[uClinux-dev] libpthread

2009-01-20 Thread Michael Schnell
libpthread seems not to be available in the distr any more. Is this a 
glitch or am I missing something ?


-Michael
___
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev


Re: [uClinux-dev] libpthread

2009-01-20 Thread David McCullough

Jivin Michael Schnell lays it down ...
 libpthread seems not to be available in the distr any more. Is this a 
 glitch or am I missing something ?

It's part of uClibc,  providing you turn on the uClibc option for it
that is :-)

Cheers,
Davidm

-- 
David McCullough,  david_mccullo...@securecomputing.com,   Ph:+61 734352815
Secure Computing - SnapGear  http://www.uCdot.org   http://www.snapgear.com
___
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev


Re: [uClinux-dev] libpthread

2009-01-20 Thread Michael Schnell



It's part of uClibc,  providing you turn on the uClibc option for it
that is :-)
  

This option has gone since the latest update.

But I suppose it's just the distribution I'm using (NIOS) and the common 
uCLinux source code base is not affected.


Thanks,

-Michael
___
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev


Re: [uClinux-dev] openssl with hw-crypt engine IXP425 or lesslcryptlib

2009-01-20 Thread Siegfried Müller
David,

 Jivin Siegfried Müller lays it down ...
  Hi David,
  Jivin Siegfried Müller lays it down ...
   Hi,
  
   I currently using openswan with the OCF for the hw crypto engine
on 
   the ixp425. I want to use also openvpn. I compiled it with crypto

   and openvpn grows to 1MB. (without crypto
   ~240KB)
   Is there any possibility to use openssl also with OCF? How can i 
   reduce the size of openvpn with crypto?
  
  Depending on how you added OCF to your uClinux-dist,  you should  
  already have openssl(libcrypto) being accelerated by OCF.
  
  I selected OCF, cryptodev and IXP4XX in the Kernel Module 
  Settings. Is there anything else to do in the openssl config?
 
 openssl needs to be patched and have ocf-linux enabled with the:
 
   --with-cryptodev
 
 options.  Run openssl and type:
 
   OpenSSL engine
   (cryptodev) BSD cryptodev engine
   (dynamic) Dynamic engine loading support
   OpenSSL
 

I get:
OpenSSL engine
(dynamic) Dynamic engine loading support
(cswift) CryptoSwift hardware engine support
(chil) nCipher hardware engine support
(atalla) Atalla hardware engine support
(nuron) Nuron hardware engine support
(ubsec) UBSEC hardware engine support
(aep) Aep hardware engine support
(sureware) SureWare hardware engine support
(4758cca) IBM 4758 CCA hardware engine support

Do you have any idea why there is no IXP4xx?


 If cryptodev does show then you do not have OCF acceleration in
openssl. You need to get a patch from the OCF project for your
 openssl version.

I doesn't show cryptodev so I must have OCF acceleration, do I?


 Most of the SG dist will handle this if CONFIG_OCF_OCF is defined in
eth modules build.  You most likely have this.
 
  There is an OpenSSL patch included with OCF specifically for that, 
  then
  you just need to create the /dev/crypto node:
  
  mknod /dev/crypto c 10 70
  
  Is that patch already included in snapgear3.4 (i use 0.9.7m
OpenSSL)?
 
 The SG dist should also do that for you,  look in /dev/ on your target
for /dev/crypto
 
  How can I reduce the size of the libcrypto?
 
 I wish I knew :-), it's big and interdependent.
 
 The lib/libssl makefile has a good go at getting rid of a much as
possible.  Depending on your usage you may be able to disable some 
more algs etc.

 Otherwise look at use dropbear?? perhaps ?  Would be more work to
convert openvpn though,  someone may have already done it.

 Cheers,
 Davidm

Cheers,
Siegfried

-- 
David McCullough,  david_mccullo...@securecomputing.com,   Ph:+61
734352815
Secure Computing - SnapGear  http://www.uCdot.org
http://www.snapgear.com
___
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev

___
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev


Re: [uClinux-dev] openssl with hw-crypt engine IXP425 or lesslcryptlib

2009-01-20 Thread David McCullough

Jivin Siegfried Müller lays it down ...
 David,
 
  Jivin Siegfried Müller lays it down ...
   Hi David,
   Jivin Siegfried Müller lays it down ...
Hi,
   
I currently using openswan with the OCF for the hw crypto engine
 on 
the ixp425. I want to use also openvpn. I compiled it with crypto
 
and openvpn grows to 1MB. (without crypto
~240KB)
Is there any possibility to use openssl also with OCF? How can i 
reduce the size of openvpn with crypto?
   
   Depending on how you added OCF to your uClinux-dist,  you should  
   already have openssl(libcrypto) being accelerated by OCF.
   
   I selected OCF, cryptodev and IXP4XX in the Kernel Module 
   Settings. Is there anything else to do in the openssl config?
  
  openssl needs to be patched and have ocf-linux enabled with the:
  
  --with-cryptodev
  
  options.  Run openssl and type:
  
  OpenSSL engine
  (cryptodev) BSD cryptodev engine
  (dynamic) Dynamic engine loading support
  OpenSSL
  
 
 I get:
 OpenSSL engine
 (dynamic) Dynamic engine loading support
 (cswift) CryptoSwift hardware engine support
 (chil) nCipher hardware engine support
 (atalla) Atalla hardware engine support
 (nuron) Nuron hardware engine support
 (ubsec) UBSEC hardware engine support
 (aep) Aep hardware engine support
 (sureware) SureWare hardware engine support
 (4758cca) IBM 4758 CCA hardware engine support
 
 Do you have any idea why there is no IXP4xx?

You do not need any of those ;-)

  If cryptodev does show then you do not have OCF acceleration in
 openssl. You need to get a patch from the OCF project for your
  openssl version.
 
 I doesn't show cryptodev so I must have OCF acceleration, do I?

No cryptodev means no OCF patch or OCF not enabled with the
--with-cryptodev option for openssl.

Get the openssl patch from the ocf-linux project,  checkout the
README.sglinux and see how you go,

Cheers,
Davidm


  Most of the SG dist will handle this if CONFIG_OCF_OCF is defined in
 eth modules build.  You most likely have this.
  
   There is an OpenSSL patch included with OCF specifically for that, 
   then
   you just need to create the /dev/crypto node:
   
   mknod /dev/crypto c 10 70
   
   Is that patch already included in snapgear3.4 (i use 0.9.7m
 OpenSSL)?
  
  The SG dist should also do that for you,  look in /dev/ on your target
 for /dev/crypto
  
   How can I reduce the size of the libcrypto?
  
  I wish I knew :-), it's big and interdependent.
  
  The lib/libssl makefile has a good go at getting rid of a much as
 possible.  Depending on your usage you may be able to disable some 
 more algs etc.
 
  Otherwise look at use dropbear?? perhaps ?  Would be more work to
 convert openvpn though,  someone may have already done it.
 
  Cheers,
  Davidm
 
 Cheers,
 Siegfried
 
 -- 
 David McCullough,  david_mccullo...@securecomputing.com,   Ph:+61
 734352815
 Secure Computing - SnapGear  http://www.uCdot.org
 http://www.snapgear.com
 ___
 uClinux-dev mailing list
 uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
 http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
 This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
 To unsubscribe see:
 http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
 
 ___
 uClinux-dev mailing list
 uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
 http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
 This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
 To unsubscribe see:
 http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
 

-- 
David McCullough,  david_mccullo...@securecomputing.com,   Ph:+61 734352815
Secure Computing - SnapGear  http://www.uCdot.org   http://www.snapgear.com
___
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev


[uClinux-dev] [git pull] m68k and m68knommu merge of includes

2009-01-20 Thread Greg Ungerer

Hi Linus,

Please consider pulling this merge of the m68k and m68knommu include files.
It comepletely moves include/asm-m68k to arch/m68k/include as part of the
process, and ultimately results in both m68k and m68knommu arch code using
the same set of includes. More cleanup can follow, but this is the
necessary first step.

Thanks
Greg



The following changes since commit ae04d1401577bb63151480a053057de58b8e10bb:
  Benjamin Herrenschmidt (1):
powerpc: Fix cpufreq drivers after cpufreq core changes

are available in the git repository at:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gerg/m68knommu.git for-next

Sam Ravnborg (1):
  m68k,m68knommu: merge header files

 Makefile   |4 +++
 {include/asm-m68k = arch/m68k/include/asm}/Kbuild |0 
 arch/{m68knommu = m68k}/include/asm/MC68328.h |0 
 arch/{m68knommu = m68k}/include/asm/MC68332.h |0 
 arch/{m68knommu = m68k}/include/asm/MC68EZ328.h   |0 
 arch/{m68knommu = m68k}/include/asm/MC68VZ328.h   |0 
 .../m68k/include/asm}/a.out-core.h |0 
 .../asm-m68k = arch/m68k/include/asm}/a.out.h |0 
 .../asm-m68k = arch/m68k/include/asm}/adb_iop.h   |0 
 .../asm-m68k = arch/m68k/include/asm}/amigahw.h   |0 
 .../asm-m68k = arch/m68k/include/asm}/amigaints.h |0 
 .../asm-m68k = arch/m68k/include/asm}/amigayle.h  |0 
 .../asm-m68k = arch/m68k/include/asm}/amipcmcia.h |0 
 arch/{m68knommu = m68k}/include/asm/anchor.h  |0 
 .../asm-m68k = arch/m68k/include/asm}/apollodma.h |0 
 .../asm-m68k = arch/m68k/include/asm}/apollohw.h  |0 
 .../asm-m68k = arch/m68k/include/asm}/atafd.h |0 
 .../asm-m68k = arch/m68k/include/asm}/atafdreg.h  |0 
 .../m68k/include/asm}/atari_joystick.h |0 
 .../m68k/include/asm}/atari_stdma.h|0 
 .../m68k/include/asm}/atari_stram.h|0 
 .../asm-m68k = arch/m68k/include/asm}/atarihw.h   |0 
 .../asm-m68k = arch/m68k/include/asm}/atariints.h |0 
 .../asm-m68k = arch/m68k/include/asm}/atarikb.h   |0 
 arch/m68k/include/asm/atomic.h |5 +++
 .../atomic.h = arch/m68k/include/asm/atomic_mm.h  |0 
 .../asm/atomic.h = m68k/include/asm/atomic_no.h}  |0 
 arch/{m68knommu = m68k}/include/asm/auxvec.h  |0 
 arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops.h |5 +++
 .../bitops.h = arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops_mm.h  |0 
 .../asm/bitops.h = m68k/include/asm/bitops_no.h}  |0 
 .../asm-m68k = arch/m68k/include/asm}/blinken.h   |0 
 arch/m68k/include/asm/bootinfo.h   |5 +++
 .../m68k/include/asm/bootinfo_mm.h |0 
 .../bootinfo.h = m68k/include/asm/bootinfo_no.h}  |0 
 arch/{m68knommu = m68k}/include/asm/bootstd.h |0 
 arch/m68k/include/asm/bug.h|5 +++
 .../bug.h = arch/m68k/include/asm/bug_mm.h|0 
 .../asm/bug.h = m68k/include/asm/bug_no.h}|0 
 arch/m68k/include/asm/bugs.h   |5 +++
 .../bugs.h = arch/m68k/include/asm/bugs_mm.h  |0 
 .../asm/bugs.h = m68k/include/asm/bugs_no.h}  |0 
 .../m68k/include/asm}/bvme6000hw.h |0 
 arch/m68k/include/asm/byteorder.h  |5 +++
 .../m68k/include/asm/byteorder_mm.h|0 
 .../include/asm/byteorder_no.h}|0 
 arch/m68k/include/asm/cache.h  |5 +++
 .../cache.h = arch/m68k/include/asm/cache_mm.h|0 
 .../asm/cache.h = m68k/include/asm/cache_no.h}|0 
 .../asm-m68k = arch/m68k/include/asm}/cachectl.h  |0 
 arch/m68k/include/asm/cacheflush.h |5 +++
 .../m68k/include/asm/cacheflush_mm.h   |0 
 .../include/asm/cacheflush_no.h}   |0 
 arch/m68k/include/asm/checksum.h   |5 +++
 .../m68k/include/asm/checksum_mm.h |0 
 .../checksum.h = m68k/include/asm/checksum_no.h}  |0 
 arch/{m68knommu = m68k}/include/asm/coldfire.h|0 
 arch/{m68knommu = m68k}/include/asm/commproc.h|0 
 .../asm-m68k = arch/m68k/include/asm}/contregs.h  |0 
 .../asm-m68k = arch/m68k/include/asm}/cputime.h   |0 
 arch/m68k/include/asm/current.h|5 +++
 .../m68k/include/asm/current_mm.h  |0 
 .../current.h = m68k/include/asm/current_no.h}|0 
 arch/{m68knommu = m68k}/include/asm/dbg.h |0 
 arch/m68k/include/asm/delay.h  |5 +++
 .../delay.h = arch/m68k/include/asm/delay_mm.h|0 
 .../asm/delay.h = m68k/include/asm/delay_no.h}|0 
 arch/{m68knommu = m68k}/include/asm/device.h  |0 
 arch/m68k/include/asm/div64.h  |5 +++
 .../div64.h = arch/m68k/include/asm/div64_mm.h|0 
 .../asm/div64.h = m68k/include/asm/div64_no.h}|0 
 arch/m68k/include/asm/dma-mapping.h| 

[uClinux-dev] configuration files of rp-ppoe and pppd

2009-01-20 Thread Murat Sezgin
Hi,

When I look at these packages' makefiles, I can't see any codes that
installs the configuration files like pppoe.conf, options, pap-secrets,
chap-secrets to the romfs. Do we need to add these codes to the makefiles?
We are developing our own distribution, but we don't want to change the
default user applications in the uClinux distro.


Regards,
Murat
___
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev