Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-23 Thread Roger Eller
On Jan 23, 2013 12:07 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote:

 On 1/22/13 10:56 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:

 On 1/22/13 9:46 PM, Roger Eller wrote:

 I think MPEG1  2, as well as AVI.


 It can't just be MPEG1 and 2, can it?


 Never mind, I see that's exactly what you meant. MPEG 1 and 2 and AVI.

 That's pretty bad.

 --
 Jacqueline Landman Gay

I don't blame Microsoft though. These were the formats of that time. I
believe MetaCard could play them. RunRev has dropped the ball with desktop
parity long ago. Of course Linux has fallen farthest behind, requiring
Xanim to play the old formats.

~Roger
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-23 Thread Robert Sneidar
I think poor Jacque is in one of those situations where the requirements for 
her project are self contradictory. An extreme example might be if someone 
wanted me to write a game that was completely portable, and required advanced 
3D graphics capabilities, but had to work without requiring the use of a 3D 
graphics card. I would have to find a polite way to say, You people are out of 
your minds. 

To say it needs to be portable, play audio and video, and you cannot require 
the installation of any software is perhaps a bridge to far. Does any other 
development environment have the capability to natively embed audio and video 
codecs in a portable app and use them even if they are not installed in a 
system? I think this is a limitation of making something portable, and not a 
deficiency of LC proper. my 2 ¢. 

Bob



On Jan 23, 2013, at 4:37 AM, Roger Eller wrote:

 On Jan 23, 2013 12:07 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
 
 On 1/22/13 10:56 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
 
 On 1/22/13 9:46 PM, Roger Eller wrote:
 
 I think MPEG1  2, as well as AVI.
 
 
 It can't just be MPEG1 and 2, can it?
 
 
 Never mind, I see that's exactly what you meant. MPEG 1 and 2 and AVI.
 
 That's pretty bad.
 
 --
 Jacqueline Landman Gay
 
 I don't blame Microsoft though. These were the formats of that time. I
 believe MetaCard could play them. RunRev has dropped the ball with desktop
 parity long ago. Of course Linux has fallen farthest behind, requiring
 Xanim to play the old formats.
 
 ~Roger


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-23 Thread J. Landman Gay

On 1/23/13 3:31 PM, Robert Sneidar wrote:


To say it needs to be portable, play audio and video, and you cannot
require the installation of any software is perhaps a bridge to far.


Given the nature of the software though, the requirement is legitimate.


Does any other development environment have the capability to
natively embed audio and video codecs in a portable app and use them
even if they are not installed in a system?


Actually, Alejandro suggested a clever app that can embed QT (or other 
things) into your software, but I'm hesitant to use a solution that I 
have no control over.


Since the client will be creating the video, my current thinking is to 
create two versions, one in WMP native format and another in QT format. 
The software will download the right one according to platform. That 
seems the simplest way. The player object works on Windows with movies 
in WMP format, though there are some bugs that need to be fixed 
regarding scripted playback.


I got excited yesterday when I found that my Mac could also play WMP 
movies, until I remembered I had Flip4Mac installed. It was a 
short-lived high.


--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-23 Thread As_Simon
J. Landman Gay wrote
 Since the client will be creating the video, my current thinking is to 
 create two versions, one in WMP native format and another in QT format. 
 The software will download the right one according to platform. That 
 seems the simplest way. The player object works on Windows with movies 
 in WMP format, though there are some bugs that need to be fixed 
 regarding scripted playback.

This is the conclusion I came to for my flash drive stored apps.  MPEG2 was
the most modern cross platform CODEC. Which you still might consider if it's
for your flash drive project as people tend to walk around with the drive
and just plug it in anywhere.  Yes, I know the quality is not that great
compared to modern CODECs, but it's a balance with portability.

Our high end luxury goods clients decided to force download of both WMP and
QT in the end.

Simon




--
View this message in context: 
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/More-about-audio-video-tp4659056p4659424.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-23 Thread Robert Sneidar
That might be an option. Tell them, I can do this, but if you want the best 
quality, then I need to ensure that certain codecs are installed.

Bob Sneidar
IT Manager
Calvary Chapel CM
Sent from iPhone

On Jan 23, 2013, at 14:44, As_Simon si...@asato-media.com wrote:

 J. Landman Gay wrote
 Since the client will be creating the video, my current thinking is to 
 create two versions, one in WMP native format and another in QT format. 
 The software will download the right one according to platform. That 
 seems the simplest way. The player object works on Windows with movies 
 in WMP format, though there are some bugs that need to be fixed 
 regarding scripted playback.
 
 This is the conclusion I came to for my flash drive stored apps.  MPEG2 was
 the most modern cross platform CODEC. Which you still might consider if it's
 for your flash drive project as people tend to walk around with the drive
 and just plug it in anywhere.  Yes, I know the quality is not that great
 compared to modern CODECs, but it's a balance with portability.
 
 Our high end luxury goods clients decided to force download of both WMP and
 QT in the end.
 
 Simon
 
 
 
 
 --
 View this message in context: 
 http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/More-about-audio-video-tp4659056p4659424.html
 Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 
 ___
 use-livecode mailing list
 use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-23 Thread J. Landman Gay

On 1/23/13 4:44 PM, As_Simon wrote:

J. Landman Gay wrote

Since the client will be creating the video, my current thinking is to
create two versions, one in WMP native format and another in QT format.
The software will download the right one according to platform. That
seems the simplest way. The player object works on Windows with movies
in WMP format, though there are some bugs that need to be fixed
regarding scripted playback.


This is the conclusion I came to for my flash drive stored apps.  MPEG2 was
the most modern cross platform CODEC. Which you still might consider if it's
for your flash drive project as people tend to walk around with the drive
and just plug it in anywhere.


Yup, flash drive, and that's exactly what will happen. Who knows what 
computer they'll be on. I'll ask about MPEG2 though in case the client 
is willing to compromise a little.


--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-22 Thread J. Landman Gay
I'm still not sure which video formats are supported in LiveCode on 
Windows machines that don't have QuickTime. Does anyone have a list?


--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-22 Thread Roger Eller
I think MPEG1  2, as well as AVI.

If playing externally, Microsoft has a list. I would hope that most people
have moved past Win95 to Win2k. Assuming a minimum of XP, here's what
should work without installing additional software:

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/899113

If you install VLC, you can play anything.

~Roger

Sent from my Pipo M2
On Jan 22, 2013 10:22 PM, J. Landman Gay jac...@hyperactivesw.com wrote:

 I'm still not sure which video formats are supported in LiveCode on
 Windows machines that don't have QuickTime. Does anyone have a list?

 --
 Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
 HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com

 __**_
 use-livecode mailing list
 use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
 subscription preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/**mailman/listinfo/use-livecodehttp://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-22 Thread J. Landman Gay

On 1/22/13 9:46 PM, Roger Eller wrote:

I think MPEG1  2, as well as AVI.

If playing externally, Microsoft has a list. I would hope that most people
have moved past Win95 to Win2k. Assuming a minimum of XP, here's what
should work without installing additional software:

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/899113


Thanks. That lists a bunch of MPEG 4 codecs, but mp4 won't play in a 
player object in LiveCode. Does anyone know which ones will? It can't 
just be MPEG1 and 2, can it?


--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-22 Thread J. Landman Gay

On 1/22/13 10:56 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:

On 1/22/13 9:46 PM, Roger Eller wrote:

I think MPEG1  2, as well as AVI.

If playing externally, Microsoft has a list. I would hope that most
people
have moved past Win95 to Win2k. Assuming a minimum of XP, here's what
should work without installing additional software:

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/899113


Thanks. That lists a bunch of MPEG 4 codecs, but mp4 won't play in a
player object in LiveCode. Does anyone know which ones will? It can't
just be MPEG1 and 2, can it?



Never mind, I see that's exactly what you meant. MPEG 1 and 2 and AVI.

That's pretty bad.

--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-22 Thread Colin Holgate
That list continues to support what I've argued, in that they don't list MPEG-2 
as a built in codec.

For what it's worth, WMV 9 is a decent codec.


On Jan 22, 2013, at 10:46 PM, Roger Eller roger.e.el...@sealedair.com wrote:

 I think MPEG1  2, as well as AVI.
 
 If playing externally, Microsoft has a list. I would hope that most people
 have moved past Win95 to Win2k. Assuming a minimum of XP, here's what
 should work without installing additional software:
 
 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/899113

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-19 Thread Klaus on-rev
Hi friends,

Am 18.01.2013 um 21:51 schrieb Alejandro Tejada capellan2...@gmail.com:

 Hi Stephen,
 
 Stephen Barncard-4 wrote
 VLC is also apple-scriptable.
 Some months ago, Klaus Major posted 
 a message asking for developers interested
 in a VLC dll for LiveCode.
 What happened with this DLL? Klaus?

sorry, no news so far...

 ...
 Al

Best

Klaus

--
Klaus Major
http://www.major-k.de
kl...@major.on-rev.com


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-19 Thread Alejandro Tejada
Hi Klaus,


Klaus on-rev wrote
 Hi friends,
 What happened with this VLC DLL? Klaus?
 sorry, no news so far...
 Best, Klaus

Well... VLC changed it's licensing
to make possible that commercial
applications, like LiveCode, contribute
to the project...

This change was motivated to match the evolution of 
the video industry and to spread the VLC engine as a 
multi-platform open-source multimedia engine and library. 

But there is a more important concern...
Was this matter with Tuviah Snyder solved in the correct way?
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/My-poll-for-externals-the-quot-punchline-quot-td4656532.html

Have a nice weekend!

Al



--
View this message in context: 
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/More-about-audio-video-tp4659056p4659181.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-18 Thread Robert Sneidar
Really? My mistake then I as under the impression that this was included in all 
operating systems because they will need to play DVD ROM's. 

