[Bug 988394] Re: Reboot hangs because /etc/rc6.d/S40umountfs chokes on non-existent mounts

2012-05-03 Thread Steve Langasek
I don't think this analysis is correct.  At the time the umountfs script
finishes, *all* filesystems are supposed to be unmounted.  This includes
any mount points watched by autofs.  So why is autofs still running at
this point in the shutdown?  The autofs daemon should be shut down
*prior* to /etc/rc6.d/S35networking, since at that point there's no
network left and autofs should no longer be trying to mount new
filesystems anyway!

And if I look at the autofs5 package, it has a wrong upstart job that
does 'stop on runlevel [!2345]', which does not properly serialize the
shutdown to ensure the service is stopped before we reach the unmounting
phase.  Thus there's a race between /etc/init/rc.conf and
/etc/init/autofs.conf.

Reassigning to the autofs5 package.

** Package changed: sysvinit (Ubuntu) => autofs5 (Ubuntu)

** Changed in: autofs5 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: autofs5 (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Canonical Foundations Team (canonical-foundations) => Canonical 
Server Team (canonical-server)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to autofs5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988394

Title:
  Reboot hangs because /etc/rc6.d/S40umountfs chokes on non-existent
  mounts

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs5/+bug/988394/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 994533] Re: cannot install ia32-libs on Ubuntu 12.04 x86_64

2012-05-04 Thread Steve Langasek
I can't reproduce this problem here.
Please show the output of the following command on your system:

dpkg-query -f='${PackageSpec}\t${Version}\n${Conffiles}\n' -W
'libldap-2.4-2:*'


** Package changed: ia32-libs (Ubuntu) => openldap (Ubuntu)

** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

** Tags added: multiarch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994533

Title:
  cannot install ia32-libs on Ubuntu 12.04 x86_64

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/994533/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 994533] Re: cannot install ia32-libs on Ubuntu 12.04 x86_64

2012-05-04 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 07:49:55PM -, Ulli Horlacher wrote:
> On Fri 2012-05-04 (19:22), Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I can't reproduce this problem here.

> I can reproduce it on 3 Ubuntu 12.04 systems.

> > Please show the output of the following command on your system:

> > dpkg-query -f='${PackageSpec}\t${Version}\n${Conffiles}\n' -W
> > 'libldap-2.4-2:*'

> root@eduroam1:~# dpkg-query -f='${PackageSpec}\t${Version}\n${Conffiles}\n' 
> -W 'libldap-2.4-2:*'
> libldap-2.4-2   2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4
>  /etc/ldap/ldap.conf 7fac807f65d84394410881bc16f1198a
> libldap-2.4-2:i386
> 
The correct output is:

libldap-2.4-2   2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4
 /etc/ldap/ldap.conf 0b3f4d19d88498314478273ce10b0a70
libldap-2.4-2:i386  

Somehow, you have a corrupted entry in your dpkg database for this
conffile.

Can you try running 'sudo apt-get install --reinstall libldap-2.4-2' to see
if that fixes the issue?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994533

Title:
  cannot install ia32-libs on Ubuntu 12.04 x86_64

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/994533/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 994533] Re: cannot install ia32-libs on Ubuntu 12.04 x86_64

2012-05-04 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 09:27:08PM -, Ulli Horlacher wrote:
> > Can you try running 'sudo apt-get install --reinstall libldap-2.4-2' to see
> > if that fixes the issue?

> root@eduroam1:~# apt-get install --reinstall libldap-2.4-2
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to correct these:
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>  libcurl3:i386 : Depends: libldap-2.4-2:i386 (>= 2.4.7) but it is not going 
> to be installed
> E: Unmet dependencies. Try 'apt-get -f install' with no packages (or specify 
> a solution).

Right; we need a slightly different command to get around the fact that
dependencies aren't satisfied.

Try one of these:

  apt-get install --reinstall libldap-2.4-2 libldap-2.4-2:i386

  dpkg -i
/var/cache/apt/archives/libldap-2.4-2_2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4_amd64.deb

Either one of those should get things back to a consistent state.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994533

Title:
  cannot install ia32-libs on Ubuntu 12.04 x86_64

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/994533/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 994533] Re: cannot install ia32-libs on Ubuntu 12.04 x86_64

2012-05-06 Thread Steve Langasek
> But how was this inconsistancy possible?
> Any idea, what I did wrong?

I don't think this is due to anything you did wrong; most likely, there
was simply a single-bit memory or disk error that broke the checksum of
your conffile.

> Could I found this solution by myself?

Not easily, and for that I reassign the bug to dpkg rather than just
closing it outright.  However, this is a low priority issue since it's
unlikely to affect many people who don't have failing hardware.

** Package changed: openldap (Ubuntu) => dpkg (Ubuntu)

** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Low

** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Triaged

** Summary changed:

- cannot install ia32-libs on Ubuntu 12.04 x86_64
+ difficult to recover a system when a conffile of a M-A: same package has a 
corrupted checksum

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994533

Title:
  difficult to recover a system when a conffile of a M-A: same package
  has a corrupted checksum

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/994533/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 996088] Re: Bind is not configured correctly on upgrade

2012-05-07 Thread Steve Langasek
** Description changed:

  On an upgrade to Precise, bind was not correctly reconfigured, resulting
  in a failure to resolve domain names.
  
- Solution was to reconfigure the bind9 package,
+ Solution was to dpkg-reconfigure the bind9 package, and turn off
+ resolvconf integration which was left on on upgrade.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
  Package: bind9 1:9.8.1.dfsg.P1-4
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-generic-pae 3.2.14
  Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic-pae i686
  ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7
  Architecture: i386
  Date: Mon May  7 11:03:12 2012
  EcryptfsInUse: Yes
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release i386 (20111011)
  ProcEnviron:
-  TERM=xterm
-  PATH=(custom, user)
-  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
-  SHELL=/bin/bash
+  TERM=xterm
+  PATH=(custom, user)
+  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
  RelatedPackageVersions:
-  bind9utils 1:9.8.1.dfsg.P1-4
-  apparmor   2.7.102-0ubuntu3
+  bind9utils 1:9.8.1.dfsg.P1-4
+  apparmor   2.7.102-0ubuntu3
  SourcePackage: bind9
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-03 (125 days ago)
  modified.conffile..etc.bind.named.conf.options: [modified]
  mtime.conffile..etc.bind.named.conf.options: 2012-03-11T22:48:21.929661

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996088

Title:
  Bind is not configured correctly on upgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/996088/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 996088] Re: Bind is not configured correctly on upgrade

2012-05-07 Thread Steve Langasek
LaMont, this is related to bug #933723; we've turned resolvconf
integration off by default, but in the upgrade case it's still on, which
causes problems now that resolvconf is installed by default.  Could we
include a one-time upgrade check when upgrading to the version in 12.04
that checks whether the resolvconf debconf question has been seen, and
if it hasn't been (i.e. we're using the automatic default), to turn off
resolvconf integration on upgrade?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996088

Title:
  Bind is not configured correctly on upgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/996088/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 974584] Re: Semaphores cannot be created in lxc container

2012-05-18 Thread Steve Langasek
I can confirm Serge's analysis here.  I'm surprised that this hasn't
bitten us more severely before now, given that I see all my compat
symlinks are wrong in my (iteratively upgraded) precise chroots here;
apparently things really don't care so much about the compat these days.

We should definitely fix this for .1.

** Also affects: sysvinit (Ubuntu Precise)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: lxc (Ubuntu Precise)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: sysvinit (Ubuntu Quantal)
   Importance: High
   Status: Confirmed

** Also affects: lxc (Ubuntu Quantal)
   Importance: High
 Assignee: Serge Hallyn (serge-hallyn)
   Status: Fix Released

** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: New => Fix Released

** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu Quantal)
   Status: Confirmed => Triaged

** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu Precise)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu Precise)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-12.04.1

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/974584

Title:
  Semaphores cannot be created in lxc container

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/974584/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 687635] Re: No easy way to make Samba shares permanent

2012-05-19 Thread Steve Langasek
Not sure why this was assigned to mountall; mountall only parses
/etc/fstab at boot time, it certainly isn't going to be responsible for
writing to it.  Reassigning to nautilus, which I guess is what would
have to provide an option to convert gvfs mounts into boot-time mounts
by adding them to the /etc/fstab.  (This is probably a bad idea, but I
guess that's a decision for the desktop team.)

** Package changed: mountall (Ubuntu) => gvfs (Ubuntu)

** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Wishlist

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/687635

Title:
  No easy way to make Samba shares permanent

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/687635/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 996088] Re: Bind is not configured correctly on upgrade (resolvconf integration)

2012-05-20 Thread Steve Langasek
** Summary changed:

- Bind is not configured correctly on upgrade
+ Bind is not configured correctly on upgrade (resolvconf integration)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996088

Title:
  Bind is not configured correctly on upgrade (resolvconf integration)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/996088/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 980682] Re: postconf can't open main.cf with the result that /etc/resolvconf/update-libc.d/postfix fails trying to copy /etc/resolv.conf onto itself

2012-05-22 Thread Steve Langasek
I've confirmed this fix here.  Prior to upgrade,
/var/log/upstart/resolvconf.log showed this error.  After upgrade, the
error is no longer happening.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/980682

Title:
  postconf can't open main.cf with the result that /etc/resolvconf
  /update-libc.d/postfix fails trying to copy /etc/resolv.conf onto
  itself

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/980682/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 980682] Re: postconf can't open main.cf with the result that /etc/resolvconf/update-libc.d/postfix fails trying to copy /etc/resolv.conf onto itself

2012-05-22 Thread Steve Langasek
(the error was reproducible for me because /usr is on a separate
partition)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/980682

Title:
  postconf can't open main.cf with the result that /etc/resolvconf
  /update-libc.d/postfix fails trying to copy /etc/resolv.conf onto
  itself

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/980682/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 993794] Re: Precise can't connect to a network guarded by an authentication webserver whose address can only be looked up with one of the nameservers whose address is provided by DHCP

2012-05-24 Thread Steve Langasek
** No longer affects: resolvconf (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993794

Title:
  Precise can't connect to a network guarded by an authentication
  webserver whose address can only be looked up with one of the
  nameservers whose address is provided by DHCP

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/993794/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 423252] Re: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd

2012-05-24 Thread Steve Langasek
not "committed" until it's available in -proposed

** Changed in: libgcrypt11 (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: Fix Committed => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libnss-ldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423252

Title:
  NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2
  suexec, and atd

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/423252/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 569757] Re: NIS upstart dependency broken for lucid

2012-05-24 Thread Steve Langasek
Jeremy, any word on testing this nis SRU?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nis in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569757

Title:
  NIS upstart dependency broken for lucid

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nis/+bug/569757/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 999996] Re: package mcollective 1.2.1+dfsg-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: mcollective triggers failed when installing mcollective-plugins

2012-05-29 Thread Steve Langasek
Unsubscribing motu-sru, which is no longer an active team.  Please
follow the SRU process described at
.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to mcollective in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96

Title:
  package mcollective 1.2.1+dfsg-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
  mcollective triggers failed when installing mcollective-plugins

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mcollective/+bug/96/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 711635] Re: init: post-start can cause respawn to hang

2012-05-31 Thread Steve Langasek
** Also affects: upstart (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: upstart (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

** Changed in: upstart (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: upstart (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => James Hunt (jamesodhunt)

** Changed in: upstart (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: New => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-5.1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711635

Title:
  init: post-start can cause respawn to hang

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/upstart/+bug/711635/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 711635] Re: init: post-start can cause respawn to hang

2012-05-31 Thread Steve Langasek
** Changed in: upstart (Ubuntu Natty)
   Status: New => Won't Fix

** Changed in: upstart (Ubuntu Oneiric)
   Status: New => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-5.1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711635

Title:
  init: post-start can cause respawn to hang

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/upstart/+bug/711635/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 711635] Re: init: post-start can cause respawn to hang

2012-05-31 Thread Steve Langasek
** Changed in: upstart (Ubuntu Precise)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

** Changed in: upstart (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: New => Triaged

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-5.1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711635

Title:
  init: post-start can cause respawn to hang

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/upstart/+bug/711635/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1007293] Re: nis doesn't work anymore after upgrade to 12.04

2012-06-01 Thread Steve Langasek
hi alex,

It would also be helpful to see the output of this command as root:

 initctl list | grep yp

and to have the contents of /etc/default/nis attached.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nis in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007293

Title:
  nis doesn't work anymore after upgrade to 12.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nis/+bug/1007293/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 1007293] Re: nis doesn't work anymore after upgrade to 12.04

2012-06-04 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 02:43:32PM -, vagk wrote:
> I inserted 
>exec > /var/log/nis-debug.log 2>&1
> in /etc/init/ypbind.conf after script line

That really shouldn't be necessary.  You should be able to read the log
files from /var/log/upstart, without modifying the upstart job.

alex, do you have any interesting log files in /var/log/upstart on your
system related to ypbind?

> and the output in  nis-debug.log was 
>   No NIS server and no -broadcast option specified.
>   Add a NIS server to the /etc/yp.conf configuration file,
>   or start ypbind with the -broadcast option.

> my /etc/yp.conf is
>   ypserver nisserver

> (nisserver is resolved by dns ok, tried to use the ip but the problems
> seems elsewhere)

> I dont use network-manager (purged) and my /etc/network/interfaces file is 
> the following
>   allow-hotplug lo  eth0
>   auto lo eth0
>   iface lo inet loopback
>   iface eth0 inet dhcp

> The problem seems to be that when ypbind is initially started networking
> is not up yet

There's no reason for this that I can see, if your network is configured in
/etc/network/interfaces.  The ypbind job itself is configured to start only
after the network is up.  ypbind may also be started by the start-ypbind
job, but this job also only starts in response to a series of other jobs
that all wait for the network.

alex, vagk: could each of you please set YPBINDARGS="-no-dbus -debug" in
/etc/default/nis, reboot, and attach /var/log/upstart/ypbind.log so we can
see exactly what's failing?

> Some lines from /var/log/syslog showing that ypbind is started before
> networking and although it is respawning it does not succeed

> Jun  4 16:47:48 ubuntutestclient ypbind: Host name lookup failure
> ..
> Jun  4 16:47:48 ubuntutestclient dhclient: DHCPDISCOVER on eth0 to 
> 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 3
> Jun  4 16:47:48 ubuntutestclient dhclient: DHCPREQUEST of 192.168.10.53 on 
> eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67
> Jun  4 16:47:48 ubuntutestclient dhclient: DHCPOFFER of 192.168.10.53 from 
> 192.168.10.165
> Jun  4 16:47:48 ubuntutestclient dhclient: DHCPACK of 192.168.10.53 from 
> 192.168.10.165
> Jun  4 16:47:48 ubuntutestclient rpcbind: Cannot open 
> '/run/rpcbind/rpcbind.xdr' file for reading, errno 2 (No such file or 
> directory)
> Jun  4 16:47:48 ubuntutestclient rpcbind: Cannot open 
> '/run/rpcbind/portmap.xdr' file for reading, errno 2 (No such file or 
> directory)
> Jun  4 16:47:48 ubuntutestclient kernel: [8.984711] init: portmap-wait 
> (statd) main process (531) killed by TERM signal
> ..
> Jun  4 16:47:48 ubuntutestclient kernel: [9.448250] init: ypbind main 
> process (583) terminated with status 1
> Jun  4 16:47:48 ubuntutestclient kernel: [9.448372] init: ypbind main 
> process ended, respawning
> ..
> Jun  4 16:47:54 ubuntutestclient kernel: [   15.423670] init: wait-for-state 
> (gdmypbind) main process (1076) killed by TERM signal
> Jun  4 16:47:54 ubuntutestclient kernel: [   15.429334] init: wait-for-state 
> (lightdmypbind) main process (1084) killed by TERM signal

This is quite unusual since as I said, each of these other services (atd and
lightdm) are supposed to wait for events ('runlevel 2') that are themselves
dependent on the network being up.  You may also want to boot with --verbose
on the kernel commandline, so that we can see exactly what order the upstart
events are firing in.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nis in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007293

Title:
  nis doesn't work anymore after upgrade to 12.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nis/+bug/1007293/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 1007293] Re: nis doesn't work anymore after upgrade to 12.04

2012-06-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 02:25:02PM -, vagk wrote:
> I changed the interfaces file to get static ip and retried.

This should not matter because dhclient doesn't return control to ifupdown
until it successfully acquires an IP.

> It failed but for a different reason.

> My /etc/yp.conf has no direct ip but a cname
>   ypserver nisserver

> When networking got up /etc/resolv.conf was empty and that is because
> resolvconf package deleted the information that the last dhclient command
> wrote to /etc/resolv.conf

That's because you had invalid network configuration information:  you were
no longer using DHCP, but had not specified another source for DNS server
information.

> So I removed package resolvconf (which I don't like in lab setups, same
> as network-manager) and voila!

resolvconf is the supported mechanism for managing /etc/resolv.conf in
12.04.  Outside of your experiments here for debugging, I strongly advise
that you keep it installed.

> I rebooted and now I there was a 10 second delay before lightdm started
> and ypbind got running.

What is the system doing during this 10 second delay?

>  Static IP on /etc/network/interfaces and nis server by IP in /etc/yp.conf
> works (or by cname and without resolvconf package)

>  IP from dhcp on /etc/network/interfaces does not work.  It seems that
> ypbind starts before networking

I'm still lacking the debugging information to see why it's starting before
networking for you.  For that I need to see the syslog output of a boot with
--verbose.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nis in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007293

Title:
  nis doesn't work anymore after upgrade to 12.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nis/+bug/1007293/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 1007293] Re: nis doesn't work anymore after upgrade to 12.04

2012-06-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 12:33:14PM -, alex wrote:
> If I try to start ypbind:
> # start ypbind
> start: Job is already running: ypbind

When this happens, it may be useful to grab the output of 'status ypbind' as
well.

But regardless, your log shows the same hostname lookup failure, so we'll
need to see the syslog output when booting with --verbose to understand why.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nis in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007293

Title:
  nis doesn't work anymore after upgrade to 12.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nis/+bug/1007293/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1007293] Re: nis doesn't work anymore after upgrade to 12.04

2012-06-05 Thread Steve Langasek
Ok, here's the problem:

Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [8.910762] init: portmap main 
process (524) became new process (527)
Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [8.921625] init: portmap state 
changed from spawned to post-start
Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [8.921947] init: portmap state 
changed from post-start to running
Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [8.922172] init: Handling started 
event
Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [8.922498] init: ypbind goal changed

This shows that ypbind is being started as soon as portmap starts.  But
the start condition for ypbind is:

start on (started portmap ON_BOOT=
  or (started portmap ON_BOOT=y
  and ((filesystem and static-network-up) or failsafe-boot)))

So it appears that portmap is being started with ON_BOOT= instead of
with ON_BOOT=y, confusing ypbind into believing that as soon as portmap
starts, ypbind can also be started.

I believe this is due to a bug in either the portmap-wait or the statd
job, one of which needs to set ON_BOOT=y.

Going back a bit in the boot:

Jun  5 22:24:03 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [5.844424] init: Handling 
remote-filesystems event
Jun  5 22:24:03 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [6.950731] init: Handling 
local-filesystems event
Jun  5 22:24:03 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [7.038074] init: Handling 
filesystem event
Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [7.415998] init: statd-mounting 
goal changed from stop to start
Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [7.422316] init: statd-mounting 
state changed from waiting to starting
Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [8.364354] init: statd goal changed 
from stop to start
Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [8.371049] init: statd state 
changed from waiting to starting
Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [8.377212] init: statd state 
changed from starting to pre-start
Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [8.405912] init: statd pre-start 
process (489)
Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [8.565510] init: portmap-wait 
(statd) goal changed from stop to start
Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [8.565696] init: portmap-wait 
(statd) state changed from waiting to starting
Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [8.566173] init: portmap-wait 
(statd) state changed from starting to pre-start
Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [8.566342] init: portmap-wait 
(statd) state changed from pre-start to spawned
Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [8.600918] init: portmap-wait 
(statd) main process (505)
Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [8.601291] init: portmap-wait 
(statd) state changed from spawned to post-start
Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [8.611092] init: portmap-wait 
(statd) state changed from post-start to running
Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [8.816319] init: portmap goal 
changed from stop to start
Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [8.816509] init: portmap state 
changed from waiting to starting
Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [8.816991] init: portmap state 
changed from starting to pre-start
Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [8.844586] init: portmap pre-start 
process (522)
Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [8.848499] init: portmap pre-start 
process (522) exited normally
Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [8.848698] init: portmap state 
changed from pre-start to spawned
Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [8.876393] init: portmap main 
process (524)
Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [8.882281] init: portmap main 
process (524) executable changed
Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [8.910762] init: portmap main 
process (524) became new process (527)
Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [8.921625] init: portmap state 
changed from spawned to post-start
Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [8.921947] init: portmap state 
changed from post-start to running
Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [8.922498] init: ypbind goal 
changed from stop to start
Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [8.922676] init: ypbind state 
changed from waiting to starting
Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [8.923185] init: ypserv goal 
changed from stop to start
Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [8.923359] init: ypserv state 
changed from waiting to starting
Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [8.923996] init: gssd goal changed 
from stop to start
Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [8.928775] init: gssd state changed 
from waiting to starting
Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [8.939997] init: portmap-wait 
(statd) goal changed from start to stop
Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [8.943619] init: portmap-wait 
(statd) state changed from running to pre-stop
Jun  5 22:24:04 intwinxpubuntu6 kernel: [8.950994] init: portmap-wait 
(statd) state changed from pre-stop to s

[Bug 1009206] Re: krb5-user deinstalled because of unmet dependencies

2012-06-05 Thread Steve Langasek
>  krb5-user : Depends: libkrb5-3 (= 1.10+dfsg~beta1-2) but
1.10+dfsg~beta1-2ubuntu0.1 is to be installed

You have a version of libkrb5-3 from precise-proposed installed, but the
precise-proposed repository is not enabled on your system.  You need to
either enable precise-proposed and install the matching krb5-user
package, or downgrade libkrb5-3 to the version in the precise release.

** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009206

Title:
  krb5-user  deinstalled because of unmet dependencies

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/krb5/+bug/1009206/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1007293] Re: nis doesn't work anymore after upgrade to 12.04

2012-06-05 Thread Steve Langasek
I believe the right place to export ON_BOOT=y is part of the /etc/init
/portmap-wait.conf job.  You should be able to confirm this locally by
changing this line:

  start portmap || true

to:

  start portmap ON_BOOT=y || true

I'll prepare an upload to fix this.

** Package changed: nis (Ubuntu) => rpcbind (Ubuntu)

** Changed in: rpcbind (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Triaged

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nis in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007293

Title:
  nis doesn't work anymore after upgrade to 12.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rpcbind/+bug/1007293/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 423252] Re: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd

2012-06-14 Thread Steve Langasek
** Tags added: verification-done-lucid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libnss-ldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423252

Title:
  NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2
  suexec, and atd

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/423252/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 90812] Re: perl backend can't use dynamically loaded modules (DBI, POSIX...)

2012-06-17 Thread Steve Langasek
This was fixed in version 2.4.25-4 of the openldap package in Debian, so
in Ubuntu is fixed for 12.04 and later.

** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap2.3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/90812

Title:
  perl backend can't use dynamically loaded modules (DBI, POSIX...)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/openldap/+bug/90812/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 995495] Re: Upgrade from Ubuntu 11.10 to 12.04 breaks slapd

2012-06-17 Thread Steve Langasek
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 990742 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/990742

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 990742
   [SRU] slapd fails to upgrade: requires libsasl2-2 (>= 2.1.24) installed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/995495

Title:
  Upgrade from Ubuntu 11.10  to 12.04 breaks slapd

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/995495/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 937613] Re: Segmentation fault in libc

2012-06-17 Thread Steve Langasek
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 921489 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/921489

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 921489
   Segmentation fault in slapd (related to GSSAPI?)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/937613

Title:
  Segmentation fault in libc

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/937613/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 978907] Re: [SRU] capture-output fails in glance-control

2012-06-19 Thread Steve Langasek
> The parameter --capture-output lets glance-control fail on some distributions
> (eg openSUSE) that do not have a /usr/bin/logger (but rather /bin/logger).

There is no point in opening a bug against the Ubuntu package for an
issue that has no impact in Ubuntu.  That is not the intent of the SRU
process.

** Changed in: glance (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Invalid

** Changed in: glance (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: Fix Committed => Invalid

** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to glance in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/978907

Title:
  [SRU] capture-output fails in glance-control

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/978907/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1010473] Please test proposed package

2012-06-25 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Chuck, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nova into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please help us by testing this new package.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.  If this package fixes the bug for you
please change the bug tag from verification-needed to verification-done.
If it does not, change the tag to verification-failed.  In either case
details of your testing will help us make a better decision.  Further
information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1010473

Title:
  [SRU] Tracker for 12.04 Openstack Updates

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/1010473/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1000403] Re: [SRU] multi scheduler does not handle capabilities updates correctly

2012-06-25 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Armando, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nova into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please help us by testing this new package.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.  If this package fixes the bug for you
please change the bug tag from verification-needed to verification-done.
If it does not, change the tag to verification-failed.  In either case
details of your testing will help us make a better decision.  Further
information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1000403

Title:
  [SRU] multi scheduler does not handle capabilities updates correctly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1000403/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1000261] Re: newer `qemu-img info` causes in exception when finding the backing file for qcow2 images

2012-06-25 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Pádraig, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nova into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please help us by testing this new package.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.  If this package fixes the bug for you
please change the bug tag from verification-needed to verification-done.
If it does not, change the tag to verification-failed.  In either case
details of your testing will help us make a better decision.  Further
information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1000261

Title:
  newer `qemu-img info` causes in exception when finding the backing
  file for qcow2 images

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1000261/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1010514] Re: Source group based security group rule without protocol and port causes failures

2012-06-25 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Soren, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nova into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please help us by testing this new package.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.  If this package fixes the bug for you
please change the bug tag from verification-needed to verification-done.
If it does not, change the tag to verification-failed.  In either case
details of your testing will help us make a better decision.  Further
information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1010514

Title:
  Source group based security group rule without protocol and port
  causes failures

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1010514/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 990237] Re: [sru] libvirt get_console_output: 'instance_name' is not defined

2012-06-25 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Dan, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nova into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please help us by testing this new package.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.  If this package fixes the bug for you
please change the bug tag from verification-needed to verification-done.
If it does not, change the tag to verification-failed.  In either case
details of your testing will help us make a better decision.  Further
information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/990237

Title:
  [sru] libvirt get_console_output:  'instance_name' is not defined

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/990237/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 988615] Re: [SRU] xen: destroy_vdi breaks because session is not passed in

2012-06-25 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Renuka, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nova into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please help us by testing this new package.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.  If this package fixes the bug for you
please change the bug tag from verification-needed to verification-done.
If it does not, change the tag to verification-failed.  In either case
details of your testing will help us make a better decision.  Further
information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988615

Title:
  [SRU] xen: destroy_vdi breaks because session is not passed in

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/988615/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 989764] Re: [SRU] timeout on EC2 CreateImage action is 60 hours instead of 1 hour

2012-06-25 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Eoghan, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nova into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please help us by testing this new package.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.  If this package fixes the bug for you
please change the bug tag from verification-needed to verification-done.
If it does not, change the tag to verification-failed.  In either case
details of your testing will help us make a better decision.  Further
information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989764

Title:
  [SRU] timeout on EC2 CreateImage action is 60 hours instead of 1 hour

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/989764/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 987335] Re: [SRU] libvit/connection.py missing console_log variable

2012-06-25 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Alvaro, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nova into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please help us by testing this new package.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.  If this package fixes the bug for you
please change the bug tag from verification-needed to verification-done.
If it does not, change the tag to verification-failed.  In either case
details of your testing will help us make a better decision.  Further
information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/987335

Title:
  [SRU] libvit/connection.py missing console_log variable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/987335/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 983206] Re: [SRU] nova errors when keypair starts with 0XG using EC2 API

2012-06-25 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Joe, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nova into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please help us by testing this new package.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.  If this package fixes the bug for you
please change the bug tag from verification-needed to verification-done.
If it does not, change the tag to verification-failed.  In either case
details of your testing will help us make a better decision.  Further
information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/983206

Title:
  [SRU] nova errors when keypair starts with 0XG using EC2 API

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/983206/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 977759] Re: [SRU] With QuantumManager, nova-network does not start dnsmasq during initialization

2012-06-25 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Mandar, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nova into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please help us by testing this new package.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.  If this package fixes the bug for you
please change the bug tag from verification-needed to verification-done.
If it does not, change the tag to verification-failed.  In either case
details of your testing will help us make a better decision.  Further
information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/977759

Title:
  [SRU] With QuantumManager,  nova-network does not start dnsmasq during
  initialization

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/977759/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 975043] Re: [SRU] Cloudpipe VPN instance can loose connectivity after starting openvpn

2012-06-25 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Cor, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nova into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please help us by testing this new package.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.  If this package fixes the bug for you
please change the bug tag from verification-needed to verification-done.
If it does not, change the tag to verification-failed.  In either case
details of your testing will help us make a better decision.  Further
information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/975043

Title:
  [SRU] Cloudpipe VPN instance can loose connectivity after starting
  openvpn

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/975043/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 973194] Re: [SRU] Parallel VM creation fails when nova-computes share the disks and each nova-compute node has no cached images.

2012-06-25 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Mandar, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nova into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please help us by testing this new package.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.  If this package fixes the bug for you
please change the bug tag from verification-needed to verification-done.
If it does not, change the tag to verification-failed.  In either case
details of your testing will help us make a better decision.  Further
information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/973194

Title:
  [SRU] Parallel VM creation fails when nova-computes share the disks
  and each nova-compute node has no cached images.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/973194/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 971640] Re: [SRU] public key injection should be configurable

2012-06-25 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Peng, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nova into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please help us by testing this new package.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.  If this package fixes the bug for you
please change the bug tag from verification-needed to verification-done.
If it does not, change the tag to verification-failed.  In either case
details of your testing will help us make a better decision.  Further
information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971640

Title:
  [SRU] public key  injection should be configurable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/971640/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 968843] Re: [SRU] connection leak in rpc connection pool

2012-06-25 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello MotoKen, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nova into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please help us by testing this new package.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.  If this package fixes the bug for you
please change the bug tag from verification-needed to verification-done.
If it does not, change the tag to verification-failed.  In either case
details of your testing will help us make a better decision.  Further
information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968843

Title:
  [SRU] connection leak in rpc connection pool

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/968843/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 967931] Re: [SRU] killfilter should handle updated/deleted executables

2012-06-25 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Dan, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nova into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please help us by testing this new package.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.  If this package fixes the bug for you
please change the bug tag from verification-needed to verification-done.
If it does not, change the tag to verification-failed.  In either case
details of your testing will help us make a better decision.  Further
information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/967931

Title:
  [SRU] killfilter should handle updated/deleted executables

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/967931/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 962615] Re: [SRU] Unable to list volumes after building from snapshot

2012-06-25 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Brian, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nova into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please help us by testing this new package.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.  If this package fixes the bug for you
please change the bug tag from verification-needed to verification-done.
If it does not, change the tag to verification-failed.  In either case
details of your testing will help us make a better decision.  Further
information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/962615

Title:
  [SRU] Unable to list volumes after building from snapshot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/962615/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 952176] Re: [SRU] Cannot associate a second network/vlan to a tenant with "nova-manage network modify"

2012-06-25 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Eric, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nova into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please help us by testing this new package.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.  If this package fixes the bug for you
please change the bug tag from verification-needed to verification-done.
If it does not, change the tag to verification-failed.  In either case
details of your testing will help us make a better decision.  Further
information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/952176

Title:
  [SRU] Cannot associate a second network/vlan to a tenant with "nova-
  manage network modify"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/952176/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 754900] Re: [SRU] Nova-manage network delete does not delete from fixed_ips

2012-06-25 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello justinsb, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nova into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please help us by testing this new package.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.  If this package fixes the bug for you
please change the bug tag from verification-needed to verification-done.
If it does not, change the tag to verification-failed.  In either case
details of your testing will help us make a better decision.  Further
information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/754900

Title:
  [SRU] Nova-manage network delete does not delete from fixed_ips

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/754900/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 997014] Re: [SRU] Memory is not correctly computed for Xen+libvirt

2012-06-25 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Alvaro, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nova into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please help us by testing this new package.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.  If this package fixes the bug for you
please change the bug tag from verification-needed to verification-done.
If it does not, change the tag to verification-failed.  In either case
details of your testing will help us make a better decision.  Further
information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997014

Title:
  [SRU] Memory is not correctly computed for Xen+libvirt

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/997014/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 993663] Re: [SRU] dns_domains table mysql charset is 'latin1'. Should be 'utf8'

2012-06-25 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Dan, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nova into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please help us by testing this new package.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.  If this package fixes the bug for you
please change the bug tag from verification-needed to verification-done.
If it does not, change the tag to verification-failed.  In either case
details of your testing will help us make a better decision.  Further
information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993663

Title:
  [SRU] dns_domains table mysql charset is 'latin1'. Should be 'utf8'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/993663/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 992916] Re: [SRU] nova.tests.test_nova_rootwrap fails on Fedora 17

2012-06-25 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Russell, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nova into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please help us by testing this new package.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.  If this package fixes the bug for you
please change the bug tag from verification-needed to verification-done.
If it does not, change the tag to verification-failed.  In either case
details of your testing will help us make a better decision.  Further
information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/992916

Title:
  [SRU] nova.tests.test_nova_rootwrap fails on Fedora 17

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/992916/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1017712] Re: package libgssapi-krb5-2 1.10+dfsg~beta1-2ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade: libgssapi-krb5-2:amd64 1.10+dfsg~beta1-2ubuntu0.1 cannot be configured because libgssapi-krb5-2

2012-06-25 Thread Steve Langasek
This is not a bug in the krb5 package; since you mention this happened
due to a power loss during upgrade, you will need to fix up the state of
the packaging system by hand.

This command will probably fix things up:

 sudo apt-get install libgssapi-krb5-2:i386 libgssapi-krb5-2

** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017712

Title:
  package libgssapi-krb5-2 1.10+dfsg~beta1-2ubuntu0.1 failed to
  install/upgrade: libgssapi-krb5-2:amd64 1.10+dfsg~beta1-2ubuntu0.1
  cannot be configured because libgssapi-krb5-2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/krb5/+bug/1017712/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 974584] Re: Semaphores cannot be created in lxc container

2012-06-26 Thread Steve Langasek
I think there are the following possible valid end states that we want
to get to at the end of the postinst:

 - we're not in a chroot.  /dev/shm is bind mounted to /run/shm, with the 
reboot script handling the fix-up to make /dev/shm a symlink to /run/shm before 
next boot.
 - we're in a chroot and /dev is not bind mounted.  sysvshm should be mounted 
*somewhere* within the chroot, but we don't know where this will be done and 
we're not going to do it ourselves.  So dictate that this should be /run/shm, 
and make /dev/shm a symlink there.
 - we're in a chroot and /dev is bind mounted, and /dev/shm is a symlink to 
/run/shm (because the parent environment is also a recent Debian/Ubuntu 
release).  Make the /run/shm directory.
 - we're in a chroot, /dev is bind mounted, and /dev/shm is also bind mounted.  
This is not a good situation to be in, because it means that the future 
correctness of the chroot is dependent on the setup remaining the same on the 
host system - which it won't if the host system is an older Debian/Ubuntu 
release that is later upgraded.  But we do the best we can for now, and make 
/run/shm a symlink to /dev/shm.
 - we're in a chroot, /dev/ is bind mounted, and /dev/shm is a non-bind-mounted 
directory.  We can't fix this, so we should just create the /run/shm directory 
and leave /dev/shm alone.

Does that make sense?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/974584

Title:
  Semaphores cannot be created in lxc container

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/974584/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 974584] Re: Semaphores cannot be created in lxc container

2012-06-26 Thread Steve Langasek
If it does make sense, the implementation that follows is:

if mountpoint -q /dev && mountpoint -q /dev/shm; then
  compat_link /dev/shm /run/shm
else
  [ -d /run/shm ] || mkdir -p /run/shm
  mountpoint -q /dev/ || compat_link /run/shm /dev/shm
fi

BTW, I realize there's another possible scenario, which is that /dev/shm
is a bind mount when /dev itself is not.  We should probably handle that
the same as if they both are (make /run/shm a symlink to /dev/shm), in
which case the first check just needs to be "if mountpoint -q /dev/shm".

** Tags removed: rls-q-incoming

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/974584

Title:
  Semaphores cannot be created in lxc container

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/974584/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1006898] Re: [SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using vlan mode

2012-06-26 Thread Steve Langasek
Chuck, please put SRU information in the bug description, not in a
comment - it becomes hard to find this information when there are a
dozen more comments from testers.

** Description changed:

+ ** Issue **
+ 
  There is an issue with the way nova uses dnsmasq in VLAN mode. It starts
  up a single copy of dnsmasq for each vlan on the network host (or on
  every host in multi_host mode). The problem is in the way that dnsmasq
  binds to an ip address and port[2]. Both copies can respond to broadcast
  packet, but unicast packets can only be answered by one of the copies.
  
  In nova this means that guests from only one project will get responses
- to their unicast dhcp renew requests.  Unicast projects from guests in
+ to their unicast dhcp renew requests. Unicast projects from guests in
  other projects get ignored. What happens next is different depending on
- the guest os.  Linux generally will send a broadcast packet out after
+ the guest os. Linux generally will send a broadcast packet out after
  the unicast fails, and so the only effect is a small (tens of ms) hiccup
- while interface is reconfigured.  It can be much worse than that,
+ while interface is reconfigured. It can be much worse than that,
  however. I have seen cases where Windows just gives up and ends up with
  a non-configured interface.
  
  This bug was first noticed by some users of openstack who rolled their
  own fix. Basically, on linux, if you set the SO_BINDTODEVICE socket
  option, it will allow different daemons to share the port and respond to
  unicast packets, as long as they listen on different interfaces. I
  managed to communicate with Simon Kelley, the maintainer of dnsmasq and
  he has integrated a fix[3] for the issue in the current version[1] of
  dnsmaq.
  
  [3]
  
http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commitdiff;h=9380ba70d67db6b69f817d8e318de5ba1e990b12
+ 
+ ** Development Fix **
+ 
+ This has been fixed in quantal with the newer version of dnmasq.
+ 
+ ** Stable Fix **
+ 
+ I have backported the patch which fixes this issue, I have attached the
+ debdiff and the buildlog.
+ 
+ ** Test Case **
+ 
+ 1. Install openstack with vlan mode.
+ 2. Watch instances loose their IP addresses.
+ 
+ ** Regression Potential **
+ 
+ Minimal, most installations dont use this type of networking.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898

Title:
  [SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using vlan mode

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1006898/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1006898] Re: [SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using vlan mode

2012-06-26 Thread Steve Langasek
Please also complete the test case with explicit information about how
users can verify the *fix* for this bug.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898

Title:
  [SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using vlan mode

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1006898/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1006898] Re: [SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using vlan mode

2012-06-26 Thread Steve Langasek
I'm afraid I also don't understand this problem statement:

> There is an issue with the way nova uses dnsmasq in VLAN mode. It starts
> up a single copy of dnsmasq for each vlan on the network host (or on
> every host in multi_host mode). The problem is in the way that dnsmasq
> binds to an ip address and port[2]. Both copies can respond to broadcast
> packet, but unicast packets can only be answered by one of the copies.

What exactly is the network configuration that allows this to happen?
Does the host have multiple vlan interfaces using the same IP address?

That's the only scenario I see in which SO_BINDTODEVICE should make a
difference; but I don't understand why you would be using the same IP
address on multiple interfaces, virtual or otherwise.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898

Title:
  [SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using vlan mode

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1006898/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1006898] Re: [SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using vlan mode

2012-06-26 Thread Steve Langasek
... and now I've reviewed the debdiff, and found it to not match the
upstream commit.  This part of the patch to src/network.c is missing:

@@ -254,6 +261,7 @@ static int iface_allowed(struct irec **irecp, int if_index,
   iface->addr = *addr;
   iface->netmask = netmask;
   iface->tftp_ok = tftp_ok;
+  iface->dhcp_ok = dhcp_ok;
   iface->mtu = mtu;
   iface->dad = dad;
   iface->done = 0;

This means the value of dhcp_ok on each interface is *undefined*, and
this SRU would cause dnsmasq to *randomly* stop doing DHCP on configured
interfaces.

Rejecting from the queue.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898

Title:
  [SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using vlan mode

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1006898/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1006898] Re: [SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using vlan mode

2012-06-26 Thread Steve Langasek
Before the SRU team will reconsider an SRU for this, based on the above
I would also expect to see a regression test plan that accounts for
making sure dnsmasq continues to work correctly in configurations other
than the openstack one.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898

Title:
  [SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using vlan mode

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1006898/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 988819] Re: [SRU] wrong path to libxml2.so.2 in mod_security - broken by multiarch enabled libraries

2012-07-03 Thread Steve Langasek
I have serious misgivings about the particular approach taken here, in
SRU or otherwise.  Why does mod-security.load need to hard-code
libxml2.so.2 *at all*?  Isn't that why DSOs are dynamically linked to
their dependent libraries (which mod_security2.so is)?  And why is
libxml2.so.2 being special-cased here, when mod_security2.so is also
linked against liblua5.1.so.0?  Did anyone try to fix this by just
removing the LoadFile line completely?  That would be a much safer fix
than SRUing the core of apache2, and would probably fix the problem that
this SRU seems to be stalled waiting for indeterminate regression
testing of "corner cases".

A naive test here of commenting out this 'LoadFile' line shows that the
apache config validates, and apache2-mpm-prefork starts without any
problems.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988819

Title:
  [SRU] wrong path to libxml2.so.2 in mod_security - broken by multiarch
  enabled libraries

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/988819/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 488696] Re: syntax error in nsswitch config near [ syntax error ]

2012-08-01 Thread Steve Langasek
This information does not belong in /etc/nsswitch.conf.  nsswitch.conf
is a configuration file for libc, for selecting between NSS modules;
autofs should not be relying on being able to stick its own
configuration settings in this file.  And base-files should not be
adding such non-standard config settings.  Marking as invalid for base-
files.

A proper autofs fix is to move this configuration information out of
/etc/nsswitch.conf entirely, so that its parser stops tripping over
perfectly valid libc configurations.

** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu Quantal)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to autofs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/488696

Title:
  syntax error in nsswitch config near [ syntax error ]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs/+bug/488696/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 979758] Re: package fails to configure on failing to find /etc/init.d/nis

2012-08-01 Thread Steve Langasek
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 993291 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993291

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 993291
   [SRU] package nis 3.17-32ubuntu1.2 failed to install/upgrade: invoke-rc.d: 
unknown initscript, /etc/init.d/nis not found.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nis in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979758

Title:
  package fails to configure on failing to find /etc/init.d/nis

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nis/+bug/979758/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 569757] Re: NIS upstart dependency broken for lucid

2012-08-01 Thread Steve Langasek
I'm marking this verification-failed on account of bug #993291, which is
fixed in precise and quantal but which is still present in the version
of the nis package in the -proposed queue.

** Tags removed: verification-done verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-failed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nis in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569757

Title:
  NIS upstart dependency broken for lucid

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nis/+bug/569757/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 569757] Re: NIS upstart dependency broken for lucid

2012-08-01 Thread Steve Langasek
Since bug #993291 only affects the upgrade path from a previous SRUed
version to a later version that includes this bug fix, it should only
impact the following upgrades:

 lucid->precise
 natty->oneiric
 oneiric->precise

So the only supported upgrade path from lucid is the one to precise, and
precise's preinst has the fix, so it should be safe to publish the lucid
SRU, which requires no further changes.

The oneiric SRU should be updated, so that when the *natty* SRU is
published, it doesn't result in failures on natty->oneiric upgrade.

And we can apply the same fix to natty as well, but there's no supported
upgrade path from lucid to natty so I'm not sure it makes a difference
really.  I'm happy to update the natty SRU if that's the consensus.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nis in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569757

Title:
  NIS upstart dependency broken for lucid

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nis/+bug/569757/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 993291] Re: [SRU] package nis 3.17-32ubuntu1.2 failed to install/upgrade: invoke-rc.d: unknown initscript, /etc/init.d/nis not found.

2012-08-01 Thread Steve Langasek
This also affects the natty->oneiric SRU upgrade path, so I've uploaded
this fix to oneiric-proposed too.

** Also affects: nis (Ubuntu Oneiric)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: nis (Ubuntu Oneiric)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: nis (Ubuntu Oneiric)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

** Changed in: nis (Ubuntu Oneiric)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Steve Langasek (vorlon)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nis in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993291

Title:
  [SRU] package nis 3.17-32ubuntu1.2 failed to install/upgrade: invoke-
  rc.d: unknown initscript, /etc/init.d/nis not found.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nis/+bug/993291/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 569757] Re: NIS upstart dependency broken for lucid

2012-08-01 Thread Steve Langasek
** Tags removed: verification-failed
** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nis in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569757

Title:
  NIS upstart dependency broken for lucid

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nis/+bug/569757/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1014864] Re: [MIR] New package - walinuxagent

2012-08-09 Thread Steve Langasek
The walinuxagent package in precise-proposed NEW queue is based on an
earlier version from quantal, so is missing this change:

  * Restrict target architectures to i386 and amd64.

I assume that if this was worth an upload in quantal, we should have it
in the precise version as well, in which case it should be included on
the first accept so we don't have to redo the NEW processing.  Can you
please reupload with this fix?

** Changed in: walinuxagent (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014864

Title:
  [MIR] New package - walinuxagent

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/+bug/1014864/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1014864] Re: [MIR] New package - walinuxagent

2012-08-09 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Ben, or anyone else affected,

Accepted walinuxagent into precise-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/1.0~git20120606.c16f5e9-0ubuntu2~12.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this update
out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please change the bug tag from
verification-needed to verification-done.  If it does not, change the
tag to verification-failed.  In either case, details of your testing
will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: walinuxagent (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014864

Title:
  [MIR] New package - walinuxagent

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/+bug/1014864/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1035441] Re: package libk5crypto3 1.10+dfsg~beta1-2ubuntu0.3 failed to install/upgrade: libk5crypto3:amd64 1.10+dfsg~beta1-2ubuntu0.3 cannot be configured because libk5crypto3

2012-08-10 Thread Steve Langasek
The error in the log is:

Voorbereiden om libk5crypto3 1.10+dfsg~beta1-2ubuntu0.2 te vervangen (door 
.../libk5crypto3_1.10+dfsg~beta1-2ubuntu0.3_amd64.deb) ...
Uitpakken van vervangende libk5crypto3 ...
dpkg: fout bij afhandelen van libk5crypto3:i386 (--configure):
 libk5crypto3:i386 1.10+dfsg~beta1-2ubuntu0.2 cannot be configured because 
libk5crypto3:amd64 is in a different version (1.10+dfsg~beta1-2ubuntu0.3)
dpkg: fout bij afhandelen van libk5crypto3 (--configure):
 libk5crypto3:amd64 1.10+dfsg~beta1-2ubuntu0.3 cannot be configured because 
libk5crypto3:i386 is in a different version (1.10+dfsg~beta1-2ubuntu0.2)

This indicates that your package manager configuration is in an invalid
state.  The libk5crypto3 update was published simultaneously for both
amd64 and i386 architectures, and an upgrade should therefore pull both
of them in together.  You may need to make sure that the mirror your
/etc/apt/sources.list doesn't have i386 disabled.

** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035441

Title:
  package libk5crypto3 1.10+dfsg~beta1-2ubuntu0.3 failed to
  install/upgrade: libk5crypto3:amd64 1.10+dfsg~beta1-2ubuntu0.3 cannot
  be configured because libk5crypto3

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/krb5/+bug/1035441/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1032322] Re: Swap space allocation for large memory systems needs improvement

2012-08-15 Thread Steve Langasek
Agreed that this is more than just a wishlist.  AIUI, for cloud compute
nodes this swap requirement can as much as double the local disk space
requirements, which is not an appropriate outcome.  I think we really
need different recipes for server vs. desktop installs, here.

