RE: [UC] Parklet
I think it is vital to understand the word "parklet"as a markerof fraud and propaganda. Who can possibly object to the concept of a cleaner safer baby park? This image is not simple minded semantics, and I think that point is very important for people to recognize! All the suggestions for alternativelocations thatyou and others have offered make much more sense for investment in small cozy spaces, when the government is running a surplus. But that is not the goal of this marketing "pilot" project. And if the people behind this wanted "green project investment" with Parks and street department money, I would add that all outdoor transit stops would first include shelter, seats, and plantings. Sheltered bus and trolley stops would greatly encourage "walkability" and use of public transit. But those city planners secretly pushing this, don't give a damn about thoughtful suggestions from caring citizens like us! A few years ago, an audit including half of Phila. recreation facilities revealed that 100% were in need of basic maintenance. If the taxpayers of Philadelphia found out that more Recreation money was beingplanned for the benefit of connected businesses in gentrified areas, they would be outraged at parklets! Looting the public treasury by plutocracy mobs is all around us. These people are dishonest and ruthless. The parklet cloak is a smoke screen intended for the powerful marketing machine to fool all of Philadelphia. Additionaly, terrified business owners and the tiny group of local gentrifiers can portray parklets as "green investments" and shout down everyone who dares to expose the con. That is why the city announced this "experiment" in our local paper while keeping their "brilliance" from city wide exposure! Depending on your point of view, you maysee "parklet" as a brilliant choice of word rather than the simple idiocy it appears to be! Why do you hate baby parks? Why do you hate improvement? Why do you hate successful neighborhoods? We've seen this tactic here before, when we were told that BIDS make us cleaner and safer for a few pennies. The excellent suggestions for parklets on the list are a testiment to citizen involvement! If the new cafe seating had anything to do with creating parklets, our suggestions are immensly better than these Penn/city experts. But this evolving plot at theft is a cruel and outrageous lie andnoneo the gentrifiers areinterested in suggestions for real baby parks! Glenn -Original Message- From: Karen AllenSent: Aug 17, 2011 11:49 AM To: UnivCity Listserv Subject: RE: [UC] Parklet I think the idea is amiss on a number offronts. First, the name "parklet" (I use quotes because I don't like the conjured-upname) creates anexpectationof sylvan greenery that is not metin the final product. Call it what it is--outdoor seating. As generic outdoor seating, it's functional, and looks OK. But giving it that particularname defeats its own purpose byinviting comparisons to a park, which it certainly is not. Second, the seating could work in locations that needrecreation or relaxation space, but it should not bedirectly tiedto anycommercial enterprise.The miss here is instead of finding neutral locations, it's been placed next to a business with an outdoor cafe; thus drawing accusations of favoritism in its placement.Here's a positive suggestion:the45th/ Baltimore/Springfield and 47th and Baltimore traffic triangles. They've both already been landscaped, and have enough space for small seating areas. 45th Streetcould bereconfiguredmindful ofpedestrian and auto traffic, and 47th is already fenced on the 47th Street side.They could help the overall 45th and 47th and Baltimore business stripswithout appearing to give favored treatment to any particular one. And theycould become REAL parklets (without quotes!). Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 06:14:11 -0500From: herons...@verizon.netTo: UnivCity@list.purple.comSubject: [UC] ParkletFor the record, I don't like the looks of the parklet at 43rd and Baltimore either. It does indeed look "industrial" and not very inviting. I'm all in favor of new ways to develop public spaces (and I really like coffee-shops) but I have to say this project doesn't succeed. Al Airone You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see .
Re: [UC] Re: Parking Spaces @ 43rd Baltimore
Summer All Ready wrote: Why such overreaction?Park-let is not a 'park'. it's an urban installation achieved by let.ing go of park.ing spaces, and turning them into temporary social.izing spaces [seats, benches...] Let's open our minds. yes, let's be open-minded about how to achieve public good without compromising public good, how to enact our current eco-consumerism without compromising our citizenship. park.letting in its present form lets select businesses capture public spaces. how is that just.ified beyond name.branding and eco.turfing and voo.doo.polling? http://dailyreporter.com/levelheaded/2011/07/15/parklets-are-for-the-bird-lets/ http://ebar.com/columns/column.php?sec=bbarticle=103 http://street.sfstation.com/2010/12/22/parklets-controversy/ .. UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named UnivCity. To unsubscribe or for archive information, see http://www.purple.com/list.html.
Re: [UC] Re: Parking Spaces @ 43rd Baltimore
Nobody would want to use that parklet other than customers of GreenLine. Lets just call a spade a spade. Urban Installation? -andy On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Summer All Ready archange...@hotmail.comwrote: Why such overreaction?Park-let is not a 'park'. it's an urban installation achieved by let.ing go of park.ing spaces, and turning them into temporary social.izing spaces [seats, benches...] Let's open our minds. It is better for its 'limited] longevity that it is next, or even in extension, to a commercial place, like a coffee shop, than 'on its own' somewhere where it could be vandalized overnight.
RE: [UC] Re: Parking Spaces @ 43rd Baltimore
??? Following the tread, people are obviously expressing 'concerns', or whatever is general negativity and resistance called, about the location of the installation. And installation in the city [thus urban] it is, like it or not, as are other, similar, smaller projects with limited durability. People, on the other hand, are free to call it whatever, in the process of familiarizing with these ideas. Let us be reminded that yes, these things might be all abuzz in UCity of Philly but they are not news to other cities [globally] and certainly not to urban and landscape planers, architects and designers, who created the term for the ease of communication some years ago. Ana Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 22:34:09 -0400 Subject: Re: [UC] Re: Parking Spaces @ 43rd Baltimore From: dill...@dillernet.com To: UnivCity@list.purple.com Nobody would want to use that parklet other than customers of GreenLine. Lets just call a spade a spade. Urban Installation? -andy On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Summer All Ready archange...@hotmail.com wrote: Why such overreaction?Park-let is not a 'park'. it's an urban installation achieved by let.ing go of park.ing spaces, and turning them into temporary social.izing spaces [seats, benches...] Let's open our minds. It is better for its 'limited] longevity that it is next, or even in extension, to a commercial place, like a coffee shop, than 'on its own' somewhere where it could be vandalized overnight.
RE: [UC] Re: Parking Spaces @ 43rd Baltimore
Mister, All there is in the bellow response is a good amount of irrational fear [not that fear is ever rational, but this is panic] and a senseless second paragraph resulting from an ill attempt to ridicule my sensible use of points within words to clarify meanings. Why that much negativity? How is one installation possibly compromising 'public good'? Whose 'current eco-consumerism' [speaking about labeling]? I have been working and living sustainability for more than thirty years. HOw about you? Living with better understanding of own surroundings and interdependency of living forms is a way of life, not consumerism. Nothing oriented towards ecological living could possibly 'compromise' your 'citizenship'. On the contrary. Let's just put an effort in being a little more positive. Best,Ana Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 13:16:44 -0400 From: laserb...@speedymail.org To: univcity@list.purple.com Subject: Re: [UC] Re: Parking Spaces @ 43rd Baltimore Summer All Ready wrote: Why such overreaction?Park-let is not a 'park'. it's an urban installation achieved by let.ing go of park.ing spaces, and turning them into temporary social.izing spaces [seats, benches...] Let's open our minds. yes, let's be open-minded about how to achieve public good without compromising public good, how to enact our current eco-consumerism without compromising our citizenship. park.letting in its present form lets select businesses capture public spaces. how is that just.ified beyond name.branding and eco.turfing and voo.doo.polling? http://dailyreporter.com/levelheaded/2011/07/15/parklets-are-for-the-bird-lets/ http://ebar.com/columns/column.php?sec=bbarticle=103 http://street.sfstation.com/2010/12/22/parklets-controversy/ .. UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named UnivCity. To unsubscribe or for archive information, see http://www.purple.com/list.html.