Re: server push to desktop client

2019-11-05 Thread Phil Davis via use-livecode

Thanks for sharing your insight Richard. Great food for thought.

Phil


On 11/5/19 12:29 AM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote:

Phil Davis wrote:

> I need to make a desktop app (Mac only for now) that receives pushed
> data from a LC server. I've never done this - all the desktop <->
> server interactions I've programmed have used the traditional client-
> server model. So I'm looking for approaches/tips/ideas from anyone
> who has experience with other approaches.

I'd stick with simple polling for this.  Anything else requires either 
opening a socket (with all the firewall/router changes needed to allow 
that), or creating a dependency on a separate process like push 
notifications, which would likely require LCB.


Polling can get the job done well enough, and is secure and requires 
no router changes or external dependencies.  And if down the road you 
find a convenient way to switch to something else you can change that 
part, but at least it lets you get it out the door now using reliable 
features and your existing skillset.



> And maybe I'm making it too hard. Can FTP watch a server folder, and
> detect and respond to the creation of a file in the folder? Maybe I
> could use a method like that, if that's a capability of FTP.

You could poll from the client using FTP, but compared to HTTP it's a 
noisy protocol, with many more steps internally.  The inefficiency of 
FTP is more than offset by its utility when ad hoc access to remote 
file stores are needed.  But when the goal is more specific, HTTP will 
often beat it for both efficiency and client implementation cost every 
time.


On the server, an LC Server script that reports any changes to a 
folder from the last time it was called would be straightforward to 
write, give you reliably consistent results*, and would run quickly.



* Years ago when I was monitoring folders with FTP I learned more than 
I cared to about FTP date representations.  They vary.  A lot.  By 
different rules, according to a vastly flexible set of config options. 
So you can never know which server will use month-and-day only up to a 
certain cutoff, and then one of several month-day-year options for 
anything older.  Sometimes the cuttoff is a month.  Sometimes it's the 
year break.  Other times it's a specific number of days.  "Hey man, 
it's all about flexibility!" In all cases it can mean a listing in 
which date representations take on at least two different formats.


Even if you just had LC Server return "the detailed files" at least 
you'd have solid consistency in the format of every file, every time.




--
Phil Davis
503-307-4363


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: server push to desktop client

2019-11-05 Thread Phil Davis via use-livecode

Thank you Kee! This is extremely helpful.
Phil


On 11/5/19 12:38 AM, Kee Nethery via use-livecode wrote:

Normal data flow is Mac app contacts a central server and sees if there is 
updated data to acquire. If yes, it acquires it.

This is the normal flow because of firewalls and ports.

For the server to really push data to a Mac client, the Mac client has to be a 
server, with a routable IP address / port. Most client machines are behind 
firewalls that allow them to initiate contact, but do not allow random external 
machines to contact them.

So the normal setup is, server has a dns entry on an IP address that anyone can 
reach from anywhere on the Internet. Server is listening on a single port for 
incoming connections.

Assuming the same data (updates) goes to each client, server has a text page 
containing a single integer. That integer is the number of the latest update. 
Client hits that web page periodically to see if its internal integer is 
different from the server. It’s a very quick exchange.

Client sees their internal integer isn’t the same. Let’s say client has 92 and 
server has 103.

Client then hits pages 93 to 103 to get all the updates. For example:

http://my.server.com/updates/93.txt
All the way to:
http://my.server.com/updates/103.txt

On the server side, you create update pages and increment the integer at 
something like:

http://my.server.com/updates/last.txt

The server is fast because it serves up static pages and the fastest page is 
last.txt because it’s only (in this example) three characters “103”.

I’m assuming all clients get the same data.

When each client gets unique data, you’ll probably have a database on the 
server and clients will do hits against the server to see if they have new data 
to gather, and if yes, they’ll do their query with their userid to gather their 
data.

  The trade off between server text pages and server database responses is one 
of those things you’ll need to figure out which is most efficient for you. 
Could be you ship a client that can do both and the very first hit to the 
server is a static page that tells the client “text” or “database” and then the 
client does the right thing. Could periodically check that page and perhaps you 
have a flag on it like “database always” that tells the client to stop 
checking, all updates forever will be the database update process.

But ... client pulls from the server because most servers cannot push through 
firewalls and routers an NAT servers to initiate first contact with a client.

Kee Nethery


On Nov 4, 2019, at 11:26 PM, Phil Davis via use-livecode 
 wrote:

I need to make a desktop app (Mac only for now) that receives pushed data from a LC 
server. I've never done this - all the desktop <-> server interactions I've 
programmed have used the traditional client-server model. So I'm looking for 
approaches/tips/ideas from anyone who has experience with other approaches.

I'm not sure what protocol to use.

And maybe I'm making it too hard. Can FTP watch a server folder, and detect and 
respond to the creation of a file in the folder? Maybe I could use a method 
like that, if that's a capability of FTP.

Thanks for any input you may offer.

--
Phil Davis
503-307-4363


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


--
Phil Davis
503-307-4363


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: server push to desktop client

2019-11-05 Thread Kee Nethery via use-livecode
Normal data flow is Mac app contacts a central server and sees if there is 
updated data to acquire. If yes, it acquires it.

This is the normal flow because of firewalls and ports.

For the server to really push data to a Mac client, the Mac client has to be a 
server, with a routable IP address / port. Most client machines are behind 
firewalls that allow them to initiate contact, but do not allow random external 
machines to contact them.

So the normal setup is, server has a dns entry on an IP address that anyone can 
reach from anywhere on the Internet. Server is listening on a single port for 
incoming connections.

Assuming the same data (updates) goes to each client, server has a text page 
containing a single integer. That integer is the number of the latest update. 
Client hits that web page periodically to see if its internal integer is 
different from the server. It’s a very quick exchange.

Client sees their internal integer isn’t the same. Let’s say client has 92 and 
server has 103.

Client then hits pages 93 to 103 to get all the updates. For example:

http://my.server.com/updates/93.txt
All the way to:
http://my.server.com/updates/103.txt

On the server side, you create update pages and increment the integer at 
something like:

http://my.server.com/updates/last.txt

The server is fast because it serves up static pages and the fastest page is 
last.txt because it’s only (in this example) three characters “103”.

I’m assuming all clients get the same data.

When each client gets unique data, you’ll probably have a database on the 
server and clients will do hits against the server to see if they have new data 
to gather, and if yes, they’ll do their query with their userid to gather their 
data.

 The trade off between server text pages and server database responses is one 
of those things you’ll need to figure out which is most efficient for you. 
Could be you ship a client that can do both and the very first hit to the 
server is a static page that tells the client “text” or “database” and then the 
client does the right thing. Could periodically check that page and perhaps you 
have a flag on it like “database always” that tells the client to stop 
checking, all updates forever will be the database update process.

But ... client pulls from the server because most servers cannot push through 
firewalls and routers an NAT servers to initiate first contact with a client.

Kee Nethery

> On Nov 4, 2019, at 11:26 PM, Phil Davis via use-livecode 
>  wrote:
> 
> I need to make a desktop app (Mac only for now) that receives pushed data 
> from a LC server. I've never done this - all the desktop <-> server 
> interactions I've programmed have used the traditional client-server model. 
> So I'm looking for approaches/tips/ideas from anyone who has experience with 
> other approaches.
> 
> I'm not sure what protocol to use.
> 
> And maybe I'm making it too hard. Can FTP watch a server folder, and detect 
> and respond to the creation of a file in the folder? Maybe I could use a 
> method like that, if that's a capability of FTP.
> 
> Thanks for any input you may offer.
> 
> -- 
> Phil Davis
> 503-307-4363
> 
> 
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: server push to desktop client

2019-11-05 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode

Phil Davis wrote:

> I need to make a desktop app (Mac only for now) that receives pushed
> data from a LC server. I've never done this - all the desktop <->
> server interactions I've programmed have used the traditional client-
> server model. So I'm looking for approaches/tips/ideas from anyone
> who has experience with other approaches.

I'd stick with simple polling for this.  Anything else requires either 
opening a socket (with all the firewall/router changes needed to allow 
that), or creating a dependency on a separate process like push 
notifications, which would likely require LCB.


Polling can get the job done well enough, and is secure and requires no 
router changes or external dependencies.  And if down the road you find 
a convenient way to switch to something else you can change that part, 
but at least it lets you get it out the door now using reliable features 
and your existing skillset.



> And maybe I'm making it too hard. Can FTP watch a server folder, and
> detect and respond to the creation of a file in the folder? Maybe I
> could use a method like that, if that's a capability of FTP.

You could poll from the client using FTP, but compared to HTTP it's a 
noisy protocol, with many more steps internally.  The inefficiency of 
FTP is more than offset by its utility when ad hoc access to remote file 
stores are needed.  But when the goal is more specific, HTTP will often 
beat it for both efficiency and client implementation cost every time.


On the server, an LC Server script that reports any changes to a folder 
from the last time it was called would be straightforward to write, give 
you reliably consistent results*, and would run quickly.



* Years ago when I was monitoring folders with FTP I learned more than I 
cared to about FTP date representations.  They vary.  A lot.  By 
different rules, according to a vastly flexible set of config options. 
So you can never know which server will use month-and-day only up to a 
certain cutoff, and then one of several month-day-year options for 
anything older.  Sometimes the cuttoff is a month.  Sometimes it's the 
year break.  Other times it's a specific number of days.  "Hey man, it's 
all about flexibility!" In all cases it can mean a listing in which date 
representations take on at least two different formats.


Even if you just had LC Server return "the detailed files" at least 
you'd have solid consistency in the format of every file, every time.


--
 Richard Gaskin
 Fourth World Systems
 Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
 
 ambassa...@fourthworld.comhttp://www.FourthWorld.com

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


server push to desktop client

2019-11-04 Thread Phil Davis via use-livecode
I need to make a desktop app (Mac only for now) that receives pushed 
data from a LC server. I've never done this - all the desktop <-> server 
interactions I've programmed have used the traditional client-server 
model. So I'm looking for approaches/tips/ideas from anyone who has 
experience with other approaches.


I'm not sure what protocol to use.

And maybe I'm making it too hard. Can FTP watch a server folder, and 
detect and respond to the creation of a file in the folder? Maybe I 
could use a method like that, if that's a capability of FTP.


Thanks for any input you may offer.

--
Phil Davis
503-307-4363


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode