[Bug 46081] Re: cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs

2009-04-15 Thread Jan Kovacik
I have Interpid box with RTL8169 chipped gigabit NIC from REPOTEC. When
I am copying from samba share to XP machine transfer speed is about
38MB/s, but when I try to copy file TO samba share, the transfer speed
is fluctuating between 500 KB and 8 MB/s.

However, I am able to copy four files simultaeously from my XP machine
with Raid 0 disks and they are being pumped to samba in same speed,
higher than one file alone :) , stable about 9MB/s It is interesting bug
and also long lasting I see.

So there is no other option than buy another crappy NIC? - i googled a
whole world to find any solution, but I found nothing :(

-- 
cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46081
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 46081] Re: cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs

2009-04-03 Thread Thierry Carrez
Bob: your issue seems different: this bug is about bad performance in cifs 
compared to smbfs (and seems related to RTL81xx chips). Your bug is about a 
performance regression in CIFS from intrepid to Jaunty. Could you please file a 
separate bug so that it can be properly investigated ?
Thanks in advance.

-- 
cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46081
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 46081] Re: cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs

2009-03-29 Thread Bob Busters
ubuntu 9.04 beta 
nVidia Corporation MCP51 Ethernet Controller (rev a3)
im getting slow speeds over samba like 68kB/s.   it works ok in intrepid.

-- 
cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46081
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 46081] Re: cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs

2009-03-27 Thread Thierry Carrez
Really seems to be a realtek driver problem:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4889

Anyone with a RTL81xx chipset reproducing it in intrepid or jaunty ?

-- 
cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46081
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 46081] Re: cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs

2009-01-04 Thread Jean Roberto Souza
I was making one transfer now, from my Ubuntu 8.04 to my XP and noticed
the slow transfer. Here I am reading this bug and reporting that it
still exist. I'm looking for a solution but until now I only found bug
reports.

-- 
cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46081
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 46081] Re: cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs

2008-11-12 Thread Ben Hodgetts (Enverex)
Thought it may be worth adding, I'm using Gentoo with a Realtek Gigabit
onboard adapter and getting ~3MB/s throughput too (when transfering to a
Samba share).

-- 
cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46081
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 46081] Re: cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs

2008-08-29 Thread Huygens
I also had the experience yesterday. I was transfering a 6.5GB file (VM image) 
from my MacBook (using Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger) to my PC (using Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy 
Heron). I was using the wireless connection (54Mb/s rt61pci), so a theorical 
6.4MB/s.
Such a transfer should in theory take about 17 min. In real, I would expect 
somewhere between 20 to 30 min. However, it took more than 4 hours!! The speed 
was about 0.45MB/s!!! That's almost as slow as my internet connection!

Samba logs does not show anything wrong. Nothing was wrote in the
/var/log/messages file neither. I do not know where to start to give
more information on this particular bug.

-- 
cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46081
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs