Re: Running out of code points, redux (was: Re: Feedback on the proposal...)

2017-06-04 Thread David Starner via Unicode
On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 9:13 PM Martin J. Dürst via Unicode <
unicode@unicode.org> wrote:

> Sorry to be late with this, but if 20.1 bits turn out to not be enough,
> what about 21 bits?
>
> That would still limit UTF-8 to four bytes, but would almost double the
> code space. Assuming (conservatively) that it will take about a century
> to fill up all 17 (well, actually 15, because two are private) planes,
> this would give us another century.
>
> Just one more crazy idea :-(.
>

It seems hard to estimate the value of that, without knowing why we ran out
of characters. A slow collection of a huge number of Chinese ideographs and
new Native American scripts, maybe. Access to a library with a trillion
works over billions of years from millions of species, probably not. Given
that we're in no risk of running out of characters right now, speculating
on this seems pointless.


Re: Running out of code points, redux (was: Re: Feedback on the proposal...)

2017-06-04 Thread Martin J. Dürst via Unicode

On 2017/06/02 04:54, Doug Ewell via Unicode wrote:

Richard Wordingham wrote:


even supporting 6-byte patterns just in case 20.1 bits eventually turn
out not to be enough,


Sorry to be late with this, but if 20.1 bits turn out to not be enough, 
what about 21 bits?


That would still limit UTF-8 to four bytes, but would almost double the 
code space. Assuming (conservatively) that it will take about a century 
to fill up all 17 (well, actually 15, because two are private) planes, 
this would give us another century.


Just one more crazy idea :-(.

Regards,   Martin.