] Re: Memory allocation problem with ipvsadm

2013-08-06 Thread Peter Matulis
This is what I'm seeing:

$ sudo ipvsadm -Ln

IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096)
Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
  - RemoteAddress:Port   Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
TCP  192.168.0.100:80 wrr
  - 192.168.1.101:8080   Masq1  0  0 
  - 192.168.1.102:8080   Masq1  0  0 
  - 192.168.1.103:8080   Masq1  0  0 

$ sudo ipvsadm -e -t 192.168.0.100:80 -r 192.168.1.103:8080 -w 0
Memory allocation problem

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ipvsadm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1028585

Title:
  Memory allocation problem with ipvsadm

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipvsadm/+bug/1028585/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1068145] Re: Fix for CVE-2012-3867 (puppet) is too restrictive - TLS certificates now break

2013-08-01 Thread Peter Matulis
I see that the backport request for Precise, Quantal, and Raring has
been rejected.  Where do we stand with this bug?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to puppet in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1068145

Title:
  Fix for CVE-2012-3867 (puppet) is too restrictive - TLS certificates
  now break

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/puppet/+bug/1068145/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1182247] Re: check_ide_smart fails with i/o error

2013-07-30 Thread Peter Matulis
** Package changed: nagios-plugins (Ubuntu) = linux (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios-plugins in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1182247

Title:
  check_ide_smart fails with i/o error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1182247/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1182247] Re: check_ide_smart fails with i/o error

2013-07-29 Thread Peter Matulis
This appears to be a kernel problem.  The command works in Precise and
Quantal but not Raring.  I tested this on Precise using the HWE stack
[1].

$ sudo /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_ide_smart -n -d /dev/sda

OK - Operational (7/7 tests passed)

Output after changing to the Raring kernel:

CRITICAL - SMART_ENABLE: Input/output error
CRITICAL - SMART_CMD_ENABLE

[1]:
sudo apt-get install linux-image-generic-lts-quantal
sudo apt-get install linux-image-generic-lts-raring

** Changed in: nagios-plugins (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios-plugins in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1182247

Title:
  check_ide_smart fails with i/o error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/1182247/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1182247] Re: check_ide_smart fails with i/o error

2013-07-29 Thread Peter Matulis
I tried the mainline 3.8.1 kernel [1] on Precise and the command works.
This suggests that there is something in the Ubuntu-distributed kernel
that is causing the problem.

[1]: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.8.1-raring/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios-plugins in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1182247

Title:
  check_ide_smart fails with i/o error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/1182247/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 833994] Re: debian-installer does not support https when using with preseed files

2013-04-24 Thread Peter Matulis
Related:

wget-udeb should install to /usr/bin/wget instead of /usr/bin/wget.gnu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wget/+bug/1172101

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cobbler-enlist in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/833994

Title:
  debian-installer does not support https when using with preseed files

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cobbler-enlist/+bug/833994/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1057024] Re: kvm kernel module always loaded, without setting /dev/kvm permissions

2012-11-20 Thread Peter Matulis
I just upgraded a server from 11.10 to 12.04 and I got a gnome-keyring
error [1] when trying to start a guest.  There is some other bug about
it and strangely a workaround was to install the 'gnome-keyring'
package.  I did so in haste and the majority of the error remains, even
after upgrading qemu-kvm to proposed version:

$ sudo virsh start kvm-blah

error: Failed to start domain kvm-blah
error: internal error Process exited while reading console log output: char 
device redirected to /dev/pts/1
Could not access KVM kernel module: No such file or directory
failed to initialize KVM: No such file or directory
No accelerator found!

$ apt-cache policy qemu-kvm

qemu-kvm:
  Installed: 1.0+noroms-0ubuntu14.4
  Candidate: 1.0+noroms-0ubuntu14.4
  Version table:
 *** 1.0+noroms-0ubuntu14.4 0
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-proposed/main amd64 
Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 1.0+noroms-0ubuntu14.3 0
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main amd64 
Packages
 1.0+noroms-0ubuntu14.2 0
500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-security/main amd64 
Packages
 1.0+noroms-0ubuntu13 0
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages

==

[1]

p11-kit: couldn't load module: 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkcs11/gnome-keyring-pkcs11.so: 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkcs11/gnome-keyring-pkcs11.so: cannot open shared 
object file: No such file or directory
error: Failed to start domain kvm-misc3
error: internal error Process exited while reading console log output: char 
device redirected to /dev/pts/1
Could not access KVM kernel module: No such file or directory
failed to initialize KVM: No such file or directory
No accelerator found!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057024

Title:
  kvm kernel module always loaded, without setting /dev/kvm permissions

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu-kvm/+bug/1057024/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1057024] Re: kvm kernel module always loaded, without setting /dev/kvm permissions

2012-11-20 Thread Peter Matulis
After loading the module I was able to start my guest:

$ sudo modprobe kvm_intel

The main question is why this did not occur automatically after
rebooting (after I upgraded to the -proposed version of qemu-kvm)?

Note that everything worked very well on 11.10.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057024

Title:
  kvm kernel module always loaded, without setting /dev/kvm permissions

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu-kvm/+bug/1057024/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 516016] Re: [karmic] openvpn service starts before dhclient

2012-10-18 Thread Peter Matulis
I noticed the errant behaviour does not exist starting with Ubuntu
11.04.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openvpn in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/516016

Title:
  [karmic] openvpn service starts before dhclient

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvpn/+bug/516016/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1027219] [NEW] [Precise] Default install assumes MaaS

2012-07-20 Thread Peter Matulis
Public bug reported:

After installation of cobbler on 12.04 there is a MaaS-specific syslinux
configuration:

$ cat /var/lib/tftpboot/pxelinux.cfg/default


DEFAULT menu
PROMPT 0
MENU TITLE Ubuntu MAAS
TIMEOUT 200
TOTALTIMEOUT 6000
ONTIMEOUT local

LABEL local
MENU LABEL (local)
MENU DEFAULT
LOCALBOOT -1


MENU end



This is strange.

** Affects: cobbler (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Assignee: Andres Rodriguez (andreserl)
 Status: New

** Changed in: cobbler (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Andres Rodriguez (andreserl)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cobbler in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1027219

Title:
  [Precise] Default install assumes MaaS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cobbler/+bug/1027219/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 496922] Re: Ubuntu snmpd package doesn't include all net-snmpd modules

2012-05-04 Thread Peter Matulis
Changed to 'Confirmed'.  Several users report that Lucid remains
affected.

** Changed in: net-snmp (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Released = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to net-snmp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496922

Title:
  Ubuntu snmpd package doesn't include all net-snmpd modules

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/net-snmp/+bug/496922/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 903901] Re: [Lucid] backport fix for ITS#6458

2012-02-13 Thread Peter Matulis
Verified on my side.  Thanks.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903901

Title:
  [Lucid] backport fix for ITS#6458

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/903901/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 903901] Re: [Lucid] backport fix for ITS#6458

2012-01-11 Thread Peter Matulis
No news yet.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903901

Title:
  [Lucid] backport fix for ITS#6458

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/903901/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 839390] Re: Apache+Kerberos not working anymore since update today

2011-12-21 Thread Peter Matulis
@Michael

You mentioned SSL.  How does that fit in here?

You can add bug data from an afflicted, internet-connected, system by
running this:

$ apport-collect 839390

Otherwise, there are ways to save bug data to file, transfer it to
another machine, and then upload it to this bug.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/839390

Title:
  Apache+Kerberos not working anymore since update today

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/839390/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 903901] Re: [Lucid] backport fix for ITS#6458

2011-12-15 Thread Peter Matulis
@Robie

All done.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903901

Title:
  [Lucid] backport fix for ITS#6458

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/903901/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 903901] Re: [Lucid] backport fix for ITS#6458

2011-12-15 Thread Peter Matulis
** Description changed:

  The problem:
  
  Replication fails if an attribute of a multi-value attribute entry is
  removed if the attribute does not have a equality matching rule defined
  in the schema.
  
  The problem can be mitigated temporarily by a doing a full re-sync by
  removing the affected database and restarting the service to trigger a
  full sync.
  
  This is fixed upstream beginning with the slapd 2.4.25 branch:
  
  openldap-2.4.25/CHANGES: Fixed slapd syncrepl for attributes with no
  matching rule (ITS#6458)
  
  For Ubuntu, this translates to the fix appearing in Oneiric:
  
  slapd | 2.4.21-0ubuntu5.6 | lucid-updates
  slapd | 2.4.23-6ubuntu6.1 | natty-updates
  slapd | 2.4.25-1.1ubuntu4 | oneiric-updates
  
  I am requesting the fix be backported at least to Lucid.
  
  Upstream bug:
  
  
http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/Software%20Bugs?id=6458;selectid=6458;usearchives=1
  
  SRU Justification:
  
- [Impact]: TBC
+ [Impact]: Serious. Replication, when used, is there for important reasons. It 
should not break due to a schema, even if poorly designed.
  [Development Fix]: Fixed in an upstream release and thus already present 
since Oneiric
  [Stable Fix]: lucid-proposed.debdiff, attached - patches taken from upstream 
git repository
- [Test Case]: TBC
+ [Test Case]: Attached as test_case.txt (from upstream bug; for consistency)
  [Regression Potential]: looks to be minimal from looking at the patch. There 
appears to be a comprehensive test suite that continues to pass with this patch 
applied.

** Attachment added: SRU test case
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/903901/+attachment/2634586/+files/test_case.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903901

Title:
  [Lucid] backport fix for ITS#6458

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/903901/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 903901] [NEW] [Lucid] backport fix for ITS#6458

2011-12-13 Thread Peter Matulis
Public bug reported:

The problem:

Replication fails if an attribute of a multi-value attribute entry is
removed if the attribute does not have a equality matching rule defined
in the schema.

The problem can be mitigated temporarily by a doing a full re-sync by
removing the affected database and restarting the service to trigger a
full sync.

This is fixed upstream beginning with the slapd 2.4.25 branch:

openldap-2.4.25/CHANGES: Fixed slapd syncrepl for attributes with no
matching rule (ITS#6458)

For Ubuntu, this translates to the fix appearing in Oneiric:

slapd | 2.4.21-0ubuntu5.6 | lucid-updates
slapd | 2.4.23-6ubuntu6.1 | natty-updates
slapd | 2.4.25-1.1ubuntu4 | oneiric-updates

I am requesting the fix be backported at least to Lucid.

Upstream bug:

http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/Software%20Bugs?id=6458;selectid=6458;usearchives=1

** Affects: openldap (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903901

Title:
  [Lucid] backport fix for ITS#6458

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/903901/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 872437] Re: the slapd-config database should not be under /etc

2011-11-30 Thread Peter Matulis
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 667597 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/667597

** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = New

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 667597
   conf.d directory not a configuration directory

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872437

Title:
  the slapd-config database should not be under /etc

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/872437/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 516016] Re: [karmic] openvpn service starts before dhclient

2011-11-18 Thread Peter Matulis
Sure, use /etc/rc.local.

service openvpn restart

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openvpn in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/516016

Title:
  [karmic] openvpn service starts before dhclient

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvpn/+bug/516016/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 507728] Re: man page missing for slapo-nssov

2011-11-06 Thread Peter Matulis
I'm attaching the man page for the nssov overlay from the upstream
2.4.25 branch, which is what Precise will use.

** Attachment added: slapo-nssov.5
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/507728/+attachment/2587902/+files/slapo-nssov.5

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507728

Title:
  man page missing for slapo-nssov

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/507728/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 872437] Re: the slapd-config database should not be under /etc

2011-10-13 Thread Peter Matulis
@Serge

Done!

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #645192
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=645192

** Also affects: openldap (Debian) via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=645192
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872437

Title:
  the slapd-config database should not be under /etc

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/872437/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 872437] [NEW] the slapd-config database should not be under /etc

2011-10-11 Thread Peter Matulis
Public bug reported:

The live slapd-config database currently reside under /etc/ldap/slapd.d .  Can 
we change it to something like /var/lib/slapd ?
Although it *does* consist of configuration material it is also a live database 
that people always think they can hand-edit due to it being under /etc.

** Affects: openldap (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872437

Title:
  the slapd-config database should not be under /etc

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/872437/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 507728] Re: man page missing for slapo-nssov

2011-10-02 Thread Peter Matulis
This is still the case for Ubuntu 11.10 beta2.

** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507728

Title:
  man page missing for slapo-nssov

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/507728/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 833818] [NEW] default DIT suffix should be definable by user (debconf/preseed)

2011-08-25 Thread Peter Matulis
Public bug reported:

After much complaining (bug #442498) the slapd package in Natty now sets
up a default DIT out of the box.  However, the change is a little
braindead as it sets up the suffix based on the localdomain of the
localhost.  I realize the change came in from Debian but I'm sure we can
do better than this.  Please allow the user to decide (debconf/preseed)
what suffix to use for their database!

** Affects: openldap (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/833818

Title:
  default DIT suffix should be definable by user (debconf/preseed)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/833818/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 658023] Re: registration token computed incorrectly

2011-04-08 Thread Peter Matulis
This bug is present in Ubuntu 10.10 and is fixed by

eucalyptus_2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4.2+lp658023

in the following PPA:

https://launchpad.net/~davewalker/+archive/uec-testing

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658023

Title:
  registration token computed incorrectly

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 423252] Re: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd

2011-03-27 Thread Peter Matulis
I also tested a patched libgcrypt11 package according to comment #73.  I
can now su from a local user to a non-local user and have a non-local
user use sudo (sudo-ldap).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libnss-ldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423252

Title:
  NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2
  suexec, and atd

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 423252] Re: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd

2011-03-23 Thread Peter Matulis
Building the openldap source with openssl instead of gnutls libraries
and installing the resulting libldap package works here.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libnss-ldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423252

Title:
  NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2
  suexec, and atd

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 423252] Re: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd

2011-03-23 Thread Peter Matulis
Yeah it was more as confirmation.  I'm going to test a patched libgcrypt
(comment #73) next.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libnss-ldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423252

Title:
  NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2
  suexec, and atd

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 682865] Re: memory leak in vsftpd

2011-02-16 Thread Peter Matulis
May be related:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/720095

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vsftpd in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682865

Title:
  memory leak in vsftpd

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 702903] Re: package tftpd-hpa 5.0-11ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: Pakiet jest w złym stanie - powinien zostać przeinstalowany przed usunięciem.

2011-01-14 Thread Peter Matulis
I cannot reproduce this.

I translated the error message to this:

The package is in poor condition - it should be reinstalled before
removal

How I knew the original was in Polish is beyond me.

$ sudo aptitude install tftpd-hpa=5.0-11ubuntu2

$ sudo aptitude full-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
Reading extended state information  
Initializing package states... Done
The following packages will be upgraded:
  tftpd-hpa 
1 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 46.9kB of archives. After unpacking 0B will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?] y
Writing extended state information... Done
Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/main tftpd-hpa 
5.0-11ubuntu2.1 [46.9kB]
Fetched 46.9kB in 0s (106kB/s)
Preconfiguring packages ...
(Reading database ... 27344 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace tftpd-hpa 5.0-11ubuntu2 (using 
.../tftpd-hpa_5.0-11ubuntu2.1_amd64.deb) ...
tftpd-hpa stop/waiting
Unpacking replacement tftpd-hpa ...
Processing triggers for man-db ...
Processing triggers for ureadahead ...
Setting up tftpd-hpa (5.0-11ubuntu2.1) ...
tftpd user (tftp) already exists, doing nothing.

tftpd-hpa directory (/var/lib/tftpboot) already exists, doing nothing.
tftpd-hpa start/running, process 11999

Reading package lists... Done 
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
Reading extended state information  
Initializing package states... Done

Current status: 0 updates [-1].

$ dpkg -l tftpd-hpa
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Cfg-files/Unpacked/Failed-cfg/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name  Version   
Description
+++-=-=-==
ii  tftpd-hpa 5.0-11ubuntu2.1   HPA's 
tftp server

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to tftp-hpa in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/702903

Title:
  package tftpd-hpa 5.0-11ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: Pakiet jest
  w złym stanie - powinien zostać przeinstalowany  przed usunięciem.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 692647] Re: Network bridge does not come up upon boot

2010-12-27 Thread Peter Matulis
It appears the lag of a few seconds is enough to prevent other network-
required services from starting.  I have tried with openvpn and
dhcp3-server.  So I need to resort to the same rc.local [1] I had when
the bridge wasn't coming up at all pre-Lucid.  I have tested this on
Maverick only.

[1]:

ifconfig eth0 up
brctl addbr br0
brctl addif br0 eth0
ifconfig br0 up
ip address add 10.153.107.61/24 brd + dev br0
ip route add default via 10.153.107.1 

service openvpn restart

** Changed in: bridge-utils (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = New

** Summary changed:

- Network bridge does not come up upon boot
+ Network bridge too slow to come up upon boot - affecting other services

** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: bridge-utils
  
- On a fresh (vmbuilder) install of Maverick (server 64-bit) I cannot get
- a vanilla bridge to come up upon boot using the standard configuration
- method (via /etc/network/interfaces [1]). A manual restart of the
- networking service gets it to work:
- 
- $ sudo /etc/init.d/networking restart
- 
- I have resorted to putting the above command in /etc/rc.local and that
- works for now.  I would, however, also need to start any network-
- required services there as well.
- 
- I mentioned this issue in bug #687631 but this is a more basic issue and
- it requires a bug of it's own.
+ On a fresh (vmbuilder) install of Maverick (server 64-bit) a vanilla
+ bridge does come up upon boot using the standard configuration method
+ (via /etc/network/interfaces [1]) but it takes too long and this delay
+ prevents other network services from starting.  I have resorted to
+ putting commands in /etc/rc.local and that works for now.
  
  [1]
  
  auto lo
  iface lo inet loopback
  
  auto eth0
  iface eth0 inet manual
  
  auto br0
  iface br0 inet static
- bridge_ports eth0
- address 10.153.107.93
- netmask 255.255.255.0
- network 10.153.107.0
- broadcast 10.153.107.255
- gateway 10.153.107.1
- --- 
+ bridge_ports eth0
+ address 10.153.107.93
+ netmask 255.255.255.0
+ network 10.153.107.0
+ broadcast 10.153.107.255
+ gateway 10.153.107.1
+ ---
  Architecture: amd64
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
  EcryptfsInUse: Yes
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100427.1)
  Package: bridge-utils 1.4-5ubuntu2
  PackageArchitecture: amd64
  ProcEnviron:
-  SHELL=/bin/zsh
-  PATH=(custom, user)
-  LANG=en_US.utf8
+  SHELL=/bin/zsh
+  PATH=(custom, user)
+  LANG=en_US.utf8
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-23.41-generic 2.6.35.7
  Tags: maverick
  Uname: Linux 2.6.35-23-generic x86_64
  UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout libvirtd lpadmin netdev plugdev sambashare

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bridge-utils in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692647

Title:
  Network bridge too slow to come up upon boot - affecting other services

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 692647] [NEW] Network bridge does not come up upon boot

2010-12-20 Thread Peter Matulis
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: bridge-utils

On a fresh (vmbuilder) install of Maverick (server 64-bit) I cannot get
a vanilla bridge to come up upon boot using the standard configuration
method (via /etc/network/interfaces [1]). A manual restart of the
networking service gets it to work:

$ sudo /etc/init.d/networking restart

I have resorted to putting the above command in /etc/rc.local and that
works for now.  I would, however, also need to start any network-
required services there as well.

I mentioned this issue in bug #687631 but this is a more basic issue and
it requires a bug of it's own.

[1]

auto lo
iface lo inet loopback

auto eth0
iface eth0 inet manual

auto br0
iface br0 inet static
bridge_ports eth0
address 10.153.107.93
netmask 255.255.255.0
network 10.153.107.0
broadcast 10.153.107.255
gateway 10.153.107.1

** Affects: bridge-utils (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bridge-utils in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692647

Title:
  Network bridge does not come up upon boot

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 692647] Re: Network bridge does not come up upon boot

2010-12-20 Thread Peter Matulis
Weird.  Either there was a recent update or there was a wicked delay for
the bridge to come up because it's working now (with a delay of around 5
seconds).  I will try it again soon on my similarly plagued Karmic
machine.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bridge-utils in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692647

Title:
  Network bridge does not come up upon boot

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 690138] Re: tomcat6 installation failure on Ubuntu 10.10

2010-12-14 Thread Peter Matulis
I tried to confirm but everything went well.  From my logs:

-
Setting up tomcat6 (6.0.28-2ubuntu1) ...

Creating config file /etc/default/tomcat6 with new version
Adding system user `tomcat6' (UID 105) ...
Adding new user `tomcat6' (UID 105) with group `tomcat6' ...
Not creating home directory `/usr/share/tomcat6'.
 * Starting Tomcat servlet engine tomcat6   [ OK ]
-

Strange.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/690138

Title:
  tomcat6 installation failure on Ubuntu 10.10

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 690138] Re: tomcat6 installation failure on Ubuntu 10.10

2010-12-14 Thread Peter Matulis
You seem to be running Lucid.  Huh?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/690138

Title:
  tomcat6 installation failure on Ubuntu 10.10

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 690138] Re: tomcat6 installation failure on Ubuntu 10.10

2010-12-14 Thread Peter Matulis
** Changed in: tomcat6 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/690138

Title:
  tomcat6 installation failure on Ubuntu 10.10

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 687631] Re: bridge is configured too late (for openvpn and openntpd at least)

2010-12-14 Thread Peter Matulis
On a fresh (vmbuilder) install Maverick (server 64-bit) I can't even get
a vanilla bridge to come up via /etc/network/interfaces [1].  A manual
restart of the networking service gets it to work however:

$ sudo /etc/init.d/networking restart

Should I open a new bug or should we change focus of the current one?

[1]

auto lo
iface lo inet loopback

auto eth0
iface eth0 inet manual

auto br0
iface br0 inet static
bridge_ports eth0
address 10.153.107.93
netmask 255.255.255.0 
network 10.153.107.0
broadcast 10.153.107.255
gateway 10.153.107.1

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bridge-utils in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/687631

Title:
  bridge is configured too late (for openvpn and openntpd at least)

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 676094] Re: Missing pid file check in tomcat6 init script causes failed startup

2010-11-16 Thread Peter Matulis
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 632554 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632554

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 632554
   tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already running.
 * You can subscribe to bug 632554 by following this link: 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat6/+bug/632554/+subscribe

-- 
Missing pid file check in tomcat6 init script causes failed startup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/676094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 563216] Re: Openssh5.1p1 sftp file control

2010-10-08 Thread Peter Matulis
I don't see any mention of umask in the sshd_config man page after
installing 10.10 RC.

-- 
Openssh5.1p1 sftp file control
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563216
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 563216] Re: Openssh5.1p1 sftp file control

2010-10-08 Thread Peter Matulis
OK, it's in the sftp-server man page.

-- 
Openssh5.1p1 sftp file control
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563216
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 564920] Re: PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit

2010-07-29 Thread Peter Matulis
I tested this and confirmed that the entire test ISO was properly
downloaded.

-- 
PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564920
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 564920] Re: PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit

2010-07-07 Thread Peter Matulis
@R. Jones

Go to

https://launchpad.net/~zulcss/+archive/ppa

and follow instructions under Adding this PPA to your system.

Install

php5 5.3.2-1ubuntu4.3

I tested this myself and the results were unsatisfactory (Apache error
after about 10% download of the test ISO file).  Can you confirm the
same?

-- 
PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564920
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 564920] Re: PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit

2010-06-17 Thread Peter Matulis
This turned out to be a duplicate of

http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=44522

Submitted: 2008-03-24 18:21 UTC

** Bug watch added: bugs.php.net/ #44522
   http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=44522

-- 
PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564920
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 564920] Re: PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit

2010-06-17 Thread Peter Matulis
Yes, we are doing just that.

-- 
PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564920
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 564920] Re: PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit

2010-06-16 Thread Peter Matulis
I sent this bug upstream.

http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=52102

** Bug watch added: bugs.php.net/ #52102
   http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=52102

-- 
PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564920
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 564920] Re: PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit

2010-06-11 Thread Peter Matulis
I have confirmed this.

A 64-bit Lucid Apache server hosting a file of size

4697126912 bytes

and a client (happens to be Lucid also) downloading the file via the
above test.php script only gets

402159616 bytes

** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564920
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 557300] Re: tomcat6 does not respect dpkg-statoverride settings

2010-04-23 Thread Peter Matulis
** Summary changed:

- tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user
+ tomcat6 does not respect dpkg-statoverride settings

-- 
tomcat6 does not respect dpkg-statoverride settings
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557300
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 557300] Re: tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user

2010-04-23 Thread Peter Matulis
** Summary changed:

- tomcat6 does not respect dpkg-statoverride settings
+ tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user

-- 
tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557300
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 557300] Re: tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user

2010-04-14 Thread Peter Matulis
Sorry about that.  Confirmed.

-- 
tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557300
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 503008] Re: Dovecot-auth doesn't close sockets

2010-03-06 Thread Peter Matulis
I may be able to build a package for you from the Intrepid sources.
This gives the following version which has provided me the parameter in
question:

dovecot-imapd 1:1.1.4-0ubuntu1.3

I'll test this on my side and let you know if it will work.

-- 
Dovecot-auth doesn't close sockets
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503008
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 503008] Re: Dovecot-auth doesn't close sockets

2010-03-03 Thread Peter Matulis
I've only managed to use this parameter with Ubuntu  8.04 .  Otherwise,
the error above is thrown.

-- 
Dovecot-auth doesn't close sockets
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503008
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 503008] Re: Dovecot-auth doesn't close sockets

2010-03-03 Thread Peter Matulis
Hmmm, the default shipped with 8.10 is

dovecot-imapd   1:1.1.4-0ubuntu1.3

but an updated 8.04 has

dovecot-imapd   1:1.2.9-1ubuntu3

Why does this parameter work with the older version?

And @Gaylord, why aren't you running the latest available with 8.04
anyway?

-- 
Dovecot-auth doesn't close sockets
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503008
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 503008] Re: Dovecot-auth doesn't close sockets

2010-03-03 Thread Peter Matulis
Strange.  I built a Hardy virtual machine and 1.2.9 was installed.
Indeed, the archives do say 1.0.10.  I'll have to determine what
happened with my VM.  At any rate, if the error is thrown then that
version doesn't support the parameter.

-- 
Dovecot-auth doesn't close sockets
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503008
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 516016] Re: [karmic] openvpn service starts before dhclient

2010-02-03 Thread Peter Matulis
I doubt it.

-- 
[karmic] openvpn service starts before dhclient
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/516016
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openvpn in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 516016] [NEW] [karmic] openvpn service starts before dhclient

2010-02-02 Thread Peter Matulis
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: openvpn

I have a server that was upgraded from 9.04 to 9.10.  I cannot say with
certainty what was happening during 9.04 but systematically when I
reboot the daemon does not come up:

$ sudo service openvpn status
[sudo] password for blah:
 * could not access PID file for VPN 'server'

$ sudo service openvpn start
 * Starting virtual private network daemon(s)...
 *   Autostarting VPN 'server'
   ...done.

 $ sudo service openvpn status
 * VPN 'server' is running

The server is currently being assigned an IP address (DHCP).  It looks
like that OpenVPN is coming up before that address is provided.  From
/var/log/syslog:

openvpn[815]: TCP/UDP: Socket bind failed on local address 11.153.118.61:1194: 
Cannot assign requested address
openvpn[815]: Exiting
kernel: [   13.380034] br0: port 1(eth0) entering forwarding state
dhclient: Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Client V3.1.2
dhclient: Copyright 2004-2008 Internet Systems Consortium.
dhclient: All rights reserved.
dhclient: For info, please visit http://www.isc.org/sw/dhcp/
dhclient: 
kernel: [   14.364042] eth0: no IPv6 routers present
kernel: [   14.428029] br0: no IPv6 routers present
dhclient: Listening on LPF/br0/54:52:00:5e:0a:26
dhclient: Sending on   LPF/br0/54:52:00:5e:0a:26
dhclient: Sending on   Socket/fallback
dhclient: DHCPDISCOVER on br0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 4
dhclient: DHCPOFFER of 11.153.118.61 from 11.153.118.1
dhclient: DHCPREQUEST of 11.153.108.61 on br0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67
dhclient: DHCPACK of 11.153.108.61 from 11.153.118.1
dhclient: bound to 11.153.108.61 -- renewal in 102522 seconds

** Affects: openvpn (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
[karmic] openvpn service starts before dhclient
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/516016
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openvpn in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 497258] Re: vmbuilder fails when adding package 'ubuntu-desktop'

2009-12-23 Thread Peter Matulis
I did add a sync to the following file

/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/VMBuilder/disk.py

Here

def umount(self):
self.vm.cancel_cleanup(self.umount)
if (self.type != TYPE_SWAP) and not self.dummy:
logging.debug('Syncing')
run_cmd('sync')
logging.debug('Unmounting %s', self.mntpath)
run_cmd('umount', self.mntpath)

But there is a umount happening before that function is called.

I ran vmbuilder in debug mode and here are the pertinent messages:

===
2009-12-23 09:18:43,386 DEBUG   : Reading package lists...
2009-12-23 09:18:43,386 DEBUG   : cleaning apt
2009-12-23 09:18:43,386 DEBUG   : ['chroot', 
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root', 'apt-get', 'clean']
2009-12-23 09:18:43,613 DEBUG   : Unmounting volatile lrm filesystems
2009-12-23 09:18:43,614 DEBUG   : Unbinding /dev and /proc filesystems
2009-12-23 09:24:43,714 DEBUG   : ['umount', 
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/dev/pts']
2009-12-23 09:24:43,718 DEBUG   : ['umount', 
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/dev']
2009-12-23 09:24:43,723 DEBUG   : ['umount', 
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/proc']
2009-12-23 09:24:43,727 INFO: umount: 
/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/proc: device is busy.
2009-12-23 09:24:43,728 INFO: (In some cases useful info about 
processes that use
2009-12-23 09:24:43,729 INFO:  the device is found by lsof(8) or 
fuser(1))
2009-12-23 09:24:43,729 DEBUG   : Oh, dear, an exception occurred
2009-12-23 09:24:43,729 INFO: Cleaning up
2009-12-23 09:24:43,729 DEBUG   : ['umount', 
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/proc']
2009-12-23 09:24:43,733 DEBUG   : umount: 
/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/proc: device is busy.
2009-12-23 09:24:43,734 DEBUG   : (In some cases useful info about 
processes that use
2009-12-23 09:24:43,734 DEBUG   :  the device is found by lsof(8) or 
fuser(1))
2009-12-23 09:24:43,734 DEBUG   : ['umount', 
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/dev/pts']
2009-12-23 09:24:43,739 DEBUG   : umount: 
/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/dev/pts: not mounted
2009-12-23 09:24:43,739 DEBUG   : ['umount', 
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/dev']
2009-12-23 09:24:43,744 DEBUG   : umount: 
/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/dev: not mounted
2009-12-23 09:24:43,744 DEBUG   : Syncing
2009-12-23 09:24:43,744 DEBUG   : ['sync']
2009-12-23 09:24:43,793 DEBUG   : Unmounting 
/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/target/
2009-12-23 09:24:43,794 DEBUG   : ['umount', 
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/target/']
2009-12-23 09:24:46,803 DEBUG   : ['kpartx', '-d', 
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/disk0.img']
2009-12-23 09:24:46,813 DEBUG   : loop deleted : /dev/loop2
2009-12-23 09:24:46,813 DEBUG   : ['kpartx', '-d', 
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/disk0.img']
2009-12-23 09:24:46,819 DEBUG   : ['rmdir', 'kvm-test-desktop3']
2009-12-23 09:24:46,822 DEBUG   : ['rm', '-rf', 
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM']
2009-12-23 09:24:46,885 INFO: rm: cannot remove 
`/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/proc/dri/0/vma': Operation not 
permitted
2009-12-23 09:24:46,886 INFO: rm: cannot remove 
`/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/proc/dri/0/bufs': Operation not 
permitted
.
.
.
===

So, as suggested, I did run lsof:

$ sudo lsof -R /home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/proc

COMMAND   PID  PPID USER   FD   TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF   NODE NAME
dd808 1 root0r   REG0,30 4026531987 /proc/kmsg
lsof21109 31948 root3r   DIR0,30  1 /proc
lsof21109 31948 root6r   DIR0,301176729 /proc/21109/fd

So dd (with init as parent) is to blame.

Then:

$ ps ax | grep -w dd
4 0   808 1  20   0   8192   604 syslog Ss   ?  0:00 dd bs=1 
if=/proc/kmsg of=/var/run/rsyslog/kmsg

Kernel messages appear to not have finished flushing to disk.

I decided to try a sleep in this file

/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/VMBuilder/plugins/ubuntu/dapper.py

Here

def unmount_dev_proc(self):
import time
time.sleep(360)
run_cmd('umount', '%s/dev/pts' % self.destdir)
run_cmd('umount', '%s/dev' % self.destdir)
run_cmd('umount', '%s/proc' % self.destdir)

But this did not help.

-- 
vmbuilder fails when adding package 'ubuntu-desktop'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497258
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vm-builder in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 497258] [NEW] vmbuilder fails when adding package 'ubuntu-desktop'

2009-12-15 Thread Peter Matulis
Public bug reported:

When using the line

--addpkg ubuntu-desktop

to the vmbuilder invocation unexpected messages appear near the end of
the process:

2009-12-15 20:57:38,007 INFO: Committed revision 2.^M
2009-12-15 20:57:40,097 INFO: umount: /tmp/vmbuilderS5ELLk/root/proc: 
device is busy.^M
2009-12-15 20:57:40,107 INFO: (In some cases useful info about 
processes that use^M
2009-12-15 20:57:40,107 INFO:  the device is found by lsof(8) or 
fuser(1))^M
2009-12-15 20:57:40,107 INFO: Cleaning up^M
2009-12-15 20:57:51,447 INFO: rm: cannot remove 
`/tmp/vmbuilderS5ELLk/root/proc/dri/0/vma': Operation not permitted^M
2009-12-15 20:57:51,447 INFO: rm: cannot remove 
`/tmp/vmbuilderS5ELLk/root/proc/dri/0/bufs': Operation not permitted^M
2009-12-15 20:57:51,447 INFO: rm: cannot remove 
`/tmp/vmbuilderS5ELLk/root/proc/dri/0/queues': Operation not permitted^M
2009-12-15 20:57:51,447 INFO: rm: cannot remove 
`/tmp/vmbuilderS5ELLk/root/proc/dri/0/clients': Operation not permitted

and so on.  A complete transcript is attached.

After removing the line the process finishes OK.

Host is:

Linux U910S64-A 2.6.31-16-server #53-Ubuntu SMP Tue Dec 8 05:08:02 UTC
2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux

** Affects: vm-builder (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
vmbuilder fails when adding package 'ubuntu-desktop'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497258
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vm-builder in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 497258] Re: vmbuilder fails when adding package 'ubuntu-desktop'

2009-12-15 Thread Peter Matulis

** Attachment added: transcript.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36854188/transcript.txt

-- 
vmbuilder fails when adding package 'ubuntu-desktop'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497258
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vm-builder in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 497258] Re: vmbuilder fails when adding package 'ubuntu-desktop'

2009-12-15 Thread Peter Matulis
Soory, transcript.txt is actually the shell script I used to do launch
vmbuilder.  The transcript is actually attached as typescript.txt (from
script command).

** Attachment added: typescript.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36854241/typescript.txt

-- 
vmbuilder fails when adding package 'ubuntu-desktop'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497258
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vm-builder in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 344400] Re: libvirtError: internal error unable to start guest

2009-09-30 Thread Peter Matulis
Is this bug only relevant to disk files?  I am booting guests fine with
raw disks, albeit LVM-based.

Details:

On a Jaunty KVM host I'm using LVM.  When creating a guest I allocated 2
logical volumes (4 GB and 80 GB) to it to be used as raw disks.  With
virt-manager I used the first one (/dev/vda) for installation (with LVM
again; so LVM over LVM) and afterwards added the second one (/dev/vdb).
I also set up LVM on the second disk and created a 40 GB logical volume.
The VM starts fine.

-- 
libvirtError: internal error unable to start guest
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344400
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 429443] [NEW] /usr/bin/kvm-ok should be disassociated from kvm

2009-09-14 Thread Peter Matulis
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: kvm

If we want to make the kvm-ok script really useful then it should be
disassociated from the kvm package.  Users should not have to install
kvm and its dependents in order to discover whether they can use kvm.  I
propose we move this script into the base Ubuntu install.

** Affects: kvm (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
/usr/bin/kvm-ok should be disassociated from kvm
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429443
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to kvm in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 306293] Re: Mod_ssl randomly causes apache threads to use 100% of CPU

2009-02-05 Thread Peter Matulis
Chuck, comment added to the corresponding private bug (306601).  In
short, this PPA appears to solve the problem.  I am recommending an SRU
for it.

-- 
Mod_ssl randomly causes apache threads to use 100% of CPU
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306293
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 280712] [NEW] Accessing printing properties for some drivers causes excessive load on CPU

2008-10-09 Thread Peter Matulis
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: samba

When accessing printing properties for some drivers (Xerox and HP
Designjet) the load on the CPU goes way up (90%).  There is a latency of
30 to 60 seconds during this time.  Other drivers (Ricoh) do not exhibit
this behaviour.

This has been observed on versions of Samba = 3.0.28 .

** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Accessing printing properties for some drivers causes excessive load on CPU
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/280712
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 192080] Re: shutdown fails.. nfs

2008-09-29 Thread Peter Matulis
Workaround:

In /etc/rc0.d change the symlink

K25open-iscsi

to

S80open-iscsi

Then try a shutdown test.

If successful, do something similar for /etc/rc6.d.

-- 
shutdown fails.. nfs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192080
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to open-iscsi in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs