[Bug 1043410] [NEW] nova-manage create flavor shouldn't require a flavorid
Public bug reported: It's possible to specify a flavorid using --flavor=... (which is a different thing than the auto-incremented id in the DB) when creating a flavor but I think it shouldn't be required. If nothing is specified it could be automatically generated. $ nova-manage flavor create --name=test --memory=512 --cpu=1 --root_gb=0 --ephemeral_gb=0 Possible wrong number of arguments supplied Creates instance types / flavors [...] TypeError: create() takes at least 7 arguments (6 given) Expected: $ nova-manage flavor create --name=test --memory=512 --cpu=1 --root_gb=0 --ephemeral_gb=0 [...] test created ** Affects: nova Importance: Undecided Assignee: Adrien Cunin (adri2000) Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1043410 Title: nova-manage create flavor shouldn't require a flavorid To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1043410/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1043410] Re: nova-manage create flavor shouldn't require a flavorid
(Sorry I filed this against ubuntu/nova instead of nova.) ** Package changed: nova (Ubuntu) => nova -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1043410 Title: nova-manage create flavor shouldn't require a flavorid To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1043410/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 978963] Re: add release note that OpenStack should be used on a protected network
Why do we keep horizon and keystone tasks? By the way, I think it's possible to mitigate this issue in Keystone using Apache. See http://adam.younglogic.com/2012/04/keystone-httpd/ to set it up and be able to use https:// for Keystone. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/978963 Title: add release note that OpenStack should be used on a protected network To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/978963/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 960350] Re: Cleanup Keystone package descriptions
** Also affects: python-keystoneclient (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: python-keystoneclient (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: python-keystoneclient (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/960350 Title: Cleanup Keystone package descriptions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keystone/+bug/960350/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 960350] Re: Cleanup Keystone package descriptions
** Changed in: keystone (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Adrien Cunin (adri2000) ** Changed in: python-keystoneclient (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Adrien Cunin (adri2000) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/960350 Title: Cleanup Keystone package descriptions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keystone/+bug/960350/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 942541] [NEW] Short descriptions mistakes
Public bug reported: nova-cert and nova-doc short descriptions should be fixed: * nova-cert: s/virtual machine scheduler/certificate management/ * nova-doc: s/documetation/documentation/ ** Affects: nova (Ubuntu) Importance: Low Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942541 Title: Short descriptions mistakes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/942541/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 934064] Re: Installing openstack-dashboard on Precise removes Keystone package
See #916773 for the explanation of why the conflict was added. Essex 4 shouldn't cause any more problem, so the packaging can be fixed. ** Also affects: python-keystoneclient (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: python-keystoneclient (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: python-keystoneclient (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: python-keystoneclient (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Chuck Short (zulcss) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/934064 Title: Installing openstack-dashboard on Precise removes Keystone package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/934064/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1247148] Re: rndc addzone isn't working. fix available
Can you reproduce this on saucy or trusty? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1247148 Title: rndc addzone isn't working. fix available To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1247148/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1242153] Re: package nova-common 1:2013.2~rc2-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1241803 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1241803 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1241803 During Distribution Upgrade could not install 'nova-common' -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1242153 Title: package nova-common 1:2013.2~rc2-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/1242153/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 222804] Re: [SRU] fail2ban fails to start after reboot
Chuck, According to https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+queue?queue_state=4&queue_text=fail2ban, your upload was rejected on 2008-09-03. Please sort it out and re-upload. If you cannot take care of that reasonably quickly (the sru process started more than 3 months ago!), please tell us so that someone else can do the work. Thanks. -- [SRU] fail2ban fails to start after reboot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222804 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 328874] [NEW] getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba I encountered this bug on a hardy domain controller using winbind to fetch user/group informations from another NT domain (the Samba domain trusts the NT domain). Calling getent group just crashes winbindd, as seen in the log attached. This is a bug known and fixed upstream [0] (in 3.2.6 and 3.3.0). Fixing jaunty is a matter of uploading the latest 3.2 version. Fixing hardy requires backporting the patch (I successfully tested it already). Actually the bug is not fixed in any maintenance release of 3.0, and I'm not sure it will ever be (as it seems to be EOL), but I got upstream to confirm the fix is appropriate for this branch as well [1] and commit it [2]. If someone is interested, we could also fix intrepid. I don't know about other releases. [0] https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5906 [1] http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2009-February/063155.html [2] http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=commit;h=db4a435d235bedf48d668a0f4418dd46f38044ed ** Affects: samba Importance: Unknown Status: Fix Released ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328874 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 328874] Re: getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller
** Attachment added: "winbindd-crash.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22567931/winbindd-crash.log ** Bug watch added: Samba Bugzilla #5906 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5906 ** Also affects: samba via https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5906 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328874 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 328874] Re: getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Hardy) Importance: Undecided => Medium Assignee: (unassigned) => Adrien Cunin (adri2000) Status: New => Confirmed -- getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328874 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 328874] Re: getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller
** Description changed: Binary package hint: samba I encountered this bug on a hardy domain controller using winbind to fetch user/group informations from another NT domain (the Samba domain trusts the NT domain). Calling getent group just crashes winbindd, as seen in the log attached. This is a bug known and fixed upstream [0] (in 3.2.6 and 3.3.0). - Fixing jaunty is a matter of uploading the latest 3.2 version. + Fixing jaunty is a matter of uploading the latest 3.2 version or 3.3. Fixing hardy requires backporting the patch (I successfully tested it already). Actually the bug is not fixed in any maintenance release of 3.0, and I'm not sure it will ever be (as it seems to be EOL), but I got upstream to confirm the fix is appropriate for this branch as well [1] and commit it [2]. If someone is interested, we could also fix intrepid. I don't know about other releases. [0] https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5906 [1] http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2009-February/063155.html [2] http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=commit;h=db4a435d235bedf48d668a0f4418dd46f38044ed -- getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328874 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 328874] Re: getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller
Steve, can you merge the latest version from unstable into jaunty before Thursday? ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Jaunty) Assignee: (unassigned) => Steve Langasek (vorlon) ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328874 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 328874] Re: getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller
Needs to be uploaded by ubuntu-main-sponsors and ACKed by ubuntu-sru, once the bug is fixed in jaunty. ** Attachment added: "hardy debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22706088/samba_3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.8.debdiff -- getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328874 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 328874] Re: getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller
Could the SRU Verification team take a look at this bug please? -- getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328874 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 328874] Re: getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller
Martin, I cannot test the packages in -proposed because I don't have anymore access to the domain controllers where I encountered the bug, but when I had such access, I built and tested my own packages including exactly the same patch with a successful result, and I know the domain controllers have been running using these packages without any problem since then. -- getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328874 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 328874] Re: getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller
What can be done in such a situation? Isn't the SRU Verification team supposed to test the packages? -- getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328874 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 328874] Re: getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller
Sorry to be repeating myself, but isn't the SRU Verification team supposed to do all these tests? Also, given that the patch comes from and is approved by upstream, given that it's really tiny, given that it's been in -proposed for more than 3 months with no negative feedback (nor positive, right), would it be possible to assume it's safe to move it to -updates? -- getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328874 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