** Changed in: partman-auto (Ubuntu Quantal)
   Importance: Wishlist => Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032322

Title:
  Swap space allocation for large memory systems needs improvement

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-auto/+bug/1032322/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1547183] Re: Remove php5 specific packages from the archive

2016-03-24 Thread Steve Langasek
** Changed in: drupal7-mod-jscommunicator (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547183

Title:
  Remove php5 specific packages from the archive

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/civicrm/+bug/1547183/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1547183] Re: Remove php5 specific packages from the archive

2016-03-24 Thread Steve Langasek
** Changed in: drupal7-mod-jssip (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547183

Title:
  Remove php5 specific packages from the archive

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/civicrm/+bug/1547183/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1547183] Re: Remove php5 specific packages from the archive

2016-03-24 Thread Steve Langasek
** Changed in: drupal7-mod-libraries (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

** Changed in: civicrm (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547183

Title:
  Remove php5 specific packages from the archive

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/civicrm/+bug/1547183/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1547183] Re: Remove php5 specific packages from the archive

2016-03-24 Thread Steve Langasek
Removing packages from xenial:
libphp-jpgraph 1.5.2-12.1 in xenial
libphp-jpgraph 1.5.2-12.1 in xenial amd64
libphp-jpgraph 1.5.2-12.1 in xenial arm64
libphp-jpgraph 1.5.2-12.1 in xenial armhf
libphp-jpgraph 1.5.2-12.1 in xenial i386
libphp-jpgraph 1.5.2-12.1 in xenial powerpc
libphp-jpgraph 1.5.2-12.1 in xenial ppc64el
libphp-jpgraph 1.5.2-12.1 in xenial s390x
libphp-jpgraph-examples 1.5.2-12.1 in xenial amd64
libphp-jpgraph-examples 1.5.2-12.1 in xenial arm64
libphp-jpgraph-examples 1.5.2-12.1 in xenial armhf
libphp-jpgraph-examples 1.5.2-12.1 in xenial i386
libphp-jpgraph-examples 1.5.2-12.1 in xenial powerpc
libphp-jpgraph-examples 1.5.2-12.1 in xenial ppc64el
libphp-jpgraph-examples 1.5.2-12.1 in xenial s390x
Comment: only supports PHP5; LP: #1547183
1 package successfully removed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547183

Title:
  Remove php5 specific packages from the archive

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/civicrm/+bug/1547183/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1547183] Re: Remove php5 specific packages from the archive

2016-03-24 Thread Steve Langasek
Removing packages from xenial:
libkohana3.1-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial
libkohana-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial amd64
libkohana-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial arm64
libkohana-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial armhf
libkohana-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial i386
libkohana-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial powerpc
libkohana-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial ppc64el
libkohana-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial s390x
libkohana3.1-core-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial amd64
libkohana3.1-core-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial arm64
libkohana3.1-core-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial armhf
libkohana3.1-core-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial i386
libkohana3.1-core-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial powerpc
libkohana3.1-core-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial ppc64el
libkohana3.1-core-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial s390x
libkohana3.1-mod-auth-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial amd64
libkohana3.1-mod-auth-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial arm64
libkohana3.1-mod-auth-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial armhf
libkohana3.1-mod-auth-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial i386
libkohana3.1-mod-auth-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial powerpc
libkohana3.1-mod-auth-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial ppc64el
libkohana3.1-mod-auth-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial s390x
libkohana3.1-mod-cache-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial amd64
libkohana3.1-mod-cache-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial arm64
libkohana3.1-mod-cache-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial armhf
libkohana3.1-mod-cache-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial i386
libkohana3.1-mod-cache-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial powerpc
libkohana3.1-mod-cache-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial ppc64el
libkohana3.1-mod-cache-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial s390x
libkohana3.1-mod-codebench-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial amd64
libkohana3.1-mod-codebench-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial arm64
libkohana3.1-mod-codebench-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial armhf
libkohana3.1-mod-codebench-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial i386
libkohana3.1-mod-codebench-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial powerpc
libkohana3.1-mod-codebench-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial ppc64el
libkohana3.1-mod-codebench-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial s390x
libkohana3.1-mod-database-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial amd64
libkohana3.1-mod-database-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial arm64
libkohana3.1-mod-database-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial armhf
libkohana3.1-mod-database-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial i386
libkohana3.1-mod-database-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial powerpc
libkohana3.1-mod-database-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial ppc64el
libkohana3.1-mod-database-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial s390x
libkohana3.1-mod-image-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial amd64
libkohana3.1-mod-image-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial arm64
libkohana3.1-mod-image-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial armhf
libkohana3.1-mod-image-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial i386
libkohana3.1-mod-image-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial powerpc
libkohana3.1-mod-image-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial ppc64el
libkohana3.1-mod-image-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial s390x
libkohana3.1-mod-orm-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial amd64
libkohana3.1-mod-orm-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial arm64
libkohana3.1-mod-orm-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial armhf
libkohana3.1-mod-orm-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial i386
libkohana3.1-mod-orm-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial powerpc
libkohana3.1-mod-orm-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial ppc64el
libkohana3.1-mod-orm-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial s390x
libkohana3.1-mod-unittest-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial amd64
libkohana3.1-mod-unittest-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial arm64
libkohana3.1-mod-unittest-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial armhf
libkohana3.1-mod-unittest-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial i386
libkohana3.1-mod-unittest-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial powerpc
libkohana3.1-mod-unittest-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial ppc64el
libkohana3.1-mod-unittest-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial s390x
libkohana3.1-mod-userguide-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial amd64
libkohana3.1-mod-userguide-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial arm64
libkohana3.1-mod-userguide-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial armhf
libkohana3.1-mod-userguide-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial i386
libkohana3.1-mod-userguide-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial powerpc
libkohana3.1-mod-userguide-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial ppc64el
libkohana3.1-mod-userguide-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial s390x
libkohana3.1-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial amd64
libkohana3.1-php 3.1.5-1.1 in xenial 

[Bug 1547183] Re: Remove php5 specific packages from the archive

2016-03-24 Thread Steve Langasek
Removing packages from xenial:
libkohana3.2-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial
libkohana3.2-core-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial amd64
libkohana3.2-core-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial arm64
libkohana3.2-core-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial armhf
libkohana3.2-core-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial i386
libkohana3.2-core-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial powerpc
libkohana3.2-core-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial ppc64el
libkohana3.2-core-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial s390x
libkohana3.2-mod-auth-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial amd64
libkohana3.2-mod-auth-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial arm64
libkohana3.2-mod-auth-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial armhf
libkohana3.2-mod-auth-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial i386
libkohana3.2-mod-auth-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial powerpc
libkohana3.2-mod-auth-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial ppc64el
libkohana3.2-mod-auth-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial s390x
libkohana3.2-mod-cache-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial amd64
libkohana3.2-mod-cache-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial arm64
libkohana3.2-mod-cache-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial armhf
libkohana3.2-mod-cache-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial i386
libkohana3.2-mod-cache-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial powerpc
libkohana3.2-mod-cache-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial ppc64el
libkohana3.2-mod-cache-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial s390x
libkohana3.2-mod-codebench-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial amd64
libkohana3.2-mod-codebench-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial arm64
libkohana3.2-mod-codebench-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial armhf
libkohana3.2-mod-codebench-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial i386
libkohana3.2-mod-codebench-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial powerpc
libkohana3.2-mod-codebench-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial ppc64el
libkohana3.2-mod-codebench-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial s390x
libkohana3.2-mod-database-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial amd64
libkohana3.2-mod-database-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial arm64
libkohana3.2-mod-database-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial armhf
libkohana3.2-mod-database-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial i386
libkohana3.2-mod-database-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial powerpc
libkohana3.2-mod-database-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial ppc64el
libkohana3.2-mod-database-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial s390x
libkohana3.2-mod-image-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial amd64
libkohana3.2-mod-image-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial arm64
libkohana3.2-mod-image-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial armhf
libkohana3.2-mod-image-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial i386
libkohana3.2-mod-image-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial powerpc
libkohana3.2-mod-image-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial ppc64el
libkohana3.2-mod-image-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial s390x
libkohana3.2-mod-orm-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial amd64
libkohana3.2-mod-orm-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial arm64
libkohana3.2-mod-orm-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial armhf
libkohana3.2-mod-orm-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial i386
libkohana3.2-mod-orm-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial powerpc
libkohana3.2-mod-orm-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial ppc64el
libkohana3.2-mod-orm-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial s390x
libkohana3.2-mod-unittest-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial amd64
libkohana3.2-mod-unittest-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial arm64
libkohana3.2-mod-unittest-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial armhf
libkohana3.2-mod-unittest-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial i386
libkohana3.2-mod-unittest-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial powerpc
libkohana3.2-mod-unittest-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial ppc64el
libkohana3.2-mod-unittest-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial s390x
libkohana3.2-mod-userguide-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial amd64
libkohana3.2-mod-userguide-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial arm64
libkohana3.2-mod-userguide-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial armhf
libkohana3.2-mod-userguide-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial i386
libkohana3.2-mod-userguide-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial powerpc
libkohana3.2-mod-userguide-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial ppc64el
libkohana3.2-mod-userguide-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial s390x
libkohana3.2-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial amd64
libkohana3.2-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial arm64
libkohana3.2-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial armhf
libkohana3.2-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial i386
libkohana3.2-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial powerpc
libkohana3.2-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial ppc64el
libkohana3.2-php 3.2.2-1 in xenial s390x
Comment: only supports PHP5; LP: #1547183


** Changed in: libkohana3.2-php (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ph

[Bug 1547183] Re: Remove php5 specific packages from the archive

2016-03-25 Thread Steve Langasek
Removing packages from xenial:
nanoweb 2.2.9-0ubuntu1 in xenial
nanoweb 2.2.9-0ubuntu1 in xenial amd64
nanoweb 2.2.9-0ubuntu1 in xenial arm64
nanoweb 2.2.9-0ubuntu1 in xenial armhf
nanoweb 2.2.9-0ubuntu1 in xenial i386
nanoweb 2.2.9-0ubuntu1 in xenial powerpc
nanoweb 2.2.9-0ubuntu1 in xenial ppc64el
nanoweb 2.2.9-0ubuntu1 in xenial s390x
nanoweb-contrib 2.2.9-0ubuntu1 in xenial amd64
nanoweb-contrib 2.2.9-0ubuntu1 in xenial arm64
nanoweb-contrib 2.2.9-0ubuntu1 in xenial armhf
nanoweb-contrib 2.2.9-0ubuntu1 in xenial i386
nanoweb-contrib 2.2.9-0ubuntu1 in xenial powerpc
nanoweb-contrib 2.2.9-0ubuntu1 in xenial ppc64el
nanoweb-contrib 2.2.9-0ubuntu1 in xenial s390x
nanoweb-doc 2.2.9-0ubuntu1 in xenial amd64
nanoweb-doc 2.2.9-0ubuntu1 in xenial arm64
nanoweb-doc 2.2.9-0ubuntu1 in xenial armhf
nanoweb-doc 2.2.9-0ubuntu1 in xenial i386
nanoweb-doc 2.2.9-0ubuntu1 in xenial powerpc
nanoweb-doc 2.2.9-0ubuntu1 in xenial ppc64el
nanoweb-doc 2.2.9-0ubuntu1 in xenial s390x
nanoweb-nanoconfig 2.2.9-0ubuntu1 in xenial amd64
nanoweb-nanoconfig 2.2.9-0ubuntu1 in xenial arm64
nanoweb-nanoconfig 2.2.9-0ubuntu1 in xenial armhf
nanoweb-nanoconfig 2.2.9-0ubuntu1 in xenial i386
nanoweb-nanoconfig 2.2.9-0ubuntu1 in xenial powerpc
nanoweb-nanoconfig 2.2.9-0ubuntu1 in xenial ppc64el
nanoweb-nanoconfig 2.2.9-0ubuntu1 in xenial s390x
Comment: only supports PHP5; LP: #1547183
1 package successfully removed.


** Changed in: nanoweb (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547183

Title:
  Remove php5 specific packages from the archive

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/civicrm/+bug/1547183/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1562349] Re: I can't update my Ubuntu cause of: package libgssapi-krb5-2:amd64 1.13.2+dfsg-2ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall

2016-03-26 Thread Steve Langasek
Thank you for reporting this bug and helping to improve Ubuntu.

Unfortunately, the logs in question only show that your system is in an
inconsistent state; they do not explain how the system got to be that
way, so there is nothing the developers can do to debug this and prevent
this from occurring in the future.

To correct the problem on your system, you need to do as the error
message indicates and reinstall the libgssapi-krb5-2 package.  You
should be able to achieve this by running the following command from a
terminal:

  sudo apt-get install --reinstall libgssapi-krb5-2

** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1562349

Title:
  I can't update my Ubuntu cause of: package libgssapi-krb5-2:amd64
  1.13.2+dfsg-2ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very
  bad inconsistent state; you should  reinstall it before attempting
  configuration

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/krb5/+bug/1562349/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 823878] Re: "bind interfaces only" requires a manual change to /etc/init/smbd.conf

2016-03-26 Thread Steve Langasek
>  - "IFACE=eth0": shouldn't "net-device-up" wait for all interfaces to
have an ip address ?

No. That's the 'static-network-up' event, mentioned above.  'net-device-
up' is a per-device event.

> - "started nmbd": I wonder whether that should not be put per default
by the samba's installation script. What do you think ?

No, that's definitely wrong and will cause 'service nmbd restart' to
hang.  And I don't know why this would be necessary on your system.

Regardless, beyond 14.04 the system init is handled completely
differently (via systemd instead of upstart) so this bug will no longer
apply in 16.04 LTS.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823878

Title:
  "bind interfaces only" requires a manual change to /etc/init/smbd.conf

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/823878/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1547183] Re: Remove php5 specific packages from the archive

2016-03-28 Thread Steve Langasek
Removing packages from xenial:
php5-midgard2 10.05.7-1build4 in xenial
php5-midgard2 10.05.7-1build4 in xenial amd64
php5-midgard2 10.05.7-1build4 in xenial arm64
php5-midgard2 10.05.7-1build4 in xenial armhf
php5-midgard2 10.05.7-1build4 in xenial i386
php5-midgard2 10.05.7-1build4 in xenial powerpc
php5-midgard2 10.05.7-1build4 in xenial ppc64el
php5-midgard2 10.05.7-1build4 in xenial s390x
Comment: only supports php5; LP: #1547183
1 package successfully removed.


** Changed in: php5-midgard2 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547183

Title:
  Remove php5 specific packages from the archive

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/civicrm/+bug/1547183/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1563027] [NEW] vsftpd 3.0.3-3ubuntu1 fails to start on installation

2016-03-28 Thread Steve Langasek
Public bug reported:

vsftpd 3.0.3-3ubuntu1 is stuck in xenial-proposed because it's failing
its autopkgtests.

The reason for the autopkgtest failure is straightforward; vsftpd is
failing to start on installation.

$ systemctl status vsftpd.service
● vsftpd.service - vsftpd FTP server
   Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/vsftpd.service; enabled; vendor preset: 
enabled)
   Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Mon 2016-03-28 19:55:47 UTC; 7min 
ago
 Main PID: 25705 (code=exited, status=2)

Mar 28 19:55:47 xenial-i386 systemd[1]: Starting vsftpd FTP server...
Mar 28 19:55:47 xenial-i386 systemd[1]: Started vsftpd FTP server.
Mar 28 19:55:47 xenial-i386 systemd[1]: vsftpd.service: Main process exited, 
code=exited, status=2/INVALIDARGUMENT
Mar 28 19:55:47 xenial-i386 systemd[1]: vsftpd.service: Unit entered failed 
state.
Mar 28 19:55:47 xenial-i386 systemd[1]: vsftpd.service: Failed with result 
'exit-code'.
$

Manually running the command from the service file fails with:

$ sudo /usr/sbin/vsftpd /etc/vsftpd.conf 
500 OOPS: vsftpd: not configured for standalone, must be started from inetd
$

This is due to debian/patches/0013-listen.patch, which has caused the
daemon to not listen on either ipv4 or ipv6, so it fails to start at
all.

** Affects: vsftpd (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Assignee: Chris J Arges (arges)
 Status: New

** Changed in: vsftpd (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Chris J Arges (arges)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vsftpd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1563027

Title:
  vsftpd 3.0.3-3ubuntu1 fails to start on installation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vsftpd/+bug/1563027/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1563111] Re: Sync php-pear 1:1.10.1+submodules+notgz-6 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2016-03-28 Thread Steve Langasek
This bug was fixed in the package php-pear - 1:1.10.1+submodules+notgz-6
Sponsored for Nish Aravamudan (nacc)

---
php-pear (1:1.10.1+submodules+notgz-6) unstable; urgency=medium

  * Add mv_conffile to move existing /etc/pear.conf to
/etc/pear/pear.conf

 -- Ondřej Surý   Tue, 22 Mar 2016 09:48:02 +0100

php-pear (1:1.10.1+submodules+notgz-5) unstable; urgency=medium

  * Replace /usr/share/doc/php-pear symlink by a dir (Closes: #817814)
  * Set PHP_PEAR_SYSCONF_DIR to /etc/pear (Closes: #818271)
  * Fix "PECL extensions FTBFS with PHP Fatal error:
Call to a member function getFilelist() on null" (Closes: #805222)
  * Standards-Version: 3.9.7
  * Updated Vcs-* fields to use https
  * Add lintian override for pear-package-without-pkg-php-tools-builddep

 -- Mathieu Parent   Sat, 19 Mar 2016 22:43:58 +0100

** Changed in: php-pear (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php-pear in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1563111

Title:
  Sync php-pear 1:1.10.1+submodules+notgz-6 (main) from Debian unstable
  (main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php-pear/+bug/1563111/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1473691] Re: [FFe] squid: Update to latest upstream release (3.5)

2016-03-29 Thread Steve Langasek
Nevermind, it seems someone already sponsored this upload.  So, for
future reference... :)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1473691

Title:
  [FFe] squid: Update to latest upstream release (3.5)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid3/+bug/1473691/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1473691] Re: [FFe] squid: Update to latest upstream release (3.5)

2016-03-29 Thread Steve Langasek
Ryan, for ease of review and sponsorship please provide an incremental
debdiff against the package that's already in xenial-proposed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1473691

Title:
  [FFe] squid: Update to latest upstream release (3.5)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid3/+bug/1473691/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1473691] Re: [FFe] squid: Update to latest upstream release (3.5)

2016-03-29 Thread Steve Langasek
if test -d /etc/squid3 && dpkg --compare-versions "$2" lt '3.5'; then
   #
   # handle the case where we have /etc/squid3 but the init script is
   # named squid.
   #
   service=squid3
   if ! test -e /etc/init.d/$service ; then
   service=squid
   fi
   invoke-rc.d $service stop
   invoke-rc.d $service start
else
   invoke-rc.d squid restart
fi

I had to look very carefully at the packages in trusty and wily to try
to figure out what this code is supposed to do, and I'm still not sure.
At first I believed it was buggy, then I came to believe it was just
pointless, now I'm convinced again that it's buggy.

The trusty version of the squid3 package ships an /etc/init/squid3.conf upstart 
job and no init script.
The wily version of the squid3 package ships both an /etc/init/squid3.conf 
upstart job, and an /etc/init.d/squid3 init script.

You are first looking for a script named /etc/init.d/squid3, and if it's
absent, you are stopping and starting the 'squid' service.  But if it's
*present*, you are stopping and starting the squid3 service, which is
certainly wrong.

So on upgrade from trusty, you will have removed /etc/init/squid3.conf
in the preinst of squid, and the old version of the squid3 package will
have stopped the squid3 service in its prerm because squid Conflicts:
old squid3 package and is being removed.  Then squid postinst stops
squid (unnecessary because not previously started), then starts squid.
So the code to get there is convoluted but this will work.

But on upgrade from wily, the old version of the squid3 package will
have stopped the squid3 service in its prerm because squid Conflicts:
old squid3 package and is being removed; and the new squid preinst will
have removed /etc/init/squid3.conf; but /etc/init.d/squid3, which is a
conffile, will still be on disk, so your code now tries to stop and then
start the old squid3 service, instead of stopping squid3 (which, again,
is redundant) and starting squid.

As far as I can see, the entire versioned code block here is wrong, and
you should *only* be restarting squid.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1473691

Title:
  [FFe] squid: Update to latest upstream release (3.5)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid3/+bug/1473691/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 1473691] Re: [FFe] squid: Update to latest upstream release (3.5)

2016-03-30 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 04:41:12AM -, Ryan Harper wrote:
> As far as I can see, the entire versioned code block here is wrong, and
> > you should *only* be restarting squid.

> The block (without my addition) is from debian itself.

Yes, and I believe it's wrong there also (unless their previous squid3
package, unlike ours, didn't stop itself in the prerm?)

> update-rc.d squid defaults 30 >/dev/null

OK, someone's living in 2005... The '30' sequence number is obsolete, and
also why is this not being driven by debhelper?

> However, this failed in our dist-upgrade from trusty scenario as the squid3
> service file no longer
> exists.  Reading your analysis; it seems that /etc/init.d/squid3 should
> still be on disk;
> but it was not.

No.  I said that in an upgrade from trusty, there *was no*
/etc/init.d/squid3 init script, only an /etc/init/squid3.conf upstart job.
And your maintainer script is removing /etc/init/squid3.conf on upgrade;
which is why the Debian logic fails.

> In the dist-upgrade from trusty case; I believe we can just use the squid
> restart.

Yes.

> In the upgrade from wily case, it's not clear to me why the
> /etc/init.d/squid3 service
> file would still be on disk when it wasn't when upgrading from trusty?

Because the wily version of the package *has* an /etc/init.d/squid3 file,
whereas the trusty package does not.  And nothing in the xenial package is
handling the removal of this stale conffile.

So:

 - fix the maintainer script to remove /etc/init.d/squid3 on upgrade
 - drop all the versioned upgrade logic and just call invoke-rc.d squid
  restart.

BTW, note that dpkg-maintscript-helper has to be called from several
different maintainer scripts with the same arguments, not just from the
preinst - the squid package already has several bugs because it's not doing
this correctly.  This is a royal pain to get right by hand, and all
right-thinking maintainers would use debian/squid.maintscript as documented
in dh_installdeb, instead of hand-editing maintainer scripts and trying to
keep them all in sync.  This *probably* will DTRT in the package, despite
the fact that squid3 is using the one-step-removed-from-obsolete debhelper
compat level 5.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1473691

Title:
  [FFe] squid: Update to latest upstream release (3.5)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid3/+bug/1473691/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1547183] Re: Remove php5 specific packages from the archive

2016-03-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Removing packages from xenial:
php-ps 1.3.7-1ubuntu2 in xenial
php5-ps 1.3.7-1ubuntu2 in xenial amd64
php5-ps 1.3.7-1ubuntu2 in xenial arm64
php5-ps 1.3.7-1ubuntu2 in xenial armhf
php5-ps 1.3.7-1ubuntu2 in xenial i386
php5-ps 1.3.7-1ubuntu2 in xenial powerpc
php5-ps 1.3.7-1ubuntu2 in xenial ppc64el
Comment: FTBFS, removed from Debian testing, php5-only; LP: #1547183
1 package successfully removed.


** Changed in: php-ps (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547183

Title:
  Remove php5 specific packages from the archive

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/civicrm/+bug/1547183/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1547183] Re: Remove php5 specific packages from the archive

2016-03-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Removing packages from xenial:
php-mysqlnd-ms 1.6.0-1build1 in xenial
php5-mysqlnd-ms 1.6.0-1build1 in xenial amd64
php5-mysqlnd-ms 1.6.0-1build1 in xenial arm64
php5-mysqlnd-ms 1.6.0-1build1 in xenial armhf
php5-mysqlnd-ms 1.6.0-1build1 in xenial i386
php5-mysqlnd-ms 1.6.0-1build1 in xenial powerpc
php5-mysqlnd-ms 1.6.0-1build1 in xenial ppc64el
php5-mysqlnd-ms 1.6.0-1build1 in xenial s390x
Comment: php5-only; LP: #1547183
1 package successfully removed.


** Changed in: php-mysqlnd-ms (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547183

Title:
  Remove php5 specific packages from the archive

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/civicrm/+bug/1547183/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1547183] Re: Remove php5 specific packages from the archive

2016-03-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Removing packages from xenial:
php-pinba 1.0.0-2build6 in xenial
php5-pinba 1.0.0-2build6 in xenial amd64
php5-pinba 1.0.0-2build6 in xenial arm64
php5-pinba 1.0.0-2build6 in xenial armhf
php5-pinba 1.0.0-2build6 in xenial i386
php5-pinba 1.0.0-2build6 in xenial powerpc
php5-pinba 1.0.0-2build6 in xenial ppc64el
php5-pinba 1.0.0-2build6 in xenial s390x
Comment: php7 support not released, removed from Debian unstable; LP: #1547183
1 package successfully removed.


** Changed in: php-pinba (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547183

Title:
  Remove php5 specific packages from the archive

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/civicrm/+bug/1547183/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1045616] Re: DHCP server handing out DNS server addresses but DHCP client does not write these to resolv.conf

2012-09-05 Thread Steve Langasek
> but having BIND server installed shouldn't be affecting the
> local DNS lookups, it's a stand-alone bind server...

Yep, that sounds like my original guess:

> probably a local DNS server that's installed and misconfigured
> such that it's talking to resolvconf when it shouldn't be.

So this sounds like bug #996088, except you say that this is a fresh
install of 12.04 rather than an upgrade.

Perhaps virtualmin is misconfiguring bind9?

Anyway, not a resolvconf bug then; possibly a bind9 bug; reassigning.

** Package changed: resolvconf (Ubuntu) => bind9 (Ubuntu)

** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1045616

Title:
  DHCP server handing out DNS server addresses but DHCP client does not
  write these to resolv.conf

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1045616/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1031065] Re: cloud-init-nonet runs 'start networking' explicitly

2012-09-05 Thread Steve Langasek
After reviewing the patches on bug #643289, I see that some further work
will be needed because those patches only adjust the 'mounting' event,
not the 'mounted' event.  IMHO we should do both.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1031065

Title:
  cloud-init-nonet runs 'start networking' explicitly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1031065/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1031065] Re: cloud-init-nonet runs 'start networking' explicitly

2012-09-05 Thread Steve Langasek
** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Triaged

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1031065

Title:
  cloud-init-nonet runs 'start networking' explicitly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1031065/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1047262] Re: race condition on startup between samba and cups

2012-09-07 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi James,

if status cups >/dev/null ; then
start wait-for-state WAITER=smbd WAIT_FOR=cups 
WAIT_STATE=running
fi

This solution has the effect that if the cups job is broken for any
reason, smbd will also not be started.  I don't think that's desirable.

We've tried hard in the past to ensure samba is *not* dependent on cups
being present before samba starts.  I think this would be better done as
a job in the samba package which is 'start on started cups' and will
prompt samba to reload its config.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1047262

Title:
  race condition on startup between samba and cups

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1047262/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1003656] Re: bridge-utils/vlan udev hooks prevent execution of upstart hook, slowing down boot

2012-09-09 Thread Steve Langasek
Stéphane,

>  * Start vlan-network-interface in the background to avoid blocking the
>rest of the udev events (most importantly the upstart one).
>(LP: #1003656)

This doesn't appear to be a correct fix.  I noticed here while working
on an unrelated boot issue that udev is now spitting warning messages
about these run rules not being valid, because udev tries to find a
helper with '&' in the name:

Sep  9 02:28:52 virgil udevd[1887]: failed to execute '/lib/udev/bridge-network-
interface&' 'bridge-network-interface&': No such file or directory
Sep  9 02:28:52 virgil udevd[1888]: failed to execute 
'/lib/udev/vlan-network-interface&' 'vlan-network-interface&': No such file or 
directory

So, reopening this report.

** Changed in: vlan (Ubuntu Quantal)
   Status: Fix Released => Triaged

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vlan in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003656

Title:
  bridge-utils/vlan udev hooks prevent execution of upstart hook,
  slowing down boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bridge-utils/+bug/1003656/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1031065] Re: cloud-init-nonet runs 'start networking' explicitly

2012-09-10 Thread Steve Langasek
Scott, can you please try a test package of mountall built from
lp:ubuntu/mountall?  I think I have both the mounting and mounted events
handled correctly there (and in my tests, seemingly faster).

Testing in scenarios other than the cloud boot case would also certainly
be helpful.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1031065

Title:
  cloud-init-nonet runs 'start networking' explicitly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1031065/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1031065] Re: cloud-init-nonet runs 'start networking' explicitly

2012-09-11 Thread Steve Langasek
The log for the container seems to show reasonable ordering for the
events.  It also shows:

cloud-init-nonet waiting 120 seconds for a network device.
cloud-init-nonet gave up waiting for a network device.
<6>init: cloud-init-nonet main process (31) exited normally
<6>init: cloud-init-nonet goal changed from start to stop
<6>init: cloud-init-nonet state changed from running to stopping
<6>init: Handling stopping event

However, this is a container so AFAICS there *isn't* a network interface
to be brought up.  Isn't that a different problem?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1031065

Title:
  cloud-init-nonet runs 'start networking' explicitly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1031065/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1031065] Re: cloud-init-nonet runs 'start networking' explicitly

2012-09-11 Thread Steve Langasek
Attaching plaintext console log.

** Attachment added: "console.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1031065/+attachment/3308428/+files/console.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1031065

Title:
  cloud-init-nonet runs 'start networking' explicitly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1031065/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1031065] Re: cloud-init-nonet runs 'start networking' explicitly

2012-09-11 Thread Steve Langasek
network-interface (lo) is the only interface job shown, so either
something is going wrong when bringing up this interface that prevents
/etc/network/if-up.d/upstart from emitting the static-network-up event,
or there are other network interfaces configured in
/etc/network/interfaces that have no corresponding udev events, but do
come up successfully in response to ifup -a.  Can you attach
/etc/network/interfaces from this container, for reference?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1031065

Title:
  cloud-init-nonet runs 'start networking' explicitly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1031065/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 1047262] Re: race condition on startup between samba and cups

2012-09-12 Thread Steve Langasek
>* Install winbind upstart configuration file with --upstart-only option
>for consistency with samba package.

Heh, this part is a wrong change. The upstart-only flag is for upstart
jobs which aren't replacing init scripts of the same name.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1047262

Title:
  race condition on startup between samba and cups

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1047262/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >