[Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2

2009-06-15 Thread Rashad Tatum
Please change the targeted upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0.

-- 
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2

2009-06-09 Thread Richard Ayotte
Fedora 11 uses 3.4.2.

http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f11/en-US/sect-
Release_Notes-Eclipse.html

-- 
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2

2009-06-08 Thread karl michael
i use the latest version of eclipse in Ubuntu 8.04
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=941461highlight=eclipse

-- 
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


Re: [Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2

2009-06-08 Thread Rashad Tatum
Thanks for the information Karl, but this bug report is about packaging the
latest stable version of Eclipse.

On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:10 PM, karl michael
karl.1mich...@gmail.comwrote:

 i use the latest version of eclipse in Ubuntu 8.04
 http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=941461highlight=eclipse

 --
 Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.

 Status in “eclipse” source package in Ubuntu: Confirmed
 Status in “eclipse” source package in Baltix: New
 Status in “eclipse” source package in Debian: New

 Bug description:
 Binary package hint: eclipse

 Eclipse 3.4.2 is now out


-- 
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2

2009-06-03 Thread TAC one
Hello, seems like Mandriva ships the latest version of eclipse.

http://qense.nl/eclipse-34-on-ubuntu-is-tricky-but-possible/comment-
page-1#comment-6291

Being Mandriva based on Ubuntu couldn't Debian/Ubuntu grab the package
from them or join forces ?

-- 
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2

2009-06-03 Thread Matteo Settenvini
Mandriva isn't based on Ubuntu at all (Mandriva is a new name for
Mandrake, which in turn is based on Red Hat, and both are older than
Ubuntu).

Mandriva also uses RPMs whereas Ubuntu uses deb packages, and packaging
guidelines are quite different, so one of Debian or Ubuntu will have to
package Eclipse by themselves (thanks to some volunteers, of course).

-- 
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2

2009-05-26 Thread Matthias Klose
Status know, package isn't maintained in Debian anymore. Updating to a
new package version requires some effort. If somebody does want to start
this, please get in contact on the ubuntu-devel ML.

The current packaging in the PPA isn't suited for upload to
karmic/universe.

As long as the package is available in Debian, it should not be removed
in Ubuntu. Blacklisting for syncs doesn't seem to be appropriate.

-- 
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2

2009-05-26 Thread Dominic Evans
Matthias: can you work on fixing bug 312824 (i.e., sponsoring the move
of jetty from contrib to main) so that someone can actually get started
on decent eclipse packaging?

-- 
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2

2009-05-22 Thread Rashad Tatum
I would like to help.

-- 
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2

2009-05-19 Thread Luca Saba
I'd like too! Ready to learn!

-- 
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


Re: [Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2

2009-05-19 Thread pkt
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Luca Saba lucas...@gmail.com wrote:
 I'd like too! Ready to learn!

Testing is great but what is missing right now is someone with enough free time
to do the actual work. I 'll hopefully have some free time in the beginnings of
July but not before.

-- 
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2

2009-05-15 Thread James Tocknell
I'm be willing to do testing, but I know nothing about Java or
packaging.

-- 
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2

2009-04-28 Thread Hew McLachlan
** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: eclipse
  
- Eclipse 3.4.2 is now out - maybe we could see this in Karmic?
- 
- [was: Eclipse 3.3/3.4/3.4.1 is out, maybe we could see this in
- Gutsy/Intrepid/Jaunty?]
+ Eclipse 3.4.2 is now out

-- 
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


Re: [Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2

2009-04-28 Thread pkt
Well, why not aim for 3.5 instead?  It is not like the work required
to get 3.4.x in shape is any less, or that it would
be finished before 3.5 is out anyway. (Of course that is just imho).

-- 
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2

2009-04-27 Thread Eugene Kapun
** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: eclipse
  
- Eclipse 3.4.2 is now out - maybe we could see this in Jaunty?
+ Eclipse 3.4.2 is now out - maybe we could see this in Karmic?
  
  [was: Eclipse 3.3/3.4/3.4.1 is out, maybe we could see this in
- Gutsy/Intrepid?]
+ Gutsy/Intrepid/Jaunty?]

-- 
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2

2009-04-21 Thread Dominic Evans
Glad to see this is being proposed as blueprint foundations-karmic-
eclipse-update for karmic

https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/foundations-karmic-
eclipse-update

-- 
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2

2009-04-21 Thread Dominic Evans
I actually really like the example packages in the PPA from ~yogarine,
quite an interesting idea to package in this way

-- 
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2

2009-04-17 Thread Oli
We're quickly approaching two years since this bug was launched, many
people have said things but nothing has come from it to get a proper
package-build-process started. Considering how many developers use
Eclipse (for so many different things), I would have put money on this
being fixed 18 months ago... And I would have lost.

So apart from people randomly assigning this to random groups
(Medibuntu? wtf?!), what's going on? People appear to be taking this on,
finding it doesn't build and eventually giving up. Is there any way we
can elevate this from a community bug to a proper Canonical we can't
release Karmic with E3.2 bug?

Because shipping Eclipse 3.2 in Intrepid and Jaunty is a complete joke.
Shipping it in Karmic is just lazy. If we can't do it as a community,
lets get Canonical and Sun talking to resolve this issue before we start
getting laughed at.

-- 
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2

2009-04-17 Thread Caesar
Oli, I think the reason this will never be done is really simple: not
having elcipse package is not a problem.

At all.

It's really easy to install eclipse manually, It have it's own internal
update, plugins installation and dependency resolving system. Same time,
any external update and plugins installation are complex, unreliable
and... just never worse the time spent on them vs. simplicity of eclipse
manual installation and self-update.

Who want to kill days or even weeks on the problem that can be solved in
other way in 5 minutes?

Just forget about the eclipse package. Anyone who need it will be able
to install manually.

-- 
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2

2009-04-17 Thread aurelieng
Well... IMHO, the own internal update, plugin installation and
dependency resolving system is not that reliable. I cannot count the
number of problems and workarounds I had trying to install several
plugins with different (and incompatible) dependencies. It's so painful
that most plugin editors also release a version of their plugin bundled
with eclipse, to avoid its integration if you want to give it a try.

Also, I think that when you are a part-time developper, being able to
install your workspace from clean distribution package, if you want, is
a real advantage since you can focus on your job, and not on system
administration/maintainance tasks.

What's the status of other major distribution ? Most of them ship
Ganymede (3.4)... so it seems to be feasible... or maybe I missed
something ?

-- 
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


Re: [Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2

2009-04-17 Thread Martin
Somebody's working on it: https://launchpad.net/~eclipse-team/+archive/ppa
One could say that it isn't difficult to install eclipse manually, but imho
it's bad
school of thought: one could say that about 70% of software.

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Oli o...@thepcspy.com wrote:

 We're quickly approaching two years since this bug was launched, many
 people have said things but nothing has come from it to get a proper
 package-build-process started. Considering how many developers use
 Eclipse (for so many different things), I would have put money on this
 being fixed 18 months ago... And I would have lost.

 So apart from people randomly assigning this to random groups
 (Medibuntu? wtf?!), what's going on? People appear to be taking this on,
 finding it doesn't build and eventually giving up. Is there any way we
 can elevate this from a community bug to a proper Canonical we can't
 release Karmic with E3.2 bug?

 Because shipping Eclipse 3.2 in Intrepid and Jaunty is a complete joke.
 Shipping it in Karmic is just lazy. If we can't do it as a community,
 lets get Canonical and Sun talking to resolve this issue before we start
 getting laughed at.

 --
 Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.

 Status in “eclipse” source package in Ubuntu: Confirmed
 Status in “eclipse” source package in Baltix: New
 Status in “eclipse” source package in Debian: New

 Bug description:
 Binary package hint: eclipse

 Eclipse 3.4.2 is now out - maybe we could see this in Jaunty?

 [was: Eclipse 3.3/3.4/3.4.1 is out, maybe we could see this in
 Gutsy/Intrepid?]



-- 
M. Modrzejewski

-- 
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


Re: [Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2

2009-04-17 Thread Oli
Caesar, that's really dangerous thinking there. Those same arguments could
be levelled against lots of other mature apps that have their own
ecosystems... Surely you wouldn't suggest not packaging (for example)
Firefox?

We use packages for a good reason: it keeps things sturdy and constant
between similar machines and results in a standardised install process you
can script for any machine. It also, psychologically speaking, instils an
ethos of installing things from a trusted source. Downloading things from
all-over the internet is one reason why the security landscape is so mired
on Windows.

You might try and say that Eclipse appeals to a different audience but
looking at Add/Remove, it's is one of the most popular packages in the
package popularity contest for the Programming section, only beaten outright
by Python (for obvious reasons). People want it and they want to get it from
Ubuntu's repositories.

I don't deny that downloading and untarring Eclipse from eclipse.org works
but that's not the point. Eclipse is major software that thousands (if not
millions) of people use. It's a waste of time doesn't seem like a valid
argument.

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Caesar gaius.jul...@gmail.com wrote:

 Oli, I think the reason this will never be done is really simple: not
 having elcipse package is not a problem.

 At all.

 It's really easy to install eclipse manually, It have it's own internal
 update, plugins installation and dependency resolving system. Same time,
 any external update and plugins installation are complex, unreliable
 and... just never worse the time spent on them vs. simplicity of eclipse
 manual installation and self-update.

 Who want to kill days or even weeks on the problem that can be solved in
 other way in 5 minutes?

 Just forget about the eclipse package. Anyone who need it will be able
 to install manually.

 --
 Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.


-- 
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2

2009-04-17 Thread Caesar
do you expect apt to be more reliable in installing eclipse and its
numerous plugins than eclipse itself?

When I need my workspace on the clean machine I simply unpack my eclipse
installation with all its plugins. It is easier than installing
everything with apt and it is easier than fresh eclipse install and then
plugins install with internal installer.

And I don't need to configure tons of tiny things for every plugin.

Apt and eclipse can live together only when all plugins will have
their's own debs maintained by plugin's developers. In any other case
you'll have eventually install something through eclipse's internal
installer which is bad. Not because it's just bad but because you will
have two managers - apt and eclipse messing with the same software. You
will never be sure which way to use next time because one will work
better for one set of lugins and other will work for some other set, and
you will never know who's responsible of the failure - plugin creator,
eclipse, or repo package maintainer.

-- 
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


Re: [Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2

2009-04-17 Thread Alwin Garside
I made my own packages of Eclipse and a bunch of plugins using the
release tarballs from eclipse.org:
https://edge.launchpad.net/~yogarine/+archive/ppa

I did this because from my experience installing Eclipse and then
installing all the plugins you want is always a big hassle that can
take up a whole hour. Why go to all that trouble if you can just type:

sudo apt-get install eclipse-pdt

Just give my ppa a try and I'm sure you'll like the idea.

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Oli o...@thepcspy.com wrote:
 Caesar, that's really dangerous thinking there. Those same arguments could
 be levelled against lots of other mature apps that have their own
 ecosystems... Surely you wouldn't suggest not packaging (for example)
 Firefox?

 We use packages for a good reason: it keeps things sturdy and constant
 between similar machines and results in a standardised install process you
 can script for any machine. It also, psychologically speaking, instils an
 ethos of installing things from a trusted source. Downloading things from
 all-over the internet is one reason why the security landscape is so mired
 on Windows.

 You might try and say that Eclipse appeals to a different audience but
 looking at Add/Remove, it's is one of the most popular packages in the
 package popularity contest for the Programming section, only beaten outright
 by Python (for obvious reasons). People want it and they want to get it from
 Ubuntu's repositories.

 I don't deny that downloading and untarring Eclipse from eclipse.org works
 but that's not the point. Eclipse is major software that thousands (if not
 millions) of people use. It's a waste of time doesn't seem like a valid
 argument.

 On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Caesar gaius.jul...@gmail.com wrote:

 Oli, I think the reason this will never be done is really simple: not
 having elcipse package is not a problem.

 At all.

 It's really easy to install eclipse manually, It have it's own internal
 update, plugins installation and dependency resolving system. Same time,
 any external update and plugins installation are complex, unreliable
 and... just never worse the time spent on them vs. simplicity of eclipse
 manual installation and self-update.

 Who want to kill days or even weeks on the problem that can be solved in
 other way in 5 minutes?

 Just forget about the eclipse package. Anyone who need it will be able
 to install manually.

 --
 Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.


 --
 Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.



-- 
Alwin Garside
Email: yogar...@gmail.com
Blog: http://www.yogarine.net
Twitter: http://twitter.com/yogarine
MSN: yogar...@msn.com
Skype: yogarine
Phone: +31 (0)23 8442699
Mobile: +31 (0)6 49 748 424

-- 
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2

2009-04-17 Thread Sergiy Zuban
are there some technical issues that doesn't allow to install core of
eclipse via apt (and keep it updated when new releases of eclipse
occurs) and let the end user to install plugins via eclipse's build-in
mechanisms? I don't understand why you are packaging let's say perl +
tons of modules (the same I can say regarding php/python/ruby, etc) when
it has own module manager called cpan. If someone need to update
module (installed via apt) or install new module (not packages as .deb)
he is able to do that via cpan and everything works fine, because such
modules installs to /usr/local/lib and they have higher priority. Why
you can't do the same with eclipse?

-- 
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


Re: [Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2

2009-04-17 Thread pkt
Fwiw:

1) The statement that eclipse doesn't need packaging and it is trivial
to install standalone is imho *a joke*.
The fact is, eclipse *does* have dependencies on other stuff that is
installed via the package system
(by far the most painful of which is, of course, mozilla/xulrunner).

Packaging eclipse hopefully makes packagers responsible for making
sure the installed versions of these
dependencies are appropriate and won't cause problems (e.g., see the
current bugs in fedora/debian
where eclipse doesn't even start because the mozilla guys decided to
change their API once more.
Those are the kinds of problems that packaging is supposed to fix).

2) The hardest technical issue for packaging, is by far the eclipse
build system. My package released
in christmas (based on the fedora package) proved that it is indeed
possible to get something that works
(even with eclipse's new update/provisioning system, P2) but the size
of packaging scripts and the number
of patches that had to be applied to get things to work *almost*
reasonably, shows this path is unfortunately
unmaintainable in the long run. Even the Fedora/Redhat guys seem to be
concerned with that issue.

The linuxdistros eclipse project is working on a saner build system
for eclipse (called eclipse-build)
and rockwalrus has worked on a slightly different build system too
(that I like a bit better). If you are
really interested in seeing recent eclipse in shape for debian/ubuntu
and are reasonably well versed
in java/ant, you should really consider helping those efforts.

There are also policy issues imho: E.g., should the osgi framework
(equinox) be provided separately?
(it is already used standalone by a few people). What should we do
with the shared libraries?

Other issues are simple but tedious stuff like packaging and pushing
all the dependencies
in a form that are usable by eclipse (at least an OSGified Manifest.MF).

I have filed bugs for lots of the subtasks I could think of in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/eclipse-debian
My source has also been public from the beginning and is in a
gitorious repository (eclipse-debian)*
rockwalrus also has the eclipse-ubuntu effort.

So, currently it seems nobody has the needed free time (I know I
don't) to finish the job. But if everyone
contributing complaints to this bug had invested a few hours to solve
one of the documented subproblems,
eclipse would be pretty ok by now ;)

*git://gitorious.org/eclipse-debian/mainline.git

-- 
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


Re: [Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2

2009-04-17 Thread Micah Gersten
Caesar wrote:
 do you expect apt to be more reliable in installing eclipse and its
 numerous plugins than eclipse itself?

 When I need my workspace on the clean machine I simply unpack my eclipse
 installation with all its plugins. It is easier than installing
 everything with apt and it is easier than fresh eclipse install and then
 plugins install with internal installer.

 And I don't need to configure tons of tiny things for every plugin.

 Apt and eclipse can live together only when all plugins will have
 their's own debs maintained by plugin's developers. In any other case
 you'll have eventually install something through eclipse's internal
 installer which is bad. Not because it's just bad but because you will
 have two managers - apt and eclipse messing with the same software. You
 will never be sure which way to use next time because one will work
 better for one set of lugins and other will work for some other set, and
 you will never know who's responsible of the failure - plugin creator,
 eclipse, or repo package maintainer.

   
You could make this same argument for Firefox with the myriad plugins,
but it's still packaged.  Some plugins with .deb packages and some as .xpi

There is a difference between the two in that the .deb packages are
systemwide whereas the .xpi are for the user only.  This was one of the
main issues brought up earlier in this thread.  A mutli-user system
needs at least the base eclipse installation if not all the necessary
plugins to be global so only one copy is needed on the system.

-- 
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2

2009-04-17 Thread Alwin Garside
@Sergiy Zuban:
No there are no technical limitations to having mixed system-wide eclipse 
updated through apt and local plugins installed through Eclipse's Update 
Manager.

I have done lots of test with the packages in my PPA and in all cases
things just work perfectly. The approach I took was to use Eclipse 3.4's
dropins folder to install eclipse plugins system-wide in .debs.

-- 
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 123064] Re: Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2

2009-03-01 Thread LumpyCustard
** Summary changed:

- Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.1
+ Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2

** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: eclipse
  
- Eclipse 3.4.1 is now out - maybe we could see this in Jaunty?
+ Eclipse 3.4.2 is now out - maybe we could see this in Jaunty?
  
- [was: Eclipse 3.3/3.4 is out, maybe we could see this in
+ [was: Eclipse 3.3/3.4/3.4.1 is out, maybe we could see this in
  Gutsy/Intrepid?]

-- 
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs