Re: Syntax anomaly

2014-11-24 Thread Bob Sneidar
In the first example click is being used as a noun as in “it took 5 clicks to 
get to where I wanted to go.”

But I think it matters not. Livecode script is “english like” (for those using 
English) not the english language itself. And English is filled with so many 
anomalies, you might say that Livecode is very “English Like” after all!

Bob S


On Nov 21, 2014, at 16:17 , Ethan Lish 
ethanl...@gmail.commailto:ethanl...@gmail.com wrote:

On browserClick is an example a the compound keyword with the controller 
browser and the action Click aggregated into a message




On closeCard is an example of the same but reversing the order of the first 
example

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Syntax anomaly

2014-11-21 Thread Ethan Lish
All


Recently I was reviewing the message syntax with a colleague. We encountered a 
anomaly and thought it would be interesting to discuss in the forum


Message language tokens seem to follow three different formats;
Action 
ControlAction
ActionControl


Is there a reason for this inconsistency?
Is there a plan to standardize?


E

—
Ethan@Lish.net240.876.1389
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Re: Syntax anomaly

2014-11-21 Thread dunbarx
Hmmm.


Are these Ruby terms? Can you elucidate the meaning of these, as they might 
pertain to LC? Or give an example of each?


Craig Newman



-Original Message-
From: Ethan Lish ethanl...@gmail.com
To: use-livecode use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Sent: Fri, Nov 21, 2014 4:31 pm
Subject: Syntax anomaly


All


Recently I was reviewing the message syntax with a colleague. We encountered a 
anomaly and thought it would be interesting to discuss in the forum


Message language tokens seem to follow three different formats;
Action 
ControlAction
ActionControl


Is there a reason for this inconsistency?
Is there a plan to standardize?


E

—
Ethan@Lish.net240.876.1389
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

 
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Re: Syntax anomaly

2014-11-21 Thread Ethan Lish
Sure, I should have included statement examples in the original post. 




On browserClick is an example a the compound keyword with the controller 
browser and the action Click aggregated into a message 




On closeCard is an example of the same but reversing the order of the first 
example 




On touchStart is an example of just the action being used as a message








Seems to be a language oddity which reduces the intuitive nature of the 
language increasing the complexity. 




I for one would prefer a standard approach of the first example. This would 
allow a natural grouping in document like the dictionary. One could go to the 
browser section and see all messages related to the browser





E


—
Ethan@Lish.net240.876.1389

On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 4:39 PM, null dunb...@aol.com wrote:

 Hmmm.
 Are these Ruby terms? Can you elucidate the meaning of these, as they might 
 pertain to LC? Or give an example of each?
 Craig Newman
 -Original Message-
 From: Ethan Lish ethanl...@gmail.com
 To: use-livecode use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
 Sent: Fri, Nov 21, 2014 4:31 pm
 Subject: Syntax anomaly
 All
 Recently I was reviewing the message syntax with a colleague. We encountered 
 a 
 anomaly and thought it would be interesting to discuss in the forum
 Message language tokens seem to follow three different formats;
 Action 
 ControlAction
 ActionControl
 Is there a reason for this inconsistency?
 Is there a plan to standardize?
 E
 —
 Ethan@Lish.net240.876.1389
 ___
 use-livecode mailing list
 use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
  
 ___
 use-livecode mailing list
 use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Re: Syntax anomaly

2014-11-21 Thread Mark Wieder
Ethan-

Friday, November 21, 2014, 4:17:01 PM, you wrote:

 I for one would prefer a standard approach of the first example.
 This would allow a natural grouping in document like the dictionary.
 One could go to the browser section and see all messages related to
 the browser

Something like this?

on cardClose
  closeCard
end cardClose

-- 
-Mark Wieder
 ahsoftw...@gmail.com

This communication may be unlawfully collected and stored by the National 
Security Agency (NSA) in secret. The parties to this email do not 
consent to the retrieving or storing of this communication and any 
related metadata, as well as printing, copying, re-transmitting, 
disseminating, or otherwise using it. If you believe you have received 
this communication in error, please delete it immediately.


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode