Re: Upgrade to Lion - backups

2012-05-31 Thread Jeff Reynolds
bob,

alternate drive is for redundancy if a drive were ever to poop out and I keep 
one off site or in a firesafe if here as well for the theft/fire issue. 
 
I learned this thru a friend who had a very redundant backup system. only 
problem was not good about offsite and there was a fire in the office took out 
everything with fire, heat, smoke, and water damage... another friend had his 
laptop and the backup drive attached (only one) stolen from his home -- again 
SOL.

also ive had a couple of drives go by a head coming loose and that pretty much 
leaves you with nothing to recover...

main drive system is a redundant raid as well. few hundred buck investment over 
the years gives me a nice safety net and this system has spun along fine now 
for 5 years w/o any hickups due to the drives. my experience with backup 
systems has been total murphy's law.

watching a few other folks trying to recover from a data disasters has taught 
me as they all took huge number of hours (translate that to work hours lost), 
bucks in data recovery efforts, and im sure a few weeks of their life 
expectancy...

over the years ive dealt with most kinds of tape and cartridge backup systems 
as well with clients and companies ive worked with and most have worked but 
talk about a pain to reconstruct, was rarely easy or fast, hence when drives 
got cheap enough i moved fast!

cheers

jeff

On May 31, 2012, at 3:33 PM, use-livecode-requ...@lists.runrev.com wrote:

 Should not need to alternate drives with Time Machine. 
 
 Bob

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Upgrade to Lion - backups

2012-05-31 Thread Tim Jones
And ... what do you do if part of your failure instance includes a lack of 
network connectivity?  No way back from that one.  Just saying...

Tim

On May 31, 2012, at 1:52 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:

 OIC that makes sense then. I priced out some of these online backup systems 
 like Carbonite, and by the time you pay as much as a 2 tb drive with 
 enclosure would cost, you could have paid for a 5 year subscription to 
 Carbonite. 5 years is as much as you can expect a drive that is used for Time 
 Machine to go. Mine is on the verge of crapping out, so I am considering just 
 paying for an online backup instead. Trouble is, full backup and restore is s 
  l  o  w   .   The next tier though has a local drive backup as well as the 
 online backup. 
 
 Bob
 
 
 On May 31, 2012, at 12:57 PM, Jeff Reynolds wrote:
 
 bob,
 
 alternate drive is for redundancy if a drive were ever to poop out and I 
 keep one off site or in a firesafe if here as well for the theft/fire issue. 
 
 I learned this thru a friend who had a very redundant backup system. only 
 problem was not good about offsite and there was a fire in the office took 
 out everything with fire, heat, smoke, and water damage... another friend 
 had his laptop and the backup drive attached (only one) stolen from his home 
 -- again SOL.
 
 also ive had a couple of drives go by a head coming loose and that pretty 
 much leaves you with nothing to recover...
 
 main drive system is a redundant raid as well. few hundred buck investment 
 over the years gives me a nice safety net and this system has spun along 
 fine now for 5 years w/o any hickups due to the drives. my experience with 
 backup systems has been total murphy's law.
 
 watching a few other folks trying to recover from a data disasters has 
 taught me as they all took huge number of hours (translate that to work 
 hours lost), bucks in data recovery efforts, and im sure a few weeks of 
 their life expectancy...
 
 over the years ive dealt with most kinds of tape and cartridge backup 
 systems as well with clients and companies ive worked with and most have 
 worked but talk about a pain to reconstruct, was rarely easy or fast, hence 
 when drives got cheap enough i moved fast!
 
 cheers
 
 jeff
 
 On May 31, 2012, at 3:33 PM, use-livecode-requ...@lists.runrev.com wrote:
 
 Should not need to alternate drives with Time Machine. 
 
 Bob
 
 ___
 use-livecode mailing list
 use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
 
 
 ___
 use-livecode mailing list
 use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


RE: Upgrade to Lion - backups

2012-05-31 Thread Ralph DiMola
I may be old school but in my data centers I do the following:

1) Raid arrays for local disks so no disk failure will either stop
production or incur data loss.
2) Either rotating off-site tape backups or raid disk swaps of current data
will take care of water/fire/wind.
3) Rotating tape backups with n number of dailies and unlimited monthlies
will take care of: OOPs I deleted the files
4) Mac Time machine or Windows restore previous versions for mid day
deletion or quick restore.

Do all the above and your golden.

Ralph DiMola
IT Director
Evergreen Information Services
rdim...@evergreeninfo.net


-Original Message-
From: use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com
[mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf Of Tim Jones
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 4:58 PM
To: How to use LiveCode
Subject: Re: Upgrade to Lion - backups

And ... what do you do if part of your failure instance includes a lack of
network connectivity?  No way back from that one.  Just saying...

Tim

On May 31, 2012, at 1:52 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:

 OIC that makes sense then. I priced out some of these online backup
systems like Carbonite, and by the time you pay as much as a 2 tb drive with
enclosure would cost, you could have paid for a 5 year subscription to
Carbonite. 5 years is as much as you can expect a drive that is used for
Time Machine to go. Mine is on the verge of crapping out, so I am
considering just paying for an online backup instead. Trouble is, full
backup and restore is s  l  o  w   .   The next tier though has a local
drive backup as well as the online backup. 
 
 Bob
 
 
 On May 31, 2012, at 12:57 PM, Jeff Reynolds wrote:
 
 bob,
 
 alternate drive is for redundancy if a drive were ever to poop out and I
keep one off site or in a firesafe if here as well for the theft/fire issue.

 
 I learned this thru a friend who had a very redundant backup system. only
problem was not good about offsite and there was a fire in the office took
out everything with fire, heat, smoke, and water damage... another friend
had his laptop and the backup drive attached (only one) stolen from his home
-- again SOL.
 
 also ive had a couple of drives go by a head coming loose and that pretty
much leaves you with nothing to recover...
 
 main drive system is a redundant raid as well. few hundred buck
investment over the years gives me a nice safety net and this system has
spun along fine now for 5 years w/o any hickups due to the drives. my
experience with backup systems has been total murphy's law.
 
 watching a few other folks trying to recover from a data disasters has
taught me as they all took huge number of hours (translate that to work
hours lost), bucks in data recovery efforts, and im sure a few weeks of
their life expectancy...
 
 over the years ive dealt with most kinds of tape and cartridge backup
systems as well with clients and companies ive worked with and most have
worked but talk about a pain to reconstruct, was rarely easy or fast, hence
when drives got cheap enough i moved fast!
 
 cheers
 
 jeff
 
 On May 31, 2012, at 3:33 PM, use-livecode-requ...@lists.runrev.com wrote:
 
 Should not need to alternate drives with Time Machine. 
 
 Bob
 
 ___
 use-livecode mailing list
 use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
 
 
 ___
 use-livecode mailing list
 use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode