Re: [UC] DP continues on NIMBY shame
Glenn moyer wrote: He had an opportunity to consider this crap and know better than to write this crap. I spoke to the Wharton dude directly! Take a look at the crap: But I don' wanna READ crap! Don't make us read all the crap! You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named UnivCity. To unsubscribe or for archive information, see http://www.purple.com/list.html.
[UC] DP continues on NIMBY shame
Neighbors and hotel opponents, Check out today's installment which I've linked below. I spoke to this DP editor and the other executive editor last year. When I accused the PCPC and PHC of creating false records as recorded on public access TV, the pathetic report by the DP quoted me as shouting out, “you don’t live here.” That did not occur and they printed a retraction. Not only did I inform the two editors that this was not a NIMBY issue, I gave him information to investigate the truth, such as the link to the false records located on the PCPC web site. I explained that the hotel is a massive violation of existing zoning law. I informed him that many people have followed the entire pathetic coverage from the DP. I informed him that it is quite apparent that the DP is putting the one-sided coverage, the Campus Inn message, in a manner that shows that it is part of the spin machine. I was very clear that this type of coverage of a serious issue is either pathetic incompetent journalism or they do not have independence from the university. We’ve seen the Campus Inn press release as an editorial from the editorial board, the fake news reports; and now the one-sided reporting is being cloaked as this dude’s partial report, partial opinion. Both editors were incredibly defensive about their independence from the real estate business people who have completely taken over the U. They never followed up with me nor did they ever investigate and report the falsified records which I gave to them, in-person, in their offices. A big story waiting for legitimate journalists continues to sit waiting! He had an opportunity to consider this crap and know better than to write this crap. I spoke to the Wharton dude directly! Take a look at the crap: http://www.dailypennsylvanian.com/media/storage/paper882/news/2009/02/02/Opinion/David.Lei.another.Stitch.In.The.Seam-3607392.shtml You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named UnivCity. To unsubscribe or for archive information, see http://www.purple.com/list.html.
Re: [UC] DP continues on NIMBY shame
In a message dated 2/2/2009 2:19:26 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, glen...@earthlink.net writes: He had an opportunity to consider this crap and know better than to write this crap. I spoke to the Wharton dude directly! Take a look at the crap: You scared those kids and people in general. Over the Top Advocacy, even when you are right, does not engender a lot of support in decorous UC. What kind of Buddhist did you say you were? Ciao, Craig **Stay up to date on the latest news - from sports scores to stocks and so much more. (http://aol.com?ncid=emlcntaolcom0022)
Re: [UC] DP continues on NIMBY shame
You are right, Brian. I should post more of my songs to make up for the links to the DP. I wrote one a couple days ago which Tony inspired, I'm a Nut, For Nutty, Nutter I was hoping to save it for my upcoming birthday party that the FOCP throws for me each year at the statue of another leftist Aquarian, Chuckie Dickens. If you can't wait, I can post it for you. Do you think FOCP would consider adding Bob Marley's birthday, 2/6, for a whole weekend of Aquarian celebration I would call it the Moyer, Marley, Dickens, Weekend for World Peace and Revolution. Since Chuckie and Bob are dead, and i'm one of the livin, you'll have to make any arrangements with me. Sincerely, The leftist wanker of the unmoderated list -Original Message- From: Brian Siano briansi...@gmail.com Sent: Feb 2, 2009 2:36 PM To: Cc: univcity@list.purple.com Subject: Re: [UC] DP continues on NIMBY shame Glenn moyer wrote: He had an opportunity to consider this crap and know better than to write this crap. I spoke to the Wharton dude directly! Take a look at the crap: But I don' wanna READ crap! Don't make us read all the crap! You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named UnivCity. To unsubscribe or for archive information, see http://www.purple.com/list.html. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named UnivCity. To unsubscribe or for archive information, see http://www.purple.com/list.html.
Re: [UC] DP continues on NIMBY shame
"You scared those kids and people in general. Over the Top Advocacy, even when you are right, does not engender a lot of support in decorous UC." I think I scared them at first. But when I tried to bow to them before I left, they wanted to shake hands. Maybe I should have hugged and kissed them. Craig, you aren't scared of me, are you? Bowing low, Glenn -Original Message- From: craigso...@aol.com Sent: Feb 2, 2009 2:48 PM To: univcity@list.purple.com Subject: Re: [UC] DP continues on NIMBY shame In a message dated 2/2/2009 2:19:26 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, glen...@earthlink.net writes: He had an opportunity to consider this crap and know better than to write this crap. I spoke to the Wharton dude directly! Take a look at the crap: You scared those kids and people in general. Over the Top Advocacy, even when you are right, does not engender a lot of support in decorous UC. What kind of Buddhist did you say you were?Ciao, Craig Stay up to date on the latest news - from sports scores to stocks and so much more. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see .
Re: [UC] DP continues on NIMBY shame
Glenn moyer wrote: Check out today's installment which I've linked below. http://www.dailypennsylvanian.com/media/storage/paper882/news/2009/02/02/Opinion/David.Lei.another.Stitch.In.The.Seam-3607392.shtml if this hotel is such an obvious benefit to everyone (as this writer claims), such a pivotal part of penn's long-range vision for 40th street, why didn't the dp utter a single word about the planned hotel from the beginning? why did neighbors only first publicly hear about the hotel when the story broke in the university city review in october 2007? wouldn't the dp (or any other penn publication) have announced news about this wonderful hotel a year or so in advance of everyone else, like they've done for the other wonderful buildings along 40th street, like they're doing now for the wonderful transplant patient facility at 40th and spruce? .. UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named UnivCity. To unsubscribe or for archive information, see http://www.purple.com/list.html.
