[UC] Parklet

2011-08-17 Thread heronsinc


For the record, I don't like the looks of the parklet at 43rd and Baltimore either. It does indeed look "industrial" and not very inviting. I'm all in favor of new ways to develop public spaces (and I really like coffee-shops) but I have to say this project doesn't succeed. Al Airone


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
.


[UC] multi-color kitty seen around 47th Warrington - anyone know this cat?

2011-08-17 Thread Linda

forwarded:


From: jvalen...@aol.com
Date: August 16, 2011 8:50:06 PM EDT

I live in the 4700 block of Warrington Av.  A well groomed multi  
color cat, approx 1 yr old, and I think it is a female, has shown  
up. She is very friendly.   Is anyone missing a cat like this?


Thanks,
John Valentino


RE: [UC] Parklet

2011-08-17 Thread Karen Allen

I think the idea is a miss on a number of fronts. First, the name parklet (I 
use quotes because I don't like the conjured-up name) creates an expectation of 
sylvan greenery that is not met in the final product.  Call it what it 
is--outdoor seating.  As generic outdoor seating, it's functional, and looks 
OK. But giving it that particular name defeats its own purpose by inviting 
comparisons to a park, which it certainly is not.  
 
Second, the seating could work in locations that need recreation or relaxation 
space, but it should not be directly tied to any commercial enterprise. The 
miss here is instead of finding neutral locations, it's  been placed next to a 
business with an outdoor cafe; thus drawing accusations of favoritism in its 
placement. 
 
Here's a positive suggestion: the 45th/ Baltimore/Springfield  and 47th and 
Baltimore traffic triangles. They've both already been landscaped, and have 
enough space for small seating areas. 45th Street could be reconfigured mindful 
of pedestrian and auto traffic, and 47th is already fenced on the 47th Street 
side. They could help the overall 45th and 47th and Baltimore business strips 
without appearing to give favored treatment to any particular one.  And they 
could become  REAL parklets (without quotes!). 
 



Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 06:14:11 -0500
From: herons...@verizon.net
To: UnivCity@list.purple.com
Subject: [UC] Parklet


For the record, I don't like the looks of the parklet at 43rd and Baltimore 
either.  It does indeed look industrial and not very inviting.  I'm all in 
favor of new ways to develop public spaces (and I really like coffee-shops) but 
I have to say this project doesn't succeed.


 Al Airone
 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named 
UnivCity. To unsubscribe or for archive information, see .
 

Re: [UC] Parklet

2011-08-17 Thread UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN

On 8/17/11 11:49 AM, Karen Allen wrote:

I think the idea is a miss on a number of fronts. First, the name
parklet (I use quotes because I don't like the conjured-up name)
creates an expectation of sylvan greenery that is not met in the final
product. Call it what it is--outdoor seating. As generic outdoor
seating, it's functional, and looks OK. But giving it that particular
name defeats its own purpose by inviting comparisons to a park, which it
certainly is not.

Second, the seating could work in locations that need recreation or
relaxation space, but it should not be directly tied to any commercial
enterprise. The miss here is instead of finding neutral locations, it's
been placed next to a business with an outdoor cafe; thus drawing
accusations of favoritism in its placement.

Here's a positive suggestion: the 45th/ Baltimore/Springfield and 47th
and Baltimore traffic triangles. They've both already been landscaped,
and have enough space for small seating areas. 45th Street could be
reconfigured mindful of pedestrian and auto traffic, and 47th is already
fenced on the 47th Street side. They could help the overall 45th and
47th and Baltimore business strips without appearing to give favored
treatment to any particular one. And they could become REAL parklets
(without quotes!).





agreed.

the question here isn't about taste or aesthetics or (what was that 
fancy latin word, al?), but with whether or not these things are 
designed as truly public spaces. meaning: designed in response to actual 
public demand; designed in a standard way, like parking kiosks, so as to 
be recognized everywhere by the public as truly public spaces; designed 
so as to function independently of businesses; and designed without 
taking away anything that is already publicly paid for.




..
UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN













You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named UnivCity. To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
http://www.purple.com/list.html.