Re: [UC] unsubscribe UnivCity
On 5/5/2011 12:40 AM, Richard Conrad wrote: P.S. I may be wrong but as I had read the rules for unsubscribing, you and some others did not actually do so... again, maybe I'm wrong and it may not be all that significant a point... but unsubscribe should be in the body and the email addressed to majordomo. Please let me know if I am correct, or not, about this. Thank You. Rick, This public unsubscribe started back with the catchment district fight for the Penn school. The catchment district was designed to closely resemble the SHCA historic district boundaries. Our so called community leaders didn't have time dealing with the deranged neighbors or civic associations outside of that boundary. They were too busy in back rooms! So they made a big deal of ignoring discussions on this public list. The public neighborhood listserv is one of the great threats to abuse of power. It is one of the internet tools, which gives people the greatest hope for using the internet to regain democracy, as well as quickly inform neighbors about neighborhood issues or threats. As West's ideology insists, good neighbors want controlled advertising for consumption. Good neighbors want censorship of neighborhood issues, so we have happy, happy, joy, joy while the experts control all neighborhood decisions! Censorship was used ubiquitously against the populations across the Arab world. Freedom of the press and speech is enshrined in the very first amendment for a good reason. But here is the song that good consumers sing. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABWyXKT5qt4 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named UnivCity. To unsubscribe or for archive information, see http://www.purple.com/list.html.
Re: [UC] unsubscribe UnivCity
On May 5, 2011, at 8:00 AM, Glenn wrote: On 5/5/2011 12:40 AM, Richard Conrad wrote: P.S. I may be wrong but as I had read the rules for unsubscribing, you and some others did not actually do so... again, maybe I'm wrong and it may not be all that significant a point... but unsubscribe should be in the body and the email addressed to majordomo. Please let me know if I am correct, or not, about this. Thank You. Rick, This public unsubscribe started back with the catchment district fight for the Penn school. The catchment district was designed to closely resemble the SHCA historic district boundaries. Our so called community leaders didn't have time dealing with the deranged neighbors or civic associations outside of that boundary. They were too busy in back rooms! So they made a big deal of ignoring discussions on this public list. 1- The public unsubscribe is usually done by people who have little Computer experience and, quite literally, have no idea how to unsubscribe 2- The catchment district: was gerrymandered by Councilwoman Blackwell's Office. The original district proposed by the Philadelphia School District was, in fact rectangular and based on population density. It was considerably smaller than the proposed historic district. The final district was warped into a very strange shape, making previously stable neighborhoods into rapidly gentrified ones as housing prices skyrocketed on homes within the catchment. ... and covers even less of the still only proposed Historic District. The creation of the Catchment area was a purely political process, orchestrated by our ELECTED political leaders, not community leaders. 3- the public unsubscribe from the purple list began long before the Penn Alexander School was proposed. In fact, most of the exodus occurred in the debate over the Historic District some 20+ years ago. T.T.F.N. William H. Magill mag...@mcgillsociety.org mag...@me.com whmag...@gmail.com You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named UnivCity. To unsubscribe or for archive information, see http://www.purple.com/list.html.
Re: [UC] unsubscribe UnivCity
On 5/5/11 1:56 PM, William H. Magill wrote: 1- The public unsubscribe is usually done by people who have little Computer experience and, quite literally, have no idea how to unsubscribe . . . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named UnivCity. To unsubscribe or for archive information, see http://www.purple.com/list.html. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named UnivCity. To unsubscribe or for archive information, see http://www.purple.com/list.html.
Re: [UC] unsubscribe UnivCity
Glenn is mistaken, if he believes that Tony West requested an unsubscribe, because it was Jennifer Rumain who posted message. Elliot M. Stern 552 South 48th Street Philadelphia, PA 19143-2029 United States of America telephone: 215-747-6204 mobile: 267-240-8418 emst...@verizon.net Begin forwarded message: From: Glenn glen...@earthlink.net Date: 05 May 2011 2:52:23 PM EDT To: William H. Magill mag...@mcgillsociety.org Cc: University City List univcity@list.purple.com Subject: Re: [UC] unsubscribe UnivCity Reply-To: Glenn glen...@earthlink.net Interesting opinions. Your posting style has greatly improved, Bill. But no, Tony West's unsubscribe is fake, as are many of the public unsubscribes we've seen. As long as committeeman7 is lurking in the slime, I'm quite certain that Tony will be around! Can anyone from the old UCCC explain why SHCA was not part of your organization? Was the catchment district done privately, as Bill suggests, by elected officials without input from SHCA and Penn partners? I heard that Councilwoman Blackwell was disobedient to Penn at that time?? I was busy fighting the FOCP, and don't know the details of this seemingly divisive catchment district debate. Was the catchment debate happy happy joy joy all around the UCD? Thanks for additional info, Glenn On 5/5/2011 1:56 PM, William H. Magill wrote: On May 5, 2011, at 8:00 AM, Glenn wrote: On 5/5/2011 12:40 AM, Richard Conrad wrote: P.S. I may be wrong but as I had read the rules for unsubscribing, you and some others did not actually do so... again, maybe I'm wrong and it may not be all that significant a point... but unsubscribe should be in the body and the email addressed to majordomo. Please let me know if I am correct, or not, about this. Thank You. Rick, This public unsubscribe started back with the catchment district fight for the Penn school. The catchment district was designed to closely resemble the SHCA historic district boundaries. Our so called community leaders didn't have time dealing with the deranged neighbors or civic associations outside of that boundary. They were too busy in back rooms! So they made a big deal of ignoring discussions on this public list. 1- The public unsubscribe is usually done by people who have little Computer experience and, quite literally, have no idea how to unsubscribe 2- The catchment district: was gerrymandered by Councilwoman Blackwell's Office. The original district proposed by the Philadelphia School District was, in fact rectangular and based on population density. It was considerably smaller than the proposed historic district. The final district was warped into a very strange shape, making previously stable neighborhoods into rapidly gentrified ones as housing prices skyrocketed on homes within the catchment. ... and covers even less of the still only proposed Historic District. The creation of the Catchment area was a purely political process, orchestrated by our ELECTED political leaders, not community leaders. 3- the public unsubscribe from the purple list began long before the Penn Alexander School was proposed. In fact, most of the exodus occurred in the debate over the Historic District some 20+ years ago. T.T.F.N. William H. Magill mag...@mcgillsociety.org mag...@me.com whmag...@gmail.com You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named UnivCity. To unsubscribe or for archive information, see http://www.purple.com/list.html. No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.894 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3617 - Release Date: 05/05/11 02:34:00
Re: [UC] unsubscribe UnivCity
Newcomers to University City who have inadvertently stumbled across this listserve, tricked by its name into thinking it somehow *represents the neighborhood of University City, *should be warned it is UNMODERATED. Therefore, there is no way of weeding out deranged and disruptive posts. UCNeighbors is a MODERATED neighborhood listserve. While everyone is permitted to post on it, deranged and disruptive posts are eventually screened out. That's the chief reason it has become more popular in our neighborhood than the purple list, in the past few years. No question, the talk is more sane there! You can sign up at ucneighb...@googlegroups.com. --Tony West
Re: [UC] unsubscribe UnivCity
You represented the UCNeighbors list on the UnivCity list so it seems appropriate to post your remarks here as well as there, Tony. It wouldn't hurt you to be honest and reply to Glenn's concerns as well as mine but you've refused to do so... You have ignored what you apparently could not answer and belittled the rest rather than debate honestly. My point about sales of park lands was a valid one and you must know that, if not you should check it out because you really ignored the facts in your emails. Whenever you are non-plussed you become abusive, disinterested, and haughty. Lots of good comments you ignored. Lists of concerns you represented as a single and inconsequential voice of unwarranted dissent. The uncensored UnivCity list here has a long history of your officious behavior for any one to peruse. When the segregated list first started out still under the University of Pennsylvania auspices, (as UnivCity still is) it was made to leave because it violated democratic precepts that the University had committed to. Asking you for fair treatment certainly hasn't changed things much. Feel free to change that any time treatment you want, but please no more calling others names (deranged, disruptive, source of nutty falsehoods, 'nefarious conspiracy theory', 'Trump-talk', etc.) and then saying it was all your opponent's fault because they abused the list. It's time to communicte. Enough Monty Python division crap for crap craziness! When they did it it was funny. This is not. Shake hands and come out talking! Rick Conrad On May 4, 2011, at 11:44 PM, Anthony West wrote: Newcomers to University City who have inadvertently stumbled across this listserve, tricked by its name into thinking it somehow represents the neighborhood of University City, should be warned it is UNMODERATED. Therefore, there is no way of weeding out deranged and disruptive posts. UCNeighbors is a MODERATED neighborhood listserve. While everyone is permitted to post on it, deranged and disruptive posts are eventually screened out. That's the chief reason it has become more popular in our neighborhood than the purple list, in the past few years. No question, the talk is more sane there! You can sign up at ucneighb...@googlegroups.com. --Tony West
Re: [UC] unsubscribe UnivCity
P.S. I may be wrong but as I had read the rules for unsubscribing, you and some others did not actually do so... again, maybe I'm wrong and it may not be all that significant a point... but unsubscribe should be in the body and the email addressed to majordomo. Please let me know if I am correct, or not, about this. Thank You. You represented the UCNeighbors list on the UnivCity list so it seems appropriate to post your remarks here as well as there, Tony. It wouldn't hurt you to be honest and reply to Glenn's concerns as well as mine but you've refused to do so... You have ignored what you apparently could not answer and belittled the rest rather than debate honestly. My point about sales of park lands was a valid one and you must know that, if not you should check it out because you really ignored the facts in your emails. Whenever you are non-plussed you become abusive, disinterested, and haughty. Lots of good comments you ignored. Lists of concerns you represented as a single and inconsequential voice of unwarranted dissent. The uncensored UnivCity list here has a long history of your officious behavior for any one to peruse. When the segregated list first started out still under the University of Pennsylvania auspices, (as UnivCity still is) it was made to leave because it violated democratic precepts that the University had committed to. Asking you for fair treatment certainly hasn't changed things much. Feel free to change that treatment any time you want, but please no more calling others names (deranged, disruptive, source of nutty falsehoods, 'nefarious conspiracy theory', 'Trump-talk', etc.) and then saying it was all your opponent's fault because they abused the list. It's time to communicte. Enough Monty Python division crap for crap craziness! When they did it it was funny. This is not. Shake hands and come out talking! Rick Conrad On May 4, 2011, at 11:44 PM, Anthony West wrote: Newcomers to University City who have inadvertently stumbled across this listserve, tricked by its name into thinking it somehow represents the neighborhood of University City, should be warned it is UNMODERATED. Therefore, there is no way of weeding out deranged and disruptive posts. UCNeighbors is a MODERATED neighborhood listserve. While everyone is permitted to post on it, deranged and disruptive posts are eventually screened out. That's the chief reason it has become more popular in our neighborhood than the purple list, in the past few years. No question, the talk is more sane there! You can sign up at ucneighb...@googlegroups.com. --Tony West
[UC] unsubscribe UnivCity
Re: [UC] unsubscribe UnivCity
I mourn the loss of thousands of precious lives, but I will not rejoice in the death of one, not even an enemy. Returning hate for hate multiplies hate, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness: only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate: only love can do that — Martin Luther King Jr On May 2, 2011, at 10:03 AM, Jennifer Rumain wrote:
[UC] unsubscribe univCity
unsubscribe UnivCity You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named UnivCity. To unsubscribe or for archive information, see http://www.purple.com/list.html.
