Re: Simple Scoping Question

2005-06-16 Thread Erik Hansen
--- Scott Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  and if any of your mainstack cards
  may be deleted?
 
 consider relegating your deletable cards to a
 substack.

that did it, thanks.

Erik Hansen


[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.erikhansen.org

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Simple Scoping Question

2005-04-25 Thread Alejandro Tejada
on Thu, 21 Apr 2005 
Mikey wrote:

 d) The lack of manuals means that most of the 
 issues are from noobs,who don't know about the 
 archives, or aren't used to using them before
 asking questions first.

Hi Mikey,

Could you explain what you mean when you
said: The lack of manuals?

You could download a manual from:

http://www.sonsothunder.com/devres/revolution/downloads/revdocs-PDF.zip
http://www.sonsothunder.com/devres/revolution/downloads/revdocs-RTF.zip
http://www.sonsothunder.com/devres/revolution/downloads/revdocs-TXT.zip

98 % of the Printed manual is in these docs...
For free.

But notice, mikey, you could buy the manual here:
http://secure.runrev.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PRODProduct_Code=MANLPRNTCategory_Code=Store_Code=WYRUQVXT


al





Visit my site:
http://www.geocities.com/capellan2000/

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Simple Scoping Question

2005-04-25 Thread Mikey
Al,
I'm not going to argue with you at length on this one.  The reason
there is a Revolution Documentation Project is because...

-- 
http://taoofrunrev.blogspot.com
http://taoof4d.blogspot.com
http://4dwishlist.blogspot.com
On the first day, God created the heavens and the Earth
On the second day, God created the oceans.
On the third day, God put the animals on hold for a few hours,
   and did a little diving.
And God said, This is good.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Simple Scoping Question

2005-04-21 Thread Frank D. Engel, Jr.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Now if only more people would read the archives *before* posting the 
questions, the list would have more answers to fewer questions 
(allowing time for things to catch up...)

On Apr 20, 2005, at 9:28 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
We try to answer questions here before they've been asked. It saves 
time and spooks the competition. ;)
- ---
Frank D. Engel, Jr.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
$ ln -s /usr/share/kjvbible /usr/manual
$ true | cat /usr/manual | grep John 3:16
John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten 
Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have 
everlasting life.
$
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFCZ6lC7aqtWrR9cZoRAvA7AJ9H8U4X1LRJiHhUWtdpWITZSCdOPQCdGorv
XPvRC1RMLqGfUjFcJqLO+zU=
=+Sof
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
$0 Web Hosting with up to 200MB web space, 1000 MB Transfer
10 Personalized POP and Web E-mail Accounts, and much more.
Signup at www.doteasy.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Simple Scoping Question

2005-04-21 Thread Mikey
The problem with the archives is that
a) responses here are very fast (in other words, y'all make it easy),
and the culture is permissive
b) Honestly, the archive search tools are not as easy to use
c) Most of the responses are not so complicated as to discourage the
responders from telling the noobs to RTFA and
d) The lack of manuals means that most of the issues are from noobs,
who don't know about the archives, or aren't used to using them before
asking questions first.

In the 4D community we have a tool called Monkeywerks, which is very
easy to use, and returns results quickly and completely, with
excerpts.  In addition, most of the repeat issues are complex, and
thus the monkey gets referrals.

-- 
http://taoofrunrev.blogspot.com
http://taoof4d.blogspot.com
http://4dwishlist.blogspot.com
On the first day, God created the heavens and the Earth
On the second day, God created the oceans.
On the third day, God put the animals on hold for a few hours,
   and did a little diving.
And God said, This is good.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Simple Scoping Question

2005-04-21 Thread David Burgun
The problem with the archives is that
a) responses here are very fast (in other words, y'all make it easy),
and the culture is permissive
b) Honestly, the archive search tools are not as easy to use
c) Most of the responses are not so complicated as to discourage the
responders from telling the noobs to RTFA and
d) The lack of manuals means that most of the issues are from noobs,
who don't know about the archives, or aren't used to using them before
asking questions first.
I agree and and not only this, but also for a newbie it isn't always 
obvious what terms to seach for. For instance I had a problem that 
was to do with not knowing how to handle preOpenStack, openStack and 
closeStack. However, the code worked fine until I added a menubar. 
Both are areas that:

1)  Crash or make the IDE unuable.
2)  Are not documented in any detail (that I can find).
3)  Take a lot of time to debug.
Given all this, I spent ages trying to figure out what was wrong with 
the menubar handling, it was only once I starting asking questions 
did I follow the trail and let to the real problem.

Thanks again, I think it would be almost impossible to learn RunRev 
in any realistic time-frame without this list.

All the Best
Dave
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Simple Scoping Question

2005-04-21 Thread Erik Hansen

--- Scott Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 ... to initialize stuff, placing the init
 scripts in the first card of
 your main stack causes the scripts to
 run only when the main stack is
 opened (preOpenStack, openStack, openCard,
 etc).

and if any of your mainstack cards
may be deleted?

Erik Hansen

[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.erikhansen.org

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Simple Scoping Question

2005-04-21 Thread Scott Rossi
Recently, Erik Hansen  wrote:

 ... to initialize stuff, placing the init
 scripts in the first card of
 your main stack causes the scripts to
 run only when the main stack is
 opened (preOpenStack, openStack, openCard,
 etc).
 
 and if any of your mainstack cards
 may be deleted?

First I would question if this is really need to build your stack this way.
But in any event, you could prohibit deletion of the first card.  Or
consider relegating your deletable cards to a substack.  Or place your init
scripts in the mainstack and manage by window name accordingly.  Or you can
go through all substacks and place blocking handlers in each (open
preOpenStack, end preOpenstack, etc).

Lots of options...

Regards,

Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, Multimedia  Design
-
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: http://www.tactilemedia.com

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Simple Scoping Question

2005-04-21 Thread Scott Rossi
Recently, Scott Rossi  wrote:

 Or you can go through all substacks and place blocking handlers in each (open
 preOpenStack, end preOpenstack, etc).

Actually the following is a little more clear:

 on preOpenStack
 end preOpenStack

 on openStack
 end openStack

Etc.

These are placed in your substacks if you store your init scripts in your
mainstack.

Regards,

Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, Multimedia  Design
-
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: http://www.tactilemedia.com

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Simple Scoping Question

2005-04-21 Thread Erik Hansen

--- Scott Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Recently, Erik Hansen  wrote:
 
  ... to initialize stuff, placing the init
  scripts in the first card of
  your main stack causes the scripts to
  run only when the main stack is
  opened (preOpenStack, openStack, openCard,
  etc).
 
  and if any of your mainstack cards
  may be deleted?
 
 First I would question if this is really need
 to build your stack this way.
 But in any event, you could prohibit deletion
 of the first card.  Or
 consider relegating your deletable cards to a
 substack.  Or place your init
 scripts in the mainstack and manage by window
 name accordingly.  Or you can
 go through all substacks and place blocking
 handlers in each (open
 preOpenStack, end preOpenstack, etc).
 
 Lots of options...

thanks,
maybe that splash stack could 
do the init job, then beat it.

Erik Hansen

[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.erikhansen.org



__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ 
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Simple Scoping Question

2005-04-20 Thread David Burgun
Hi,
If I have a Stack (Call iits GlobalStack that has a lot of common 
funtions in the Stack Script, and those functions refer to this 
Stack, which stack does that actually refer to?

e.g. if Stack A
does a start using start using stack GlobalStack
and thean Stack A calls a Function in GlobalStack that refers to 
this stack does that refer to Stack A or GlobalStack ?

Does this work the same way if the Stacks in question are both main 
stacks and does it work the same way in a Standalone Application?

Thanks in advance
Dave
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Simple Scoping Question

2005-04-20 Thread Rob Cozens
Hi Dave,
e.g. if Stack A
does a start using start using stack GlobalStack
and thean Stack A calls a Function in GlobalStack that refers to this 
stack does that refer to Stack A or GlobalStack ?

Does this work the same way if the Stacks in question are both main stacks 
and does it work the same way in a Standalone Application?
This always refers to the currently selected, whether referencing 
stacks, cards, groups, or individual controls.  Substitute
'stack GlobalStack' for this stack in GlobalStack's stack script.

Rob Cozens, Staff Conservator
Mendonoma Marine Life Conservancy
It is contrary to human welfare to contribute in any way...
 to the degradation of the sea's capacity to support life.
 -- Walter Hickel, U. S. Secretary of the Interior, 1971
in From Abundance to Scarcity by Michael L. Weber 

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Simple Scoping Question

2005-04-20 Thread David Burgun
Hi Dave,
e.g. if Stack A
does a start using start using stack GlobalStack
and thean Stack A calls a Function in GlobalStack that refers to 
this stack does that refer to Stack A or GlobalStack ?

Does this work the same way if the Stacks in question are both main 
stacks and does it work the same way in a Standalone Application?
This always refers to the currently selected, whether 
referencing stacks, cards, groups, or individual controls. 
Substitute
'stack GlobalStack' for this stack in GlobalStack's stack script.

Rob Cozens, Staff Conservator
Mendonoma Marine Life Conservancy
Hi,
I am confused, in the case where StackA calls a Function in 
GlobalStack, when in that function should this stack return 
StackA or GlobalStack ?

I want it to return StackA so that the functions are general.
Thanks a lot
Dave
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Simple Scoping Question

2005-04-20 Thread Eric Chatonet
Hi Dave,
In any script of stack A, if you call a function placed in the script 
of stack B, *this* will refer to stack A since your script has been 
initiated in stack A.
Function or handler places do not matter.
The only important point is: from where do I began :-)

Le 20 avr. 05, à 17:33, David Burgun a écrit :
Hi Dave,
e.g. if Stack A
does a start using start using stack GlobalStack
and thean Stack A calls a Function in GlobalStack that refers to 
this stack does that refer to Stack A or GlobalStack ?

Does this work the same way if the Stacks in question are both main 
stacks and does it work the same way in a Standalone Application?
This always refers to the currently selected, whether referencing 
stacks, cards, groups, or individual controls. Substitute
'stack GlobalStack' for this stack in GlobalStack's stack script.

Rob Cozens, Staff Conservator
Mendonoma Marine Life Conservancy
Hi,
I am confused, in the case where StackA calls a Function in 
GlobalStack, when in that function should this stack return 
StackA or GlobalStack ?

I want it to return StackA so that the functions are general.
Amicalement,
Eric Chatonet.

So Smart Software
For institutions, companies and associations
Built-to-order applications: management, multimedia, internet, etc.
Windows, Mac OS and Linux... With the French touch

Web sitehttp://www.sosmartsoftware.com/
Email   [EMAIL PROTECTED]/
Phone   33 (0)1 43 31 77 62
Mobile  33 (0)6 20 74 50 86

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Simple Scoping Question

2005-04-20 Thread David Burgun
Hi,
That's how I thought it would work. I am getting very strange results
from code that does this tho. Could the Current Stack be being lost
as a result of calling Answer or put xxx into msg box?
Thanks
Dave

Hi Dave,
In any script of stack A, if you call a function placed in the
script of stack B, *this* will refer to stack A since your script
has been initiated in stack A.
Function or handler places do not matter.
The only important point is: from where do I began :-)
Le 20 avr. 05, à 17:33, David Burgun a écrit :
Hi Dave,
e.g. if Stack A
does a start using start using stack GlobalStack
and thean Stack A calls a Function in GlobalStack that refers
to this stack does that refer to Stack A or GlobalStack ?
Does this work the same way if the Stacks in question are both
main stacks and does it work the same way in a Standalone
Application?
This always refers to the currently selected, whether
referencing stacks, cards, groups, or individual controls.
Substitute
'stack GlobalStack' for this stack in GlobalStack's stack script.
Rob Cozens, Staff Conservator
Mendonoma Marine Life Conservancy
Hi,
I am confused, in the case where StackA calls a Function in
GlobalStack, when in that function should this stack return
StackA or GlobalStack ?
I want it to return StackA so that the functions are general.
Amicalement,
Eric Chatonet.

So Smart Software
For institutions, companies and associations
Built-to-order applications: management, multimedia, internet, etc.
Windows, Mac OS and Linux... With the French touch

Web sitehttp://www.sosmartsoftware.com/
Email   [EMAIL PROTECTED]/
Phone   33 (0)1 43 31 77 62
Mobile  33 (0)6 20 74 50 86

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Simple Scoping Question

2005-04-20 Thread Eric Chatonet
Hi Dave,
No.
But a statement setting the defaultStack property yes.
Best,
Le 20 avr. 05, à 18:41, David Burgun a écrit :
Hi,
That's how I thought it would work. I am getting very strange results
from code that does this tho. Could the Current Stack be being lost
as a result of calling Answer or put xxx into msg box?
Thanks
Dave

Hi Dave,
In any script of stack A, if you call a function placed in the
script of stack B, *this* will refer to stack A since your script
has been initiated in stack A.
Function or handler places do not matter.
The only important point is: from where do I began :-)
Le 20 avr. 05, à 17:33, David Burgun a écrit :
Hi Dave,
e.g. if Stack A
does a start using start using stack GlobalStack
and thean Stack A calls a Function in GlobalStack that refers
to this stack does that refer to Stack A or GlobalStack ?
Does this work the same way if the Stacks in question are both
main stacks and does it work the same way in a Standalone
Application?
This always refers to the currently selected, whether
referencing stacks, cards, groups, or individual controls.
Substitute
'stack GlobalStack' for this stack in GlobalStack's stack 
script.

Rob Cozens, Staff Conservator
Mendonoma Marine Life Conservancy
Hi,
I am confused, in the case where StackA calls a Function in
GlobalStack, when in that function should this stack return
StackA or GlobalStack ?
I want it to return StackA so that the functions are general.
Amicalement,
Eric Chatonet.

So Smart Software
For institutions, companies and associations
Built-to-order applications: management, multimedia, internet, etc.
Windows, Mac OS and Linux... With the French touch

Web sitehttp://www.sosmartsoftware.com/
Email   [EMAIL PROTECTED]/
Phone   33 (0)1 43 31 77 62
Mobile  33 (0)6 20 74 50 86

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Simple Scoping Question

2005-04-20 Thread David Burgun
Hi,
Ok, I think I have found the problem! I have a openStack handler in
the script of the Stack,  as so:
on openStack
local myStackFileName,myStackShortName,myGlobalStackName
put the fileName of this stack into myStackFileName
put the short name of this stack into myStackShortName
put replaceText(myStackFileName, myStackShortName,GlobalStack into
myGlobalStackName
set the cpGlobalStackFileName to myGlobalStackName   --*Breakpoint here
--start using stack myGlobalStackName  -Commented out to stop crashing
end openStack
on closeStack
if the cpGlobalStackFileName of this stack   empty
  -- stop using stack the cpGlobalStackFileName of this stack
-Commented out to stop crashing
  set the cpGlobalStackFileName to empty
end if
end closeStack
---
The Stack is closed and then I re-open it and hit the breakpoint and
the variables are set as you would expect and I think the start using
line would work ok.
I then hit run and then Save the Stack and hit the breakpoint again,
this time the variables are set as follows:
myStackFileName - empty
myStackShortName  - empty
myGlobalStackName  - revSaving
I hadn't realized that the openStack handler gets called when doing a
Save. What is the recommended action for handle this?
I could do one of three things:
1.  Check if myStackFileName is empty and if so skip the start uisng
2.  Check the Stack Name for revSaving and if so skip the start uisng
3.  Check if in development moce and if so  skip the start uisng
I suppose I need similar tests in preOpenStack and closeStack?
Can anyone tell me the best thing to do under this condition?
Thanks in advance.
Dave

Hi Dave,
No.
But a statement setting the defaultStack property yes.
Best,
Le 20 avr. 05, à 18:41, David Burgun a écrit :
Hi,
That's how I thought it would work. I am getting very strange results
from code that does this tho. Could the Current Stack be being lost
as a result of calling Answer or put xxx into msg box?
Thanks
Dave
Hi Dave,
In any script of stack A, if you call a function placed in the
script of stack B, *this* will refer to stack A since your script
has been initiated in stack A.
Function or handler places do not matter.
The only important point is: from where do I began :-)
Le 20 avr. 05, à 17:33, David Burgun a écrit :
Hi Dave,
e.g. if Stack A
does a start using start using stack GlobalStack
and thean Stack A calls a Function in GlobalStack that refers
to this stack does that refer to Stack A or GlobalStack ?
Does this work the same way if the Stacks in question are both
main stacks and does it work the same way in a Standalone
Application?
This always refers to the currently selected, whether
referencing stacks, cards, groups, or individual controls.
Substitute
'stack GlobalStack' for this stack in GlobalStack's stack script.
Rob Cozens, Staff Conservator
Mendonoma Marine Life Conservancy
Hi,
I am confused, in the case where StackA calls a Function in
GlobalStack, when in that function should this stack return
StackA or GlobalStack ?
I want it to return StackA so that the functions are general.
Amicalement,
Eric Chatonet.

So Smart Software
For institutions, companies and associations
Built-to-order applications: management, multimedia, internet, etc.
Windows, Mac OS and Linux... With the French touch

Web sitehttp://www.sosmartsoftware.com/
Email   [EMAIL PROTECTED]/
Phone   33 (0)1 43 31 77 62
Mobile  33 (0)6 20 74 50 86

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Simple Scoping Question

2005-04-20 Thread Eric Chatonet
Hi,
openStack handler is called each time a stack is open: in the IDE it 
may be when opening any script, any property window, rev error dialog, 
app browser, etc..
In fact any window. That's the great thing with Rev : the IDE is built 
with Rev :-)
As for your problem, you have to check when you have to trigger or PASS 
a system message with a condition test.
You are right: IDE behaviour if different from stand alone environment.
You can check this too and act accordingly.
Best,

Le 20 avr. 05, à 19:53, David Burgun a écrit :
I hadn't realized that the openStack handler gets called when doing a
Save. What is the recommended action for handle this?
I could do one of three things:
1.  Check if myStackFileName is empty and if so skip the start uisng
2.  Check the Stack Name for revSaving and if so skip the start 
uisng
3.  Check if in development moce and if so  skip the start uisng

I suppose I need similar tests in preOpenStack and closeStack?

Amicalement,
Eric Chatonet.

So Smart Software
For institutions, companies and associations
Built-to-order applications: management, multimedia, internet, etc.
Windows, Mac OS and Linux... With the French touch

Web sitehttp://www.sosmartsoftware.com/
Email   [EMAIL PROTECTED]/
Phone   33 (0)1 43 31 77 62
Mobile  33 (0)6 20 74 50 86

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Simple Scoping Question

2005-04-20 Thread David Burgun
Hi Eric and thanks for the help!

As for your problem, you have to check when you have to trigger or
PASS a system message with a condition test.
You are right: IDE behaviour if different from stand alone environment.
You can check this too and act accordingly.
I really don't understand what you mean here, what test do I need to
perform? One of these, or something different?
1.  Check if myStackFileName is empty and if so skip the start uisng
2.  Check the Stack Name for revSaving and if so skip the start uisng
3.  Check if in development moce and if so  skip the start uisng
Assuming it's 1 above, do you mean do this:
if myStackFileName = empty then
   pass openStack
   exit openStack
end if
Do I use the same test in the closeStack handler?
Thanks in Advance
Dave
Hi,
openStack handler is called each time a stack is open: in the IDE it
may be when opening any script, any property window, rev error
dialog, app browser, etc..
In fact any window. That's the great thing with Rev : the IDE is
built with Rev :-)
As for your problem, you have to check when you have to trigger or
PASS a system message with a condition test.
You are right: IDE behaviour if different from stand alone environment.
You can check this too and act accordingly.
Best,
Le 20 avr. 05, à 19:53, David Burgun a écrit :
I hadn't realized that the openStack handler gets called when doing a
Save. What is the recommended action for handle this?
I could do one of three things:
1.  Check if myStackFileName is empty and if so skip the start uisng
2.  Check the Stack Name for revSaving and if so skip the start uisng
3.  Check if in development moce and if so  skip the start uisng
I suppose I need similar tests in preOpenStack and closeStack?

Amicalement,
Eric Chatonet.

So Smart Software
For institutions, companies and associations
Built-to-order applications: management, multimedia, internet, etc.
Windows, Mac OS and Linux... With the French touch

Web sitehttp://www.sosmartsoftware.com/
Email   [EMAIL PROTECTED]/
Phone   33 (0)1 43 31 77 62
Mobile  33 (0)6 20 74 50 86

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Simple Scoping Question

2005-04-20 Thread Scott Rossi
Recently, David Burgun  wrote:

 I hadn't realized that the openStack handler gets called when doing a
 Save. What is the recommended action for handle this?
 
 I could do one of three things:
 
 1.  Check if myStackFileName is empty and if so skip the start uisng
 2.  Check the Stack Name for revSaving and if so skip the start uisng
 3.  Check if in development moce and if so  skip the start uisng
 
 I suppose I need similar tests in preOpenStack and closeStack?
 
 Can anyone tell me the best thing to do under this condition?

If your openStack handler is only supposed to apply to your main stack, then
place the openStack handler in the script of the *first card* of your main
stack (this goes for any initialization handlers since they are only called
when the first card is opened).  Any subsequent opening/closing of stacks
will not trigger the init handler/s.

If your openStack handler must apply to any substacks of your main stack,
you can do as you suggest above: check the stack's name, for development
mode, etc.

Regards,

Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, Multimedia  Design
-
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: http://www.tactilemedia.com

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Simple Scoping Question

2005-04-20 Thread Graham Samuel
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:33:47 +0100, David Burgun  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am confused, in the case where StackA calls a Function in
GlobalStack, when in that function should this stack return
StackA or GlobalStack ?
I want it to return StackA so that the functions are general.
I think it works the way you want: if  you put a function in your  
mainstack GlobalStack whose script is

function ReportMyName
  return the short name of this stack
end ReportMyName
and then you call it from your substack StackA (the script of  
GlobalStack will automatically be in the message path) say in a  
button which is scripted

on mouseUp
  put reportMyName()
end mouseUp
You'll get StackA in the message box, but if you run that script from  
GlobalStack, you'll get GlobableStack, or from another substack  
StackB, then that name. So within the function, 'this' still refers  
to the calling stack. I think this is what you expected.

HTH
Graham
 
---
Graham Samuel / The Living Fossil Co. / UK and France

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Simple Scoping Question

2005-04-20 Thread David Burgun
Hi,
Thanks a lot for this. No, I don't have any substacks so moving it 
into the card script sounds best. Ok a couple of questions of this. 
You say move it to the first card, well in this stack there is only 
one card so the issue doesn't come out, but for the sake of knowing, 
if I have more than one card in the stack, do you mean the card that 
is currently the first card, or the first card created by the IDE?

Sorry if I sound dense, but I have been mucking about with this for 
ages and I just wanna get it right!

Thanks for the help
Dave
Recently, David Burgun  wrote:
 I hadn't realized that the openStack handler gets called when doing a
 Save. What is the recommended action for handle this?
 I could do one of three things:
 1.  Check if myStackFileName is empty and if so skip the start uisng
 2.  Check the Stack Name for revSaving and if so skip the start uisng
 3.  Check if in development moce and if so  skip the start uisng
 I suppose I need similar tests in preOpenStack and closeStack?
 Can anyone tell me the best thing to do under this condition?
If your openStack handler is only supposed to apply to your main stack, then
place the openStack handler in the script of the *first card* of your main
stack (this goes for any initialization handlers since they are only called
when the first card is opened).  Any subsequent opening/closing of stacks
will not trigger the init handler/s.
If your openStack handler must apply to any substacks of your main stack,
you can do as you suggest above: check the stack's name, for development
mode, etc.
Regards,
Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, Multimedia  Design
-
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: http://www.tactilemedia.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Simple Scoping Question

2005-04-20 Thread Scott Rossi
Recently, David Burgun  wrote:

 If your openStack handler is only supposed to apply to your main stack, then
 place the openStack handler in the script of the *first card* of your main
 stack (this goes for any initialization handlers since they are only called
 when the first card is opened).  Any subsequent opening/closing of stacks
 will not trigger the init handler/s.

 Thanks a lot for this. No, I don't have any substacks so moving it
 into the card script sounds best. Ok a couple of questions of this.
 You say move it to the first card, well in this stack there is only
 one card so the issue doesn't come out, but for the sake of knowing,
 if I have more than one card in the stack, do you mean the card that
 is currently the first card, or the first card created by the IDE?

Literally, the first card of *your* main stack.

In your case there is only one card but the method still applies: whenever
you need to initialize stuff, placing the init scripts in the first card of
your main stack limits causes the scripts to run only when the main stack is
opened (preOpenStack, openStack, openCard, etc).  Subsequent opening/closing
of substacks or IDE stacks will not trigger your card scripts because they
are not part of the other stacks' message hierarchy.

Regards,

Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, Multimedia  Design
-
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: http://www.tactilemedia.com

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Simple Scoping Question

2005-04-20 Thread David Burgun
Recently, David Burgun  wrote:
 If your openStack handler is only supposed to apply to your main 
stack, then
 place the openStack handler in the script of the *first card* of your main
 stack (this goes for any initialization handlers since they are only called
 when the first card is opened).  Any subsequent opening/closing of stacks
 will not trigger the init handler/s.

 Thanks a lot for this. No, I don't have any substacks so moving it
 into the card script sounds best. Ok a couple of questions of this.
 You say move it to the first card, well in this stack there is only
 one card so the issue doesn't come out, but for the sake of knowing,
 if I have more than one card in the stack, do you mean the card that
 is currently the first card, or the first card created by the IDE?
Literally, the first card of *your* main stack.
In your case there is only one card but the method still applies: whenever
you need to initialize stuff, placing the init scripts in the first card of
your main stack limits causes the scripts to run only when the main stack is
opened (preOpenStack, openStack, openCard, etc).  Subsequent opening/closing
of substacks or IDE stacks will not trigger your card scripts because they
are not part of the other stacks' message hierarchy.
Ok, I think I understand that, in this case though, the Stack in 
question *is* a main stack, does this make a difference?

The reason I asked is because I have some Stacks that have multiple 
cards formed into a Tabbed Button, one card for each tab, and on the 
stacks that have this control I send a menuPick command to the Tab to 
select the correct card. I was wondering if this would cause 
problems, seems not? Just add it to the fist card of the Stack.

Ok, I will give this a try and report back.
Thanks a lot for your help, you don't know how much I appreciate it. 
Some of this stuff is a complete mystery. The documentation seems so 
scattered that it's hard to know what is going on sometimes.

I guess it doesn't help that the IDE gets hosed so often when trying 
to setup this kind of stuff.

All the Best
Dave
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Simple Scoping Question

2005-04-20 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 4/20/05 2:33 PM, David Burgun wrote:
Ok, I think I understand that, in this case though, the Stack in 
question *is* a main stack, does this make a difference?
Every stack has one or more cards; mainstacks, substacks, all of them. 
Type this into the message box:

 go card 1
Whatever card appears, that is card one of the current stack. Card 1 is 
also the card you first see when the stack opens, as the engine 
automatically displays that card by default. If you have not set a label 
for your stack and it has more than one card, you will see the card 
number in the title bar as well.

Cards are numbered in the order you have created them. A new stack 
automatically has one card. If you create another card, that will be 
card 2. If you use the arrow keys to page through your stack, it will 
show the cards in order. You can change the order of the cards if 
necessary (though it isn't often done; usually only needed if you decide 
you want to add a title card at the front later on.) To change card order:

  set the number of this card to number
i.e.: set the number of this card to 1
Ask if you need more info.
The reason I asked is because I have some Stacks that have multiple 
cards formed into a Tabbed Button, one card for each tab, and on the 
stacks that have this control I send a menuPick command to the Tab to 
select the correct card. I was wondering if this would cause problems, 
seems not? Just add it to the fist card of the Stack.

Ok, I will give this a try and report back.
Thanks a lot for your help, you don't know how much I appreciate it. 
Some of this stuff is a complete mystery. The documentation seems so 
scattered that it's hard to know what is going on sometimes.

I guess it doesn't help that the IDE gets hosed so often when trying to 
setup this kind of stuff.

All the Best
Dave
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Simple Scoping Question

2005-04-20 Thread Mikey
 Cards are numbered in the order you have created them. A new stack
 automatically has one card. If you create another card, that will be
 card 2. If you use the arrow keys to page through your stack, it will
 show the cards in order. You can change the order of the cards if
 necessary (though it isn't often done; usually only needed if you decide
 you want to add a title card at the front later on.) To change card order:
 
set the number of this card to number
 i.e.: set the number of this card to 1

E. Freaking S. P.  I have not been following this thread.  I was going
to post this question, but for some reason decided to check this
thread for some other reason first.  Freaking amazing.
-- 
http://taoOfRunRev.blogspot.com
http://taoof4d.blogspot.com
http://4dwishlist.blogspot.com
On the first day, God created the heavens and the Earth
On the second day, God created the oceans.
On the third day, God put the animals on hold for a few hours,
   and did a little diving.
And God said, This is good.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Simple Scoping Question

2005-04-20 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 4/20/05 3:46 PM, Mikey wrote:
Cards are numbered in the order you have created them. A new stack
automatically has one card. If you create another card, that will be
card 2. If you use the arrow keys to page through your stack, it will
show the cards in order. You can change the order of the cards if
necessary (though it isn't often done; usually only needed if you decide
you want to add a title card at the front later on.) To change card 
order:

   set the number of this card to number
i.e.: set the number of this card to 1


 E. Freaking S. P.  I have not been following this thread.  I was going
 to post this question, but for some reason decided to check this
 thread for some other reason first.  Freaking amazing.

We try to answer questions here before they've been asked. It saves time 
and spooks the competition. ;)

--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution