[Bug 1049582] Re: radosgw crash on armhf architecture
I can't really reproduced, don't have a similar setup ready. However, analyzing the backtrace and the code, the following may fix the issue: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/2fddfb0a95288d39cee2e82376297ce43296743b It has already been pushed to the ceph stable branch, though it's not in any tagged version yet. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ceph in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1049582 Title: radosgw crash on armhf architecture To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1049582/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1017978] Re: [MIR] libfcgi, ceph (radosgw)
Note that while libapache2-mod-fastcgi is currently the better way to go, there's also libapache2-mod-fcgid, or nginx/lighttpd with fastcgi. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libfcgi in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017978 Title: [MIR] libfcgi, ceph (radosgw) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1017978/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1017978] Re: [MIR] libfcgi, ceph (radosgw)
At the time we went through the entire code base. It didn't make sense going just through the ceph code and not through the radosgw code, they reside on the same tree and share code. Also, the radosgw code size is not as big as it was implied at the time. In any case, we audited that code again, and it mostly looks ok (other than a single issue of not checking realloc, which was probably missed at the first time). A trivial fix for that is ready. All the other issues have been fixed. There are a few isolated cases of strcpy/sprintf that are being used. We went through all of them and verified that they are safe (size of source is known, destination has enough space allocated). We can change these, they're pretty trivial. though we're hesitant to add unnecessary changes, we don't want to break anything by mistake. All in all there are really a few affected call sites, and as I said, the code in question is really not that big. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libfcgi in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017978 Title: [MIR] libfcgi, ceph (radosgw) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1017978/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1017978] Re: [MIR] libfcgi, ceph (radosgw)
We fixed all the issues that were pointed out, and it was already ready for precise. At the time it was communicated that the main issue for not including radosgw was libfcgi, however, that doesn't appear to be an issue any more. We've also created a test suite for radosgw (github.com/ceph/s3-tests.git) that beyond functionality tests it also does fuzzing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libfcgi in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017978 Title: [MIR] libfcgi, ceph (radosgw) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1017978/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