Bob


On Jan 17, 2013, at 7:53 PM, Colin Holgate wrote:

 MPEG-2 isn't really an option. Only systems that have DVD-ROMs, and DVD-Video 
 playing software, would be able to play MPEG-2. In the Windows world it's not 
 unusual for people to find illegal ways around that, and on Mac you have the 
 option of buying the $20 MPEG-2 playback component, but overall I don't think 
 you can assume that MPEG-2 will be available.
 
 
 On Jan 17, 2013, at 10:36 PM, Pierre Sahores s...@sahores-conseil.com wrote:
 
 I'm not so sure as Bob is about mp2 indeed : lowest compression than mp4 and 
 its useful H264 declinaison.
 
 ___
 use-livecode mailing list
 use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-18 Thread Peter Haworth
Hi Phil,
I use ffmpeg too and I found a GUI interface to it - ffmpegx, available at
http://www.ffmpegx.com/

Pete
lcSQL Software http://www.lcsql.com


On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Phil Davis rev...@pdslabs.net wrote:

 One tool l I have found to be almost magical in its media conversion
 capabilities is ffmpeg. It's open source, cross-platform, command-line
 only, but is used as the engine in a number of commercial apps.

 Also, it has a serious learning curve.

 But a good tool if it's what you need. We use it in my client's system to
 convert Mac videos (.mov) to .wmv and also to web-friendly formats.

 Phil Davis



 On 1/17/13 8:05 PM, Pierre Sahores wrote:

 Good to know too. Thanks !

 Le 18 janv. 2013 à 04:53, stephen barncard a écrit :

  Vimeo, than to depend on
 one's own servers. $60/year buys up to 5 gigs of video a month.

 --
 Pierre Sahores
 mobile : 06 03 95 77 70
 www.sahores-conseil.com


 __**_
 use-livecode mailing list
 use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
 subscription preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/**mailman/listinfo/use-livecodehttp://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


 --
 Phil Davis


 __**_
 use-livecode mailing list
 use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
 subscription preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/**mailman/listinfo/use-livecodehttp://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-18 Thread Phil Davis

Righto. That's one of the commercial apps that uses it.
p

On 1/18/13 11:05 AM, Peter Haworth wrote:

Hi Phil,
I use ffmpeg too and I found a GUI interface to it - ffmpegx, available at
http://www.ffmpegx.com/

Pete
lcSQL Software http://www.lcsql.com


On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Phil Davis rev...@pdslabs.net wrote:


One tool l I have found to be almost magical in its media conversion
capabilities is ffmpeg. It's open source, cross-platform, command-line
only, but is used as the engine in a number of commercial apps.

Also, it has a serious learning curve.

But a good tool if it's what you need. We use it in my client's system to
convert Mac videos (.mov) to .wmv and also to web-friendly formats.

Phil Davis



On 1/17/13 8:05 PM, Pierre Sahores wrote:


Good to know too. Thanks !

Le 18 janv. 2013 à 04:53, stephen barncard a écrit :

  Vimeo, than to depend on

one's own servers. $60/year buys up to 5 gigs of video a month.


--
Pierre Sahores
mobile : 06 03 95 77 70
www.sahores-conseil.com


__**_
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/**mailman/listinfo/use-livecodehttp://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode



--
Phil Davis


__**_
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/**mailman/listinfo/use-livecodehttp://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode



--
Phil Davis


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-18 Thread Colin Holgate
MPEG-2 isn't needed to use DVD-ROMs. It is needed to play DVD-Video. The 
license for MPEG-2 is covered in the cost of the software that you buy for 
playing DVDs. You may well get bundled software, and so the cost is hidden from 
you. I think that each way of playing back DVD-Video will have its own license 
fee, so even though you paid for MPEG-2 to use DVD Player on a Mac, you still 
have to pay the $20 to be able to play MPEG-2 in other applications.

If you look at MPEG Streamclip as an example application for processing MPEG-2, 
it just will not work unless you have bought the MPEG-2 Playback Component, 
because they have complied with the license rules.


On Jan 18, 2013, at 1:28 PM, Robert Sneidar slylab...@me.com wrote:

 Really? My mistake then I as under the impression that this was included in 
 all operating systems because they will need to play DVD ROM's. 

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-18 Thread Alejandro Tejada
Hi Stephen,


Stephen Barncard-4 wrote
 VLC is also apple-scriptable.

Some months ago, Klaus Major posted 
a message asking for developers interested
in a VLC dll for LiveCode.

What happened with this DLL? Klaus?

I have used VLC from the command line from LiveCode,
showing a borderless video window floating above
a fullscreen stack. 

It looks... different, but that was the way in which
video was played in many old multimedia apps.

Al







--
View this message in context: 
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/More-about-audio-video-tp4659056p4659139.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-18 Thread Alejandro Tejada
Hi Jacque,


J. Landman Gay wrote
 I've been testing in Windows 7 without QuickTime installed to see how 
 video and audio files work in a player object. 
 [snip]
 I need a video format that will play in Windows without QT. Which of the 
 many others should I look at?

Could you try virtualizing your application with Quicktime embedded?

Check this thread:
Running LiveCode and Quicktime as virtual applications
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!msg/runrev/3LASEKJdhMQ/jt1OABZmwnMJ

I am not sure if virtualized applications could run in every
operating system, or if you need to create a different one
for Windows XP, Vista, 7 and Aero...

Al



--
View this message in context: 
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/More-about-audio-video-tp4659056p4659141.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-18 Thread J. Landman Gay

On 1/18/13 2:57 PM, Alejandro Tejada wrote:

Hi Jacque,


J. Landman Gay wrote

I've been testing in Windows 7 without QuickTime installed to see how
video and audio files work in a player object.
[snip]
I need a video format that will play in Windows without QT. Which of the
many others should I look at?


Could you try virtualizing your application with Quicktime embedded?

Check this thread:
Running LiveCode and Quicktime as virtual applications
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!msg/runrev/3LASEKJdhMQ/jt1OABZmwnMJ


Thanks, I'll ask my client about it. Right now I'm collecting all the 
responses here so I can talk to them.


--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-18 Thread Robert Sneidar
Right. But wasn't the question about being able to play audio and video cross 
platform without having to make the user install anything? Also, I have played 
ripped DVD content off my hard drive, and the format of the ripped video is 
MPEG2, so strictly speaking, you don't *have* to play MPEG2 off a DVD. That 
just happens to be the format DVD's use. Some older cameras record in MPEG2 
format. I was able to play these in Quicktime, which was bundled with OS X, and 
I think some kind of video player must be bundled with PC's, although I have in 
the past gotten a DVD Player app that came with the PC that I had to install in 
order to play DVD's. 

Bob


On Jan 18, 2013, at 11:34 AM, Colin Holgate wrote:

 MPEG-2 isn't needed to use DVD-ROMs. It is needed to play DVD-Video. The 
 license for MPEG-2 is covered in the cost of the software that you buy for 
 playing DVDs. You may well get bundled software, and so the cost is hidden 
 from you. I think that each way of playing back DVD-Video will have its own 
 license fee, so even though you paid for MPEG-2 to use DVD Player on a Mac, 
 you still have to pay the $20 to be able to play MPEG-2 in other applications.
 
 If you look at MPEG Streamclip as an example application for processing 
 MPEG-2, it just will not work unless you have bought the MPEG-2 Playback 
 Component, because they have complied with the license rules.
 
 
 On Jan 18, 2013, at 1:28 PM, Robert Sneidar slylab...@me.com wrote:
 
 Really? My mistake then I as under the impression that this was included in 
 all operating systems because they will need to play DVD ROM's. 
 
 ___
 use-livecode mailing list
 use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-18 Thread Colin Holgate
Yes, exactly. Anyone who doesn't have a DVD-ROM drive and bundled DVD-Video 
software, or gone to the trouble of installing MPEG-2 playback by some other 
means, would end up having to install something. QuickTime is probably the 
easiest thing to require, because of the millions of users who have iTunes 
installed, all of them have QuickTime already.

Other tools are able to play video files without an extra install, Director and 
Flash for example can both natively play H.264, without requiring QuickTime or 
any other system software to be installed. Maybe LiveCode will one day too. For 
now, as I mentioned, you can play a Flash swf in a revBrowser, and that can 
play HD H.264 files for you. But I suspect that doing random access of the 
video won't be as easy as it is in Director or Flash.


On Jan 18, 2013, at 4:44 PM, Robert Sneidar slylab...@me.com wrote:

 Right. But wasn't the question about being able to play audio and video 
 cross platform without having to make the user install anything?

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-18 Thread Alejandro Tejada
J. Landman Gay wrote
 Thanks, I'll ask my client about it. Right now I'm collecting all the 
 responses here so I can talk to them.

In this website, you could find Cameyo, a free app for
virtualising applications: http://www.cameyo.com/

The virtual app that I build, using StackRunner and
Quicktime Lite worked really well in every machine of
the Computer Lab where I tested them.

Just notice that these were relatively new computers
with an updated and really clean Windows OS (They used a software
that restores the system to original condition after every reboot).

Al



--
View this message in context: 
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/More-about-audio-video-tp4659056p4659157.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread Alex Shaw

Hi Jacqueline

If you don't need streaming you could try MPEG-1 video files.

When compressed properly they are relatively good quality, just a bit 
bigger filesize-wise compared to MPEG-4.


regards
alex

On 18/01/13 8:58 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote:

I've been testing in Windows 7 without QuickTime installed to see how
video and audio files work in a player object. Some formats that work
fine in WMP will not work in LiveCode. The same files that fail in
LiveCode also fail in the preview panel in Explorer. But they do work in
WMP itself.

I didn't test all types, just what I had on my drive. These work fine in
LiveCode:

.wmp
.mp3
.avi -- doesn't really work; audio only, very poor quality

These do not work at all in a player (or in the preview panel in
Explorer.) They simply do not load:

.mp4
.mov

In the Media Player app itself, all the above formats play perfectly. I
did not need to download any extra codecs, not even for .mov files.

For the two that work in LiveCode, all player-related functions seemed
to be okay. I could start, stop, get the duration, get/set the
currentTime, etc. I didn't test any messaging, like callbacks.

I need a video format that will play in Windows without QT. Which of the
many others should I look at?



___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread Mark Wieder
J. Landman Gay jacque@... writes:

 In the Media Player app itself, all the above formats play perfectly. I 
 did not need to download any extra codecs, not even for .mov files.

It gets worse. You can't rely on just the file extension.

The other day I pulled down a GoToMeeting archive as a .wmv file and VLC, my
go-to media player, wouldn't play it. Launched it in the Dreaded Windows Media
Player and it played just fine. The .wmv file was encoded in a format I've never
heard of before (Gsomething24, if I remember correctly), and it seems that only
the DWMP has the decoder built in.

-- 
 Mark Wieder
 mwie...@ahsoftware.net


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread J. Landman Gay

On 1/17/13 5:34 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:

J. Landman Gay jacque@... writes:


In the Media Player app itself, all the above formats play perfectly. I
did not need to download any extra codecs, not even for .mov files.


It gets worse. You can't rely on just the file extension.

The other day I pulled down a GoToMeeting archive as a .wmv file and VLC, my
go-to media player, wouldn't play it. Launched it in the Dreaded Windows Media
Player and it played just fine. The .wmv file was encoded in a format I've never
heard of before (Gsomething24, if I remember correctly), and it seems that only
the DWMP has the decoder built in.



Decoders are part of apps and not the OS?

At least in my case, the videos will be known in advance and have the 
right extensions. I guess that doesn't mean today's test videos did though.


--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread J. Landman Gay

On 1/17/13 5:08 PM, Alex Shaw wrote:

Hi Jacqueline

If you don't need streaming you could try MPEG-1 video files.


I don't know if we'll need streaming yet, so I'll keep this in mind. I 
didn't test MPEG-1 files yet, so we'll see. Maybe it's moot.


--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread Robert Sneidar
Hush! You are not implying Microsoft would develop a proprietary codec that 
only their player could use?? What self respecting corporation would even think 
of such a thing???

Bob


On Jan 17, 2013, at 3:34 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:

 J. Landman Gay jacque@... writes:
 
 In the Media Player app itself, all the above formats play perfectly. I 
 did not need to download any extra codecs, not even for .mov files.
 
 It gets worse. You can't rely on just the file extension.
 
 The other day I pulled down a GoToMeeting archive as a .wmv file and VLC, my
 go-to media player, wouldn't play it. Launched it in the Dreaded Windows Media
 Player and it played just fine. The .wmv file was encoded in a format I've 
 never
 heard of before (Gsomething24, if I remember correctly), and it seems that 
 only
 the DWMP has the decoder built in.
 
 -- 
 Mark Wieder
 mwie...@ahsoftware.net
 
 
 ___
 use-livecode mailing list
 use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread Robert Sneidar
Do you mean Codecs? To answer your question, yes and no. If you never use WMP, 
you will probably not have a lot of codecs it supports. Even if you do, you may 
not have all of them. While the audio codec would probably be installed as a 
dll in Windows somewhere, and so be an OS function, some app probably put it 
there. Try playing a wmv file on OS X. You will need Flip4Mac. Once you install 
it, anything needing to play WMV files will have access to the codec. So the 
correct answer I suppose is, yes, no. 

Bob


On Jan 17, 2013, at 3:53 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:

 Decoders are part of apps and not the OS?
 
 At least in my case, the videos will be known in advance and have the right 
 extensions. I guess that doesn't mean today's test videos did though.
 
 -- 
 Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
 HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread Scott Rossi
It's been a long time since I dealt with this, but last I checked, MPEG1
and maybe MPEG2 worked cross platform.

As Mark said, file extension doesn't always correspond with the encoding
of a video file. If you have control over the format of the videos to
played, then you should have no trouble.  But if you have to be able to
playback media any from any source, you may need a more robust solution
than what LiveCode offers.

Regards,

Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, UX Design




On 1/17/13 2:58 PM, J. Landman Gay jac...@hyperactivesw.com wrote:

I've been testing in Windows 7 without QuickTime installed to see how
video and audio files work in a player object. Some formats that work
fine in WMP will not work in LiveCode. The same files that fail in
LiveCode also fail in the preview panel in Explorer. But they do work in
WMP itself.

I didn't test all types, just what I had on my drive. These work fine in
LiveCode:

.wmp
.mp3
.avi -- doesn't really work; audio only, very poor quality

These do not work at all in a player (or in the preview panel in
Explorer.) They simply do not load:

.mp4
.mov

In the Media Player app itself, all the above formats play perfectly. I
did not need to download any extra codecs, not even for .mov files.

For the two that work in LiveCode, all player-related functions seemed
to be okay. I could start, stop, get the duration, get/set the
currentTime, etc. I didn't test any messaging, like callbacks.

I need a video format that will play in Windows without QT. Which of the
many others should I look at?

-- 
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode



___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread Pierre Sahores
Jacque,

The best is always to test different outputs formats in using MPEGStreamclip 
(- Windows formats), Handbrake (MacOS X / Linux formats), QT7 Pro (see export 
features) and QT 10 (m4v outputs). MPEG1 and MPEG2 are mainly reserved to TV 
broadband outputs, not featured as web dedicated. Sure you will find your way 
;-)

Best,

Pierre

Le 18 janv. 2013 à 00:08, Alex Shaw a écrit :

 Hi Jacqueline
 
 If you don't need streaming you could try MPEG-1 video files.
 
 When compressed properly they are relatively good quality, just a bit bigger 
 filesize-wise compared to MPEG-4.
 
 regards
 alex
 
 On 18/01/13 8:58 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
 I've been testing in Windows 7 without QuickTime installed to see how
 video and audio files work in a player object. Some formats that work
 fine in WMP will not work in LiveCode. The same files that fail in
 LiveCode also fail in the preview panel in Explorer. But they do work in
 WMP itself.
 
 I didn't test all types, just what I had on my drive. These work fine in
 LiveCode:
 
 .wmp
 .mp3
 .avi -- doesn't really work; audio only, very poor quality
 
 These do not work at all in a player (or in the preview panel in
 Explorer.) They simply do not load:
 
 .mp4
 .mov
 
 In the Media Player app itself, all the above formats play perfectly. I
 did not need to download any extra codecs, not even for .mov files.
 
 For the two that work in LiveCode, all player-related functions seemed
 to be okay. I could start, stop, get the duration, get/set the
 currentTime, etc. I didn't test any messaging, like callbacks.
 
 I need a video format that will play in Windows without QT. Which of the
 many others should I look at?
 
 
 ___
 use-livecode mailing list
 use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

--
Pierre Sahores
mobile : 06 03 95 77 70
www.sahores-conseil.com


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread J. Landman Gay
Thanks for all the responses. The audio/video files will be prepared by 
my client and served over the internet to customers. We have control 
over the format, the names, whatever is needed.


The catch is that the people who will be viewing the media can be on any 
computer, often one they don't own (i.e., student labs, coffeeshops, 
their neighbors, etc.) and we can't require any software installation. 
The app itself will almost always be on a thumb drive.


No software installs means the media can't require QT, any special 
codecs, etc. Whatever is the lowest common denominator is what we have 
to use. For Macs I can depend on QT but for Windows users I can't.


If the decompressor or codec can be shipped with the app then that may 
be something we could do. But I always thought codecs were installed 
into the OS, and we can't do that.


I'm pretty sure my client, who is an audiophile, wouldn't be happy with 
MPEG-1. So I'm open to suggestions.


--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread Colin Holgate
If need be, can you use something other than LiveCode to solve the problem? A 
Flash projector ought to be able to work, and doesn't rely on any system 
software to be able to play H.264 video, along with high quality AAC audio.

Or, if you can require that the system has Flash Player (which most systems do) 
you could use a rev browser to play a swf in LiveCode.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread Robert Sneidar
Lowest common denominator then. For audio, use mp3. For video, mpeg2. Just 
about every modern os supports those 2 out of the box. 

Bob Sneidar
IT Manager
Calvary Chapel CM
Sent from iPhone

On Jan 17, 2013, at 18:38, J. Landman Gay jac...@hyperactivesw.com wrote:

 Thanks for all the responses. The audio/video files will be prepared by my 
 client and served over the internet to customers. We have control over the 
 format, the names, whatever is needed.
 
 The catch is that the people who will be viewing the media can be on any 
 computer, often one they don't own (i.e., student labs, coffeeshops, their 
 neighbors, etc.) and we can't require any software installation. The app 
 itself will almost always be on a thumb drive.
 
 No software installs means the media can't require QT, any special codecs, 
 etc. Whatever is the lowest common denominator is what we have to use. For 
 Macs I can depend on QT but for Windows users I can't.
 
 If the decompressor or codec can be shipped with the app then that may be 
 something we could do. But I always thought codecs were installed into the 
 OS, and we can't do that.
 
 I'm pretty sure my client, who is an audiophile, wouldn't be happy with 
 MPEG-1. So I'm open to suggestions.
 
 -- 
 Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
 HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
 
 ___
 use-livecode mailing list
 use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread stephen barncard
J.

There's one open source app that might be ripe for imbedding:

VLC

http://www.videolan.org/vlc/index.html

cross-platform, the source is available, and if one can open a window from
the command line

This idea was inspired a little mac app called NICECAST.  A beautiful mac
front end with an ICECAST server inside. I checked out the app bundle, and
sure enough, there was a folder with the ICECAST code in there.

If it has the right hooks, VLC could be the basis for a library.

If this has been tried before, I apologize.

sqb

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 6:38 PM, J. Landman Gay jac...@hyperactivesw.comwrote:

 Thanks for all the responses. The audio/video files will be prepared by my
 client and served over the internet to customers. We have control over the
 format, the names, whatever is needed.

 The catch is that the people who will be viewing the media can be on any
 computer, often one they don't own (i.e., student labs, coffeeshops, their
 neighbors, etc.) and we can't require any software installation. The app
 itself will almost always be on a thumb drive.

 No software installs means the media can't require QT, any special codecs,
 etc. Whatever is the lowest common denominator is what we have to use. For
 Macs I can depend on QT but for Windows users I can't.

 If the decompressor or codec can be shipped with the app then that may be
 something we could do. But I always thought codecs were installed into the
 OS, and we can't do that.

 I'm pretty sure my client, who is an audiophile, wouldn't be happy with
 MPEG-1. So I'm open to suggestions.


 --
 Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
 HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com

 __**_
 use-livecode mailing list
 use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
 subscription preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/**mailman/listinfo/use-livecodehttp://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode




-- 



Stephen Barncard
San Francisco Ca. USA

more about sqb  http://www.google.com/profiles/sbarncar
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread Pierre Sahores
As an example, avi encodes mp4. Just to point out that codecs and the ways 
video contents are encoded are always two distinct things.

If you can use a javascript to test the end user installed OS, you will get way 
to serve the adapted video format for each different target. Not a painless 
configuration to set up but it will work as expected against any client-side 
config.

If the medias have mainly to be online streamed, Darwin Streaming Server (free 
version of Quicktime Streaming Server) will always provide best results, 
fluidity and multi-platform availability (RTSP)  than Apache (HTTP). I used it 
to serve live conferences and VOD contents for the Sorbonne University 
(2005/2008) via the Renater 3 french universities network with 100% of 
reachability on Mac and Windows clients (both web pages and Rev standalones 
clients). The Darwin Streaming Server runs as well under MacOS X than under 
Linux. Lots easiest to configure than Red5 Media Server witch can, for its own, 
embed the same codecs as DSS with the ability to serves them as flash contents.

We always need to get in mind that video streaming is a very big bandwidth 
consumer + lots of RAM + fast hard drives needed on the server side. In some 
cases, YouTube hosting can really become the best maxi-min way to go.

Le 18 janv. 2013 à 03:38, J. Landman Gay a écrit :

 Thanks for all the responses. The audio/video files will be prepared by my 
 client and served over the internet to customers. We have control over the 
 format, the names, whatever is needed.
 
 The catch is that the people who will be viewing the media can be on any 
 computer, often one they don't own (i.e., student labs, coffeeshops, their 
 neighbors, etc.) and we can't require any software installation. The app 
 itself will almost always be on a thumb drive.
 
 No software installs means the media can't require QT, any special codecs, 
 etc. Whatever is the lowest common denominator is what we have to use. For 
 Macs I can depend on QT but for Windows users I can't.
 
 If the decompressor or codec can be shipped with the app then that may be 
 something we could do. But I always thought codecs were installed into the 
 OS, and we can't do that.
 
 I'm pretty sure my client, who is an audiophile, wouldn't be happy with 
 MPEG-1. So I'm open to suggestions.
 
 -- 
 Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
 HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
 
 ___
 use-livecode mailing list
 use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

--
Pierre Sahores
mobile : 06 03 95 77 70
www.sahores-conseil.com


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread Pierre Sahores
Just follow Bob on this : about audio, don't search any best way than mp3. Will 
works as expected against any end-user target. I'm not so sure as Bob is about 
mp2 indeed : lowest compression than mp4 and its useful H264 declinaison.

Le 18 janv. 2013 à 03:52, Robert Sneidar a écrit :

 Lowest common denominator then. For audio, use mp3. For video, mpeg2. Just 
 about every modern os supports those 2 out of the box. 
 
 Bob Sneidar
 IT Manager
 Calvary Chapel CM
 Sent from iPhone
 
 On Jan 17, 2013, at 18:38, J. Landman Gay jac...@hyperactivesw.com wrote:
 
 Thanks for all the responses. The audio/video files will be prepared by my 
 client and served over the internet to customers. We have control over the 
 format, the names, whatever is needed.
 
 The catch is that the people who will be viewing the media can be on any 
 computer, often one they don't own (i.e., student labs, coffeeshops, their 
 neighbors, etc.) and we can't require any software installation. The app 
 itself will almost always be on a thumb drive.
 
 No software installs means the media can't require QT, any special codecs, 
 etc. Whatever is the lowest common denominator is what we have to use. For 
 Macs I can depend on QT but for Windows users I can't.
 
 If the decompressor or codec can be shipped with the app then that may be 
 something we could do. But I always thought codecs were installed into the 
 OS, and we can't do that.
 
 I'm pretty sure my client, who is an audiophile, wouldn't be happy with 
 MPEG-1. So I'm open to suggestions.
 
 -- 
 Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
 HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
 
 ___
 use-livecode mailing list
 use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
 
 ___
 use-livecode mailing list
 use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

--
Pierre Sahores
mobile : 06 03 95 77 70
www.sahores-conseil.com


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread stephen barncard
As far as serving video, my experiments have shown that it is often better
to use a service that does it for a living, like Vimeo, than to depend on
one's own servers. $60/year buys up to 5 gigs of video a month. Far better
than youtoob.

And if one ends up using a browser for displaying video content, then I've
found the JW Player at Longtail to be the the best imbedded player
available today.

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Pierre Sahores s...@sahores-conseil.comwrote:

 Just follow Bob on this : about audio, don't search any best way than mp3.
 Will works as expected against any end-user target. I'm not so sure as Bob
 is about mp2 indeed : lowest compression than mp4 and its useful H264
 declinaison.

 Le 18 janv. 2013 à 03:52, Robert Sneidar a écrit :

  Lowest common denominator then. For audio, use mp3. For video, mpeg2.
 Just about every modern os supports those 2 out of the box.
 
  Bob Sneidar
  IT Manager
  Calvary Chapel CM
  Sent from iPhone
 
  On Jan 17, 2013, at 18:38, J. Landman Gay jac...@hyperactivesw.com
 wrote:
 
  Thanks for all the responses. The audio/video files will be prepared by
 my client and served over the internet to customers. We have control over
 the format, the names, whatever is needed.
 
  The catch is that the people who will be viewing the media can be on
 any computer, often one they don't own (i.e., student labs, coffeeshops,
 their neighbors, etc.) and we can't require any software installation. The
 app itself will almost always be on a thumb drive.
 
  No software installs means the media can't require QT, any special
 codecs, etc. Whatever is the lowest common denominator is what we have to
 use. For Macs I can depend on QT but for Windows users I can't.
 
  If the decompressor or codec can be shipped with the app then that may
 be something we could do. But I always thought codecs were installed into
 the OS, and we can't do that.
 
  I'm pretty sure my client, who is an audiophile, wouldn't be happy with
 MPEG-1. So I'm open to suggestions.
 
  --
  Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
  HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
 
  ___
  use-livecode mailing list
  use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
  Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
 subscription preferences:
  http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
 
  ___
  use-livecode mailing list
  use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
  Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
 subscription preferences:
  http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

 --
 Pierre Sahores
 mobile : 06 03 95 77 70
 www.sahores-conseil.com


 ___
 use-livecode mailing list
 use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
 subscription preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode




-- 



Stephen Barncard
San Francisco Ca. USA

more about sqb  http://www.google.com/profiles/sbarncar
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread Colin Holgate
MPEG-2 isn't really an option. Only systems that have DVD-ROMs, and DVD-Video 
playing software, would be able to play MPEG-2. In the Windows world it's not 
unusual for people to find illegal ways around that, and on Mac you have the 
option of buying the $20 MPEG-2 playback component, but overall I don't think 
you can assume that MPEG-2 will be available.


On Jan 17, 2013, at 10:36 PM, Pierre Sahores s...@sahores-conseil.com wrote:

 I'm not so sure as Bob is about mp2 indeed : lowest compression than mp4 and 
 its useful H264 declinaison.

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread stephen barncard
VLC is also apple-scriptable.




Stephen Barncard
San Francisco Ca. USA

more about sqb  http://www.google.com/profiles/sbarncar
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread Pierre Sahores
Good to know too. Thanks !

Le 18 janv. 2013 à 04:53, stephen barncard a écrit :

 Vimeo, than to depend on
 one's own servers. $60/year buys up to 5 gigs of video a month.

--
Pierre Sahores
mobile : 06 03 95 77 70
www.sahores-conseil.com


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread Phil Davis
One tool l I have found to be almost magical in its media conversion 
capabilities is ffmpeg. It's open source, cross-platform, command-line 
only, but is used as the engine in a number of commercial apps.


Also, it has a serious learning curve.

But a good tool if it's what you need. We use it in my client's system 
to convert Mac videos (.mov) to .wmv and also to web-friendly formats.


Phil Davis



On 1/17/13 8:05 PM, Pierre Sahores wrote:

Good to know too. Thanks !

Le 18 janv. 2013 à 04:53, stephen barncard a écrit :


Vimeo, than to depend on
one's own servers. $60/year buys up to 5 gigs of video a month.

--
Pierre Sahores
mobile : 06 03 95 77 70
www.sahores-conseil.com


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode



--
Phil Davis


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode