Re: New document.
Yung-Fong Tang wrote: could you point out which symbol in that two images need to be proposed? either by using red ciricle on the image or tell use the surrounding text. Thanks http://www.rz.uni-konstanz.de/Antivirus/tests/genealog/
Re: New document.
Dominikus Scherkl had written: Has anybody meanwhile contributed a proposal regarding the missing genealogical symbols ? (after Otto Stolz's message from 24.02.2003 I wondered this was not proposed long ago - or was it and was rejected for some reason?!?). So do I -- however, I am not in the position to author a formal proposition: I am not able to provide a font, and I do not have the time for a research beyond the evidence I have already given. Rick McGowan wrote: Do you have any documentation on these? The two scans under http://www.rz.uni-konstanz.de/Antivirus/tests/li.png http://www.rz.uni-konstanz.de/Antivirus/tests/re.png are from the authoritative (until July 1996) book on German orthography: Duden Rechtschreibung der deutschen Sprache und der Fremdwörter / hrsg. von d. Dudenred. auf d. Grundlage d. amtl. Rechtschreibregeln. [Red.Bearb.: Werner Scholze- Stubenrecht unter Mitw. von Dieter Berger ...]. - 19., neu bearb. u. erw. Aufl. ISBN: 3-411-20900-3. Best wishes, Otto Stolz
Re: New document.
Otto Stolz pointed to: http://www.rz.uni-konstanz.de/Antivirus/tests/li.png http://www.rz.uni-konstanz.de/Antivirus/tests/re.png Yes, some of those are worth proposing, I would say. The in-line textual usage is pretty well given by the two images. But someone needs to investigate the meanings and supply reasonable character names. Then fill out the proposal summary form and submit it. If someone does a proposal, that would be nice. It won't be me, since I don't have any access to the German sources and don't read German. For reference, Michael Everson recently did a very nice, succinct proposal for Guarani and Austral signs. You could use that proposal as a model. It was reviewed (and accepted) by UTC last week. Here is a pointer to the Guarani proposal: http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n2579.pdf Cheers, Rick
Re: New document.
Otto Stolz wrote: The two scans under http://www.rz.uni-konstanz.de/Antivirus/tests/li.png http://www.rz.uni-konstanz.de/Antivirus/tests/re.png are from the authoritative (until July 1996) book on German orthography: Duden Rechtschreibung der deutschen Sprache und der Fremdwörter / hrsg. von d. Dudenred. auf d. Grundlage d. amtl. Rechtschreibregeln. [Red.Bearb.: Werner Scholze- Stubenrecht unter Mitw. von Dieter Berger ...]. - 19., neu bearb. u. erw. Aufl. ISBN: 3-411-20900-3. Best wishes, Otto Stolz could you point out which symbol in that two images need to be proposed? either by using red ciricle on the image or tell use the surrounding text. Thanks
Re: New document.
Otto Stolz wrote:
The two scans under
http://www.rz.uni-konstanz.de/Antivirus/tests/li.png
http://www.rz.uni-konstanz.de/Antivirus/tests/re.png
are from the authoritative (until July 1996) book on German
orthography: Duden Rechtschreibung der deutschen Sprache
und der Fremdwörter / hrsg. von d. Dudenred. auf d. Grundlage
d. amtl. Rechtschreibregeln. [Red.Bearb.: Werner Scholze-
Stubenrecht unter Mitw. von Dieter Berger ...]. - 19., neu bearb.
u. erw. Aufl. ISBN: 3-411-20900-3.
Best wishes,
Otto Stolz
could you point out which symbol in that two images need to be proposed?
either by using red ciricle on the image or tell use the surrounding text.
Thanks
http://www.rz.uni-konstanz.de/Antivirus/tests/li.png
* geboren [born] -- asterisk, already encoded
(*) außerehelich geboren [born in wedlock] -- parentheses and
asterisk, already encoded
{ }* tot geboren [born dead] -- dagger and asterisk, already encoded
*{ } am Tag der Geburt gestorben [died on day of birth] -- asterisk
and dagger, already encoded
{ } getauft [baptized] -- could use U+3030 WAVY DASH
http://www.rz.uni-konstanz.de/Antivirus/tests/re.png
{ } verlobt [engaged] -- could use an existing circle character
{ } verheiratet [married] -- needs new symbol
{ } geschieden [divorced] -- needs new symbol
{ } außereheliche Verbindung [common law marriage ?] -- needs new symbol
{ } gestorben [died] -- dagger, already encoded
{ } gefallen [killed (in battle?)] -- needs new crossed swords symbol
{ } begraben [buried] -- needs new coffin symbol
{ } eingeäschert [cremated] -- needs new urn symbol
(although I suppose people could use one of the 29
new Linear B vessel ideograms to indicate just what
kind of urn they were buried in. ;-) )
--Ken
RE: New document.
Hello. N2579 Proposal to encode the GUARANI SIGN and the AUSTRAL SIGN in the UCS. Ah - by the way: Has anybody meanwhile contributed a proposal regarding the missing genealogical symbols ? (after Otto Stolz's message from 24.02.2003 I wondered this was not proposed long ago - or was it and was rejected for some reason?!?). Best regards. -- Dominikus Scherkl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New document.
Do you have any documentation on these? Rick Dominikus Scherkl wrote: Ah - by the way: Has anybody meanwhile contributed a proposal regarding the missing genealogical symbols ?
