[Bug 1100177] [NEW] krb5-user security update uninstallable, depends on unavailable version of libkrb5-3
Public bug reported: After enabling precise-updates for universe, krb5-user is not installable. It depends on libkrb5-3 = 1.10+dfsg~beta1-2ubuntu0.3 but there is no such version in the repositories. precise# apt-cache policy krb5-user krb5-user: Installed: (none) Candidate: 1.10+dfsg~beta1-2ubuntu0.3 Version table: 1.10+dfsg~beta1-2ubuntu0.3 0 500 http://mirrors.nic.funet.fi/ubuntu/ precise-updates/universe amd64 Packages 1.10+dfsg~beta1-2 0 500 http://mirrors.nic.funet.fi/ubuntu/ precise/universe amd64 Packages precise# apt-cache showpkg krb5-user Package: krb5-user Versions: 1.10+dfsg~beta1-2ubuntu0.3 (/var/lib/apt/lists/mirrors.nic.funet.fi_ubuntu_dists_precise-updates_universe_binary-amd64_Packages) Description Language: File: /var/lib/apt/lists/mirrors.nic.funet.fi_ubuntu_dists_precise_universe_binary-amd64_Packages MD5: ca243064a3a71b9425feb54097e4dfd7 Description Language: en File: /var/lib/apt/lists/mirrors.nic.funet.fi_ubuntu_dists_precise_universe_i18n_Translation-en MD5: ca243064a3a71b9425feb54097e4dfd7 1.10+dfsg~beta1-2 (/var/lib/apt/lists/mirrors.nic.funet.fi_ubuntu_dists_precise_universe_binary-amd64_Packages) Description Language: File: /var/lib/apt/lists/mirrors.nic.funet.fi_ubuntu_dists_precise_universe_binary-amd64_Packages MD5: ca243064a3a71b9425feb54097e4dfd7 Description Language: en File: /var/lib/apt/lists/mirrors.nic.funet.fi_ubuntu_dists_precise_universe_i18n_Translation-en MD5: ca243064a3a71b9425feb54097e4dfd7 Reverse Depends: krb5-user:i386,krb5-user krb5-kdc,krb5-user openafs-kpasswd:i386,krb5-user krb5-user:i386,krb5-user sadms,krb5-user rsyslog-gssapi,krb5-user rdsserver,krb5-user openafs-kpasswd,krb5-user krb5-kdc,krb5-user freeipa-client,krb5-user libkrb5-3,krb5-user libkdb5-6,krb5-user libkadm5srv-mit8,krb5-user libkadm5clnt-mit8,krb5-user libk5crypto3,krb5-user libgssrpc4,krb5-user libgssapi-krb5-2,krb5-user Dependencies: 1.10+dfsg~beta1-2ubuntu0.3 - libc6 (2 2.14) libcomerr2 (2 1.01) libk5crypto3 (2 1.9+dfsg~beta1) libkadm5clnt-mit8 (0 (null)) libkadm5srv-mit8 (0 (null)) libkdb5-6 (0 (null)) libkrb5-3 (5 1.10+dfsg~beta1-2ubuntu0.3) libkrb5support0 (2 1.7dfsg~beta2) libss2 (2 1.01) krb5-config (0 (null)) heimdal-clients (0 (null)) heimdal-clients:i386 (0 (null)) krb5-user:i386 (0 (null)) 1.10+dfsg~beta1-2 - libc6 (2 2.14) libcomerr2 (2 1.01) libk5crypto3 (2 1.9+dfsg~beta1) libkadm5clnt-mit8 (0 (null)) libkadm5srv-mit8 (0 (null)) libkdb5-6 (0 (null)) libkrb5-3 (5 1.10+dfsg~beta1-2) libkrb5support0 (2 1.7dfsg~beta2) libss2 (2 1.01) krb5-config (0 (null)) heimdal-clients (0 (null)) heimdal-clients:i386 (0 (null)) krb5-user:i386 (0 (null)) Provides: 1.10+dfsg~beta1-2ubuntu0.3 - 1.10+dfsg~beta1-2 - Reverse Provides: precise# apt-cache policy libkrb5-3 libkrb5-3: Installed: (none) Candidate: 1.10+dfsg~beta1-2 Version table: 1.10+dfsg~beta1-2 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages precise# apt-get install --dry-run krb5-user Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: krb5-user : Depends: libkrb5-3 (= 1.10+dfsg~beta1-2ubuntu0.3) but 1.10+dfsg~beta1-2 is to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. ** Affects: krb5 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1100177 Title: krb5-user security update uninstallable, depends on unavailable version of libkrb5-3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/krb5/+bug/1100177/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1100177] Re: krb5-user security update uninstallable, depends on unavailable version of libkrb5-3
I imagine this may be a duplicate of bug #1100177 but it was rather messy so I opted to create a new bug report. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1100177 Title: krb5-user security update uninstallable, depends on unavailable version of libkrb5-3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/krb5/+bug/1100177/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1100177] Re: krb5-user security update uninstallable, depends on unavailable version of libkrb5-3
Turns out the problem was that I lacked the precise-updates repo for main. ** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1100177 Title: krb5-user security update uninstallable, depends on unavailable version of libkrb5-3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/krb5/+bug/1100177/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1039598] Re: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
Is this a duplicate of bug #1100177? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039598 Title: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/krb5/+bug/1039598/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1132526] Re: invaild encoding with .kr and .xn--3e0b707e domains
Additionally, the message from the old server is misleading. precise$ whois devunt.kr | less ... 湲 蹂대 UTF-8 몄⑸ 鍮ㅻ怨 듬. EUC-KR 몄 鍮ㅻ oldwhois.kisa.or.kr 鍮 怨 듬 . The above information is encoded with UTF-8 EUC-KR encoding WHOIS is being serviced in this URL:oldwhois.kisa.or.kr - KISA/KRNIC Whois Service - lines 42-57/57 (END) In fact, this is identical to the output if you query with -h oldwhois.kisa.or.kr; if you use -h whois.kisa.or.kr you do get correct UTF-8 output (and the same message in the footer). precise$ apt-cache policy whois whois: Installed: 5.0.15ubuntu2 Candidate: 5.0.15ubuntu2 Version table: *** 5.0.15ubuntu2 0 500 http://fi.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to whois in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1132526 Title: invaild encoding with .kr and .xn--3e0b707e domains To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/whois/+bug/1132526/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1132526] Re: invaild encoding with .kr and .xn--3e0b707e domains
(iconv tells me it cannot convert from EUC-KR to UTF-8 from the old input so I'm not sure if that's actually true, but the domain should be set up to use the new, well-defined server anyway.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to whois in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1132526 Title: invaild encoding with .kr and .xn--3e0b707e domains To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/whois/+bug/1132526/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1132526] Re: invaild encoding with .kr and .xn--3e0b707e domains
Upstream 5.0.23 fixed this issue. There is no separate upstream bug report. http://ftp- master.metadata.debian.org/changelogs/main/w/whois/unstable_changelog ** Changed in: whois (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to whois in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1132526 Title: invaild encoding with .kr and .xn--3e0b707e domains To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/whois/+bug/1132526/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 207686] [NEW] Wishlist: add new host keys to known_hosts without asking
Public bug reported: It's a usability problem that openss-client behaves differently the first time you connect to a host, particularly if you hop between client machines all the time and might or might not have connected from that particular client before. It would be an improvement if it would just silently add new hosts without asking. (I don't understand why it has to ask, anyway.) This silly question also dilutes the usefulness of the question about what to do when a known_hosts key has changed, which is important and has far-reaching security consequences. ** Affects: openssh (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: ui ** Tags added: ui -- Wishlist: add new host keys to known_hosts without asking https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207686 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 207686] Re: Wishlist: add new host keys to known_hosts without asking
** Description changed: - It's a usability problem that openss-client behaves differently the + Binary package hint: openssh-client + + It's a usability problem that openssh-client behaves differently the first time you connect to a host, particularly if you hop between client machines all the time and might or might not have connected from that particular client before. It would be an improvement if it would just silently add new hosts without asking. (I don't understand why it has to ask, anyway.) This silly question also dilutes the usefulness of the question about what to do when a known_hosts key has changed, which is important and has far-reaching security consequences. -- Wishlist: add new host keys to known_hosts without asking https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207686 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 207686] Re: Wishlist: add new host keys to known_hosts without asking
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 22:13:04 -, "Mathias Gug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 07:23:56PM -, era wrote: > > + It's a usability problem that openssh-client behaves differently > > the first time you connect to a host, particularly if you hop > > between client machines all the time and might or might not have > > connected from that particular client before. It would be an > > improvement if it would just silently add new hosts without > > asking. (I don't understand why it has to ask, anyway.) > > Keeping track of host fingerprints is one of the most important > component of the ssh architecture and is paramount in making sure the > ssh environment is secured. Oh, I quite agree. That's why I think the default should be to simply add keys as they are encountered, without asking. Perhaps my imagination is too limited, but I fail to come up with a common scenario where a regular user would seriously think about this question, let alone come up with a reason to not want to add a host key. (Maybe for localhost when you have a tunnel in place and really are connecting elsewhere; that would make sense. But then a newbie would not be able to predict the problem, and so would probably accept a key for localhost by routine as well.) > If you *really* want to disable the messages, you should look into > using the StrictHostKeyChecking option. Before doing so, make sure you > fully understand the roles of fingerprints and public keys in an ssh > infrastructure. The wishlist bug really asks for a facility for disabling the question without turning off strict checking. You should be able to enable strict checking and still have keys silently added. > status wontfix Please reconsider this. I think my request has some merit. /* era */ -- If this were a real .signature, it would suck less. Well, maybe not. -- Wishlist: add new host keys to known_hosts without asking https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207686 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 207686] Re: Wishlist: add new host keys to known_hosts without asking
Maybe this could be rephrased: add an alternative "StrictHostKeyChecking silent" and, ideally, make it the default. Like with "StrictHostKeyChecking no", add hosts silently; but still be strict when a key has changed, and refuse to connect. (The documentation is vague on this, and I'm too chicken to confirm my interpretation, but I take it "StrictHostKeyChecking no" will permit you to connect to a host whose key has changed.) -- Wishlist: add new host keys to known_hosts without asking https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207686 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 207686] Re: Wishlist: add new host keys to known_hosts without asking
> (The documentation is vague on this, and I'm too chicken to confirm my > interpretation, > but I take it "StrictHostKeyChecking no" will permit you to connect to a host > whose > key has changed.) Okay, I confirmed this under controlled conditions now. You do get a warning, with big old ugly marks around it, but in this particular case, the various login banners etc forced it off the screen, and I would probably not have noticed it if I hadn't been looking for it. -- Wishlist: add new host keys to known_hosts without asking https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207686 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 304388] [NEW] Gratuitous file /etc/samba/gdbcommands
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba-common The directory /etc/samba contains a spurious file gdbcommands which does not appear to be documented. To the extent that I am able to guess what it's for, it should probably simply be removed, or else documented e.g. in the /usr/share/doc/samba-common/README.Debian.gz file (which does not currently exist). http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=299919 hints that it may have been useful at some point, but I don't see any reference to it in /usr/share/samba/smb.conf or /etc/samba/smb.conf any longer (if there ever was one). vnix$ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 8.10 Release:8.10 vnix$ uname -m x86_64 vnix$ apt-cache policy samba-common samba-common: Installed: 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.3 Candidate: 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.3 Version table: *** 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.3 0 500 http://fi.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid-updates/main Packages 500 http://security.ubuntu.com intrepid-security/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3 0 500 http://fi.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages vnix$ apt-cache policy samba samba: Installed: (none) Candidate: 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.3 Version table: 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.3 0 500 http://fi.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid-updates/main Packages 500 http://security.ubuntu.com intrepid-security/main Packages 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3 0 500 http://fi.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Gratuitous file /etc/samba/gdbcommands https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/304388 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 55342] Re: Printing does not work: PID 23402 (/usr/lib/cups/backend/smb) crashed on signal 6
I'm taking the liberty to set this to Incomplete as the question from 2007 about whether this is still a problem has gone unanswered. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Incomplete -- Printing does not work: PID 23402 (/usr/lib/cups/backend/smb) crashed on signal 6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/55342 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 260424] Re: Incorrect hyperlink in samba-docs
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- Incorrect hyperlink in samba-docs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260424 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 267671] Re: bug of samba
The error message suggests that the fact that you have uninstalled Samba (possibly after removing its configuration file by hand?) might be the cause of the problem here. Could you try to completely purge it from your system, then reinstall? -- bug of samba https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267671 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 304388] Re: Gratuitous file /etc/samba/gdbcommands
I spent a lot of time investigating this, and would have avoided that if it had been documented. I'd still like to request the addition of a small snippet to README.Debian but since I'm an Ubuntu user I didn't want to take this directly upstream. If I submit this upstream, with a small patch, can I change this to "confirmed wishlist"? -- Gratuitous file /etc/samba/gdbcommands https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/304388 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 491791] [NEW] Incorrect server for .ae
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: whois I'm speculating the "Connection refused" means the server name in whois is wrong. There is a whois server at whois.aeda.net.ae which appears authoritative. They offer a web lookup at http://whois.aeda.net.ae/ as well. ubu...@ubuntu$ whois example.ae connect: Connection refused ubu...@ubuntu$ lsb_release -rd Description: Ubuntu 9.10 Release: 9.10 ubu...@ubuntu$ apt-cache policy whois whois: Installed: 4.7.34ubuntu2 Candidate: 4.7.34ubuntu2 Version table: *** 4.7.34ubuntu2 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.-com karmic/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ** Affects: whois (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Incorrect server for .ae https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491791 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to whois in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
