Re: [UC] Scale and its adjudicators (Was: Re: Did anyone see this from the DP?)

2008-09-27 Thread UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN

Anthony West wrote:



SHCA's warrant doesn't reach east of 40th St.



false. it goes east to 38th street.

http://www.sprucehillca.org/map.html


the rest of your post, like phc and pcpc and shca, simply 
ignores the height and scale issue of the proposed hotel. 
the hotel's massive height and scale have been at the heart 
of the opposition to the hotel since the very beginning, and 
this opposition to the height and scale has been publicly 
voiced, again and again since 2007, in neighbors writing to 
uc review, the dp, and the city paper; it has been publicly 
demonstrated, repeatedly since 2007, in neighbors testifying 
at phc, pcpc, and shca's public meeting. indeed, the height 
and scale issue was so important that in dec 2007 the 
developer himself published distorted drawings of the hotel 
in an attempt to minimize the appearance of its actual 
height and bulk. and as recently as last week (sept 16) 
nilda ruiz and other members of pcpc acknowledged that the 
height and scale was 'overbearing', a 'shock' and a 
'problem', but that neighbors would 'get used to it'.


well, the neighbors have not gotten used to it, and the 
agencies involved have not gotten used to it. while the 
developer, with the help of penn, squeezes their hotel 
through the mayor's offices at city hall, the hotel's 
massive height and scale remains the elephant in the room. 
ignoring it each step of the way does not mean approval or 
support, in fact, the very attention and effort given to 
dismissing it is what's been so necessary to push it this far.


..
UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN



































































You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named UnivCity. To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
http://www.purple.com/list.html.


[UC] Scale and its adjudicators (Was: Re: Did anyone see this from the DP?)

2008-09-25 Thread Anthony West

Very, very interesting question, that deserves at least a stab at an answer.

Scale couldn't have much of an issue when the Campus Inn went before 
the Historical Commission. HC's reasoning is opaque to me, but in 
general it seems not to be a body that deals with scale. The HC is 
about the trees, not the forest: i.e., are your replacement windows of 
the same style as their 1898 original? Since the Campus Inn isn't in a 
City-recognized Historic District, the HC has no warrant to weigh the 
scale of an 11-story building on a block with 4-story buildings. So it 
didn't. It had to respect Campus Inn's vow to restore period details 
(who else wants to pay for them?); this created pressure on HC to cut 
the developer the economic slack needed to restore those precious 
mullions or whatever.


Scale might be a more pertinent concern for the Philadelphia City 
Planning Commission. I've no experience with its case rulings. However, 
old hands vaguely opine that its rulings tend to be processual and 
facilitative, rather than authoritarian and prohibitive: i.e., it likes 
developers to come up with Response B to Concern A, rather than just 
decreeing, Thou shalt not. And PCPC approaches neighborhoods from a 
citywide perspective. Since 40th St. already has several tall buildings 
on or near it, without much complaint, one more tall building might not 
look like a deal-breaker to these blokes.


Scale should peak in importance in the councils of the Spruce Hill 
Community Association. SHCA's warrant doesn't reach east of 40th St., so 
the opinions of neighbors there (who seem to be leaning pro-hotel) can't 
count for the Campus Inn. Not west of 40th St. was Mary Goldman's cry, 
and one that resonates in many University Citizens' hearts. The Woodland 
Terr. group, which is influential and well organized, has every right to 
appeal to fellow SHCA members for support on their concerns about scale.


Scale should matter supremely to the Zoning Board of Adjustment -- but 
with a narrow warrant. Its relevant boundaries are zoning patches rather 
than neighborhoods. When it comes to variances, ZBA considers a 
tightly-drawn radius that takes in Woodland Terr. to the south and the 
nearest highrise to the north, to confer on only these residents a 
special right to speak as neighbors. The rest of us are spectators, in 
theory. ZBA is, however, a political body and can be influenced by 
political actions.


-- Tony West


it's fascinating how, as far back as march, the dp was framing the 
question of the hotel in terms of parking.


and here we are now, with pcpc scheduling its hearings about the hotel 
in terms of parking.


what happened to the main issue: the hotel's massive scale and height 
and footprint?



..
UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN



You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named UnivCity. To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
http://www.purple.com/list.html.