[Ur] Need help with UPO: Ckeditor, Fail: Can't find variable: CKEDITOR?

[Jeevjyot Chhabda]

Greetings all,

I am trying to execute Ckeditor example of UPO, it successfully compiles and 
creates an exe but when i try to run,

I get error: "Fail: Can't find variable: CKEDITOR”

I made few changes to the original files, here is

ckbasic.ur

fun main () = return 
  


ckbasic.urp

library ../

ckbasic

ckbasic.urs

val main : unit -> transaction page

Rest the library is just same as uploaded on the Github.

Here is the link to the complete project 
https://github.com/JeevFresno/CkEditorUrweb 


I can’t figure where i am going wrong? 

thanks,

Jeevjyot 


___
Ur mailing list
Ur@impredicative.com
http://www.impredicative.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ur

Re: [Ur] Ur/Web people organizer: editable table with fixed (hidden) field?

[Ziv Scully]

Am I correct in thinking that you basically want something like
InputStrings's "const" and "given" parameters, but for EditableTable?


On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 13:03 Marko Schütz Schmuck <
markoschu...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 12:18:59 -0400,
> Adam Chlipala wrote:
> >
> > If the "user" field is not editable, how do you choose which user to
> associate with a new row?
>
> I was thinking that it could be a transaction argument to the widget
> function like
>
> ...
> val widgets = {User = sinkWidget (getCookie userC), ...}
>
> alternatively maybe it should be another part of the struct passed to
> the EditableTable.Make functor like "permission"?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marko
>
> > On 04/11/2017 12:10 PM, Marko Schütz Schmuck wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 10:58:31 -0400,
> > Adam Chlipala wrote:
> >
> > OK, so you don't want to support adding or deleting rows, just
> editing the ones that
> > already exist?  I'm not sure UPO has something like that right
> now, but I'd need to look
> > through the code again to be sure.
> >
> > No, no: adding and deleting are required too. It's just that I want
> to
> > have the User field not editable. A "sink widget" that does not
> > display but can be assigned as the widget of a field might work? The
> > field would still be in the records and be stored in the table.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Marko
> >
> > On 04/10/2017 04:14 PM, Marko Schütz Schmuck wrote:
> >
> > I was wondering whether the tools available in UPO are
> already
> > sufficient to cover the following:
> >
> > I have a table where each user can register several tuples.
> For now,
> > I'd like to present it as an editable table where the field
> User is
> > not editable (not even visible) and will be constants for
> all tuples
> > entered by that user.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Marko
> >
> > ___
> > Ur mailing list
> > Ur@impredicative.com
> > http://www.impredicative.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ur
> >
> > ___
> > Ur mailing list
> > Ur@impredicative.com
> > http://www.impredicative.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ur
> >
> >
> > [2  ]
> > ___
> > Ur mailing list
> > Ur@impredicative.com
> > http://www.impredicative.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ur
> ___
> Ur mailing list
> Ur@impredicative.com
> http://www.impredicative.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ur
>
___
Ur mailing list
Ur@impredicative.com
http://www.impredicative.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ur

Re: [Ur] Ur/Web people organizer: editable table with fixed (hidden) field?

[Adam Chlipala]

If the "user" field is not editable, how do you choose which user to 
associate with a new row?


On 04/11/2017 12:10 PM, Marko Schütz Schmuck wrote:

On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 10:58:31 -0400,
Adam Chlipala wrote:

OK, so you don't want to support adding or deleting rows, just editing the ones 
that
already exist?  I'm not sure UPO has something like that right now, but I'd 
need to look
through the code again to be sure.

No, no: adding and deleting are required too. It's just that I want to
have the User field not editable. A "sink widget" that does not
display but can be assigned as the widget of a field might work? The
field would still be in the records and be stored in the table.

Best regards,

Marko


On 04/10/2017 04:14 PM, Marko Schütz Schmuck wrote:

I was wondering whether the tools available in UPO are already
sufficient to cover the following:

I have a table where each user can register several tuples. For now,
I'd like to present it as an editable table where the field User is
not editable (not even visible) and will be constants for all tuples
entered by that user.

Best regards,

Marko

___
Ur mailing list
Ur@impredicative.com
http://www.impredicative.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ur


___
Ur mailing list
Ur@impredicative.com
http://www.impredicative.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ur


___
Ur mailing list
Ur@impredicative.com
http://www.impredicative.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ur